Dam capacity per capita 1979
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Australia | 4,462.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3,657.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 3,521.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Albania | 1,335.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Bulgaria | 634.675 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Angola | 550.725 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Austria | 243.497 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Afghanistan | 147.119 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Algeria | 114.863 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Antigua and Barbuda | 78.119 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Bangladesh | 75.371 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Canada | 28,162.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Brazil | 4,072.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Chile | 852.308 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Costa Rica | 837.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Cameroon | 545.609 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Cuba | 363.025 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Botswana | 338.012 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | China | 280.331 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Colombia | 257.452 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Brunei Darussalam | 249.487 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Dominican Republic | 166.206 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Burkina Faso | 130.633 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Cyprus | 63.768 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Bolivia | 51.454 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 14.741 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Benin | 6.154 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo | 5.032 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.042 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Egypt | 3,928.12 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | El Salvador | 780.959 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Eswatini | 126.291 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Ecuador | 25.878 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Ghana | 12,787.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Iraq | 9,650.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Iceland | 6,090.65 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Finland | 3,904.55 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Laos | 2,177.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Kenya | 1,306.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Greece | 1,011.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Lesotho | 633.959 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Iran | 415.638 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Guyana | 259.914 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Ireland | 257.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | India | 238.206 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | France | 168.413 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Italy | 141.412 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Japan | 109.898 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Haiti | 53.926 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Indonesia | 53.421 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Guinea | 47.789 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Germany | 37.751 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Hungary | 23.989 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Honduras | 6.968 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Denmark | 3.909 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Guatemala | 0.122 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Fiji | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Gabon | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Grenada | 0.115 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Liberia | 127.409 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Lebanon | 76.319 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Jordan | 3.064 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Jamaica | 2.571 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 106.403 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 10,102.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Mozambique | 6,572.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Norway | 5,618.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | New Zealand | 5,058.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Panama | 4,464.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Paraguay | 2,867.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Mexico | 1,316.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | North Korea | 992.376 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Namibia | 636.585 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Portugal | 603.458 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Malaysia | 579.717 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Morocco | 535.103 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Nigeria | 473.202 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Netherlands | 459.354 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Romania | 372.622 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Pakistan | 348.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Peru | 235.396 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Mongolia | 150.543 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Luxembourg | 149.146 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Myanmar | 73.97 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Mauritius | 67.033 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Madagascar | 56.476 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Mali | 23.728 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Malawi | 6.926 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Philippines | 83.663 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Poland | 56.879 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Niger | 5.435 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Nepal | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Saint Lucia | 22.122 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 50.371 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 52,965.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 17,957.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 14,828.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uganda | 6,152.82 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Tanzania | 5,432.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Uruguay | 4,798.18 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sweden | 4,262.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 3,088.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,459.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Spain | 1,082.29 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Turkey | 1,042.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Thailand | 885.832 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Venezuela | 682.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Switzerland | 531.16 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Vietnam | 503.912 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Sri Lanka | 288.339 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 86.224 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 68.589 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 24.328 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 665.414 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | South Korea | 186.566 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tunisia | 123.612 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 22.453 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 2.63 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.568 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Australia
- #2
Côte d'Ivoire
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Albania
- #5
Bulgaria
- #6
Angola
- #7
Austria
- #8
Afghanistan
- #9
Algeria
- #10
Antigua and Barbuda
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tunisia
- #156
Tajikistan
- #155
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1979, the metric of dam capacity per capita served as a crucial indicator of water resource management across the globe. Measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, this statistic reflects the volume of water storage available to each person, highlighting the sustainability of water resources in different countries. As an essential component of environmental planning and economic development, dam capacity per capita reveals significant insights into how nations handle water security, support agricultural activities, and ensure industrial growth while maintaining ecological balance.
Global Overview of Dam Capacity Per Capita in 1979
During this year, data was available for 123 countries, showcasing a diverse range of water storage capabilities. The global average dam capacity per capita was 2072.39 cubic meters, with a median value significantly lower at 249.49. This disparity indicates vast differences in water management efficiency and infrastructure development across various regions. Suriname led the global ranking with an astonishing 52,965.8 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting substantial investments in dam infrastructure relative to its population. In contrast, several countries, including Belize, Bhutan, and Papua New Guinea, reported no dam capacity per capita, underscoring challenges in water resource development.
Notable Country Insights
Examining specific nations provides a deeper understanding of dam capacity dynamics in 1979. Canada, with 28,162.3 cubic meters per capita, showcased its robust water management system, vital for supporting its vast industrial and agricultural sectors. Meanwhile, Zambia and Zimbabwe, with figures of 17,957.8 and 14,828.2 respectively, indicated strong commitments to water resource development, critical for their agrarian-based economies. Conversely, countries like Yemen, with a dam capacity of only 0.567638 cubic meters per capita, faced significant challenges in water security, impacting their growth and stability.
Regional Variations and Their Implications
Regional analysis reveals stark contrasts in dam capacity per capita. African nations like Zambia and Mozambique featured prominently among the top-tier countries, highlighting a focus on building dams to secure water for agriculture and energy production. However, other African countries, such as Rwanda and Nepal, recorded zero capacity, indicating development disparities within the continent. In Latin America, Nicaragua boasted a substantial capacity of 10,102.8 cubic meters, suggesting effective water management policies that could be attributed to its geographical advantage and political focus on agriculture.
Year-Over-Year Trends and Historical Context
The year 1979 saw notable changes in dam capacity figures from the previous year. Albania experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 999.84 cubic meters per capita, marking a significant shift towards improved water storage infrastructure. Costa Rica also reported a remarkable increase of 820.98 cubic meters per capita, translating to a growth rate of 5038.2%, signalling aggressive infrastructure expansion. Conversely, countries like Zambia and Ghana experienced declines of 546.60 and 396.50 cubic meters respectively, which could reflect environmental challenges or resource mismanagement.
Sustainability and Development Implications
Understanding dam capacity per capita in 1979 offers valuable insights into sustainable development and resource management. Countries with higher capacities generally possess enhanced resilience against environmental fluctuations, supporting their agricultural and industrial sectors. This metric also serves as a benchmark for future infrastructure projects, guiding nations in their pursuit of water security and sustainable growth. For countries with minimal or zero capacity, the statistics underline the urgency for international assistance and policy changes to foster equitable resource distribution and address regional disparities.
Overall, the data from 1979 highlights the critical role of dam capacity per capita as a determinant of economic vitality and environmental sustainability. By examining these figures, policymakers and researchers can better appreciate the complexities of water resource management and its profound impact on global development.
Insights by country
Bhutan
In 1979, Bhutan ranked 122nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the limited infrastructure for water storage and management within the country during this period.
The absence of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Bhutan's geographical landscape, which is characterized by mountainous terrain, and its focus on preserving the environment and maintaining its cultural heritage over extensive industrialization. At the time, the country was relatively underdeveloped and had not yet invested significantly in hydroelectric projects, which later became a cornerstone of its economy.
Interestingly, Bhutan has since developed its hydropower resources, becoming a leader in renewable energy in the region, but in 1979, the lack of dam capacity per capita reflected the early stages of its economic development and infrastructure planning.
France
In 1979, France ranked 67th out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 168.413 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects France's extensive investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which has been a crucial component of its energy mix, supporting both domestic consumption and industrial needs.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to France's geographic characteristics, including numerous rivers and a varied topography that are conducive to hydroelectric power generation. Additionally, government policies during the mid-20th century encouraged the development of renewable energy sources, reinforcing the country's commitment to sustainable energy production.
Furthermore, France's focus on hydropower aligns with its broader environmental goals, as the country has historically sought to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and combat climate change. The emphasis on hydroelectric energy has helped make France one of the world's leaders in renewable energy production.
Greece
In 1979, Greece ranked 32nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1011.34 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which was crucial for both agricultural irrigation and urban water supply during a period of economic expansion.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Greece's diverse topography, which includes numerous rivers and mountainous regions conducive to dam construction. Additionally, the increased focus on hydroelectric power generation during this era contributed to the establishment of several large-scale dams, enhancing the overall water capacity available to the population.
Moreover, this period marked a time of modernization and infrastructure development in Greece, which included improvements in water management systems. It is also worth noting that Greece's strategic geographical location made it essential to develop robust water resources to support both its growing population and the agricultural sector, which was vital to the economy.
China
In 1979, China ranked 58th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 280.331 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects China's expansive hydrological infrastructure, which was developed to support its rapidly growing population and industrial sector during a period of economic reform.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to China's emphasis on large-scale infrastructure projects, which aimed to harness water resources for irrigation, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation. The construction of major dams, such as the Three Gorges Dam, began in later years but laid the groundwork for significant advancements in water management and energy production.
Additionally, by the late 1970s, China was undergoing transformative changes that included substantial investments in energy and agriculture, which increased the demand for reliable water supply systems. This investment in water infrastructure not only addressed immediate needs but also set the stage for future development, contributing to China becoming one of the world's largest producers of hydroelectric power.
Morocco
In 1979, Morocco ranked 47th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 535.103 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water infrastructure, which is crucial for its agricultural sector and overall economic development.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Morocco's geographic and climatic conditions, which necessitate effective water management systems to combat arid conditions and support irrigation. Significant projects, such as the construction of the Al Massira Dam, have contributed to this capacity, allowing for better water resource utilization in both urban and rural areas.
Moreover, the management of water resources in Morocco has been pivotal in supporting its agricultural economy, which employs a significant portion of the population. The focus on dam construction and water conservation has also been a response to challenges posed by climate variability, making this statistic a critical indicator of the country's resilience and adaptive strategies.
Libya
In 1979, Libya ranked 79th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 106.403 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, crucial for its largely arid climate and reliance on irrigation for agriculture.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Libya's extensive efforts to develop water resources, particularly through the Great Man-Made River project, which began in the 1980s and aimed to supply fresh water from underground aquifers. Such initiatives were essential for sustaining the population and supporting agricultural productivity in an environment characterized by low annual rainfall.
Additionally, Libya's wealth from oil revenues during this period enabled significant public investment in infrastructure, including water management systems, which contributed to the country’s capacity to store and supply water to its citizens effectively.
Senegal
In 1979, Senegal ranked 152nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population, which may have contributed to challenges in water resource management and agricultural productivity.
The low dam capacity per capita in Senegal during this period can be attributed to several factors, including limited investment in hydraulic infrastructure, economic constraints, and a focus on other pressing developmental needs. Additionally, the country faced environmental challenges such as seasonal variability in rainfall, which heightened the importance of effective water management systems.
During the late 1970s, Senegal was grappling with various socio-economic issues, including high rates of poverty and rural migration, which may have hindered the development of extensive water storage solutions. As a result, this lack of infrastructure could have had lasting impacts on food security and access to clean water for the population.
Papua New Guinea
In 1979, Papua New Guinea ranked 146th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the country's limited infrastructure in terms of water storage and management, which is critical for agricultural and domestic water supply.
The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographical challenges, with mountainous terrain and a lack of investment in large-scale water management projects. Additionally, Papua New Guinea's economy during this period was primarily reliant on subsistence agriculture and lacked the industrial development that often accompanies significant infrastructure investments.
Interestingly, as of 2021, the challenges surrounding water resource management continue to persist, with many regions still facing issues related to access to clean water and sustainable water infrastructure. The historical context of limited dam capacity has long-term implications for development, public health, and economic growth in the nation.
North Macedonia
In 1979, North Macedonia ranked 144th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an actual value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of infrastructure for water management and reservoir capacity relative to its population.
The limited dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic and climatic conditions, which may not have favored large-scale dam construction. Additionally, during this period, North Macedonia was part of the former Yugoslavia, where resource allocation and infrastructure development were often influenced by central planning decisions that may not have prioritized water management in this region.
Furthermore, the country's economic and political situation at the time, characterized by a lack of investment in public infrastructure, likely contributed to its low ranking in dam capacity. In contrast, many neighboring countries were investing in water management systems to support agricultural and industrial needs, which may have resulted in a disparity in dam capacity metrics.
Argentina
In 1979, Argentina ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3,521.14 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure, which has been critical for agricultural development and energy supply.
Several factors contributed to this high dam capacity per capita, including Argentina's vast natural resources, particularly in terms of water availability from its major rivers, such as the Paraná and Colorado. The focus on hydroelectric power generation during the mid-20th century led to the construction of large dams, which not only provided energy but also irrigation capabilities to support the country's agrarian economy.
Additionally, this statistic is indicative of the country's strategic emphasis on harnessing its water resources for economic growth, as well as its geographical advantages. By the late 20th century, Argentina had positioned itself as a leader in hydroelectric capacity in South America, leveraging its water resources to bolster both energy production and agricultural output.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data