Dam capacity per capita 1983
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Australia | 4,566.85 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Côte d'Ivoire | 4,016.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 3,357.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Albania | 1,232.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Bulgaria | 665.195 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Angola | 475.796 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Austria | 255.847 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Afghanistan | 184.008 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Algeria | 114.395 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Antigua and Barbuda | 77.325 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Bangladesh | 67.939 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Canada | 32,770.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Brazil | 3,982.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Cameroon | 1,335.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Chile | 803.664 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Costa Rica | 750.622 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Cuba | 407.221 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Botswana | 291.358 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | China | 270.791 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Colombia | 234.708 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Brunei Darussalam | 219.853 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Dominican Republic | 167.35 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Cyprus | 133.205 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Burkina Faso | 122.189 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Bolivia | 47.878 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 14.684 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Benin | 5.492 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo | 4.615 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.807 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Ghana | 11,397.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Iraq | 9,676.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Iceland | 7,410.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Finland | 3,831.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Egypt | 3,519.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Laos | 1,985.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Kenya | 1,219.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Greece | 1,045.65 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | El Salvador | 743.303 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Lesotho | 567.249 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Iran | 367.826 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Eswatini | 342.807 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Gabon | 271.268 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Guyana | 257.961 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Ireland | 248.456 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | India | 228.341 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Fiji | 192.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Italy | 152.154 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Japan | 114.171 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Liberia | 113.236 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Indonesia | 74.852 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Lebanon | 71.083 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Guatemala | 62.148 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Haiti | 49.907 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Germany | 39.56 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Ecuador | 36.842 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | France | 168.849 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Guinea | 44.218 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Hungary | 24.136 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Honduras | 6.177 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Denmark | 3.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Grenada | 0.19 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Jordan | 2.601 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Jamaica | 2.439 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 104.301 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 9,056.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Mozambique | 6,003.28 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Norway | 5,672.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | New Zealand | 5,102.54 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Panama | 4,062 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Paraguay | 2,570.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Mexico | 1,303.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | North Korea | 936.619 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Portugal | 655.661 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Namibia | 632.687 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Malaysia | 544.116 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Morocco | 494.366 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Nigeria | 453.971 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Netherlands | 448.291 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Romania | 383.504 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Pakistan | 300.037 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Mali | 291.87 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Luxembourg | 148.574 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Mongolia | 136.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Mauritius | 63.136 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Madagascar | 50.133 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Malawi | 5.921 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Peru | 214.706 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Philippines | 98.976 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Myanmar | 68.572 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Poland | 54.818 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Niger | 12.427 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Nepal | 5.111 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Saint Lucia | 20.793 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | 373.635 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 64.529 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 52,805.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 15,849.1 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 12,184.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uruguay | 5,715.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Uganda | 5,625.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Tanzania | 4,942.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sweden | 4,244.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 3,027.67 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,289.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Thailand | 1,258.87 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Spain | 1,069.74 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Turkey | 1,007.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Venezuela | 723.077 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Switzerland | 520.85 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Vietnam | 467.853 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Sri Lanka | 273.177 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 91.914 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 63.189 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 27.886 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 679.646 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Tunisia | 242.726 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | South Korea | 213.219 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 61.584 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 2.317 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | 12.922 cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.493 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Australia
- #2
Côte d'Ivoire
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Albania
- #5
Bulgaria
- #6
Angola
- #7
Austria
- #8
Afghanistan
- #9
Algeria
- #10
Antigua and Barbuda
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tajikistan
- #156
Sudan
- #155
State of Palestine
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1983, the metric of "Dam capacity per capita" offered a fascinating glimpse into global water resource management. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, is pivotal for understanding a nation’s ability to provide water security for its citizens. It plays a crucial role in supporting agriculture, industry, and community livelihoods. The information sheds light on the sustainability of water resources and highlights disparities across different regions of the world.
Global Distribution of Dam Capacity per Capita
The year 1983 exhibited significant variation in dam capacity per capita across the globe. Suriname led the rankings with a staggering 52,805.8 cubic meters per inhabitant, illustrating a robust capacity to manage water resources relative to its population size. This was followed by Canada with 32,770.7 cubic meters per capita, reflecting its vast natural water reserves and extensive infrastructure. On the opposite end of the spectrum, several countries, including Belize, Bhutan, and Rwanda, recorded a dam capacity of zero, highlighting a stark contrast in water resource management capabilities. These discrepancies underscore the differences in geographic and infrastructural development that influence water availability.
Regional Trends and Patterns
A closer examination of regional trends reveals that countries with larger landmasses and significant natural water resources tend to have higher capacities. In Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe showcased notable capacities of 15,849.1 and 12,184.7 cubic meters per capita, respectively. These figures indicate efforts in harnessing rivers and other water bodies for management purposes. Contrastingly, many smaller nations, particularly in regions like the Caribbean and parts of Asia, had minimal capacities, pointing to either limited natural resources or underdeveloped water management infrastructure.
Changes in Capacity and Influencing Factors
The year 1983 also saw some dynamic changes in dam capacity per capita compared to previous years. Cameroon experienced the most significant increase with an addition of 836.29 cubic meters per capita, marking a 167.6% rise. This surge reflects increased investment in water infrastructure and a possible governmental focus on enhancing water security. Iraq also saw a substantial increase of 575.87 cubic meters per capita, as the country invested in large-scale water projects during this period. On the other hand, countries like Zambia and Zimbabwe experienced decreases in their capacities by 519.10 and 469.30 cubic meters per capita, respectively. These declines could be attributed to infrastructural limitations or environmental factors such as droughts.
Sustainability and Development Implications
Understanding dam capacity per capita is vital for assessing a country's sustainable development trajectory. Nations with higher capacities are generally better positioned to support agricultural productivity, industrial activities, and urban water needs. For instance, Canada and Suriname's significant capacities could facilitate better management of water resources during dry periods, reducing vulnerability to climate variability. Conversely, countries with minimal capacities, like Yemen and the Democratic Republic of Congo, face challenges in meeting the water demands of their growing populations, which could impede economic and social development.
Policy Directions and Future Outlook
The variances in dam capacity per capita observed in 1983 suggest critical areas for policy intervention. Countries with low capacities must prioritize investments in water infrastructure to improve resource management and ensure equitable access. International cooperation and assistance could play a key role in supporting these efforts, particularly in regions struggling with water scarcity. As climate change continues to impact global water systems, enhancing dam capacities could provide a buffer against adverse weather conditions, safeguarding water supply for future generations.
Insights by country
Nepal
Nepal ranked 113th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1983. The dam capacity per capita for the country was measured at 5.11111 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a limited infrastructure for water storage and management relative to its population size.
This statistic reflects the challenges faced by Nepal in harnessing its considerable hydropower potential, influenced by its rugged terrain and underdeveloped infrastructure. Factors such as political instability, economic constraints, and limited technical expertise have historically hindered the development of large-scale dam projects.
In comparison, Nepal's hydropower potential is estimated to exceed 83,000 megawatts, highlighting a significant gap between potential and actual utilization. The limited dam capacity per capita underscores the need for investment in water resource management to support agricultural activities and energy generation in the country.
Cuba
Cuba ranked 52nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1983, with a capacity of 407.221 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's significant investment in hydropower and water management infrastructure, which is essential for supporting its agricultural and urban needs.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Cuba's geographical features, including numerous rivers and mountainous regions suitable for dam construction. Additionally, the government's focus on sustainable energy sources during this period aimed to reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels, which further emphasized the development of water resources.
Interestingly, Cuba's commitment to environmental conservation and water resource management has historically contributed to its resilience against natural disasters, notably hurricanes. This focus on infrastructure development and sustainability has positioned Cuba as a noteworthy example in the Caribbean region regarding water management practices.
Ghana
In 1983, Ghana achieved a remarkable dam capacity per capita of 11,397.3 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking the country fifth out of 164 nations. This impressive statistic reflects Ghana's significant investment in water infrastructure during a period when many countries were struggling with basic water supply challenges.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's topography, which is conducive to dam construction, and the government's emphasis on harnessing water resources for agricultural irrigation and hydroelectric power generation. Such infrastructure not only supports local agriculture but also contributes to national energy needs.
Additionally, Ghana's strategic location along significant river systems, such as the Volta River, provides ample opportunities for the development of large-scale dams. The Akosombo Dam, completed in the early 1960s, is a notable example that has played a crucial role in supplying electricity and regulating water flow in the region.
Zimbabwe
In 1983, Zimbabwe achieved a remarkable dam capacity per capita of 12,184.7 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 4th out of 164 countries globally. This significant statistic highlights the country's extensive investment in water infrastructure, which was crucial for both agricultural and domestic use during this period.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Zimbabwe's geographical features, including numerous rivers and favorable climatic conditions, which facilitate the construction of large water reservoirs. Additionally, policies prioritizing irrigation and water management in the post-independence era (1980) played a vital role in enhancing water storage capabilities.
Interestingly, this level of dam capacity reflects Zimbabwe's strategic focus on water resource management, which is essential for supporting its predominantly agrarian economy. The emphasis on irrigation has historically contributed to agricultural productivity, thereby influencing food security and economic stability in the region.
Benin
In 1983, Benin ranked 112th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 5.49197 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population, indicating challenges in water resource management.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Benin can be attributed to several factors, including underinvestment in infrastructure, geographic limitations, and a focus on other pressing development needs. Additionally, the country's historical political and economic instability may have hindered substantial investments in water management systems.
It is also important to note that as of 1983, Benin was undergoing significant changes due to its transition from a Marxist-Leninist regime to a more democratic governance structure, which may have diverted resources from infrastructure development. Overall, effective water management remains a critical issue for Benin, with implications for agriculture, health, and economic development.
Afghanistan
In 1983, Afghanistan ranked 73rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 184.008 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s water management capabilities and the infrastructure established for irrigation and hydroelectric power generation during that period.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Afghanistan's mountainous terrain, which is conducive to the construction of dams and reservoirs. Additionally, the country's reliance on agriculture necessitated effective water management strategies to support irrigation in its predominantly arid regions.
Despite this capacity, Afghanistan faced significant challenges regarding water resource management, largely due to ongoing geopolitical conflicts, which hindered infrastructure development and maintenance. The situation underscores the critical importance of stable governance and investment in water infrastructure for sustainable development.
Malta
In 1983, Malta ranked 143rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with the recorded value being null cubic meters per inhabitant. This low figure underscores the significant challenges Malta faces regarding water resource management, particularly given its geographical and climatic conditions.
The absence of substantial dam capacity reflects Malta's limited freshwater resources and reliance on desalination and groundwater extraction. The island's small land area and high population density contribute to the pressure on its water supply, exacerbating the challenges of managing water resources effectively.
Furthermore, Malta's Mediterranean climate, characterized by hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters, influences its water availability. This climate necessitates innovative water management strategies to ensure sustainability, especially in light of increasing demands from tourism and agriculture.
Slovakia
In 1983, Slovakia ranked 156th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, indicating a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population. The actual value recorded for dam capacity per capita during this period was null cubic meters per inhabitant, suggesting that there was minimal or no significant dam capacity available for individual inhabitants at that time.
This low capacity can be attributed to several factors, including the historical context of Slovakia as part of Czechoslovakia, which may have prioritized other forms of infrastructure development over water management. Additionally, the economic constraints and political landscape of the era likely limited investment in large-scale dam projects.
Water resource management has evolved since then, and Slovakia has since developed various water management strategies, highlighting the importance of sustainable practices in response to the changing climate and regional water demands. Today, Slovakia continues to enhance its water infrastructure to support both agricultural and urban needs.
Hungary
In 1983, Hungary ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 24.1363 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for agricultural irrigation, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation.
The relatively low ranking suggests that while Hungary has developed a network of dams, it may not have as extensive a capacity per capita compared to other countries, potentially due to geographical limitations and historical development patterns. Factors such as urbanization and industrialization during the mid-20th century may have influenced the allocation of resources towards infrastructure projects, impacting the overall dam capacity.
Additionally, Hungary's emphasis on environmental management and sustainable use of water resources has led to initiatives aimed at improving water infrastructure, which may have evolved since 1983. As a landlocked country, managing water resources effectively is vital for Hungary's economic activities, including agriculture, which remains a significant sector in the national economy.
Congo
In 1983, Congo ranked 114th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 4.61462 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure development and water management capabilities during that period.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including limited financial resources, political instability, and underinvestment in necessary infrastructure. Additionally, the country's reliance on natural water bodies for irrigation and hydroelectric power may have influenced the development of large-scale dam projects.
As a point of reference, many countries with higher dam capacities often benefit from advanced engineering practices, significant government investment, and stable political environments, which allow for the construction and maintenance of large water management systems. In contrast, Congo's challenges in these areas have historically hindered its ability to enhance its dam capacity.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data