Dam capacity per capita 1989

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
30,507.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Australia flag
Australia
4,580.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,303.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
3,177.87 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,418.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
1,236.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Chile flag
Chile
855.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
640.194 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Cuba flag
Cuba
434.988 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Angola flag
Angola
397.756 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Austria flag
Austria
277.085 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Algeria flag
Algeria
177.21 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
169.192 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
79.289 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,106.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
725.394 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Botswana flag
Botswana
353.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
351.941 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
China flag
China
281.477 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
245.569 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
244.352 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
181.457 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
75.406 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
59.187 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
346.589 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.563 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Benin flag
Benin
4.588 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo flag
Congo
3.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Ghana flag
Ghana
9,895.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Iraq flag
Iraq
8,741.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Iceland flag
Iceland
7,538.43 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Finland flag
Finland
3,747.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,965.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Honduras flag
Honduras
1,182.53 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,071.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Greece flag
Greece
1,064.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
732.028 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iran flag
Iran
305.83 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
301.558 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Ireland flag
Ireland
247.503 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
India flag
India
236.111 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Gabon flag
Gabon
229.852 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
France flag
France
174.669 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Fiji flag
Fiji
173.557 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
52.657 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Laos flag
Laos
1,672.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,010.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
490.243 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Italy flag
Italy
153.299 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Japan flag
Japan
117.841 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
98.134 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Liberia flag
Liberia
94.763 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
62.406 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
52.546 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Haiti flag
Haiti
44.231 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Germany flag
Germany
40.521 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Guinea flag
Guinea
38.129 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Jordan flag
Jordan
30.332 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.646 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.897 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.182 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.307 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
89.776 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
7,870.56 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Norway flag
Norway
6,836.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
5,863.08 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
5,743.97 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
5,065.56 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Panama flag
Panama
3,622.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mali flag
Mali
1,512.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
1,285.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,236.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
North Korea flag
North Korea
857.818 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Portugal flag
Portugal
691.855 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
618.855 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Namibia flag
Namibia
516.878 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
458.715 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Romania flag
Romania
457.456 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Morocco flag
Morocco
448.044 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
262.736 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
147.338 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
42.158 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Malawi flag
Malawi
4.55 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
246.533 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Peru flag
Peru
226.043 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
117.692 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
91.348 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
62.613 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Philippines flag
Philippines
89.006 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Poland flag
Poland
59.323 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Oman flag
Oman
22.497 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Niger flag
Niger
10.376 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Nepal flag
Nepal
4.476 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
19.046 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Suriname flag
Suriname
48,970.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Zambia flag
Zambia
13,325.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
10,085.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
7,915.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,558.09 cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Uganda flag
Uganda
4,702.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,234.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
4,095.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
United States flag
United States
2,910.86 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,082.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Togo flag
Togo
442.258 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
325.057 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
South Korea flag
South Korea
282.228 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
258.722 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
237.885 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
91.576 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
59.325 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
54.536 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Senegal flag
Senegal
33.324 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Yemen flag
Yemen
30.405 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Singapore flag
Singapore
25.488 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
13.677 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,431.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,423.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Spain flag
Spain
1,217.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
South Africa flag
South Africa
746.014 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
502.949 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
57.563 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
447.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
163
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
8.918 cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Australia flagAustralia
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  5. #5Cameroon flagCameroon
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Chile flagChile
  8. #8Costa Rica flagCosta Rica
  9. #9Cuba flagCuba
  10. #10Angola flagAngola

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  2. #163United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  3. #162Vietnam flagVietnam
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  7. #158Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  8. #157Switzerland flagSwitzerland
  9. #156Sudan flagSudan
  10. #155State of Palestine flagState of Palestine

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

Understanding Dam Capacity Per Capita in 1989: A Global Perspective

In 1989, the metric of dam capacity per capita provided a crucial lens through which to evaluate water management strategies across the globe. This statistic, measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, reflects the availability of water storage resources for each individual in a country. The importance of this measure extends to assessing water security, supporting agricultural and industrial activities, and enhancing community welfare. As water becomes an ever-scarcer resource, understanding the distribution and management of dams is vital for sustainable development and environmental stewardship.

Global Statistical Summary of 1989

In 1989, data was available for 131 countries, offering a comprehensive overview of global dam capacity per capita. The average dam capacity stood at 1923.69 cubic meters per inhabitant, with a striking variation between countries. Suriname led the world with an exceptional 48,970.5 cubic meters per capita, illustrating its robust infrastructure and water management strategies. Countries like Canada (30,507.3) and Zambia (13,325.9) also demonstrated significant water storage capacity. On the contrary, several nations, including Rwanda, Papua New Guinea, and Cambodia, reported no measurable capacity, highlighting challenges in water resource management.

Regional Disparities in Water Storage

The disparities in dam capacity per capita in 1989 reflected broader regional differences in geography, development, and policy. In North America, Canada's substantial capacity underscored its abundance of natural water resources and extensive dam networks. Meanwhile, African nations displayed a wide range of capacities; Zambia and Zimbabwe showed relatively high figures, indicating advanced infrastructure development, whereas Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo faced limitations, influencing their agricultural and industrial capabilities.

Year-Over-Year Shifts and Influences

Examining changes from the previous year reveals both positive and negative trends. Countries like Spain, which experienced an increase of 104.45 cubic meters per inhabitant (a 9.4% rise), and Argentina, with a 75.99 increase (2.4%), showcased improvements in water management and infrastructure expansion. Conversely, significant decreases were observed in top-performing countries such as Suriname, which saw a reduction of 752.70 cubic meters per inhabitant, and Canada, with a decline of 482.60. These decreases, although small in percentage terms, highlight the challenges of maintaining or expanding dam capacity in the face of changing environmental and economic conditions.

Economic and Environmental Implications

The dam capacity per capita metric carries profound implications for both economic development and environmental sustainability. Countries with high capacities, such as Suriname and Canada, benefit from enhanced agricultural productivity and industrial growth due to secure water supplies. However, maintaining such capacities demands balancing environmental conservation with economic needs, a challenge that nations with declining capacities must navigate carefully. On the other hand, countries with minimal or zero capacities face potential setbacks in economic progress and require strategic investments in infrastructure and technology to bolster their water security.

Policy Considerations and Future Directions

Ensuring equitable and sustainable water resource management remains a critical policy challenge for many nations. Policymakers must address the disparities highlighted by the dam capacity per capita metric by investing in infrastructure, fostering regional cooperation, and integrating sustainable practices into water management strategies. As the pressures of climate change and population growth intensify, countries will need to innovate and adapt to safeguard their water resources, ensuring they can meet both current and future demands.

In conclusion, the 1989 dam capacity per capita statistics underscore the importance of robust water management systems. They highlight the need for strategic planning and international cooperation to achieve water security and foster sustainable development globally. Understanding these metrics allows countries to benchmark their progress and plan effectively for the challenges ahead.

Insights by country

1

Luxembourg

In 1989, Luxembourg ranked 83rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 147.338 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for a nation with a relatively small geographical area yet a significant industrial base.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Luxembourg's extensive network of rivers and its commitment to sustainable water resources management. Additionally, the country's economic prosperity allows for greater investment in infrastructure, including dams, which support both domestic water supply and hydroelectric power generation.

Interestingly, Luxembourg is situated in a region with a temperate maritime climate, which influences its water resources. The country's ability to harness and manage its water supply effectively is essential not only for its population but also for its industries, including banking and steel production, which require substantial water usage.

2

New Zealand

In 1989, New Zealand ranked 14th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 5065.56 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects the country's extensive hydropower infrastructure and its commitment to renewable energy sources.

The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to New Zealand's diverse geography, which includes numerous rivers and lakes suitable for hydroelectric power generation. The country has invested in harnessing its natural water resources to produce electricity, providing a sustainable energy solution while also managing water supply for agricultural and urban needs.

Additionally, New Zealand's focus on environmental conservation and sustainability has led to stringent regulations governing water management, further supporting the effective use of dam infrastructure. In comparison, the global average for dam capacity per capita varies significantly, highlighting New Zealand's position as a leader in this area.

3

Burkina Faso

In 1989, Burkina Faso ranked 60th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded capacity of 346.589 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage its water resources amidst a challenging climate and geographical landscape.

The considerable dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Burkina Faso's reliance on irrigation for agriculture, as well as the need for water storage during dry seasons. The construction of dams has been crucial for supporting both agricultural productivity and the provision of potable water to its population, which has been essential in a nation characterized by periodic droughts and water scarcity.

Additionally, this figure highlights the importance of infrastructure development in Burkina Faso, which has often faced challenges related to economic constraints and political instability. The management of water resources through dams not only aids in agricultural sustainability but also contributes to the resilience of the country against climate variability.

4

Poland

In 1989, Poland ranked 97th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 59.323 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management and infrastructure capabilities during a period of significant political and economic transformation.

The relatively moderate capacity per capita can be attributed to Poland's geographical features, including its numerous rivers and lakes, as well as historical investment in hydroelectric power and irrigation systems. However, the capacity also reflects the challenges Poland faced in upgrading its infrastructure during the transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented system.

Additionally, Poland's water management strategies were influenced by environmental considerations, industrial needs, and agricultural demands, all of which are critical in determining dam capacities. As of the late 1980s, Poland was still recovering from the impacts of the previous regime's policies, which may have limited advancements in water resource development.

5

Lithuania

In 1989, Lithuania ranked 145th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population at the time.

The absence of recorded dam capacity suggests that Lithuania may not have had sufficient investment in hydraulic infrastructure, which can be crucial for managing water resources, particularly in the context of agricultural needs and flood management. Additionally, the political landscape during the late 1980s, characterized by the transition from Soviet rule, may have diverted resources away from infrastructure development.

Overall, the low dam capacity per capita in Lithuania highlights the challenges faced in resource management during a period of significant political and economic change. Relatedly, it reflects broader issues regarding water security and environmental management that many post-Soviet states grappled with during their transition to independence.

6

Paraguay

In 1989, Paraguay ranked 11th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 5,863.08 cubic meters of dam capacity per inhabitant. This considerable figure reflects the country's extensive investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, particularly the Itaipu Dam, one of the largest in the world, which significantly contributes to Paraguay's energy production and export capabilities.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Paraguay's geographical features, such as abundant river systems, and its strategic focus on renewable energy sources. The country has harnessed its water resources effectively, leading to a robust hydroelectric sector that not only supports domestic needs but also allows for substantial energy exports to neighboring countries.

Additionally, Paraguay's favorable climatic conditions and commitment to sustainable development have further enhanced its hydroelectric potential. This capacity for renewable energy has positioned Paraguay as a leading example in Latin America for sustainable energy production and usage.

7

Argentina

In 1989, Argentina ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3303.45 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high figure reflects the country's extensive investment in hydraulic infrastructure and the development of water management systems to support both agricultural and urban needs.

The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Argentina's diverse geography, which includes major river systems such as the Paraná and the Colorado, providing ample opportunities for dam construction. Additionally, the country's agricultural sector relies heavily on irrigation, necessitating significant water storage capabilities to sustain crop production, especially in arid regions.

Furthermore, this statistic highlights the importance of water resources in Argentina's economy, as well as the government's efforts to ensure water security amidst growing population demands. As a related fact, the country continues to prioritize sustainable water management practices to address challenges posed by climate change and urbanization.

8

Malta

In 1989, Malta ranked 147th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant limitation in Malta's water storage capacity relative to its population size, reflecting the challenges faced by the country in managing its water resources.

The low dam capacity per capita in Malta can be attributed to its geographical and climatic conditions, which include a small land area and a Mediterranean climate characterized by hot, dry summers. These factors limit the potential for substantial water reservoir construction. Additionally, Malta's reliance on desalination plants for potable water has further influenced its water management strategies, focusing less on traditional dam-based storage.

Interestingly, Malta's situation underscores broader regional water scarcity issues in the Mediterranean, where many countries face similar challenges. As a member of the European Union, Malta has engaged in various initiatives to improve water conservation and management practices, which are crucial for its sustainability given the ongoing impacts of climate change.

9

Haiti

In 1989, Haiti ranked 103rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 44.2311 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure for water management and hydropower generation, which are critical for supporting agricultural activities and providing clean drinking water.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including Haiti's economic challenges, political instability, and environmental degradation. These issues have hindered investment in infrastructure projects that could enhance water storage and management capabilities.

Additionally, Haiti's geographic vulnerability to natural disasters, such as hurricanes and earthquakes, often exacerbates the challenges associated with water resource management, leading to further strain on existing dam facilities and the overall water supply system.

10

Iraq

Iraq ranked 6th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1989. The country exhibited a significant dam capacity of 8,741.95 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its extensive water management infrastructure and the strategic importance of water resources in the region.

This high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Iraq's geographical position, which encompasses major rivers such as the Tigris and Euphrates, coupled with its historical emphasis on agricultural development and irrigation projects. The establishment of various dams and reservoirs was essential for supporting the agriculture-driven economy and ensuring water availability for its population.

Additionally, this statistic highlights the importance of water resource management in Iraq, particularly considering the country’s arid climate and the challenges posed by fluctuating rainfall patterns. The high dam capacity also indicates potential for hydroelectric power generation and flood control, which were critical components of Iraq's infrastructure strategy during that period.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts