Dam capacity per capita 1983

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
4,566.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
4,016.49 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,357.03 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Albania flag
Albania
1,232.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
665.195 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Angola flag
Angola
475.796 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Austria flag
Austria
255.847 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
184.008 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Algeria flag
Algeria
114.395 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
77.325 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
67.939 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
32,770.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,982.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,335.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Chile flag
Chile
803.664 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
750.622 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Cuba flag
Cuba
407.221 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Botswana flag
Botswana
291.358 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
China flag
China
270.791 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
234.708 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
219.853 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
167.35 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
133.205 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
122.189 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
47.878 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.684 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Benin flag
Benin
5.492 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo flag
Congo
4.615 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.807 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Ghana flag
Ghana
11,397.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Iraq flag
Iraq
9,676.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Iceland flag
Iceland
7,410.83 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Finland flag
Finland
3,831.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Egypt flag
Egypt
3,519.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Laos flag
Laos
1,985.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,219.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Greece flag
Greece
1,045.65 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
743.303 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
567.249 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Iran flag
Iran
367.826 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
342.807 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Gabon flag
Gabon
271.268 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Guyana flag
Guyana
257.961 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Ireland flag
Ireland
248.456 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
India flag
India
228.341 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Fiji flag
Fiji
192.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Italy flag
Italy
152.154 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Japan flag
Japan
114.171 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Liberia flag
Liberia
113.236 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
74.852 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
71.083 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
62.148 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Haiti flag
Haiti
49.907 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Germany flag
Germany
39.56 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
36.842 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
70
France flag
France
168.849 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Guinea flag
Guinea
44.218 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.136 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Honduras flag
Honduras
6.177 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Jordan flag
Jordan
2.601 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.439 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
104.301 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
9,056.06 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
6,003.28 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Norway flag
Norway
5,672.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
5,102.54 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Panama flag
Panama
4,062 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
2,570.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,303.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
North Korea flag
North Korea
936.619 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Portugal flag
Portugal
655.661 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Namibia flag
Namibia
632.687 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
544.116 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Morocco flag
Morocco
494.366 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
453.971 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
448.291 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Romania flag
Romania
383.504 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
300.037 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mali flag
Mali
291.87 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
148.574 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
136.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
63.136 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
50.133 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Malawi flag
Malawi
5.921 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Peru flag
Peru
214.706 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Philippines flag
Philippines
98.976 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
68.572 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Poland flag
Poland
54.818 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Niger flag
Niger
12.427 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Nepal flag
Nepal
5.111 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
20.793 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
373.635 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
64.529 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
52,805.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
15,849.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
12,184.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,715.94 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Uganda flag
Uganda
5,625.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
4,942.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,244.73 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
3,027.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,289.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,258.87 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Spain flag
Spain
1,069.74 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,007.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
723.077 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
520.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
467.853 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
273.177 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
91.914 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
63.189 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
27.886 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
679.646 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
242.726 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
South Korea flag
South Korea
213.219 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
61.584 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
2.317 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
12.922 cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.493 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Albania flagAlbania
  5. #5Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  6. #6Angola flagAngola
  7. #7Austria flagAustria
  8. #8Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  9. #9Algeria flagAlgeria
  10. #10Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  9. #156Sudan flagSudan
  10. #155State of Palestine flagState of Palestine

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1983, the metric of "Dam capacity per capita" offered a fascinating glimpse into global water resource management. This measure, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, is pivotal for understanding a nation’s ability to provide water security for its citizens. It plays a crucial role in supporting agriculture, industry, and community livelihoods. The information sheds light on the sustainability of water resources and highlights disparities across different regions of the world.

Global Distribution of Dam Capacity per Capita

The year 1983 exhibited significant variation in dam capacity per capita across the globe. Suriname led the rankings with a staggering 52,805.8 cubic meters per inhabitant, illustrating a robust capacity to manage water resources relative to its population size. This was followed by Canada with 32,770.7 cubic meters per capita, reflecting its vast natural water reserves and extensive infrastructure. On the opposite end of the spectrum, several countries, including Belize, Bhutan, and Rwanda, recorded a dam capacity of zero, highlighting a stark contrast in water resource management capabilities. These discrepancies underscore the differences in geographic and infrastructural development that influence water availability.

A closer examination of regional trends reveals that countries with larger landmasses and significant natural water resources tend to have higher capacities. In Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe showcased notable capacities of 15,849.1 and 12,184.7 cubic meters per capita, respectively. These figures indicate efforts in harnessing rivers and other water bodies for management purposes. Contrastingly, many smaller nations, particularly in regions like the Caribbean and parts of Asia, had minimal capacities, pointing to either limited natural resources or underdeveloped water management infrastructure.

Changes in Capacity and Influencing Factors

The year 1983 also saw some dynamic changes in dam capacity per capita compared to previous years. Cameroon experienced the most significant increase with an addition of 836.29 cubic meters per capita, marking a 167.6% rise. This surge reflects increased investment in water infrastructure and a possible governmental focus on enhancing water security. Iraq also saw a substantial increase of 575.87 cubic meters per capita, as the country invested in large-scale water projects during this period. On the other hand, countries like Zambia and Zimbabwe experienced decreases in their capacities by 519.10 and 469.30 cubic meters per capita, respectively. These declines could be attributed to infrastructural limitations or environmental factors such as droughts.

Sustainability and Development Implications

Understanding dam capacity per capita is vital for assessing a country's sustainable development trajectory. Nations with higher capacities are generally better positioned to support agricultural productivity, industrial activities, and urban water needs. For instance, Canada and Suriname's significant capacities could facilitate better management of water resources during dry periods, reducing vulnerability to climate variability. Conversely, countries with minimal capacities, like Yemen and the Democratic Republic of Congo, face challenges in meeting the water demands of their growing populations, which could impede economic and social development.

Policy Directions and Future Outlook

The variances in dam capacity per capita observed in 1983 suggest critical areas for policy intervention. Countries with low capacities must prioritize investments in water infrastructure to improve resource management and ensure equitable access. International cooperation and assistance could play a key role in supporting these efforts, particularly in regions struggling with water scarcity. As climate change continues to impact global water systems, enhancing dam capacities could provide a buffer against adverse weather conditions, safeguarding water supply for future generations.

Insights by country

1

Nepal

Nepal ranked 113th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1983. The dam capacity per capita for the country was measured at 5.11111 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a limited infrastructure for water storage and management relative to its population size.

This statistic reflects the challenges faced by Nepal in harnessing its considerable hydropower potential, influenced by its rugged terrain and underdeveloped infrastructure. Factors such as political instability, economic constraints, and limited technical expertise have historically hindered the development of large-scale dam projects.

In comparison, Nepal's hydropower potential is estimated to exceed 83,000 megawatts, highlighting a significant gap between potential and actual utilization. The limited dam capacity per capita underscores the need for investment in water resource management to support agricultural activities and energy generation in the country.

2

Cuba

Cuba ranked 52nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1983, with a capacity of 407.221 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's significant investment in hydropower and water management infrastructure, which is essential for supporting its agricultural and urban needs.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Cuba's geographical features, including numerous rivers and mountainous regions suitable for dam construction. Additionally, the government's focus on sustainable energy sources during this period aimed to reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels, which further emphasized the development of water resources.

Interestingly, Cuba's commitment to environmental conservation and water resource management has historically contributed to its resilience against natural disasters, notably hurricanes. This focus on infrastructure development and sustainability has positioned Cuba as a noteworthy example in the Caribbean region regarding water management practices.

3

Ghana

In 1983, Ghana achieved a remarkable dam capacity per capita of 11,397.3 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking the country fifth out of 164 nations. This impressive statistic reflects Ghana's significant investment in water infrastructure during a period when many countries were struggling with basic water supply challenges.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the country's topography, which is conducive to dam construction, and the government's emphasis on harnessing water resources for agricultural irrigation and hydroelectric power generation. Such infrastructure not only supports local agriculture but also contributes to national energy needs.

Additionally, Ghana's strategic location along significant river systems, such as the Volta River, provides ample opportunities for the development of large-scale dams. The Akosombo Dam, completed in the early 1960s, is a notable example that has played a crucial role in supplying electricity and regulating water flow in the region.

4

Zimbabwe

In 1983, Zimbabwe achieved a remarkable dam capacity per capita of 12,184.7 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 4th out of 164 countries globally. This significant statistic highlights the country's extensive investment in water infrastructure, which was crucial for both agricultural and domestic use during this period.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Zimbabwe's geographical features, including numerous rivers and favorable climatic conditions, which facilitate the construction of large water reservoirs. Additionally, policies prioritizing irrigation and water management in the post-independence era (1980) played a vital role in enhancing water storage capabilities.

Interestingly, this level of dam capacity reflects Zimbabwe's strategic focus on water resource management, which is essential for supporting its predominantly agrarian economy. The emphasis on irrigation has historically contributed to agricultural productivity, thereby influencing food security and economic stability in the region.

5

Benin

In 1983, Benin ranked 112th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 5.49197 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited water storage infrastructure relative to its population, indicating challenges in water resource management.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita in Benin can be attributed to several factors, including underinvestment in infrastructure, geographic limitations, and a focus on other pressing development needs. Additionally, the country's historical political and economic instability may have hindered substantial investments in water management systems.

It is also important to note that as of 1983, Benin was undergoing significant changes due to its transition from a Marxist-Leninist regime to a more democratic governance structure, which may have diverted resources from infrastructure development. Overall, effective water management remains a critical issue for Benin, with implications for agriculture, health, and economic development.

6

Afghanistan

In 1983, Afghanistan ranked 73rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 184.008 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s water management capabilities and the infrastructure established for irrigation and hydroelectric power generation during that period.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Afghanistan's mountainous terrain, which is conducive to the construction of dams and reservoirs. Additionally, the country's reliance on agriculture necessitated effective water management strategies to support irrigation in its predominantly arid regions.

Despite this capacity, Afghanistan faced significant challenges regarding water resource management, largely due to ongoing geopolitical conflicts, which hindered infrastructure development and maintenance. The situation underscores the critical importance of stable governance and investment in water infrastructure for sustainable development.

7

Malta

In 1983, Malta ranked 143rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with the recorded value being null cubic meters per inhabitant. This low figure underscores the significant challenges Malta faces regarding water resource management, particularly given its geographical and climatic conditions.

The absence of substantial dam capacity reflects Malta's limited freshwater resources and reliance on desalination and groundwater extraction. The island's small land area and high population density contribute to the pressure on its water supply, exacerbating the challenges of managing water resources effectively.

Furthermore, Malta's Mediterranean climate, characterized by hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters, influences its water availability. This climate necessitates innovative water management strategies to ensure sustainability, especially in light of increasing demands from tourism and agriculture.

8

Slovakia

In 1983, Slovakia ranked 156th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, indicating a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population. The actual value recorded for dam capacity per capita during this period was null cubic meters per inhabitant, suggesting that there was minimal or no significant dam capacity available for individual inhabitants at that time.

This low capacity can be attributed to several factors, including the historical context of Slovakia as part of Czechoslovakia, which may have prioritized other forms of infrastructure development over water management. Additionally, the economic constraints and political landscape of the era likely limited investment in large-scale dam projects.

Water resource management has evolved since then, and Slovakia has since developed various water management strategies, highlighting the importance of sustainable practices in response to the changing climate and regional water demands. Today, Slovakia continues to enhance its water infrastructure to support both agricultural and urban needs.

9

Hungary

In 1983, Hungary ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 24.1363 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for agricultural irrigation, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation.

The relatively low ranking suggests that while Hungary has developed a network of dams, it may not have as extensive a capacity per capita compared to other countries, potentially due to geographical limitations and historical development patterns. Factors such as urbanization and industrialization during the mid-20th century may have influenced the allocation of resources towards infrastructure projects, impacting the overall dam capacity.

Additionally, Hungary's emphasis on environmental management and sustainable use of water resources has led to initiatives aimed at improving water infrastructure, which may have evolved since 1983. As a landlocked country, managing water resources effectively is vital for Hungary's economic activities, including agriculture, which remains a significant sector in the national economy.

10

Congo

In 1983, Congo ranked 114th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 4.61462 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure development and water management capabilities during that period.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including limited financial resources, political instability, and underinvestment in necessary infrastructure. Additionally, the country's reliance on natural water bodies for irrigation and hydroelectric power may have influenced the development of large-scale dam projects.

As a point of reference, many countries with higher dam capacities often benefit from advanced engineering practices, significant government investment, and stable political environments, which allow for the construction and maintenance of large water management systems. In contrast, Congo's challenges in these areas have historically hindered its ability to enhance its dam capacity.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts