Dam capacity per capita 1970

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
2,109.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
410.737 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
292.345 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
177.943 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Austria flag
Austria
176.928 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
174.214 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Algeria flag
Algeria
131.006 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
77.811 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Angola flag
Angola
31.711 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
93.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Canada flag
Canada
23,849.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,470.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Chile flag
Chile
898.951 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Botswana flag
Botswana
372.332 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
333.089 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
China flag
China
242.485 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
184.253 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Colombia flag
Colombia
174.658 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Cuba flag
Cuba
80.205 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
61.182 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
45.341 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
40.622 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
20.066 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Congo flag
Congo
6.082 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Denmark flag
Denmark
4.058 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
3.751 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1.794 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.632 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Egypt flag
Egypt
4,857.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
359.518 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
129.438 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
17.172 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ghana flag
Ghana
16,591.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
13,055.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Finland flag
Finland
3,848.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,762.25 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
849.718 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Greece flag
Greece
755.621 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Iran flag
Iran
383.902 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Ireland flag
Ireland
293.442 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Guyana flag
Guyana
259.013 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
India flag
India
192.356 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Liberia flag
Liberia
162.681 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
France flag
France
147.891 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Italy flag
Italy
144.596 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Japan flag
Japan
97.06 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
92.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Haiti flag
Haiti
64.076 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Guinea flag
Guinea
55.406 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
48.869 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Germany flag
Germany
33.083 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Honduras flag
Honduras
4.795 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Jordan flag
Jordan
4.217 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.902 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Hungary flag
Hungary
1.309 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.152 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
0.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.061 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Iceland flag
Iceland
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Laos flag
Laos
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
6.454 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
13,194.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Norway flag
Norway
4,461.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Panama flag
Panama
3,856.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
2,451.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
2,208.61 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,335.25 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,132.04 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Portugal flag
Portugal
569.005 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Namibia flag
Namibia
461.488 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
450.809 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
341.838 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Peru flag
Peru
225.312 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
224.658 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Morocco flag
Morocco
198.923 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
193.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
152.147 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
124.826 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
76.079 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
73.21 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mali flag
Mali
27.882 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Malawi flag
Malawi
9.011 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Romania flag
Romania
112.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
55.54 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
25.202 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Niger flag
Niger
3.069 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Poland flag
Poland
54.246 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Philippines flag
Philippines
42.528 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
14.316 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
52,709 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
22,080 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
18,618.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
7,750.73 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
7,476.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
4,069.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sweden flag
Sweden
3,259.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
2,997.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Spain flag
Spain
1,066.51 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Thailand flag
Thailand
756.514 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
540.573 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
504.213 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
498.922 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Turkey flag
Turkey
351.543 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
342.136 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
101.452 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
81.195 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
81.112 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
13.196 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
220.876 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
South Korea flag
South Korea
78.311 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
53.981 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
25.084 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
3.327 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.741 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  5. #5Austria flagAustria
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Algeria flagAlgeria
  8. #8Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda
  9. #9Angola flagAngola
  10. #10Armenia flagArmenia

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  9. #156Syrian Arab Republic flagSyrian Arab Republic
  10. #155Sudan flagSudan

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1970, the global landscape of water management highlighted a key metric: dam capacity per capita. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, provides a crucial window into how countries manage water resources, impacting sustainability, agriculture, industry, and community well-being. Understanding this metric is vital for addressing water security challenges and supporting development across diverse regions.

Global Distribution of Dam Capacity in 1970

The year 1970 witnessed substantial disparities in dam capacity per capita across the globe. Out of 120 countries with available data, Suriname led with an astounding 52,709 cubic meters per inhabitant, showcasing its abundant water resources. In stark contrast, several countries, including Rwanda, Cambodia, and Nepal, reported no significant dam capacity, highlighting regional disparities in water infrastructure development.

Canada, with 23,849.9 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflected its robust natural water storage capabilities, primarily from its vast river systems and lakes. African nations like Zambia and Zimbabwe also figured at the top, with capacities of 22,080 and 18,618.5 cubic meters, respectively, underscoring the continent's potential for water resource management. However, South American and South-East Asian countries, such as Fiji and Belize, showed negligible to no dam capacity, pointing towards the need for infrastructure development.

Climatic and Environmental Impact

Climatic conditions play a pivotal role in shaping a country's dam capacity. Regions with abundant rainfall, such as parts of South America and Africa, have naturally higher water retention capabilities. This is evident in the case of Suriname and Ghana, where the high rainfall translates into substantial water storage per capita. Conversely, arid regions or those prone to drought, like parts of the Middle East, often struggle with low dam capacities, despite significant efforts to increase water storage.

Within this climatic context, the increase in dam capacities in countries like Iraq and Egypt is noteworthy. Egypt, in particular, saw a dramatic rise of 4,674.54 cubic meters per inhabitant, a 2550.6% increase from previous years. This surge can be attributed to the completion of crucial infrastructure projects like the Aswan High Dam, which has had a transformative impact on water management and agriculture in the region.

Economic and Developmental Insights

The economic implications of dam capacity are profound. Countries with higher capacities can support extensive agricultural activities, contributing to food security and economic stability. For example, the high dam capacity in Canada supports its vast agricultural landscape and hydroelectric power generation, reinforcing economic resilience.

On the developmental front, countries with limited dam capacity face challenges in sustaining agricultural and industrial activities, which are crucial for economic growth. The absence of significant dam infrastructure in countries like Rwanda, Belize, and Bhutan highlights a developmental gap that could hinder economic advancements and exacerbate water scarcity issues.

Interestingly, the data reveals both increases and decreases in dam capacities from the previous year. Norway and Finland, for instance, saw modest increases, reflecting continual investment in enhancing water infrastructure. However, countries like Suriname and Zambia experienced slight declines, possibly due to environmental changes or alterations in water management policies.

Regional Variations and Policy Implications

Regional variations in dam capacity per capita underscore the critical role of policy in water management. In regions where dam capacities are high, proactive policies have likely contributed to effective water storage and management practices. In contrast, regions with low capacities may require strategic policy interventions to bolster infrastructure development and ensure sustainable water supply.

Policy implications are particularly evident in African and Middle Eastern countries, where increasing demands for water necessitate urgent policy attention. Countries like Egypt and Iraq, with their significant year-over-year increases, serve as examples of how targeted investments in water infrastructure can yield substantial benefits.

Historical Perspective and Future Projections

The historical context of dam capacity in 1970 provides a snapshot of global water management strategies at a time when environmental awareness and technological capabilities were evolving. The variances observed in this year may serve as a basis for projecting future trends, especially as climate change and population growth continue to exert pressure on water resources.

Looking ahead, investments in dam infrastructure and integrated water resource management will be crucial. Regions with low or declining capacities must prioritize sustainable practices and international cooperation to address water scarcity and support economic development. As countries navigate these challenges, the lessons from 1970 remain pertinent, highlighting the importance of strategic planning and international collaboration in achieving water security for all.

Insights by country

1

Ghana

In 1970, Ghana ranked 5th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive capacity of 16,591.1 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects the country's substantial investment in hydroelectric power and irrigation systems, which are critical for both agricultural productivity and energy generation.

The notable dam capacity per capita in Ghana can be attributed to several factors, including the construction of significant infrastructure such as the Akosombo Dam, which was completed in 1966 and plays a pivotal role in the country's electricity supply and economic development. The emphasis on harnessing water resources for energy needs has historically positioned Ghana as a key player in water management in West Africa.

Additionally, the country's water resources management strategy has enabled it to support agricultural practices, contributing to food security and rural development. This investment in dam infrastructure has not only fostered energy independence but also facilitated regional cooperation in water management across neighboring countries.

2

Angola

In 1970, Angola ranked 88th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 31.7114 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to harness and store water resources, which is critical for agricultural and domestic use.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita during this period can be attributed to several factors, including the country's ongoing civil conflict, which began shortly after its independence in 1975. This conflict hindered infrastructure development and investment in water management systems. Additionally, Angola's diverse geography, which includes both arid and tropical regions, poses challenges for water resource management.

Interestingly, despite the challenges faced in 1970, Angola is rich in water resources, with numerous rivers and potential sites for dam construction, suggesting that future investments could significantly enhance water storage capacity and access for its population.

3

Trinidad and Tobago

In 1970, Trinidad and Tobago ranked 91 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 25.0839 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country’s investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for both domestic consumption and agricultural needs.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Trinidad and Tobago's geographic characteristics, including its abundant rainfall and river systems, which facilitate the construction of reservoirs. Additionally, the government's focus on developing infrastructure during the post-independence period likely contributed to the increase in water storage capacity.

Notably, Trinidad and Tobago’s dam capacity is a critical component of its water supply system, supporting both urban and rural populations. As a comparison, the country's efforts in water management have enabled it to maintain a stable water supply amidst varying climatic conditions, a necessity given the Caribbean's vulnerability to droughts and hurricanes.

4

Congo, Democratic Republic of the

In 1970, the Democratic Republic of the Congo ranked 107th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country had a dam capacity of 1.63218 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting the limited infrastructure for water management and energy production at that time.

This relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's political instability, economic challenges, and underdeveloped infrastructure. Following a turbulent colonial history and subsequent conflicts, the DRC faced significant hurdles in developing its natural resources effectively.

Additionally, it is important to note that the DRC is endowed with abundant water resources, yet inadequate investment in infrastructure has hindered the full utilization of these resources for hydroelectric power generation. The country possesses some of Africa's largest rivers, which have the potential to support substantial hydroelectric projects that could greatly increase dam capacity in future years.

5

Burkina Faso

In 1970, Burkina Faso ranked 86 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 40.6224 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's relatively limited water storage capabilities in relation to its population, which can impact agricultural productivity and water availability.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic features, economic constraints, and historical underinvestment in infrastructure. Burkina Faso is predominantly arid, with seasonal rainfall patterns that necessitate effective water management systems to support agriculture and domestic needs.

Additionally, as a landlocked country in West Africa, Burkina Faso faces challenges in securing the necessary resources for expansive water projects. The reliance on small-scale irrigation and traditional farming methods has historically limited the development of large-scale dam projects, which are essential for enhancing water storage and management in the face of climate variability.

6

Benin

In 1970, Benin had a dam capacity per capita of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking 118 out of 164 countries in this metric. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure development concerning water management and storage, which is critical for agricultural, industrial, and domestic water supply.

The absence of significant dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including economic challenges, limited investment in infrastructure, and a focus on more immediate social needs during this period. Additionally, the political instability prevalent in the region during the late 1960s and early 1970s may have diverted attention and resources away from long-term infrastructure projects.

Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the lack of water management systems can exacerbate issues related to food security and economic development, as agriculture heavily relies on reliable water sources. Improved dam capacity in subsequent decades has been essential for addressing these challenges and enhancing sustainable development in Benin.

7

Belize

In 1970, Belize ranked 117 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the limited infrastructure for water storage and management in the country during this period, which could have been influenced by Belize's relatively low level of industrialization and investment in large-scale water projects.

The absence of dam capacity per capita suggests challenges in water resource management that could impact agricultural practices, drinking water availability, and flood control measures. Factors contributing to this situation may include a focus on immediate economic needs, a lack of technological advancement in civil engineering, and limited financial resources for the development of water infrastructure.

Interestingly, Belize's geographical features, including its abundant rainfall and natural water systems, might have reduced the immediate necessity for extensive dam construction at the time. This context underscores the importance of ongoing investments in water management systems to support sustainable development in the region.

8

Cabo Verde

Cabo Verde ranked 121st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1970. The recorded value for dam capacity per capita during this period was null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a lack of significant dam infrastructure relative to its population.

This statistic can be attributed to Cabo Verde's geographical and climatic conditions, which include a limited availability of freshwater resources due to its arid environment and small land area. The country's reliance on rainfall and groundwater for water supply further exacerbates the challenges in water storage and management.

Additionally, Cabo Verde has historically faced economic constraints that have hindered the development of large-scale infrastructure projects, including dams. The situation highlights the importance of sustainable water management solutions in island nations where freshwater scarcity is a pressing issue.

9

Algeria

In 1970, Algeria ranked 62nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 131.006 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water resource management and infrastructure development during a period of significant national growth following its independence in 1962.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Algeria's efforts to harness its water resources, particularly in the context of agriculture and urban development. The government prioritized the construction of dams to support irrigation and provide water to rapidly growing cities, addressing the needs of a population that was expanding due to both natural growth and migration.

Additionally, it is important to note that Algeria's geographical features, including the Sahara Desert and varying climatic conditions, necessitated effective water management strategies to ensure sustainable resource availability. The country’s focus on dam construction during this time laid the groundwork for future water management policies and helped mitigate the challenges posed by arid conditions.

10

Bolivia

In 1970, Bolivia ranked 78th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive capacity of 61.1818 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant infrastructure investment in water management, which is crucial for the predominantly agricultural economy of Bolivia.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Bolivia's diverse geography, which includes the Andes Mountains and various river systems, enabling the construction of dams for hydroelectric power and irrigation. Such infrastructure supports both energy production and agricultural activities, vital for the country's development.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that Bolivia has a history of relying on its water resources for sustaining its population and fostering economic growth. The investment in dams not only aids in managing water supply but also enhances resilience against natural climatic variations, such as droughts, which can significantly impact agricultural output.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts