Dam capacity per capita 1969

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
2,163.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
366.022 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
296.942 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
182.348 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Albania flag
Albania
178.666 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Austria flag
Austria
177.547 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Algeria flag
Algeria
132.662 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
78.676 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Angola flag
Angola
32.202 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
96.249 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Canada flag
Canada
23,832.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,582.86 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Chile flag
Chile
914.279 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Botswana flag
Botswana
374.404 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
342.445 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
China flag
China
233.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
192.037 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Colombia flag
Colombia
179.133 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Cuba flag
Cuba
75.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
62.311 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
45.784 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
40.904 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
20.623 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Congo flag
Congo
6.268 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Denmark flag
Denmark
4.088 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
3.765 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.679 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1.046 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
368.798 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Egypt flag
Egypt
183.273 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
117.081 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
17.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ghana flag
Ghana
17,040.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
10,751.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Finland flag
Finland
3,489.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,831.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
880.892 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Greece flag
Greece
755.681 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Iran flag
Iran
332.887 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Ireland flag
Ireland
295.503 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Guyana flag
Guyana
263.697 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
India flag
India
201.874 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Liberia flag
Liberia
166.899 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
France flag
France
149.007 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Italy flag
Italy
94.821 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
94.495 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Japan flag
Japan
93.51 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Haiti flag
Haiti
65.284 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Guinea flag
Guinea
56.451 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
49.679 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Germany flag
Germany
33.194 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Honduras flag
Honduras
4.94 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Jordan flag
Jordan
4.48 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.938 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Hungary flag
Hungary
1.313 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.135 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
0.103 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.061 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Iceland flag
Iceland
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Laos flag
Laos
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
6.672 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
13,613.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Norway flag
Norway
4,058.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Panama flag
Panama
3,966.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
2,484.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
2,258.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,378.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,161.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Portugal flag
Portugal
563.499 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Namibia flag
Namibia
475.122 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
413.789 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
349.329 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
231.143 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Peru flag
Peru
231.035 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Morocco flag
Morocco
204.259 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
198.054 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
152.709 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
127.728 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
77.383 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
75.325 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mali flag
Mali
28.328 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Malawi flag
Malawi
9.235 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Romania flag
Romania
114.086 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
56.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
25.521 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Niger flag
Niger
1.717 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Philippines flag
Philippines
43.643 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Poland flag
Poland
41.992 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
54,509.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
22,735.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
19,189.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
7,988.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
7,737.53 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
4,093.83 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
United States flag
United States
3,006.87 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Sweden flag
Sweden
3,004.18 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Spain flag
Spain
992.303 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Thailand flag
Thailand
708.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
552.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
514.626 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
502.725 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Turkey flag
Turkey
358.223 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
349.918 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
104.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
82.664 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Singapore flag
Singapore
13.449 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
South Africa flag
South Africa
166.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Korea flag
South Korea
70.306 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
52.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
80.565 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
25.359 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
3.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.762 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  5. #5Albania flagAlbania
  6. #6Austria flagAustria
  7. #7Algeria flagAlgeria
  8. #8Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda
  9. #9Angola flagAngola
  10. #10Armenia flagArmenia

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157United Kingdom flagUnited Kingdom
  9. #156Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  10. #155Syrian Arab Republic flagSyrian Arab Republic

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1969, the metric of dam capacity per capita served as a crucial indicator of a country's ability to manage its water resources effectively. Expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, this statistic provided insights into the sustainability and development potential of different regions. Understanding a country's dam capacity per capita was vital not only for assessing water security but also for supporting agricultural, industrial, and community needs.

Global Insights on Dam Capacity

The global average dam capacity per capita in 1969 was approximately 1942.50 cubic meters per inhabitant. However, this average masked significant disparities between countries. At the top of the list, Suriname boasted a staggering capacity of 54509.9 cubic meters per person, followed by Canada and Zambia with 23832.3 and 22735.5 cubic meters, respectively. Such high capacities were indicative of these countries' vast water reserves and strategic investments in dam infrastructure.

Conversely, several countries reported minimal or zero dam capacities, including Cambodia, Nepal, and Fiji. These figures highlighted challenges related to infrastructure development and geographical limitations, which could hinder their efforts in achieving long-term water security and sustainable growth.

Regional Disparities and Influencing Factors

Examining the regional disparities in dam capacity per capita reveals a stark contrast between water-rich and water-scarce regions. Countries like Suriname and Canada, with vast natural water resources and lower population densities, naturally exhibited higher dam capacities. In contrast, densely populated countries or nations with limited access to water resources struggled to achieve comparable per capita figures.

Africa presented an intriguing case. Countries like Zambia and Zimbabwe ranked among the top 10, reflecting strategic dam investments and resource availability. However, other African nations such as Rwanda and Benin reported no significant dam capacity per capita, underscoring the uneven distribution of water resources across the continent.

Year-over-Year Changes and Trends

Between 1968 and 1969, several countries experienced notable changes in their dam capacity per capita. For instance, Canada saw an increase of 851.10 cubic meters (3.7%), reflecting ongoing efforts to enhance water storage infrastructure. Similarly, Norway and Spain reported increases, with Spain showing a significant 19.6% rise. These improvements were likely driven by policy initiatives focusing on water conservation and infrastructure expansion.

On the downside, Suriname experienced the largest decrease in dam capacity per capita, dropping by 1889.10 cubic meters (-3.3%). Other countries like Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Nicaragua also witnessed declines, indicative of potential challenges in maintaining or expanding their existing water storage capabilities.

Policy Implications and Future Prospects

The wide range in dam capacity per capita in 1969 suggested varying levels of governmental commitment to water management policies. Countries with higher capacities likely prioritized water security through substantial investments in dam infrastructure and technology. In contrast, nations with lower capacities faced the challenge of balancing rapid population growth with limited water resources, necessitating innovative solutions and international cooperation.

Looking ahead, countries with lower dam capacities per capita in 1969 needed to forge strategic partnerships and secure funding for dam projects to enhance their water security. The experiences of nations like Canada and Spain demonstrated the potential benefits of proactive water management policies, which could serve as models for other countries aiming to improve their dam storage capabilities.

Environmental and Economic Impact

The environmental implications of dam capacity per capita were significant. High capacities often correlated with extensive dam networks, which could alter ecosystems and affect biodiversity. Thus, it became essential for countries to consider sustainable practices when expanding their water storage facilities.

Economically, countries with substantial dam capacities were better positioned to support agriculture and industry, fostering economic growth. Regions like South America, where Brazil had a capacity of 4582.86 cubic meters, could leverage their water resources to boost agricultural outputs and industrial processes.

The 1969 dam capacity per capita data underscored the critical role of water management in ensuring sustainable development. It highlighted the need for ongoing investment in infrastructure, careful environmental stewardship, and international collaboration to address the disparities and challenges in global water resource management.

Insights by country

1

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone ranked 70th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1969, with a recorded capacity of 82.6643 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights a relatively significant level of water storage infrastructure available to the population at the time, reflecting the country’s investment in water management and agricultural support.

The capacity indicates an effort to harness water resources for agriculture and domestic use, which is crucial in a country where rainfall variability can impact food security. Factors contributing to this capacity include the geographical features of Sierra Leone, which is endowed with numerous rivers and a generally wet tropical climate that facilitates the construction of dams.

Interestingly, while Sierra Leone had a commendable dam capacity per capita, the overall development of infrastructure and economic stability in the country has faced challenges in subsequent decades, impacting the effective utilization of such resources. Overall, the statistic from 1969 serves as a historical benchmark for understanding the evolution of water management and resource allocation in Sierra Leone.

2

Montenegro

In 1969, Montenegro ranked 140 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant lack of substantial water storage infrastructure relative to its population, which may have implications for water management and agricultural practices in the region.

The absence of dam capacity in Montenegro during this period can be attributed to various factors, including limited industrial development and the geographic characteristics of the region, which may not have favored large-scale dam construction. Additionally, the focus on other infrastructural developments might have diverted resources away from water management projects.

Historically, Montenegro has relied heavily on its natural water resources and river systems, which can provide sufficient water supply without the need for extensive dam infrastructure. This reliance on natural water bodies reflects a broader trend in many smaller nations, where the immediate environmental landscape plays a critical role in resource management strategies.

3

Algeria

In 1969, Algeria ranked 61st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 132.662 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage water resources effectively, particularly in the context of its diverse geography that includes both arid and semi-arid regions.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Algeria's investment in hydroelectric projects and water storage systems, which are crucial for supporting agriculture and providing water to its population. Given the country's significant reliance on agriculture, particularly in rural areas, the infrastructure for water management has been a priority for national development.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that Algeria's water management strategies have evolved over the years, influenced by both climatic conditions and population growth. The emphasis on dam construction during this period was also a response to the need for improved irrigation and flood control, essential for sustaining agricultural productivity in a predominantly desert landscape.

4

Ecuador

In 1969, Ecuador ranked 93rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 17.6897 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to harness water resources for various uses, including agriculture, hydroelectric power generation, and domestic water supply.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic diversity, economic challenges, and the developmental stage of its infrastructure at the time. During this period, Ecuador was still in the process of developing its hydroelectric potential, which is significant given the country's numerous rivers and varied topography.

Additionally, the water management strategies in 1969 were still evolving, with investments in large-scale dam projects only gaining momentum in later decades. As a point of interest, Ecuador has since increased its focus on renewable energy sources, particularly hydropower, which now plays a crucial role in its energy portfolio.

5

Cyprus

In 1969, Cyprus ranked 83rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 45.7837 cubic meters per inhabitant. This metric reflects the country's ability to store water for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use, which is particularly significant given Cyprus's Mediterranean climate characterized by hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita in Cyprus during this period can be attributed to several factors, including the island's geographical constraints, limited natural water resources, and the historical context of development in the region. The establishment of dams and water infrastructure was crucial for managing the water supply, especially in the face of increasing population demands and agricultural needs.

Interestingly, water management and conservation have continued to evolve in Cyprus, with ongoing efforts to enhance water supply through additional infrastructure and improved efficiency. Additionally, the significance of water resources management has grown due to environmental concerns and changing climate patterns, making the historical context of 1969 a pivotal reference point.

6

Rwanda

In 1969, Rwanda ranked 148th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the limited infrastructure for water resource management and energy generation in the country during this period.

The absence of dam capacity indicates a lack of investment in hydroelectric power and water storage facilities, which could be attributed to Rwanda's economic challenges and political instability. The nation was still recovering from the aftermath of colonial rule and grappling with issues related to governance and resource allocation.

Additionally, Rwanda's geographical landscape, characterized by its hilly terrain, may have posed challenges for the construction and maintenance of large-scale dams. The low dam capacity per capita during this time stands in contrast to the rapid development of the country's energy sector in the following decades, leading to significant improvements in water management and electricity generation.

7

Sudan

In 1969, Sudan ranked 159 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of infrastructure for water storage and management, reflecting the country's challenges in harnessing its water resources effectively.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to a combination of factors, including political instability, limited investment in infrastructure, and economic challenges that hindered the development of essential water management systems. Additionally, the Nile River, which flows through Sudan, has historically been subject to competing claims from multiple countries, complicating cooperative projects for dam construction.

Water scarcity has been a persistent issue in Sudan, exacerbated by factors such as climate variability and population growth. In the years following 1969, the country faced ongoing conflicts and governance issues that further restricted the development of water infrastructure and management, leading to continued challenges in meeting the water needs of its population.

8

Croatia

In 1969, Croatia ranked 122nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates that during this period, the country lacked significant infrastructure related to water storage or management, which may have impacted its ability to support agricultural irrigation and hydroelectric power generation.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's historical context, which involves periods of conflict and economic challenges that may have limited investment in infrastructure development. Additionally, Croatia's geographical features, characterized by numerous rivers and lakes, may have influenced the prioritization of water management strategies.

Furthermore, the importance of dam construction has grown in subsequent decades, and today, Croatia has made advancements in water management and hydroelectric power, reflecting a shift towards sustainable resource utilization. As of recent statistics, the country has developed significant capacity in this area, contrasting sharply with the situation in 1969.

9

Congo

In 1969, Congo ranked 97th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 6.2676 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's ability to harness and store water resources for various uses, including agriculture, drinking water supply, and energy generation.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's developmental challenges, limited infrastructure investment, and the impact of political instability during that period. Additionally, the natural geography of Congo, which includes significant river systems, may not have necessitated extensive dam construction compared to other regions with less accessible water resources.

As a related statistic, it is worth noting that during the same era, many countries in Africa were facing similar challenges in water management and infrastructure development, leading to varying levels of dam capacity and resource utilization across the continent.

10

United States

In 1969, the United States ranked 15th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive statistic of 3006.87 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects the country's extensive investment in water resources management and infrastructure, which is essential for supporting agriculture, industry, and urban development.

The significant dam capacity in the United States during this period can be attributed to the country's vast geographical area, diverse climate, and the need for effective flood control and irrigation systems. The construction of major dams, such as the Hoover Dam and Glen Canyon Dam, played a crucial role in harnessing water resources and providing hydroelectric power, which also contributed to economic growth.

Additionally, the focus on developing large-scale water projects in the mid-20th century was driven by post-war expansion and an increasing emphasis on industrialization. This era saw a surge in infrastructure projects, which not only improved water availability but also showcased the technological prowess of the United States in civil engineering.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts