Dam capacity per capita 1997

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Canada flag
Canada
27,951.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Iceland flag
Iceland
8,503.79 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Ghana flag
Ghana
8,142.15 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Norway flag
Norway
7,472.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
6,654.53 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Russia flag
Russia
5,421.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
4,803.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
4,471.25 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
4,373.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Panama flag
Panama
3,069.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Mali flag
Mali
1,278.82 cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,187.25 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
1,044.56 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
809.525 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
North Korea flag
North Korea
772.208 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Portugal flag
Portugal
728.783 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
587.269 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Morocco flag
Morocco
566.634 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Romania flag
Romania
493.603 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
433.923 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Namibia flag
Namibia
419.433 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
258.866 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Peru flag
Peru
226.976 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
207.357 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
194.656 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
143.253 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
138.579 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
104.641 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
87.034 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Libya flag
Libya
76.983 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Philippines flag
Philippines
73.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Poland flag
Poland
71.969 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
56.886 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Oman flag
Oman
34.409 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
32.918 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
17.042 cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Niger flag
Niger
8.029 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Malawi flag
Malawi
3.953 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Nepal flag
Nepal
3.674 cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Maldives flag
Maldives
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Malta flag
Malta
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Suriname flag
Suriname
44,636.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Zambia flag
Zambia
10,948.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
8,785.53 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Iraq flag
Iraq
6,845.06 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
6,638.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,321.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
4,983.21 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
4,847.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
4,718.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Australia flag
Australia
4,203.55 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,065.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Uganda flag
Uganda
3,660.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,636.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Finland flag
Finland
3,619.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,609.64 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
3,299.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
2,694.53 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
United States flag
United States
2,686.28 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Egypt flag
Egypt
2,457.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Turkey flag
Turkey
2,343.56 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
2,320.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
1,418.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Laos flag
Laos
1,372.28 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Spain flag
Spain
1,296.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,279.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Albania flag
Albania
1,247.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
1,145.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,133.24 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Greece flag
Greece
1,115.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,061.54 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Honduras flag
Honduras
956.056 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
929.374 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
905.423 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
895.358 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Kenya flag
Kenya
881.103 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
793.272 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Chile flag
Chile
789.653 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Georgia flag
Georgia
727.08 cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
724.797 cubic meters per inhabitant
82
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
663.692 cubic meters per inhabitant
83
South Africa flag
South Africa
650.828 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
633.299 cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
555.134 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
527.775 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
471.635 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Cuba flag
Cuba
457.553 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
455.629 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Armenia flag
Armenia
427.229 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Latvia flag
Latvia
413.031 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
China flag
China
385.154 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Togo flag
Togo
363.483 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
South Korea flag
South Korea
352.622 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
325.621 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
318.225 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
309.755 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Angola flag
Angola
304.917 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
304.83 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Iran flag
Iran
297.952 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Botswana flag
Botswana
288.673 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
280.733 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Austria flag
Austria
266.97 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
251.322 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Colombia flag
Colombia
237.874 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Ireland flag
Ireland
236.637 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Japan flag
Japan
235.196 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
231.734 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
219.626 cubic meters per inhabitant
110
India flag
India
214.488 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Croatia flag
Croatia
213.558 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Gabon flag
Gabon
186.214 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
France flag
France
170.178 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Fiji flag
Fiji
163.765 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Italy flag
Italy
162.611 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Algeria flag
Algeria
159.664 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
147.419 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Belarus flag
Belarus
131.945 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Estonia flag
Estonia
128.386 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
108.877 cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
108.144 cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Liberia flag
Liberia
98.882 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
91.278 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
56.323 cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
54.731 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
51.72 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
43.017 cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Senegal flag
Senegal
26.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
90.193 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
70.666 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
68.369 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
53.549 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
50.921 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
42.475 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Germany flag
Germany
40.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Haiti flag
Haiti
37.814 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Guinea flag
Guinea
29.881 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.945 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Yemen flag
Yemen
22.902 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Jordan flag
Jordan
21.818 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
20.496 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Singapore flag
Singapore
19.728 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
16.882 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
16.385 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.157 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
12.555 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Belize flag
Belize
7.818 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.784 cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Benin flag
Benin
3.57 cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Congo flag
Congo
3.116 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.139 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.149 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.209 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0.086 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
162
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Canada flagCanada
  2. #2Iceland flagIceland
  3. #3Ghana flagGhana
  4. #4Norway flagNorway
  5. #5Nicaragua flagNicaragua
  6. #6Russia flagRussia
  7. #7Paraguay flagParaguay
  8. #8New Zealand flagNew Zealand
  9. #9Mozambique flagMozambique
  10. #10Panama flagPanama

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Sudan flagSudan
  2. #163State of Palestine flagState of Palestine
  3. #162Somalia flagSomalia
  4. #161Rwanda flagRwanda
  5. #160Papua New Guinea flagPapua New Guinea
  6. #159Guinea-Bissau flagGuinea-Bissau
  7. #158Cabo Verde flagCabo Verde
  8. #157Bhutan flagBhutan
  9. #156Bahrain flagBahrain
  10. #155Cambodia flagCambodia

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

The concept of dam capacity per capita is a critical measure in understanding how countries manage their water resources, especially in the year 1997. This metric, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, provides insight into a nation's ability to store water for various uses, including agriculture, industry, and household consumption. As water security increasingly becomes a global concern, analyzing dam capacity per capita offers a valuable lens through which to assess a country's potential for sustainable development.

Global Overview of Dam Capacity in 1997

In 1997, the global landscape of dam capacity per capita revealed significant disparities among countries, highlighting the uneven distribution of water resources worldwide. Among the 160 countries with available data, Suriname topped the list with an astonishing 44,636.2 cubic meters per inhabitant, far surpassing the global average of 1,621.14 cubic meters. This remarkable figure underscores Suriname's abundant water resources relative to its population size. In contrast, several countries, including Malta, Bhutan, and Bahrain, recorded a dam capacity per capita of zero, indicating either a lack of significant dam infrastructure or a reliance on alternative water management strategies.

Regional Dynamics and Geographic Patterns

The distribution of dam capacity per capita in 1997 reflects distinct geographic patterns that are closely linked to regional climates and topographies. For instance, Canada's substantial figure of 27,951.6 cubic meters per inhabitant can be attributed to its vast freshwater systems and relatively low population density. Similarly, Norway's high capacity of 7,472.42 cubic meters is indicative of its extensive hydroelectric infrastructure and mountainous terrain. In contrast, many nations in arid or semi-arid regions, such as Bahrain and Malta, struggle with limited water resources, resulting in their minimal dam capacities.

Economic and Sustainability Implications

The disparities in dam capacity per capita also have profound implications for economic development and sustainability. Countries with higher capacities, like Zimbabwe (8,785.53 cubic meters) and Zambia (10,948.7 cubic meters), are better positioned to support agricultural activities and sustain industrial growth. These nations can leverage their water resources to boost food security and economic resilience. On the other hand, countries with minimal or no capacity, such as Rwanda and Bhutan, face significant challenges in securing water for essential uses, potentially hindering their development and prompting the need for innovative water management solutions.

Examining year-over-year changes in dam capacity per capita provides additional context to the 1997 data. While the average global capacity experienced a slight decrease of 0.4%, certain countries demonstrated notable increases, reflecting targeted efforts to enhance water storage capabilities. Lesotho, for instance, saw a remarkable 221.5% increase, raising its capacity by 977.34 cubic meters per inhabitant. This surge indicates significant investment in dam infrastructure, likely driven by a need to improve water security. Conversely, Suriname experienced the largest decrease, with a decline of 939.50 cubic meters, highlighting the variable nature of water resource management and external factors such as climate variability.

Policy and International Cooperation

The variations in dam capacity per capita are not solely a result of geographic and economic factors; they are also influenced by national policies and international cooperation. Countries like Turkey, which reported a modest increase of 82.10 cubic meters (3.6%), demonstrate the impact of strategic policy decisions aimed at enhancing water infrastructure. International collaboration, particularly in regions facing water scarcity, becomes crucial in developing shared water management frameworks and ensuring equitable access to water resources. Such cooperative efforts can lead to improved dam capacities and overall water security, fostering regional stability and development.

In conclusion, the 1997 analysis of dam capacity per capita reveals a complex interplay of geographic, economic, and policy factors shaping global water resource management. Understanding these dynamics is essential for crafting effective strategies to address the growing challenges of water scarcity and ensure sustainable development across nations. As we continue to navigate the intricacies of water management, insights from historical data like these remain invaluable in guiding future actions and policies.

Insights by country

1

Cameroon

In 1997, Cameroon was ranked 40th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a capacity of 1133.24 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in hydropower infrastructure, which is essential for its economic development and energy needs.

The substantial dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Cameroon’s diverse topography and abundant water resources, including the Sanaga River, which is the largest river in the country. Hydropower generation plays a crucial role in meeting the energy demands of both urban and rural populations, helping to drive industrial growth and improve overall living standards.

Additionally, this ranking highlights the importance of water resource management and infrastructure development in Cameroon, which is vital for agricultural irrigation, domestic use, and industrial activities. The country continues to seek ways to enhance its water management systems to support sustainable growth and address challenges related to climate variability.

2

United Arab Emirates

In 1997, the United Arab Emirates ranked 138th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 16.3846 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low dam capacity per capita reflects the country's unique geographic and climatic conditions, characterized by arid desert landscapes and limited freshwater resources.

The United Arab Emirates relies heavily on desalination and water management strategies to meet the demands of its growing population and economic development. Factors contributing to the low dam capacity include the country's emphasis on technological solutions for water supply, which often prioritize desalination over traditional freshwater storage methods.

Additionally, the UAE's rapid urbanization and population growth during this period placed significant pressure on water resources, necessitating innovative approaches to water management rather than extensive dam construction. Interestingly, the reliance on desalination has made the UAE one of the global leaders in this technology, further influencing its overall water strategy.

3

Argentina

In 1997, Argentina ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3636.33 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high per capita dam capacity reflects the country's extensive investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for supporting its agriculture-based economy and managing water resources effectively.

Several factors contribute to this substantial dam capacity, including Argentina's diverse geography, which features numerous rivers and lakes, and its commitment to harnessing water resources for both irrigation and hydroelectric power generation. This capacity is particularly important in regions prone to drought, as it allows for better water storage and distribution.

Additionally, Argentina's focus on renewable energy sources has led to increased development of hydroelectric facilities, further enhancing its dam capacity. The country's rich water resources enable not only agricultural sustainability but also contribute to its energy needs, showcasing the interlinkage between natural resources and economic development.

4

Sierra Leone

In 1997, Sierra Leone ranked 121st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 51.7195 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the relatively limited infrastructure for water storage and management in the country, which has historically faced challenges in developing its water resources.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the impact of the civil war that severely disrupted infrastructure development and maintenance. Additionally, Sierra Leone's geography, characterized by a tropical climate and seasonal rainfall, poses challenges for effective water management and storage.

Water resource management is critical in Sierra Leone, as it affects agriculture, drinking water supply, and economic development. Despite the challenges, the country has made efforts to improve its water infrastructure, which is essential for enhancing the quality of life for its citizens and promoting sustainable development.

5

Afghanistan

In 1997, Afghanistan ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 108.877 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the limited water resource management and infrastructure development within the country during a tumultuous period marked by conflict and instability.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the ongoing civil war, which severely hampered investment in infrastructure and development projects. Additionally, Afghanistan's geographic landscape, characterized by mountainous terrain, complicates the construction and maintenance of dams.

Moreover, the reliance on traditional irrigation systems and the challenges of climate variability have further impacted water resource management in the region. Understanding dam capacity and its implications is crucial, as it relates not only to water supply for agriculture and domestic use but also to broader issues of food security and economic development in Afghanistan.

6

Benin

In 1997, Benin ranked 146 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 3.5696 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited water storage facilities relative to its population, indicating challenges in water resource management and infrastructure development.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited investment in water infrastructure, economic constraints, and a focus on agricultural practices that may not prioritize sustainable water management. Furthermore, Benin's geographical and climatic conditions, characterized by seasonal rainfall patterns, also impact the availability and storage of freshwater resources.

Interestingly, this statistic places Benin in a context where many surrounding nations face similar challenges, highlighting the need for regional cooperation and investment in water infrastructure to improve overall capacity and ensure sustainable water supply for the population.

7

Pakistan

In 1997, Pakistan ranked 94th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 194.656 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management and its ability to provide adequate water supply to its growing population.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited investment in water infrastructure, challenges in the management of existing water resources, and a rapidly increasing population that places additional stress on available water supplies. Moreover, Pakistan faces significant challenges related to seasonal monsoons, which can lead to both flooding and drought conditions, complicating water storage and distribution efforts.

It is noteworthy that Pakistan's water resource management is critical not only for domestic consumption but also for agriculture, which is a major component of the country's economy. Enhanced dam capacity and better water management practices could potentially improve agricultural productivity and food security in the region.

8

Somalia

In 1997, Somalia ranked 162 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This stark statistic indicates a severe lack of infrastructure for water storage and management, which is critical for a country that faces significant challenges in terms of water scarcity.

The absence of dam capacity is largely attributed to ongoing civil conflict, which has hindered governmental stability and investment in essential infrastructure. Additionally, Somalia's geographical characteristics, including its arid climate and reliance on seasonal rainfall, exacerbate the vulnerabilities in water resource management.

Furthermore, historical factors such as prolonged periods of drought and inadequate development policies have contributed to the country's inability to construct and maintain effective water storage systems. This situation has serious implications for agriculture, health, and overall economic development in Somalia.

9

Paraguay

In 1997, Paraguay ranked 15th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a remarkable capacity of 4803.3 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the country's significant investment in hydroelectric projects, particularly the Itaipu Dam, which is one of the largest hydroelectric dams in the world.

The substantial dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Paraguay's abundant water resources, including the Paraguay and Paraná Rivers, which provide a steady supply of water for hydroelectric power generation. Furthermore, the country's reliance on hydropower for electricity—over 99% of its energy needs—is a critical factor that enhances its dam capacity metrics.

Interestingly, Paraguay's position as a leading country in dam capacity reflects not only its natural resources but also its strategic emphasis on renewable energy. This focus on hydropower has allowed Paraguay to export electricity to neighboring countries, significantly contributing to its economy.

10

Mali

Mali ranks 36th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita for the year 1997. The country has a dam capacity of 1278.82 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its significant investment in water resource management and infrastructure development.

This high dam capacity per capita is indicative of Mali's efforts to harness and manage its water resources, particularly in a region that experiences both seasonal flooding and prolonged droughts. The construction of dams plays a crucial role in supporting agriculture, providing drinking water, and generating hydroelectric power, which is vital for the country’s economic development.

Factors contributing to this statistic include Mali's geographical features, such as the Niger River, which is central to its water management strategies. Additionally, international cooperation and funding for infrastructure projects have likely bolstered the development of dam capacity during this period.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts