Dam capacity per capita 1977
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Australia | 4,269.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3,933.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 3,511.38 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Bulgaria | 609.335 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Angola | 590.564 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 342.866 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Austria | 242.886 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Afghanistan | 150.591 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Algeria | 107.943 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Antigua and Barbuda | 78.623 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Bangladesh | 79.116 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Canada | 28,704.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Brazil | 4,062.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Chile | 878.194 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Cameroon | 575.973 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Botswana | 381.203 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Cuba | 364.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | China | 277.981 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Brunei Darussalam | 265.913 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Colombia | 224.447 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Burkina Faso | 133.492 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Dominican Republic | 67.998 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Cyprus | 64.767 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Bolivia | 53.861 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Costa Rica | 16.735 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 6.46 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Congo | 5.271 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.182 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Benin | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Egypt | 4,127.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | El Salvador | 813.483 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Eswatini | 134.904 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Ecuador | 27.329 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Ghana | 13,578.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Iraq | 10,307.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Iceland | 6,198.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Finland | 3,925.86 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Laos | 2,253.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Kenya | 1,398.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Greece | 1,037.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Lesotho | 671.409 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Iran | 444.46 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Ireland | 265.12 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Guyana | 263.823 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | India | 234.541 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | France | 169.379 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Italy | 142.473 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Liberia | 135.106 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Japan | 107.121 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lebanon | 79.648 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Haiti | 56.043 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Indonesia | 55.286 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Guinea | 49.363 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Germany | 37.733 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Honduras | 7.412 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Denmark | 3.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Jordan | 3.269 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Jamaica | 2.632 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Hungary | 2.617 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Guatemala | 0.128 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Fiji | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Gabon | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Grenada | 0.113 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 71.642 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 10,683.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Mozambique | 7,088.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Norway | 5,292.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | New Zealand | 5,061.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Panama | 4,685.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Paraguay | 3,016.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Mexico | 1,386.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | North Korea | 1,019.41 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Namibia | 641.636 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Portugal | 617.853 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Malaysia | 608.238 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Nigeria | 495.515 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Netherlands | 465.368 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Morocco | 365.045 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Pakistan | 356.621 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Romania | 272.205 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Peru | 247.426 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Mongolia | 158.605 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Luxembourg | 149.722 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Myanmar | 76.896 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Mauritius | 69.035 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Madagascar | 60.015 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Mali | 24.679 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Malawi | 7.436 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Philippines | 88.262 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Poland | 56.783 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Niger | 3.981 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Nepal | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Saint Lucia | 22.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 54.456 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 51,939 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 18,144 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 15,269.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uganda | 6,472.67 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Tanzania | 5,820.16 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Sweden | 4,284.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Uruguay | 3,903.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 3,072.55 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,557.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Spain | 1,089.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Turkey | 1,085.02 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Thailand | 924.587 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Venezuela | 577.747 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Switzerland | 532.289 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Vietnam | 527.704 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Sri Lanka | 299.221 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 85.905 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 71.305 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 24.919 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 663.663 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | South Korea | 190.094 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tunisia | 129.646 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 23.037 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 2.764 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.605 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Australia
- #2
Côte d'Ivoire
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Bulgaria
- #5
Angola
- #6
Albania
- #7
Austria
- #8
Afghanistan
- #9
Algeria
- #10
Antigua and Barbuda
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tunisia
- #156
Tajikistan
- #155
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1977, dam capacity per capita emerged as a significant metric for evaluating the water resource management efficiency of countries worldwide. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, offers crucial insights into a nation's ability to store and manage water, impacting everything from agricultural productivity to industrial operations and community well-being. With varying capacities across different regions, understanding these disparities is vital for addressing water security challenges and fostering sustainable development.
Global Water Storage Trends in 1977
The dam capacity per capita in 1977 reveals striking contrasts between nations, highlighting vast differences in water management strategies and resource availability. With a total of 123 countries reporting data, the range of dam capacity per person extended from an impressive 51,939 cubic meters in Suriname to virtually no capacity in countries like Cambodia and Bhutan. On average, the global dam capacity stood at 2,084.37 cubic meters per inhabitant, yet the median value was significantly lower at 242.89 cubic meters. This discrepancy underscores the concentration of water resources in a few high-capacity countries, emphasizing the need for equitable water distribution and infrastructural investments in less endowed regions.
Regional Disparities in Water Resource Management
Geographic analysis of the 1977 data unveils a stark contrast between water-rich and water-scarce regions. Countries like Suriname and Canada led the world with vast water storage capacities of 51,939 and 28,704.6 cubic meters per capita, respectively. This abundance is attributed to their extensive river systems and proactive dam construction policies. In contrast, several countries, including Cambodia and Bhutan, reported zero capacity, indicating either a lack of infrastructure or reliance on alternative water sources. Such disparities point to the influence of geographic and climatic factors on water resource management, as well as the varying levels of economic development and policy priorities across different regions.
Economic Impact on Agriculture and Industry
The implications of dam capacity on economic activities in 1977 were profound. Nations with higher per capita water storage, such as Zambia and Zimbabwe, boasted capacities of 18,144 and 15,269.8 cubic meters, respectively. These figures supported extensive agricultural operations reliant on consistent water supply for irrigation. Conversely, countries with minimal storage capacity faced challenges in maintaining agricultural productivity and industrial growth. The year-over-year changes also highlighted significant shifts, with Canada experiencing an increase of 2,314.50 cubic meters per capita, driven by investments in water infrastructure. Such dynamics illustrate the pivotal role of water resources in shaping economic landscapes and fostering development.
Historical Context and Development Trends
A historical perspective on 1977's dam capacity per capita reveals trends in global development and infrastructure expansion. The incremental changes, with an average rise of 20.83 cubic meters per capita, reflect ongoing efforts to improve water storage capabilities through dam construction and modernization. While countries like Argentina saw a dramatic 76.8% increase, other nations faced declines, as evidenced by Zambia's 3.0% reduction. These variations indicate evolving national priorities and the impact of economic constraints or political shifts on water management strategies. The data underscores the importance of sustained investment in water infrastructure to accommodate growing populations and address future water security challenges.
Sustainability and Climate Resilience
In the context of 1977, the sustainability of water resources emerged as a critical consideration, with dam capacity per capita serving as a proxy for a country's resilience to climate variability. Nations like Iceland, with a capacity of 6,198.33 cubic meters, demonstrated a proactive stance towards mitigating the impacts of climate change through robust water management systems. However, the absence of storage capacity in several countries highlighted vulnerabilities to environmental changes and extreme weather events. As global awareness of climate issues grew, the need for integrated water management strategies became increasingly apparent, underscoring the role of dams in enhancing climate resilience and ensuring long-term sustainability.
Overall, the dam capacity per capita in 1977 offers a valuable lens through which to examine the interplay of geography, economics, and policy in shaping water resource management. By understanding these dynamics, policymakers and stakeholders can better address the challenges and opportunities inherent in global water security, fostering a more equitable and sustainable future.
Insights by country
Turkmenistan
In 1977, Turkmenistan ranked a low 161 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant deficiency in water storage infrastructure relative to the population at that time.
The lack of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic characteristics, limited investment in water management infrastructure, and historical reliance on natural water sources. Turkmenistan's arid climate and reliance on irrigation for agriculture exacerbate the challenges of water availability and management.
Interestingly, Turkmenistan's water resource management has evolved over the years, with subsequent investments aimed at improving water storage and distribution systems. However, the statistics from 1977 highlight a period when the country faced considerable challenges in meeting the water needs of its population.
Sweden
In 1977, Sweden ranked 15th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 4284.45 cubic meters per inhabitant. This significant capacity reflects Sweden's extensive investment in hydropower infrastructure, aligning with its commitment to renewable energy sources.
The high dam capacity can be attributed to Sweden's geographical features, which include numerous rivers and lakes suitable for hydropower generation. Additionally, government policies during the mid-20th century emphasized the development of renewable energy, leading to the construction of large-scale dams.
As a further context, Sweden has historically been a leader in sustainable energy practices, with hydropower contributing to approximately 45% of its total electricity generation by the late 20th century. This focus on renewable energy not only supports the country's energy needs but also positions Sweden as a model for environmental sustainability worldwide.
Sao Tome and Principe
In 1977, Sao Tome and Principe ranked 151 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant lack of infrastructure for water management and storage, which is critical for both domestic and agricultural needs in the island nation.
The absence of dam capacity suggests limited investment in hydraulic infrastructure, which might stem from the country's historical context, including its colonial past and subsequent economic challenges. Additionally, the geographical nature of the islands, with their small size and volcanic landscape, may have contributed to difficulties in constructing large-scale water retention systems.
Interestingly, the lower dam capacity per capita can also impact agricultural productivity and food security, as reliable water supply is essential for farming practices in tropical climates. Furthermore, this statistic highlights the broader challenges faced by small island developing states in managing natural resources effectively.
Cameroon
In 1977, Cameroon achieved a significant ranking of 44th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country's dam capacity was measured at 575.973 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its ability to harness and manage water resources effectively for various needs, including agriculture, energy production, and domestic use.
This notable figure can be attributed to Cameroon’s extensive river systems, particularly the Sanaga River, which is the longest river in the country and plays a crucial role in hydroelectric power generation. The investment in dam infrastructure during this period aimed to support the growing population and enhance economic development through improved access to water and electricity.
Additionally, the high dam capacity per capita illustrates the government's commitment to water resource management, which has been vital for irrigation and supporting the agricultural sector, a key component of Cameroon's economy. This statistic also places Cameroon in a favorable position relative to many other countries, indicating a relatively advanced state of water management for that time.
United States
In 1977, the United States ranked 23rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 3072.55 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the extensive network of dams across the country, which are primarily used for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and hydroelectric power generation.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the vast geography of the United States, which includes numerous rivers and lakes suitable for dam construction. Additionally, the economic resources available during this period facilitated significant investment in infrastructure projects aimed at harnessing water resources for agricultural, industrial, and residential use.
Interestingly, this capacity has implications for environmental management and water resource planning, as regions with high dam capacities must balance water supply needs with ecological considerations. The historical context of dam construction in the U.S. also ties into broader themes of industrial growth and environmental policy, demonstrating the duality of development and conservation.
Mauritius
In 1977, Mauritius ranked 85th out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 69.0349 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage water resources effectively in the face of its limited natural freshwater supply.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the island's unique geographical and climatic conditions, which necessitate the construction of reservoirs to support agricultural activities and domestic water needs. Furthermore, the Mauritian government has historically prioritized infrastructure development to enhance water security and manage seasonal rainfall variations.
Interestingly, Mauritius has made significant strides in water resource management since the late 20th century, which has contributed to its reputation as one of the more developed nations in Africa. The emphasis on sustainable practices and the strategic utilization of dam capacities have played a crucial role in the country’s overall socioeconomic development.
Bhutan
In 1977, Bhutan ranked 122 out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the nation's limited infrastructure for hydropower and water management at that time, stemming from the country's geographical challenges and economic constraints.
The lack of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Bhutan's mountainous terrain, which complicates the development of large-scale dam projects. Furthermore, during this period, Bhutan was in the early stages of exploring its hydropower potential, which would later become a significant driver of its economy. The country has since made significant advancements in hydropower development, leveraging its rich water resources to generate renewable energy.
As of recent years, Bhutan has emerged as a leader in clean energy production, with hydropower contributing to over 80% of its total electricity generation, showcasing a dramatic shift from its earlier status in the 1970s.
Grenada
In 1977, Grenada ranked 115th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 0.113382 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited water storage capabilities relative to its population, which can impact water availability and management.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Grenada may be attributed to several factors, including the country's small geographic size and limited infrastructure investment in water resources at that time. Additionally, Grenada's topography, characterized by hills and a tropical climate, poses challenges for large-scale dam construction.
As a Caribbean nation, Grenada is also subject to seasonal rainfall patterns, which can influence water availability. This statistic highlights the importance of effective water management strategies in small island nations, where freshwater resources are often scarce and vulnerable to climate variability.
Antigua and Barbuda
In 1977, Antigua and Barbuda ranked 81st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant value of 78.6227 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's focus on water resource management, particularly given its geographical characteristics as a small island nation susceptible to climate variability.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the island's need to ensure a reliable water supply for its residents and agriculture, especially in the face of seasonal droughts and limited freshwater sources. The development of infrastructure to support water storage and management has been essential for sustaining the population and supporting economic activities such as tourism and agriculture.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that Antigua and Barbuda's ranking indicates a proactive approach in comparison to many other nations, as the capacity for water storage is crucial for disaster preparedness and resilience against climate change impacts, which are increasingly relevant for Caribbean nations.
Iceland
In 1977, Iceland ranked 10th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive capacity of 6198.33 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high ranking reflects Iceland's significant investment in hydroelectric power, which has historically been a critical component of the nation's energy strategy.
The extensive dam capacity is largely due to Iceland's unique geographical features, including its numerous rivers and waterfalls, as well as its volcanic activity, which provides a sustainable source of energy. The country has harnessed its natural resources effectively to meet its energy needs, with hydropower accounting for a substantial portion of its total electricity generation.
Additionally, the emphasis on renewable energy aligns with Iceland's commitment to sustainability and environmental conservation, making it a leader in the global transition toward cleaner energy sources. This focus not only supports domestic energy requirements but also positions Iceland favorably in international discussions regarding climate change and energy policy.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data