Dam capacity per capita 1993
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Canada | 29,001.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Ghana | 8,951.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Iceland | 8,743.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Iraq | 7,905.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,694.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Kazakhstan | 4,628.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Australia | 4,389.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Brazil | 3,836.79 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Finland | 3,671.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Argentina | 3,519.44 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Azerbaijan | 2,849.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Côte d'Ivoire | 2,711.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Egypt | 2,673.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Laos | 1,509.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Cameroon | 1,263.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Albania | 1,229.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Guyana | 1,074.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Honduras | 1,062.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Greece | 1,044.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Kenya | 985.801 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Chile | 801.675 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Bulgaria | 765.65 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 745.912 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | El Salvador | 685.341 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Georgia | 657.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Ecuador | 638.258 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Costa Rica | 580.097 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Burkina Faso | 491.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Cuba | 461.266 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Lesotho | 457.671 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Armenia | 401.615 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Latvia | 391.993 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Angola | 348.496 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Cyprus | 331.228 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Botswana | 319.485 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Iran | 297.329 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Czech Republic | 287.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | China | 283.325 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Austria | 269.074 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Eswatini | 260.105 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Colombia | 256.382 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Dominican Republic | 249.271 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Ireland | 243.001 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Japan | 232.137 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | India | 224.092 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Gabon | 206.301 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Croatia | 203.394 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | France | 171.728 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Fiji | 168.276 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Algeria | 167.384 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Brunei Darussalam | 162.519 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Italy | 161.255 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Afghanistan | 134.443 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Belarus | 130.413 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Estonia | 121.315 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Liberia | 110.713 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Ethiopia | 102.782 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Indonesia | 91.845 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Antigua and Barbuda | 76.555 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Nicaragua | 7,186.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Norway | 6,765.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Russia | 5,410.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Paraguay | 5,278.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Mozambique | 5,276.18 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | New Zealand | 4,725.67 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Panama | 3,329.51 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Mali | 1,395.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Mexico | 1,218.02 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Malaysia | 1,155.52 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | North Macedonia | 817.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | North Korea | 808.503 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Portugal | 738.884 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Netherlands | 600.011 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Nigeria | 481.832 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Namibia | 469.632 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Romania | 468.194 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Morocco | 430.673 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Republic of Moldova | 253.471 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Mauritania | 229.956 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Pakistan | 218.194 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Peru | 207.881 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Luxembourg | 145.131 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | 134.558 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Mongolia | 109.962 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Myanmar | 86.312 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Libya | 82.376 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Philippines | 80.749 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Poland | 64.066 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Mauritius | 59.494 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Madagascar | 37.391 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Niger | 9.161 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Malawi | 4.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Suriname | 47,692.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Zambia | 12,077.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Zimbabwe | 9,160.89 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Venezuela | 7,205.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Uruguay | 5,434.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Sweden | 4,124.67 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Uganda | 4,114.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Tanzania | 3,677.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | United States | 2,787.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Tajikistan | 2,637.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Turkey | 2,271.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Thailand | 1,351.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Spain | 1,258.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Turkmenistan | 1,232.39 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Syrian Arab Republic | 984.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Uzbekistan | 978.349 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Ukraine | 901.622 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | South Africa | 684.185 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Switzerland | 481.904 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Vietnam | 452.667 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Togo | 408.197 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Sao Tome and Principe | 298.926 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | South Korea | 291.592 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Slovakia | 285.767 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Sri Lanka | 259.714 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Tunisia | 233.594 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Samoa | 58.216 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Trinidad and Tobago | 55.816 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sierra Leone | 52.921 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 50.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | 29.775 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | United Kingdom | 91.106 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Bolivia | 70.025 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Lebanon | 57.582 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Bangladesh | 54.828 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Guatemala | 47.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Germany | 41.413 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Haiti | 40.807 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Guinea | 33.248 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Oman | 32.048 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Yemen | 26.173 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Hungary | 24.757 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Eritrea | 23.766 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Jordan | 23.367 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Singapore | 22.575 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | United Arab Emirates | 18.434 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Saint Lucia | 18.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Slovenia | 16.827 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Belgium | 14.343 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Seychelles | 13.088 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Nepal | 4.027 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Benin | 4.002 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Denmark | 3.855 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo | 3.468 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Jamaica | 2.225 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Grenada | 0.215 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Cambodia | 0.116 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Guinea-Bissau
- #158
Cabo Verde
- #157
Bhutan
- #156
Belize
- #155
Cambodia
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1993, the measure of dam capacity per capita served as a crucial indicator of water resource management across the globe. Expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, this metric offers insights into how countries manage water storage and its implications for sustainability, agricultural support, and industrial use. By analyzing dam capacity per capita, we can better understand a country's preparedness to meet the demands of its population amidst challenges like climate change and resource depletion.
Global Overview of Dam Capacity per Capita in 1993
The year 1993 saw significant variability in dam capacity per capita among 157 countries, highlighting disparities in water resource management. The maximum value was an impressive 47,692.60 cubic meters per inhabitant, observed in Suriname, while several countries, including Rwanda and Bhutan, reported virtually zero capacity. On average, the global dam capacity per capita stood at 1,712.98 cubic meters, with a median value of 285.77. This indicates that although some countries enjoy vast water storage, many others struggle with limited capacities, underscoring the uneven distribution of water resources globally.
Regional Highlights and Geographic Patterns
Examining geographic patterns reveals distinct regional trends in dam capacity per capita. For instance, countries in the Americas, such as Canada and Venezuela, featured prominently among the top ten, with capacities of 29,001.3 and 7,205.99 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. Meanwhile, certain African nations like Zambia and Zimbabwe also demonstrated significant capacities, at 12,077.2 and 9,160.89 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. Conversely, numerous countries in Africa and Asia, including Rwanda and Bhutan, reported minimal or zero capacities, indicating potential challenges in water security and management. These patterns suggest that geographical features, such as river systems and rainfall distribution, significantly influence a country's dam capacity per capita.
Economic and Developmental Correlations
Dam capacity per capita often correlates with a country's economic development. Higher capacities typically signify more robust infrastructure and investment in water resource management. In 1993, countries with substantial dam capacities, such as Canada and Norway, were among the more developed nations, reflecting their capability to invest in large-scale water storage projects. Conversely, countries with negligible capacities often face economic constraints that hinder such developments. The disparity in dam capacities underscores the relationship between economic resources and the ability to ensure water security, which is vital for agricultural productivity, industrial processes, and overall societal resilience.
Policy Impact and Recent Changes
Policy decisions significantly impact a country's dam capacity per capita. For example, countries like Argentina and Japan saw notable increases in their capacities from the previous year, with changes of +320.06 (10.0%) and +91.98 (65.6%) cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These increases may reflect national efforts to enhance water management infrastructure. In contrast, Iraq experienced a significant decrease of -388.94 (-4.7%), possibly due to geopolitical challenges or environmental factors affecting water storage facilities. Such variations highlight the influence of policy and governance on water resource management, illustrating how strategic investments and regulatory frameworks can improve or hinder a nation's dam capacity over time.
Sustainability and Future Considerations
As global populations continue to rise and climate change poses new challenges, the importance of sustainable water management becomes ever more critical. The dam capacity per capita metric serves as a reminder of the need for strategic planning and investment in infrastructure to secure water resources for future generations. Countries with low capacities must prioritize policies that address deficits and improve water storage through innovative solutions. International cooperation, technological advancements, and sustainable practices will be vital in enhancing global water resource management, ensuring that all nations can meet the demands of their populations while maintaining ecological balance.
In conclusion, the 1993 data on dam capacity per capita reveals significant disparities in global water resource management, reflecting economic, geographic, and policy-driven influences. By examining these patterns, nations can better understand their water security status and take informed steps towards sustainable development and resource management.
Insights by country
Sri Lanka
In 1993, Sri Lanka ranked 83rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 259.714 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water resource management, particularly in the context of its agricultural sector, which relies heavily on irrigation.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Sri Lanka's extensive network of reservoirs and irrigation systems, which were developed over centuries. These systems are crucial for sustaining agriculture, especially in a country where monsoon rains can be unpredictable.
Moreover, the management of water resources in Sri Lanka has historical significance, with ancient irrigation works dating back to the Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa periods. The emphasis on developing infrastructure to support agriculture and mitigate flooding has contributed to the country's position within the global context of dam capacity.
Hungary
In 1993, Hungary had a dam capacity per capita of 24.7565 cubic meters per inhabitant, positioning the country at 132nd out of 164 countries in this metric. This statistic reflects Hungary's infrastructure development in water management and its reliance on dams for irrigation, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita may be attributed to several factors, including the country's historical investment in water resources, geographical characteristics, and the focus on maintaining existing infrastructures rather than expanding new dam projects. Additionally, Hungary's landscape, characterized by rivers like the Danube, has influenced the configuration and necessity of dam constructions.
Interestingly, while Hungary's dam capacity per capita ranks low compared to other nations, it is crucial for its agricultural economy, which depends on effective water management systems. This reliance underscores the importance of continuous investment in water infrastructure to ensure sustainable resource management in the face of climate variability.
Iraq
Iraq ranked 7th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1993, with a significant capacity of 7905.76 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high figure reflects Iraq's extensive water management infrastructure, which is largely attributed to the presence of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers that provide a substantial water resource for dam construction.
The substantial dam capacity per capita can be linked to several factors, including the country's historical investments in irrigation and hydroelectric projects, particularly during the 20th century. Additionally, the strategic importance of water management in Iraq, given its arid climate and reliance on agriculture, has driven the development of these facilities to support both domestic needs and agricultural productivity.
Interestingly, the robust dam capacity has implications for water security and management in Iraq, especially in light of regional disputes over water resources. The construction and maintenance of dams play a crucial role in combating potential droughts and ensuring a stable supply of water for both urban and rural populations.
Czech Republic
In 1993, the Czech Republic ranked 78th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 287.47 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management and infrastructure development following the dissolution of Czechoslovakia, which occurred in the same year.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the Czech Republic's historical investment in hydroelectric power and water management systems. The nation has a network of rivers and water bodies, which has facilitated the construction of dams to support energy production, irrigation, and flood control.
As a central European country, the Czech Republic has also benefited from its geographical position, allowing for efficient utilization of its water resources. In comparison to other nations, this capacity underscores the importance of sustainable water management practices in ensuring water availability for both agricultural and urban uses.
Saudi Arabia
In 1993, Saudi Arabia ranked 123rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 50.6196 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, crucial for a nation characterized by arid desert conditions and limited freshwater resources.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the country's geographical and climatic challenges, which necessitate significant investment in water storage and distribution systems to support its population and economic activities, particularly in agricultural and industrial sectors. Additionally, rapid urbanization has increased water demand, further straining existing resources.
Despite the challenges, Saudi Arabia has made significant strides in water resource management, including the construction of large-scale desalination plants, which are essential for providing potable water in a region where traditional freshwater sources are scarce. As part of its Vision 2030 initiative, the country continues to enhance its water sustainability efforts.
Angola
In 1993, Angola ranked 72nd out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 348.496 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's substantial investment in water infrastructure, particularly in the context of its post-independence recovery efforts following years of civil conflict.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Angola's significant river systems, including the Kwanza and Cunene rivers, which provide opportunities for hydroelectric power generation and water supply. However, the distribution and management of water resources have historically faced challenges due to political instability and economic factors.
In addition to dam capacity, Angola's emphasis on improving water access and sanitation reflects broader efforts to enhance public health and support economic development, particularly in rural areas where access to clean water remains limited. These initiatives are part of the country’s strategy to stabilize and grow its economy after decades of turmoil.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria ranked 51st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1993, with a reported capacity of 765.65 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure, which has historically played a crucial role in its energy supply and agricultural irrigation.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Bulgaria's geographical features, including numerous rivers and mountainous terrain conducive to dam construction. Additionally, the period following the fall of communism in 1989 marked a renewed focus on improving infrastructure, including water resources management, which may have influenced the enhancement of dam capacities.
Notably, Bulgaria's water resources are vital for its economy, particularly in sectors such as agriculture and energy production. The country has historically relied on hydroelectric power, contributing to the overall capacity of its dams and ensuring a stable water supply for its population.
Zambia
Zambia achieved an impressive third-highest dam capacity per capita in the world in 1993, with a remarkable value of 12,077.2 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive hydroelectric potential, largely harnessed from its numerous rivers and lakes, including the Zambezi River, which is pivotal for energy production and water supply.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Zambia's strategic investments in water infrastructure and energy generation, particularly through the development of large dams such as the Kariba Dam, which significantly contributes to the national grid. Furthermore, Zambia's vast natural water resources allow for substantial storage capacity, enhancing the country’s ability to supply water for both agricultural and domestic use.
In comparison to other nations, Zambia's focus on renewable energy sources through hydropower not only supports its energy needs but also positions it as a leader in sustainable development within the region. This emphasis on hydroelectric power has implications for economic growth, energy security, and environmental conservation.
Singapore
In 1993, Singapore ranked 135th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 22.5746 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited natural freshwater resources, necessitating a reliance on engineered solutions such as reservoirs and desalination plants to meet water demand.
Singapore's low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to its small land area and high population density, which create challenges in establishing large-scale water storage systems. The nation has implemented innovative water management strategies, including the Newater program, which recycles treated wastewater into potable water, thereby enhancing its water security.
In comparison to other nations, Singapore's approach to water resource management is considered exemplary, showcasing advances in technology and policy that have allowed it to effectively address its water scarcity issues, despite its relatively low dam capacity per capita.
Uganda
In 1993, Uganda ranked 20th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a remarkable capacity of 4,114.13 cubic meters per inhabitant. This substantial figure reflects the country's investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which plays a critical role in meeting the energy needs of its population and supporting economic growth.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Uganda's abundant water resources, including numerous rivers and lakes, particularly Lake Victoria. The government's focus on harnessing these resources for energy generation has facilitated the development of several large-scale hydroelectric projects, contributing to the nation's electrification and industrialization efforts.
Moreover, this capacity indicates a proactive approach to water management and energy sustainability, essential for a country that has historically faced challenges related to energy shortages and reliance on biomass for cooking and heating. In addition to energy generation, effective dam management is crucial for flood control and irrigation, thereby supporting agriculture, which is a backbone of Uganda's economy.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data