Dam capacity per capita 1990
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 30,047.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Australia | 4,541.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 3,290.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3,055.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Cameroon | 1,377.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 1,229.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Chile | 841.355 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Costa Rica | 624.223 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Cuba | 448.467 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Angola | 384.489 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Austria | 277.058 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Algeria | 172.871 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Afghanistan | 166.782 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Antigua and Barbuda | 79.615 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Brazil | 4,033.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Bulgaria | 734.769 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Cyprus | 347.061 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Botswana | 346.715 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | China | 279.136 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Colombia | 246.638 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Dominican Republic | 240.773 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Brunei Darussalam | 176.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Bolivia | 74.252 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Bangladesh | 58.02 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Burkina Faso | 337.576 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 14.52 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Benin | 4.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo | 3.781 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.441 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Ghana | 9,646.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Iraq | 8,634.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Iceland | 7,479.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Finland | 3,730.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Egypt | 2,880.25 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Honduras | 1,149.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Guyana | 1,079.02 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Greece | 1,059.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | El Salvador | 718.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Iran | 297.054 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Eswatini | 289.588 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Ireland | 247.295 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | India | 235.202 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Gabon | 223.638 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | France | 173.733 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Fiji | 171.987 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Ecuador | 51.491 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Laos | 1,630.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Kenya | 976.704 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lesotho | 480.962 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Italy | 153.152 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Japan | 123.197 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Liberia | 107.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Indonesia | 96.415 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Lebanon | 61.193 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Guatemala | 51.095 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Haiti | 43.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Germany | 40.521 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Guinea | 36.833 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Jordan | 28.052 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Hungary | 24.698 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Denmark | 3.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Jamaica | 2.29 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Grenada | 0.18 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 87.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 7,688.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Norway | 6,878.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Paraguay | 5,706.25 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Mozambique | 5,661.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | New Zealand | 4,971.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Panama | 3,545.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Mali | 1,483.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Malaysia | 1,249.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Mexico | 1,213.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | North Korea | 845.313 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Portugal | 692.676 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Netherlands | 614.335 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Namibia | 517.441 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Romania | 460.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Nigeria | 447.952 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Morocco | 443.457 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Mauritania | 256.164 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Pakistan | 238.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Peru | 221.092 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Luxembourg | 146.919 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Mongolia | 115.496 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Myanmar | 89.965 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Philippines | 86.756 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Papua New Guinea | 85.462 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Poland | 64.469 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Mauritius | 61.863 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Madagascar | 40.932 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Oman | 21.662 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Saint Lucia | 18.86 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Niger | 10.062 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Malawi | 4.374 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Nepal | 4.369 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Suriname | 48,485.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Zambia | 12,988.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Zimbabwe | 9,814.26 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Venezuela | 7,724.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Uruguay | 5,525.59 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Uganda | 4,553.24 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Sweden | 4,201.52 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Tanzania | 3,990.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | United States | 2,881.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,074.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Togo | 429.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sao Tome and Principe | 317.125 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | South Korea | 278.664 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Sri Lanka | 257.079 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Tunisia | 248.562 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | United Kingdom | 91.279 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Saudi Arabia | 58.113 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Sierra Leone | 52.421 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Senegal | 32.381 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Yemen | 29.258 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Singapore | 24.642 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 13.517 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Turkey | 1,451.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Thailand | 1,408.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Spain | 1,223.41 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | South Africa | 725.55 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Switzerland | 498.051 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Trinidad and Tobago | 57.075 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Vietnam | 438.404 cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | United Arab Emirates | 8.409 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Uzbekistan
- #163
United Arab Emirates
- #162
Vietnam
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Trinidad and Tobago
- #158
Tajikistan
- #157
Switzerland
- #156
Sudan
- #155
State of Palestine
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In the year 1990, the metric of dam capacity per capita represented a vital indicator of water resource management and its implications for sustainability and development across the globe. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, shed light on the extent of water storage available to support agriculture, industry, and communities in various countries. By examining global trends and statistics from this year, we can gain insights into which regions were well-equipped to handle water security challenges and which were in need of improvement.
Global Leaders in Water Storage
In 1990, Suriname emerged as the unrivaled leader in dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 48,485.7 cubic meters per inhabitant. This far exceeded the global average of 1,866.34 cubic meters. Following Suriname were Canada and Zambia, with capacities of 30,047.5 and 12,988.9 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These countries benefited from extensive water resources and infrastructural investments, which enabled them to secure water supplies for their populations and industries. The high per capita figures in these nations underscored a significant advantage in terms of water availability, providing a buffer against droughts and other environmental challenges.
Regional Disparities and Water Insecurity
Conversely, numerous countries faced dire water storage challenges, with some reporting virtually no dam capacity per capita. Rwanda, Cabo Verde, Bhutan, and Belize were among those with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This stark contrast highlighted the disparities in water infrastructure development and emphasized the need for strategic investments in dam and reservoir projects. Such infrastructure is crucial not only for ensuring water security but also for supporting agricultural practices that many of these countries rely on for their economies. The lack of adequate water storage capacity posed significant risks to their sustainable development and economic resilience.
Historical Context and Trends
Analyzing the dam capacity per capita in 1990 within a historical context reveals interesting year-over-year changes. The average change from the previous year was a decline of 30.93 cubic meters per inhabitant, or 1.4%. Notably, some countries experienced considerable decreases, such as Suriname with a reduction of 484.80 cubic meters and Canada with 459.80 cubic meters. This downward trend in certain regions pointed to potential challenges in maintaining water storage levels, possibly due to increased demand or climatic changes affecting water availability.
Climate and Environmental Influences
The links between dam capacity per capita and climate conditions are significant. Nations like Iceland and Norway, with capacities of 7,479.8 and 6,878.06 cubic meters per inhabitant respectively, benefited from their unique geographical conditions that favored water accumulation. On the other hand, countries with minimal capacity often faced challenging climates that exacerbated water scarcity. Understanding these environmental influences is crucial for developing adaptive strategies to enhance water security and manage resources sustainably in the face of changing climate patterns.
Policy and Infrastructure Implications
From a policy perspective, the 1990 data on dam capacity per capita provided a clear call to action for governments worldwide. Countries with lower capacities needed to prioritize investments in water infrastructure to meet the rising demands of their populations and industries. International collaboration and knowledge exchange could also play a pivotal role in addressing these disparities, enabling less developed regions to benefit from the expertise and technologies of countries with advanced water management systems. By focusing on strategic infrastructural development, nations could work towards achieving long-term water security and sustainable growth.
In summary, the dam capacity per capita figures for 1990 reveal a global landscape marked by stark disparities in water resource management. While some countries showcased exceptional water storage capabilities, others faced critical challenges. Understanding these trends and their underlying causes is essential for guiding future policy decisions and ensuring equitable access to water resources for all populations. As we look to the future, prioritizing sustainable water management will be key to addressing the ongoing challenges posed by both natural and human-induced factors.
Insights by country
Turkmenistan
In 1990, Turkmenistan ranked 162nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to the population, reflecting challenges in the country's resource management.
The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including the country's geographic characteristics, economic conditions, and historical context. Turkmenistan, being part of the arid Central Asian region, faces inherent limitations in water resources, which are further complicated by inadequate investment in water management infrastructure following its independence from the Soviet Union.
Moreover, the reliance on the Amu Darya and Murghab rivers for water supply highlights the ongoing challenges of water scarcity and the need for sustainable management practices. This situation is crucial as water resource management remains a pivotal issue for the country, impacting agriculture, industry, and overall economic development.
South Korea
In 1990, South Korea ranked 65th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 278.664 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is essential for supporting its industrialized economy and urban population.
Several factors contribute to this statistic, including South Korea's rapid industrialization during the late 20th century, which increased the demand for water resources for agriculture, industry, and domestic use. Additionally, the government has historically prioritized large-scale infrastructure projects to manage water supply and mitigate flooding, resulting in the construction of numerous dams.
Furthermore, South Korea's geography, characterized by mountainous terrain and seasonal rainfall, necessitates effective water management strategies. The nation has implemented advanced technologies in water conservation and management, underscoring its commitment to sustainable development and resource efficiency.
Libya
In 1990, Libya ranked 90th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 87.7096 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive investment in water infrastructure to support its largely arid environment and the needs of its population.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Libya's significant engineering efforts, particularly the Great Man-Made River project, which aimed to provide water from aquifers in the Sahara Desert to coastal cities. This ambitious project has been crucial in addressing water scarcity issues in a region characterized by low rainfall and high evaporation rates.
Additionally, Libya's ranking and dam capacity highlight the importance of water management in a country where access to freshwater is vital for agriculture, domestic use, and industrial activities. The challenges posed by climate change and ongoing socio-political issues may impact future water availability and infrastructure sustainability.
Botswana
In 1990, Botswana ranked 59th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 346.715 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts in managing its water resources, which are crucial for both agricultural and domestic use.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Botswana's strategic investments in water infrastructure, particularly in response to the challenges posed by its semi-arid climate. These investments are necessary for ensuring water availability in a region that experiences variable rainfall patterns.
Additionally, Botswana's commitment to sustainable water management practices has contributed to its capacity rankings. This focus is essential for supporting the country's population and fostering economic activities, particularly in sectors such as agriculture and tourism, which rely heavily on water resources.
Benin
In 1990, Benin ranked 119th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable figure of 4.44951 cubic meters per inhabitant. This metric reflects the storage capacity available for water management and is crucial for agricultural, industrial, and domestic uses.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Benin can be attributed to several factors, including limited infrastructure investment, a reliance on rain-fed agriculture, and challenges in water resource management. The country's economic conditions and historical context have played a significant role in shaping its water storage capabilities.
Interestingly, this statistic highlights the ongoing challenges Benin faces in ensuring water security for its population, particularly in the context of climate variability and the need for sustainable development in the region.
Nigeria
Nigeria ranked 53rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1990. The dam capacity per capita for Nigeria during this year was 447.952 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant level of water storage infrastructure relative to its population at that time.
This capacity can be attributed to Nigeria's extensive river systems, including the Niger and Benue rivers, which have facilitated the construction of numerous dams for irrigation, hydroelectric power generation, and flood control. Moreover, the country's investment in water infrastructure has aimed to meet agricultural demands and improve access to clean water.
Interestingly, Nigeria's dam capacity per capita reflects broader challenges in water management and distribution. Despite a relatively high dam capacity, issues such as infrastructure decay, regional disparities, and population growth have impacted the effective use of these resources, leading to ongoing water scarcity in certain areas.
Argentina
In 1990, Argentina ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 3,290.96 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for supporting its agricultural sector and providing water for urban populations.
The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Argentina's extensive river systems, including the Paraná and Colorado rivers, which have facilitated the construction of large reservoirs. Additionally, the country's focus on hydroelectric power generation has further contributed to the development of dam infrastructure, ensuring a reliable energy source while managing water resources effectively.
Interestingly, Argentina's dam capacity per capita is indicative of its broader resource management strategies, which have historically prioritized sustainable practices and the efficient use of natural resources. This capacity also plays a vital role in mitigating the impacts of droughts and ensuring water availability during periods of scarcity, a crucial factor given the variability of its climate.
Nepal
Nepal ranked 121 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1990, with a capacity of 4.36885 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure and investment in water management and energy production at that time.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including geographical challenges, such as mountainous terrain that complicates the construction of large dams, and economic constraints that limit the government's ability to invest in large-scale hydropower projects. Additionally, Nepal's focus on agricultural development often diverted attention and resources away from water infrastructure.
Despite these challenges, Nepal is endowed with significant hydropower potential, which has the capacity to produce around 83,000 megawatts of energy, highlighting the future opportunities for development in the sector. The country's strategic initiatives in later years have aimed at harnessing this potential to improve dam capacity and overall water management.
Poland
In 1990, Poland had a dam capacity per capita of 64.4691 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 95th out of 164 countries in this metric. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water resource management and infrastructure, which was crucial during a period of economic transition following the fall of communism.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Poland's geographical features, including numerous rivers and lakes, which facilitate the construction of dams for hydroelectric power and flood control. Additionally, the country's focus on developing renewable energy sources during this time contributed to enhancing its dam infrastructure.
As a member of the European Union since 2004, Poland has since seen further investment in water management projects, leading to improvements in its overall dam capacity and water infrastructure. Interestingly, Poland's dam capacity per capita is lower than some of its neighbors, reflecting varying national priorities in water resource development and energy production.
Vietnam
In 1990, Vietnam ranked 55th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 438.404 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's growing infrastructure and investment in hydroelectric power, which has been a significant focus for Vietnam as it seeks to harness its abundant water resources for energy production.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Vietnam's extensive river systems, including the Mekong and Red Rivers, which provide ample opportunities for dam construction. Additionally, the government's emphasis on developing renewable energy sources during the late 20th century contributed to this capacity, aiming to support both economic growth and energy independence.
Furthermore, the country's commitment to improving rural electrification and agricultural irrigation has driven the enhancement of water storage and management systems. As of the early 1990s, Vietnam was in the process of transitioning from a centrally planned economy to a more market-oriented one, which facilitated increased investment in infrastructure projects, including dams.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data