Dam capacity per capita 1970
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Australia | 2,109.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Bulgaria | 410.737 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 292.345 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Afghanistan | 177.943 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Austria | 176.928 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 174.214 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Algeria | 131.006 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Antigua and Barbuda | 77.811 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Angola | 31.711 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bangladesh | 93.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Canada | 23,849.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Brazil | 4,470.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Chile | 898.951 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Botswana | 372.332 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Brunei Darussalam | 333.089 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | China | 242.485 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Côte d'Ivoire | 184.253 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Colombia | 174.658 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Cuba | 80.205 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Bolivia | 61.182 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Cyprus | 45.341 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Burkina Faso | 40.622 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Costa Rica | 20.066 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Congo | 6.082 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Denmark | 4.058 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 3.751 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Cameroon | 1.794 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.632 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Benin | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Egypt | 4,857.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | El Salvador | 359.518 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Eswatini | 129.438 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Ecuador | 17.172 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Ghana | 16,591.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Iraq | 13,055.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Finland | 3,848.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Kenya | 1,762.25 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Lesotho | 849.718 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Greece | 755.621 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Iran | 383.902 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Ireland | 293.442 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Guyana | 259.013 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | India | 192.356 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Liberia | 162.681 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | France | 147.891 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Italy | 144.596 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Japan | 97.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Lebanon | 92.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Haiti | 64.076 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Guinea | 55.406 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Indonesia | 48.869 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Germany | 33.083 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Honduras | 4.795 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Jordan | 4.217 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Jamaica | 2.902 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Hungary | 1.309 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Guatemala | 0.152 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Dominican Republic | 0.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Fiji | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Gabon | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Grenada | 0.061 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Iceland | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Laos | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 6.454 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 13,194.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Norway | 4,461.85 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Panama | 3,856.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | New Zealand | 2,451.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Mozambique | 2,208.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Mexico | 1,335.25 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | North Korea | 1,132.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Portugal | 569.005 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Namibia | 461.488 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Netherlands | 450.809 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Nigeria | 341.838 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Peru | 225.312 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Pakistan | 224.658 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Morocco | 198.923 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Mongolia | 193.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Luxembourg | 152.147 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Malaysia | 124.826 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Mauritius | 76.079 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Madagascar | 73.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Mali | 27.882 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Malawi | 9.011 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Romania | 112.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Myanmar | 55.54 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Saint Lucia | 25.202 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Niger | 3.069 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Nepal | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Poland | 54.246 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Philippines | 42.528 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Paraguay | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 14.316 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 52,709 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 22,080 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 18,618.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uganda | 7,750.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Tanzania | 7,476.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Uruguay | 4,069.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sweden | 3,259.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 2,997.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Spain | 1,066.51 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Thailand | 756.514 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Vietnam | 540.573 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Switzerland | 504.213 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Venezuela | 498.922 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Turkey | 351.543 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Sri Lanka | 342.136 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Tunisia | 101.452 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 81.195 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 81.112 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 13.196 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 220.876 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | South Korea | 78.311 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Syrian Arab Republic | 53.981 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 25.084 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 3.327 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.741 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Australia
- #2
Bulgaria
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Afghanistan
- #5
Austria
- #6
Albania
- #7
Algeria
- #8
Antigua and Barbuda
- #9
Angola
- #10
Armenia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tajikistan
- #156
Syrian Arab Republic
- #155
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1970, the global landscape of water management highlighted a key metric: dam capacity per capita. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, provides a crucial window into how countries manage water resources, impacting sustainability, agriculture, industry, and community well-being. Understanding this metric is vital for addressing water security challenges and supporting development across diverse regions.
Global Distribution of Dam Capacity in 1970
The year 1970 witnessed substantial disparities in dam capacity per capita across the globe. Out of 120 countries with available data, Suriname led with an astounding 52,709 cubic meters per inhabitant, showcasing its abundant water resources. In stark contrast, several countries, including Rwanda, Cambodia, and Nepal, reported no significant dam capacity, highlighting regional disparities in water infrastructure development.
Canada, with 23,849.9 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflected its robust natural water storage capabilities, primarily from its vast river systems and lakes. African nations like Zambia and Zimbabwe also figured at the top, with capacities of 22,080 and 18,618.5 cubic meters, respectively, underscoring the continent's potential for water resource management. However, South American and South-East Asian countries, such as Fiji and Belize, showed negligible to no dam capacity, pointing towards the need for infrastructure development.
Climatic and Environmental Impact
Climatic conditions play a pivotal role in shaping a country's dam capacity. Regions with abundant rainfall, such as parts of South America and Africa, have naturally higher water retention capabilities. This is evident in the case of Suriname and Ghana, where the high rainfall translates into substantial water storage per capita. Conversely, arid regions or those prone to drought, like parts of the Middle East, often struggle with low dam capacities, despite significant efforts to increase water storage.
Within this climatic context, the increase in dam capacities in countries like Iraq and Egypt is noteworthy. Egypt, in particular, saw a dramatic rise of 4,674.54 cubic meters per inhabitant, a 2550.6% increase from previous years. This surge can be attributed to the completion of crucial infrastructure projects like the Aswan High Dam, which has had a transformative impact on water management and agriculture in the region.
Economic and Developmental Insights
The economic implications of dam capacity are profound. Countries with higher capacities can support extensive agricultural activities, contributing to food security and economic stability. For example, the high dam capacity in Canada supports its vast agricultural landscape and hydroelectric power generation, reinforcing economic resilience.
On the developmental front, countries with limited dam capacity face challenges in sustaining agricultural and industrial activities, which are crucial for economic growth. The absence of significant dam infrastructure in countries like Rwanda, Belize, and Bhutan highlights a developmental gap that could hinder economic advancements and exacerbate water scarcity issues.
Interestingly, the data reveals both increases and decreases in dam capacities from the previous year. Norway and Finland, for instance, saw modest increases, reflecting continual investment in enhancing water infrastructure. However, countries like Suriname and Zambia experienced slight declines, possibly due to environmental changes or alterations in water management policies.
Regional Variations and Policy Implications
Regional variations in dam capacity per capita underscore the critical role of policy in water management. In regions where dam capacities are high, proactive policies have likely contributed to effective water storage and management practices. In contrast, regions with low capacities may require strategic policy interventions to bolster infrastructure development and ensure sustainable water supply.
Policy implications are particularly evident in African and Middle Eastern countries, where increasing demands for water necessitate urgent policy attention. Countries like Egypt and Iraq, with their significant year-over-year increases, serve as examples of how targeted investments in water infrastructure can yield substantial benefits.
Historical Perspective and Future Projections
The historical context of dam capacity in 1970 provides a snapshot of global water management strategies at a time when environmental awareness and technological capabilities were evolving. The variances observed in this year may serve as a basis for projecting future trends, especially as climate change and population growth continue to exert pressure on water resources.
Looking ahead, investments in dam infrastructure and integrated water resource management will be crucial. Regions with low or declining capacities must prioritize sustainable practices and international cooperation to address water scarcity and support economic development. As countries navigate these challenges, the lessons from 1970 remain pertinent, highlighting the importance of strategic planning and international collaboration in achieving water security for all.
Insights by country
Ghana
In 1970, Ghana ranked 5th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive capacity of 16,591.1 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects the country's substantial investment in hydroelectric power and irrigation systems, which are critical for both agricultural productivity and energy generation.
The notable dam capacity per capita in Ghana can be attributed to several factors, including the construction of significant infrastructure such as the Akosombo Dam, which was completed in 1966 and plays a pivotal role in the country's electricity supply and economic development. The emphasis on harnessing water resources for energy needs has historically positioned Ghana as a key player in water management in West Africa.
Additionally, the country's water resources management strategy has enabled it to support agricultural practices, contributing to food security and rural development. This investment in dam infrastructure has not only fostered energy independence but also facilitated regional cooperation in water management across neighboring countries.
Angola
In 1970, Angola ranked 88th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 31.7114 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to harness and store water resources, which is critical for agricultural and domestic use.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita during this period can be attributed to several factors, including the country's ongoing civil conflict, which began shortly after its independence in 1975. This conflict hindered infrastructure development and investment in water management systems. Additionally, Angola's diverse geography, which includes both arid and tropical regions, poses challenges for water resource management.
Interestingly, despite the challenges faced in 1970, Angola is rich in water resources, with numerous rivers and potential sites for dam construction, suggesting that future investments could significantly enhance water storage capacity and access for its population.
Trinidad and Tobago
In 1970, Trinidad and Tobago ranked 91 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 25.0839 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country’s investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for both domestic consumption and agricultural needs.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Trinidad and Tobago's geographic characteristics, including its abundant rainfall and river systems, which facilitate the construction of reservoirs. Additionally, the government's focus on developing infrastructure during the post-independence period likely contributed to the increase in water storage capacity.
Notably, Trinidad and Tobago’s dam capacity is a critical component of its water supply system, supporting both urban and rural populations. As a comparison, the country's efforts in water management have enabled it to maintain a stable water supply amidst varying climatic conditions, a necessity given the Caribbean's vulnerability to droughts and hurricanes.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
In 1970, the Democratic Republic of the Congo ranked 107th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country had a dam capacity of 1.63218 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting the limited infrastructure for water management and energy production at that time.
This relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's political instability, economic challenges, and underdeveloped infrastructure. Following a turbulent colonial history and subsequent conflicts, the DRC faced significant hurdles in developing its natural resources effectively.
Additionally, it is important to note that the DRC is endowed with abundant water resources, yet inadequate investment in infrastructure has hindered the full utilization of these resources for hydroelectric power generation. The country possesses some of Africa's largest rivers, which have the potential to support substantial hydroelectric projects that could greatly increase dam capacity in future years.
Burkina Faso
In 1970, Burkina Faso ranked 86 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 40.6224 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's relatively limited water storage capabilities in relation to its population, which can impact agricultural productivity and water availability.
The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic features, economic constraints, and historical underinvestment in infrastructure. Burkina Faso is predominantly arid, with seasonal rainfall patterns that necessitate effective water management systems to support agriculture and domestic needs.
Additionally, as a landlocked country in West Africa, Burkina Faso faces challenges in securing the necessary resources for expansive water projects. The reliance on small-scale irrigation and traditional farming methods has historically limited the development of large-scale dam projects, which are essential for enhancing water storage and management in the face of climate variability.
Benin
In 1970, Benin had a dam capacity per capita of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking 118 out of 164 countries in this metric. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure development concerning water management and storage, which is critical for agricultural, industrial, and domestic water supply.
The absence of significant dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including economic challenges, limited investment in infrastructure, and a focus on more immediate social needs during this period. Additionally, the political instability prevalent in the region during the late 1960s and early 1970s may have diverted attention and resources away from long-term infrastructure projects.
Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the lack of water management systems can exacerbate issues related to food security and economic development, as agriculture heavily relies on reliable water sources. Improved dam capacity in subsequent decades has been essential for addressing these challenges and enhancing sustainable development in Benin.
Belize
In 1970, Belize ranked 117 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the limited infrastructure for water storage and management in the country during this period, which could have been influenced by Belize's relatively low level of industrialization and investment in large-scale water projects.
The absence of dam capacity per capita suggests challenges in water resource management that could impact agricultural practices, drinking water availability, and flood control measures. Factors contributing to this situation may include a focus on immediate economic needs, a lack of technological advancement in civil engineering, and limited financial resources for the development of water infrastructure.
Interestingly, Belize's geographical features, including its abundant rainfall and natural water systems, might have reduced the immediate necessity for extensive dam construction at the time. This context underscores the importance of ongoing investments in water management systems to support sustainable development in the region.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde ranked 121st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1970. The recorded value for dam capacity per capita during this period was null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a lack of significant dam infrastructure relative to its population.
This statistic can be attributed to Cabo Verde's geographical and climatic conditions, which include a limited availability of freshwater resources due to its arid environment and small land area. The country's reliance on rainfall and groundwater for water supply further exacerbates the challenges in water storage and management.
Additionally, Cabo Verde has historically faced economic constraints that have hindered the development of large-scale infrastructure projects, including dams. The situation highlights the importance of sustainable water management solutions in island nations where freshwater scarcity is a pressing issue.
Algeria
In 1970, Algeria ranked 62nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 131.006 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water resource management and infrastructure development during a period of significant national growth following its independence in 1962.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Algeria's efforts to harness its water resources, particularly in the context of agriculture and urban development. The government prioritized the construction of dams to support irrigation and provide water to rapidly growing cities, addressing the needs of a population that was expanding due to both natural growth and migration.
Additionally, it is important to note that Algeria's geographical features, including the Sahara Desert and varying climatic conditions, necessitated effective water management strategies to ensure sustainable resource availability. The country’s focus on dam construction during this time laid the groundwork for future water management policies and helped mitigate the challenges posed by arid conditions.
Bolivia
In 1970, Bolivia ranked 78th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive capacity of 61.1818 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant infrastructure investment in water management, which is crucial for the predominantly agricultural economy of Bolivia.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Bolivia's diverse geography, which includes the Andes Mountains and various river systems, enabling the construction of dams for hydroelectric power and irrigation. Such infrastructure supports both energy production and agricultural activities, vital for the country's development.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that Bolivia has a history of relying on its water resources for sustaining its population and fostering economic growth. The investment in dams not only aids in managing water supply but also enhances resilience against natural climatic variations, such as droughts, which can significantly impact agricultural output.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data