Dam capacity per capita 1998

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
27,710.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Iceland flag
Iceland
8,413.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Ghana flag
Ghana
7,946.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Norway flag
Norway
7,428.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
6,842.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
6,553.59 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Russia flag
Russia
5,429.21 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
4,430.87 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
4,275.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Panama flag
Panama
3,008.73 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Mali flag
Mali
1,246.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,167.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
1,019.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
804.832 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
North Korea flag
North Korea
765.559 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Portugal flag
Portugal
725.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
583.429 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Morocco flag
Morocco
570.259 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Romania flag
Romania
496.408 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
422.764 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Namibia flag
Namibia
408.908 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
261.073 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Peru flag
Peru
222.885 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
202.049 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
189.354 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
142.923 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
139.581 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
103.615 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
85.955 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Libya flag
Libya
75.844 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Poland flag
Poland
72.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Philippines flag
Philippines
71.948 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
56.372 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Oman flag
Oman
33.917 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
31.858 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
16.809 cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Niger flag
Niger
7.762 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Malawi flag
Malawi
3.869 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Nepal flag
Nepal
3.602 cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Maldives flag
Maldives
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Malta flag
Malta
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Suriname flag
Suriname
43,724.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Zambia flag
Zambia
10,665.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
8,615.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Iraq flag
Iraq
6,633.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
6,506.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,295.52 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
5,109.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
4,788.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
4,690.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Australia flag
Australia
4,159.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,062.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,877.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Finland flag
Finland
3,609.75 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,599.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Uganda flag
Uganda
3,553.06 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
3,213.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
2,664.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
United States flag
United States
2,660.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,404.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Turkey flag
Turkey
2,361.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
2,235 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
1,411.57 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Laos flag
Laos
1,350.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Spain flag
Spain
1,291.59 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,267.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Albania flag
Albania
1,255.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
1,126.74 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Greece flag
Greece
1,120.71 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,103.63 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,059.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
936.885 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Honduras flag
Honduras
931.064 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
891.318 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
874.298 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Kenya flag
Kenya
857.121 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
800.964 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Chile flag
Chile
779.455 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Georgia flag
Georgia
745.971 cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
712.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
82
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
659.606 cubic meters per inhabitant
83
South Africa flag
South Africa
648.416 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
621.924 cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
548.195 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
516.456 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
470.234 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Cuba flag
Cuba
456.028 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
443.333 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Armenia flag
Armenia
432.275 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Latvia flag
Latvia
416.976 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
China flag
China
383.21 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Togo flag
Togo
353.322 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
South Korea flag
South Korea
350.415 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
321.259 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
319.531 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
310.197 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
303.873 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Iran flag
Iran
296.018 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Angola flag
Angola
294.881 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Botswana flag
Botswana
282.348 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
277.085 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Austria flag
Austria
266.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
248.114 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Japan flag
Japan
235.846 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Ireland flag
Ireland
234.164 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Colombia flag
Colombia
233.651 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
228.835 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
216.855 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Croatia flag
Croatia
216.39 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
India flag
India
210.61 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Gabon flag
Gabon
181.558 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
France flag
France
169.57 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Italy flag
Italy
162.537 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Fiji flag
Fiji
161.75 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Algeria flag
Algeria
158.855 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
144.095 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Belarus flag
Belarus
132.492 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Estonia flag
Estonia
129.322 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
106.482 cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
104.854 cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
63.219 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Samoa flag
Samoa
55.896 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
54.548 cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
51.213 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Senegal flag
Senegal
26.308 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
89.916 cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Liberia flag
Liberia
89.359 cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
88.456 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
69.339 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
67.173 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
52.616 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
49.968 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
41.41 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Germany flag
Germany
41.148 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Haiti flag
Haiti
37.115 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Jordan flag
Jordan
31.489 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Guinea flag
Guinea
29.325 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Hungary flag
Hungary
25.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Yemen flag
Yemen
22.191 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
20.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Singapore flag
Singapore
19.198 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
16.919 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
15.183 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.126 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.388 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Belize flag
Belize
7.55 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.771 cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Benin flag
Benin
3.461 cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Congo flag
Congo
3.049 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.121 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.118 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.208 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0.083 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Iceland flagIceland
  3. #3Ghana flagGhana
  4. #4Norway flagNorway
  5. #5Paraguay flagParaguay
  6. #6Nicaragua flagNicaragua
  7. #7Russia flagRussia
  8. #8New Zealand flagNew Zealand
  9. #9Mozambique flagMozambique
  10. #10Panama flagPanama

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Sudan flagSudan
  2. #163State of Palestine flagState of Palestine
  3. #162Somalia flagSomalia
  4. #161Rwanda flagRwanda
  5. #160Papua New Guinea flagPapua New Guinea
  6. #159Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  7. #158Cabo Verde flagCabo Verde
  8. #157Bhutan flagBhutan
  9. #156Bahrain flagBahrain
  10. #155Cambodia flagCambodia

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

Understanding Dam Capacity per Capita in 1998

In 1998, the metric of dam capacity per capita became an important indicator of water resource management on a global scale. Measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, this statistic provides insights into how countries manage their water storage infrastructure, which is vital for ensuring water security, supporting agriculture, and fostering sustainable development. The year 1998 offered a revealing snapshot of global disparities and trends in water resource availability.

Top Performers and Outliers in Dam Capacity

The data for 1998 highlighted stark contrasts between countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. At the forefront was Suriname, with an impressive 43,724.8 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting a robust water storage system relative to its population size. Following Suriname, Canada and Zambia demonstrated significant capacities of 27,710.2 and 10,665.4 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These figures underscore not only the availability of natural water resources in these regions but also the investment in infrastructure to harness them.

Conversely, several countries, including Cabo Verde, Malta, and the Maldives, reported zero cubic meters per capita. This absence of measurable dam capacity indicates a reliance on alternative water sources or potential vulnerabilities in water security, possibly due to geographic constraints or limited investment in water infrastructure.

Regional Clustering and Geographic Patterns

Geographically, there were distinct patterns in dam capacity per capita in 1998. North America, represented by Canada, showed high levels of water storage, likely attributed to both its vast freshwater resources and well-developed infrastructure. In contrast, several island nations and regions with limited freshwater access demonstrated minimal or no dam capacity, such as the Maldives and Cabo Verde. This geographic clustering suggests that natural resource endowment, coupled with economic capacity, significantly influences a country's ability to develop water storage systems.

Examining year-over-year changes provided further insights into global trends. While the average change was a slight decrease of 0.3%, certain countries experienced significant shifts. Paraguay saw a remarkable increase of 42.5%, adding 2,039.32 cubic meters per inhabitant, highlighting effective water management policies or infrastructural investments. In contrast, Suriname experienced a decrease of 911.40 cubic meters per capita, reflecting potential environmental changes or shifts in resource management strategies.

Policy Impact and Governance on Dam Capacity

The variations in dam capacity per capita in 1998 were also shaped by governance and policy decisions. Countries with proactive water management policies, like Saudi Arabia, which increased its capacity by 47%, demonstrated the impact of strategic governmental planning and investment. Such policies ensure that infrastructure development aligns with population growth and economic needs, mitigating risks of water scarcity.

In contrast, countries experiencing declines, such as Ghana and Iraq, may reflect the challenges of maintaining existing infrastructure amidst socio-political changes or economic constraints. The integration of international agreements and cooperation could play a pivotal role in stabilizing and enhancing these capacities.

Sustainability and Future Projections

Looking forward, the insights from 1998 emphasize the importance of balancing development with sustainability. The dam capacity per capita metric serves as a critical tool for understanding how effectively countries can support their populations with secure water resources. As climate change continues to impact water availability, countries may need to prioritize investments in sustainable water infrastructure and innovative technologies to enhance resilience. Policymakers should focus on integrating sustainable practices within water management to ensure long-term stability and growth.

In conclusion, the global statistics of dam capacity per capita in 1998 offer a lens into the varied approaches and challenges nations face in managing their water resources. By understanding these patterns, stakeholders can better address the pressing need for sustainable water management to support a growing global population.

Insights by country

1

Eritrea

Eritrea was ranked 134th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1998. The dam capacity per capita for Eritrea was recorded at 20.2301 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively low level of water storage capacity available for each citizen.

This statistic reflects the country's challenges in water resource management and infrastructure development, which have been influenced by factors such as prolonged conflicts, economic difficulties, and limited investment in public services. Additionally, the harsh climate and arid conditions prevalent in many regions of Eritrea further complicate water resource availability.

It is noteworthy that low dam capacity per capita can lead to significant implications for agricultural productivity, drinking water supply, and overall economic development. As a result, countries with limited water storage often face heightened vulnerabilities to drought and food insecurity, making effective water management policies critical for their sustainability and growth.

2

Sierra Leone

In 1998, Sierra Leone ranked 122nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 51.213 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population size, which presents challenges for both water supply and agriculture.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country’s ongoing recovery from a devastating civil war that lasted from 1991 to 2002. The conflict severely impacted infrastructure development and maintenance, leading to inadequate investments in essential utilities like water management systems.

Furthermore, Sierra Leone's geographical and climatic conditions, characterized by a tropical climate and seasonal rainfall, influence water management practices. Despite its challenges, investments in improving dam capacity and water resource management are crucial for enhancing water availability and supporting agricultural productivity in the future.

3

Poland

In 1998, Poland ranked 113th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 72.0103 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's water management infrastructure and its ability to store water resources for various uses, including irrigation, hydroelectric power generation, and flood control.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita in Poland can be attributed to its geographical features, including a significant number of rivers and lakes, which provide natural water resources. Additionally, the period following the end of communism in 1989 saw changes in infrastructure investment priorities, impacting the development of water management systems.

Overall, Poland's dam capacity per capita is an important aspect of its water resource management strategy, especially given the country's agricultural needs and its commitment to sustainable development. Notably, Poland's investment in renewable energy sources, including hydropower, has gained importance in recent years as part of broader environmental initiatives.

4

Portugal

In 1998, Portugal ranked 54th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 725.27 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's substantial investment in hydraulic infrastructure, which is essential for managing water resources, especially given Portugal's varied climate and the importance of agriculture in its economy.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Portugal's emphasis on renewable energy sources, particularly hydropower. The country has historically utilized its river systems, such as the Douro and Tagus, to support its energy needs, contributing to this impressive capacity. Such infrastructure not only facilitates energy production but also plays a crucial role in flood control and irrigation.

Moreover, as of the late 1990s, Portugal was undergoing significant modernization and development, which likely spurred investment in water management systems. This period was marked by the integration of EU policies that encouraged sustainable practices, further enhancing the nation's water infrastructure resilience.

5

Norway

In 1998, Norway ranked 7th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive capacity of 7428.02 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high ranking reflects Norway's extensive investment in hydropower infrastructure, which is a significant component of its energy production strategy.

The substantial dam capacity per capita is largely attributed to Norway's geography, characterized by numerous rivers and a rugged landscape conducive to hydropower generation. As a result, approximately 98% of Norway's electricity is generated from renewable sources, primarily hydropower, making it one of the world's leading nations in sustainable energy.

Additionally, the country's commitment to environmental sustainability and innovative engineering practices has allowed it to maintain and expand its dam infrastructure, further enhancing its capacity. Norway's focus on renewable energy not only meets domestic energy needs but also positions the country as a significant exporter of electricity to neighboring countries.

6

Madagascar

In 1998, Madagascar ranked 128th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 31.858 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure for water storage and management, which has significant implications for agricultural productivity and access to clean water.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including economic constraints, a lack of investment in infrastructure, and the geographical challenges posed by Madagascar's diverse terrain. These factors hinder the development of extensive water management systems that could enhance water availability for both domestic and agricultural use.

Interestingly, Madagascar's water resources are heavily influenced by its unique biodiversity and climatic conditions, which can lead to both flooding and drought. Enhanced dam capacity could potentially mitigate these issues, underscoring the importance of developing sustainable water management practices in the region.

7

Algeria

In 1998, Algeria ranked 99th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 158.855 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage and store water resources in a region characterized by its arid climate and limited freshwater availability.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Algeria's geographical conditions, economic constraints, and the historical development of its water infrastructure. Despite being rich in natural resources, the country has faced challenges in investing adequately in water management and technology.

Moreover, Algeria's population growth and urbanization have increased the demand for water, further emphasizing the need for improved storage capacities. In context, while Algeria's dam capacity is significant for its population, it underscores the ongoing challenges of water scarcity and resource management faced by many North African nations.

8

Mali

Mali ranks 37th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 1246.84 cubic meters per inhabitant recorded in the year 1998. This significant capacity reflects the country's efforts to harness water resources for agricultural, domestic, and industrial use, especially in a region often challenged by arid conditions.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Mali's extensive river systems, including the Niger River, which is crucial for irrigation and hydroelectric power generation. Additionally, government investments in water management infrastructure and international aid have played a role in enhancing water storage capacity in the face of increasing demand due to population growth and climate variability.

Furthermore, it is important to note that while this statistic indicates a strong potential for water resource management, challenges remain in equitable access and infrastructure maintenance, which can impact the overall effectiveness of these water resources in addressing the needs of the population.

9

Pakistan

In 1998, Pakistan ranked 94th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 189.354 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant reliance on water resources for agriculture, energy production, and domestic use.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic and climatic conditions, as well as historical underinvestment in infrastructure. Pakistan's extensive river systems, primarily the Indus River and its tributaries, play a crucial role in water management, yet challenges such as sedimentation, climate variability, and population growth continue to strain water resources.

Moreover, Pakistan's water availability is increasingly threatened by factors such as climate change, which has led to altered precipitation patterns and increased frequency of droughts. The country has been urged to enhance its water storage capacity to better manage its water resources, especially given that agriculture employs a significant portion of the population and is heavily dependent on consistent water supply.

10

Russia

In 1998, Russia held the 12th position globally for dam capacity per capita, with a remarkable capacity of 5429.21 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the extensive network of dams and reservoirs that have been developed throughout the country, primarily for hydroelectric power generation, irrigation, and flood control.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Russia's vast geographic expanse, which includes numerous rivers and lakes, making it suitable for large-scale hydropower projects. Additionally, the country's investment in infrastructure during the Soviet era laid the groundwork for substantial water resource management systems that continue to influence capacity figures today.

Notably, Russia's extensive hydropower resources contribute to its energy supply, with hydropower constituting a significant portion of the country's renewable energy production. This capacity not only supports local energy needs but also plays a role in regional energy exports.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts