Dam capacity per capita 2002
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 26,662.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Iceland | 8,018.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Norway | 7,285.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Paraguay | 6,372.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Nicaragua | 6,214.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Russia | 5,492.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | New Zealand | 4,274.16 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Mozambique | 3,910.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Panama | 2,782.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Mexico | 1,477.12 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Portugal | 1,117.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Mali | 1,107.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Malaysia | 926.369 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | North Macedonia | 790.51 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | North Korea | 745.339 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Morocco | 582.51 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Netherlands | 566.919 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Romania | 508.148 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Nigeria | 379.606 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Namibia | 374.891 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Republic of Moldova | 272.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Peru | 211.551 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Mauritania | 182.571 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Pakistan | 169.994 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Lithuania | 143.784 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Luxembourg | 138.892 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Mongolia | 99.997 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Philippines | 85.531 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Myanmar | 82.283 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Poland | 72.193 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Libya | 70.781 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Mauritius | 54.591 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Oman | 33.323 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Madagascar | 28.118 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Saint Lucia | 16.085 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Niger | 6.751 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Malawi | 3.515 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Nepal | 3.368 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Malta | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Suriname | 40,277.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Zambia | 9,497.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Zimbabwe | 8,263.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Ghana | 7,163.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Venezuela | 6,036.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Iraq | 5,836.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Uruguay | 5,231.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Kazakhstan | 5,106.25 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,593.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Tajikistan | 4,435.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Sweden | 4,029 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Australia | 3,969.63 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Brazil | 3,905.65 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Finland | 3,577.12 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Argentina | 3,458.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Uganda | 3,133.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Tanzania | 2,884.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Azerbaijan | 2,587.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | United States | 2,563.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Turkey | 2,326.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Egypt | 2,206.17 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Côte d'Ivoire | 1,996.48 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Lesotho | 1,413.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Albania | 1,285.86 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Spain | 1,266.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Laos | 1,263.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Thailand | 1,225.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Greece | 1,131.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Guyana | 1,059.58 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Turkmenistan | 1,041.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Cameroon | 992.693 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Ukraine | 969.652 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Syrian Arab Republic | 944.185 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Uzbekistan | 872.442 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Honduras | 836.543 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Bulgaria | 829.108 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Georgia | 827.042 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Chile | 759.358 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kenya | 758.924 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 695.415 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | El Salvador | 647.944 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | South Africa | 629.169 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Ecuador | 580.874 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Vietnam | 559.147 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Eswatini | 552.178 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Costa Rica | 482.535 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Switzerland | 459.351 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Armenia | 453.887 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Cuba | 450.205 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Latvia | 434.811 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Burkina Faso | 409.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | China | 398.987 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Iran | 389.007 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | South Korea | 342.501 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Slovakia | 321.086 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Botswana | 317.353 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Togo | 317.27 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Czech Republic | 310.983 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Sri Lanka | 300.014 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Cyprus | 286.014 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Colombia | 275.562 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Austria | 263.276 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Sao Tome and Principe | 260.135 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Angola | 257.981 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Dominican Republic | 255.721 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Tunisia | 253.359 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Japan | 244.459 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Croatia | 223.421 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Ireland | 221.207 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Guinea | 211.781 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | India | 205.311 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Italy | 174.982 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Algeria | 171.846 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | France | 165.453 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Gabon | 163.552 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Fiji | 155.003 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Belarus | 135.272 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Brunei Darussalam | 132.353 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Estonia | 132.301 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Indonesia | 103.656 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Afghanistan | 93.975 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Saudi Arabia | 55.606 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | 54.209 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Trinidad and Tobago | 53.656 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Sierra Leone | 44.253 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | 23.886 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | United Kingdom | 88.536 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Ethiopia | 78.507 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Liberia | 77.098 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Antigua and Barbuda | 65.181 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Bolivia | 63.049 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Lebanon | 49.289 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Bangladesh | 46.619 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Germany | 41.12 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Guatemala | 37.692 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Haiti | 34.504 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Jordan | 31.948 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Hungary | 25.29 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Yemen | 20.514 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Eritrea | 18.433 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Singapore | 18.062 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Slovenia | 16.821 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | United Arab Emirates | 15.344 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Belgium | 13.965 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 11.647 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Belize | 6.64 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Denmark | 3.72 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Benin | 3.062 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo | 2.686 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Jamaica | 2.064 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 0.984 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Grenada | 0.203 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Cambodia | 0.078 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Bahrain | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Guinea-Bissau
- #158
Cabo Verde
- #157
Bhutan
- #156
Bahrain
- #155
Cambodia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2002, "Dam capacity per capita" emerged as a crucial metric for evaluating water resource management across the globe. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, provides insight into how different countries manage their water storage capabilities. Understanding dam capacity is vitally important, as it directly impacts water security, agriculture, industry, and community development. By analyzing the data from 2002, we can explore the nuances of water management practices worldwide and their implications for sustainability and economic growth.
Global Landscape of Dam Capacity in 2002
The global landscape of dam capacity per capita in 2002 was diverse, with countries displaying significant variation in their water storage capabilities. Out of the 160 countries with available data, the average dam capacity per capita was 1539.18 cubic meters, with a median value of 286.01 cubic meters. The top three nations—Suriname, Canada, and Zambia—boasted impressive capacities of 40,277.8, 26,662.2, and 9,497.92 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. This high capacity reflects their abundant freshwater resources and advanced water management systems, crucial for supporting both domestic needs and economic activities.
Regional Disparities and Environmental Factors
The disparities in dam capacity per capita highlight significant regional differences, often influenced by geographical and environmental factors. Countries like Suriname and Canada benefit from vast natural water reserves and relatively low population densities, enabling them to maintain high per capita capacity. In contrast, nations with 0 cubic meters per inhabitant, such as Rwanda, Papua New Guinea, and Maldives, face challenges due to limited natural water resources, high population density, or lack of infrastructure investment. These disparities emphasize the need for region-specific strategies to improve water security and resource management.
Notable Trends and Year-over-Year Changes
Examining year-over-year changes reveals interesting trends and shifts in dam capacity per capita. While the average change was a decrease of 0.3%, certain countries experienced significant increases. Portugal led with a remarkable 54.6% rise, translating to an additional 394.47 cubic meters per inhabitant. This increase reflects recent investments in water infrastructure aimed at enhancing agricultural productivity and securing water supplies amid growing demand. Mexico and Tunisia also saw substantial increases of 32.5% and 11.8%, respectively, indicating their commitment to improving water management systems.
Challenges and Opportunities in Water Resource Management
Despite advancements in some regions, global challenges in water resource management persist. Countries like Suriname, Zambia, and Canada recorded decreases in dam capacity per capita, underscoring the impact of climate change, aging infrastructure, and growing population pressures. Suriname, for instance, saw a 2.0% reduction, highlighting the need for sustainable management practices and infrastructure upgrades to maintain its high capacity. Conversely, these challenges present opportunities for innovation and international cooperation. By investing in modern technologies and sharing best practices, countries can enhance their water management systems, ensuring long-term sustainability and resilience.
Future Implications for Global Water Security
The data from 2002 underscores the critical role of effective water management in achieving global sustainability goals. As populations grow and climate change intensifies, the demand for reliable water resources will only increase. Countries with higher dam capacities per capita are better positioned to meet these challenges, providing a stable foundation for economic development and community well-being. Moving forward, international collaboration and targeted investments in water infrastructure will be vital in bridging the gap between high-capacity and low-capacity nations, fostering a more equitable and sustainable future for all.
The "Dam capacity per capita" metric in 2002 offers valuable insights into the state of global water resource management during that time. By understanding the factors influencing capacity variations, such as geographical conditions, policy decisions, and technological advancements, stakeholders can develop more effective strategies for ensuring water security and promoting sustainable development worldwide.
Insights by country
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked 124th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 2002. The country had a dam capacity of 44.2528 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a limited but existing infrastructure for water storage and management relative to its population size.
This statistic reflects the challenges faced by Sierra Leone in developing its water resources, particularly in the aftermath of a devastating civil war that ended in 2002. The war severely impacted the country's infrastructure, including water supply systems, which hindered investments in dam construction and maintenance.
Factors contributing to the low dam capacity per capita may include historical neglect of infrastructure, economic constraints, and a focus on immediate humanitarian needs over long-term water resource management. Additionally, Sierra Leone's reliance on surface water sources, combined with seasonal variations in rainfall, further complicates the effective management of its water resources.
Afghanistan
In 2002, Afghanistan ranked 108th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country had a dam capacity of 93.9746 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting the limited infrastructure and challenges facing water management in the region.
This relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including decades of conflict, underinvestment in infrastructure, and the geographical challenges of managing water resources in a predominantly mountainous terrain. The lack of effective governance and ongoing instability further hindered the development of water storage and distribution systems.
Additionally, Afghanistan's water resource management is complicated by its reliance on snowmelt and seasonal rainfall, which can be unpredictable. As a result, the country faces significant challenges in ensuring water security for its population, particularly in rural areas where access to water infrastructure is often limited.
Hungary
In 2002, Hungary ranked 131st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 25.2898 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure for water management, which is crucial for meeting the demands of agriculture, industry, and domestic use.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Hungary can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographical characteristics and historical investments in water infrastructure. The Danube River, which flows through Hungary, provides significant water resources; however, the management and storage of these resources within dams may not have been prioritized historically compared to other European nations.
Moreover, Hungary's focus on preserving its natural landscapes and ecosystems may have limited the construction of new large dams, impacting the per capita capacity. In contrast, countries with higher dam capacities often have a greater emphasis on large-scale water infrastructure projects to support extensive agricultural and industrial needs.
Eritrea
Eritrea ranks 134th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita for the year 2002. The dam capacity per capita in Eritrea is recorded at 18.4331 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting the country's limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population size.
This relatively low figure can be attributed to several factors, including the country's ongoing developmental challenges, limited financial resources, and the impacts of prolonged conflict that have hindered investment in essential infrastructure such as dams and water management systems. Additionally, Eritrea's arid climate poses challenges for water conservation and storage.
In comparison to other nations, this statistic highlights the significant water scarcity issues faced by Eritrea, which is crucial for agricultural development and overall public health. Access to adequate water resources remains a critical concern, affecting both economic activities and the quality of life for its citizens.
Estonia
In the year 2002, Estonia ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 132.301 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure for water management and storage, which is vital for both agriculture and urban development.
Estonia's dam capacity per capita can be attributed to its geographical features, including numerous rivers and lakes, which provide suitable sites for dam construction. Additionally, the country has invested in water management systems to support both its growing population and agricultural needs, particularly in the context of its transition from a Soviet republic to an independent nation.
Moreover, Estonia's position in the European Union has encouraged investment in infrastructure, including water management projects. The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita also indicates potential areas for improvement in water resource management, reflecting broader trends in environmental sustainability and climate change adaptation across Europe.
Gabon
In 2002, Gabon ranked 99th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 163.552 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure, which is crucial given Gabon's relatively low population density and abundant water resources.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Gabon's extensive river systems, such as the Ogooué River, which provides ample opportunities for hydroelectric development. Additionally, the country's government has prioritized energy projects to support its economic growth and reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
Furthermore, Gabon's focus on renewable energy sources is aligned with global trends towards sustainability and environmental conservation. As a rich resource country, Gabon’s ability to harness its water resources effectively can lead to both energy independence and improved living standards for its citizens.
Canada
In 2002, Canada achieved a remarkable position, ranking second out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive value of 26,662.2 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects Canada's extensive network of rivers and lakes, as well as its significant investment in hydropower infrastructure.
The substantial dam capacity is primarily driven by Canada’s vast geographical landscape, which includes numerous freshwater resources. The country has a strong emphasis on renewable energy, particularly hydropower, which is a major contributor to its electricity generation, accounting for approximately 60% of the total electricity produced.
Moreover, Canada's commitment to sustainable energy practices and its hydrological capabilities are further enhanced by initiatives to manage water resources effectively. This focus on renewable energy not only supports the domestic energy needs but also positions Canada as a leader in environmental stewardship on the global stage.
Finland
In 2002, Finland ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 3577.12 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects Finland's extensive network of lakes and rivers, which has been harnessed for hydroelectric power generation and water management.
The country's significant investment in renewable energy sources, particularly hydropower, has contributed to its ability to maintain such a high dam capacity. With over 1,200 dams constructed across its waterways, Finland effectively utilizes its natural resources to meet energy demands, while also facilitating flood control and irrigation.
Additionally, Finland's commitment to sustainable development and environmental conservation has ensured that its water resources are managed efficiently, allowing for both economic growth and ecological preservation. As part of its national strategy, the country continues to explore innovations in water management and hydropower technology to further enhance its dam capacity and overall energy sustainability.
Norway
In 2002, Norway ranked 6th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive value of 7285.32 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects Norway's extensive investment in hydropower, which is a significant component of its energy landscape.
The country's topography, characterized by numerous rivers and waterfalls, facilitates the construction of dams and hydropower plants, enhancing its ability to generate renewable energy. Moreover, the emphasis on sustainable energy practices has made hydropower a cornerstone of Norway's electricity supply, contributing to its status as one of the world's leading producers of renewable energy.
In addition to its high dam capacity per capita, Norway also benefits from a strong environmental policy framework and significant government support for energy innovation. This focus on renewable energy not only serves domestic needs but also allows Norway to export electricity, further solidifying its role in the global energy market.
Maldives
In the year 2002, Maldives ranked 156th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the limited infrastructure for large-scale water storage and management in the country, which is predominantly composed of low-lying islands.
The absence of dam capacity is largely due to the Maldives' geographical characteristics, where the focus has historically been on maintaining natural water bodies and managing freshwater resources rather than constructing large dams. Additionally, the nation's reliance on groundwater and rainwater harvesting for its water supply further diminishes the need for extensive dam infrastructure.
In a broader context, this statistic reflects challenges related to climate change and rising sea levels, which pose significant risks to the Maldives' freshwater resources. The country is also facing increasing pressures from tourism and population growth, which may exacerbate issues related to water scarcity and infrastructure development in the future.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data