Dam capacity per capita 2011
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Suriname | 35,953.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Canada | 24,352.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Zimbabwe | 7,347.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Iceland | 7,226.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Zambia | 7,004.77 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Norway | 6,719.18 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Paraguay | 5,766.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Ghana | 5,690.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Russia | 5,564.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Nicaragua | 5,500.12 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Venezuela | 5,400.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Uruguay | 5,156.17 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Iraq | 4,719.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Kazakhstan | 4,684.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,213.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | New Zealand | 3,853.26 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Sweden | 3,805.48 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Tajikistan | 3,770.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Brazil | 3,586.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Australia | 3,460.28 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Finland | 3,452.52 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Argentina | 3,153.56 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Mozambique | 3,134.87 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Panama | 2,473.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Uganda | 2,398.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | United States | 2,342.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Azerbaijan | 2,327.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Tanzania | 2,263.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Turkey | 2,126.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Egypt | 1,846.43 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Laos | 1,652.51 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Montenegro | 1,624.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Côte d'Ivoire | 1,620.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Lesotho | 1,400.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Albania | 1,384.16 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Mexico | 1,301.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Thailand | 1,148.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Spain | 1,145.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | North Macedonia | 1,122.25 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Greece | 1,109.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Portugal | 1,101.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Guyana | 1,084.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Ukraine | 1,019.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Turkmenistan | 984.355 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Bulgaria | 883.249 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Georgia | 882.436 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Syrian Arab Republic | 858.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | North Korea | 845.744 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Mali | 837.632 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 778.342 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Cameroon | 771.569 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Malaysia | 769.843 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Uzbekistan | 763.687 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Chile | 761.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Honduras | 679.656 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | El Salvador | 636.933 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Kenya | 579.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | South Africa | 576.175 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Netherlands | 547.977 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Romania | 545.429 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Morocco | 541.899 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Eswatini | 523.325 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Ecuador | 501.885 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Vietnam | 501.503 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Cuba | 501.004 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Latvia | 487.878 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Armenia | 474.438 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Botswana | 472.481 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | China | 468.378 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Iran | 460.454 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Costa Rica | 433.204 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Switzerland | 422.459 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Angola | 390.002 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | South Korea | 383.38 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Belize | 371.832 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Namibia | 330.114 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Belarus | 327.255 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Burkina Faso | 320.346 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Slovakia | 319.871 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Republic of Moldova | 316.957 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Myanmar | 314.246 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Serbia | 308.207 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Czech Republic | 303.396 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Nigeria | 295.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Sri Lanka | 282.831 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Cyprus | 260.539 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Austria | 253.501 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Colombia | 249.28 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Togo | 248.316 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Japan | 245.548 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Tunisia | 232.075 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Dominican Republic | 227.809 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Algeria | 225.027 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Croatia | 224.723 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Sao Tome and Principe | 210.074 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Peru | 196.998 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Ireland | 189.754 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | India | 188.676 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Ethiopia | 186.805 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Guinea | 172.378 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Italy | 166.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Lithuania | 163.506 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | France | 156.609 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Fiji | 145.675 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Mauritania | 142.743 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Estonia | 137.491 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Pakistan | 136.485 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Gabon | 123.458 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Luxembourg | 119.556 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Brunei Darussalam | 112.705 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Indonesia | 92.279 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Mongolia | 91.069 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | United Kingdom | 83.004 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Poland | 77.362 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Philippines | 72.317 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Mauritius | 72.201 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Afghanistan | 68.455 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Libya | 61.466 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Antigua and Barbuda | 58.159 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Bolivia | 57.069 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Liberia | 56.525 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Samoa | 51.358 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Trinidad and Tobago | 51.234 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Germany | 49.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Lebanon | 44.741 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Bangladesh | 42.17 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Saudi Arabia | 38.461 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Jordan | 36.752 cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Sierra Leone | 34.444 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Guatemala | 31.337 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Haiti | 29.955 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Oman | 28.725 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Hungary | 25.778 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Madagascar | 21.622 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Senegal | 19.292 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Yemen | 16.768 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Slovenia | 16.351 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Saint Lucia | 15.134 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Eritrea | 14.711 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Singapore | 14.453 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Belgium | 13.072 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Seychelles | 10.307 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | United Arab Emirates | 8.483 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Niger | 5.452 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Denmark | 3.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Nepal | 3.106 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Malawi | 2.735 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Benin | 2.328 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Jamaica | 1.974 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Congo | 1.952 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 0.746 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Grenada | 0.196 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Cambodia | 0.068 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Bahrain | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Malta | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Malta
- #158
Maldives
- #157
Guinea-Bissau
- #156
Cabo Verde
- #155
Bhutan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2011, the metric of dam capacity per capita provided a crucial lens through which the state of global water resource management could be assessed. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, serves as an indicator of how effectively countries manage their water resources to ensure water security, support agriculture, and sustain industries and communities. Given the rising challenges posed by climate change and population growth, understanding dam capacity per capita is essential for sustaining development and enhancing environmental resilience.
Global Overview of Dam Capacity in 2011
In 2011, dam capacity per capita varied significantly across the globe. With data available from 163 countries, the average dam capacity per capita was calculated at 1,379.81 cubic meters, with a median value of 308.21 cubic meters. This disparity highlights the uneven distribution of water storage infrastructure across different regions. Suriname led the world with an astonishing 35,953.8 cubic meters per capita, followed by Canada with 24,352.3 cubic meters. These figures underscore the abundance of freshwater resources and extensive dam infrastructure in these nations, potentially attributed to favorable geographic and climatic conditions.
Regional Disparities and Influencing Factors
Regional disparities in dam capacity per capita were stark. Many African and island nations, including Rwanda, Bahrain, and the Maldives, had negligible or zero capacity, pointing to challenges in infrastructure development and water resource planning. Conversely, countries like Zimbabwe, Iceland, and Zambia, with capacities of 7,347.32, 7,226.05, and 7,004.77 cubic meters per capita respectively, reflect investments in dam construction and water management strategies tailored to their unique geographic needs. The high capacity in nations such as Norway and Paraguay also indicates a balance between natural water availability and strategic infrastructure development.
Sustainability and Development Challenges
Countries with low dam capacity per capita face significant challenges in achieving water security. For nations like Somalia and Bhutan, zero capacity highlights a pressing need for investment in water infrastructure to mitigate the impacts of drought and ensure reliable access to water. Meanwhile, countries with high capacities, such as Suriname and Canada, must focus on sustainable management practices to prevent ecological disruption and address potential socio-environmental conflicts. The case of Laos, which saw a substantial increase of 419.36 cubic meters per capita (34.0%), exemplifies a positive trajectory towards enhancing water storage for agricultural and industrial use.
Recent Trends and Year-over-Year Changes
Between 2010 and 2011, the average global dam capacity per capita saw a slight decline of 13.68 cubic meters, marking a 0.8% drop. While many countries maintained stable capacities, others experienced notable fluctuations. Botswana and Vietnam, for instance, showed impressive increases of 187.35 (65.7%) and 180.88 (56.4%) cubic meters per capita, suggesting focused efforts in infrastructure expansion and resource management. In contrast, Suriname and Canada saw decreases of 414.90 (-1.1%) and 255.40 (-1.0%) cubic meters per capita, indicating possible environmental constraints or policy shifts impacting water storage capabilities.
Policy Impact and Future Prospects
Policy frameworks and international agreements play pivotal roles in shaping dam capacity per capita. Countries that prioritize integrated water resources management and invest in dam infrastructure can potentially enhance their capacity, thus supporting sustainable development goals. Future prospects hinge on addressing climate change impacts, optimizing water use efficiency, and fostering cross-border cooperation for transboundary water management. As water scarcity becomes a more pressing global challenge, maintaining and expanding dam capacity per capita will be integral to ensuring resilient water systems for future generations.
In conclusion, the 2011 landscape of dam capacity per capita provides insightful perspectives on the global state of water resource management. While some countries have harnessed their natural advantages to build robust water storage systems, others face significant hurdles that require strategic intervention and international collaboration. The continued evolution of this metric will be crucial for addressing the interconnected challenges of water security, environmental sustainability, and socioeconomic development.
Insights by country
Greece
In 2011, Greece ranked 40th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 1109.21 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is crucial for managing water resources in a nation characterized by a Mediterranean climate.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita in Greece can be attributed to its geographical features, including numerous rivers and mountainous terrain that facilitate the construction of dams. Additionally, the importance of agriculture and tourism in the Greek economy necessitates effective water management systems to support these sectors.
Moreover, Greece's historical reliance on hydroelectric power generation has also influenced the development of dam infrastructure, making it an integral part of the nation's energy strategy. This emphasis on water resource management is underscored by Greece's commitment to sustainable practices, particularly in light of challenges such as droughts and climate change.
Tunisia
Tunisia ranked 91st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 2011. The dam capacity per capita for Tunisia was measured at 232.075 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a moderate level of water storage capacity relative to its population size.
This statistic reflects Tunisia's reliance on water management systems to support its agriculture and urban needs, particularly given the country's arid climate. Factors contributing to this capacity include the construction of various dams and reservoirs aimed at optimizing water resources in a region characterized by limited rainfall.
Additionally, the country's water management strategies are critical for addressing challenges such as population growth and climate variability. Tunisia's dam infrastructure plays a crucial role in enhancing water availability, thereby supporting agricultural productivity and ensuring a stable supply for domestic consumption.
Norway
Norway ranks 6th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 6719.18 cubic meters per inhabitant as of 2011. This statistic highlights the country's extensive investment in hydroelectric power infrastructure, which is a cornerstone of its energy production strategy.
The high dam capacity per capita in Norway can be attributed to its abundant water resources, characterized by numerous rivers, lakes, and a rugged terrain that is conducive to dam construction. Norway is one of the world's leading producers of renewable energy, with hydropower accounting for over 95% of its electricity generation.
Additionally, this significant dam capacity reflects Norway's commitment to sustainable energy practices and its efforts to harness natural resources effectively. The emphasis on hydropower has not only contributed to energy security but has also positioned Norway as a model for other nations seeking to transition to renewable energy sources.
Congo
Congo ranked 150th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 2011. The dam capacity per capita for the country was recorded at 1.95239 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low figure reflects the limited development of hydropower infrastructure in the region, which has significant implications for energy access and economic growth.
Several factors contribute to this statistic, including the country's ongoing political instability, inadequate investment in infrastructure, and a lack of technological advancement in the energy sector. These challenges have hindered the potential for the development of hydroelectric projects that could harness the abundant water resources available in Congo.
Additionally, the reliance on traditional energy sources and the underutilization of renewable resources signify the need for strategic reforms and investments in the energy sector. In contrast, neighboring countries with more developed hydropower facilities have seen better energy access and economic outcomes, highlighting the importance of infrastructure development in fostering national growth.
Yemen
In 2011, Yemen ranked 136 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 16.7676 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the challenges Yemen faces in managing its water resources, particularly in a country where water scarcity is a critical issue.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including geographical limitations, political instability, and underinvestment in infrastructure. Yemen's arid climate and the ongoing conflict have significantly hampered the development and maintenance of water storage facilities, making it difficult to adequately supply the population.
Additionally, Yemen's water resources are further strained by factors such as rapid population growth and agricultural demands, which exacerbate the country's water crisis. As a result, the limited dam capacity contributes to the broader issues of water availability and access, posing serious implications for health, agriculture, and overall development.
Pakistan
In 2011, Pakistan ranked 107 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 136.485 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic illustrates the country's water resource management capabilities relative to its population size.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to a combination of factors, including infrastructure challenges, investment deficits, and climatic variability that affects water availability. Additionally, Pakistan's reliance on a limited number of major river systems, particularly the Indus River, further constrains its dam-building potential.
Interestingly, Pakistan's water resources are critical for its agricultural sector, which employs a significant portion of the population. Despite the challenges, the country has been making efforts to enhance its water storage capacity through various projects aimed at improving irrigation efficiency and dam construction.
Senegal
In 2011, Senegal ranked 135th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 19.2918 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the relatively limited water storage capacity available for each individual in the country, which is crucial for addressing water supply and management challenges.
The low dam capacity per capita in Senegal can be attributed to several factors, including geographical constraints, limited investment in water infrastructure, and a growing population that increases demand for water resources. Additionally, the country's climate variability impacts water availability, necessitating effective management of existing resources.
As a reference, countries with higher dam capacities often benefit from extensive hydropower projects or substantial investments in water infrastructure, which are essential for supporting agricultural activities and urban water supply. Senegal's situation underscores the importance of enhancing water resource management and infrastructure development to improve water security for its population.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria ranked 45th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 2011. The nation had a dam capacity of 883.249 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant investment in water resource management in comparison to many other countries.
This capacity reflects Bulgaria's diverse geography, which includes mountains and rivers that have been harnessed for hydroelectric power and irrigation. The extensive dam infrastructure is essential for managing water supply, flood control, and supporting agricultural needs, especially in a country where agriculture plays a vital role in the economy.
Factors contributing to this high dam capacity per capita include Bulgaria's historical emphasis on developing its hydroelectric resources and the necessity to stabilize water resources in a climate that can be variable. Moreover, Bulgaria has made efforts to modernize its water management systems, which has facilitated better resource allocation and sustainability.
Romania
In 2011, Romania ranked 60th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 545.429 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for both agricultural and energy production.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Romania's varied topography and hydrological resources, including numerous rivers and lakes that facilitate the construction of dams. Additionally, the country's efforts to harness hydroelectric power have led to the development of several large-scale dams, contributing to this metric.
Romania's emphasis on renewable energy sources, particularly hydroelectricity, is also noteworthy, as it aligns with broader European Union initiatives to enhance sustainable energy production. As a result, Romania's dam capacity plays a vital role in both its energy security and environmental sustainability efforts.
Luxembourg
In 2011, Luxembourg ranked 109th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 119.556 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management and infrastructure capabilities, which are essential for both agricultural and urban water supply.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Luxembourg's small geographical size and population density, which may limit the need for extensive dam infrastructure compared to larger countries. Additionally, the country's focus on sustainable development and efficient water usage may contribute to a lower reliance on large-scale dam projects.
It is noteworthy that Luxembourg is located in a region with a well-developed water management system, and its overall water resources are generally considered to be well managed. The country also benefits from a robust economy, which can facilitate investments in water infrastructure and technology.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data