Dam capacity per capita 1989
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 30,507.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Australia | 4,580.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 3,303.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3,177.87 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Cameroon | 1,418.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 1,236.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Chile | 855.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Costa Rica | 640.194 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Cuba | 434.988 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Angola | 397.756 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Austria | 277.085 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Algeria | 177.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Afghanistan | 169.192 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Antigua and Barbuda | 79.289 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Brazil | 4,106.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Bulgaria | 725.394 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Botswana | 353.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Cyprus | 351.941 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | China | 281.477 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Dominican Republic | 245.569 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Colombia | 244.352 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Brunei Darussalam | 181.457 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Bolivia | 75.406 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Bangladesh | 59.187 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Burkina Faso | 346.589 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 14.563 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Benin | 4.588 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo | 3.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Ghana | 9,895.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Iraq | 8,741.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Iceland | 7,538.43 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Finland | 3,747.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Egypt | 2,965.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Honduras | 1,182.53 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Guyana | 1,071.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Greece | 1,064.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | El Salvador | 732.028 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Iran | 305.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Eswatini | 301.558 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Ireland | 247.503 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | India | 236.111 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Gabon | 229.852 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | France | 174.669 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Fiji | 173.557 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Ecuador | 52.657 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Laos | 1,672.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Kenya | 1,010.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lesotho | 490.243 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Italy | 153.299 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Japan | 117.841 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Indonesia | 98.134 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Liberia | 94.763 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Lebanon | 62.406 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Guatemala | 52.546 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Haiti | 44.231 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Germany | 40.521 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Guinea | 38.129 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Jordan | 30.332 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Hungary | 24.646 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Denmark | 3.897 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Grenada | 0.182 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Jamaica | 2.307 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 89.776 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 7,870.56 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Norway | 6,836.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Paraguay | 5,863.08 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Mozambique | 5,743.97 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | New Zealand | 5,065.56 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Panama | 3,622.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Mali | 1,512.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Malaysia | 1,285.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Mexico | 1,236.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | North Korea | 857.818 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Portugal | 691.855 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Netherlands | 618.855 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Namibia | 516.878 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Nigeria | 458.715 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Romania | 457.456 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Morocco | 448.044 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Mauritania | 262.736 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Luxembourg | 147.338 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Madagascar | 42.158 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Malawi | 4.55 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Pakistan | 246.533 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Peru | 226.043 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Mongolia | 117.692 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Myanmar | 91.348 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Mauritius | 62.613 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Philippines | 89.006 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Poland | 59.323 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Oman | 22.497 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Niger | 10.376 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Nepal | 4.476 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Saint Lucia | 19.046 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Suriname | 48,970.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Zambia | 13,325.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Zimbabwe | 10,085.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Venezuela | 7,915.67 cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Uruguay | 5,558.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Uganda | 4,702.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Sweden | 4,234.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Tanzania | 4,095.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | United States | 2,910.86 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,082.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Togo | 442.258 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sao Tome and Principe | 325.057 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | South Korea | 282.228 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Sri Lanka | 258.722 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Tunisia | 237.885 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | United Kingdom | 91.576 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Saudi Arabia | 59.325 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Sierra Leone | 54.536 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Senegal | 33.324 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Yemen | 30.405 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Singapore | 25.488 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 13.677 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Thailand | 1,431.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Turkey | 1,423.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Spain | 1,217.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | South Africa | 746.014 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Switzerland | 502.949 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Trinidad and Tobago | 57.563 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Vietnam | 447.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | United Arab Emirates | 8.918 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Uzbekistan
- #163
United Arab Emirates
- #162
Vietnam
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Trinidad and Tobago
- #158
Tajikistan
- #157
Switzerland
- #156
Sudan
- #155
State of Palestine
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Understanding Dam Capacity Per Capita in 1989: A Global Perspective
In 1989, the metric of dam capacity per capita provided a crucial lens through which to evaluate water management strategies across the globe. This statistic, measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, reflects the availability of water storage resources for each individual in a country. The importance of this measure extends to assessing water security, supporting agricultural and industrial activities, and enhancing community welfare. As water becomes an ever-scarcer resource, understanding the distribution and management of dams is vital for sustainable development and environmental stewardship.
Global Statistical Summary of 1989
In 1989, data was available for 131 countries, offering a comprehensive overview of global dam capacity per capita. The average dam capacity stood at 1923.69 cubic meters per inhabitant, with a striking variation between countries. Suriname led the world with an exceptional 48,970.5 cubic meters per capita, illustrating its robust infrastructure and water management strategies. Countries like Canada (30,507.3) and Zambia (13,325.9) also demonstrated significant water storage capacity. On the contrary, several nations, including Rwanda, Papua New Guinea, and Cambodia, reported no measurable capacity, highlighting challenges in water resource management.
Regional Disparities in Water Storage
The disparities in dam capacity per capita in 1989 reflected broader regional differences in geography, development, and policy. In North America, Canada's substantial capacity underscored its abundance of natural water resources and extensive dam networks. Meanwhile, African nations displayed a wide range of capacities; Zambia and Zimbabwe showed relatively high figures, indicating advanced infrastructure development, whereas Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo faced limitations, influencing their agricultural and industrial capabilities.
Year-Over-Year Shifts and Influences
Examining changes from the previous year reveals both positive and negative trends. Countries like Spain, which experienced an increase of 104.45 cubic meters per inhabitant (a 9.4% rise), and Argentina, with a 75.99 increase (2.4%), showcased improvements in water management and infrastructure expansion. Conversely, significant decreases were observed in top-performing countries such as Suriname, which saw a reduction of 752.70 cubic meters per inhabitant, and Canada, with a decline of 482.60. These decreases, although small in percentage terms, highlight the challenges of maintaining or expanding dam capacity in the face of changing environmental and economic conditions.
Economic and Environmental Implications
The dam capacity per capita metric carries profound implications for both economic development and environmental sustainability. Countries with high capacities, such as Suriname and Canada, benefit from enhanced agricultural productivity and industrial growth due to secure water supplies. However, maintaining such capacities demands balancing environmental conservation with economic needs, a challenge that nations with declining capacities must navigate carefully. On the other hand, countries with minimal or zero capacities face potential setbacks in economic progress and require strategic investments in infrastructure and technology to bolster their water security.
Policy Considerations and Future Directions
Ensuring equitable and sustainable water resource management remains a critical policy challenge for many nations. Policymakers must address the disparities highlighted by the dam capacity per capita metric by investing in infrastructure, fostering regional cooperation, and integrating sustainable practices into water management strategies. As the pressures of climate change and population growth intensify, countries will need to innovate and adapt to safeguard their water resources, ensuring they can meet both current and future demands.
In conclusion, the 1989 dam capacity per capita statistics underscore the importance of robust water management systems. They highlight the need for strategic planning and international cooperation to achieve water security and foster sustainable development globally. Understanding these metrics allows countries to benchmark their progress and plan effectively for the challenges ahead.
Insights by country
Luxembourg
In 1989, Luxembourg ranked 83rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 147.338 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for a nation with a relatively small geographical area yet a significant industrial base.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Luxembourg's extensive network of rivers and its commitment to sustainable water resources management. Additionally, the country's economic prosperity allows for greater investment in infrastructure, including dams, which support both domestic water supply and hydroelectric power generation.
Interestingly, Luxembourg is situated in a region with a temperate maritime climate, which influences its water resources. The country's ability to harness and manage its water supply effectively is essential not only for its population but also for its industries, including banking and steel production, which require substantial water usage.
New Zealand
In 1989, New Zealand ranked 14th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 5065.56 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects the country's extensive hydropower infrastructure and its commitment to renewable energy sources.
The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to New Zealand's diverse geography, which includes numerous rivers and lakes suitable for hydroelectric power generation. The country has invested in harnessing its natural water resources to produce electricity, providing a sustainable energy solution while also managing water supply for agricultural and urban needs.
Additionally, New Zealand's focus on environmental conservation and sustainability has led to stringent regulations governing water management, further supporting the effective use of dam infrastructure. In comparison, the global average for dam capacity per capita varies significantly, highlighting New Zealand's position as a leader in this area.
Burkina Faso
In 1989, Burkina Faso ranked 60th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded capacity of 346.589 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage its water resources amidst a challenging climate and geographical landscape.
The considerable dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Burkina Faso's reliance on irrigation for agriculture, as well as the need for water storage during dry seasons. The construction of dams has been crucial for supporting both agricultural productivity and the provision of potable water to its population, which has been essential in a nation characterized by periodic droughts and water scarcity.
Additionally, this figure highlights the importance of infrastructure development in Burkina Faso, which has often faced challenges related to economic constraints and political instability. The management of water resources through dams not only aids in agricultural sustainability but also contributes to the resilience of the country against climate variability.
Poland
In 1989, Poland ranked 97th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 59.323 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management and infrastructure capabilities during a period of significant political and economic transformation.
The relatively moderate capacity per capita can be attributed to Poland's geographical features, including its numerous rivers and lakes, as well as historical investment in hydroelectric power and irrigation systems. However, the capacity also reflects the challenges Poland faced in upgrading its infrastructure during the transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented system.
Additionally, Poland's water management strategies were influenced by environmental considerations, industrial needs, and agricultural demands, all of which are critical in determining dam capacities. As of the late 1980s, Poland was still recovering from the impacts of the previous regime's policies, which may have limited advancements in water resource development.
Lithuania
In 1989, Lithuania ranked 145th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population at the time.
The absence of recorded dam capacity suggests that Lithuania may not have had sufficient investment in hydraulic infrastructure, which can be crucial for managing water resources, particularly in the context of agricultural needs and flood management. Additionally, the political landscape during the late 1980s, characterized by the transition from Soviet rule, may have diverted resources away from infrastructure development.
Overall, the low dam capacity per capita in Lithuania highlights the challenges faced in resource management during a period of significant political and economic change. Relatedly, it reflects broader issues regarding water security and environmental management that many post-Soviet states grappled with during their transition to independence.
Paraguay
In 1989, Paraguay ranked 11th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 5,863.08 cubic meters of dam capacity per inhabitant. This considerable figure reflects the country's extensive investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, particularly the Itaipu Dam, one of the largest in the world, which significantly contributes to Paraguay's energy production and export capabilities.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Paraguay's geographical features, such as abundant river systems, and its strategic focus on renewable energy sources. The country has harnessed its water resources effectively, leading to a robust hydroelectric sector that not only supports domestic needs but also allows for substantial energy exports to neighboring countries.
Additionally, Paraguay's favorable climatic conditions and commitment to sustainable development have further enhanced its hydroelectric potential. This capacity for renewable energy has positioned Paraguay as a leading example in Latin America for sustainable energy production and usage.
Argentina
In 1989, Argentina ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3303.45 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high figure reflects the country's extensive investment in hydraulic infrastructure and the development of water management systems to support both agricultural and urban needs.
The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Argentina's diverse geography, which includes major river systems such as the Paraná and the Colorado, providing ample opportunities for dam construction. Additionally, the country's agricultural sector relies heavily on irrigation, necessitating significant water storage capabilities to sustain crop production, especially in arid regions.
Furthermore, this statistic highlights the importance of water resources in Argentina's economy, as well as the government's efforts to ensure water security amidst growing population demands. As a related fact, the country continues to prioritize sustainable water management practices to address challenges posed by climate change and urbanization.
Malta
In 1989, Malta ranked 147th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant limitation in Malta's water storage capacity relative to its population size, reflecting the challenges faced by the country in managing its water resources.
The low dam capacity per capita in Malta can be attributed to its geographical and climatic conditions, which include a small land area and a Mediterranean climate characterized by hot, dry summers. These factors limit the potential for substantial water reservoir construction. Additionally, Malta's reliance on desalination plants for potable water has further influenced its water management strategies, focusing less on traditional dam-based storage.
Interestingly, Malta's situation underscores broader regional water scarcity issues in the Mediterranean, where many countries face similar challenges. As a member of the European Union, Malta has engaged in various initiatives to improve water conservation and management practices, which are crucial for its sustainability given the ongoing impacts of climate change.
Haiti
In 1989, Haiti ranked 103rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 44.2311 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure for water management and hydropower generation, which are critical for supporting agricultural activities and providing clean drinking water.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including Haiti's economic challenges, political instability, and environmental degradation. These issues have hindered investment in infrastructure projects that could enhance water storage and management capabilities.
Additionally, Haiti's geographic vulnerability to natural disasters, such as hurricanes and earthquakes, often exacerbates the challenges associated with water resource management, leading to further strain on existing dam facilities and the overall water supply system.
Iraq
Iraq ranked 6th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1989. The country exhibited a significant dam capacity of 8,741.95 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its extensive water management infrastructure and the strategic importance of water resources in the region.
This high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Iraq's geographical position, which encompasses major rivers such as the Tigris and Euphrates, coupled with its historical emphasis on agricultural development and irrigation projects. The establishment of various dams and reservoirs was essential for supporting the agriculture-driven economy and ensuring water availability for its population.
Additionally, this statistic highlights the importance of water resource management in Iraq, particularly considering the country’s arid climate and the challenges posed by fluctuating rainfall patterns. The high dam capacity also indicates potential for hydroelectric power generation and flood control, which were critical components of Iraq's infrastructure strategy during that period.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data