Dam capacity per capita 1998
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 27,710.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Iceland | 8,413.02 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Ghana | 7,946.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Norway | 7,428.02 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Paraguay | 6,842.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Nicaragua | 6,553.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Russia | 5,429.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | New Zealand | 4,430.87 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Mozambique | 4,275.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Panama | 3,008.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Mali | 1,246.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Mexico | 1,167.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Malaysia | 1,019.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | North Macedonia | 804.832 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | North Korea | 765.559 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Portugal | 725.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Netherlands | 583.429 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Morocco | 570.259 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Romania | 496.408 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Nigeria | 422.764 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Namibia | 408.908 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Republic of Moldova | 261.073 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Peru | 222.885 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Mauritania | 202.049 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Pakistan | 189.354 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Luxembourg | 142.923 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Lithuania | 139.581 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Mongolia | 103.615 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Myanmar | 85.955 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Libya | 75.844 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Poland | 72.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Philippines | 71.948 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Mauritius | 56.372 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Oman | 33.917 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Madagascar | 31.858 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Saint Lucia | 16.809 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Niger | 7.762 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Malawi | 3.869 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Nepal | 3.602 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Malta | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Suriname | 43,724.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Zambia | 10,665.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Zimbabwe | 8,615.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Iraq | 6,633.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Venezuela | 6,506.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Uruguay | 5,295.52 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Kazakhstan | 5,109.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,788.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Tajikistan | 4,690.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Australia | 4,159.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Sweden | 4,062.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Brazil | 3,877.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Finland | 3,609.75 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Argentina | 3,599.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Uganda | 3,553.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Tanzania | 3,213.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Azerbaijan | 2,664.46 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | United States | 2,660.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Egypt | 2,404.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Turkey | 2,361.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2,235 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lesotho | 1,411.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Laos | 1,350.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Spain | 1,291.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Thailand | 1,267.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Albania | 1,255.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Turkmenistan | 1,126.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Greece | 1,120.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Cameroon | 1,103.63 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Guyana | 1,059.67 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Ukraine | 936.885 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Honduras | 931.064 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Uzbekistan | 891.318 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Syrian Arab Republic | 874.298 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Kenya | 857.121 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Bulgaria | 800.964 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Chile | 779.455 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Georgia | 745.971 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 712.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | El Salvador | 659.606 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | South Africa | 648.416 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Ecuador | 621.924 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Vietnam | 548.195 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Costa Rica | 516.456 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Switzerland | 470.234 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Cuba | 456.028 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Burkina Faso | 443.333 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Armenia | 432.275 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Latvia | 416.976 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | China | 383.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Togo | 353.322 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | South Korea | 350.415 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Slovakia | 321.259 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Sri Lanka | 319.531 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Czech Republic | 310.197 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Cyprus | 303.873 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Iran | 296.018 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Angola | 294.881 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Botswana | 282.348 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Sao Tome and Principe | 277.085 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Austria | 266.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Eswatini | 248.114 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Japan | 235.846 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Ireland | 234.164 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Colombia | 233.651 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Dominican Republic | 228.835 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Tunisia | 216.855 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Croatia | 216.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | India | 210.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Gabon | 181.558 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | France | 169.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Italy | 162.537 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Fiji | 161.75 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Algeria | 158.855 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Brunei Darussalam | 144.095 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Belarus | 132.492 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Estonia | 129.322 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Indonesia | 106.482 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Afghanistan | 104.854 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Saudi Arabia | 63.219 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Samoa | 55.896 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Trinidad and Tobago | 54.548 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sierra Leone | 51.213 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Senegal | 26.308 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | United Kingdom | 89.916 cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Liberia | 89.359 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Ethiopia | 88.456 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Antigua and Barbuda | 69.339 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Bolivia | 67.173 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Lebanon | 52.616 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Bangladesh | 49.968 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Guatemala | 41.41 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Germany | 41.148 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Haiti | 37.115 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Jordan | 31.489 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Guinea | 29.325 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Hungary | 25.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Yemen | 22.191 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Eritrea | 20.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Singapore | 19.198 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Slovenia | 16.919 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | United Arab Emirates | 15.183 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Belgium | 14.126 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 12.388 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Belize | 7.55 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Denmark | 3.771 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Benin | 3.461 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo | 3.049 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Jamaica | 2.121 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.118 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Grenada | 0.208 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Cambodia | 0.083 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Bahrain | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Guinea-Bissau
- #158
Cabo Verde
- #157
Bhutan
- #156
Bahrain
- #155
Cambodia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Understanding Dam Capacity per Capita in 1998
In 1998, the metric of dam capacity per capita became an important indicator of water resource management on a global scale. Measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, this statistic provides insights into how countries manage their water storage infrastructure, which is vital for ensuring water security, supporting agriculture, and fostering sustainable development. The year 1998 offered a revealing snapshot of global disparities and trends in water resource availability.
Top Performers and Outliers in Dam Capacity
The data for 1998 highlighted stark contrasts between countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. At the forefront was Suriname, with an impressive 43,724.8 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting a robust water storage system relative to its population size. Following Suriname, Canada and Zambia demonstrated significant capacities of 27,710.2 and 10,665.4 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These figures underscore not only the availability of natural water resources in these regions but also the investment in infrastructure to harness them.
Conversely, several countries, including Cabo Verde, Malta, and the Maldives, reported zero cubic meters per capita. This absence of measurable dam capacity indicates a reliance on alternative water sources or potential vulnerabilities in water security, possibly due to geographic constraints or limited investment in water infrastructure.
Regional Clustering and Geographic Patterns
Geographically, there were distinct patterns in dam capacity per capita in 1998. North America, represented by Canada, showed high levels of water storage, likely attributed to both its vast freshwater resources and well-developed infrastructure. In contrast, several island nations and regions with limited freshwater access demonstrated minimal or no dam capacity, such as the Maldives and Cabo Verde. This geographic clustering suggests that natural resource endowment, coupled with economic capacity, significantly influences a country's ability to develop water storage systems.
Historical Trends and Year-over-Year Changes
Examining year-over-year changes provided further insights into global trends. While the average change was a slight decrease of 0.3%, certain countries experienced significant shifts. Paraguay saw a remarkable increase of 42.5%, adding 2,039.32 cubic meters per inhabitant, highlighting effective water management policies or infrastructural investments. In contrast, Suriname experienced a decrease of 911.40 cubic meters per capita, reflecting potential environmental changes or shifts in resource management strategies.
Policy Impact and Governance on Dam Capacity
The variations in dam capacity per capita in 1998 were also shaped by governance and policy decisions. Countries with proactive water management policies, like Saudi Arabia, which increased its capacity by 47%, demonstrated the impact of strategic governmental planning and investment. Such policies ensure that infrastructure development aligns with population growth and economic needs, mitigating risks of water scarcity.
In contrast, countries experiencing declines, such as Ghana and Iraq, may reflect the challenges of maintaining existing infrastructure amidst socio-political changes or economic constraints. The integration of international agreements and cooperation could play a pivotal role in stabilizing and enhancing these capacities.
Sustainability and Future Projections
Looking forward, the insights from 1998 emphasize the importance of balancing development with sustainability. The dam capacity per capita metric serves as a critical tool for understanding how effectively countries can support their populations with secure water resources. As climate change continues to impact water availability, countries may need to prioritize investments in sustainable water infrastructure and innovative technologies to enhance resilience. Policymakers should focus on integrating sustainable practices within water management to ensure long-term stability and growth.
In conclusion, the global statistics of dam capacity per capita in 1998 offer a lens into the varied approaches and challenges nations face in managing their water resources. By understanding these patterns, stakeholders can better address the pressing need for sustainable water management to support a growing global population.
Insights by country
Eritrea
Eritrea was ranked 134th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1998. The dam capacity per capita for Eritrea was recorded at 20.2301 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively low level of water storage capacity available for each citizen.
This statistic reflects the country's challenges in water resource management and infrastructure development, which have been influenced by factors such as prolonged conflicts, economic difficulties, and limited investment in public services. Additionally, the harsh climate and arid conditions prevalent in many regions of Eritrea further complicate water resource availability.
It is noteworthy that low dam capacity per capita can lead to significant implications for agricultural productivity, drinking water supply, and overall economic development. As a result, countries with limited water storage often face heightened vulnerabilities to drought and food insecurity, making effective water management policies critical for their sustainability and growth.
Sierra Leone
In 1998, Sierra Leone ranked 122nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 51.213 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population size, which presents challenges for both water supply and agriculture.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country’s ongoing recovery from a devastating civil war that lasted from 1991 to 2002. The conflict severely impacted infrastructure development and maintenance, leading to inadequate investments in essential utilities like water management systems.
Furthermore, Sierra Leone's geographical and climatic conditions, characterized by a tropical climate and seasonal rainfall, influence water management practices. Despite its challenges, investments in improving dam capacity and water resource management are crucial for enhancing water availability and supporting agricultural productivity in the future.
Poland
In 1998, Poland ranked 113th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 72.0103 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's water management infrastructure and its ability to store water resources for various uses, including irrigation, hydroelectric power generation, and flood control.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita in Poland can be attributed to its geographical features, including a significant number of rivers and lakes, which provide natural water resources. Additionally, the period following the end of communism in 1989 saw changes in infrastructure investment priorities, impacting the development of water management systems.
Overall, Poland's dam capacity per capita is an important aspect of its water resource management strategy, especially given the country's agricultural needs and its commitment to sustainable development. Notably, Poland's investment in renewable energy sources, including hydropower, has gained importance in recent years as part of broader environmental initiatives.
Portugal
In 1998, Portugal ranked 54th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 725.27 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's substantial investment in hydraulic infrastructure, which is essential for managing water resources, especially given Portugal's varied climate and the importance of agriculture in its economy.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Portugal's emphasis on renewable energy sources, particularly hydropower. The country has historically utilized its river systems, such as the Douro and Tagus, to support its energy needs, contributing to this impressive capacity. Such infrastructure not only facilitates energy production but also plays a crucial role in flood control and irrigation.
Moreover, as of the late 1990s, Portugal was undergoing significant modernization and development, which likely spurred investment in water management systems. This period was marked by the integration of EU policies that encouraged sustainable practices, further enhancing the nation's water infrastructure resilience.
Norway
In 1998, Norway ranked 7th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive capacity of 7428.02 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high ranking reflects Norway's extensive investment in hydropower infrastructure, which is a significant component of its energy production strategy.
The substantial dam capacity per capita is largely attributed to Norway's geography, characterized by numerous rivers and a rugged landscape conducive to hydropower generation. As a result, approximately 98% of Norway's electricity is generated from renewable sources, primarily hydropower, making it one of the world's leading nations in sustainable energy.
Additionally, the country's commitment to environmental sustainability and innovative engineering practices has allowed it to maintain and expand its dam infrastructure, further enhancing its capacity. Norway's focus on renewable energy not only meets domestic energy needs but also positions the country as a significant exporter of electricity to neighboring countries.
Madagascar
In 1998, Madagascar ranked 128th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 31.858 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure for water storage and management, which has significant implications for agricultural productivity and access to clean water.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including economic constraints, a lack of investment in infrastructure, and the geographical challenges posed by Madagascar's diverse terrain. These factors hinder the development of extensive water management systems that could enhance water availability for both domestic and agricultural use.
Interestingly, Madagascar's water resources are heavily influenced by its unique biodiversity and climatic conditions, which can lead to both flooding and drought. Enhanced dam capacity could potentially mitigate these issues, underscoring the importance of developing sustainable water management practices in the region.
Algeria
In 1998, Algeria ranked 99th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 158.855 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage and store water resources in a region characterized by its arid climate and limited freshwater availability.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Algeria's geographical conditions, economic constraints, and the historical development of its water infrastructure. Despite being rich in natural resources, the country has faced challenges in investing adequately in water management and technology.
Moreover, Algeria's population growth and urbanization have increased the demand for water, further emphasizing the need for improved storage capacities. In context, while Algeria's dam capacity is significant for its population, it underscores the ongoing challenges of water scarcity and resource management faced by many North African nations.
Mali
Mali ranks 37th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 1246.84 cubic meters per inhabitant recorded in the year 1998. This significant capacity reflects the country's efforts to harness water resources for agricultural, domestic, and industrial use, especially in a region often challenged by arid conditions.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Mali's extensive river systems, including the Niger River, which is crucial for irrigation and hydroelectric power generation. Additionally, government investments in water management infrastructure and international aid have played a role in enhancing water storage capacity in the face of increasing demand due to population growth and climate variability.
Furthermore, it is important to note that while this statistic indicates a strong potential for water resource management, challenges remain in equitable access and infrastructure maintenance, which can impact the overall effectiveness of these water resources in addressing the needs of the population.
Pakistan
In 1998, Pakistan ranked 94th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 189.354 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant reliance on water resources for agriculture, energy production, and domestic use.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic and climatic conditions, as well as historical underinvestment in infrastructure. Pakistan's extensive river systems, primarily the Indus River and its tributaries, play a crucial role in water management, yet challenges such as sedimentation, climate variability, and population growth continue to strain water resources.
Moreover, Pakistan's water availability is increasingly threatened by factors such as climate change, which has led to altered precipitation patterns and increased frequency of droughts. The country has been urged to enhance its water storage capacity to better manage its water resources, especially given that agriculture employs a significant portion of the population and is heavily dependent on consistent water supply.
Russia
In 1998, Russia held the 12th position globally for dam capacity per capita, with a remarkable capacity of 5429.21 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the extensive network of dams and reservoirs that have been developed throughout the country, primarily for hydroelectric power generation, irrigation, and flood control.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Russia's vast geographic expanse, which includes numerous rivers and lakes, making it suitable for large-scale hydropower projects. Additionally, the country's investment in infrastructure during the Soviet era laid the groundwork for substantial water resource management systems that continue to influence capacity figures today.
Notably, Russia's extensive hydropower resources contribute to its energy supply, with hydropower constituting a significant portion of the country's renewable energy production. This capacity not only supports local energy needs but also plays a role in regional energy exports.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data