Dam capacity per capita 2001
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 26,928.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Iceland | 8,090.07 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Ghana | 7,363.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Norway | 7,324.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Paraguay | 6,463.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Nicaragua | 6,290.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Russia | 5,485.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | New Zealand | 4,339.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Mozambique | 3,999.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Panama | 2,836.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Mali | 1,142.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Mexico | 1,115.16 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Malaysia | 949.047 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | North Macedonia | 793.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | North Korea | 749.364 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Portugal | 722.664 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Morocco | 586.414 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Netherlands | 570.609 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Romania | 504.673 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Nigeria | 390.156 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Namibia | 381.537 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Republic of Moldova | 269.108 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Peru | 214.089 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Mauritania | 186.654 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Pakistan | 174.198 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Lithuania | 142.585 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Luxembourg | 140.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Mongolia | 100.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Myanmar | 83.113 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Poland | 72.159 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Libya | 72.153 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Philippines | 66.989 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Mauritius | 54.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Oman | 32.629 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Madagascar | 28.971 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Saint Lucia | 16.226 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Niger | 6.994 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Malawi | 3.602 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Nepal | 3.419 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Malta | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Suriname | 41,104.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Zambia | 9,794.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Zimbabwe | 8,343.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Venezuela | 6,147.12 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Iraq | 6,024.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Uruguay | 5,238.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Kazakhstan | 5,132.85 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,633.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Tajikistan | 4,521.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Sweden | 4,042.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Australia | 4,016.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Brazil | 3,941.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Finland | 3,585.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Argentina | 3,484.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Uganda | 3,232.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Tanzania | 2,960.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Azerbaijan | 2,610.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | United States | 2,588.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Turkey | 2,347.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Egypt | 2,253.08 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2,048.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lesotho | 1,409.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Laos | 1,284.08 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Spain | 1,282.48 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Albania | 1,280.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Thailand | 1,237.29 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Greece | 1,136.38 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Turkmenistan | 1,062.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Guyana | 1,058.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Cameroon | 1,019.67 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Syrian Arab Republic | 967.275 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Ukraine | 961.169 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Honduras | 858.932 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Uzbekistan | 857.38 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Bulgaria | 822.153 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Georgia | 810.973 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Kenya | 783.182 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Chile | 767.786 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 696.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | El Salvador | 649.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | South Africa | 635.156 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Ecuador | 590.152 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Eswatini | 556.569 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Vietnam | 550.239 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Costa Rica | 490.071 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Switzerland | 462.679 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Cuba | 451.55 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Armenia | 449.661 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Latvia | 429.799 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Burkina Faso | 422.776 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | China | 401.371 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Iran | 391.664 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | South Korea | 344.362 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Togo | 325.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Botswana | 323.378 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Slovakia | 320.982 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Czech Republic | 311.212 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Sri Lanka | 303.158 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Cyprus | 288.246 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Colombia | 274.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Angola | 266.923 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Sao Tome and Principe | 266.439 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Austria | 264.566 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Dominican Republic | 259.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Japan | 239.542 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Tunisia | 226.67 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Ireland | 224.956 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Croatia | 223.665 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Guinea | 215.106 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | India | 209.063 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Italy | 175.333 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Algeria | 173.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Gabon | 167.992 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | France | 166.618 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Fiji | 156.545 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Brunei Darussalam | 135.034 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Belarus | 134.392 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Estonia | 131.468 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Indonesia | 104.696 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Afghanistan | 99.042 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 57.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | 54.595 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Trinidad and Tobago | 53.917 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Sierra Leone | 46.881 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | 24.479 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | United Kingdom | 88.913 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Ethiopia | 80.934 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Liberia | 79.129 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Antigua and Barbuda | 66.006 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Bolivia | 64.108 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Lebanon | 49.978 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Bangladesh | 47.345 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Germany | 41.187 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Guatemala | 38.543 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Haiti | 35.123 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Jordan | 32.628 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Hungary | 25.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Yemen | 20.821 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Eritrea | 19.078 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Singapore | 18.197 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Slovenia | 16.837 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | United Arab Emirates | 14.431 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Belgium | 14.027 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 11.82 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Belize | 6.844 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Denmark | 3.732 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Benin | 3.156 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo | 2.75 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Jamaica | 2.077 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.014 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Grenada | 0.204 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Cambodia | 0.079 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Bahrain | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Guinea-Bissau
- #158
Cabo Verde
- #157
Bhutan
- #156
Bahrain
- #155
Cambodia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2001, the metric of dam capacity per capita emerged as a critical indicator of water resource management worldwide. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, reflects the capacity for each individual within a country to access stored water, underscoring its importance in sustainability, agriculture, and community development. As global populations continued to grow, understanding these capacities allowed for strategic planning in water security, especially in the face of increasing environmental changes.
Global Distribution of Dam Capacity
The global distribution of dam capacity per capita in 2001 presented striking contrasts among nations. Suriname stood at the forefront with a staggering 41,104.9 cubic meters per inhabitant, highlighting its abundant water resources relative to its population. This was followed by countries like Canada and Zambia, with capacities of 26,928.6 and 9,794.83 cubic meters per capita, respectively. Such high capacities often correlate with vast geographical expanses and significant investments in hydropower infrastructure.
Conversely, several countries reported negligible or zero dam capacity per capita, including the Maldives, Bhutan, and Malta. These figures point towards various factors such as limited freshwater resources, smaller land areas, or a reliance on alternative water management strategies like desalination or groundwater extraction.
Environmental and Climatic Significance
The environmental implications of dam capacity per capita cannot be overstated. High dam capacities in countries like Iceland and Norway align with their natural abundance of rivers and lakes, which are crucial for hydroelectric power production. These renewable energy sources contribute to the countries' sustainability goals, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing carbon footprints.
In contrast, nations with minimal capacity, such as Bahrain and the State of Palestine, face challenges in securing adequate water supplies for their populations, exacerbating vulnerabilities to climate change. These regions may experience heightened water stress due to diminished rainfall and increasing temperatures, necessitating innovative solutions to water scarcity.
Regional and Continental Trends
Analyzing regional trends reveals noteworthy disparities in dam capacity distribution. In Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe showcase significant dam capacities, indicative of targeted investments in water storage for agricultural purposes. These investments are critical for enhancing food security and supporting economic growth.
Latin American countries such as Paraguay and Venezuela also report high capacities, reflecting large-scale projects in hydroelectric power generation and irrigation. These initiatives are pivotal in industrial development and supporting rural communities, illustrating the integral role of water management in regional stability.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The year 2001 saw varied changes in dam capacity per capita across different nations. Eswatini marked the most significant increase, with a 129.1% rise, indicating substantial improvements in water infrastructure. This growth is vital for supporting the nation's agricultural and industrial sectors, fostering economic resilience.
Conversely, Suriname experienced a 2.0% decrease in capacity, attributed to a combination of population growth and potential infrastructure deterioration. Such declines underscore the need for continuous maintenance and investment in water storage facilities to sustain development goals.
Policy Implications and Future Directions
The measurement of dam capacity per capita in 2001 highlights critical policy implications for nations worldwide. Countries with low capacities are urged to enhance their water management strategies, focusing on sustainable practices and technology-driven solutions. Investments in infrastructure, such as dam rehabilitation and expansion, are essential to meet future demands.
International cooperation and knowledge exchange play a crucial role in addressing global water challenges. By sharing expertise and resources, countries can develop innovative approaches to maximize water availability, ensuring equitable access for all and contributing to global water security goals.
In summary, the data on dam capacity per capita in 2001 provides valuable insights into the worldwide landscape of water resource management. Understanding these patterns is vital for fostering sustainable development, safeguarding against environmental risks, and ensuring the well-being of populations globally. As we move forward, continued focus on this metric will aid in navigating the complex challenges of water security in the 21st century.
Insights by country
Maldives
In 2001, the Maldives ranked 156th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant reliance on rainfall and groundwater resources rather than large-scale dam infrastructure for water supply and management.
The Maldives, an archipelago composed of 26 atolls, faces unique geographical challenges that contribute to this low dam capacity. The nation's topography, characterized by low elevation and limited land area, restricts the feasibility and necessity for large dams, which are more common in larger landlocked countries.
Furthermore, the absence of substantial freshwater reservoirs necessitates a focus on alternative water management strategies, such as rainwater harvesting and desalination. This reliance is further compounded by the Maldives' vulnerability to climate change, which poses risks to freshwater availability and necessitates adaptive water management practices.
Cameroon
In 2001, Cameroon ranked 42nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a capacity of 1019.67 cubic meters per inhabitant. This substantial figure reflects the country's investment in hydroelectric power and water resource management, which are crucial for supporting its growing population and agricultural needs.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Cameroon's diverse topography, which includes significant river systems such as the Sanaga and Wouri rivers, enabling the construction of various dams for energy generation and irrigation. Additionally, the government has emphasized infrastructure development to harness these water resources effectively.
Interestingly, Cameroon’s dam capacity is part of a broader strategy to promote sustainable energy and mitigate the impacts of climate change, as hydropower accounts for a significant portion of the nation’s electricity generation. This focus on renewable energy sources is vital for the country's economic development and energy security.
Lesotho
In the year 2001, Lesotho ranked 32nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a significant capacity of 1409.6 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high per capita dam capacity reflects the country's extensive investment in water infrastructure, largely due to its mountainous terrain and the need for efficient water management.
The substantial dam capacity in Lesotho is influenced by its geographical features, which include numerous rivers and high-altitude regions conducive to water collection and storage. The country relies heavily on hydropower for electricity generation, with dams playing a critical role in supporting both domestic and regional energy needs.
Interestingly, Lesotho's water resources are not only vital for its own population but also contribute to the water supply for neighboring South Africa, highlighting the interconnectedness of water management in the region. The reliance on dam infrastructure underscores the importance of sustainable water resource management in addressing both current and future demands.
Germany
In the year 2001, Germany ranked 125th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 41.1874 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s extensive network of dams that support various functions, including hydroelectric power generation, irrigation, and flood control.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Germany's advanced infrastructure and efficient water management systems, which may reduce the reliance on large dam projects compared to other nations. Additionally, Germany's commitment to renewable energy sources has led to a diversification of its energy portfolio, which includes a focus on wind and solar power.
As a part of its water resource management, Germany has implemented stringent environmental regulations that govern the construction and operation of dams, ensuring sustainable practices. This regulatory environment may contribute to a lower per capita dam capacity compared to countries that prioritize large-scale dam constructions without such constraints.
Chile
In 2001, Chile ranked 52nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 767.786 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's substantial investment in water management and infrastructure, which is critical given Chile's diverse climate and geography, ranging from arid deserts to fertile valleys.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Chile's reliance on hydroelectric power, which accounts for a significant portion of its energy supply. The country's extensive network of rivers and the Andes mountain range provide favorable conditions for dam construction, enabling the government to harness water resources effectively for energy production and irrigation.
Additionally, Chile's focus on sustainable development and water resource management has led to the implementation of various policies aimed at optimizing water usage, which is particularly important in the context of increasing climate variability. In the broader context, Chile is known for its commitment to renewable energy, with hydropower being a key component of its energy mix.
Argentina
In 2001, Argentina ranked 23rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 3,484.96 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric power and water resource management, which are crucial for supporting agriculture, industry, and urban populations.
Factors contributing to Argentina's substantial dam capacity include its diverse topography, abundant water resources from major rivers such as the Paraná and the Colorado, and a historical emphasis on developing renewable energy infrastructure. These developments have enabled the country to harness its water resources effectively, promoting sustainable economic growth.
Furthermore, Argentina benefits from a well-established network of dams, which not only provide water storage for agricultural irrigation but also contribute to flood control and electricity generation. The country's commitment to enhancing its dam infrastructure has positioned it as a regional leader in water management and energy production.
South Africa
In the year 2001, South Africa ranked 57th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant figure of 635.156 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's considerable investment in water infrastructure, which is critical for a nation that faces both droughts and water scarcity in various regions.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to South Africa's extensive system of dams and reservoirs, which are designed to store water for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use. Factors such as the country’s diverse climate and periodic drought conditions necessitate the construction of such water storage facilities to ensure water security for its population.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that South Africa's water management strategies have evolved in response to historical and socio-economic challenges, including the legacy of apartheid, which influenced infrastructure development. As of the early 2000s, the government was also focusing on improving access to water for previously underserved communities, indicating a dual emphasis on capacity and equity in water distribution.
Belize
In 2001, Belize ranked 142nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded capacity of 6.84438 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low per capita dam capacity reflects the country's limited infrastructure in water resource management, which can impact both agricultural productivity and access to clean water.
Several factors contribute to this statistic, including the country's size, geographic characteristics, and economic priorities. Belize, with its diverse ecosystems and abundant rainfall, may not have prioritized extensive dam construction compared to other nations, focusing instead on conservation and tourism. Furthermore, the economic resources available for infrastructure development can significantly influence dam capacity.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that Belize's water supply management relies on both surface water and groundwater sources, emphasizing the importance of sustainable practices to ensure adequate water availability for its population. The low dam capacity per capita may also highlight challenges faced by the country in addressing water scarcity issues, especially during periods of drought.
Kenya
In 2001, Kenya ranked 51st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 783.182 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management capabilities and its reliance on dams for water supply, irrigation, and hydroelectric energy generation.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Kenya's diverse geography, which includes several major rivers and lakes that provide potential for dam construction. Furthermore, the government's focus on infrastructure development and investments in renewable energy sources have facilitated the establishment of multiple dams across the country.
Interestingly, Kenya's reliance on dam infrastructure is also indicative of its broader challenges with water scarcity and the need for efficient water management systems, particularly in agricultural areas where irrigation is critical. The country's focus on enhancing dam capacity is part of a larger strategy aimed at addressing these challenges while promoting sustainable development.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranks 124th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita as of the year 2001. The country has a dam capacity of 46.8812 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively low level of water storage infrastructure when compared to other nations.
This statistic reflects the challenges Sierra Leone faced in developing its water resources, particularly following the civil war that lasted from 1991 to 2002, which severely impacted the country's infrastructure and economic stability. The limited dam capacity per capita can be attributed to factors such as underinvestment in water infrastructure, economic constraints, and a focus on immediate humanitarian needs over long-term development projects.
Furthermore, the low dam capacity impacts not only the availability of water for domestic use but also affects agricultural productivity and energy generation, essential for a country striving for economic recovery and growth. In contrast, countries with higher dam capacities often enjoy better water management and agricultural resilience, illustrating the critical role of infrastructure in national development.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data