Dam capacity per capita 1977

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
4,269.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
3,933.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,511.38 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
609.335 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Angola flag
Angola
590.564 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
342.866 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Austria flag
Austria
242.886 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
150.591 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Algeria flag
Algeria
107.943 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
78.623 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
79.116 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
28,704.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,062.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Chile flag
Chile
878.194 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
575.973 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Botswana flag
Botswana
381.203 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Cuba flag
Cuba
364.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
China flag
China
277.981 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
265.913 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
224.447 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
133.492 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
67.998 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
64.767 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
53.861 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
16.735 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
6.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Congo flag
Congo
5.271 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2.182 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Egypt flag
Egypt
4,127.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
813.483 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
134.904 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
27.329 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ghana flag
Ghana
13,578.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
10,307.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iceland flag
Iceland
6,198.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Finland flag
Finland
3,925.86 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Laos flag
Laos
2,253.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,398.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Greece flag
Greece
1,037.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
671.409 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Iran flag
Iran
444.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Ireland flag
Ireland
265.12 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Guyana flag
Guyana
263.823 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
India flag
India
234.541 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
France flag
France
169.379 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Italy flag
Italy
142.473 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Liberia flag
Liberia
135.106 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Japan flag
Japan
107.121 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
79.648 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Haiti flag
Haiti
56.043 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
55.286 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Guinea flag
Guinea
49.363 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Germany flag
Germany
37.733 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Honduras flag
Honduras
7.412 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Jordan flag
Jordan
3.269 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.632 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Hungary flag
Hungary
2.617 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.128 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.113 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
71.642 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
10,683.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
7,088.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Norway flag
Norway
5,292.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
5,061.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Panama flag
Panama
4,685.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
3,016.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,386.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,019.41 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Namibia flag
Namibia
641.636 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Portugal flag
Portugal
617.853 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
608.238 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
495.515 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
465.368 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Morocco flag
Morocco
365.045 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
356.621 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Romania flag
Romania
272.205 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Peru flag
Peru
247.426 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
158.605 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
149.722 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
76.896 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
69.035 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
60.015 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Mali flag
Mali
24.679 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Malawi flag
Malawi
7.436 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Philippines flag
Philippines
88.262 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Poland flag
Poland
56.783 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Niger flag
Niger
3.981 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
22.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
54.456 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
51,939 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
18,144 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
15,269.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
6,472.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
5,820.16 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,284.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
3,903.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
3,072.55 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,557.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Spain flag
Spain
1,089.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,085.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Thailand flag
Thailand
924.587 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
577.747 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
532.289 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
527.704 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
299.221 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
85.905 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
71.305 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
24.919 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
663.663 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
South Korea flag
South Korea
190.094 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
129.646 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
23.037 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
2.764 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.605 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  5. #5Angola flagAngola
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Austria flagAustria
  8. #8Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  9. #9Algeria flagAlgeria
  10. #10Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tunisia flagTunisia
  9. #156Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  10. #155Sudan flagSudan

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1977, dam capacity per capita emerged as a significant metric for evaluating the water resource management efficiency of countries worldwide. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, offers crucial insights into a nation's ability to store and manage water, impacting everything from agricultural productivity to industrial operations and community well-being. With varying capacities across different regions, understanding these disparities is vital for addressing water security challenges and fostering sustainable development.

The dam capacity per capita in 1977 reveals striking contrasts between nations, highlighting vast differences in water management strategies and resource availability. With a total of 123 countries reporting data, the range of dam capacity per person extended from an impressive 51,939 cubic meters in Suriname to virtually no capacity in countries like Cambodia and Bhutan. On average, the global dam capacity stood at 2,084.37 cubic meters per inhabitant, yet the median value was significantly lower at 242.89 cubic meters. This discrepancy underscores the concentration of water resources in a few high-capacity countries, emphasizing the need for equitable water distribution and infrastructural investments in less endowed regions.

Regional Disparities in Water Resource Management

Geographic analysis of the 1977 data unveils a stark contrast between water-rich and water-scarce regions. Countries like Suriname and Canada led the world with vast water storage capacities of 51,939 and 28,704.6 cubic meters per capita, respectively. This abundance is attributed to their extensive river systems and proactive dam construction policies. In contrast, several countries, including Cambodia and Bhutan, reported zero capacity, indicating either a lack of infrastructure or reliance on alternative water sources. Such disparities point to the influence of geographic and climatic factors on water resource management, as well as the varying levels of economic development and policy priorities across different regions.

Economic Impact on Agriculture and Industry

The implications of dam capacity on economic activities in 1977 were profound. Nations with higher per capita water storage, such as Zambia and Zimbabwe, boasted capacities of 18,144 and 15,269.8 cubic meters, respectively. These figures supported extensive agricultural operations reliant on consistent water supply for irrigation. Conversely, countries with minimal storage capacity faced challenges in maintaining agricultural productivity and industrial growth. The year-over-year changes also highlighted significant shifts, with Canada experiencing an increase of 2,314.50 cubic meters per capita, driven by investments in water infrastructure. Such dynamics illustrate the pivotal role of water resources in shaping economic landscapes and fostering development.

A historical perspective on 1977's dam capacity per capita reveals trends in global development and infrastructure expansion. The incremental changes, with an average rise of 20.83 cubic meters per capita, reflect ongoing efforts to improve water storage capabilities through dam construction and modernization. While countries like Argentina saw a dramatic 76.8% increase, other nations faced declines, as evidenced by Zambia's 3.0% reduction. These variations indicate evolving national priorities and the impact of economic constraints or political shifts on water management strategies. The data underscores the importance of sustained investment in water infrastructure to accommodate growing populations and address future water security challenges.

Sustainability and Climate Resilience

In the context of 1977, the sustainability of water resources emerged as a critical consideration, with dam capacity per capita serving as a proxy for a country's resilience to climate variability. Nations like Iceland, with a capacity of 6,198.33 cubic meters, demonstrated a proactive stance towards mitigating the impacts of climate change through robust water management systems. However, the absence of storage capacity in several countries highlighted vulnerabilities to environmental changes and extreme weather events. As global awareness of climate issues grew, the need for integrated water management strategies became increasingly apparent, underscoring the role of dams in enhancing climate resilience and ensuring long-term sustainability.

Overall, the dam capacity per capita in 1977 offers a valuable lens through which to examine the interplay of geography, economics, and policy in shaping water resource management. By understanding these dynamics, policymakers and stakeholders can better address the challenges and opportunities inherent in global water security, fostering a more equitable and sustainable future.

Insights by country

1

Turkmenistan

In 1977, Turkmenistan ranked a low 161 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant deficiency in water storage infrastructure relative to the population at that time.

The lack of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic characteristics, limited investment in water management infrastructure, and historical reliance on natural water sources. Turkmenistan's arid climate and reliance on irrigation for agriculture exacerbate the challenges of water availability and management.

Interestingly, Turkmenistan's water resource management has evolved over the years, with subsequent investments aimed at improving water storage and distribution systems. However, the statistics from 1977 highlight a period when the country faced considerable challenges in meeting the water needs of its population.

2

Sweden

In 1977, Sweden ranked 15th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 4284.45 cubic meters per inhabitant. This significant capacity reflects Sweden's extensive investment in hydropower infrastructure, aligning with its commitment to renewable energy sources.

The high dam capacity can be attributed to Sweden's geographical features, which include numerous rivers and lakes suitable for hydropower generation. Additionally, government policies during the mid-20th century emphasized the development of renewable energy, leading to the construction of large-scale dams.

As a further context, Sweden has historically been a leader in sustainable energy practices, with hydropower contributing to approximately 45% of its total electricity generation by the late 20th century. This focus on renewable energy not only supports the country's energy needs but also positions Sweden as a model for environmental sustainability worldwide.

3

Sao Tome and Principe

In 1977, Sao Tome and Principe ranked 151 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant lack of infrastructure for water management and storage, which is critical for both domestic and agricultural needs in the island nation.

The absence of dam capacity suggests limited investment in hydraulic infrastructure, which might stem from the country's historical context, including its colonial past and subsequent economic challenges. Additionally, the geographical nature of the islands, with their small size and volcanic landscape, may have contributed to difficulties in constructing large-scale water retention systems.

Interestingly, the lower dam capacity per capita can also impact agricultural productivity and food security, as reliable water supply is essential for farming practices in tropical climates. Furthermore, this statistic highlights the broader challenges faced by small island developing states in managing natural resources effectively.

4

Cameroon

In 1977, Cameroon achieved a significant ranking of 44th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country's dam capacity was measured at 575.973 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its ability to harness and manage water resources effectively for various needs, including agriculture, energy production, and domestic use.

This notable figure can be attributed to Cameroon’s extensive river systems, particularly the Sanaga River, which is the longest river in the country and plays a crucial role in hydroelectric power generation. The investment in dam infrastructure during this period aimed to support the growing population and enhance economic development through improved access to water and electricity.

Additionally, the high dam capacity per capita illustrates the government's commitment to water resource management, which has been vital for irrigation and supporting the agricultural sector, a key component of Cameroon's economy. This statistic also places Cameroon in a favorable position relative to many other countries, indicating a relatively advanced state of water management for that time.

5

United States

In 1977, the United States ranked 23rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 3072.55 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the extensive network of dams across the country, which are primarily used for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and hydroelectric power generation.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the vast geography of the United States, which includes numerous rivers and lakes suitable for dam construction. Additionally, the economic resources available during this period facilitated significant investment in infrastructure projects aimed at harnessing water resources for agricultural, industrial, and residential use.

Interestingly, this capacity has implications for environmental management and water resource planning, as regions with high dam capacities must balance water supply needs with ecological considerations. The historical context of dam construction in the U.S. also ties into broader themes of industrial growth and environmental policy, demonstrating the duality of development and conservation.

6

Mauritius

In 1977, Mauritius ranked 85th out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 69.0349 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage water resources effectively in the face of its limited natural freshwater supply.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the island's unique geographical and climatic conditions, which necessitate the construction of reservoirs to support agricultural activities and domestic water needs. Furthermore, the Mauritian government has historically prioritized infrastructure development to enhance water security and manage seasonal rainfall variations.

Interestingly, Mauritius has made significant strides in water resource management since the late 20th century, which has contributed to its reputation as one of the more developed nations in Africa. The emphasis on sustainable practices and the strategic utilization of dam capacities have played a crucial role in the country’s overall socioeconomic development.

7

Bhutan

In 1977, Bhutan ranked 122 out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the nation's limited infrastructure for hydropower and water management at that time, stemming from the country's geographical challenges and economic constraints.

The lack of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Bhutan's mountainous terrain, which complicates the development of large-scale dam projects. Furthermore, during this period, Bhutan was in the early stages of exploring its hydropower potential, which would later become a significant driver of its economy. The country has since made significant advancements in hydropower development, leveraging its rich water resources to generate renewable energy.

As of recent years, Bhutan has emerged as a leader in clean energy production, with hydropower contributing to over 80% of its total electricity generation, showcasing a dramatic shift from its earlier status in the 1970s.

8

Grenada

In 1977, Grenada ranked 115th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 0.113382 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited water storage capabilities relative to its population, which can impact water availability and management.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Grenada may be attributed to several factors, including the country's small geographic size and limited infrastructure investment in water resources at that time. Additionally, Grenada's topography, characterized by hills and a tropical climate, poses challenges for large-scale dam construction.

As a Caribbean nation, Grenada is also subject to seasonal rainfall patterns, which can influence water availability. This statistic highlights the importance of effective water management strategies in small island nations, where freshwater resources are often scarce and vulnerable to climate variability.

9

Antigua and Barbuda

In 1977, Antigua and Barbuda ranked 81st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant value of 78.6227 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's focus on water resource management, particularly given its geographical characteristics as a small island nation susceptible to climate variability.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the island's need to ensure a reliable water supply for its residents and agriculture, especially in the face of seasonal droughts and limited freshwater sources. The development of infrastructure to support water storage and management has been essential for sustaining the population and supporting economic activities such as tourism and agriculture.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that Antigua and Barbuda's ranking indicates a proactive approach in comparison to many other nations, as the capacity for water storage is crucial for disaster preparedness and resilience against climate change impacts, which are increasingly relevant for Caribbean nations.

10

Iceland

In 1977, Iceland ranked 10th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive capacity of 6198.33 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high ranking reflects Iceland's significant investment in hydroelectric power, which has historically been a critical component of the nation's energy strategy.

The extensive dam capacity is largely due to Iceland's unique geographical features, including its numerous rivers and waterfalls, as well as its volcanic activity, which provides a sustainable source of energy. The country has harnessed its natural resources effectively to meet its energy needs, with hydropower accounting for a substantial portion of its total electricity generation.

Additionally, the emphasis on renewable energy aligns with Iceland's commitment to sustainability and environmental conservation, making it a leader in the global transition toward cleaner energy sources. This focus not only supports domestic energy requirements but also positions Iceland favorably in international discussions regarding climate change and energy policy.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts