Dam capacity per capita 1973

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
4,636.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Australia flag
Australia
3,346.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
1,824.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
449.123 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Albania flag
Albania
375.41 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Austria flag
Austria
198.679 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
165.241 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Algeria flag
Algeria
122.248 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
78.036 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Angola flag
Angola
29.052 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
87.857 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
25,381.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,361.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Chile flag
Chile
858.701 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Botswana flag
Botswana
467.192 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
373.26 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
305.444 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
China flag
China
276.665 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Cuba flag
Cuba
240.518 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
215.908 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
64.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
57.192 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
38.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
18.558 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Belgium flag
Belgium
6.514 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Congo flag
Congo
5.542 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2.422 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Egypt flag
Egypt
4,533.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
41
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
334.936 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
139.811 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
30.601 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ghana flag
Ghana
15,243.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Iraq flag
Iraq
11,773 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iceland flag
Iceland
5,556.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Finland flag
Finland
3,958.71 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,585.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
764.631 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Greece flag
Greece
743.248 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Iran flag
Iran
403.013 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Ireland flag
Ireland
281.737 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Guyana flag
Guyana
249.282 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
India flag
India
209.501 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Liberia flag
Liberia
150.671 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
France flag
France
149.127 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Italy flag
Italy
142.529 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Japan flag
Japan
99.809 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
85.506 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
60.54 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Haiti flag
Haiti
60.529 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Guinea flag
Guinea
52.593 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Germany flag
Germany
34.356 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Honduras flag
Honduras
4.38 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.983 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Jordan flag
Jordan
3.712 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.779 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Hungary flag
Hungary
2.671 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
0.092 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.111 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Laos flag
Laos
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
89.206 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
12,067.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Norway flag
Norway
4,870.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Panama flag
Panama
3,549.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
2,330.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
2,035.52 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,294.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,079.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
669.426 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Namibia flag
Namibia
640.514 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Portugal flag
Portugal
625.042 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
479.718 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Morocco flag
Morocco
337.346 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
318.702 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Romania flag
Romania
254.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
219.843 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Peru flag
Peru
212.646 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
177.872 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
150.962 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
80.519 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
72.786 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
67.708 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Mali flag
Mali
26.527 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Malawi flag
Malawi
8.344 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
24.187 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Niger flag
Niger
4.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Poland flag
Poland
56.463 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Philippines flag
Philippines
39.708 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
12.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
50,534.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
20,458.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
17,068.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
7,178.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
6,720.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
4,002.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sweden flag
Sweden
3,984.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
3,083.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,752.18 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Spain flag
Spain
1,076.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,014.08 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
573.304 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
571.368 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
494.102 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Turkey flag
Turkey
381.139 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
321.866 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
81.863 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
76.737 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
12.545 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
550.131 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
South Korea flag
South Korea
158.41 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
122.911 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
24.196 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
3.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.682 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  2. #2Australia flagAustralia
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  5. #5Albania flagAlbania
  6. #6Austria flagAustria
  7. #7Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  8. #8Algeria flagAlgeria
  9. #9Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda
  10. #10Angola flagAngola

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tunisia flagTunisia
  9. #156Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  10. #155Sudan flagSudan

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1973, the global landscape of water resource management was underscored by the metric of dam capacity per capita, a key indicator of how countries were equipped to handle water storage challenges. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, provides crucial insights into a nation's capacity to support agriculture, manage water security, and facilitate industrial and community needs. As nations around the world grappled with balancing environmental concerns and development goals, analyzing the dam capacity per capita became increasingly important for understanding the sustainability and resilience of water infrastructure.

Top Performers in Dam Capacity

In 1973, Suriname emerged as the leader in dam capacity per capita, boasting a staggering 50,534.1 cubic meters per inhabitant. This impressive figure was followed by Canada, with a capacity of 25,381.6 cubic meters. These high capacities reflected the abundant natural resources and strategic investments in water infrastructure in these countries. Suriname's leadership can be attributed to its low population density and significant investments in hydropower, which play a pivotal role in its economic development. Similarly, Canada's vast and varied landscape, coupled with its focus on harnessing hydropower, positioned it as a top performer in this metric.

Challenges Faced by Low-Capacity Nations

Contrasting sharply with the leaders, several countries, including Cambodia, Rwanda, and Fiji, reported zero dam capacity per capita. These countries faced significant challenges in water resource management, often due to economic constraints, geographical limitations, or political factors. The lack of infrastructure in these regions highlighted the urgent need for international cooperation and investment in water resource development to ensure sustainable growth and improve living conditions. The absence of substantial dam capacity posed environmental and socio-economic risks, particularly in terms of agricultural productivity and access to clean water.

Analyzing the year-over-year changes, the global average dam capacity per capita increased by 4.14 cubic meters, demonstrating a 39.3% growth. The Syrian Arab Republic experienced the most substantial increase, rising by 1,701.21 cubic meters, marking a 3,337.6% surge. This remarkable growth was likely fueled by significant investments in dam construction to support agricultural expansion and population growth. Conversely, Zambia and Zimbabwe both saw decreases of approximately 2.8% in their capacities, reflecting challenges in maintaining existing infrastructure amidst growing demand and potentially adverse climatic conditions.

Regional Dynamics and Implications

The 1973 data reveals intriguing regional dynamics. African nations like Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Ghana, despite having relatively high capacities, faced decreases in their dam capacity per capita. This trend suggests a pressing need for enhanced infrastructure maintenance and strategic planning to counteract the pressures of population growth and climate variability. Meanwhile, countries in the Americas, such as Nicaragua and Argentina, demonstrated notable efforts to expand their water storage capabilities, aligning with broader development objectives and economic strategies. These regional dynamics underscore the diversity of challenges and opportunities in water resource management across the globe.

Environmental and Policy Impacts

In 1973, the interplay between environmental factors and policy decisions was evident in the distribution of dam capacity per capita. Countries with proactive water management policies and investments in infrastructure saw more sustainable outcomes. For instance, nations like Suriname and Canada benefitted from favorable natural conditions and government support, leading to their high capacities. In contrast, regions with limited policy frameworks or resources faced constraints in enhancing their water storage capabilities. These differences highlight the critical role of governmental actions and international cooperation in addressing water security challenges and supporting sustainable development goals.

Understanding the metric of dam capacity per capita in 1973 provides invaluable insights into the global state of water resource management. As nations continue to face environmental challenges and developmental pressures, this statistic remains a vital tool for assessing the efficacy of water storage strategies and their impacts on communities worldwide. The data from 1973 serves as a historical benchmark, guiding future efforts to build resilient and sustainable water infrastructure capable of meeting the demands of a growing global population.

Insights by country

1

Mali

Mali ranked 93rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1973, with a capacity of 26.5268 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population at the time, indicating challenges in water resource management and accessibility.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Mali can be attributed to several factors, including a lack of investment in large-scale water management projects, geographic and climatic conditions that affect water availability, and socio-economic challenges that hinder infrastructure development. The reliance on seasonal rainfall for agriculture and domestic use further complicates the water supply situation in the country.

As a landlocked country in West Africa, Mali's water resources are critical for its agricultural sector, which employs a significant portion of the population. Enhanced dam capacity and water management strategies are essential for improving agricultural productivity and ensuring water security in the face of climate variability.

2

Congo

In 1973, Congo ranked 101st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 5.54223 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s water resource management and infrastructure capabilities during a time when many African nations were grappling with post-colonial development challenges.

The relatively modest dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited investment in infrastructure, political instability, and the economic challenges that were prevalent during this era. Additionally, the size and geographical diversity of Congo may have posed logistical challenges in developing extensive water management systems.

Interestingly, while Congo's dam capacity per capita was low compared to some other nations, it was part of a broader trend in Africa where many countries were beginning to recognize the importance of hydropower and water conservation as critical to their development agendas.

3

France

In 1973, France ranked 67th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 149.127 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure, which has been a significant focus since the mid-20th century.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to France's geographical diversity, which includes numerous rivers and large bodies of water suitable for dam construction. Additionally, the French government has historically prioritized the development of renewable energy sources, particularly hydroelectricity, as part of its energy strategy.

Interestingly, France's commitment to hydroelectric power has helped it maintain a low carbon footprint in electricity generation. As of 1973, hydropower constituted a significant portion of the country's total electricity production, showcasing the importance of sustainable energy practices even in that era.

4

China

In 1973, China ranked 53rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 276.665 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects China's significant investment in hydropower infrastructure during a period marked by rapid industrialization and urbanization.

The substantial dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the country's extensive river systems, such as the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers, which have been harnessed for both energy generation and irrigation. The focus on developing large-scale dams was also driven by the need for flood control and water management in a country with a vast and diverse geography.

As a point of comparison, this capacity indicates a strategic approach to water resource management, which was essential for supporting the growing population and agricultural demands of the era. By enhancing dam infrastructure, China aimed to boost economic development and improve living standards, laying the groundwork for future advancements in water resource technology.

5

Colombia

In 1973, Colombia ranked 58th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive 215.908 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's considerable investments in water infrastructure, which are crucial for both agricultural and hydroelectric power generation.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Colombia's diverse geography, including numerous rivers and mountainous regions, which provide ample opportunities for dam construction. Additionally, the energy needs of the growing population during this period pushed the government to develop hydroelectric resources, making use of the country's abundant freshwater resources.

Moreover, Colombia's focus on energy independence through hydroelectric power has significantly shaped its energy policies, leading to the establishment of major dam projects that continue to influence the country's energy landscape today. As a notable fact, Colombia has one of the highest shares of hydropower in its total electricity generation, which has historically contributed to its energy security.

6

Argentina

In 1973, Argentina ranked 23rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 1824.88 cubic meters per inhabitant. This significant figure reflects the country's extensive investment in water resource management and infrastructure development during this period, which was essential for supporting both agricultural and industrial activities.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Argentina's vast natural resources, including numerous rivers and a favorable geographical landscape conducive to the construction of large dams. The government’s focus on hydroelectric power generation and irrigation systems played a crucial role in enhancing water storage capabilities, which in turn promoted agricultural productivity and energy supply.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that during the early 1970s, Argentina was experiencing a phase of economic growth, which allowed for increased public spending on infrastructure projects, including water management systems. This investment not only facilitated domestic needs but also positioned Argentina as a key player in regional agriculture and energy supply.

7

Nicaragua

Nicaragua ranked 6th in the world for dam capacity per capita in 1973, boasting an impressive 12,067.6 cubic meters of water storage capacity per inhabitant. This high ranking reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which has been essential for supporting its energy needs and agricultural irrigation.

The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Nicaragua's geographical features, including numerous rivers and lakes conducive to hydroelectric development. Furthermore, during this period, the government prioritized infrastructure projects aimed at harnessing water resources for both energy production and flood control.

Interestingly, Nicaragua's focus on hydroelectric power has continued to influence its energy landscape, with a large portion of the country's electricity being generated from renewable sources. This early commitment to dam construction laid the groundwork for sustainable energy practices that are increasingly relevant in today's context of climate change and energy demands.

8

Iran

In 1973, Iran ranked 43rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 403.013 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the significant investment in water infrastructure during a period of rapid modernization and industrialization in the country.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Iran's diverse topography and the need for effective water management in a predominantly arid climate. The government at the time prioritized the construction of dams to support agriculture, hydroelectric power generation, and urban water supply, addressing the challenges posed by seasonal droughts and water scarcity.

Additionally, this period was characterized by increased oil revenues, which allowed for substantial public investment in infrastructure projects, including dams. Overall, the capacity of dams in relation to the population not only highlights the country's focus on water resource management but also serves as a critical factor in supporting its agricultural economy and energy needs.

9

Bosnia and Herzegovina

In 1973, Bosnia and Herzegovina ranked 121st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a lack of significant infrastructure development related to water management and hydroelectric power during this period.

The absence of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various historical and economic factors, including the country's ongoing struggles with political stability and economic development in the decades leading up to and following the 1970s. Furthermore, the region's complex geography and hydrology may have influenced the feasibility and prioritization of dam construction.

It is also relevant to note that Bosnia and Herzegovina's water resources have historically been significant, with numerous rivers flowing through the country. However, the effective harnessing of these resources for hydroelectric power and irrigation was limited in the 1970s, impacting the overall dam capacity available to the population.

10

Grenada

In 1973, Grenada ranked 112th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 0.111439 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the limited water storage infrastructure relative to the size of its population, indicating potential challenges in managing water resources effectively.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Grenada's geographic characteristics, which feature a hilly terrain that may complicate the construction of large reservoirs. Additionally, being a small island nation, Grenada has a limited land area for the development of extensive water management systems, which can impact overall water supply security.

Notably, the ability to store water through dams is crucial for agricultural activities and domestic use, especially in a Caribbean context where rainfall can be variable. As a result, countries with higher dam capacities often have greater resilience to drought and other climate-related challenges, highlighting the importance of investment in water infrastructure for Grenada's sustainable development.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts