Dam capacity per capita 1976
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Australia | 4,308.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Côte d'Ivoire | 4,080.63 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 1,985.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Bulgaria | 612.482 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Angola | 610.863 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 350.517 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Austria | 215.878 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Afghanistan | 153.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Algeria | 110.045 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Antigua and Barbuda | 78.746 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Bangladesh | 81.109 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Canada | 26,390.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Brazil | 4,059.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Chile | 891.747 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Cameroon | 591.023 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Botswana | 401.842 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Cuba | 309.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | China | 280.251 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Brunei Darussalam | 275.129 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Colombia | 202.031 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Burkina Faso | 133.974 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Dominican Republic | 69.771 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Cyprus | 65.263 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Bolivia | 53.424 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Costa Rica | 17.181 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 6.474 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Congo | 5.398 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.238 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Benin | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Egypt | 4,226.52 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | El Salvador | 313.279 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Eswatini | 139.291 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Ecuador | 28.098 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Ghana | 13,977.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Iraq | 10,655.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Iceland | 5,359.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Finland | 3,936.86 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Laos | 2,293.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Kenya | 1,446.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Greece | 1,051.72 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Lesotho | 691.099 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Iran | 458.442 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Ireland | 269.174 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Guyana | 266.067 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | India | 223.721 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | France | 169.803 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Italy | 143.128 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Liberia | 138.958 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Japan | 104.201 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lebanon | 80.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Haiti | 57.133 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Indonesia | 56.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Guinea | 50.137 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Germany | 37.647 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Honduras | 7.646 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Denmark | 3.943 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Jordan | 3.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Jamaica | 2.664 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Hungary | 2.629 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Guatemala | 0.131 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Fiji | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Gabon | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Grenada | 0.113 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 75.863 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 11,009.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Mozambique | 7,345.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Norway | 5,315.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | New Zealand | 5,070.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Panama | 4,803.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Mexico | 1,424.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | North Korea | 1,034.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Malaysia | 623.023 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Portugal | 612.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Namibia | 588.97 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Nigeria | 508.695 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Netherlands | 468.134 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Morocco | 371.716 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Pakistan | 367.982 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Romania | 273.606 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Peru | 253.613 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Mongolia | 163.191 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Luxembourg | 150.048 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Myanmar | 78.389 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Mauritius | 69.978 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Madagascar | 61.862 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Mali | 25.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Malawi | 7.671 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Saint Lucia | 23.127 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Niger | 4.093 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Nepal | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Poland | 57.332 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Philippines | 37.036 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Paraguay | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 56.948 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 51,508 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 18,703.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 15,663.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uganda | 6,646.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Tanzania | 6,034.63 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Sweden | 4,299.72 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Uruguay | 3,927.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 3,073.18 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,611.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Turkey | 1,104.77 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Spain | 1,094.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Thailand | 945.497 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Venezuela | 545.191 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Vietnam | 541.758 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Switzerland | 530.499 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Sri Lanka | 304.699 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 85.867 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 72.636 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 25.253 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 529.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | South Korea | 158.034 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tunisia | 133.082 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 23.323 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 2.832 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.625 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Australia
- #2
Côte d'Ivoire
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Bulgaria
- #5
Angola
- #6
Albania
- #7
Austria
- #8
Afghanistan
- #9
Algeria
- #10
Antigua and Barbuda
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tunisia
- #156
Tajikistan
- #155
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1976, the concept of dam capacity per capita emerged as a vital metric for assessing the availability of water resources per individual in various countries. Expressed in cubic meters, this statistic serves as a crucial indicator of a nation's water resource management capabilities and its implications for sustainability, agricultural support, and community development. Understanding the dam capacity per capita provides insights into how countries tackle water security challenges and prioritize resource allocation to support economic growth and population needs.
Global Water Storage Insights in 1976
The analysis of dam capacity per capita in 1976 reveals significant disparities across the globe. Out of the 122 countries with available data, the range of water storage varied dramatically, from a minimum value of virtually zero to a staggering maximum of 51,508 cubic meters per inhabitant. This wide disparity underscores the uneven distribution of water resources worldwide, influenced by both geographical factors and strategic management policies. The average global dam capacity stood at 2,057.27 cubic meters per person, with a median of 223.72, highlighting that a majority of the population had limited water storage access, with only a few countries enjoying high per capita water availability.
Top Performing Countries
In 1976, Suriname led the world with a dam capacity per capita of 51,508 cubic meters, a testament to its abundant water resources and efficient resource management. Similarly, Canada followed with 26,390.1 cubic meters per inhabitant, benefiting from its vast freshwater reserves. African nations, such as Zambia (18,703.6) and Zimbabwe (15,663.1), also featured prominently in the top rankings, reflecting regional water management initiatives. Interestingly, countries like Ghana and Iraq, with capacities of 13,977.4 and 10,655.9 respectively, demonstrated their efforts in enhancing water storage to support agricultural and industrial activities.
Countries with Limited Capacity
Conversely, several countries reported negligible or zero dam capacity per capita, indicating potential vulnerabilities in water security. Papua New Guinea, Belize, and Rwanda, among others, recorded no measurable dam capacity, highlighting the absence of significant water storage infrastructure. Such limitations could impact agricultural productivity and community water access, necessitating strategic investments in dam construction and water resource development to mitigate scarcity and enhance resilience against droughts or seasonal variations.
Year-Over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
Analyzing the changes from the previous year, 1976 saw varied trends in dam capacity per capita across different nations. Notably, New Zealand experienced a remarkable increase of 1,982.75 cubic meters (64.2%), illustrating significant advancements in water storage infrastructure. Similarly, Panama saw a 42.6% rise, showcasing its commitment to improving water management systems. However, some countries faced declines; Zambia, for instance, recorded a decrease of 576.30 cubic meters (-3.0%), and Ghana experienced a reduction of 408.10 cubic meters (-2.8%). These decreases could be attributed to changing climatic conditions, increased demand, or shifts in water management strategies.
Geographic Distribution and Regional Insights
The geographic distribution of dam capacity per capita in 1976 highlights distinct patterns, often influenced by natural water endowments and regional policy priorities. The African continent exhibited a mix of high and low capacities, reflecting both the availability of natural resources and the varied implementation of water management policies. North America, with Canada as a prime example, demonstrated a high per capita capacity, aligning with its extensive freshwater systems. In contrast, several Asian and Pacific nations, such as Nepal and Fiji, recorded minimal capacities, suggesting a need for enhanced water storage infrastructure to support growing populations and economic activities.
Overall, the 1976 global landscape of dam capacity per capita underscores the essential role of strategic water management in achieving sustainability and supporting societal needs. As nations continue to grapple with climate variability and increasing demands on water resources, understanding these distribution patterns can inform policy-making and foster international cooperation to ensure equitable water access and long-term resource security.
Insights by country
Turkey
In 1976, Turkey ranked 28th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1104.77 cubic meters per inhabitant. This significant figure reflects Turkey's emphasis on water resource management and infrastructure development during a period of rapid economic growth.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Turkey's geographical features, which include numerous rivers and mountainous terrains conducive to the construction of dams. Additionally, the government's investment in hydroelectric projects aimed to harness the country's water resources for energy production and irrigation, further enhancing the capacity statistics.
Turkey's extensive network of dams has played a crucial role in supporting its agricultural sector and providing electricity, particularly in rural areas. As of the mid-1970s, the country was actively expanding its dam infrastructure, which has continued to impact its economic and environmental policies in subsequent decades.
Oman
In 1976, Oman ranked 144th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population, highlighting challenges in water resource management during that period.
The low dam capacity per capita in Oman can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic and climatic conditions, which feature arid landscapes and limited freshwater sources. Additionally, the development of water infrastructure in Oman was still in its nascent stages in the mid-1970s, as the country was undergoing modernization and economic reforms following the Sultanate's rise in the late 20th century.
As a result, the lack of dam capacity not only affected the availability of water for agricultural purposes but also posed challenges for urban development and population growth. Over the subsequent decades, Oman has made significant investments in water infrastructure, resulting in improved water management practices and increased dam capacity, reflecting the country's commitment to addressing its water scarcity issues.
Syrian Arab Republic
The Syrian Arab Republic ranked 25th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1976, with a notable capacity of 1611.37 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure during this period, aimed at supporting its agricultural sector and urban development.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including Syria's geographical characteristics that allow for dam construction and the strategic importance of water resources in a predominantly arid region. The country has a history of utilizing its rivers, particularly the Euphrates, for irrigation and hydroelectric power generation, which has further enhanced its water storage capabilities.
In the broader context, this statistic illustrates Syria's early efforts to harness water resources effectively, which were crucial for sustaining its population and economy. However, the political and environmental challenges that have arisen in subsequent decades have significantly impacted these water resources and their management.
Congo
In 1976, Congo ranked 104th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 5.39819 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's ability to harness and store water resources, which is crucial for agriculture, energy production, and domestic use.
The relatively modest dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited infrastructure development and historical political instability, which hindered investments in large-scale water management projects. Additionally, the country's vast river systems, such as the Congo River, have not been fully utilized for hydroelectric power generation and irrigation.
Interestingly, despite the challenges, Congo has significant potential for hydropower development, as it possesses some of the largest hydroelectric plants in Africa. Enhancing dam capacity could play a vital role in addressing energy needs and improving economic conditions in the region.
Germany
In 1976, Germany ranked 93rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 37.6466 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's extensive network of dams and reservoirs, which are integral to its water management and flood control strategies.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Germany's geographical landscape and population density, which necessitate efficient water resource management. The country has historically invested in infrastructure development, particularly in the aftermath of World War II, which resulted in the construction of numerous dams to support industrial growth and agricultural irrigation.
Moreover, Germany's commitment to environmental sustainability and flood prevention has influenced its dam construction policies, focusing not only on capacity but also on ecological impacts. As a result, while the dam capacity per capita may appear modest, it plays a critical role in supporting both the economy and the environment.
Zambia
Zambia ranked third out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1976, with a remarkable capacity of 18,703.6 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high figure reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure, which are crucial for its energy needs and agricultural irrigation.
The extensive dam capacity can be attributed to Zambia's abundant water resources, primarily from the Zambezi River and its tributaries, which have been harnessed for both power generation and storage. Additionally, the emphasis on hydropower during this period was driven by the need for sustainable energy sources to support industrial growth and rural development.
Interestingly, Zambia's focus on exploiting its water resources for energy has positioned it as a leading player in the Southern African region's energy landscape. This historical context of high dam capacity per capita underscores the importance of water management in national development strategies during the mid-20th century.
Uruguay
In 1976, Uruguay ranked 21st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3,927.58 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's robust infrastructure for water management, which is vital for both agricultural and urban needs.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Uruguay's geographical features, which include numerous rivers and a favorable climate for hydropower generation. The country's investment in hydropower has enabled it to harness these natural resources effectively, contributing to its energy security and economic stability.
Additionally, Uruguay's focus on sustainable water management practices and the development of its hydroelectric facilities have played a crucial role in maintaining this capacity. It is noteworthy that this emphasis on renewable energy sources has positioned Uruguay as a leader in sustainable practices in the region, with hydropower accounting for a significant portion of its electricity generation.
Singapore
In 1976, Singapore ranked 96th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded capacity of 25.2527 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, crucial for a nation with limited natural freshwater resources.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Singapore's high population density and geographic constraints, which necessitate efficient water use and innovative solutions such as desalination and rainwater harvesting. The government has implemented comprehensive water management policies to address the challenges posed by its urban environment.
Interestingly, Singapore's efforts in water sustainability have positioned the country as a leader in water technology and innovation, demonstrating a shift from reliance on traditional dam infrastructure to more modern and sustainable practices in water management.
Serbia
In 1976, Serbia ranked 153rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant lack of large-scale water infrastructure development relative to its population at that time.
The limited dam capacity per capita could be attributed to a variety of factors, including historical economic challenges, political instability, and the prioritization of other infrastructural needs over water management and hydropower development during that period. Furthermore, the socio-political landscape of the former Yugoslavia, of which Serbia was a part, may have influenced investment decisions in water resources management.
Interestingly, Serbia's ranking reflects broader regional trends in Eastern Europe during the 1970s, where many countries faced similar challenges in developing adequate water resource infrastructure. This statistic highlights the ongoing importance of investing in water management systems for sustainable development and improved quality of life.
Cyprus
In 1976, Cyprus had a dam capacity per capita of 65.2627 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 85th out of 164 countries in terms of this statistic. This relatively moderate capacity reflects the island's geographical characteristics and the management of its water resources, which are essential for both agricultural and domestic use.
The dam capacity per capita can be influenced by various factors, including the availability of natural water sources, historical rainfall patterns, and the development of infrastructure for water storage. In Cyprus, the need for effective water management has been critical due to its Mediterranean climate, which features hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters.
Additionally, during the mid-1970s, Cyprus was undergoing significant socio-political changes, including the aftermath of the Turkish invasion in 1974, which may have impacted resource allocation and infrastructure development. Such circumstances often lead to a focus on maintaining and enhancing water supply systems to support both the local population and agricultural needs.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data