Dam capacity per capita 1974
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Côte d'Ivoire | 4,433.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Australia | 4,224.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 1,810.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Bulgaria | 521.517 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Angola | 417.276 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 366.758 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Austria | 198.343 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Afghanistan | 161.118 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Algeria | 119.321 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Antigua and Barbuda | 78.382 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Bangladesh | 85.404 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Canada | 25,035.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Brazil | 4,257.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Chile | 917.042 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Cameroon | 624.247 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Botswana | 444.673 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Brunei Darussalam | 294.866 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | China | 280.768 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Cuba | 263.322 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Colombia | 211.104 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Cyprus | 65.143 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Bolivia | 55.914 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Burkina Faso | 39.437 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Dominican Republic | 35.294 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Costa Rica | 18.091 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 6.501 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Congo | 5.688 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.358 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Benin | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Egypt | 4,429.77 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | El Salvador | 327.322 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Eswatini | 147.864 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Ecuador | 29.732 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Ghana | 14,808.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Iraq | 11,381 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Iceland | 5,481.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Finland | 3,946.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Kenya | 1,544.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Greece | 991.588 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Lesotho | 738.724 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Iran | 391.257 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Ireland | 277.443 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Guyana | 271.185 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | India | 221.986 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | France | 170.076 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Liberia | 146.708 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Italy | 142.314 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Japan | 102.754 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Lebanon | 83.486 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Haiti | 59.379 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Indonesia | 59.002 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Guinea | 51.741 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Germany | 34.343 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Honduras | 4.255 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Denmark | 3.964 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Jordan | 3.589 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Jamaica | 2.737 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Hungary | 2.659 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Guatemala | 0.137 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Fiji | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Gabon | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Grenada | 0.112 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Laos | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 84.878 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 11,701.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Mozambique | 7,603.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Norway | 4,906.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Panama | 3,456.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | New Zealand | 2,282.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Mexico | 1,480.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | North Korea | 1,067.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Malaysia | 653.571 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Namibia | 621.477 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Portugal | 616.767 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Netherlands | 475.97 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Morocco | 390.383 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Nigeria | 341.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Romania | 259.975 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Pakistan | 213.473 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Peru | 207.333 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Mongolia | 172.885 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Luxembourg | 150.668 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Myanmar | 78.963 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Mauritius | 71.846 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Madagascar | 65.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Mali | 26.059 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Malawi | 8.121 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Saint Lucia | 23.837 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Niger | 4.323 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Nepal | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Poland | 58.447 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Philippines | 38.859 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Paraguay | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 62.448 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 50,803.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 19,866.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 16,525.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uganda | 7,002.28 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Tanzania | 6,482.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Sweden | 4,275.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Uruguay | 3,979.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 3,094.97 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,695.24 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Spain | 1,102.63 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Thailand | 991.493 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Venezuela | 576.684 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Vietnam | 568.606 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Switzerland | 527.251 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Turkey | 373.039 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Sri Lanka | 315.945 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 81.811 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 75.331 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 12.349 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 536.052 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | South Korea | 162.352 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tunisia | 119.724 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 23.896 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 2.974 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.663 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Côte d'Ivoire
- #2
Australia
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Bulgaria
- #5
Angola
- #6
Albania
- #7
Austria
- #8
Afghanistan
- #9
Algeria
- #10
Antigua and Barbuda
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tunisia
- #156
Tajikistan
- #155
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1974, the metric of dam capacity per capita, measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, emerged as a vital indicator of water resource management on a global scale. This statistic reflects the availability of water storage for individuals within a country, underscoring its significance for sustainability, development, and water security. It plays a crucial role in supporting agriculture, industry, and communities worldwide. Analyzing the dam capacity per capita offers insights into how different countries manage their water resources and highlights disparities that may affect economic and social development.
Global Disparities in Dam Capacity
In 1974, striking disparities in dam capacity per capita were evident across different regions and countries. Suriname led the world with a staggering 50,803.2 cubic meters per inhabitant, far exceeding the global average of 2,042.56. This remarkable figure reflects Suriname's extensive water resources and effective management strategies. Following Suriname, countries like Canada and Zambia also showcased high capacities of 25,035.4 and 19,866.5 cubic meters per person, respectively, indicating robust infrastructure and significant investments in water storage facilities.
Conversely, several countries reported minimal or zero dam capacity per capita. Nations such as Benin, Papua New Guinea, and Bhutan had no recorded capacity, highlighting potential challenges in water resource development and management. This lack of capacity emphasizes the need for infrastructural development to enhance water security and support sustainable growth.
Regional Water Resource Management
Examining the regional patterns of dam capacity per capita reveals insights into water resource management strategies and priorities. African nations like Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique demonstrated relatively high capacities, suggesting targeted efforts in water storage infrastructure to combat variability in rainfall and drought conditions. Mozambique, in particular, saw a substantial increase of 5,567.97 cubic meters per inhabitant, translating to an impressive 273.5% rise, indicative of significant infrastructural enhancements and strategic water management initiatives.
In contrast, countries in regions with abundant natural water resources, such as Scandinavia, showed moderate gains. For instance, Sweden experienced a modest increase of 291.21 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting incremental improvements in water storage capacity despite having a naturally water-rich environment.
Impact of Policy and Infrastructure
Changes in dam capacity per capita in 1974 were also influenced by national policies and infrastructure development. For example, Angola demonstrated a remarkable increase of 388.22 cubic meters per inhabitant, equivalent to a 1,336.3% surge, attributable to policy shifts focusing on enhancing water infrastructure to support agricultural expansion and population growth. Similarly, Australia's increase of 878.07 cubic meters per inhabitant (26.2%) highlights the country's ongoing commitment to bolstering water storage capabilities in response to climatic challenges and population demands.
However, some countries experienced declines in dam capacity per capita, highlighting potential issues in policy implementation or infrastructure maintenance. Zambia, for example, saw a decrease of 591.70 cubic meters per inhabitant (-2.9%), which could reflect challenges in sustaining existing facilities or shifts in water management priorities.
Sustainability and Development Concerns
The metric of dam capacity per capita in 1974 underscores critical concerns about sustainability and development. Countries with low or zero capacities face significant challenges in meeting the water needs of their populations, which can hinder economic growth and social development. Addressing these disparities requires strategic investments in water infrastructure and policy frameworks that prioritize sustainable resource management.
Furthermore, the variations in dam capacity per capita highlight the importance of international cooperation in water resource management, especially for countries with transboundary water systems. Initiatives aimed at sharing best practices and technologies can help bridge the gap between nations with differing capacities, fostering a more equitable and sustainable global water resource landscape.
Looking Forward
As the world progresses, the lessons learned from dam capacity per capita statistics in 1974 continue to be relevant. The need for sustainable water management practices and infrastructure development remains crucial for addressing contemporary challenges related to climate change, population growth, and resource scarcity. By examining historical data and trends, policymakers and stakeholders can better strategize for a future where water resources are managed responsibly, ensuring the well-being of both current and future generations.
Insights by country
Japan
In 1974, Japan ranked 73rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 102.754 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive investment in water infrastructure, which is crucial for managing both irrigation and urban water supply.
Several factors contribute to Japan's dam capacity per capita, including its mountainous terrain and the need for flood control due to seasonal heavy rainfall. The Japanese government has historically prioritized water resource management, leading to the construction of numerous dams across the archipelago to harness and regulate water flow.
Additionally, as a nation with limited land for agriculture, Japan's water management strategies have been essential for ensuring food security and supporting its industrial economy. As of the mid-1970s, the emphasis on infrastructure development also aligned with Japan's rapid economic growth during this period, further driving the need for enhanced water resource systems.
Cuba
Cuba ranked 56th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1974. The dam capacity stood at 263.322 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting significant investment in water infrastructure during this period.
This statistic is indicative of Cuba's focus on developing its hydrological resources to support agriculture and municipal water supply, particularly in the context of its socialist policies aimed at improving living standards. The government prioritized the construction of dams and reservoirs to manage water resources more effectively, especially given the island's tropical climate and seasonal rainfall variability.
Moreover, Cuba's ranking and dam capacity per capita may have been influenced by its geographical features, including a mountainous terrain that allows for the construction of reservoirs, and historical efforts to harness and utilize water resources for development. This emphasis on water infrastructure is crucial in a country where agriculture plays a significant role in the economy.
Spain
In 1974, Spain ranked 27th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 1102.63 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in hydraulic infrastructure during a period of industrialization and modernization.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Spain's geographical diversity and varying climate conditions, which necessitated comprehensive water management strategies. Key factors contributing to this capacity include the development of extensive irrigation systems, water storage projects, and the construction of large dams to support both agricultural and urban water needs.
Moreover, Spain's commitment to water resource management has historical roots, with practices dating back to ancient civilizations. The robust dam infrastructure not only supports agricultural productivity but also plays a crucial role in flood control and hydroelectric power generation, making it a vital component of the country's energy landscape.
Seychelles
In 1974, Seychelles ranked 154th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates that the country had no significant dam infrastructure for water storage relative to its population at that time.
The lack of dam capacity suggests limited investments in water management systems, which could have been influenced by the country's geographical characteristics, economic constraints, and developmental priorities during the mid-20th century. Seychelles, an archipelago in the Indian Ocean, faces unique challenges in implementing large-scale water projects due to its dispersed islands and environmental considerations.
Additionally, this situation highlights potential vulnerabilities in water supply and management, which are critical for a small island nation with a growing population reliant on both tourism and agriculture. Overall, the historical context of Seychelles’ water infrastructure reflects broader trends in regional development and resource allocation during that period.
Norway
In 1974, Norway ranked 12th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a remarkable figure of 4906.13 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high dam capacity is indicative of Norway's extensive investment in hydropower infrastructure, which has been a cornerstone of its energy policy and economic strategy.
The country's geography, characterized by numerous rivers and lakes, provides an ideal environment for dam construction, enabling Norway to harness its abundant water resources effectively. Additionally, the focus on renewable energy sources during this period was influenced by a growing global awareness of environmental issues and the need for sustainable energy alternatives.
Furthermore, Norway's commitment to hydropower has led to it becoming one of the world leaders in the production of renewable energy, with hydropower accounting for over 95% of its electricity generation. This statistic not only underscores the efficiency of Norway's energy sector but also reflects its strategic approach to managing natural resources sustainably.
Malta
In 1974, Malta ranked 139th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant limitation in the availability of water storage infrastructure relative to its population.
The lack of dam capacity per capita in Malta can be attributed to several factors, including the country's small land area, geographical constraints, and limited freshwater resources. As an island nation in the Mediterranean Sea, Malta relies heavily on desalination and groundwater extraction to meet its water needs, rather than large-scale dam projects.
Interestingly, Malta's reliance on alternative water sources highlights the challenges faced by many small island nations, where traditional methods of water storage and management may not be feasible. This situation underscores the importance of innovative water management practices in addressing water scarcity issues, particularly in densely populated areas.
Vietnam
In 1974, Vietnam achieved a notable ranking of 38 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The dam capacity per capita in Vietnam was measured at 568.606 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant level of water resource management for the population at that time.
This relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's extensive hydrological resources and the prioritization of irrigation and flood management systems, especially in the context of its agricultural economy. The development of dams was crucial for rice cultivation, which is a staple of Vietnamese agriculture.
Additionally, the period surrounding 1974 was marked by significant challenges, including the Vietnam War and subsequent reconstruction efforts, during which water management infrastructure was vital for sustaining agricultural output and rebuilding the economy. The emphasis on dam construction and water resource management has continued to play a critical role in Vietnam's development strategy.
Finland
In 1974, Finland ranked 19th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a substantial capacity of 3,946.61 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high figure reflects Finland's extensive investment in hydroelectric power and water management systems, which are critical for the country's energy production and flood control measures.
The significant dam capacity in Finland can be attributed to its abundant water resources, characterized by numerous lakes and rivers. The country's geographical features facilitate the development of hydroelectric facilities, which have become a cornerstone of Finland's renewable energy strategy. Additionally, the government has historically prioritized sustainable development, leading to a robust infrastructure that supports hydropower generation.
As a point of interest, Finland's commitment to renewable energy sources continues to this day, with hydropower accounting for a considerable share of its electricity generation. This focus on sustainable energy is indicative of Finland's broader environmental policies aiming to reduce carbon emissions and promote ecological preservation.
Tanzania
Tanzania ranked 10th out of 164 countries in dam capacity per capita in 1974, with a significant value of 6482.09 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high dam capacity indicates a well-developed infrastructure for water storage, which is crucial for both agricultural and domestic water supply in the country.
The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Tanzania's investment in water resource management and the establishment of several large-scale dams to support agriculture, particularly in arid regions. Such infrastructure not only facilitates irrigation for crops but also contributes to hydroelectric power generation, which is vital for the country's energy needs.
Additionally, it is important to note that this capacity reflects Tanzania's rich water resources, including significant rivers and lakes, which provide ample opportunities for dam construction. This figure from 1974 set a foundation for sustainable development in water management, contributing to the country's overall economic growth and enhancing food security.
Madagascar
In 1974, Madagascar ranked 82nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 65.7095 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water infrastructure and its approach to managing water resources, crucial for agriculture and domestic use.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Madagascar's unique geographical features, including its diverse hydrological systems, which have made it possible to harness water resources effectively. Additionally, the country's focus on developing irrigation systems for its predominantly agrarian economy has contributed to this capacity.
Interestingly, the management of water resources in Madagascar faces challenges such as climate variability and environmental degradation, which can impact the effectiveness of existing dam infrastructure. Furthermore, as a nation with a high dependence on agriculture, the ability to store and manage water resources efficiently remains essential for food security and economic stability.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data