Dam capacity per capita 1991

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
29,695 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Australia flag
Australia
4,482.54 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,243.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
2,936.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,337.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
1,227.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Chile flag
Chile
827.48 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
608.536 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Cuba flag
Cuba
456.846 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Angola flag
Angola
371.789 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Austria flag
Austria
274.289 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Algeria flag
Algeria
168.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
164.149 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
79.212 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,965.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
745.464 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
342.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Botswana flag
Botswana
337.397 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
China flag
China
275.094 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Colombia flag
Colombia
241.732 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
235.869 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
171.415 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
72.752 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
56.922 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
334.231 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.468 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Benin flag
Benin
4.314 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo flag
Congo
3.675 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.394 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Ghana flag
Ghana
9,406.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Iceland flag
Iceland
8,944.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Iraq flag
Iraq
8,543.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Finland flag
Finland
3,710.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,801.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Honduras flag
Honduras
1,117.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,081.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Greece flag
Greece
1,054.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
705.905 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iran flag
Iran
295.765 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
278.185 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Ireland flag
Ireland
245.879 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
India flag
India
231.658 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Gabon flag
Gabon
217.646 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
France flag
France
173.316 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Fiji flag
Fiji
170.588 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
76.553 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Laos flag
Laos
1,587.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,044.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
472.43 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Italy flag
Italy
155.473 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Japan flag
Japan
140.125 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Liberia flag
Liberia
121.951 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
94.733 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
59.963 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
49.729 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Haiti flag
Haiti
42.456 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Germany flag
Germany
40.272 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Guinea flag
Guinea
35.388 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Jordan flag
Jordan
25.951 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.706 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.179 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
85.796 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
7,513.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Norway flag
Norway
6,845.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
5,556.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
5,552.43 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
4,851.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Panama flag
Panama
3,471.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mali flag
Mali
1,454.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
1,215.09 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,195.06 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
North Korea flag
North Korea
832.828 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Portugal flag
Portugal
698.443 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
609.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Namibia flag
Namibia
500.488 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Romania flag
Romania
459.982 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Morocco flag
Morocco
443.933 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
436.332 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
248.789 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
230.817 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Peru flag
Peru
216.48 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
146.399 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
113.494 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
88.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Philippines flag
Philippines
84.697 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Poland flag
Poland
64.304 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
61.077 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
39.727 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Oman flag
Oman
26.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
18.635 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Niger flag
Niger
9.754 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Nepal flag
Nepal
4.257 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Malawi flag
Malawi
4.242 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Maldives flag
Maldives
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Suriname flag
Suriname
48,191.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Zambia flag
Zambia
12,670.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
9,561.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
7,543 cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,493.83 cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Uganda flag
Uganda
4,406.28 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,173.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
3,890.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
United States flag
United States
2,851.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,042.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Togo flag
Togo
417.311 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
310.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
South Korea flag
South Korea
276.421 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
255.161 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
243.378 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
90.982 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
55.405 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
51.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Senegal flag
Senegal
31.474 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Yemen flag
Yemen
28.159 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Singapore flag
Singapore
23.882 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
13.366 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,484.65 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,390.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Spain flag
Spain
1,231.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
South Africa flag
South Africa
709.162 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
491.912 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
56.625 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
470.648 cubic meters per inhabitant
163
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
11.194 cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Australia flagAustralia
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  5. #5Cameroon flagCameroon
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Chile flagChile
  8. #8Costa Rica flagCosta Rica
  9. #9Cuba flagCuba
  10. #10Angola flagAngola

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  2. #163United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  3. #162Vietnam flagVietnam
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  7. #158Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  8. #157Switzerland flagSwitzerland
  9. #156Sudan flagSudan
  10. #155State of Palestine flagState of Palestine

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1991, the concept of dam capacity per capita emerged as a critical measure of water resource availability, showcasing the importance of sustainable water management strategies. Expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, this statistic reveals the potential water storage available to each individual within a country, highlighting the disparities in water accessibility and the implications for agricultural, industrial, and community development. In a rapidly evolving global landscape, understanding these metrics is vital for addressing water security challenges and supporting sustainable growth.

Global Disparities in Dam Capacity

In 1991, the dam capacity per capita varied significantly across the globe, with stark differences in water storage facilities among countries. Suriname led the world with a remarkable 48,191.3 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a vast capacity to support its population's water needs. Meanwhile, Canada, with its extensive freshwater resources, followed with 29,695 cubic meters per inhabitant. These figures contrast sharply with countries like Papua New Guinea, Bhutan, and Belize, where the dam capacity per capita was effectively zero, reflecting either a lack of infrastructure or differing priorities in water management.

Regional Dynamics and Water Resource Management

Regionally, the data reveals interesting patterns. In Africa, countries such as Zambia (12,670.7) and Zimbabwe (9,561.91) showcased considerable dam capacities, yet these figures mask underlying regional challenges, including uneven distribution and accessibility. In contrast, European nations like Iceland (8,944.89) and Norway (6,845.49) demonstrated advanced water management capabilities, supported by their geographical advantages and robust infrastructure. These disparities underscore the need for tailored water management strategies that account for regional conditions and resources.

Sustainability and Development Implications

The variance in dam capacity per capita has profound implications for sustainability and development. High capacity in countries like Suriname and Canada highlights the potential for agricultural expansion, industrial development, and enhanced community water security. Conversely, countries with minimal capacity are more vulnerable to water scarcity, impacting food security, economic stability, and public health. Addressing these challenges requires integrated approaches that prioritize sustainable water resource management, investment in infrastructure, and cross-border cooperation to manage shared water bodies effectively.

Year-over-Year Changes and Trends

The year 1991 saw notable shifts in dam capacity per capita across the world. Iceland experienced a significant increase of 1,465.09 cubic meters per inhabitant, a 19.6% rise, reflecting improvements in infrastructure and resource management. Vietnam also saw a notable 7.4% increase, indicating proactive measures to enhance its water storage capacity. On the other hand, countries like Canada (-352.50) and Zambia (-318.20) experienced declines, suggesting potential challenges in maintaining or expanding existing infrastructure. These dynamics highlight the importance of continuous investment in water management strategies to adapt to changing environmental and demographic conditions.

Policy and Governance Influences

The disparities in dam capacity per capita can also be attributed to differences in policy and governance frameworks. Countries that have emphasized water security through comprehensive policies and investment tend to have higher capacity figures. For instance, countries with robust governance structures, like Norway, often lead in sustainable water management. Conversely, nations facing political instability or resource allocation challenges may lag, as seen in several countries with minimal or zero dam capacity per capita. Effective governance is crucial in ensuring the equitable distribution of water resources and mitigating the impacts of climate change on water availability.

In summary, the dam capacity per capita metric in 1991 provided valuable insights into global water resource management. By highlighting disparities, revealing regional dynamics, and reflecting policy influences, it underscored the need for targeted strategies to ensure equitable access to water resources and support sustainable development across diverse geographic landscapes. As the world continues to grapple with water security challenges, these insights remain relevant for shaping future policy and infrastructure investments.

Insights by country

1

Ecuador

Ecuador ranked 93rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1991. The country had a dam capacity of 76.5531 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a moderate level of water resource management compared to global standards.

This capacity reflects Ecuador's investment in hydropower, which is a significant source of energy for the nation, as it possesses substantial water resources due to its diverse topography and climate. The reliance on hydroelectric power plants has led to an extensive network of dams, which contribute to both energy production and water storage.

Factors contributing to this statistic include Ecuador's geographical features, including the Andes mountains and ample rainfall in certain regions, which make it conducive for developing hydropower infrastructure. Additionally, the country's commitment to renewable energy has historically prioritized hydropower projects, enhancing its dam capacity over time.

2

Botswana

Botswana ranked 59th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1991. The country had a dam capacity of 337.397 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its significant investment in water infrastructure to support both its population and agricultural needs.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Botswana's semi-arid climate, which necessitates the management of water resources to ensure sustainability. The government has prioritized the development of dams to mitigate water scarcity and support economic activities, particularly in the agricultural sector, where irrigation is essential for crop production.

In addition, Botswana's commitment to water resource management has been influenced by its historical challenges with droughts and water shortages, pushing the country to enhance its capacity for water storage and distribution. This focus on infrastructural development has also led to improvements in public health and sanitation, contributing to overall quality of life.

3

Costa Rica

Costa Rica ranked 47th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1991. The country recorded a dam capacity of 608.536 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its significant investment in water infrastructure to support both agricultural and urban needs.

This high capacity is indicative of Costa Rica's focus on sustainable resource management and its commitment to renewable energy, particularly hydroelectric power, which has historically contributed to the nation's energy supply. The presence of numerous rivers and favorable topography further enhances its capability to develop large dam projects.

Additionally, Costa Rica's emphasis on environmental conservation and sustainable practices has driven investments in water management systems, allowing for efficient distribution and utilization of water resources. As a result, the country has been able to maintain a balance between development and ecological preservation.

4

Slovakia

In 1991, Slovakia ranked 156th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, indicating a significant lack of water storage infrastructure with a reported value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking reflects the country's limited capacity to harness water resources effectively during a period of political and economic transition following the dissolution of Czechoslovakia.

The absence of dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including the relatively low investment in infrastructure development during the communist era, which prioritized industrial and urban growth over water management systems. Additionally, the focus on immediate economic recovery in the early 1990s may have diverted attention from long-term environmental and resource management strategies.

Moreover, Slovakia's geographical landscape, characterized by mountainous regions and rivers, poses both opportunities and challenges for water management. While the country possesses numerous rivers, the development of dams and reservoirs requires substantial investment and planning to balance ecological considerations with human needs.

5

Cuba

Cuba ranked 53rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1991, with a notable capacity of 456.846 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water management and infrastructure, which is essential for supporting agriculture, industry, and domestic water supply.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Cuba's geographical characteristics, including numerous rivers and a tropical climate that necessitates effective water control systems. Additionally, the government has historically prioritized the development of hydraulic infrastructure to mitigate the impacts of droughts and ensure water availability for its population.

In comparison to other countries, Cuba's dam capacity per capita is indicative of its proactive approach to water resource management, which is crucial for an island nation with limited freshwater resources. This focus on infrastructure aligns with broader efforts to enhance sustainability and resilience against climate-related challenges.

6

Congo

In 1991, Congo ranked 122nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 3.67463 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low per capita dam capacity reflects the country's limited infrastructure development and reliance on natural water resources for its energy and irrigation needs.

The modest dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including political instability, economic challenges, and insufficient investment in energy infrastructure during this period. The country has faced numerous conflicts that have hindered the development of essential utilities, including hydroelectric projects.

Moreover, while Congo possesses significant hydroelectric potential due to its abundant river systems, the realization of this potential has been hampered by both financial constraints and governance issues. As a result, the capacity for energy generation has been underutilized, impacting overall economic growth and access to electricity for the population.

7

Denmark

In 1991, Denmark ranked 121st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 3.88022 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water management practices and infrastructure related to reservoirs and dams.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Denmark's geographical characteristics, as the country has a flat landscape with limited large river systems compared to other nations. Additionally, Denmark has historically focused on sustainable water management and conservation, which impacts the overall capacity of water storage systems.

Interestingly, Denmark has made significant investments in renewable energy, particularly wind energy, which has helped to reduce reliance on water reservoirs for energy generation. This shift in focus highlights the country's commitment to environmental sustainability and efficient resource management.

8

Czech Republic

In 1991, the Czech Republic ranked 136th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates that, during that period, there was either inadequate data or a lack of significant dam infrastructure relative to the population size.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including the historical context of the region following the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in 1993 and the economic transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented system. Infrastructure investments were likely focused on other pressing needs, such as industrial development and urbanization, rather than on dam construction or significant water management projects.

As a point of interest, the Czech Republic has since improved its water management systems, reflecting a growing awareness of environmental sustainability and resource management. In subsequent years, the country has invested in infrastructure that supports water conservation and flood control, which underscores the evolving priorities in environmental policy.

9

Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan ranked 127 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1991. The dam capacity per capita for Azerbaijan was recorded as null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a lack of measurable dam capacity relative to its population at that time.

This statistic can be attributed to several factors, including the country's economic conditions following its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, which resulted in limited investment in infrastructure development. Additionally, the region faced challenges related to political instability and conflict, notably the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which diverted attention and resources away from essential infrastructure projects.

Despite the low dam capacity per capita, Azerbaijan is home to numerous rivers and water bodies, which have historically been pivotal for agriculture and irrigation. The country has since recognized the importance of improving its water management systems to support its growing population and economy.

10

Brazil

In 1991, Brazil ranked 18th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 3965.01 cubic meters per inhabitant. This substantial figure underscores Brazil's extensive investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which plays a critical role in the nation's energy sector.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Brazil's vast river systems, including the Amazon River and its numerous tributaries, which provide ample opportunities for hydroelectric power generation. Additionally, Brazil's reliance on renewable energy sources has led to the construction of many large dams to support its energy needs, making it one of the world's leaders in renewable energy generation.

Interestingly, Brazil's commitment to hydroelectric power has allowed it to achieve one of the highest percentages of electricity generated from renewable sources globally, often exceeding 80%. This focus on renewable energy has implications for both environmental sustainability and energy security in the region.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts