Dam capacity per capita 1994
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 28,820.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Ghana | 8,738.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Iceland | 8,667.82 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Iraq | 7,537.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Kazakhstan | 4,690.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,671.85 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Australia | 4,346.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Brazil | 3,777.28 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Argentina | 3,775.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Finland | 3,655.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Azerbaijan | 2,810.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Egypt | 2,616.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2,606.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Laos | 1,470.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Albania | 1,232.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Cameroon | 1,228.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Guyana | 1,070.56 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Greece | 1,057.97 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Honduras | 1,040.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Kenya | 957.591 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Chile | 806.247 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 781.766 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Bulgaria | 774.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | El Salvador | 678.844 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Georgia | 676.519 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Ecuador | 626.027 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Costa Rica | 566.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Burkina Faso | 489.786 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Cuba | 459.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Lesotho | 451.518 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Armenia | 412.205 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Latvia | 398.614 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Cyprus | 353.986 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Angola | 337.38 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Botswana | 310.752 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Iran | 300.014 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Czech Republic | 287.416 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | China | 281.249 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Austria | 268.035 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Eswatini | 260.134 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Colombia | 251.375 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Dominican Republic | 244.534 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Ireland | 242.051 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Japan | 231.411 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | India | 220.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Croatia | 205.753 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Gabon | 200.965 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | France | 171.847 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Fiji | 167.344 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Algeria | 163.722 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Italy | 160.555 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Brunei Darussalam | 158.446 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Belarus | 130.555 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Estonia | 123.669 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Afghanistan | 123.625 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Liberia | 110.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Ethiopia | 99.265 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Indonesia | 90.583 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Antigua and Barbuda | 75.116 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Nicaragua | 7,035.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Norway | 6,727.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Russia | 5,408.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Paraguay | 5,150.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Mozambique | 4,931.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | New Zealand | 4,663.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Panama | 3,261.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Mali | 1,366 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Mexico | 1,207.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Malaysia | 1,126.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | North Macedonia | 822.968 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | North Korea | 796.927 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Portugal | 736.952 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Netherlands | 596.302 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Romania | 479.411 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Nigeria | 469.377 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Namibia | 455.266 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Morocco | 426.698 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Republic of Moldova | 254.259 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Mauritania | 222.276 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Pakistan | 212.129 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Peru | 203.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Luxembourg | 144.522 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | 135.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Mongolia | 108.425 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Myanmar | 85.178 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Libya | 80.856 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Philippines | 79.007 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Poland | 63.983 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Mauritius | 58.759 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Madagascar | 36.247 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Niger | 8.871 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Malawi | 4.108 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Suriname | 47,351.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Zambia | 11,792.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Zimbabwe | 9,186.85 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Venezuela | 7,049.87 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Uruguay | 5,406.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Tajikistan | 4,973.08 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Sweden | 4,095.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Uganda | 3,978.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Tanzania | 3,539.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | United States | 2,765.48 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Turkey | 2,320.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Thailand | 1,333.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Spain | 1,262.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Turkmenistan | 1,207.17 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Uzbekistan | 957.647 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Syrian Arab Republic | 955.881 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Ukraine | 906.368 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | South Africa | 675.419 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Vietnam | 577.939 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Switzerland | 478.081 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Togo | 406.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | South Korea | 358.956 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Sao Tome and Principe | 293.825 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Slovakia | 289.862 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Sri Lanka | 255.958 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Tunisia | 229.436 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Samoa | 57.75 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Trinidad and Tobago | 55.474 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sierra Leone | 52.719 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 48.499 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | 28.989 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | United Kingdom | 90.883 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Bolivia | 72.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Lebanon | 56.558 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Bangladesh | 53.821 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Guatemala | 45.911 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Germany | 41.268 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Haiti | 40.028 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Oman | 34.388 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Guinea | 32.266 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Yemen | 25.225 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Hungary | 24.797 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Eritrea | 23.047 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Jordan | 22.274 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Singapore | 21.915 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Saint Lucia | 17.822 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | United Arab Emirates | 17.594 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Slovenia | 16.849 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Belgium | 14.283 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 12.943 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Nepal | 3.928 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Benin | 3.855 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Denmark | 3.842 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo | 3.367 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Jamaica | 2.202 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.24 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Grenada | 0.213 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Cambodia | 0.108 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Guinea-Bissau
- #158
Cabo Verde
- #157
Bhutan
- #156
Belize
- #155
Cambodia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1994, the measure of dam capacity per capita shed light on the critical state of water resource management across the globe. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, reveals how much water storage is available to each person in a country, offering a lens through which to examine the sustainability and development impacts of water management. Understanding dam capacity is imperative for addressing water security challenges, which are crucial for supporting agriculture, industries, and communities worldwide.
Understanding the Global Landscape of Dam Capacity in 1994
The data for 1994 presents a broad spectrum of dam capacity per capita across 157 countries, with a staggering maximum of 47,351.3 cubic meters per inhabitant in Suriname, contrasting sharply with several nations, including Guinea-Bissau and Cabo Verde, reporting a value of zero. The average global dam capacity stood at 1,709.56 cubic meters per person, while the median was significantly lower at 287.42 cubic meters, highlighting the disparity in water storage capabilities.
Suriname’s exceptional capacity can be attributed to its substantial hydroelectric infrastructure, which supports a small population, thereby inflating the per capita figure. In contrast, countries with minimal or no dam capacity, like Guinea-Bissau, face challenges related to infrastructure development and geographic limitations. These differences underscore the critical role of both natural endowments and policy decisions in shaping water resource management.
Regional Disparities and Their Underlying Causes
Analyzing the dam capacity per capita reveals fascinating regional disparities. In North America, Canada stands out with 28,820.1 cubic meters per inhabitant, primarily due to its vast geographic area and abundant freshwater resources, which have historically facilitated extensive dam construction. Meanwhile, Norway’s capacity of 6,727.34 cubic meters reflects its reliance on hydropower as a primary energy source, aligning with its commitment to sustainable energy practices.
In stark contrast, many African countries, such as Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda, exhibit negligible dam capacities. The underlying causes for these disparities often include a combination of economic constraints, political instability, and a lack of investment in infrastructure. Moreover, the geographical terrain and climate variability in these regions further complicate water storage solutions.
Yearly Fluctuations and Their Implications
The 1994 data also highlights notable yearly fluctuations, with countries like Tajikistan experiencing an impressive 88.6% increase in dam capacity per capita. This surge can be attributed to new dam projects and improvements in water management strategies. Argentina and Vietnam also saw significant increases, reflecting efforts to bolster water security through enhanced infrastructure.
Conversely, countries such as Iraq and Mozambique saw declines in capacity, with Iraq experiencing a 4.7% decrease. These reductions may be linked to factors such as prolonged droughts, maintenance challenges, or shifts in water usage policies. Such fluctuations underscore the dynamic nature of water resource management and the need for adaptive strategies to ensure long-term sustainability.
Policy Influence and Sustainability Trends
Policy decisions play a pivotal role in shaping the dam capacity per capita across nations. Countries with proactive water management policies often exhibit higher dam capacities, as seen in Canada and Norway. These nations prioritize investments in infrastructure and consider environmental impacts, aligning with global sustainability goals.
On the other hand, countries with lower capacities may struggle with policy implementation due to economic or political challenges. International collaborations and financial assistance can be instrumental in improving these situations, aiding in the development of infrastructure and the adoption of sustainable practices.
The Future Outlook for Dam Capacity
As the world continues to grapple with climate change and increasing water demands, the measure of dam capacity per capita will remain a crucial indicator of water resource management effectiveness. Nations will need to innovate and adapt their strategies to mitigate the impacts of climate variability and ensure equitable water distribution.
The 1994 data provides a snapshot of a world at a crossroads, with varying degrees of preparedness for future water challenges. Enhancing dam capacity, particularly in regions with current deficits, will be vital for achieving sustainable development and ensuring water security for all inhabitants in the decades to come.
Insights by country
India
In 1994, India ranked 91st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 220.11 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure development in water resource management, essential for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including India's vast population, which was approximately 900 million in 1994, placing significant pressure on available water resources. Additionally, India's diverse climatic conditions and varying geographical features have influenced the distribution and construction of dams across the country.
Notably, the development of dam infrastructure is crucial for mitigating issues related to water scarcity and flood control. As of 1994, India was increasingly investing in hydropower projects, which not only contribute to energy needs but also enhance water storage capacity, crucial for agricultural sustainability.
Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea ranked 159th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1994, with a value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of large-scale water storage infrastructure relative to the country's population, which can have profound implications for water resource management and development.
The absence of dam capacity can be attributed to various factors, including the country's challenging geographical terrain, which consists of mountainous regions and numerous islands, making the construction of large dams logistically difficult. Additionally, Papua New Guinea has faced economic constraints and prioritization of other infrastructural needs over water storage solutions.
Interestingly, the lack of dam infrastructure can exacerbate issues related to water supply, especially during droughts or in rural areas where water accessibility is critical for agriculture and daily living. This situation highlights the broader challenges faced by developing nations in managing natural resources effectively for their populations.
Angola
In 1994, Angola had a dam capacity per capita of 337.38 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 74th out of 164 countries. This statistic highlights the country's relatively moderate water storage capacity in relation to its population, which was significant for a nation still recovering from the impacts of a prolonged civil war that began in 1975 and lasted until 2002.
The capacity of dams in Angola is influenced by several factors, including the country's geographical diversity, the presence of major rivers such as the Congo and the Zambezi, and the historical development of its water infrastructure. However, issues such as underinvestment, lack of maintenance, and political instability have hindered the optimal development and management of such resources.
In a broader context, Angola's dam capacity per capita is essential for understanding the country's potential for hydropower generation and irrigation, which are critical for economic development and food security. The statistic also reflects on the ongoing challenges that Angola faces in terms of water resource management and the need for improved infrastructure to support its growing population.
South Korea
In 1994, South Korea ranked 72nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 358.956 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is crucial for supporting its industrial economy and urban population.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to South Korea's geography, characterized by mountainous terrain and significant rainfall, necessitating the construction of reservoirs for water supply and flood control. Additionally, rapid industrialization during the late 20th century increased the demand for reliable water resources for both domestic and industrial use.
As of the early 1990s, South Korea was undergoing transformative economic growth, which often leads to increased infrastructure development. This trend is consistent with other countries that prioritize water management to sustain economic expansion and ensure water security for their populations.
China
In 1994, China ranked 80th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 281.249 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the extensive network of dams and water management systems that China has developed to support its large population and agricultural needs.
The significant dam capacity per capita can be attributed to China's rapid industrialization and urbanization during the late 20th century, which necessitated comprehensive water resource management to sustain economic growth and ensure water availability for both domestic and agricultural use. Major projects, such as the construction of the Three Gorges Dam, highlight the country's commitment to enhancing its infrastructure to support its vast population.
Additionally, China's focus on hydroelectric power generation has played a crucial role in increasing dam capacities, making it one of the leading countries in renewable energy production. By 1994, these developments were already paving the way for China's future advancements in water management and energy sustainability.
Egypt
In 1994, Egypt ranked 29th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 2616.4 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects Egypt's significant investment in water management infrastructure, particularly given its reliance on the Nile River as a primary water source for agriculture, drinking, and industry.
The high dam capacity per capita indicates a robust system for water storage and management, which is crucial for a country that faces challenges such as arid climate conditions and population growth. Factors contributing to this statistic include the construction of major dams, like the Aswan High Dam, which has played a pivotal role in regulating water supply, controlling floods, and generating hydroelectric power.
Additionally, Egypt's strategic focus on water resource management has implications for agricultural productivity and economic stability, making the dam capacity an important statistic in understanding the nation's infrastructure and its socio-economic context. As of 1994, the effective management of water resources was essential for sustaining the livelihoods of millions in a predominantly desert environment.
Lithuania
Lithuania ranked 102nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1994, with a capacity of 135.49 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s infrastructure for water management and its ability to harness hydropower resources during a period of significant transition following the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Lithuania's geographical landscape, which consists of numerous rivers and lakes, but also reflects the challenges faced in developing robust water management systems during the early post-independence years. The emphasis on improving energy independence and sustainable practices has influenced the water infrastructure development in Lithuania.
In comparison to other European nations, Lithuania's dam capacity per capita indicates a potential for growth in the hydropower sector, as many countries in the region have invested heavily in renewable energy sources. This statistic underscores the importance of continued investment in water management and hydropower as Lithuania progresses towards more sustainable energy solutions.
Afghanistan
In 1994, Afghanistan had a dam capacity per capita of 123.625 cubic meters, ranking it 105th out of 164 countries. This statistic reflects the nation's limited water resource management and infrastructure development, particularly in the context of ongoing conflict and instability during that period.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's challenging geography, historical neglect of water infrastructure, and the impacts of prolonged civil strife which hindered investment in essential services. Additionally, Afghanistan's agriculture, which relies heavily on irrigation, faced significant challenges due to the lack of reliable water storage facilities.
Interestingly, Afghanistan's water resource management is critical, as the country is home to several major rivers, including the Helmand and Kabul Rivers, which are vital for its agricultural output. Improving dam capacity is essential for addressing water scarcity and enhancing food security in the region.
Samoa
Samoa ranked 118th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1994. The country's dam capacity per capita was measured at 57.7504 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting the availability of water resources in relation to its population size.
This statistic indicates a moderate level of water storage infrastructure for a small island nation. Factors contributing to this capacity include the geographical features of Samoa, which consists of volcanic islands that may have limited space for large reservoirs, as well as the reliance on rainfall for freshwater supply.
Additionally, the development of dam capacity can be influenced by economic factors, governmental investment in infrastructure, and the prioritization of water management strategies. In comparison, larger or more industrialized nations often exhibit significantly higher per capita dam capacities due to extensive water management systems.
Armenia
In 1994, Armenia ranked 69th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 412.205 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's considerable water resource management capabilities in the post-Soviet era, as Armenia faced various challenges in infrastructure and development during this transitional period.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Armenia's geographical features, which include mountainous terrain and significant water resources from rivers and reservoirs. Additionally, the establishment of various dams and hydroelectric plants has been crucial for the country’s energy generation and irrigation needs, especially considering its predominantly agricultural economy.
Furthermore, Armenia's focus on enhancing its water management systems has been essential for addressing water scarcity issues and supporting rural livelihoods. In comparison, other countries with similar geographical challenges often struggle with water management, emphasizing the importance of this statistic in understanding Armenia's resource situation during the mid-1990s.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data