Dam capacity per capita 1994

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
28,820.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Ghana flag
Ghana
8,738.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Iceland flag
Iceland
8,667.82 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Iraq flag
Iraq
7,537.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
4,690.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
4,671.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Australia flag
Australia
4,346.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,777.28 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,775.94 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Finland flag
Finland
3,655.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
2,810.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,616.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
2,606.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Laos flag
Laos
1,470.09 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Albania flag
Albania
1,232.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,228.71 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,070.56 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Greece flag
Greece
1,057.97 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Honduras flag
Honduras
1,040.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Kenya flag
Kenya
957.591 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Chile flag
Chile
806.247 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
781.766 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
774.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
678.844 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Georgia flag
Georgia
676.519 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
626.027 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
566.03 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
489.786 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Cuba flag
Cuba
459.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
451.518 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Armenia flag
Armenia
412.205 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Latvia flag
Latvia
398.614 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
353.986 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Angola flag
Angola
337.38 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Botswana flag
Botswana
310.752 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Iran flag
Iran
300.014 cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
287.416 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
China flag
China
281.249 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Austria flag
Austria
268.035 cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
260.134 cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Colombia flag
Colombia
251.375 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
244.534 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Ireland flag
Ireland
242.051 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Japan flag
Japan
231.411 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
India flag
India
220.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Croatia flag
Croatia
205.753 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Gabon flag
Gabon
200.965 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
France flag
France
171.847 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Fiji flag
Fiji
167.344 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Algeria flag
Algeria
163.722 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Italy flag
Italy
160.555 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
158.446 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Belarus flag
Belarus
130.555 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Estonia flag
Estonia
123.669 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
123.625 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Liberia flag
Liberia
110.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
99.265 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
90.583 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
75.116 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
7,035.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Norway flag
Norway
6,727.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Russia flag
Russia
5,408.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
5,150.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
4,931.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
4,663.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Panama flag
Panama
3,261.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Mali flag
Mali
1,366 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,207.59 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
1,126.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
822.968 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
North Korea flag
North Korea
796.927 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Portugal flag
Portugal
736.952 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
596.302 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Romania flag
Romania
479.411 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
469.377 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Namibia flag
Namibia
455.266 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Morocco flag
Morocco
426.698 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
254.259 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
222.276 cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
212.129 cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Peru flag
Peru
203.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
144.522 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
135.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
108.425 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
85.178 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Libya flag
Libya
80.856 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Philippines flag
Philippines
79.007 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Poland flag
Poland
63.983 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
58.759 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
36.247 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Niger flag
Niger
8.871 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Malawi flag
Malawi
4.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Maldives flag
Maldives
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Suriname flag
Suriname
47,351.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Zambia flag
Zambia
11,792.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
9,186.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
7,049.87 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,406.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
4,973.08 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,095.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Uganda flag
Uganda
3,978.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
3,539.04 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
United States flag
United States
2,765.48 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Turkey flag
Turkey
2,320.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,333.57 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Spain flag
Spain
1,262.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
1,207.17 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
957.647 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
955.881 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
906.368 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
South Africa flag
South Africa
675.419 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
577.939 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
478.081 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Togo flag
Togo
406.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
South Korea flag
South Korea
358.956 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
293.825 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
289.862 cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
255.958 cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
229.436 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Samoa flag
Samoa
57.75 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
55.474 cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
52.719 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
48.499 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
28.989 cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
90.883 cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
72.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
56.558 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
53.821 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
45.911 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Germany flag
Germany
41.268 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Haiti flag
Haiti
40.028 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Oman flag
Oman
34.388 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Guinea flag
Guinea
32.266 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Yemen flag
Yemen
25.225 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.797 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
23.047 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Jordan flag
Jordan
22.274 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Singapore flag
Singapore
21.915 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
17.822 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
17.594 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
16.849 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.283 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.943 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Nepal flag
Nepal
3.928 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Benin flag
Benin
3.855 cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.842 cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Congo flag
Congo
3.367 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.202 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.24 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.213 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Ghana flagGhana
  3. #3Iceland flagIceland
  4. #4Iraq flagIraq
  5. #5Kazakhstan flagKazakhstan
  6. #6Kyrgyzstan flagKyrgyzstan
  7. #7Australia flagAustralia
  8. #8Brazil flagBrazil
  9. #9Argentina flagArgentina
  10. #10Finland flagFinland

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Sudan flagSudan
  2. #163State of Palestine flagState of Palestine
  3. #162Somalia flagSomalia
  4. #161Rwanda flagRwanda
  5. #160Papua New Guinea flagPapua New Guinea
  6. #159Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  7. #158Cabo Verde flagCabo Verde
  8. #157Bhutan flagBhutan
  9. #156Belize flagBelize
  10. #155Cambodia flagCambodia

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1994, the measure of dam capacity per capita shed light on the critical state of water resource management across the globe. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, reveals how much water storage is available to each person in a country, offering a lens through which to examine the sustainability and development impacts of water management. Understanding dam capacity is imperative for addressing water security challenges, which are crucial for supporting agriculture, industries, and communities worldwide.

Understanding the Global Landscape of Dam Capacity in 1994

The data for 1994 presents a broad spectrum of dam capacity per capita across 157 countries, with a staggering maximum of 47,351.3 cubic meters per inhabitant in Suriname, contrasting sharply with several nations, including Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde, reporting a value of zero. The average global dam capacity stood at 1,709.56 cubic meters per person, while the median was significantly lower at 287.42 cubic meters, highlighting the disparity in water storage capabilities.

Suriname’s exceptional capacity can be attributed to its substantial hydroelectric infrastructure, which supports a small population, thereby inflating the per capita figure. In contrast, countries with minimal or no dam capacity, like Guinea-Bissau, face challenges related to infrastructure development and geographic limitations. These differences underscore the critical role of both natural endowments and policy decisions in shaping water resource management.

Regional Disparities and Their Underlying Causes

Analyzing the dam capacity per capita reveals fascinating regional disparities. In North America, Canada stands out with 28,820.1 cubic meters per inhabitant, primarily due to its vast geographic area and abundant freshwater resources, which have historically facilitated extensive dam construction. Meanwhile, Norway’s capacity of 6,727.34 cubic meters reflects its reliance on hydropower as a primary energy source, aligning with its commitment to sustainable energy practices.

In stark contrast, many African countries, such as Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda, exhibit negligible dam capacities. The underlying causes for these disparities often include a combination of economic constraints, political instability, and a lack of investment in infrastructure. Moreover, the geographical terrain and climate variability in these regions further complicate water storage solutions.

Yearly Fluctuations and Their Implications

The 1994 data also highlights notable yearly fluctuations, with countries like Tajikistan experiencing an impressive 88.6% increase in dam capacity per capita. This surge can be attributed to new dam projects and improvements in water management strategies. Argentina and Vietnam also saw significant increases, reflecting efforts to bolster water security through enhanced infrastructure.

Conversely, countries such as Iraq and Mozambique saw declines in capacity, with Iraq experiencing a 4.7% decrease. These reductions may be linked to factors such as prolonged droughts, maintenance challenges, or shifts in water usage policies. Such fluctuations underscore the dynamic nature of water resource management and the need for adaptive strategies to ensure long-term sustainability.

Policy Influence and Sustainability Trends

Policy decisions play a pivotal role in shaping the dam capacity per capita across nations. Countries with proactive water management policies often exhibit higher dam capacities, as seen in Canada and Norway. These nations prioritize investments in infrastructure and consider environmental impacts, aligning with global sustainability goals.

On the other hand, countries with lower capacities may struggle with policy implementation due to economic or political challenges. International collaborations and financial assistance can be instrumental in improving these situations, aiding in the development of infrastructure and the adoption of sustainable practices.

The Future Outlook for Dam Capacity

As the world continues to grapple with climate change and increasing water demands, the measure of dam capacity per capita will remain a crucial indicator of water resource management effectiveness. Nations will need to innovate and adapt their strategies to mitigate the impacts of climate variability and ensure equitable water distribution.

The 1994 data provides a snapshot of a world at a crossroads, with varying degrees of preparedness for future water challenges. Enhancing dam capacity, particularly in regions with current deficits, will be vital for achieving sustainable development and ensuring water security for all inhabitants in the decades to come.

Insights by country

1

India

In 1994, India ranked 91st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 220.11 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure development in water resource management, essential for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including India's vast population, which was approximately 900 million in 1994, placing significant pressure on available water resources. Additionally, India's diverse climatic conditions and varying geographical features have influenced the distribution and construction of dams across the country.

Notably, the development of dam infrastructure is crucial for mitigating issues related to water scarcity and flood control. As of 1994, India was increasingly investing in hydropower projects, which not only contribute to energy needs but also enhance water storage capacity, crucial for agricultural sustainability.

2

Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea ranked 159th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1994, with a value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of large-scale water storage infrastructure relative to the country's population, which can have profound implications for water resource management and development.

The absence of dam capacity can be attributed to various factors, including the country's challenging geographical terrain, which consists of mountainous regions and numerous islands, making the construction of large dams logistically difficult. Additionally, Papua New Guinea has faced economic constraints and prioritization of other infrastructural needs over water storage solutions.

Interestingly, the lack of dam infrastructure can exacerbate issues related to water supply, especially during droughts or in rural areas where water accessibility is critical for agriculture and daily living. This situation highlights the broader challenges faced by developing nations in managing natural resources effectively for their populations.

3

Angola

In 1994, Angola had a dam capacity per capita of 337.38 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 74th out of 164 countries. This statistic highlights the country's relatively moderate water storage capacity in relation to its population, which was significant for a nation still recovering from the impacts of a prolonged civil war that began in 1975 and lasted until 2002.

The capacity of dams in Angola is influenced by several factors, including the country's geographical diversity, the presence of major rivers such as the Congo and the Zambezi, and the historical development of its water infrastructure. However, issues such as underinvestment, lack of maintenance, and political instability have hindered the optimal development and management of such resources.

In a broader context, Angola's dam capacity per capita is essential for understanding the country's potential for hydropower generation and irrigation, which are critical for economic development and food security. The statistic also reflects on the ongoing challenges that Angola faces in terms of water resource management and the need for improved infrastructure to support its growing population.

4

South Korea

In 1994, South Korea ranked 72nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 358.956 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is crucial for supporting its industrial economy and urban population.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to South Korea's geography, characterized by mountainous terrain and significant rainfall, necessitating the construction of reservoirs for water supply and flood control. Additionally, rapid industrialization during the late 20th century increased the demand for reliable water resources for both domestic and industrial use.

As of the early 1990s, South Korea was undergoing transformative economic growth, which often leads to increased infrastructure development. This trend is consistent with other countries that prioritize water management to sustain economic expansion and ensure water security for their populations.

5

China

In 1994, China ranked 80th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 281.249 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the extensive network of dams and water management systems that China has developed to support its large population and agricultural needs.

The significant dam capacity per capita can be attributed to China's rapid industrialization and urbanization during the late 20th century, which necessitated comprehensive water resource management to sustain economic growth and ensure water availability for both domestic and agricultural use. Major projects, such as the construction of the Three Gorges Dam, highlight the country's commitment to enhancing its infrastructure to support its vast population.

Additionally, China's focus on hydroelectric power generation has played a crucial role in increasing dam capacities, making it one of the leading countries in renewable energy production. By 1994, these developments were already paving the way for China's future advancements in water management and energy sustainability.

6

Egypt

In 1994, Egypt ranked 29th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 2616.4 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects Egypt's significant investment in water management infrastructure, particularly given its reliance on the Nile River as a primary water source for agriculture, drinking, and industry.

The high dam capacity per capita indicates a robust system for water storage and management, which is crucial for a country that faces challenges such as arid climate conditions and population growth. Factors contributing to this statistic include the construction of major dams, like the Aswan High Dam, which has played a pivotal role in regulating water supply, controlling floods, and generating hydroelectric power.

Additionally, Egypt's strategic focus on water resource management has implications for agricultural productivity and economic stability, making the dam capacity an important statistic in understanding the nation's infrastructure and its socio-economic context. As of 1994, the effective management of water resources was essential for sustaining the livelihoods of millions in a predominantly desert environment.

7

Lithuania

Lithuania ranked 102nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1994, with a capacity of 135.49 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s infrastructure for water management and its ability to harness hydropower resources during a period of significant transition following the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Lithuania's geographical landscape, which consists of numerous rivers and lakes, but also reflects the challenges faced in developing robust water management systems during the early post-independence years. The emphasis on improving energy independence and sustainable practices has influenced the water infrastructure development in Lithuania.

In comparison to other European nations, Lithuania's dam capacity per capita indicates a potential for growth in the hydropower sector, as many countries in the region have invested heavily in renewable energy sources. This statistic underscores the importance of continued investment in water management and hydropower as Lithuania progresses towards more sustainable energy solutions.

8

Afghanistan

In 1994, Afghanistan had a dam capacity per capita of 123.625 cubic meters, ranking it 105th out of 164 countries. This statistic reflects the nation's limited water resource management and infrastructure development, particularly in the context of ongoing conflict and instability during that period.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's challenging geography, historical neglect of water infrastructure, and the impacts of prolonged civil strife which hindered investment in essential services. Additionally, Afghanistan's agriculture, which relies heavily on irrigation, faced significant challenges due to the lack of reliable water storage facilities.

Interestingly, Afghanistan's water resource management is critical, as the country is home to several major rivers, including the Helmand and Kabul Rivers, which are vital for its agricultural output. Improving dam capacity is essential for addressing water scarcity and enhancing food security in the region.

9

Samoa

Samoa ranked 118th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1994. The country's dam capacity per capita was measured at 57.7504 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting the availability of water resources in relation to its population size.

This statistic indicates a moderate level of water storage infrastructure for a small island nation. Factors contributing to this capacity include the geographical features of Samoa, which consists of volcanic islands that may have limited space for large reservoirs, as well as the reliance on rainfall for freshwater supply.

Additionally, the development of dam capacity can be influenced by economic factors, governmental investment in infrastructure, and the prioritization of water management strategies. In comparison, larger or more industrialized nations often exhibit significantly higher per capita dam capacities due to extensive water management systems.

10

Armenia

In 1994, Armenia ranked 69th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 412.205 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's considerable water resource management capabilities in the post-Soviet era, as Armenia faced various challenges in infrastructure and development during this transitional period.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Armenia's geographical features, which include mountainous terrain and significant water resources from rivers and reservoirs. Additionally, the establishment of various dams and hydroelectric plants has been crucial for the country’s energy generation and irrigation needs, especially considering its predominantly agricultural economy.

Furthermore, Armenia's focus on enhancing its water management systems has been essential for addressing water scarcity issues and supporting rural livelihoods. In comparison, other countries with similar geographical challenges often struggle with water management, emphasizing the importance of this statistic in understanding Armenia's resource situation during the mid-1990s.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts