Dam capacity per capita 1963

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Brazil flag
Brazil
5,386.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Australia flag
Australia
1,901.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Botswana flag
Botswana
393.333 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
264.388 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Argentina flag
Argentina
220.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
124.942 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
114.628 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Algeria flag
Algeria
105.72 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Albania flag
Albania
78.156 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Angola flag
Angola
29.935 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Austria flag
Austria
62.644 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Canada flag
Canada
11,125.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Chile flag
Chile
885.563 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
444.973 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
225.021 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
China flag
China
224.137 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Colombia flag
Colombia
92.675 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
70.976 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
33.675 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
16.758 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Congo flag
Congo
7.435 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Cuba flag
Cuba
5.427 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Denmark flag
Denmark
4.27 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Belgium flag
Belgium
3.89 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.991 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1.205 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
0.607 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
0.111 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
43
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
328.526 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Egypt flag
Egypt
213.006 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
12,793.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Finland flag
Finland
3,233.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Kenya flag
Kenya
2,320.21 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
1,073.85 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Iran flag
Iran
396.142 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Ireland flag
Ireland
305.659 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Guyana flag
Guyana
299.094 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
India flag
India
183.806 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
France flag
France
120.993 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
111.657 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Italy flag
Italy
86.641 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Haiti flag
Haiti
72.918 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Greece flag
Greece
57.726 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Germany flag
Germany
28.307 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Ghana flag
Ghana
16.963 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Guinea flag
Guinea
3.732 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.107 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.062 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Japan flag
Japan
70.691 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
31.584 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
3.167 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Hungary flag
Hungary
0.516 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Honduras flag
Honduras
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Iceland flag
Iceland
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Jordan flag
Jordan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Laos flag
Laos
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Liberia flag
Liberia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
7.951 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
16,170.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Panama flag
Panama
4,723.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
2,562.72 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Norway flag
Norway
2,510.08 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
1,639.72 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,362.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,157.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Namibia flag
Namibia
553.572 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
437.541 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Portugal flag
Portugal
375.296 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Peru flag
Peru
245.178 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
233.348 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Morocco flag
Morocco
165.581 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
157.761 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Romania flag
Romania
91.137 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
88.406 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
84.639 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Mali flag
Mali
30.992 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
27.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
24.213 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Malawi flag
Malawi
9.372 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
83.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
65.062 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
59.778 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Niger flag
Niger
1.352 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Poland flag
Poland
25.448 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Philippines flag
Philippines
17.441 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Singapore flag
Singapore
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Zambia flag
Zambia
27,532 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
23,074.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Uganda flag
Uganda
9,599.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
9,259.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
4,328.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
United States flag
United States
2,560.44 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Sweden flag
Sweden
2,445.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Spain flag
Spain
708.216 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
634.736 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
439.942 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
404.411 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
South Africa flag
South Africa
129.299 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
South Korea flag
South Korea
53.842 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Suriname flag
Suriname
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
57.725 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Turkey flag
Turkey
363.283 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
361.214 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
76.773 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
74.425 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
27.732 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Togo flag
Togo
4.232 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Thailand flag
Thailand
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.886 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Brazil flagBrazil
  2. #2Australia flagAustralia
  3. #3Botswana flagBotswana
  4. #4Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  5. #5Argentina flagArgentina
  6. #6Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  7. #7Bangladesh flagBangladesh
  8. #8Algeria flagAlgeria
  9. #9Albania flagAlbania
  10. #10Angola flagAngola

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Thailand flagThailand
  7. #158Togo flagTogo
  8. #157Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  9. #156Tunisia flagTunisia
  10. #155United Kingdom flagUnited Kingdom

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1963, dam capacity per capita emerged as a crucial metric in evaluating global water resource management. This measure, which calculates water storage availability for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters, plays a vital role in assessing how different nations manage water resources to support agriculture, industry, and community needs. Understanding the variations in dam capacity per capita offers insights into environmental sustainability and development patterns worldwide.

Global Leaders in Dam Capacity

The year 1963 saw Zambia standing at the forefront of global dam capacity per capita with an impressive 27,532 cubic meters per inhabitant. This remarkable figure underscores the nation's significant investments in water infrastructure, reflecting its commitment to ensuring water security and supporting its agrarian economy. Closely following Zambia, Zimbabwe reported a capacity of 23,074.8 cubic meters per inhabitant, further highlighting the Southern African region's dedication to robust water management strategies.

Other notable mentions include Nicaragua, with a capacity of 16,170.7, and Iraq, at 12,793.5 cubic meters per inhabitant. These figures indicate a well-established network of dams supporting these countries' agricultural and industrial sectors. Canada, with 11,125.1 cubic meters per inhabitant, exemplified its abundant natural resources, utilizing vast water storage capabilities to address domestic needs and export demands.

Regions with Minimal Capacity

Conversely, several countries reported minimal to no dam capacity per capita, reflecting disparities in water resource management. Nations like Bhutan and Papua New Guinea recorded a capacity of zero cubic meters per inhabitant, illustrating the challenges faced by countries with limited infrastructure or those heavily reliant on natural water sources. This lack of infrastructure can hinder economic development and exacerbate vulnerabilities to climate change.

The bottom ten countries, which include Honduras, Thailand, and Nepal, among others, highlight a critical need for investment in water management infrastructure. These nations must prioritize developing sustainable water solutions to support their growing populations and diverse economic activities.

The year 1963 witnessed several notable year-over-year changes in dam capacity per capita. Mexico experienced the largest increase, with a rise of 281.16 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating significant infrastructure development to address water scarcity issues and support agricultural growth. Similarly, Finland and the United States recorded substantial increases, suggesting advancements in water management policies and infrastructure improvements.

On the other hand, Zambia and Zimbabwe faced notable decreases in capacity, with reductions of 883.90 and 707.10 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These declines may be attributed to increased population pressure or changes in water management practices, urging a reassessment of strategies to maintain water security and support development.

Geographic Distribution of Resources

Examining the geographic distribution of dam capacity per capita reveals intriguing patterns and disparities across continents. African nations, particularly in the southern region, dominate the upper echelons of dam capacity, showcasing their commitment to harnessing water resources for economic development. Meanwhile, countries in Asia and the Pacific, such as Bhutan and Fiji, face significant challenges in establishing similar infrastructures, often relying on alternative water sources to meet demand.

North America, with Canada among the top-ranking nations, illustrates a robust capacity for water management. This capacity is pivotal in supporting diverse industrial activities and sustaining large urban populations. The presence of vast natural resources and advanced infrastructure development further cements North America’s position as a leader in water resource management.

Sustainability and Policy Implications

The disparities in dam capacity per capita among countries underscore the importance of sustainable water resource management policies. Nations with high capacity can leverage their resources to promote industrial growth and agricultural productivity, while those with limited infrastructure must seek innovative solutions to optimize water use. Ensuring equitable water distribution and access remains a critical challenge, calling for international cooperation and investment in water management technologies.

Furthermore, understanding the dynamics of dam capacity per capita allows policymakers to identify potential vulnerabilities and opportunities for collaboration. By fostering partnerships and sharing best practices, countries can develop resilient water management strategies that support sustainable development and address the challenges posed by climate change.

In conclusion, 1963 presents a compelling snapshot of global dam capacity per capita, highlighting both achievements and challenges in water resource management. As nations continue to grapple with the demands of population growth and environmental changes, the strategic management of water resources will remain pivotal in shaping sustainable futures worldwide.

Insights by country

1

Chile

In 1963, Chile ranked 22nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive capacity of 885.563 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the significant investment in water infrastructure, reflecting the country's commitment to harnessing its water resources for agriculture, industry, and urban consumption.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Chile's diverse geography, which includes the Andes mountains that provide ample opportunities for hydropower generation. Additionally, the country's extensive river systems have facilitated the construction of numerous dams, thereby enhancing water storage and management capabilities.

Interestingly, Chile's focus on hydropower has made it one of the leading countries in renewable energy production in the region. As of the early 1960s, the reliance on hydroelectric power was a crucial component of Chile's energy strategy, which has continued to evolve into the modern era.

2

Senegal

In 1963, Senegal ranked 148th out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates a significant lack of developed water storage infrastructure in the country during that period.

The absence of dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several socio-economic factors, including limited investment in water infrastructure, reliance on traditional agricultural practices, and the challenges posed by the country's geography. Senegal's climate, characterized by a seasonal rainfall pattern, further exacerbates the difficulties in establishing reliable water reservoirs.

Additionally, infrastructural development in Senegal has historically lagged behind that of more industrialized nations, impacting both agricultural productivity and access to clean water. This situation has been a persistent challenge, as water scarcity remains a critical issue in many regions of the country.

3

Cameroon

In 1963, Cameroon ranked 95th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded capacity of 1.20459 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively modest figure reflects the country's developing infrastructure and the overall availability of water resources at that time.

The dam capacity per capita is an important metric, as it indicates the potential for water storage and management, which is crucial for agriculture, energy production, and domestic use. In Cameroon, the limited dam capacity was influenced by various factors including geographical challenges, economic constraints, and historical underinvestment in water management infrastructure.

Furthermore, the significance of dam capacity is underscored by its impact on agricultural productivity and energy supply, particularly in a country where a substantial portion of the population relies on subsistence farming and hydropower. Overall, the statistics from 1963 reflect the broader context of Cameroon’s developmental stage during that period.

4

Denmark

In 1963, Denmark held the rank of 88th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country recorded a dam capacity of 4.26961 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively moderate level of water resource management compared to other nations.

This statistic reflects Denmark's emphasis on effective water management systems, which are vital for agriculture, drinking water supply, and flood control. The relatively low dam capacity per capita may be attributed to Denmark's extensive network of smaller water bodies and rivers, alongside its commitment to sustainability and efficient water use.

Additionally, Denmark's focus on renewable energy and environmental protection has influenced its water infrastructure, promoting practices that optimize existing resources rather than solely expanding dam capacities. Such initiatives align with the country's broader environmental objectives and commitment to sustainable development.

5

Cyprus

In 1963, Cyprus ranked 83rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 16.7575 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to manage and store water resources for agricultural, domestic, and industrial use, which is particularly crucial given its Mediterranean climate.

The relatively modest per capita dam capacity can be attributed to Cyprus's geographic size and population density, which limit the scale of water storage infrastructure. Additionally, the political division of the island has historically impacted investment in infrastructure development, affecting overall water management strategies.

Furthermore, Cyprus's reliance on both surface water and groundwater sources necessitates careful management of its water resources, particularly in response to seasonal fluctuations in rainfall. As a point of interest, the country has faced challenges related to water scarcity in recent decades, prompting efforts to enhance water conservation and management practices.

6

Ecuador

Ecuador ranked 115th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1963. The specific value for dam capacity per inhabitant during this period was recorded as null cubic meters, indicating a lack of sufficient data or the absence of developed dam infrastructure relative to its population.

This low ranking and capacity can be attributed to several factors, including the country's economic conditions at the time, limited investment in large-scale infrastructure projects, and the geographical challenges posed by the Andes Mountains, which may have complicated the construction of dams. Furthermore, Ecuador's focus on agricultural development may have diverted resources away from water management projects.

In comparison, by the early 21st century, Ecuador has made significant strides in improving its water resource management and dam capacity, reflecting a broader trend of investment in infrastructure across many developing nations.

7

Ukraine

In 1963, Ukraine ranked 162nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This low ranking indicates a significant lack of large-scale water reservoir infrastructure relative to its population at the time.

The absence of dam capacity is reflective of several factors, including the historical context of Ukraine, which was heavily influenced by the policies of the Soviet Union. During this period, there was a focus on industrialization and agricultural production rather than the development of water management systems. Additionally, the geographic and climatic conditions in certain regions of Ukraine may have posed challenges for the construction of dams.

As a related statistic, it's noteworthy that many countries with significant dam capacity have utilized these infrastructures for hydroelectric power generation, irrigation, and flood control, all of which contribute to enhanced economic stability and agricultural productivity. In contrast, Ukraine's limitations in dam capacity during this era may have hindered its development in these areas.

8

Eswatini

In 1963, Eswatini ranked 118 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates that the country had insufficient data or capacity to measure dam storage relative to its population at that time.

The lack of recorded dam capacity per capita in Eswatini could be attributed to several factors including limited infrastructure development, economic constraints, and a focus on agricultural practices that relied more on traditional water collection methods rather than large-scale dam construction. Additionally, the political and social landscape of the time may have influenced investment in water infrastructure.

Eswatini's water management strategies have evolved since 1963, as the country has worked towards improving water storage and distribution systems to support its population and agricultural needs. The overall development of dam infrastructure is crucial for ensuring water security, especially in a region prone to droughts and variable rainfall patterns.

9

Brazil

In 1963, Brazil ranked 8th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 5,386.47 cubic meters per inhabitant. This impressive statistic reflects Brazil's extensive investment in hydroelectric power and water management infrastructure during the mid-20th century.

The significant dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Brazil's vast river systems, including the Amazon, Paraná, and São Francisco rivers, which provide ample opportunities for hydroelectric projects. Additionally, the country's emphasis on developing renewable energy sources was driven by the need to support its growing industrial sector and urban population.

Furthermore, this capacity not only highlights Brazil's energy potential but also underscores its commitment to sustainable energy practices. As of recent years, Brazil continues to be a leader in hydroelectric power, producing over 60% of its electricity from such sources, which remains a critical component of its energy strategy.

10

Haiti

In 1963, Haiti ranked 63rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 72.918 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure highlights the country's ability to store and manage water resources, a crucial aspect for agricultural and domestic use in a nation that frequently faces challenges related to water scarcity.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Haiti's efforts to harness its natural water resources, including rivers and rainfall, to support irrigation and hydroelectric power generation. However, the infrastructural development related to these resources has been inconsistent, primarily due to economic difficulties and political instability that have plagued the country for decades.

Interestingly, while Haiti's dam capacity per capita in 1963 was commendable, the country has faced ongoing challenges related to water management, including deforestation and environmental degradation, which have impacted water quality and availability in subsequent years. This statistic serves as a reminder of the importance of sustainable water resource management in developing nations.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts