Dam capacity per capita 2002

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
26,662.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Iceland flag
Iceland
8,018.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Norway flag
Norway
7,285.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
6,372.73 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
6,214.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Russia flag
Russia
5,492.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
4,274.16 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
3,910.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Panama flag
Panama
2,782.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,477.12 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Portugal flag
Portugal
1,117.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Mali flag
Mali
1,107.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
926.369 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
790.51 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
North Korea flag
North Korea
745.339 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Morocco flag
Morocco
582.51 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
566.919 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Romania flag
Romania
508.148 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
379.606 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Namibia flag
Namibia
374.891 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
272.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Peru flag
Peru
211.551 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
182.571 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
169.994 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
143.784 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
138.892 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
99.997 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Philippines flag
Philippines
85.531 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
82.283 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Poland flag
Poland
72.193 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Libya flag
Libya
70.781 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
54.591 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Oman flag
Oman
33.323 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
28.118 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
16.085 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Niger flag
Niger
6.751 cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Malawi flag
Malawi
3.515 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Nepal flag
Nepal
3.368 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Maldives flag
Maldives
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Malta flag
Malta
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Suriname flag
Suriname
40,277.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Zambia flag
Zambia
9,497.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
8,263.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Ghana flag
Ghana
7,163.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
6,036.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Iraq flag
Iraq
5,836.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,231.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
5,106.25 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
4,593.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
4,435.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,029 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Australia flag
Australia
3,969.63 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,905.65 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Finland flag
Finland
3,577.12 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,458.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Uganda flag
Uganda
3,133.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
2,884.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
2,587.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
United States flag
United States
2,563.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Turkey flag
Turkey
2,326.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,206.17 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
1,996.48 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
1,413.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Albania flag
Albania
1,285.86 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Spain flag
Spain
1,266.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Laos flag
Laos
1,263.61 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,225.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Greece flag
Greece
1,131.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,059.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
1,041.94 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
992.693 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
969.652 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
944.185 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
872.442 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Honduras flag
Honduras
836.543 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
829.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Georgia flag
Georgia
827.042 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Chile flag
Chile
759.358 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kenya flag
Kenya
758.924 cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
695.415 cubic meters per inhabitant
82
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
647.944 cubic meters per inhabitant
83
South Africa flag
South Africa
629.169 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
580.874 cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
559.147 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
552.178 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
482.535 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
459.351 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Armenia flag
Armenia
453.887 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Cuba flag
Cuba
450.205 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Latvia flag
Latvia
434.811 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
409.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
China flag
China
398.987 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Iran flag
Iran
389.007 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
South Korea flag
South Korea
342.501 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
321.086 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Botswana flag
Botswana
317.353 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Togo flag
Togo
317.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
310.983 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
300.014 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
286.014 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Colombia flag
Colombia
275.562 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Austria flag
Austria
263.276 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
260.135 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Angola flag
Angola
257.981 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
255.721 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
253.359 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Japan flag
Japan
244.459 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Croatia flag
Croatia
223.421 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Ireland flag
Ireland
221.207 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Guinea flag
Guinea
211.781 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
India flag
India
205.311 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Italy flag
Italy
174.982 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Algeria flag
Algeria
171.846 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
France flag
France
165.453 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Gabon flag
Gabon
163.552 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Fiji flag
Fiji
155.003 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Belarus flag
Belarus
135.272 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
132.353 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Estonia flag
Estonia
132.301 cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
103.656 cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
93.975 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
55.606 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
54.209 cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
53.656 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
44.253 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
23.886 cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
88.536 cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
78.507 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Liberia flag
Liberia
77.098 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
65.181 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
63.049 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
49.289 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
46.619 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Germany flag
Germany
41.12 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
37.692 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Haiti flag
Haiti
34.504 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Jordan flag
Jordan
31.948 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Hungary flag
Hungary
25.29 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Yemen flag
Yemen
20.514 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
18.433 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Singapore flag
Singapore
18.062 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
16.821 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
15.344 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Belgium flag
Belgium
13.965 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
11.647 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Belize flag
Belize
6.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.72 cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Benin flag
Benin
3.062 cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Congo flag
Congo
2.686 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.064 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
0.984 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.203 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0.078 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Iceland flagIceland
  3. #3Norway flagNorway
  4. #4Paraguay flagParaguay
  5. #5Nicaragua flagNicaragua
  6. #6Russia flagRussia
  7. #7New Zealand flagNew Zealand
  8. #8Mozambique flagMozambique
  9. #9Panama flagPanama
  10. #10Mexico flagMexico

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Sudan flagSudan
  2. #163State of Palestine flagState of Palestine
  3. #162Somalia flagSomalia
  4. #161Rwanda flagRwanda
  5. #160Papua New Guinea flagPapua New Guinea
  6. #159Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  7. #158Cabo Verde flagCabo Verde
  8. #157Bhutan flagBhutan
  9. #156Bahrain flagBahrain
  10. #155Cambodia flagCambodia

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 2002, "Dam capacity per capita" emerged as a crucial metric for evaluating water resource management across the globe. This statistic, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, provides insight into how different countries manage their water storage capabilities. Understanding dam capacity is vitally important, as it directly impacts water security, agriculture, industry, and community development. By analyzing the data from 2002, we can explore the nuances of water management practices worldwide and their implications for sustainability and economic growth.

Global Landscape of Dam Capacity in 2002

The global landscape of dam capacity per capita in 2002 was diverse, with countries displaying significant variation in their water storage capabilities. Out of the 160 countries with available data, the average dam capacity per capita was 1539.18 cubic meters, with a median value of 286.01 cubic meters. The top three nations—Suriname, Canada, and Zambia—boasted impressive capacities of 40,277.8, 26,662.2, and 9,497.92 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. This high capacity reflects their abundant freshwater resources and advanced water management systems, crucial for supporting both domestic needs and economic activities.

Regional Disparities and Environmental Factors

The disparities in dam capacity per capita highlight significant regional differences, often influenced by geographical and environmental factors. Countries like Suriname and Canada benefit from vast natural water reserves and relatively low population densities, enabling them to maintain high per capita capacity. In contrast, nations with 0 cubic meters per inhabitant, such as Rwanda, Papua New Guinea, and Maldives, face challenges due to limited natural water resources, high population density, or lack of infrastructure investment. These disparities emphasize the need for region-specific strategies to improve water security and resource management.

Examining year-over-year changes reveals interesting trends and shifts in dam capacity per capita. While the average change was a decrease of 0.3%, certain countries experienced significant increases. Portugal led with a remarkable 54.6% rise, translating to an additional 394.47 cubic meters per inhabitant. This increase reflects recent investments in water infrastructure aimed at enhancing agricultural productivity and securing water supplies amid growing demand. Mexico and Tunisia also saw substantial increases of 32.5% and 11.8%, respectively, indicating their commitment to improving water management systems.

Challenges and Opportunities in Water Resource Management

Despite advancements in some regions, global challenges in water resource management persist. Countries like Suriname, Zambia, and Canada recorded decreases in dam capacity per capita, underscoring the impact of climate change, aging infrastructure, and growing population pressures. Suriname, for instance, saw a 2.0% reduction, highlighting the need for sustainable management practices and infrastructure upgrades to maintain its high capacity. Conversely, these challenges present opportunities for innovation and international cooperation. By investing in modern technologies and sharing best practices, countries can enhance their water management systems, ensuring long-term sustainability and resilience.

Future Implications for Global Water Security

The data from 2002 underscores the critical role of effective water management in achieving global sustainability goals. As populations grow and climate change intensifies, the demand for reliable water resources will only increase. Countries with higher dam capacities per capita are better positioned to meet these challenges, providing a stable foundation for economic development and community well-being. Moving forward, international collaboration and targeted investments in water infrastructure will be vital in bridging the gap between high-capacity and low-capacity nations, fostering a more equitable and sustainable future for all.

The "Dam capacity per capita" metric in 2002 offers valuable insights into the state of global water resource management during that time. By understanding the factors influencing capacity variations, such as geographical conditions, policy decisions, and technological advancements, stakeholders can develop more effective strategies for ensuring water security and promoting sustainable development worldwide.

Insights by country

1

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone ranked 124th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 2002. The country had a dam capacity of 44.2528 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a limited but existing infrastructure for water storage and management relative to its population size.

This statistic reflects the challenges faced by Sierra Leone in developing its water resources, particularly in the aftermath of a devastating civil war that ended in 2002. The war severely impacted the country's infrastructure, including water supply systems, which hindered investments in dam construction and maintenance.

Factors contributing to the low dam capacity per capita may include historical neglect of infrastructure, economic constraints, and a focus on immediate humanitarian needs over long-term water resource management. Additionally, Sierra Leone's reliance on surface water sources, combined with seasonal variations in rainfall, further complicates the effective management of its water resources.

2

Afghanistan

In 2002, Afghanistan ranked 108th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country had a dam capacity of 93.9746 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting the limited infrastructure and challenges facing water management in the region.

This relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including decades of conflict, underinvestment in infrastructure, and the geographical challenges of managing water resources in a predominantly mountainous terrain. The lack of effective governance and ongoing instability further hindered the development of water storage and distribution systems.

Additionally, Afghanistan's water resource management is complicated by its reliance on snowmelt and seasonal rainfall, which can be unpredictable. As a result, the country faces significant challenges in ensuring water security for its population, particularly in rural areas where access to water infrastructure is often limited.

3

Hungary

In 2002, Hungary ranked 131st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 25.2898 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure for water management, which is crucial for meeting the demands of agriculture, industry, and domestic use.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Hungary can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographical characteristics and historical investments in water infrastructure. The Danube River, which flows through Hungary, provides significant water resources; however, the management and storage of these resources within dams may not have been prioritized historically compared to other European nations.

Moreover, Hungary's focus on preserving its natural landscapes and ecosystems may have limited the construction of new large dams, impacting the per capita capacity. In contrast, countries with higher dam capacities often have a greater emphasis on large-scale water infrastructure projects to support extensive agricultural and industrial needs.

4

Eritrea

Eritrea ranks 134th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita for the year 2002. The dam capacity per capita in Eritrea is recorded at 18.4331 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting the country's limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population size.

This relatively low figure can be attributed to several factors, including the country's ongoing developmental challenges, limited financial resources, and the impacts of prolonged conflict that have hindered investment in essential infrastructure such as dams and water management systems. Additionally, Eritrea's arid climate poses challenges for water conservation and storage.

In comparison to other nations, this statistic highlights the significant water scarcity issues faced by Eritrea, which is crucial for agricultural development and overall public health. Access to adequate water resources remains a critical concern, affecting both economic activities and the quality of life for its citizens.

5

Estonia

In the year 2002, Estonia ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 132.301 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure for water management and storage, which is vital for both agriculture and urban development.

Estonia's dam capacity per capita can be attributed to its geographical features, including numerous rivers and lakes, which provide suitable sites for dam construction. Additionally, the country has invested in water management systems to support both its growing population and agricultural needs, particularly in the context of its transition from a Soviet republic to an independent nation.

Moreover, Estonia's position in the European Union has encouraged investment in infrastructure, including water management projects. The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita also indicates potential areas for improvement in water resource management, reflecting broader trends in environmental sustainability and climate change adaptation across Europe.

6

Gabon

In 2002, Gabon ranked 99th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 163.552 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure, which is crucial given Gabon's relatively low population density and abundant water resources.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Gabon's extensive river systems, such as the Ogooué River, which provides ample opportunities for hydroelectric development. Additionally, the country's government has prioritized energy projects to support its economic growth and reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

Furthermore, Gabon's focus on renewable energy sources is aligned with global trends towards sustainability and environmental conservation. As a rich resource country, Gabon’s ability to harness its water resources effectively can lead to both energy independence and improved living standards for its citizens.

7

Canada

In 2002, Canada achieved a remarkable position, ranking second out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive value of 26,662.2 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects Canada's extensive network of rivers and lakes, as well as its significant investment in hydropower infrastructure.

The substantial dam capacity is primarily driven by Canada’s vast geographical landscape, which includes numerous freshwater resources. The country has a strong emphasis on renewable energy, particularly hydropower, which is a major contributor to its electricity generation, accounting for approximately 60% of the total electricity produced.

Moreover, Canada's commitment to sustainable energy practices and its hydrological capabilities are further enhanced by initiatives to manage water resources effectively. This focus on renewable energy not only supports the domestic energy needs but also positions Canada as a leader in environmental stewardship on the global stage.

8

Finland

In 2002, Finland ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 3577.12 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects Finland's extensive network of lakes and rivers, which has been harnessed for hydroelectric power generation and water management.

The country's significant investment in renewable energy sources, particularly hydropower, has contributed to its ability to maintain such a high dam capacity. With over 1,200 dams constructed across its waterways, Finland effectively utilizes its natural resources to meet energy demands, while also facilitating flood control and irrigation.

Additionally, Finland's commitment to sustainable development and environmental conservation has ensured that its water resources are managed efficiently, allowing for both economic growth and ecological preservation. As part of its national strategy, the country continues to explore innovations in water management and hydropower technology to further enhance its dam capacity and overall energy sustainability.

9

Norway

In 2002, Norway ranked 6th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with an impressive value of 7285.32 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects Norway's extensive investment in hydropower, which is a significant component of its energy landscape.

The country's topography, characterized by numerous rivers and waterfalls, facilitates the construction of dams and hydropower plants, enhancing its ability to generate renewable energy. Moreover, the emphasis on sustainable energy practices has made hydropower a cornerstone of Norway's electricity supply, contributing to its status as one of the world's leading producers of renewable energy.

In addition to its high dam capacity per capita, Norway also benefits from a strong environmental policy framework and significant government support for energy innovation. This focus on renewable energy not only serves domestic needs but also allows Norway to export electricity, further solidifying its role in the global energy market.

10

Maldives

In the year 2002, Maldives ranked 156th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the limited infrastructure for large-scale water storage and management in the country, which is predominantly composed of low-lying islands.

The absence of dam capacity is largely due to the Maldives' geographical characteristics, where the focus has historically been on maintaining natural water bodies and managing freshwater resources rather than constructing large dams. Additionally, the nation's reliance on groundwater and rainwater harvesting for its water supply further diminishes the need for extensive dam infrastructure.

In a broader context, this statistic reflects challenges related to climate change and rising sea levels, which pose significant risks to the Maldives' freshwater resources. The country is also facing increasing pressures from tourism and population growth, which may exacerbate issues related to water scarcity and infrastructure development in the future.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts