Dam capacity per capita 1974

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
4,433.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Australia flag
Australia
4,224.09 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
1,810.09 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
521.517 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Angola flag
Angola
417.276 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
366.758 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Austria flag
Austria
198.343 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
161.118 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Algeria flag
Algeria
119.321 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
78.382 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
85.404 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
25,035.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,257.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Chile flag
Chile
917.042 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
624.247 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Botswana flag
Botswana
444.673 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
294.866 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
China flag
China
280.768 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Cuba flag
Cuba
263.322 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
211.104 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
65.143 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
55.914 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
39.437 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
35.294 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
18.091 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
6.501 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Congo flag
Congo
5.688 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2.358 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Egypt flag
Egypt
4,429.77 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
327.322 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
147.864 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
29.732 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ghana flag
Ghana
14,808.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
11,381 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iceland flag
Iceland
5,481.59 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Finland flag
Finland
3,946.61 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,544.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Greece flag
Greece
991.588 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
738.724 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Iran flag
Iran
391.257 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Ireland flag
Ireland
277.443 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Guyana flag
Guyana
271.185 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
India flag
India
221.986 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
France flag
France
170.076 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Liberia flag
Liberia
146.708 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Italy flag
Italy
142.314 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Japan flag
Japan
102.754 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
83.486 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Haiti flag
Haiti
59.379 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
59.002 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Guinea flag
Guinea
51.741 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Germany flag
Germany
34.343 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Honduras flag
Honduras
4.255 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.964 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Jordan flag
Jordan
3.589 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.737 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Hungary flag
Hungary
2.659 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.137 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.112 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Laos flag
Laos
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
84.878 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
11,701.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
7,603.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Norway flag
Norway
4,906.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Panama flag
Panama
3,456.73 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
2,282.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,480.21 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,067.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
653.571 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Namibia flag
Namibia
621.477 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Portugal flag
Portugal
616.767 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
475.97 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Morocco flag
Morocco
390.383 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
341.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Romania flag
Romania
259.975 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
213.473 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Peru flag
Peru
207.333 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
172.885 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
150.668 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
78.963 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
71.846 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
65.71 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Mali flag
Mali
26.059 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Malawi flag
Malawi
8.121 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
23.837 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Niger flag
Niger
4.323 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Poland flag
Poland
58.447 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Philippines flag
Philippines
38.859 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
62.448 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
50,803.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
19,866.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
16,525.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
7,002.28 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
6,482.09 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,275.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
3,979.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
3,094.97 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,695.24 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Spain flag
Spain
1,102.63 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Thailand flag
Thailand
991.493 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
576.684 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
568.606 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
527.251 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Turkey flag
Turkey
373.039 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
315.945 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
81.811 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
75.331 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
12.349 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
536.052 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
South Korea flag
South Korea
162.352 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
119.724 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
23.896 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
2.974 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.663 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  2. #2Australia flagAustralia
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  5. #5Angola flagAngola
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Austria flagAustria
  8. #8Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  9. #9Algeria flagAlgeria
  10. #10Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tunisia flagTunisia
  9. #156Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  10. #155Sudan flagSudan

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1974, the metric of dam capacity per capita, measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, emerged as a vital indicator of water resource management on a global scale. This statistic reflects the availability of water storage for individuals within a country, underscoring its significance for sustainability, development, and water security. It plays a crucial role in supporting agriculture, industry, and communities worldwide. Analyzing the dam capacity per capita offers insights into how different countries manage their water resources and highlights disparities that may affect economic and social development.

Global Disparities in Dam Capacity

In 1974, striking disparities in dam capacity per capita were evident across different regions and countries. Suriname led the world with a staggering 50,803.2 cubic meters per inhabitant, far exceeding the global average of 2,042.56. This remarkable figure reflects Suriname's extensive water resources and effective management strategies. Following Suriname, countries like Canada and Zambia also showcased high capacities of 25,035.4 and 19,866.5 cubic meters per person, respectively, indicating robust infrastructure and significant investments in water storage facilities.

Conversely, several countries reported minimal or zero dam capacity per capita. Nations such as Benin, Papua New Guinea, and Bhutan had no recorded capacity, highlighting potential challenges in water resource development and management. This lack of capacity emphasizes the need for infrastructural development to enhance water security and support sustainable growth.

Regional Water Resource Management

Examining the regional patterns of dam capacity per capita reveals insights into water resource management strategies and priorities. African nations like Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique demonstrated relatively high capacities, suggesting targeted efforts in water storage infrastructure to combat variability in rainfall and drought conditions. Mozambique, in particular, saw a substantial increase of 5,567.97 cubic meters per inhabitant, translating to an impressive 273.5% rise, indicative of significant infrastructural enhancements and strategic water management initiatives.

In contrast, countries in regions with abundant natural water resources, such as Scandinavia, showed moderate gains. For instance, Sweden experienced a modest increase of 291.21 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting incremental improvements in water storage capacity despite having a naturally water-rich environment.

Impact of Policy and Infrastructure

Changes in dam capacity per capita in 1974 were also influenced by national policies and infrastructure development. For example, Angola demonstrated a remarkable increase of 388.22 cubic meters per inhabitant, equivalent to a 1,336.3% surge, attributable to policy shifts focusing on enhancing water infrastructure to support agricultural expansion and population growth. Similarly, Australia's increase of 878.07 cubic meters per inhabitant (26.2%) highlights the country's ongoing commitment to bolstering water storage capabilities in response to climatic challenges and population demands.

However, some countries experienced declines in dam capacity per capita, highlighting potential issues in policy implementation or infrastructure maintenance. Zambia, for example, saw a decrease of 591.70 cubic meters per inhabitant (-2.9%), which could reflect challenges in sustaining existing facilities or shifts in water management priorities.

Sustainability and Development Concerns

The metric of dam capacity per capita in 1974 underscores critical concerns about sustainability and development. Countries with low or zero capacities face significant challenges in meeting the water needs of their populations, which can hinder economic growth and social development. Addressing these disparities requires strategic investments in water infrastructure and policy frameworks that prioritize sustainable resource management.

Furthermore, the variations in dam capacity per capita highlight the importance of international cooperation in water resource management, especially for countries with transboundary water systems. Initiatives aimed at sharing best practices and technologies can help bridge the gap between nations with differing capacities, fostering a more equitable and sustainable global water resource landscape.

Looking Forward

As the world progresses, the lessons learned from dam capacity per capita statistics in 1974 continue to be relevant. The need for sustainable water management practices and infrastructure development remains crucial for addressing contemporary challenges related to climate change, population growth, and resource scarcity. By examining historical data and trends, policymakers and stakeholders can better strategize for a future where water resources are managed responsibly, ensuring the well-being of both current and future generations.

Insights by country

1

Japan

In 1974, Japan ranked 73rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 102.754 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive investment in water infrastructure, which is crucial for managing both irrigation and urban water supply.

Several factors contribute to Japan's dam capacity per capita, including its mountainous terrain and the need for flood control due to seasonal heavy rainfall. The Japanese government has historically prioritized water resource management, leading to the construction of numerous dams across the archipelago to harness and regulate water flow.

Additionally, as a nation with limited land for agriculture, Japan's water management strategies have been essential for ensuring food security and supporting its industrial economy. As of the mid-1970s, the emphasis on infrastructure development also aligned with Japan's rapid economic growth during this period, further driving the need for enhanced water resource systems.

2

Cuba

Cuba ranked 56th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1974. The dam capacity stood at 263.322 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting significant investment in water infrastructure during this period.

This statistic is indicative of Cuba's focus on developing its hydrological resources to support agriculture and municipal water supply, particularly in the context of its socialist policies aimed at improving living standards. The government prioritized the construction of dams and reservoirs to manage water resources more effectively, especially given the island's tropical climate and seasonal rainfall variability.

Moreover, Cuba's ranking and dam capacity per capita may have been influenced by its geographical features, including a mountainous terrain that allows for the construction of reservoirs, and historical efforts to harness and utilize water resources for development. This emphasis on water infrastructure is crucial in a country where agriculture plays a significant role in the economy.

3

Spain

In 1974, Spain ranked 27th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 1102.63 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in hydraulic infrastructure during a period of industrialization and modernization.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Spain's geographical diversity and varying climate conditions, which necessitated comprehensive water management strategies. Key factors contributing to this capacity include the development of extensive irrigation systems, water storage projects, and the construction of large dams to support both agricultural and urban water needs.

Moreover, Spain's commitment to water resource management has historical roots, with practices dating back to ancient civilizations. The robust dam infrastructure not only supports agricultural productivity but also plays a crucial role in flood control and hydroelectric power generation, making it a vital component of the country's energy landscape.

4

Seychelles

In 1974, Seychelles ranked 154th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates that the country had no significant dam infrastructure for water storage relative to its population at that time.

The lack of dam capacity suggests limited investments in water management systems, which could have been influenced by the country's geographical characteristics, economic constraints, and developmental priorities during the mid-20th century. Seychelles, an archipelago in the Indian Ocean, faces unique challenges in implementing large-scale water projects due to its dispersed islands and environmental considerations.

