Dam capacity per capita 1996
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 28,225.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Iceland | 8,574.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Ghana | 8,338.17 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Iraq | 7,060.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Nicaragua | 6,766.52 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Norway | 6,658.75 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Russia | 5,412.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Paraguay | 4,912.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | New Zealand | 4,528.29 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Mozambique | 4,495.17 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Panama | 3,131.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Mali | 1,308.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Mexico | 1,207.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Malaysia | 1,070.87 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | North Macedonia | 814.836 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | North Korea | 779.462 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Portugal | 731.889 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Netherlands | 590.408 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Morocco | 575.143 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Romania | 490.748 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Nigeria | 445.366 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Namibia | 430.431 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Republic of Moldova | 256.971 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Peru | 231.212 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Mauritania | 212.027 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Pakistan | 200.24 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Luxembourg | 143.585 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Lithuania | 137.567 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Mongolia | 105.777 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Myanmar | 88.151 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Libya | 78.175 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Philippines | 75.537 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Poland | 65.327 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Mauritius | 57.464 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Oman | 34.948 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Madagascar | 34.007 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Saint Lucia | 17.283 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Niger | 8.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Malawi | 4.033 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Nepal | 3.751 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Malta | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Suriname | 45,575.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Zambia | 11,232 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Zimbabwe | 8,952.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Venezuela | 6,766.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Uruguay | 5,349.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,913.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Kazakhstan | 4,870.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Tajikistan | 4,775.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Australia | 4,249.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Sweden | 4,067.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Uganda | 3,767.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Argentina | 3,680.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Brazil | 3,663.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Finland | 3,630.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Tanzania | 3,367.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Azerbaijan | 2,730.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | United States | 2,711.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Egypt | 2,509.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2,411.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Turkey | 2,261.46 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Laos | 1,401.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Thailand | 1,296.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Spain | 1,293.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Albania | 1,241.65 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Turkmenistan | 1,165.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Cameroon | 1,163.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Greece | 1,114.28 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Guyana | 1,063.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Honduras | 983.178 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Ukraine | 921.405 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Uzbekistan | 921.202 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Syrian Arab Republic | 919.172 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Kenya | 905.514 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Chile | 800.285 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Bulgaria | 786.164 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 751.539 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Georgia | 709.341 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | El Salvador | 668.184 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | South Africa | 658.672 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Ecuador | 640.871 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Vietnam | 563.257 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Costa Rica | 539.835 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Switzerland | 472.788 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Burkina Faso | 466.828 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Cuba | 459.052 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Lesotho | 441.283 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Armenia | 423.002 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Latvia | 408.885 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | China | 386.631 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Togo | 375.169 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | South Korea | 354.962 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Sri Lanka | 331.862 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Slovakia | 318.662 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Angola | 315.448 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Cyprus | 310.813 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Iran | 300.353 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Botswana | 295.397 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Czech Republic | 288.147 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Sao Tome and Principe | 284.751 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Austria | 267.268 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Eswatini | 255.587 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Colombia | 242.169 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Ireland | 238.834 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Dominican Republic | 235.807 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Japan | 235.214 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Tunisia | 222.623 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | India | 217.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Croatia | 210.859 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Gabon | 190.97 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | France | 170.726 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Fiji | 165.466 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Italy | 162.688 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Algeria | 162.668 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Brunei Darussalam | 150.911 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Belarus | 131.405 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Estonia | 127.209 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Afghanistan | 113.099 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Liberia | 106.886 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Indonesia | 102.263 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Ethiopia | 94.251 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | 56.795 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Trinidad and Tobago | 54.938 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Sierra Leone | 52.391 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Saudi Arabia | 44.708 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Senegal | 27.573 cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | United Kingdom | 90.423 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Antigua and Barbuda | 72.128 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Bolivia | 69.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Lebanon | 54.526 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Bangladesh | 51.873 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Guatemala | 43.575 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Germany | 41.023 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Haiti | 38.534 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Guinea | 30.502 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Hungary | 24.888 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Yemen | 23.574 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Eritrea | 20.724 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Jordan | 20.682 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Singapore | 20.439 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Slovenia | 16.861 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | United Arab Emirates | 15.769 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Belgium | 14.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 12.677 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Belize | 8.083 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Denmark | 3.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Benin | 3.677 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo | 3.184 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Jamaica | 2.159 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.167 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Grenada | 0.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Cambodia | 0.093 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Bahrain | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Guinea-Bissau
- #158
Cabo Verde
- #157
Bhutan
- #156
Bahrain
- #155
Cambodia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1996, the global landscape of dam capacity per capita presented a fascinating picture of water resource management across different nations. This metric, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, serves as a barometer for understanding how countries manage their water resources, impacting their sustainability and development. With growing concerns about water security and its vital role in agriculture and industry, analyzing dam capacity per capita provides crucial insights into global environmental and geographic patterns.
Geographic Distribution and Patterns
The distribution of dam capacity per capita in 1996 reveals substantial geographic variability, highlighting disparities in water resource management. Suriname emerged as the leader with a staggering 45,575.7 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity underscores its abundant freshwater resources, largely due to its small population and extensive river systems. Canada followed with 28,225.7 cubic meters, benefiting similarly from vast water bodies relative to its population size. In stark contrast, several countries, including Papua New Guinea, Maldives, and Rwanda, reported near-zero dam capacity per capita, reflecting limited infrastructure and potentially greater challenges in managing water resources.
Sustainability and Development Implications
Examining dam capacity per capita offers critical insights into a nation’s approach to sustainable development. Countries with higher per capita capacities, like Zambia (11,232) and Zimbabwe (8,952.03), demonstrate a robust commitment to maintaining water security, which in turn supports agricultural productivity and industrial growth. Such capacities are often indicative of forward-thinking policies and investments in water infrastructure, aligning with broader sustainable development goals. Conversely, nations with lower capacities may face constraints in agricultural output and economic development, underscoring the need for international cooperation and investment in water management technologies.
Year-Over-Year Dynamics and Changes
The year-over-year changes in dam capacity per capita in 1996 provide a nuanced view of the evolving dynamics in water resource management. Notably, Morocco experienced a significant increase of 138.83 cubic meters per capita, reflecting substantial infrastructure development and a strategic focus on enhancing water storage capacity. In contrast, Suriname saw a decrease of 978.60 cubic meters per capita, a 2.1% decline, indicating potential challenges in maintaining its previous levels of water capacity. This fluctuation highlights the sensitive balance between natural resource availability and infrastructural developments.
Climate and Environmental Factors
The interplay between climate conditions and dam capacity per capita cannot be overstated. Countries like Iceland (8,574.14) benefit from abundant rainfall and extensive glacial meltwater, which naturally enhances their water storage capabilities. Conversely, nations with arid climates or those prone to droughts may struggle to maintain sufficient dam capacities, affecting their water security and resilience against climate change. These environmental conditions necessitate adaptive management strategies to ensure sustainable water availability for future generations.
Regional Clustering and Implications
Analyzing regional clustering of dam capacity per capita reveals interesting patterns and implications for policy-making. North America and parts of Africa exhibit higher capacities, suggesting successful integration of natural water resources with man-made infrastructure. This regional clustering has implications for water policy, as countries with similar geographical and climatic conditions can share best practices and collaborate on transboundary water management strategies. Additionally, regional disparities highlight the need for targeted investments and international aid to support countries with lower capacities in enhancing their water resource management capabilities.
Overall, the 1996 global statistics on dam capacity per capita underscore the importance of strategic water resource management in achieving sustainable development goals. With water security being a critical issue worldwide, understanding these patterns offers valuable insights into the relationship between geographic conditions, infrastructural development, and environmental sustainability.
Insights by country
Oman
In 1996, Oman ranked 127th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 34.9479 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage water resources in an arid climate, where freshwater availability is limited and demand is high due to agricultural and domestic needs.
Several factors contribute to Oman's dam capacity per capita, including its geographical landscape, which features mountain ranges that facilitate the construction of reservoirs. Additionally, government initiatives aimed at improving water storage infrastructure have led to an increase in dam construction, aimed at enhancing water security amid growing population pressures and climate variability.
Interestingly, Oman's challenges with water scarcity are not unique; many Middle Eastern countries face similar issues. As a result, Oman has invested in various water conservation strategies, including desalination and the promotion of water-efficient agricultural practices, to ensure sustainable water management for its population.
Burkina Faso
In 1996, Burkina Faso ranked 64th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 466.828 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to harness water resources for agricultural and domestic use, which are critical in a region that faces significant climatic challenges.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the government's investment in water infrastructure to support irrigation and mitigate the effects of drought. Additionally, Burkina Faso's reliance on agriculture as the backbone of its economy has driven the development of dams to ensure water availability for farming.
Interesting to note, Burkina Faso is located in a semi-arid region, which makes water management a crucial aspect of its development strategy. The focus on enhancing water storage facilities aligns with broader goals to improve food security and sustain livelihoods in a country where agriculture employs over 80% of the workforce.
Eritrea
Eritrea ranked 133rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1996, with a capacity of 20.7239 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low figure reflects the country's limited infrastructure and investment in water management systems during that period.
The capacity of dams is crucial for managing water resources, particularly in arid regions, and can significantly impact agricultural productivity and access to clean water. In Eritrea, the challenges of water management are compounded by its geography and climatic conditions, which can lead to water scarcity.
Factors contributing to Eritrea's dam capacity per capita include the nation's historical context, including the impact of prolonged conflict and economic challenges that hindered development projects. Additionally, the government has focused on other priorities, which may have delayed investment in essential water infrastructure.
Albania
In 1996, Albania held the 36th position out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1241.65 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects Albania's significant investment in hydroelectric power, which is a crucial part of the country's energy portfolio, providing around 90% of its electricity needs.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Albania's mountainous terrain, which is conducive to the construction of dams and hydroelectric facilities. Additionally, the country has abundant water resources, particularly from rivers such as the Drin and Vjosa, enabling the development of large-scale hydropower projects.
Interestingly, Albania's reliance on hydropower has both advantages and challenges. While it allows for relatively low-cost electricity production, the dependence on hydropower also makes the country vulnerable to fluctuations in water availability due to climate change and seasonal variations. This dynamic illustrates the complexities of managing natural resources in a rapidly changing environmental landscape.
Honduras
In 1996, Honduras ranked 43rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 983.178 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which has been crucial for meeting the energy demands of its growing population.
The availability of water resources in Honduras, combined with its mountainous terrain, has facilitated the development of numerous dams. These projects not only contribute to the generation of electricity but also play a vital role in irrigation and flood control. The capacity per capita is indicative of the country's ability to harness its natural resources for sustainable development.
Factors contributing to this relatively high dam capacity include government initiatives aimed at enhancing energy independence and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Moreover, Honduras has historically faced challenges such as energy shortages, which have prompted the expansion of hydroelectric projects. As a result, the nation has made strides in improving its energy infrastructure, making it vital for economic growth and development.
Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe ranked 81st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1996. The country had a dam capacity of 284.751 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively significant water resource management capability per person in comparison to many other nations.
This statistic reflects the island nation's efforts to harness its natural resources, particularly in the context of its geographical features, which include numerous rivers and a tropical climate conducive to hydroelectric power generation. The capacity per capita can be attributed to the country's limited but strategic investments in water infrastructure, aimed at supporting both domestic needs and agricultural irrigation.
Moreover, the presence of a high dam capacity per capita can also be linked to the country's unique ecological setting, which necessitates effective water management practices to mitigate the impacts of seasonal rainfall variability. As a small island nation, Sao Tome and Principe's focus on sustainable water resource management is crucial for ensuring long-term resilience against climate change and supporting its economic development.
Mozambique
Mozambique ranks 18th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita as of 1996. The dam capacity per capita in Mozambique was recorded at 4,495.17 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting significant investment in water resource management and infrastructure development during the post-independence era.
This high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the country's extensive river systems, including the Zambezi and Limpopo rivers, which provide substantial opportunities for hydroelectric power generation and irrigation. Furthermore, the government’s efforts to harness these water resources have played a crucial role in supporting agricultural productivity and energy supply, essential for economic development.
Additionally, Mozambique's favorable ranking in dam capacity may also highlight the importance of water management in addressing challenges such as drought and food security, which are critical in a country where agriculture is a vital part of the economy. The statistic underscores Mozambique’s potential in utilizing its water resources for sustainable development.
El Salvador
In 1996, El Salvador ranked 55th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 668.184 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure and ability to manage water resources, which is crucial for both agricultural and urban needs.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to El Salvador's geographic characteristics, which include numerous rivers and a climate that supports significant rainfall, allowing for the construction of reservoirs to harness water. However, challenges such as frequent natural disasters, particularly earthquakes and hurricanes, have historically affected infrastructure development and maintenance.
Moreover, water resource management remains a critical issue in El Salvador, where factors such as population growth, urbanization, and climate change exert increasing pressure on available water supplies. In a broader context, the country has been working towards improving its water management systems to ensure sustainability and resilience against environmental impacts.
Belarus
In 1996, Belarus had a dam capacity per capita of 131.405 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 103rd out of 164 countries in this regard. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure for water management and its ability to harness and store water resources effectively.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Belarus's geographical features, which include numerous rivers and lakes, along with a focus on hydropower as a significant energy source. The country has invested in its hydropower capabilities, which has implications for energy production and environmental management.
As of the mid-1990s, Belarus was transitioning from a centrally planned economy to a more market-oriented system, which also impacted infrastructure development. This period of change may have influenced the overall investment in water resource management and the development of dams.
Congo
Congo ranked 147th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1996. The country had a dam capacity of approximately 3.18383 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population size.
This relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including insufficient investment in hydropower and water resource management, underdeveloped infrastructure, and economic challenges faced during the post-colonial era. These issues have hindered the country's ability to harness its significant water resources effectively.
In comparison, countries with higher dam capacities often benefit from more advanced engineering, investment in renewable energy, and government policies that prioritize infrastructure development. Enhancing dam capacity is crucial for Congo to improve energy access and water management, which are vital for economic growth and sustainable development.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data