Dam capacity per capita 2001

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
26,928.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Iceland flag
Iceland
8,090.07 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Ghana flag
Ghana
7,363.71 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Norway flag
Norway
7,324.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
6,463.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
6,290.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Russia flag
Russia
5,485.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
4,339.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
3,999.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Panama flag
Panama
2,836.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Mali flag
Mali
1,142.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,115.16 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
949.047 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
793.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
North Korea flag
North Korea
749.364 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Portugal flag
Portugal
722.664 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Morocco flag
Morocco
586.414 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
570.609 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Romania flag
Romania
504.673 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
390.156 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Namibia flag
Namibia
381.537 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
269.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Peru flag
Peru
214.089 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
186.654 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
174.198 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
142.585 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
140.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
100.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
83.113 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Poland flag
Poland
72.159 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Libya flag
Libya
72.153 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Philippines flag
Philippines
66.989 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
54.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Oman flag
Oman
32.629 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
28.971 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
16.226 cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Niger flag
Niger
6.994 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Malawi flag
Malawi
3.602 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Nepal flag
Nepal
3.419 cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Maldives flag
Maldives
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Malta flag
Malta
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Suriname flag
Suriname
41,104.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Zambia flag
Zambia
9,794.83 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
8,343.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
6,147.12 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Iraq flag
Iraq
6,024.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,238.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
5,132.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
4,633.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
4,521.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,042.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Australia flag
Australia
4,016.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,941.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Finland flag
Finland
3,585.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,484.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Uganda flag
Uganda
3,232.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
2,960.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
2,610.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
United States flag
United States
2,588.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Turkey flag
Turkey
2,347.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,253.08 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
2,048.74 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
1,409.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Laos flag
Laos
1,284.08 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Spain flag
Spain
1,282.48 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Albania flag
Albania
1,280.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,237.29 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Greece flag
Greece
1,136.38 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
1,062.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,058.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,019.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
967.275 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
961.169 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Honduras flag
Honduras
858.932 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
857.38 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
822.153 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Georgia flag
Georgia
810.973 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Kenya flag
Kenya
783.182 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Chile flag
Chile
767.786 cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
696.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
82
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
649.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
83
South Africa flag
South Africa
635.156 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
590.152 cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
556.569 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
550.239 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
490.071 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
462.679 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Cuba flag
Cuba
451.55 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Armenia flag
Armenia
449.661 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Latvia flag
Latvia
429.799 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
422.776 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
China flag
China
401.371 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Iran flag
Iran
391.664 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
South Korea flag
South Korea
344.362 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Togo flag
Togo
325.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Botswana flag
Botswana
323.378 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
320.982 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
311.212 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
303.158 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
288.246 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Colombia flag
Colombia
274.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Angola flag
Angola
266.923 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
266.439 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Austria flag
Austria
264.566 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
259.59 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Japan flag
Japan
239.542 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
226.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Ireland flag
Ireland
224.956 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Croatia flag
Croatia
223.665 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Guinea flag
Guinea
215.106 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
India flag
India
209.063 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Italy flag
Italy
175.333 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Algeria flag
Algeria
173.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Gabon flag
Gabon
167.992 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
France flag
France
166.618 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Fiji flag
Fiji
156.545 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
135.034 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Belarus flag
Belarus
134.392 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Estonia flag
Estonia
131.468 cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
104.696 cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
99.042 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
57.74 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
54.595 cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
53.917 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
46.881 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
24.479 cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
88.913 cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
80.934 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Liberia flag
Liberia
79.129 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
66.006 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
64.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
49.978 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
47.345 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Germany flag
Germany
41.187 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
38.543 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Haiti flag
Haiti
35.123 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Jordan flag
Jordan
32.628 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Hungary flag
Hungary
25.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Yemen flag
Yemen
20.821 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
19.078 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Singapore flag
Singapore
18.197 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
16.837 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
14.431 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.027 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
11.82 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Belize flag
Belize
6.844 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.732 cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Benin flag
Benin
3.156 cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Congo flag
Congo
2.75 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.077 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.014 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.204 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0.079 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Iceland flagIceland
  3. #3Ghana flagGhana
  4. #4Norway flagNorway
  5. #5Paraguay flagParaguay
  6. #6Nicaragua flagNicaragua
  7. #7Russia flagRussia
  8. #8New Zealand flagNew Zealand
  9. #9Mozambique flagMozambique
  10. #10Panama flagPanama

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Sudan flagSudan
  2. #163State of Palestine flagState of Palestine
  3. #162Somalia flagSomalia
  4. #161Rwanda flagRwanda
  5. #160Papua New Guinea flagPapua New Guinea
  6. #159Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  7. #158Cabo Verde flagCabo Verde
  8. #157Bhutan flagBhutan
  9. #156Bahrain flagBahrain
  10. #155Cambodia flagCambodia

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2001, the metric of dam capacity per capita emerged as a critical indicator of water resource management worldwide. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, reflects the capacity for each individual within a country to access stored water, underscoring its importance in sustainability, agriculture, and community development. As global populations continued to grow, understanding these capacities allowed for strategic planning in water security, especially in the face of increasing environmental changes.

Global Distribution of Dam Capacity

The global distribution of dam capacity per capita in 2001 presented striking contrasts among nations. Suriname stood at the forefront with a staggering 41,104.9 cubic meters per inhabitant, highlighting its abundant water resources relative to its population. This was followed by countries like Canada and Zambia, with capacities of 26,928.6 and 9,794.83 cubic meters per capita, respectively. Such high capacities often correlate with vast geographical expanses and significant investments in hydropower infrastructure.

Conversely, several countries reported negligible or zero dam capacity per capita, including the Maldives, Bhutan, and Malta. These figures point towards various factors such as limited freshwater resources, smaller land areas, or a reliance on alternative water management strategies like desalination or groundwater extraction.

Environmental and Climatic Significance

The environmental implications of dam capacity per capita cannot be overstated. High dam capacities in countries like Iceland and Norway align with their natural abundance of rivers and lakes, which are crucial for hydroelectric power production. These renewable energy sources contribute to the countries' sustainability goals, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing carbon footprints.

In contrast, nations with minimal capacity, such as Bahrain and the State of Palestine, face challenges in securing adequate water supplies for their populations, exacerbating vulnerabilities to climate change. These regions may experience heightened water stress due to diminished rainfall and increasing temperatures, necessitating innovative solutions to water scarcity.

Analyzing regional trends reveals noteworthy disparities in dam capacity distribution. In Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe showcase significant dam capacities, indicative of targeted investments in water storage for agricultural purposes. These investments are critical for enhancing food security and supporting economic growth.

Latin American countries such as Paraguay and Venezuela also report high capacities, reflecting large-scale projects in hydroelectric power generation and irrigation. These initiatives are pivotal in industrial development and supporting rural communities, illustrating the integral role of water management in regional stability.

Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications

The year 2001 saw varied changes in dam capacity per capita across different nations. Eswatini marked the most significant increase, with a 129.1% rise, indicating substantial improvements in water infrastructure. This growth is vital for supporting the nation's agricultural and industrial sectors, fostering economic resilience.

Conversely, Suriname experienced a 2.0% decrease in capacity, attributed to a combination of population growth and potential infrastructure deterioration. Such declines underscore the need for continuous maintenance and investment in water storage facilities to sustain development goals.

Policy Implications and Future Directions

The measurement of dam capacity per capita in 2001 highlights critical policy implications for nations worldwide. Countries with low capacities are urged to enhance their water management strategies, focusing on sustainable practices and technology-driven solutions. Investments in infrastructure, such as dam rehabilitation and expansion, are essential to meet future demands.

International cooperation and knowledge exchange play a crucial role in addressing global water challenges. By sharing expertise and resources, countries can develop innovative approaches to maximize water availability, ensuring equitable access for all and contributing to global water security goals.

In summary, the data on dam capacity per capita in 2001 provides valuable insights into the worldwide landscape of water resource management. Understanding these patterns is vital for fostering sustainable development, safeguarding against environmental risks, and ensuring the well-being of populations globally. As we move forward, continued focus on this metric will aid in navigating the complex challenges of water security in the 21st century.

Insights by country

1

Maldives

In 2001, the Maldives ranked 156th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant reliance on rainfall and groundwater resources rather than large-scale dam infrastructure for water supply and management.

The Maldives, an archipelago composed of 26 atolls, faces unique geographical challenges that contribute to this low dam capacity. The nation's topography, characterized by low elevation and limited land area, restricts the feasibility and necessity for large dams, which are more common in larger landlocked countries.

Furthermore, the absence of substantial freshwater reservoirs necessitates a focus on alternative water management strategies, such as rainwater harvesting and desalination. This reliance is further compounded by the Maldives' vulnerability to climate change, which poses risks to freshwater availability and necessitates adaptive water management practices.

2

Cameroon

In 2001, Cameroon ranked 42nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a capacity of 1019.67 cubic meters per inhabitant. This substantial figure reflects the country's investment in hydroelectric power and water resource management, which are crucial for supporting its growing population and agricultural needs.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Cameroon's diverse topography, which includes significant river systems such as the Sanaga and Wouri rivers, enabling the construction of various dams for energy generation and irrigation. Additionally, the government has emphasized infrastructure development to harness these water resources effectively.

Interestingly, Cameroon’s dam capacity is part of a broader strategy to promote sustainable energy and mitigate the impacts of climate change, as hydropower accounts for a significant portion of the nation’s electricity generation. This focus on renewable energy sources is vital for the country's economic development and energy security.

3

Lesotho

In the year 2001, Lesotho ranked 32nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a significant capacity of 1409.6 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high per capita dam capacity reflects the country's extensive investment in water infrastructure, largely due to its mountainous terrain and the need for efficient water management.

The substantial dam capacity in Lesotho is influenced by its geographical features, which include numerous rivers and high-altitude regions conducive to water collection and storage. The country relies heavily on hydropower for electricity generation, with dams playing a critical role in supporting both domestic and regional energy needs.

Interestingly, Lesotho's water resources are not only vital for its own population but also contribute to the water supply for neighboring South Africa, highlighting the interconnectedness of water management in the region. The reliance on dam infrastructure underscores the importance of sustainable water resource management in addressing both current and future demands.

4

Germany

In the year 2001, Germany ranked 125th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 41.1874 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s extensive network of dams that support various functions, including hydroelectric power generation, irrigation, and flood control.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Germany's advanced infrastructure and efficient water management systems, which may reduce the reliance on large dam projects compared to other nations. Additionally, Germany's commitment to renewable energy sources has led to a diversification of its energy portfolio, which includes a focus on wind and solar power.

As a part of its water resource management, Germany has implemented stringent environmental regulations that govern the construction and operation of dams, ensuring sustainable practices. This regulatory environment may contribute to a lower per capita dam capacity compared to countries that prioritize large-scale dam constructions without such constraints.

5

Chile

In 2001, Chile ranked 52nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 767.786 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's substantial investment in water management and infrastructure, which is critical given Chile's diverse climate and geography, ranging from arid deserts to fertile valleys.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Chile's reliance on hydroelectric power, which accounts for a significant portion of its energy supply. The country's extensive network of rivers and the Andes mountain range provide favorable conditions for dam construction, enabling the government to harness water resources effectively for energy production and irrigation.

Additionally, Chile's focus on sustainable development and water resource management has led to the implementation of various policies aimed at optimizing water usage, which is particularly important in the context of increasing climate variability. In the broader context, Chile is known for its commitment to renewable energy, with hydropower being a key component of its energy mix.

6

Argentina

In 2001, Argentina ranked 23rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 3,484.96 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric power and water resource management, which are crucial for supporting agriculture, industry, and urban populations.

Factors contributing to Argentina's substantial dam capacity include its diverse topography, abundant water resources from major rivers such as the Paraná and the Colorado, and a historical emphasis on developing renewable energy infrastructure. These developments have enabled the country to harness its water resources effectively, promoting sustainable economic growth.

Furthermore, Argentina benefits from a well-established network of dams, which not only provide water storage for agricultural irrigation but also contribute to flood control and electricity generation. The country's commitment to enhancing its dam infrastructure has positioned it as a regional leader in water management and energy production.

7

South Africa

In the year 2001, South Africa ranked 57th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant figure of 635.156 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's considerable investment in water infrastructure, which is critical for a nation that faces both droughts and water scarcity in various regions.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to South Africa's extensive system of dams and reservoirs, which are designed to store water for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use. Factors such as the country’s diverse climate and periodic drought conditions necessitate the construction of such water storage facilities to ensure water security for its population.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that South Africa's water management strategies have evolved in response to historical and socio-economic challenges, including the legacy of apartheid, which influenced infrastructure development. As of the early 2000s, the government was also focusing on improving access to water for previously underserved communities, indicating a dual emphasis on capacity and equity in water distribution.

8

Belize

In 2001, Belize ranked 142nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded capacity of 6.84438 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low per capita dam capacity reflects the country's limited infrastructure in water resource management, which can impact both agricultural productivity and access to clean water.

Several factors contribute to this statistic, including the country's size, geographic characteristics, and economic priorities. Belize, with its diverse ecosystems and abundant rainfall, may not have prioritized extensive dam construction compared to other nations, focusing instead on conservation and tourism. Furthermore, the economic resources available for infrastructure development can significantly influence dam capacity.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that Belize's water supply management relies on both surface water and groundwater sources, emphasizing the importance of sustainable practices to ensure adequate water availability for its population. The low dam capacity per capita may also highlight challenges faced by the country in addressing water scarcity issues, especially during periods of drought.

9

Kenya

In 2001, Kenya ranked 51st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 783.182 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management capabilities and its reliance on dams for water supply, irrigation, and hydroelectric energy generation.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Kenya's diverse geography, which includes several major rivers and lakes that provide potential for dam construction. Furthermore, the government's focus on infrastructure development and investments in renewable energy sources have facilitated the establishment of multiple dams across the country.

Interestingly, Kenya's reliance on dam infrastructure is also indicative of its broader challenges with water scarcity and the need for efficient water management systems, particularly in agricultural areas where irrigation is critical. The country's focus on enhancing dam capacity is part of a larger strategy aimed at addressing these challenges while promoting sustainable development.

10

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone ranks 124th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita as of the year 2001. The country has a dam capacity of 46.8812 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively low level of water storage infrastructure when compared to other nations.

This statistic reflects the challenges Sierra Leone faced in developing its water resources, particularly following the civil war that lasted from 1991 to 2002, which severely impacted the country's infrastructure and economic stability. The limited dam capacity per capita can be attributed to factors such as underinvestment in water infrastructure, economic constraints, and a focus on immediate humanitarian needs over long-term development projects.

Furthermore, the low dam capacity impacts not only the availability of water for domestic use but also affects agricultural productivity and energy generation, essential for a country striving for economic recovery and growth. In contrast, countries with higher dam capacities often enjoy better water management and agricultural resilience, illustrating the critical role of infrastructure in national development.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts