Dam capacity per capita 1979

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
4,462.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
3,657.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,521.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Albania flag
Albania
1,335.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
634.675 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Angola flag
Angola
550.725 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Austria flag
Austria
243.497 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
147.119 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Algeria flag
Algeria
114.863 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
78.119 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
75.371 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
28,162.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,072.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Chile flag
Chile
852.308 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
837.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
545.609 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Cuba flag
Cuba
363.025 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Botswana flag
Botswana
338.012 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
China flag
China
280.331 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
257.452 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
249.487 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
166.206 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
130.633 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
63.768 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
51.454 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.741 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Benin flag
Benin
6.154 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo flag
Congo
5.032 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2.042 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Egypt flag
Egypt
3,928.12 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
780.959 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
126.291 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
25.878 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ghana flag
Ghana
12,787.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
9,650.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iceland flag
Iceland
6,090.65 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Finland flag
Finland
3,904.55 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Laos flag
Laos
2,177.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,306.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Greece flag
Greece
1,011.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
633.959 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Iran flag
Iran
415.638 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Guyana flag
Guyana
259.914 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Ireland flag
Ireland
257.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
India flag
India
238.206 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
France flag
France
168.413 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Italy flag
Italy
141.412 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Japan flag
Japan
109.898 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Haiti flag
Haiti
53.926 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
53.421 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Guinea flag
Guinea
47.789 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Germany flag
Germany
37.751 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Hungary flag
Hungary
23.989 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Honduras flag
Honduras
6.968 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.909 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.122 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.115 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Liberia flag
Liberia
127.409 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
76.319 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Jordan flag
Jordan
3.064 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.571 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
106.403 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
10,102.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
6,572.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Norway flag
Norway
5,618.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
5,058.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Panama flag
Panama
4,464.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
2,867.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,316.03 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
North Korea flag
North Korea
992.376 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Namibia flag
Namibia
636.585 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Portugal flag
Portugal
603.458 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
579.717 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Morocco flag
Morocco
535.103 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
473.202 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
459.354 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Romania flag
Romania
372.622 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
348.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Peru flag
Peru
235.396 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
150.543 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
149.146 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
73.97 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
67.033 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
56.476 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Mali flag
Mali
23.728 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Malawi flag
Malawi
6.926 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Philippines flag
Philippines
83.663 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Poland flag
Poland
56.879 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Niger flag
Niger
5.435 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
22.122 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
50.371 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
52,965.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
17,957.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
14,828.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
6,152.82 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
5,432.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
4,798.18 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,262.73 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
3,088.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,459.04 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Spain flag
Spain
1,082.29 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,042.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Thailand flag
Thailand
885.832 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
682.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
531.16 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
503.912 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
288.339 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
86.224 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
68.589 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
24.328 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
665.414 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
South Korea flag
South Korea
186.566 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
123.612 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
22.453 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
2.63 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.568 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Albania flagAlbania
  5. #5Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  6. #6Angola flagAngola
  7. #7Austria flagAustria
  8. #8Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  9. #9Algeria flagAlgeria
  10. #10Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tunisia flagTunisia
  9. #156Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  10. #155Sudan flagSudan

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1979, the metric of dam capacity per capita served as a crucial indicator of water resource management across the globe. Measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, this statistic reflects the volume of water storage available to each person, highlighting the sustainability of water resources in different countries. As an essential component of environmental planning and economic development, dam capacity per capita reveals significant insights into how nations handle water security, support agricultural activities, and ensure industrial growth while maintaining ecological balance.

Global Overview of Dam Capacity Per Capita in 1979

During this year, data was available for 123 countries, showcasing a diverse range of water storage capabilities. The global average dam capacity per capita was 2072.39 cubic meters, with a median value significantly lower at 249.49. This disparity indicates vast differences in water management efficiency and infrastructure development across various regions. Suriname led the global ranking with an astonishing 52,965.8 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting substantial investments in dam infrastructure relative to its population. In contrast, several countries, including Belize, Bhutan, and Papua New Guinea, reported no dam capacity per capita, underscoring challenges in water resource development.

Notable Country Insights

Examining specific nations provides a deeper understanding of dam capacity dynamics in 1979. Canada, with 28,162.3 cubic meters per capita, showcased its robust water management system, vital for supporting its vast industrial and agricultural sectors. Meanwhile, Zambia and Zimbabwe, with figures of 17,957.8 and 14,828.2 respectively, indicated strong commitments to water resource development, critical for their agrarian-based economies. Conversely, countries like Yemen, with a dam capacity of only 0.567638 cubic meters per capita, faced significant challenges in water security, impacting their growth and stability.

Regional Variations and Their Implications

Regional analysis reveals stark contrasts in dam capacity per capita. African nations like Zambia and Mozambique featured prominently among the top-tier countries, highlighting a focus on building dams to secure water for agriculture and energy production. However, other African countries, such as Rwanda and Nepal, recorded zero capacity, indicating development disparities within the continent. In Latin America, Nicaragua boasted a substantial capacity of 10,102.8 cubic meters, suggesting effective water management policies that could be attributed to its geographical advantage and political focus on agriculture.

The year 1979 saw notable changes in dam capacity figures from the previous year. Albania experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 999.84 cubic meters per capita, marking a significant shift towards improved water storage infrastructure. Costa Rica also reported a remarkable increase of 820.98 cubic meters per capita, translating to a growth rate of 5038.2%, signalling aggressive infrastructure expansion. Conversely, countries like Zambia and Ghana experienced declines of 546.60 and 396.50 cubic meters respectively, which could reflect environmental challenges or resource mismanagement.

Sustainability and Development Implications

Understanding dam capacity per capita in 1979 offers valuable insights into sustainable development and resource management. Countries with higher capacities generally possess enhanced resilience against environmental fluctuations, supporting their agricultural and industrial sectors. This metric also serves as a benchmark for future infrastructure projects, guiding nations in their pursuit of water security and sustainable growth. For countries with minimal or zero capacity, the statistics underline the urgency for international assistance and policy changes to foster equitable resource distribution and address regional disparities.

Overall, the data from 1979 highlights the critical role of dam capacity per capita as a determinant of economic vitality and environmental sustainability. By examining these figures, policymakers and researchers can better appreciate the complexities of water resource management and its profound impact on global development.

Insights by country

1

Bhutan

In 1979, Bhutan ranked 122nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the limited infrastructure for water storage and management within the country during this period.

The absence of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Bhutan's geographical landscape, which is characterized by mountainous terrain, and its focus on preserving the environment and maintaining its cultural heritage over extensive industrialization. At the time, the country was relatively underdeveloped and had not yet invested significantly in hydroelectric projects, which later became a cornerstone of its economy.

Interestingly, Bhutan has since developed its hydropower resources, becoming a leader in renewable energy in the region, but in 1979, the lack of dam capacity per capita reflected the early stages of its economic development and infrastructure planning.

2

France

In 1979, France ranked 67th out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 168.413 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects France's extensive investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which has been a crucial component of its energy mix, supporting both domestic consumption and industrial needs.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to France's geographic characteristics, including numerous rivers and a varied topography that are conducive to hydroelectric power generation. Additionally, government policies during the mid-20th century encouraged the development of renewable energy sources, reinforcing the country's commitment to sustainable energy production.

Furthermore, France's focus on hydropower aligns with its broader environmental goals, as the country has historically sought to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and combat climate change. The emphasis on hydroelectric energy has helped make France one of the world's leaders in renewable energy production.

3

Greece

In 1979, Greece ranked 32nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1011.34 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which was crucial for both agricultural irrigation and urban water supply during a period of economic expansion.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Greece's diverse topography, which includes numerous rivers and mountainous regions conducive to dam construction. Additionally, the increased focus on hydroelectric power generation during this era contributed to the establishment of several large-scale dams, enhancing the overall water capacity available to the population.

Moreover, this period marked a time of modernization and infrastructure development in Greece, which included improvements in water management systems. It is also worth noting that Greece's strategic geographical location made it essential to develop robust water resources to support both its growing population and the agricultural sector, which was vital to the economy.

4

China

In 1979, China ranked 58th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 280.331 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects China's expansive hydrological infrastructure, which was developed to support its rapidly growing population and industrial sector during a period of economic reform.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to China's emphasis on large-scale infrastructure projects, which aimed to harness water resources for irrigation, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation. The construction of major dams, such as the Three Gorges Dam, began in later years but laid the groundwork for significant advancements in water management and energy production.

Additionally, by the late 1970s, China was undergoing transformative changes that included substantial investments in energy and agriculture, which increased the demand for reliable water supply systems. This investment in water infrastructure not only addressed immediate needs but also set the stage for future development, contributing to China becoming one of the world's largest producers of hydroelectric power.

5

Morocco

In 1979, Morocco ranked 47th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 535.103 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water infrastructure, which is crucial for its agricultural sector and overall economic development.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Morocco's geographic and climatic conditions, which necessitate effective water management systems to combat arid conditions and support irrigation. Significant projects, such as the construction of the Al Massira Dam, have contributed to this capacity, allowing for better water resource utilization in both urban and rural areas.

Moreover, the management of water resources in Morocco has been pivotal in supporting its agricultural economy, which employs a significant portion of the population. The focus on dam construction and water conservation has also been a response to challenges posed by climate variability, making this statistic a critical indicator of the country's resilience and adaptive strategies.

6

Libya

In 1979, Libya ranked 79th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 106.403 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, crucial for its largely arid climate and reliance on irrigation for agriculture.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Libya's extensive efforts to develop water resources, particularly through the Great Man-Made River project, which began in the 1980s and aimed to supply fresh water from underground aquifers. Such initiatives were essential for sustaining the population and supporting agricultural productivity in an environment characterized by low annual rainfall.

Additionally, Libya's wealth from oil revenues during this period enabled significant public investment in infrastructure, including water management systems, which contributed to the country’s capacity to store and supply water to its citizens effectively.

7

Senegal

In 1979, Senegal ranked 152nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population, which may have contributed to challenges in water resource management and agricultural productivity.

The low dam capacity per capita in Senegal during this period can be attributed to several factors, including limited investment in hydraulic infrastructure, economic constraints, and a focus on other pressing developmental needs. Additionally, the country faced environmental challenges such as seasonal variability in rainfall, which heightened the importance of effective water management systems.

During the late 1970s, Senegal was grappling with various socio-economic issues, including high rates of poverty and rural migration, which may have hindered the development of extensive water storage solutions. As a result, this lack of infrastructure could have had lasting impacts on food security and access to clean water for the population.

8

Papua New Guinea

In 1979, Papua New Guinea ranked 146th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the country's limited infrastructure in terms of water storage and management, which is critical for agricultural and domestic water supply.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographical challenges, with mountainous terrain and a lack of investment in large-scale water management projects. Additionally, Papua New Guinea's economy during this period was primarily reliant on subsistence agriculture and lacked the industrial development that often accompanies significant infrastructure investments.

Interestingly, as of 2021, the challenges surrounding water resource management continue to persist, with many regions still facing issues related to access to clean water and sustainable water infrastructure. The historical context of limited dam capacity has long-term implications for development, public health, and economic growth in the nation.

9

North Macedonia

In 1979, North Macedonia ranked 144th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an actual value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of infrastructure for water management and reservoir capacity relative to its population.

The limited dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic and climatic conditions, which may not have favored large-scale dam construction. Additionally, during this period, North Macedonia was part of the former Yugoslavia, where resource allocation and infrastructure development were often influenced by central planning decisions that may not have prioritized water management in this region.

Furthermore, the country's economic and political situation at the time, characterized by a lack of investment in public infrastructure, likely contributed to its low ranking in dam capacity. In contrast, many neighboring countries were investing in water management systems to support agricultural and industrial needs, which may have resulted in a disparity in dam capacity metrics.

10

Argentina

In 1979, Argentina ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3,521.14 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure, which has been critical for agricultural development and energy supply.

Several factors contributed to this high dam capacity per capita, including Argentina's vast natural resources, particularly in terms of water availability from its major rivers, such as the Paraná and Colorado. The focus on hydroelectric power generation during the mid-20th century led to the construction of large dams, which not only provided energy but also irrigation capabilities to support the country's agrarian economy.

Additionally, this statistic is indicative of the country's strategic emphasis on harnessing its water resources for economic growth, as well as its geographical advantages. By the late 20th century, Argentina had positioned itself as a leader in hydroelectric capacity in South America, leveraging its water resources to bolster both energy production and agricultural output.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts