Dam capacity per capita 1971
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Australia | 3,312.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Bulgaria | 410.475 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 287.779 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Austria | 193.343 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Afghanistan | 173.674 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 170.023 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Algeria | 128.077 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Antigua and Barbuda | 77.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Angola | 30.979 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bangladesh | 92.164 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Canada | 24,873.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Brazil | 4,362.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Chile | 884.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Cameroon | 394.235 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Botswana | 366.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Brunei Darussalam | 326.368 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | China | 241.426 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Côte d'Ivoire | 176.451 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Colombia | 170.502 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Cuba | 83.941 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Bolivia | 59.822 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Cyprus | 44.883 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Burkina Faso | 40.383 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Costa Rica | 19.539 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Belgium | 6.545 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Congo | 5.899 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.588 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Benin | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Egypt | 4,746.85 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | El Salvador | 351.029 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Eswatini | 147.788 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Ecuador | 32.445 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Ghana | 16,138.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Iraq | 12,611.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Finland | 4,004.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Kenya | 1,699.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Lesotho | 819.975 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Greece | 752.244 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Iran | 394.247 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Ireland | 290.332 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Guyana | 255.395 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | India | 199.727 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Liberia | 158.635 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | France | 151.011 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Italy | 144.139 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Japan | 96.856 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Lebanon | 89.931 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Haiti | 62.881 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Guinea | 54.418 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Indonesia | 47.562 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Germany | 33.089 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Honduras | 4.653 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Denmark | 4.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Jordan | 4.012 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Jamaica | 2.863 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Hungary | 1.305 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Guatemala | 0.148 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Dominican Republic | 0.097 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Fiji | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Gabon | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Grenada | 0.061 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Iceland | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Laos | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 6.241 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 12,789.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Norway | 4,609.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Panama | 3,749.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | New Zealand | 2,417.75 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Mozambique | 2,155.38 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Mexico | 1,369.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | North Korea | 1,102.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Namibia | 680.183 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Portugal | 567.953 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Netherlands | 445.476 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Nigeria | 334.248 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Pakistan | 232.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Peru | 222.935 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Morocco | 217.592 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Mongolia | 187.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Luxembourg | 151.663 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Malaysia | 121.897 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Romania | 113.628 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Myanmar | 84.049 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Mauritius | 74.866 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Madagascar | 71.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Mali | 27.438 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Malawi | 8.788 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Saint Lucia | 24.865 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Niger | 3.323 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Nepal | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Poland | 57.431 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Philippines | 41.538 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Paraguay | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 13.695 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 51,029.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 21,656.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 18,075.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uganda | 7,534.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Tanzania | 7,219.86 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Uruguay | 4,046.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sweden | 3,236.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 2,992.26 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Spain | 1,066.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Thailand | 1,047.07 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Vietnam | 597.428 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Venezuela | 520.127 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Switzerland | 501.567 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Turkey | 347.294 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Sri Lanka | 334.918 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Tunisia | 129.349 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 80.865 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 79.617 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 12.967 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 458.556 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | South Korea | 77.253 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Syrian Arab Republic | 52.201 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.806 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 3.222 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.721 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Australia
- #2
Bulgaria
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Austria
- #5
Afghanistan
- #6
Albania
- #7
Algeria
- #8
Antigua and Barbuda
- #9
Angola
- #10
Armenia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tajikistan
- #156
Syrian Arab Republic
- #155
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1971, the metric of "Dam capacity per capita" offered a unique lens through which to view global water resource management. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, highlights the capacity of countries to store water, which is crucial for sustaining agriculture, industry, and communities. Effective water management directly impacts sustainability and development, making this statistic a vital indicator of a country's ability to secure water resources for its population.
Global Statistical Insights
The year 1971 saw a diverse range of dam capacities per capita across 120 countries. Suriname led the world with an impressive 51,029.3 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting a significant investment in water infrastructure relative to its population. This was followed by Canada with 24,873.7 cubic meters, showcasing its vast water resources and extensive system of reservoirs. Contrastingly, several countries, including Papua New Guinea, Nepal, and Cambodia, reported zero dam capacity per capita, highlighting a disparity in water storage infrastructure that could impact their economic and social development.
Regional Disparities and Their Implications
The data from 1971 underscores stark regional disparities in dam capacity per capita. African countries such as Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Ghana ranked among the top 10 globally, benefiting from significant hydrological projects and river systems. In contrast, many Asian and Pacific nations, including Bhutan and Fiji, reported no capacity, emphasizing a lack of infrastructure development that could hinder growth and resilience against climate variability. Such disparities suggest that geographic and climatic conditions, alongside economic priorities, significantly influence water management strategies.
Sustainability and Development Correlations
Sustainability in water resource management was a crucial theme in 1971. Countries with higher dam capacities, such as Iraq and Egypt, were better positioned to support agricultural activities and manage water security, pivotal for economic stability and growth. These countries could buffer against droughts and fluctuations in water supply, demonstrating the importance of strategic investments in water infrastructure. Conversely, nations with minimal or no dam capacity faced challenges in meeting the water needs of their populations, potentially limiting agricultural output and industrial development.
Year-over-Year Changes and Trends
The 1971 data also reveals interesting trends and changes from previous years. Australia, for instance, saw a significant increase in its dam capacity per capita, rising by 1,202.39 cubic meters (57.0%). This growth indicates a focused effort to enhance water storage capabilities, likely driven by increased agricultural demands and urban expansion. Similarly, Canada experienced a notable rise of 1,023.80 cubic meters (4.3%), reflecting ongoing development of its extensive water resources. Conversely, Suriname, despite leading globally, saw a decrease of 1,679.70 cubic meters (-3.2%), suggesting potential changes in water management policies or population growth affecting per capita calculations.
Policy and Governance Influences
Policy decisions and governance frameworks played a crucial role in shaping dam capacity per capita in 1971. Countries with robust governance structures and investment in water infrastructure, such as Canada and Australia, were able to increase their storage capacities significantly. Meanwhile, nations with less effective water policies or limited financial resources, such as those reporting zero capacity, faced challenges in infrastructure development. International cooperation and support could be vital in addressing these disparities, promoting equitable access to water resources and fostering sustainable development.
Overall, the metric of dam capacity per capita in 1971 provides essential insights into global water management practices and their implications for economic and social development. The data highlights the necessity for strategic investments in water infrastructure and governance to ensure water security and support growth across diverse regions. As the world continues to grapple with climate change and population growth, understanding and improving dam capacity per capita remains a critical objective for sustainable development worldwide.
Insights by country
Mauritania
Mauritania ranked 140th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1971, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant lack of developed water storage infrastructure relative to its population at that time.
The absence of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's vast desert landscape, limited water resources, and economic challenges that hindered investment in large-scale water management projects. Additionally, Mauritania's reliance on rainfall and surface water sources exacerbated the challenges of water supply and management.
Interestingly, Mauritania is characterized by a predominantly arid climate, which necessitates effective water management solutions to support agriculture and drinking water supply. The lack of dam infrastructure in 1971 reflects the broader issues of development and resource management that the country has faced historically.
Senegal
In 1971, Senegal ranked 152nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This low capacity indicates a significant lack of large-scale water storage infrastructure relative to the population, impacting the country's ability to manage water resources effectively.
The limited dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including underinvestment in water infrastructure, economic constraints, and the challenges of developing projects in a region that often faces droughts and variable rainfall. Historically, Senegal's reliance on agriculture, which is highly dependent on seasonal rains, has exacerbated the need for improved water management systems.
Additionally, during this period, Senegal was in the early stages of development, with a focus on addressing basic needs such as education and healthcare, often at the expense of infrastructure projects like dams. As a result, the country faced challenges in water supply and agricultural productivity, which are crucial for sustaining its growing population.
Morocco
In 1971, Morocco ranked 51st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 217.592 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts in water resource management, particularly in an arid region where water scarcity can pose significant challenges.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Morocco's investment in infrastructure to support agriculture and irrigation, as well as the government's initiatives to harness water resources for economic development. The construction of dams has played a crucial role in mitigating the effects of droughts and ensuring a stable water supply for both urban and rural populations.
Interestingly, Morocco has made significant strides in water conservation and management over the decades, and the strategic planning in this sector has contributed to its resilience against climatic variations. This capacity not only supports agricultural activities but also aids in the generation of hydroelectric power, which is essential for the country's energy needs.
Togo
Togo ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1971. The country exhibited a dam capacity of 3.22221 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a modest level of water storage infrastructure relative to its population size.
This statistic reflects Togo's developing status during the early 1970s, where investments in infrastructure, including water management systems, were still in nascent stages. Factors contributing to this level of dam capacity may include limited financial resources, ongoing political challenges, and a focus on agricultural development, which often prioritized immediate food security over long-term water resource management.
Moreover, Togo's water management strategies have historically been influenced by its geographical features, with a reliance on seasonal rainfall and rivers for irrigation and domestic use. This reliance underscores the importance of effective water resource management, especially in a country where agriculture plays a crucial role in the economy and sustenance of the population.
Malaysia
In 1971, Malaysia ranked 66th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 121.897 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s growing emphasis on developing its water resource infrastructure during a period of rapid economic development and urbanization.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Malaysia's geographical features and abundant rainfall, which facilitate the construction of large reservoirs. Moreover, the government's focus on agricultural expansion and the need for irrigation systems in rural areas further propelled investments in dam infrastructure, ensuring a stable water supply for both agricultural and domestic use.
In addition to its dam capacity, it is significant to note that Malaysia has continued to develop its water management infrastructure in subsequent decades, leading to improvements in water accessibility and quality for its population. This historical context underscores the importance of dam infrastructure in supporting economic growth and sustainability in Malaysia.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked 74th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1971. The country had a dam capacity of 79.6172 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its potential for water resource management and agricultural irrigation at that time.
This statistic indicates a relatively moderate level of infrastructure investment in water management, which is critical for a country that relies heavily on agriculture, which constituted a significant portion of its economy. The existence of dams can support irrigation and mitigate flooding, thus influencing agricultural productivity.
Factors contributing to this level of dam capacity may include the country’s geographic features, previous investments in infrastructure, and the focus on developing agricultural resources to support its population. Additionally, in the years leading up to 1971, Sierra Leone experienced various economic activities that necessitated the development of water resources.
Armenia
In 1971, Armenia ranked 113th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic suggests a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population at the time, which may have implications for agricultural productivity and water supply management.
The absence of measurable dam capacity per capita could be attributed to several factors, including the country's historical reliance on natural water sources and the limited development of large-scale water infrastructure during the Soviet era. Additionally, the geopolitical situation and economic constraints faced by Armenia may have hindered investment in infrastructure projects, impacting water resource management.
It is also noteworthy that Armenia, being a landlocked country, relies heavily on rivers and lakes for its water supply. The development of dams and reservoirs is crucial for ensuring a stable water supply, particularly in a region susceptible to variations in climate and seasonal water availability.
Congo
In 1971, Congo ranked 100 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 5.89852 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s ability to harness water resources for various uses, including agriculture, energy production, and flood management.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited infrastructure investment, ongoing political instability, and economic challenges that have historically affected development. Despite its vast natural resources, the country has struggled to fully develop its hydroelectric potential.
Interestingly, Congo is home to some of the largest rivers in Africa, such as the Congo River, which has significant hydroelectric potential. However, the underutilization of these resources illustrates the gap between potential and actual dam capacity, which remains a critical issue for economic growth and sustainability in the region.
Angola
In 1971, Angola ranked 90th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 30.9793 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to harness water resources for various uses, including agriculture, domestic consumption, and hydropower generation.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Angola's historical context of colonial rule, civil conflict, and underdeveloped infrastructure, which limited the construction and maintenance of water management systems. The country's economic focus during this period was not heavily oriented towards water resource development, which may have contributed to its ranking.
Furthermore, it is noteworthy that Angola's water resources are significant, yet the challenges in utilizing them effectively have meant that many inhabitants do not benefit from adequate water management solutions. This scenario is common in many countries with developing economies, where investments in infrastructure are crucial for improving access to essential resources.
Ethiopia
In 1971, Ethiopia ranked 127th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population, reflecting the country's challenges in managing water resources effectively during that period.
The absence of recorded dam capacity highlights Ethiopia's struggles with water management, which were influenced by factors such as limited financial resources, political instability, and inadequate infrastructure development. These issues were exacerbated by the country's geographical diversity, including highland areas and lowland regions, which complicated water resource distribution.
Additionally, Ethiopia's dam capacity has seen considerable changes in subsequent decades, particularly with the rise of major projects like the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which has the potential to significantly alter the country's water management landscape and improve its ranking in dam capacity per capita in the future.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data