Additionally, this situation highlights potential vulnerabilities in water supply and management, which are critical for a small island nation with a growing population reliant on both tourism and agriculture. Overall, the historical context of Seychelles’ water infrastructure reflects broader trends in regional development and resource allocation during that period.

5

Norway

In 1974, Norway ranked 12th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a remarkable figure of 4906.13 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high dam capacity is indicative of Norway's extensive investment in hydropower infrastructure, which has been a cornerstone of its energy policy and economic strategy.

The country's geography, characterized by numerous rivers and lakes, provides an ideal environment for dam construction, enabling Norway to harness its abundant water resources effectively. Additionally, the focus on renewable energy sources during this period was influenced by a growing global awareness of environmental issues and the need for sustainable energy alternatives.

Furthermore, Norway's commitment to hydropower has led to it becoming one of the world leaders in the production of renewable energy, with hydropower accounting for over 95% of its electricity generation. This statistic not only underscores the efficiency of Norway's energy sector but also reflects its strategic approach to managing natural resources sustainably.

6

Malta

In 1974, Malta ranked 139th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant limitation in the availability of water storage infrastructure relative to its population.

The lack of dam capacity per capita in Malta can be attributed to several factors, including the country's small land area, geographical constraints, and limited freshwater resources. As an island nation in the Mediterranean Sea, Malta relies heavily on desalination and groundwater extraction to meet its water needs, rather than large-scale dam projects.

Interestingly, Malta's reliance on alternative water sources highlights the challenges faced by many small island nations, where traditional methods of water storage and management may not be feasible. This situation underscores the importance of innovative water management practices in addressing water scarcity issues, particularly in densely populated areas.

7

Vietnam

In 1974, Vietnam achieved a notable ranking of 38 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The dam capacity per capita in Vietnam was measured at 568.606 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant level of water resource management for the population at that time.

This relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's extensive hydrological resources and the prioritization of irrigation and flood management systems, especially in the context of its agricultural economy. The development of dams was crucial for rice cultivation, which is a staple of Vietnamese agriculture.

Additionally, the period surrounding 1974 was marked by significant challenges, including the Vietnam War and subsequent reconstruction efforts, during which water management infrastructure was vital for sustaining agricultural output and rebuilding the economy. The emphasis on dam construction and water resource management has continued to play a critical role in Vietnam's development strategy.

8

Finland

In 1974, Finland ranked 19th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a substantial capacity of 3,946.61 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high figure reflects Finland's extensive investment in hydroelectric power and water management systems, which are critical for the country's energy production and flood control measures.

The significant dam capacity in Finland can be attributed to its abundant water resources, characterized by numerous lakes and rivers. The country's geographical features facilitate the development of hydroelectric facilities, which have become a cornerstone of Finland's renewable energy strategy. Additionally, the government has historically prioritized sustainable development, leading to a robust infrastructure that supports hydropower generation.

As a point of interest, Finland's commitment to renewable energy sources continues to this day, with hydropower accounting for a considerable share of its electricity generation. This focus on sustainable energy is indicative of Finland's broader environmental policies aiming to reduce carbon emissions and promote ecological preservation.

9

Tanzania

Tanzania ranked 10th out of 164 countries in dam capacity per capita in 1974, with a significant value of 6482.09 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high dam capacity indicates a well-developed infrastructure for water storage, which is crucial for both agricultural and domestic water supply in the country.

The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Tanzania's investment in water resource management and the establishment of several large-scale dams to support agriculture, particularly in arid regions. Such infrastructure not only facilitates irrigation for crops but also contributes to hydroelectric power generation, which is vital for the country's energy needs.

Additionally, it is important to note that this capacity reflects Tanzania's rich water resources, including significant rivers and lakes, which provide ample opportunities for dam construction. This figure from 1974 set a foundation for sustainable development in water management, contributing to the country's overall economic growth and enhancing food security.

10

Madagascar

In 1974, Madagascar ranked 82nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 65.7095 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water infrastructure and its approach to managing water resources, crucial for agriculture and domestic use.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Madagascar's unique geographical features, including its diverse hydrological systems, which have made it possible to harness water resources effectively. Additionally, the country's focus on developing irrigation systems for its predominantly agrarian economy has contributed to this capacity.

Interestingly, the management of water resources in Madagascar faces challenges such as climate variability and environmental degradation, which can impact the effectiveness of existing dam infrastructure. Furthermore, as a nation with a high dependence on agriculture, the ability to store and manage water resources efficiently remains essential for food security and economic stability.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts