Dam capacity per capita 1976

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
4,308.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
4,080.63 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
1,985.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
612.482 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Angola flag
Angola
610.863 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
350.517 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Austria flag
Austria
215.878 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
153.83 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Algeria flag
Algeria
110.045 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
78.746 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
81.109 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
26,390.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,059.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Chile flag
Chile
891.747 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
591.023 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Botswana flag
Botswana
401.842 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Cuba flag
Cuba
309.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
China flag
China
280.251 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
275.129 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
202.031 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
133.974 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
69.771 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
65.263 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
53.424 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
17.181 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
6.474 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Congo flag
Congo
5.398 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2.238 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Egypt flag
Egypt
4,226.52 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
313.279 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
139.291 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
28.098 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ghana flag
Ghana
13,977.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
10,655.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iceland flag
Iceland
5,359.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Finland flag
Finland
3,936.86 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Laos flag
Laos
2,293.73 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,446.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Greece flag
Greece
1,051.72 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
691.099 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Iran flag
Iran
458.442 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Ireland flag
Ireland
269.174 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Guyana flag
Guyana
266.067 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
India flag
India
223.721 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
France flag
France
169.803 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Italy flag
Italy
143.128 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Liberia flag
Liberia
138.958 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Japan flag
Japan
104.201 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
80.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Haiti flag
Haiti
57.133 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
56.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Guinea flag
Guinea
50.137 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Germany flag
Germany
37.647 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Honduras flag
Honduras
7.646 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.943 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Jordan flag
Jordan
3.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.664 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Hungary flag
Hungary
2.629 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.131 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.113 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
75.863 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
11,009.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
7,345.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Norway flag
Norway
5,315.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
5,070.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Panama flag
Panama
4,803.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,424.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,034.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
623.023 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Portugal flag
Portugal
612.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Namibia flag
Namibia
588.97 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
508.695 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
468.134 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Morocco flag
Morocco
371.716 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
367.982 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Romania flag
Romania
273.606 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Peru flag
Peru
253.613 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
163.191 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
150.048 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
78.389 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
69.978 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
61.862 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Mali flag
Mali
25.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Malawi flag
Malawi
7.671 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
23.127 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Niger flag
Niger
4.093 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Poland flag
Poland
57.332 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Philippines flag
Philippines
37.036 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
56.948 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
51,508 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
18,703.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
15,663.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
6,646.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
6,034.63 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,299.72 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
3,927.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
3,073.18 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,611.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,104.77 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Spain flag
Spain
1,094.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Thailand flag
Thailand
945.497 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
545.191 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
541.758 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
530.499 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
304.699 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
85.867 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
72.636 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
25.253 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
529.59 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
South Korea flag
South Korea
158.034 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
133.082 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
23.323 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
2.832 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.625 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  5. #5Angola flagAngola
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Austria flagAustria
  8. #8Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  9. #9Algeria flagAlgeria
  10. #10Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tunisia flagTunisia
  9. #156Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  10. #155Sudan flagSudan

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1976, the concept of dam capacity per capita emerged as a vital metric for assessing the availability of water resources per individual in various countries. Expressed in cubic meters, this statistic serves as a crucial indicator of a nation's water resource management capabilities and its implications for sustainability, agricultural support, and community development. Understanding the dam capacity per capita provides insights into how countries tackle water security challenges and prioritize resource allocation to support economic growth and population needs.

Global Water Storage Insights in 1976

The analysis of dam capacity per capita in 1976 reveals significant disparities across the globe. Out of the 122 countries with available data, the range of water storage varied dramatically, from a minimum value of virtually zero to a staggering maximum of 51,508 cubic meters per inhabitant. This wide disparity underscores the uneven distribution of water resources worldwide, influenced by both geographical factors and strategic management policies. The average global dam capacity stood at 2,057.27 cubic meters per person, with a median of 223.72, highlighting that a majority of the population had limited water storage access, with only a few countries enjoying high per capita water availability.

Top Performing Countries

In 1976, Suriname led the world with a dam capacity per capita of 51,508 cubic meters, a testament to its abundant water resources and efficient resource management. Similarly, Canada followed with 26,390.1 cubic meters per inhabitant, benefiting from its vast freshwater reserves. African nations, such as Zambia (18,703.6) and Zimbabwe (15,663.1), also featured prominently in the top rankings, reflecting regional water management initiatives. Interestingly, countries like Ghana and Iraq, with capacities of 13,977.4 and 10,655.9 respectively, demonstrated their efforts in enhancing water storage to support agricultural and industrial activities.

Countries with Limited Capacity

Conversely, several countries reported negligible or zero dam capacity per capita, indicating potential vulnerabilities in water security. Papua New Guinea, Belize, and Rwanda, among others, recorded no measurable dam capacity, highlighting the absence of significant water storage infrastructure. Such limitations could impact agricultural productivity and community water access, necessitating strategic investments in dam construction and water resource development to mitigate scarcity and enhance resilience against droughts or seasonal variations.

Analyzing the changes from the previous year, 1976 saw varied trends in dam capacity per capita across different nations. Notably, New Zealand experienced a remarkable increase of 1,982.75 cubic meters (64.2%), illustrating significant advancements in water storage infrastructure. Similarly, Panama saw a 42.6% rise, showcasing its commitment to improving water management systems. However, some countries faced declines; Zambia, for instance, recorded a decrease of 576.30 cubic meters (-3.0%), and Ghana experienced a reduction of 408.10 cubic meters (-2.8%). These decreases could be attributed to changing climatic conditions, increased demand, or shifts in water management strategies.

Geographic Distribution and Regional Insights

The geographic distribution of dam capacity per capita in 1976 highlights distinct patterns, often influenced by natural water endowments and regional policy priorities. The African continent exhibited a mix of high and low capacities, reflecting both the availability of natural resources and the varied implementation of water management policies. North America, with Canada as a prime example, demonstrated a high per capita capacity, aligning with its extensive freshwater systems. In contrast, several Asian and Pacific nations, such as Nepal and Fiji, recorded minimal capacities, suggesting a need for enhanced water storage infrastructure to support growing populations and economic activities.

Overall, the 1976 global landscape of dam capacity per capita underscores the essential role of strategic water management in achieving sustainability and supporting societal needs. As nations continue to grapple with climate variability and increasing demands on water resources, understanding these distribution patterns can inform policy-making and foster international cooperation to ensure equitable water access and long-term resource security.

Insights by country

1

Turkey

In 1976, Turkey ranked 28th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1104.77 cubic meters per inhabitant. This significant figure reflects Turkey's emphasis on water resource management and infrastructure development during a period of rapid economic growth.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Turkey's geographical features, which include numerous rivers and mountainous terrains conducive to the construction of dams. Additionally, the government's investment in hydroelectric projects aimed to harness the country's water resources for energy production and irrigation, further enhancing the capacity statistics.

Turkey's extensive network of dams has played a crucial role in supporting its agricultural sector and providing electricity, particularly in rural areas. As of the mid-1970s, the country was actively expanding its dam infrastructure, which has continued to impact its economic and environmental policies in subsequent decades.

2

Oman

In 1976, Oman ranked 144th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population, highlighting challenges in water resource management during that period.

The low dam capacity per capita in Oman can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic and climatic conditions, which feature arid landscapes and limited freshwater sources. Additionally, the development of water infrastructure in Oman was still in its nascent stages in the mid-1970s, as the country was undergoing modernization and economic reforms following the Sultanate's rise in the late 20th century.

As a result, the lack of dam capacity not only affected the availability of water for agricultural purposes but also posed challenges for urban development and population growth. Over the subsequent decades, Oman has made significant investments in water infrastructure, resulting in improved water management practices and increased dam capacity, reflecting the country's commitment to addressing its water scarcity issues.

3

Syrian Arab Republic

The Syrian Arab Republic ranked 25th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1976, with a notable capacity of 1611.37 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure during this period, aimed at supporting its agricultural sector and urban development.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including Syria's geographical characteristics that allow for dam construction and the strategic importance of water resources in a predominantly arid region. The country has a history of utilizing its rivers, particularly the Euphrates, for irrigation and hydroelectric power generation, which has further enhanced its water storage capabilities.

In the broader context, this statistic illustrates Syria's early efforts to harness water resources effectively, which were crucial for sustaining its population and economy. However, the political and environmental challenges that have arisen in subsequent decades have significantly impacted these water resources and their management.

4

Congo

In 1976, Congo ranked 104th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 5.39819 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's ability to harness and store water resources, which is crucial for agriculture, energy production, and domestic use.

The relatively modest dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited infrastructure development and historical political instability, which hindered investments in large-scale water management projects. Additionally, the country's vast river systems, such as the Congo River, have not been fully utilized for hydroelectric power generation and irrigation.

Interestingly, despite the challenges, Congo has significant potential for hydropower development, as it possesses some of the largest hydroelectric plants in Africa. Enhancing dam capacity could play a vital role in addressing energy needs and improving economic conditions in the region.

5

Germany

In 1976, Germany ranked 93rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 37.6466 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's extensive network of dams and reservoirs, which are integral to its water management and flood control strategies.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Germany's geographical landscape and population density, which necessitate efficient water resource management. The country has historically invested in infrastructure development, particularly in the aftermath of World War II, which resulted in the construction of numerous dams to support industrial growth and agricultural irrigation.

Moreover, Germany's commitment to environmental sustainability and flood prevention has influenced its dam construction policies, focusing not only on capacity but also on ecological impacts. As a result, while the dam capacity per capita may appear modest, it plays a critical role in supporting both the economy and the environment.

6

Zambia

Zambia ranked third out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1976, with a remarkable capacity of 18,703.6 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high figure reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure, which are crucial for its energy needs and agricultural irrigation.

The extensive dam capacity can be attributed to Zambia's abundant water resources, primarily from the Zambezi River and its tributaries, which have been harnessed for both power generation and storage. Additionally, the emphasis on hydropower during this period was driven by the need for sustainable energy sources to support industrial growth and rural development.

Interestingly, Zambia's focus on exploiting its water resources for energy has positioned it as a leading player in the Southern African region's energy landscape. This historical context of high dam capacity per capita underscores the importance of water management in national development strategies during the mid-20th century.

7

Uruguay

In 1976, Uruguay ranked 21st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3,927.58 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's robust infrastructure for water management, which is vital for both agricultural and urban needs.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Uruguay's geographical features, which include numerous rivers and a favorable climate for hydropower generation. The country's investment in hydropower has enabled it to harness these natural resources effectively, contributing to its energy security and economic stability.

Additionally, Uruguay's focus on sustainable water management practices and the development of its hydroelectric facilities have played a crucial role in maintaining this capacity. It is noteworthy that this emphasis on renewable energy sources has positioned Uruguay as a leader in sustainable practices in the region, with hydropower accounting for a significant portion of its electricity generation.

8

Singapore

In 1976, Singapore ranked 96th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded capacity of 25.2527 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, crucial for a nation with limited natural freshwater resources.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Singapore's high population density and geographic constraints, which necessitate efficient water use and innovative solutions such as desalination and rainwater harvesting. The government has implemented comprehensive water management policies to address the challenges posed by its urban environment.

Interestingly, Singapore's efforts in water sustainability have positioned the country as a leader in water technology and innovation, demonstrating a shift from reliance on traditional dam infrastructure to more modern and sustainable practices in water management.

9

Serbia

In 1976, Serbia ranked 153rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant lack of large-scale water infrastructure development relative to its population at that time.

The limited dam capacity per capita could be attributed to a variety of factors, including historical economic challenges, political instability, and the prioritization of other infrastructural needs over water management and hydropower development during that period. Furthermore, the socio-political landscape of the former Yugoslavia, of which Serbia was a part, may have influenced investment decisions in water resources management.

Interestingly, Serbia's ranking reflects broader regional trends in Eastern Europe during the 1970s, where many countries faced similar challenges in developing adequate water resource infrastructure. This statistic highlights the ongoing importance of investing in water management systems for sustainable development and improved quality of life.

10

Cyprus

In 1976, Cyprus had a dam capacity per capita of 65.2627 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 85th out of 164 countries in terms of this statistic. This relatively moderate capacity reflects the island's geographical characteristics and the management of its water resources, which are essential for both agricultural and domestic use.

The dam capacity per capita can be influenced by various factors, including the availability of natural water sources, historical rainfall patterns, and the development of infrastructure for water storage. In Cyprus, the need for effective water management has been critical due to its Mediterranean climate, which features hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters.

Additionally, during the mid-1970s, Cyprus was undergoing significant socio-political changes, including the aftermath of the Turkish invasion in 1974, which may have impacted resource allocation and infrastructure development. Such circumstances often lead to a focus on maintaining and enhancing water supply systems to support both the local population and agricultural needs.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts