Dam capacity per capita 1996

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
28,225.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Iceland flag
Iceland
8,574.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Ghana flag
Ghana
8,338.17 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Iraq flag
Iraq
7,060.03 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
6,766.52 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Norway flag
Norway
6,658.75 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Russia flag
Russia
5,412.74 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
4,912.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
4,528.29 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
4,495.17 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Panama flag
Panama
3,131.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Mali flag
Mali
1,308.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,207.39 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
1,070.87 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
814.836 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
North Korea flag
North Korea
779.462 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Portugal flag
Portugal
731.889 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
590.408 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Morocco flag
Morocco
575.143 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Romania flag
Romania
490.748 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
445.366 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Namibia flag
Namibia
430.431 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
256.971 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Peru flag
Peru
231.212 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
212.027 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
200.24 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
143.585 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
137.567 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
105.777 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
88.151 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Libya flag
Libya
78.175 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Philippines flag
Philippines
75.537 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Poland flag
Poland
65.327 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
57.464 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Oman flag
Oman
34.948 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
34.007 cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
17.283 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Niger flag
Niger
8.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Malawi flag
Malawi
4.033 cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Nepal flag
Nepal
3.751 cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Maldives flag
Maldives
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Malta flag
Malta
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Suriname flag
Suriname
45,575.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Zambia flag
Zambia
11,232 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
8,952.03 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
6,766.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,349.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
4,913.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
4,870.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
4,775.39 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Australia flag
Australia
4,249.39 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,067.61 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Uganda flag
Uganda
3,767.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,680.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,663.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Finland flag
Finland
3,630.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
3,367.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
2,730.74 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
United States flag
United States
2,711.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,509.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
2,411.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Turkey flag
Turkey
2,261.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Laos flag
Laos
1,401.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,296.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Spain flag
Spain
1,293.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Albania flag
Albania
1,241.65 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
1,165.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,163.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Greece flag
Greece
1,114.28 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,063.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Honduras flag
Honduras
983.178 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
921.405 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
921.202 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
919.172 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Kenya flag
Kenya
905.514 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Chile flag
Chile
800.285 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
786.164 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
751.539 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Georgia flag
Georgia
709.341 cubic meters per inhabitant
81
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
668.184 cubic meters per inhabitant
82
South Africa flag
South Africa
658.672 cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
640.871 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
563.257 cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
539.835 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
472.788 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
466.828 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Cuba flag
Cuba
459.052 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
441.283 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Armenia flag
Armenia
423.002 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Latvia flag
Latvia
408.885 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
China flag
China
386.631 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Togo flag
Togo
375.169 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
South Korea flag
South Korea
354.962 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
331.862 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
318.662 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Angola flag
Angola
315.448 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
310.813 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Iran flag
Iran
300.353 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Botswana flag
Botswana
295.397 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
288.147 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
284.751 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Austria flag
Austria
267.268 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
255.587 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Colombia flag
Colombia
242.169 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Ireland flag
Ireland
238.834 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
235.807 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Japan flag
Japan
235.214 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
222.623 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
India flag
India
217.94 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Croatia flag
Croatia
210.859 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Gabon flag
Gabon
190.97 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
France flag
France
170.726 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Fiji flag
Fiji
165.466 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Italy flag
Italy
162.688 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Algeria flag
Algeria
162.668 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
150.911 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Belarus flag
Belarus
131.405 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Estonia flag
Estonia
127.209 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
113.099 cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Liberia flag
Liberia
106.886 cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
102.263 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
94.251 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
56.795 cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
54.938 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
52.391 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
44.708 cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Senegal flag
Senegal
27.573 cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
90.423 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
72.128 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
69.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
54.526 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
51.873 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
43.575 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Germany flag
Germany
41.023 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Haiti flag
Haiti
38.534 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Guinea flag
Guinea
30.502 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.888 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Yemen flag
Yemen
23.574 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
20.724 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Jordan flag
Jordan
20.682 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Singapore flag
Singapore
20.439 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
16.861 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
15.769 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.677 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Belize flag
Belize
8.083 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Benin flag
Benin
3.677 cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Congo flag
Congo
3.184 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.159 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.167 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.21 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0.093 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Iceland flagIceland
  3. #3Ghana flagGhana
  4. #4Iraq flagIraq
  5. #5Nicaragua flagNicaragua
  6. #6Norway flagNorway
  7. #7Russia flagRussia
  8. #8Paraguay flagParaguay
  9. #9New Zealand flagNew Zealand
  10. #10Mozambique flagMozambique

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Sudan flagSudan
  2. #163State of Palestine flagState of Palestine
  3. #162Somalia flagSomalia
  4. #161Rwanda flagRwanda
  5. #160Papua New Guinea flagPapua New Guinea
  6. #159Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  7. #158Cabo Verde flagCabo Verde
  8. #157Bhutan flagBhutan
  9. #156Bahrain flagBahrain
  10. #155Cambodia flagCambodia

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1996, the global landscape of dam capacity per capita presented a fascinating picture of water resource management across different nations. This metric, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, serves as a barometer for understanding how countries manage their water resources, impacting their sustainability and development. With growing concerns about water security and its vital role in agriculture and industry, analyzing dam capacity per capita provides crucial insights into global environmental and geographic patterns.

Geographic Distribution and Patterns

The distribution of dam capacity per capita in 1996 reveals substantial geographic variability, highlighting disparities in water resource management. Suriname emerged as the leader with a staggering 45,575.7 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity underscores its abundant freshwater resources, largely due to its small population and extensive river systems. Canada followed with 28,225.7 cubic meters, benefiting similarly from vast water bodies relative to its population size. In stark contrast, several countries, including Papua New Guinea, Maldives, and Rwanda, reported near-zero dam capacity per capita, reflecting limited infrastructure and potentially greater challenges in managing water resources.

Sustainability and Development Implications

Examining dam capacity per capita offers critical insights into a nation’s approach to sustainable development. Countries with higher per capita capacities, like Zambia (11,232) and Zimbabwe (8,952.03), demonstrate a robust commitment to maintaining water security, which in turn supports agricultural productivity and industrial growth. Such capacities are often indicative of forward-thinking policies and investments in water infrastructure, aligning with broader sustainable development goals. Conversely, nations with lower capacities may face constraints in agricultural output and economic development, underscoring the need for international cooperation and investment in water management technologies.

Year-Over-Year Dynamics and Changes

The year-over-year changes in dam capacity per capita in 1996 provide a nuanced view of the evolving dynamics in water resource management. Notably, Morocco experienced a significant increase of 138.83 cubic meters per capita, reflecting substantial infrastructure development and a strategic focus on enhancing water storage capacity. In contrast, Suriname saw a decrease of 978.60 cubic meters per capita, a 2.1% decline, indicating potential challenges in maintaining its previous levels of water capacity. This fluctuation highlights the sensitive balance between natural resource availability and infrastructural developments.

Climate and Environmental Factors

The interplay between climate conditions and dam capacity per capita cannot be overstated. Countries like Iceland (8,574.14) benefit from abundant rainfall and extensive glacial meltwater, which naturally enhances their water storage capabilities. Conversely, nations with arid climates or those prone to droughts may struggle to maintain sufficient dam capacities, affecting their water security and resilience against climate change. These environmental conditions necessitate adaptive management strategies to ensure sustainable water availability for future generations.

Regional Clustering and Implications

Analyzing regional clustering of dam capacity per capita reveals interesting patterns and implications for policy-making. North America and parts of Africa exhibit higher capacities, suggesting successful integration of natural water resources with man-made infrastructure. This regional clustering has implications for water policy, as countries with similar geographical and climatic conditions can share best practices and collaborate on transboundary water management strategies. Additionally, regional disparities highlight the need for targeted investments and international aid to support countries with lower capacities in enhancing their water resource management capabilities.

Overall, the 1996 global statistics on dam capacity per capita underscore the importance of strategic water resource management in achieving sustainable development goals. With water security being a critical issue worldwide, understanding these patterns offers valuable insights into the relationship between geographic conditions, infrastructural development, and environmental sustainability.

Insights by country

1

Oman

In 1996, Oman ranked 127th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 34.9479 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage water resources in an arid climate, where freshwater availability is limited and demand is high due to agricultural and domestic needs.

Several factors contribute to Oman's dam capacity per capita, including its geographical landscape, which features mountain ranges that facilitate the construction of reservoirs. Additionally, government initiatives aimed at improving water storage infrastructure have led to an increase in dam construction, aimed at enhancing water security amid growing population pressures and climate variability.

Interestingly, Oman's challenges with water scarcity are not unique; many Middle Eastern countries face similar issues. As a result, Oman has invested in various water conservation strategies, including desalination and the promotion of water-efficient agricultural practices, to ensure sustainable water management for its population.

2

Burkina Faso

In 1996, Burkina Faso ranked 64th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 466.828 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to harness water resources for agricultural and domestic use, which are critical in a region that faces significant climatic challenges.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the government's investment in water infrastructure to support irrigation and mitigate the effects of drought. Additionally, Burkina Faso's reliance on agriculture as the backbone of its economy has driven the development of dams to ensure water availability for farming.

Interesting to note, Burkina Faso is located in a semi-arid region, which makes water management a crucial aspect of its development strategy. The focus on enhancing water storage facilities aligns with broader goals to improve food security and sustain livelihoods in a country where agriculture employs over 80% of the workforce.

3

Eritrea

Eritrea ranked 133rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1996, with a capacity of 20.7239 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low figure reflects the country's limited infrastructure and investment in water management systems during that period.

The capacity of dams is crucial for managing water resources, particularly in arid regions, and can significantly impact agricultural productivity and access to clean water. In Eritrea, the challenges of water management are compounded by its geography and climatic conditions, which can lead to water scarcity.

Factors contributing to Eritrea's dam capacity per capita include the nation's historical context, including the impact of prolonged conflict and economic challenges that hindered development projects. Additionally, the government has focused on other priorities, which may have delayed investment in essential water infrastructure.

4

Albania

In 1996, Albania held the 36th position out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1241.65 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects Albania's significant investment in hydroelectric power, which is a crucial part of the country's energy portfolio, providing around 90% of its electricity needs.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Albania's mountainous terrain, which is conducive to the construction of dams and hydroelectric facilities. Additionally, the country has abundant water resources, particularly from rivers such as the Drin and Vjosa, enabling the development of large-scale hydropower projects.

Interestingly, Albania's reliance on hydropower has both advantages and challenges. While it allows for relatively low-cost electricity production, the dependence on hydropower also makes the country vulnerable to fluctuations in water availability due to climate change and seasonal variations. This dynamic illustrates the complexities of managing natural resources in a rapidly changing environmental landscape.

5

Honduras

In 1996, Honduras ranked 43rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 983.178 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which has been crucial for meeting the energy demands of its growing population.

The availability of water resources in Honduras, combined with its mountainous terrain, has facilitated the development of numerous dams. These projects not only contribute to the generation of electricity but also play a vital role in irrigation and flood control. The capacity per capita is indicative of the country's ability to harness its natural resources for sustainable development.

Factors contributing to this relatively high dam capacity include government initiatives aimed at enhancing energy independence and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Moreover, Honduras has historically faced challenges such as energy shortages, which have prompted the expansion of hydroelectric projects. As a result, the nation has made strides in improving its energy infrastructure, making it vital for economic growth and development.

6

Sao Tome and Principe

Sao Tome and Principe ranked 81st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1996. The country had a dam capacity of 284.751 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively significant water resource management capability per person in comparison to many other nations.

This statistic reflects the island nation's efforts to harness its natural resources, particularly in the context of its geographical features, which include numerous rivers and a tropical climate conducive to hydroelectric power generation. The capacity per capita can be attributed to the country's limited but strategic investments in water infrastructure, aimed at supporting both domestic needs and agricultural irrigation.

Moreover, the presence of a high dam capacity per capita can also be linked to the country's unique ecological setting, which necessitates effective water management practices to mitigate the impacts of seasonal rainfall variability. As a small island nation, Sao Tome and Principe's focus on sustainable water resource management is crucial for ensuring long-term resilience against climate change and supporting its economic development.

7

Mozambique

Mozambique ranks 18th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita as of 1996. The dam capacity per capita in Mozambique was recorded at 4,495.17 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting significant investment in water resource management and infrastructure development during the post-independence era.

This high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the country's extensive river systems, including the Zambezi and Limpopo rivers, which provide substantial opportunities for hydroelectric power generation and irrigation. Furthermore, the government’s efforts to harness these water resources have played a crucial role in supporting agricultural productivity and energy supply, essential for economic development.

Additionally, Mozambique's favorable ranking in dam capacity may also highlight the importance of water management in addressing challenges such as drought and food security, which are critical in a country where agriculture is a vital part of the economy. The statistic underscores Mozambique’s potential in utilizing its water resources for sustainable development.

8

El Salvador

In 1996, El Salvador ranked 55th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 668.184 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure and ability to manage water resources, which is crucial for both agricultural and urban needs.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to El Salvador's geographic characteristics, which include numerous rivers and a climate that supports significant rainfall, allowing for the construction of reservoirs to harness water. However, challenges such as frequent natural disasters, particularly earthquakes and hurricanes, have historically affected infrastructure development and maintenance.

Moreover, water resource management remains a critical issue in El Salvador, where factors such as population growth, urbanization, and climate change exert increasing pressure on available water supplies. In a broader context, the country has been working towards improving its water management systems to ensure sustainability and resilience against environmental impacts.

9

Belarus

In 1996, Belarus had a dam capacity per capita of 131.405 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 103rd out of 164 countries in this regard. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure for water management and its ability to harness and store water resources effectively.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Belarus's geographical features, which include numerous rivers and lakes, along with a focus on hydropower as a significant energy source. The country has invested in its hydropower capabilities, which has implications for energy production and environmental management.

As of the mid-1990s, Belarus was transitioning from a centrally planned economy to a more market-oriented system, which also impacted infrastructure development. This period of change may have influenced the overall investment in water resource management and the development of dams.

10

Congo

Congo ranked 147th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1996. The country had a dam capacity of approximately 3.18383 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population size.

This relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including insufficient investment in hydropower and water resource management, underdeveloped infrastructure, and economic challenges faced during the post-colonial era. These issues have hindered the country's ability to harness its significant water resources effectively.

In comparison, countries with higher dam capacities often benefit from more advanced engineering, investment in renewable energy, and government policies that prioritize infrastructure development. Enhancing dam capacity is crucial for Congo to improve energy access and water management, which are vital for economic growth and sustainable development.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts