Dam capacity per capita 2003
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 26,410.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Iceland | 7,962.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Norway | 7,242.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Paraguay | 6,294.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Nicaragua | 6,141.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Russia | 5,497.77 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | New Zealand | 4,198.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Mozambique | 3,822.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Panama | 2,754.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Mexico | 1,456.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Portugal | 1,112.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | North Macedonia | 1,100.17 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Mali | 1,073.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Malaysia | 904.706 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | North Korea | 849.566 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Netherlands | 564.187 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Morocco | 544.107 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Romania | 512.303 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Namibia | 369.516 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Nigeria | 369.284 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Republic of Moldova | 275.308 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Peru | 209.309 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Mauritania | 178.441 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Pakistan | 166.039 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Lithuania | 144.996 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Luxembourg | 137.217 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Mongolia | 99.135 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Philippines | 83.853 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Myanmar | 82.588 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Mauritius | 74.769 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Poland | 72.242 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Libya | 69.383 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Oman | 32.947 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Madagascar | 27.305 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Saint Lucia | 15.953 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Niger | 6.515 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Malawi | 3.428 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Nepal | 3.321 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Malta | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Suriname | 39,493.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Zambia | 9,207.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Zimbabwe | 8,166.07 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Ghana | 6,973.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Venezuela | 6,080.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Iraq | 5,663.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Uruguay | 5,227.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Kazakhstan | 5,076.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,554.77 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Tajikistan | 4,350.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Sweden | 4,013.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Australia | 3,924.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Brazil | 3,860 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Finland | 3,568.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Argentina | 3,423.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Uganda | 3,035.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Tanzania | 2,809.38 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Azerbaijan | 2,559.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | United States | 2,538.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Turkey | 2,299.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Egypt | 2,160.43 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Côte d'Ivoire | 1,947.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lesotho | 1,420.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Albania | 1,292.46 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Spain | 1,263.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Laos | 1,244.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Thailand | 1,214.08 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Greece | 1,128.55 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Guyana | 1,060.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Turkmenistan | 1,021.72 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Ukraine | 976.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Cameroon | 965.984 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Syrian Arab Republic | 923.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Uzbekistan | 856.119 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Georgia | 835.617 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Bulgaria | 835.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Honduras | 815.351 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Chile | 751.453 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kenya | 735.867 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 696.993 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | El Salvador | 646.651 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | South Africa | 622.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Ecuador | 575.204 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Vietnam | 555.41 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Eswatini | 548.411 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Costa Rica | 475.181 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Armenia | 456.375 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Switzerland | 455.925 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Cuba | 448.922 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Latvia | 439.059 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Burkina Faso | 397.662 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | China | 396.638 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Iran | 395.225 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | South Korea | 340.951 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Slovakia | 321.175 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Botswana | 311.817 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Czech Republic | 310.696 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Togo | 309.333 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Sri Lanka | 297.822 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Cyprus | 280.821 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Colombia | 271.438 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Austria | 261.948 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Sao Tome and Principe | 253.553 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Dominican Republic | 252.065 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Tunisia | 250.841 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Angola | 249.124 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Japan | 244.102 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Croatia | 223.374 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Ireland | 217.634 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Guinea | 207.084 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Algeria | 206.56 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | India | 201.782 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Italy | 174.015 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | France | 164.325 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Gabon | 159.149 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Fiji | 153.529 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Belarus | 136.242 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Estonia | 133.129 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Brunei Darussalam | 129.856 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Indonesia | 102.293 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Afghanistan | 88.374 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Samoa | 53.929 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Trinidad and Tobago | 53.387 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Saudi Arabia | 53.174 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Sierra Leone | 42.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | 23.318 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | United Kingdom | 88.122 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Liberia | 76.486 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Ethiopia | 76.171 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Antigua and Barbuda | 64.468 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Bolivia | 62.757 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Lebanon | 48.613 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Bangladesh | 45.946 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Germany | 41.098 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Jordan | 38.301 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Guatemala | 36.868 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Haiti | 33.905 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Hungary | 25.364 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Yemen | 20.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Singapore | 18.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Eritrea | 17.687 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Slovenia | 16.813 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | United Arab Emirates | 14.555 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Belgium | 13.907 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 11.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Belize | 6.445 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Denmark | 3.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Benin | 2.97 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo | 2.612 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Jamaica | 2.051 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 0.955 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Grenada | 0.202 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Cambodia | 0.077 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Bahrain | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Guinea-Bissau
- #158
Cabo Verde
- #157
Bhutan
- #156
Bahrain
- #155
Cambodia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2003, the metric of "Dam capacity per capita" offered a critical lens into the global landscape of water resource management. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, serves as a key indicator of how nations manage their water resources, impacting sustainable development and water security. It underscores the significance of dam infrastructure in supporting agriculture, industry, and communities, highlighting both the achievements and challenges in water management across different regions.
Global Water Availability in 2003
The year 2003 saw significant disparities in dam capacity per capita across the globe, with a total of 161 countries providing data. Suriname led the world with an impressive 39,493.4 cubic meters per inhabitant, underscoring its abundant water resources and effective management strategies. In contrast, nations like Guinea-Bissau, Cabo Verde, and several others reported a dam capacity of zero, highlighting the challenges they face in water storage infrastructure.
The average dam capacity per capita across all countries was 1,512.44 cubic meters, with a median value of 275.31 cubic meters. This stark difference between the average and median values illustrates the wide variance in water storage capacity, influenced by geographical, climatic, and economic factors.
Regional Comparisons and Insights
Analyzing regional variations in dam capacity per capita reveals insightful patterns. North America, represented by Canada with a capacity of 26,410.2 cubic meters per inhabitant, stands out for its robust water management systems. This capacity is pivotal for supporting its vast agricultural lands and industrial needs.
In Africa, countries like Zambia and Zimbabwe exhibited notable capacities of 9,207.68 and 8,166.07 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These figures reflect substantial investments in water infrastructure, crucial for sustaining agricultural productivity in the region's arid climate. Conversely, several African nations showed minimal to no dam capacity, indicating a pressing need for development and investment to enhance water security.
Environmental and Climatic Implications
The relationship between dam capacity and environmental factors is intricate. High dam capacities in countries like Iceland (7,962.92 cubic meters per inhabitant) and Norway (7,242.78 cubic meters per inhabitant) can be attributed to their abundant natural water resources and favorable climatic conditions. These nations benefit from ample precipitation and glacial melt, which naturally enhance their water storage capabilities.
Conversely, countries with zero reported capacity, such as Bahrain and the Maldives, face geographical limitations that hinder substantial dam construction. These regions often rely on alternative methods for water storage and management, such as desalination, to meet their needs, reflecting adaptive strategies to environmental constraints.
Year-over-Year Trends and Developments
From a year-over-year perspective, the global average dam capacity per capita decreased by 0.4%, signifying a reduction of 18.32 cubic meters. This overall decline may reflect changes in water availability due to varying climatic conditions or shifts in population dynamics that affect per capita calculations.
Noteworthy increases were observed in countries like North Macedonia, which experienced a significant 39.2% rise in capacity, indicating successful enhancements in water storage infrastructure. Similarly, Algeria and Mauritius reported increases of 20.2% and 37.0%, respectively, highlighting focused efforts to improve water management systems in these regions.
On the downside, Suriname, despite leading in capacity, saw a decrease of 1.9%, reflecting potential challenges in maintaining its extensive water resources. Zambia and Canada also recorded decreases, pointing to possible factors such as droughts or shifts in water resource policies impacting availability.
Sustainability and Future Directions
The data from 2003 underscores the critical role of sustainable water management and its impact on global development. Nations with high dam capacities demonstrate the benefits of effective water storage systems in ensuring resource availability for future generations. As the world continues to grapple with climate change and population growth, the need for sustainable dam infrastructure becomes increasingly vital.
Future trends in dam capacity per capita will likely be influenced by technological advancements in water management, international cooperation on transboundary water resources, and heightened awareness of environmental sustainability. Ensuring equitable access to water resources remains a pressing challenge that requires coordinated efforts across geography, policy, and technology.
Insights by country
Mali
Mali ranks 41st out of 164 countries in dam capacity per capita as of the year 2003. The country has a dam capacity of 1073.32 cubic meters per inhabitant, highlighting its significant investment in water infrastructure to manage its limited water resources.
This notable capacity can be attributed to Mali's efforts to harness the Niger River and other water bodies for agricultural irrigation and hydroelectric power generation, which are crucial for the country's economy. Given that Mali is largely arid and semi-arid, effective water management is vital for sustaining agricultural productivity and improving the livelihoods of its population.
Additionally, the high dam capacity per capita reflects the government's initiatives to improve water accessibility and promote sustainable development, especially in rural regions where water scarcity is a pressing issue. As a related statistic, it is important to note that water resource management remains a critical challenge in Mali, given the impacts of climate change and population growth on water availability.
Dominican Republic
The Dominican Republic ranks 85th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita as of the year 2003. The country has a dam capacity of 252.065 cubic meters per inhabitant, which reflects its ability to store and manage water resources for various uses, including irrigation, hydroelectric power generation, and domestic supply.
This capacity is influenced by the country's geographical features, including its mountainous terrain and significant rainfall, which facilitate the construction of reservoirs. However, the relatively low capacity per capita compared to more industrialized nations may indicate challenges in infrastructure development and water management systems.
Additionally, the Dominican Republic has faced issues such as population growth and urbanization, which can place increased pressure on existing water resources. Efforts to enhance water storage capacity and improve management practices are crucial for addressing future demands and ensuring sustainable water availability.
Grenada
In 2003, Grenada ranked 150th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 0.20205 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low figure indicates the limited availability of water storage infrastructure in relation to the country’s population.
The modest dam capacity per capita in Grenada can be attributed to several factors, including the island's geographic size and its vulnerability to natural disasters such as hurricanes, which can damage existing water infrastructure. The economy of Grenada, heavily reliant on tourism and agriculture, also affects investment in water management systems.
As a Caribbean nation, Grenada faces unique challenges related to water resource management, especially given its small land area and population density. Additionally, the reliance on rainfall and the seasonal nature of water supply can exacerbate issues surrounding water accessibility and storage.
Denmark
In 2003, Denmark ranked 143rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 3.71015 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low capacity suggests limited reliance on large dam infrastructure for water management compared to other nations.
The statistic can be attributed to Denmark's smaller geographical size and population density, which may reduce the necessity for extensive dam systems. Moreover, Denmark has a strong focus on sustainable water management practices, often opting for alternative methods such as groundwater extraction and efficient water conservation techniques.
Interestingly, Denmark is known for its robust environmental policies and investments in renewable energy, which may shift focus from large-scale water storage solutions to enhancing overall water quality and management efficiency.
Maldives
In 2003, the Maldives ranked 156 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, which stood at 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic underscores the country's significant challenges in water resource management, particularly in a nation composed of numerous small islands with limited freshwater resources.
The lack of dam infrastructure can be attributed to various factors, including the Maldives' geographic characteristics, which make the construction of large-scale dams logistically and financially challenging. Furthermore, the reliance on rainwater harvesting and desalination technologies to meet water needs highlights the country's adaptation to its unique environmental conditions.
Additionally, the Maldives faces ongoing issues related to climate change, such as rising sea levels and increased salinity, which further complicate water supply and management. The absence of dam capacity is indicative of a broader reliance on alternative water sources, which may affect long-term sustainability and resilience against environmental changes.
Côte d'Ivoire
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 31st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1947.34 cubic meters per inhabitant in the year 2003. This statistic indicates a relatively high level of water resource management in comparison to many other nations, reflecting the country's significant investments in hydroelectric power and irrigation infrastructure.
The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Côte d'Ivoire's geographical features, including its rivers and rainfall patterns, which facilitate the development of hydroelectric projects. Additionally, the government has historically prioritized energy production and agricultural irrigation, emphasizing the importance of water resources for economic development.
Furthermore, Côte d'Ivoire's commitment to expanding its energy sector has made it a leader in West Africa, driving both domestic and regional economic growth. The country's reliance on hydroelectric power is evident, as it provides a significant portion of its electricity needs, contributing to its status as one of the more industrialized nations in the region.
United Kingdom
In 2003, the United Kingdom ranked 109th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded capacity of 88.1221 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water management capabilities and infrastructure relating to dams and reservoirs.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the UK's geographic and climatic conditions, which influence water resource availability. The country has a mix of urban and rural landscapes, with significant rainfall, allowing for effective water resource management without a reliance on extensive dam structures.
Additionally, the UK's commitment to sustainable water use and environmental protection may limit the expansion of dam facilities. As of 2003, the country's water management policies aim to balance human needs with ecological preservation, which influences dam construction and capacity strategies.
Russia
In 2003, Russia ranked 12th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive value of 5497.77 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the extensive network of dams and reservoirs that the country has developed, largely due to its vast geographical landscape and significant water resources.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Russia's abundant freshwater resources, particularly from major rivers such as the Volga and the Lena, as well as substantial government investment in hydroelectric projects. These dams serve not only to generate electricity but also for water supply, irrigation, and flood control, contributing to the overall economic and environmental management of the nation.
Interestingly, the significance of dam infrastructure extends beyond just capacity; it plays a crucial role in Russia's energy portfolio, with hydropower accounting for a notable portion of the country's electricity generation. This reliance on hydroelectric power is indicative of Russia's commitment to utilizing renewable energy resources while managing its vast and diverse natural landscapes.
Brunei Darussalam
In 2003, Brunei Darussalam ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country exhibited a dam capacity of 129.856 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its substantial investment in water infrastructure to support its population.
This relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Brunei's significant rainfall and commitment to managing its water resources effectively. The nation, being a small but wealthy country due to its oil and gas reserves, has prioritized the development of its infrastructure, including water storage facilities, to ensure a reliable water supply for its citizens.
Moreover, the government has implemented policies aimed at enhancing water conservation and management, which may contribute to this statistic. Interestingly, Brunei's per capita dam capacity is indicative of its broader efforts to maintain sustainability and environmental stewardship in its resource management practices.
Norway
In 2003, Norway ranked 6th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 7242.78 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects Norway's extensive investment in hydroelectric power, which is a significant part of its energy infrastructure and contributes to the country’s renewable energy strategy.
The substantial dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Norway's geographical features, including numerous rivers and steep terrain, which are ideal for hydroelectric projects. Additionally, Norway has a long-standing commitment to sustainable energy practices, leading to the construction of numerous dams throughout the 20th century, thereby enhancing its energy independence and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Interestingly, Norway produces around 95% of its electricity from hydropower, making it one of the leaders in renewable energy in the world. This not only underscores the importance of dam capacity for energy generation but also highlights Norway's role as a model for sustainable energy practices globally.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data