Dam capacity per capita 1971

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
3,312.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
410.475 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
287.779 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Austria flag
Austria
193.343 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
173.674 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
170.023 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Algeria flag
Algeria
128.077 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
77.57 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Angola flag
Angola
30.979 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
92.164 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Canada flag
Canada
24,873.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,362.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Chile flag
Chile
884.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
394.235 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Botswana flag
Botswana
366.04 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
326.368 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
China flag
China
241.426 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
176.451 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Colombia flag
Colombia
170.502 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Cuba flag
Cuba
83.941 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
59.822 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
44.883 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
40.383 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
19.539 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Belgium flag
Belgium
6.545 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Congo flag
Congo
5.899 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.588 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Egypt flag
Egypt
4,746.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
41
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
351.029 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
147.788 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
32.445 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ghana flag
Ghana
16,138.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Iraq flag
Iraq
12,611.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Finland flag
Finland
4,004.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,699.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
819.975 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Greece flag
Greece
752.244 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Iran flag
Iran
394.247 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Ireland flag
Ireland
290.332 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Guyana flag
Guyana
255.395 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
India flag
India
199.727 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Liberia flag
Liberia
158.635 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
France flag
France
151.011 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Italy flag
Italy
144.139 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Japan flag
Japan
96.856 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
89.931 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Haiti flag
Haiti
62.881 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Guinea flag
Guinea
54.418 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
47.562 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Germany flag
Germany
33.089 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Honduras flag
Honduras
4.653 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Denmark flag
Denmark
4.03 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Jordan flag
Jordan
4.012 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.863 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Hungary flag
Hungary
1.305 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.148 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
0.097 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.061 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Iceland flag
Iceland
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Laos flag
Laos
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
6.241 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
12,789.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Norway flag
Norway
4,609.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Panama flag
Panama
3,749.61 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
2,417.75 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
2,155.38 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,369.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,102.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Namibia flag
Namibia
680.183 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Portugal flag
Portugal
567.953 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
445.476 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
334.248 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
232.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Peru flag
Peru
222.935 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Morocco flag
Morocco
217.592 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
187.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
151.663 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
121.897 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Romania flag
Romania
113.628 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
84.049 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
74.866 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
71.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Mali flag
Mali
27.438 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Malawi flag
Malawi
8.788 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
24.865 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Niger flag
Niger
3.323 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Poland flag
Poland
57.431 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Philippines flag
Philippines
41.538 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
13.695 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
51,029.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
21,656.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
18,075.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
7,534.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
7,219.86 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
4,046.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sweden flag
Sweden
3,236.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
2,992.26 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Spain flag
Spain
1,066.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,047.07 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
597.428 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
520.127 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
501.567 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Turkey flag
Turkey
347.294 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
334.918 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
129.349 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
80.865 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
79.617 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
12.967 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
458.556 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
South Korea flag
South Korea
77.253 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
52.201 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
24.806 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
3.222 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.721 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Austria flagAustria
  5. #5Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Algeria flagAlgeria
  8. #8Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda
  9. #9Angola flagAngola
  10. #10Armenia flagArmenia

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  9. #156Syrian Arab Republic flagSyrian Arab Republic
  10. #155Sudan flagSudan

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1971, the metric of "Dam capacity per capita" offered a unique lens through which to view global water resource management. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, highlights the capacity of countries to store water, which is crucial for sustaining agriculture, industry, and communities. Effective water management directly impacts sustainability and development, making this statistic a vital indicator of a country's ability to secure water resources for its population.

Global Statistical Insights

The year 1971 saw a diverse range of dam capacities per capita across 120 countries. Suriname led the world with an impressive 51,029.3 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting a significant investment in water infrastructure relative to its population. This was followed by Canada with 24,873.7 cubic meters, showcasing its vast water resources and extensive system of reservoirs. Contrastingly, several countries, including Papua New Guinea, Nepal, and Cambodia, reported zero dam capacity per capita, highlighting a disparity in water storage infrastructure that could impact their economic and social development.

Regional Disparities and Their Implications

The data from 1971 underscores stark regional disparities in dam capacity per capita. African countries such as Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Ghana ranked among the top 10 globally, benefiting from significant hydrological projects and river systems. In contrast, many Asian and Pacific nations, including Bhutan and Fiji, reported no capacity, emphasizing a lack of infrastructure development that could hinder growth and resilience against climate variability. Such disparities suggest that geographic and climatic conditions, alongside economic priorities, significantly influence water management strategies.

Sustainability and Development Correlations

Sustainability in water resource management was a crucial theme in 1971. Countries with higher dam capacities, such as Iraq and Egypt, were better positioned to support agricultural activities and manage water security, pivotal for economic stability and growth. These countries could buffer against droughts and fluctuations in water supply, demonstrating the importance of strategic investments in water infrastructure. Conversely, nations with minimal or no dam capacity faced challenges in meeting the water needs of their populations, potentially limiting agricultural output and industrial development.

Year-over-Year Changes and Trends

The 1971 data also reveals interesting trends and changes from previous years. Australia, for instance, saw a significant increase in its dam capacity per capita, rising by 1,202.39 cubic meters (57.0%). This growth indicates a focused effort to enhance water storage capabilities, likely driven by increased agricultural demands and urban expansion. Similarly, Canada experienced a notable rise of 1,023.80 cubic meters (4.3%), reflecting ongoing development of its extensive water resources. Conversely, Suriname, despite leading globally, saw a decrease of 1,679.70 cubic meters (-3.2%), suggesting potential changes in water management policies or population growth affecting per capita calculations.

Policy and Governance Influences

Policy decisions and governance frameworks played a crucial role in shaping dam capacity per capita in 1971. Countries with robust governance structures and investment in water infrastructure, such as Canada and Australia, were able to increase their storage capacities significantly. Meanwhile, nations with less effective water policies or limited financial resources, such as those reporting zero capacity, faced challenges in infrastructure development. International cooperation and support could be vital in addressing these disparities, promoting equitable access to water resources and fostering sustainable development.

Overall, the metric of dam capacity per capita in 1971 provides essential insights into global water management practices and their implications for economic and social development. The data highlights the necessity for strategic investments in water infrastructure and governance to ensure water security and support growth across diverse regions. As the world continues to grapple with climate change and population growth, understanding and improving dam capacity per capita remains a critical objective for sustainable development worldwide.

Insights by country

1

Mauritania

Mauritania ranked 140th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1971, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant lack of developed water storage infrastructure relative to its population at that time.

The absence of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's vast desert landscape, limited water resources, and economic challenges that hindered investment in large-scale water management projects. Additionally, Mauritania's reliance on rainfall and surface water sources exacerbated the challenges of water supply and management.

Interestingly, Mauritania is characterized by a predominantly arid climate, which necessitates effective water management solutions to support agriculture and drinking water supply. The lack of dam infrastructure in 1971 reflects the broader issues of development and resource management that the country has faced historically.

2

Senegal

In 1971, Senegal ranked 152nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This low capacity indicates a significant lack of large-scale water storage infrastructure relative to the population, impacting the country's ability to manage water resources effectively.

The limited dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including underinvestment in water infrastructure, economic constraints, and the challenges of developing projects in a region that often faces droughts and variable rainfall. Historically, Senegal's reliance on agriculture, which is highly dependent on seasonal rains, has exacerbated the need for improved water management systems.

Additionally, during this period, Senegal was in the early stages of development, with a focus on addressing basic needs such as education and healthcare, often at the expense of infrastructure projects like dams. As a result, the country faced challenges in water supply and agricultural productivity, which are crucial for sustaining its growing population.

3

Morocco

In 1971, Morocco ranked 51st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 217.592 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts in water resource management, particularly in an arid region where water scarcity can pose significant challenges.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Morocco's investment in infrastructure to support agriculture and irrigation, as well as the government's initiatives to harness water resources for economic development. The construction of dams has played a crucial role in mitigating the effects of droughts and ensuring a stable water supply for both urban and rural populations.

Interestingly, Morocco has made significant strides in water conservation and management over the decades, and the strategic planning in this sector has contributed to its resilience against climatic variations. This capacity not only supports agricultural activities but also aids in the generation of hydroelectric power, which is essential for the country's energy needs.

4

Togo

Togo ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1971. The country exhibited a dam capacity of 3.22221 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a modest level of water storage infrastructure relative to its population size.

This statistic reflects Togo's developing status during the early 1970s, where investments in infrastructure, including water management systems, were still in nascent stages. Factors contributing to this level of dam capacity may include limited financial resources, ongoing political challenges, and a focus on agricultural development, which often prioritized immediate food security over long-term water resource management.

Moreover, Togo's water management strategies have historically been influenced by its geographical features, with a reliance on seasonal rainfall and rivers for irrigation and domestic use. This reliance underscores the importance of effective water resource management, especially in a country where agriculture plays a crucial role in the economy and sustenance of the population.

5

Malaysia

In 1971, Malaysia ranked 66th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 121.897 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s growing emphasis on developing its water resource infrastructure during a period of rapid economic development and urbanization.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Malaysia's geographical features and abundant rainfall, which facilitate the construction of large reservoirs. Moreover, the government's focus on agricultural expansion and the need for irrigation systems in rural areas further propelled investments in dam infrastructure, ensuring a stable water supply for both agricultural and domestic use.

In addition to its dam capacity, it is significant to note that Malaysia has continued to develop its water management infrastructure in subsequent decades, leading to improvements in water accessibility and quality for its population. This historical context underscores the importance of dam infrastructure in supporting economic growth and sustainability in Malaysia.

6

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone ranked 74th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1971. The country had a dam capacity of 79.6172 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its potential for water resource management and agricultural irrigation at that time.

This statistic indicates a relatively moderate level of infrastructure investment in water management, which is critical for a country that relies heavily on agriculture, which constituted a significant portion of its economy. The existence of dams can support irrigation and mitigate flooding, thus influencing agricultural productivity.

Factors contributing to this level of dam capacity may include the country’s geographic features, previous investments in infrastructure, and the focus on developing agricultural resources to support its population. Additionally, in the years leading up to 1971, Sierra Leone experienced various economic activities that necessitated the development of water resources.

7

Armenia

In 1971, Armenia ranked 113th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic suggests a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population at the time, which may have implications for agricultural productivity and water supply management.

The absence of measurable dam capacity per capita could be attributed to several factors, including the country's historical reliance on natural water sources and the limited development of large-scale water infrastructure during the Soviet era. Additionally, the geopolitical situation and economic constraints faced by Armenia may have hindered investment in infrastructure projects, impacting water resource management.

It is also noteworthy that Armenia, being a landlocked country, relies heavily on rivers and lakes for its water supply. The development of dams and reservoirs is crucial for ensuring a stable water supply, particularly in a region susceptible to variations in climate and seasonal water availability.

8

Congo

In 1971, Congo ranked 100 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 5.89852 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s ability to harness water resources for various uses, including agriculture, energy production, and flood management.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited infrastructure investment, ongoing political instability, and economic challenges that have historically affected development. Despite its vast natural resources, the country has struggled to fully develop its hydroelectric potential.

Interestingly, Congo is home to some of the largest rivers in Africa, such as the Congo River, which has significant hydroelectric potential. However, the underutilization of these resources illustrates the gap between potential and actual dam capacity, which remains a critical issue for economic growth and sustainability in the region.

9

Angola

In 1971, Angola ranked 90th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 30.9793 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to harness water resources for various uses, including agriculture, domestic consumption, and hydropower generation.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Angola's historical context of colonial rule, civil conflict, and underdeveloped infrastructure, which limited the construction and maintenance of water management systems. The country's economic focus during this period was not heavily oriented towards water resource development, which may have contributed to its ranking.

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that Angola's water resources are significant, yet the challenges in utilizing them effectively have meant that many inhabitants do not benefit from adequate water management solutions. This scenario is common in many countries with developing economies, where investments in infrastructure are crucial for improving access to essential resources.

10

Ethiopia

In 1971, Ethiopia ranked 127th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population, reflecting the country's challenges in managing water resources effectively during that period.

The absence of recorded dam capacity highlights Ethiopia's struggles with water management, which were influenced by factors such as limited financial resources, political instability, and inadequate infrastructure development. These issues were exacerbated by the country's geographical diversity, including highland areas and lowland regions, which complicated water resource distribution.

Additionally, Ethiopia's dam capacity has seen considerable changes in subsequent decades, particularly with the rise of major projects like the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which has the potential to significantly alter the country's water management landscape and improve its ranking in dam capacity per capita in the future.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts