Dam capacity per capita 1990

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
30,047.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Australia flag
Australia
4,541.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,290.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
3,055.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,377.59 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
1,229.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Chile flag
Chile
841.355 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
624.223 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Cuba flag
Cuba
448.467 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Angola flag
Angola
384.489 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Austria flag
Austria
277.058 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Algeria flag
Algeria
172.871 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
166.782 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
79.615 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,033.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
734.769 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
347.061 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Botswana flag
Botswana
346.715 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
China flag
China
279.136 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Colombia flag
Colombia
246.638 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
240.773 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
176.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
74.252 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
58.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
337.576 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.52 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Benin flag
Benin
4.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo flag
Congo
3.781 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.441 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Ghana flag
Ghana
9,646.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Iraq flag
Iraq
8,634.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Iceland flag
Iceland
7,479.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Finland flag
Finland
3,730.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,880.25 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Honduras flag
Honduras
1,149.61 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,079.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Greece flag
Greece
1,059.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
718.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iran flag
Iran
297.054 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
289.588 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Ireland flag
Ireland
247.295 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
India flag
India
235.202 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Gabon flag
Gabon
223.638 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
France flag
France
173.733 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Fiji flag
Fiji
171.987 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
51.491 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Laos flag
Laos
1,630.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Kenya flag
Kenya
976.704 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
480.962 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Italy flag
Italy
153.152 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Japan flag
Japan
123.197 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Liberia flag
Liberia
107.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
96.415 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
61.193 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
51.095 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Haiti flag
Haiti
43.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Germany flag
Germany
40.521 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Guinea flag
Guinea
36.833 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Jordan flag
Jordan
28.052 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.698 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.29 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.18 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
87.71 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
7,688.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Norway flag
Norway
6,878.06 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
5,706.25 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
5,661.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
4,971.39 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Panama flag
Panama
3,545.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mali flag
Mali
1,483.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
1,249.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,213.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
North Korea flag
North Korea
845.313 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Portugal flag
Portugal
692.676 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
614.335 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Namibia flag
Namibia
517.441 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Romania flag
Romania
460.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
447.952 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Morocco flag
Morocco
443.457 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
256.164 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
238.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Peru flag
Peru
221.092 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
146.919 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
115.496 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
89.965 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Philippines flag
Philippines
86.756 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
85.462 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Poland flag
Poland
64.469 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
61.863 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
40.932 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Oman flag
Oman
21.662 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
18.86 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Niger flag
Niger
10.062 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Malawi flag
Malawi
4.374 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Maldives flag
Maldives
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Nepal flag
Nepal
4.369 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Suriname flag
Suriname
48,485.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Zambia flag
Zambia
12,988.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
9,814.26 cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
7,724.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,525.59 cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Uganda flag
Uganda
4,553.24 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,201.52 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
3,990.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
United States flag
United States
2,881.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,074.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Togo flag
Togo
429.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
317.125 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
South Korea flag
South Korea
278.664 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
257.079 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
248.562 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
91.279 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
58.113 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
52.421 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Senegal flag
Senegal
32.381 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Yemen flag
Yemen
29.258 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Singapore flag
Singapore
24.642 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
13.517 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,451.74 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,408.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Spain flag
Spain
1,223.41 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
South Africa flag
South Africa
725.55 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
498.051 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
57.075 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
438.404 cubic meters per inhabitant
163
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
8.409 cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Australia flagAustralia
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  5. #5Cameroon flagCameroon
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Chile flagChile
  8. #8Costa Rica flagCosta Rica
  9. #9Cuba flagCuba
  10. #10Angola flagAngola

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  2. #163United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  3. #162Vietnam flagVietnam
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  7. #158Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  8. #157Switzerland flagSwitzerland
  9. #156Sudan flagSudan
  10. #155State of Palestine flagState of Palestine

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In the year 1990, the metric of dam capacity per capita represented a vital indicator of water resource management and its implications for sustainability and development across the globe. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, shed light on the extent of water storage available to support agriculture, industry, and communities in various countries. By examining global trends and statistics from this year, we can gain insights into which regions were well-equipped to handle water security challenges and which were in need of improvement.

Global Leaders in Water Storage

In 1990, Suriname emerged as the unrivaled leader in dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 48,485.7 cubic meters per inhabitant. This far exceeded the global average of 1,866.34 cubic meters. Following Suriname were Canada and Zambia, with capacities of 30,047.5 and 12,988.9 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These countries benefited from extensive water resources and infrastructural investments, which enabled them to secure water supplies for their populations and industries. The high per capita figures in these nations underscored a significant advantage in terms of water availability, providing a buffer against droughts and other environmental challenges.

Regional Disparities and Water Insecurity

Conversely, numerous countries faced dire water storage challenges, with some reporting virtually no dam capacity per capita. Rwanda, Cabo Verde, Bhutan, and Belize were among those with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This stark contrast highlighted the disparities in water infrastructure development and emphasized the need for strategic investments in dam and reservoir projects. Such infrastructure is crucial not only for ensuring water security but also for supporting agricultural practices that many of these countries rely on for their economies. The lack of adequate water storage capacity posed significant risks to their sustainable development and economic resilience.

Analyzing the dam capacity per capita in 1990 within a historical context reveals interesting year-over-year changes. The average change from the previous year was a decline of 30.93 cubic meters per inhabitant, or 1.4%. Notably, some countries experienced considerable decreases, such as Suriname with a reduction of 484.80 cubic meters and Canada with 459.80 cubic meters. This downward trend in certain regions pointed to potential challenges in maintaining water storage levels, possibly due to increased demand or climatic changes affecting water availability.

Climate and Environmental Influences

The links between dam capacity per capita and climate conditions are significant. Nations like Iceland and Norway, with capacities of 7,479.8 and 6,878.06 cubic meters per inhabitant respectively, benefited from their unique geographical conditions that favored water accumulation. On the other hand, countries with minimal capacity often faced challenging climates that exacerbated water scarcity. Understanding these environmental influences is crucial for developing adaptive strategies to enhance water security and manage resources sustainably in the face of changing climate patterns.

Policy and Infrastructure Implications

From a policy perspective, the 1990 data on dam capacity per capita provided a clear call to action for governments worldwide. Countries with lower capacities needed to prioritize investments in water infrastructure to meet the rising demands of their populations and industries. International collaboration and knowledge exchange could also play a pivotal role in addressing these disparities, enabling less developed regions to benefit from the expertise and technologies of countries with advanced water management systems. By focusing on strategic infrastructural development, nations could work towards achieving long-term water security and sustainable growth.

In summary, the dam capacity per capita figures for 1990 reveal a global landscape marked by stark disparities in water resource management. While some countries showcased exceptional water storage capabilities, others faced critical challenges. Understanding these trends and their underlying causes is essential for guiding future policy decisions and ensuring equitable access to water resources for all populations. As we look to the future, prioritizing sustainable water management will be key to addressing the ongoing challenges posed by both natural and human-induced factors.

Insights by country

1

Turkmenistan

In 1990, Turkmenistan ranked 162nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to the population, reflecting challenges in the country's resource management.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including the country's geographic characteristics, economic conditions, and historical context. Turkmenistan, being part of the arid Central Asian region, faces inherent limitations in water resources, which are further complicated by inadequate investment in water management infrastructure following its independence from the Soviet Union.

Moreover, the reliance on the Amu Darya and Murghab rivers for water supply highlights the ongoing challenges of water scarcity and the need for sustainable management practices. This situation is crucial as water resource management remains a pivotal issue for the country, impacting agriculture, industry, and overall economic development.

2

South Korea

In 1990, South Korea ranked 65th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 278.664 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is essential for supporting its industrialized economy and urban population.

Several factors contribute to this statistic, including South Korea's rapid industrialization during the late 20th century, which increased the demand for water resources for agriculture, industry, and domestic use. Additionally, the government has historically prioritized large-scale infrastructure projects to manage water supply and mitigate flooding, resulting in the construction of numerous dams.

Furthermore, South Korea's geography, characterized by mountainous terrain and seasonal rainfall, necessitates effective water management strategies. The nation has implemented advanced technologies in water conservation and management, underscoring its commitment to sustainable development and resource efficiency.

3

Libya

In 1990, Libya ranked 90th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 87.7096 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive investment in water infrastructure to support its largely arid environment and the needs of its population.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Libya's significant engineering efforts, particularly the Great Man-Made River project, which aimed to provide water from aquifers in the Sahara Desert to coastal cities. This ambitious project has been crucial in addressing water scarcity issues in a region characterized by low rainfall and high evaporation rates.

Additionally, Libya's ranking and dam capacity highlight the importance of water management in a country where access to freshwater is vital for agriculture, domestic use, and industrial activities. The challenges posed by climate change and ongoing socio-political issues may impact future water availability and infrastructure sustainability.

4

Botswana

In 1990, Botswana ranked 59th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 346.715 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts in managing its water resources, which are crucial for both agricultural and domestic use.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Botswana's strategic investments in water infrastructure, particularly in response to the challenges posed by its semi-arid climate. These investments are necessary for ensuring water availability in a region that experiences variable rainfall patterns.

Additionally, Botswana's commitment to sustainable water management practices has contributed to its capacity rankings. This focus is essential for supporting the country's population and fostering economic activities, particularly in sectors such as agriculture and tourism, which rely heavily on water resources.

5

Benin

In 1990, Benin ranked 119th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 4.44951 cubic meters per inhabitant. This metric reflects the storage capacity available for water management and is crucial for agricultural, industrial, and domestic uses.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Benin can be attributed to several factors, including limited infrastructure investment, a reliance on rain-fed agriculture, and challenges in water resource management. The country's economic conditions and historical context have played a significant role in shaping its water storage capabilities.

Interestingly, this statistic highlights the ongoing challenges Benin faces in ensuring water security for its population, particularly in the context of climate variability and the need for sustainable development in the region.

6

Nigeria

Nigeria ranked 53rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1990. The dam capacity per capita for Nigeria during this year was 447.952 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant level of water storage infrastructure relative to its population at that time.

This capacity can be attributed to Nigeria's extensive river systems, including the Niger and Benue rivers, which have facilitated the construction of numerous dams for irrigation, hydroelectric power generation, and flood control. Moreover, the country's investment in water infrastructure has aimed to meet agricultural demands and improve access to clean water.

Interestingly, Nigeria's dam capacity per capita reflects broader challenges in water management and distribution. Despite a relatively high dam capacity, issues such as infrastructure decay, regional disparities, and population growth have impacted the effective use of these resources, leading to ongoing water scarcity in certain areas.

7

Argentina

In 1990, Argentina ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 3,290.96 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for supporting its agricultural sector and providing water for urban populations.

The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Argentina's extensive river systems, including the Paraná and Colorado rivers, which have facilitated the construction of large reservoirs. Additionally, the country's focus on hydroelectric power generation has further contributed to the development of dam infrastructure, ensuring a reliable energy source while managing water resources effectively.

Interestingly, Argentina's dam capacity per capita is indicative of its broader resource management strategies, which have historically prioritized sustainable practices and the efficient use of natural resources. This capacity also plays a vital role in mitigating the impacts of droughts and ensuring water availability during periods of scarcity, a crucial factor given the variability of its climate.

8

Nepal

Nepal ranked 121 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1990, with a capacity of 4.36885 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure and investment in water management and energy production at that time.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including geographical challenges, such as mountainous terrain that complicates the construction of large dams, and economic constraints that limit the government's ability to invest in large-scale hydropower projects. Additionally, Nepal's focus on agricultural development often diverted attention and resources away from water infrastructure.

Despite these challenges, Nepal is endowed with significant hydropower potential, which has the capacity to produce around 83,000 megawatts of energy, highlighting the future opportunities for development in the sector. The country's strategic initiatives in later years have aimed at harnessing this potential to improve dam capacity and overall water management.

9

Poland

In 1990, Poland had a dam capacity per capita of 64.4691 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 95th out of 164 countries in this metric. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water resource management and infrastructure, which was crucial during a period of economic transition following the fall of communism.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Poland's geographical features, including numerous rivers and lakes, which facilitate the construction of dams for hydroelectric power and flood control. Additionally, the country's focus on developing renewable energy sources during this time contributed to enhancing its dam infrastructure.

As a member of the European Union since 2004, Poland has since seen further investment in water management projects, leading to improvements in its overall dam capacity and water infrastructure. Interestingly, Poland's dam capacity per capita is lower than some of its neighbors, reflecting varying national priorities in water resource development and energy production.

10

Vietnam

In 1990, Vietnam ranked 55th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 438.404 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's growing infrastructure and investment in hydroelectric power, which has been a significant focus for Vietnam as it seeks to harness its abundant water resources for energy production.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Vietnam's extensive river systems, including the Mekong and Red Rivers, which provide ample opportunities for dam construction. Additionally, the government's emphasis on developing renewable energy sources during the late 20th century contributed to this capacity, aiming to support both economic growth and energy independence.

Furthermore, the country's commitment to improving rural electrification and agricultural irrigation has driven the enhancement of water storage and management systems. As of the early 1990s, Vietnam was in the process of transitioning from a centrally planned economy to a more market-oriented one, which facilitated increased investment in infrastructure projects, including dams.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts