Dam capacity per capita 1991
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 29,695 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Australia | 4,482.54 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 3,243.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2,936.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Cameroon | 1,337.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 1,227.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Chile | 827.48 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Costa Rica | 608.536 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Cuba | 456.846 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Angola | 371.789 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Austria | 274.289 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Algeria | 168.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Afghanistan | 164.149 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Antigua and Barbuda | 79.212 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Brazil | 3,965.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Bulgaria | 745.464 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Cyprus | 342.46 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Botswana | 337.397 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | China | 275.094 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Colombia | 241.732 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Dominican Republic | 235.869 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Brunei Darussalam | 171.415 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Bolivia | 72.752 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Bangladesh | 56.922 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Burkina Faso | 334.231 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 14.468 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Benin | 4.314 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo | 3.675 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.394 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Ghana | 9,406.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Iceland | 8,944.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Iraq | 8,543.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Finland | 3,710.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Egypt | 2,801.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Honduras | 1,117.46 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Guyana | 1,081.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Greece | 1,054.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | El Salvador | 705.905 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Iran | 295.765 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Eswatini | 278.185 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Ireland | 245.879 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | India | 231.658 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Gabon | 217.646 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | France | 173.316 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Fiji | 170.588 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Ecuador | 76.553 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Laos | 1,587.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Kenya | 1,044.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lesotho | 472.43 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Italy | 155.473 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Japan | 140.125 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Liberia | 121.951 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Indonesia | 94.733 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Lebanon | 59.963 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Guatemala | 49.729 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Haiti | 42.456 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Germany | 40.272 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Guinea | 35.388 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Jordan | 25.951 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Hungary | 24.706 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Denmark | 3.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Jamaica | 2.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Grenada | 0.179 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 85.796 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 7,513.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Norway | 6,845.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Paraguay | 5,556.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Mozambique | 5,552.43 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | New Zealand | 4,851.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Panama | 3,471.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Mali | 1,454.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Malaysia | 1,215.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Mexico | 1,195.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | North Korea | 832.828 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Portugal | 698.443 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Netherlands | 609.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Namibia | 500.488 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Romania | 459.982 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Morocco | 443.933 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Nigeria | 436.332 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Mauritania | 248.789 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Pakistan | 230.817 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Peru | 216.48 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Luxembourg | 146.399 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Mongolia | 113.494 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Myanmar | 88.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Philippines | 84.697 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Poland | 64.304 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Mauritius | 61.077 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Madagascar | 39.727 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Oman | 26.46 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Saint Lucia | 18.635 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Niger | 9.754 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Nepal | 4.257 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Malawi | 4.242 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Suriname | 48,191.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Zambia | 12,670.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Zimbabwe | 9,561.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Venezuela | 7,543 cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Uruguay | 5,493.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Uganda | 4,406.28 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Sweden | 4,173.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Tanzania | 3,890.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | United States | 2,851.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,042.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Togo | 417.311 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sao Tome and Principe | 310.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | South Korea | 276.421 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Sri Lanka | 255.161 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Tunisia | 243.378 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | United Kingdom | 90.982 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Saudi Arabia | 55.405 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Sierra Leone | 51.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Senegal | 31.474 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Yemen | 28.159 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Singapore | 23.882 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 13.366 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Turkey | 1,484.65 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Thailand | 1,390.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Spain | 1,231.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | South Africa | 709.162 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Switzerland | 491.912 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.625 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Vietnam | 470.648 cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | United Arab Emirates | 11.194 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Uzbekistan
- #163
United Arab Emirates
- #162
Vietnam
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Trinidad and Tobago
- #158
Tajikistan
- #157
Switzerland
- #156
Sudan
- #155
State of Palestine
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1991, the concept of dam capacity per capita emerged as a critical measure of water resource availability, showcasing the importance of sustainable water management strategies. Expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, this statistic reveals the potential water storage available to each individual within a country, highlighting the disparities in water accessibility and the implications for agricultural, industrial, and community development. In a rapidly evolving global landscape, understanding these metrics is vital for addressing water security challenges and supporting sustainable growth.
Global Disparities in Dam Capacity
In 1991, the dam capacity per capita varied significantly across the globe, with stark differences in water storage facilities among countries. Suriname led the world with a remarkable 48,191.3 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a vast capacity to support its population's water needs. Meanwhile, Canada, with its extensive freshwater resources, followed with 29,695 cubic meters per inhabitant. These figures contrast sharply with countries like Papua New Guinea, Bhutan, and Belize, where the dam capacity per capita was effectively zero, reflecting either a lack of infrastructure or differing priorities in water management.
Regional Dynamics and Water Resource Management
Regionally, the data reveals interesting patterns. In Africa, countries such as Zambia (12,670.7) and Zimbabwe (9,561.91) showcased considerable dam capacities, yet these figures mask underlying regional challenges, including uneven distribution and accessibility. In contrast, European nations like Iceland (8,944.89) and Norway (6,845.49) demonstrated advanced water management capabilities, supported by their geographical advantages and robust infrastructure. These disparities underscore the need for tailored water management strategies that account for regional conditions and resources.
Sustainability and Development Implications
The variance in dam capacity per capita has profound implications for sustainability and development. High capacity in countries like Suriname and Canada highlights the potential for agricultural expansion, industrial development, and enhanced community water security. Conversely, countries with minimal capacity are more vulnerable to water scarcity, impacting food security, economic stability, and public health. Addressing these challenges requires integrated approaches that prioritize sustainable water resource management, investment in infrastructure, and cross-border cooperation to manage shared water bodies effectively.
Year-over-Year Changes and Trends
The year 1991 saw notable shifts in dam capacity per capita across the world. Iceland experienced a significant increase of 1,465.09 cubic meters per inhabitant, a 19.6% rise, reflecting improvements in infrastructure and resource management. Vietnam also saw a notable 7.4% increase, indicating proactive measures to enhance its water storage capacity. On the other hand, countries like Canada (-352.50) and Zambia (-318.20) experienced declines, suggesting potential challenges in maintaining or expanding existing infrastructure. These dynamics highlight the importance of continuous investment in water management strategies to adapt to changing environmental and demographic conditions.
Policy and Governance Influences
The disparities in dam capacity per capita can also be attributed to differences in policy and governance frameworks. Countries that have emphasized water security through comprehensive policies and investment tend to have higher capacity figures. For instance, countries with robust governance structures, like Norway, often lead in sustainable water management. Conversely, nations facing political instability or resource allocation challenges may lag, as seen in several countries with minimal or zero dam capacity per capita. Effective governance is crucial in ensuring the equitable distribution of water resources and mitigating the impacts of climate change on water availability.
In summary, the dam capacity per capita metric in 1991 provided valuable insights into global water resource management. By highlighting disparities, revealing regional dynamics, and reflecting policy influences, it underscored the need for targeted strategies to ensure equitable access to water resources and support sustainable development across diverse geographic landscapes. As the world continues to grapple with water security challenges, these insights remain relevant for shaping future policy and infrastructure investments.
Insights by country
Ecuador
Ecuador ranked 93rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1991. The country had a dam capacity of 76.5531 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a moderate level of water resource management compared to global standards.
This capacity reflects Ecuador's investment in hydropower, which is a significant source of energy for the nation, as it possesses substantial water resources due to its diverse topography and climate. The reliance on hydroelectric power plants has led to an extensive network of dams, which contribute to both energy production and water storage.
Factors contributing to this statistic include Ecuador's geographical features, including the Andes mountains and ample rainfall in certain regions, which make it conducive for developing hydropower infrastructure. Additionally, the country's commitment to renewable energy has historically prioritized hydropower projects, enhancing its dam capacity over time.
Botswana
Botswana ranked 59th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1991. The country had a dam capacity of 337.397 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its significant investment in water infrastructure to support both its population and agricultural needs.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Botswana's semi-arid climate, which necessitates the management of water resources to ensure sustainability. The government has prioritized the development of dams to mitigate water scarcity and support economic activities, particularly in the agricultural sector, where irrigation is essential for crop production.
In addition, Botswana's commitment to water resource management has been influenced by its historical challenges with droughts and water shortages, pushing the country to enhance its capacity for water storage and distribution. This focus on infrastructural development has also led to improvements in public health and sanitation, contributing to overall quality of life.
Costa Rica
Costa Rica ranked 47th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1991. The country recorded a dam capacity of 608.536 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its significant investment in water infrastructure to support both agricultural and urban needs.
This high capacity is indicative of Costa Rica's focus on sustainable resource management and its commitment to renewable energy, particularly hydroelectric power, which has historically contributed to the nation's energy supply. The presence of numerous rivers and favorable topography further enhances its capability to develop large dam projects.
Additionally, Costa Rica's emphasis on environmental conservation and sustainable practices has driven investments in water management systems, allowing for efficient distribution and utilization of water resources. As a result, the country has been able to maintain a balance between development and ecological preservation.
Slovakia
In 1991, Slovakia ranked 156th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, indicating a significant lack of water storage infrastructure with a reported value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking reflects the country's limited capacity to harness water resources effectively during a period of political and economic transition following the dissolution of Czechoslovakia.
The absence of dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including the relatively low investment in infrastructure development during the communist era, which prioritized industrial and urban growth over water management systems. Additionally, the focus on immediate economic recovery in the early 1990s may have diverted attention from long-term environmental and resource management strategies.
Moreover, Slovakia's geographical landscape, characterized by mountainous regions and rivers, poses both opportunities and challenges for water management. While the country possesses numerous rivers, the development of dams and reservoirs requires substantial investment and planning to balance ecological considerations with human needs.
Cuba
Cuba ranked 53rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1991, with a notable capacity of 456.846 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water management and infrastructure, which is essential for supporting agriculture, industry, and domestic water supply.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Cuba's geographical characteristics, including numerous rivers and a tropical climate that necessitates effective water control systems. Additionally, the government has historically prioritized the development of hydraulic infrastructure to mitigate the impacts of droughts and ensure water availability for its population.
In comparison to other countries, Cuba's dam capacity per capita is indicative of its proactive approach to water resource management, which is crucial for an island nation with limited freshwater resources. This focus on infrastructure aligns with broader efforts to enhance sustainability and resilience against climate-related challenges.
Congo
In 1991, Congo ranked 122nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 3.67463 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low per capita dam capacity reflects the country's limited infrastructure development and reliance on natural water resources for its energy and irrigation needs.
The modest dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including political instability, economic challenges, and insufficient investment in energy infrastructure during this period. The country has faced numerous conflicts that have hindered the development of essential utilities, including hydroelectric projects.
Moreover, while Congo possesses significant hydroelectric potential due to its abundant river systems, the realization of this potential has been hampered by both financial constraints and governance issues. As a result, the capacity for energy generation has been underutilized, impacting overall economic growth and access to electricity for the population.
Denmark
In 1991, Denmark ranked 121st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 3.88022 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water management practices and infrastructure related to reservoirs and dams.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Denmark's geographical characteristics, as the country has a flat landscape with limited large river systems compared to other nations. Additionally, Denmark has historically focused on sustainable water management and conservation, which impacts the overall capacity of water storage systems.
Interestingly, Denmark has made significant investments in renewable energy, particularly wind energy, which has helped to reduce reliance on water reservoirs for energy generation. This shift in focus highlights the country's commitment to environmental sustainability and efficient resource management.
Czech Republic
In 1991, the Czech Republic ranked 136th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates that, during that period, there was either inadequate data or a lack of significant dam infrastructure relative to the population size.
The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including the historical context of the region following the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in 1993 and the economic transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented system. Infrastructure investments were likely focused on other pressing needs, such as industrial development and urbanization, rather than on dam construction or significant water management projects.
As a point of interest, the Czech Republic has since improved its water management systems, reflecting a growing awareness of environmental sustainability and resource management. In subsequent years, the country has invested in infrastructure that supports water conservation and flood control, which underscores the evolving priorities in environmental policy.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan ranked 127 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1991. The dam capacity per capita for Azerbaijan was recorded as null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a lack of measurable dam capacity relative to its population at that time.
This statistic can be attributed to several factors, including the country's economic conditions following its independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, which resulted in limited investment in infrastructure development. Additionally, the region faced challenges related to political instability and conflict, notably the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which diverted attention and resources away from essential infrastructure projects.
Despite the low dam capacity per capita, Azerbaijan is home to numerous rivers and water bodies, which have historically been pivotal for agriculture and irrigation. The country has since recognized the importance of improving its water management systems to support its growing population and economy.
Brazil
In 1991, Brazil ranked 18th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 3965.01 cubic meters per inhabitant. This substantial figure underscores Brazil's extensive investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which plays a critical role in the nation's energy sector.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Brazil's vast river systems, including the Amazon River and its numerous tributaries, which provide ample opportunities for hydroelectric power generation. Additionally, Brazil's reliance on renewable energy sources has led to the construction of many large dams to support its energy needs, making it one of the world's leaders in renewable energy generation.
Interestingly, Brazil's commitment to hydroelectric power has allowed it to achieve one of the highest percentages of electricity generated from renewable sources globally, often exceeding 80%. This focus on renewable energy has implications for both environmental sustainability and energy security in the region.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data