Dam capacity per capita 2007
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Suriname | 37,663.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Canada | 25,408 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Zambia | 8,048.76 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Zimbabwe | 7,801.43 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Iceland | 7,399.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Norway | 7,020.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Ghana | 6,281.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Paraguay | 6,031.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Nicaragua | 5,822.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Venezuela | 5,700.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Russia | 5,571.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Iraq | 5,346.65 cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Uruguay | 5,205.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Kazakhstan | 4,917.63 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Kyrgyzstan | 4,422.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Tajikistan | 4,026.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | New Zealand | 3,998.73 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Sweden | 3,930.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Brazil | 3,712.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Australia | 3,712.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Finland | 3,517.49 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Mozambique | 3,482.61 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Argentina | 3,287.72 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Uganda | 2,697.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Panama | 2,556.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Tanzania | 2,514.72 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Azerbaijan | 2,440.15 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | United States | 2,437.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Turkey | 2,223.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Egypt | 1,995.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Côte d'Ivoire | 1,770.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Montenegro | 1,623.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Lesotho | 1,443.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Mexico | 1,399.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Albania | 1,333.16 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Thailand | 1,180.75 cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Spain | 1,180.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Laos | 1,170.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Greece | 1,115.54 cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Portugal | 1,102.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | North Macedonia | 1,099.87 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Guyana | 1,069.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Turkmenistan | 1,066.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Ukraine | 1,002.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Mali | 954.158 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Syrian Arab Republic | 940.906 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Cameroon | 864.859 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | North Korea | 861.237 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Georgia | 860.447 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Bulgaria | 859.166 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Malaysia | 831.538 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Uzbekistan | 812.967 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Chile | 792.717 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Honduras | 740.881 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 725.665 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Kenya | 651.05 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | El Salvador | 645.443 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | South Africa | 601.24 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Morocco | 565.187 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Netherlands | 558.575 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Ecuador | 536.808 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Eswatini | 536.341 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Vietnam | 530.495 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Romania | 530.044 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Armenia | 466.217 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Latvia | 456.657 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Angola | 454.565 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Costa Rica | 448.986 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Cuba | 445.824 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | China | 444.495 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Switzerland | 443.119 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Iran | 432.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Belize | 411.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | South Korea | 390.936 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Burkina Faso | 359.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Namibia | 351.002 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Nigeria | 330.578 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Myanmar | 322.701 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Slovakia | 321.127 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Czech Republic | 308.033 cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Serbia | 303.341 cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Botswana | 303.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Republic of Moldova | 292.751 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Sri Lanka | 289.959 cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Cyprus | 278.458 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Togo | 277.533 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Colombia | 257.019 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Austria | 256.444 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Japan | 244.773 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Tunisia | 241.951 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Dominican Republic | 239.402 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Sao Tome and Principe | 229.817 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Algeria | 229.786 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Croatia | 222.894 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Peru | 202.338 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | India | 199.729 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Ireland | 197.792 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Guinea | 190.121 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Italy | 169.985 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Mauritania | 161.652 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | France | 159.874 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Lithuania | 153.248 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Pakistan | 150.607 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Fiji | 148.135 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Gabon | 141.367 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Belarus | 139.661 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Estonia | 136.122 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Luxembourg | 129.094 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Brunei Darussalam | 121.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Indonesia | 97.108 cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Mongolia | 95.86 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | United Kingdom | 85.666 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Ethiopia | 78.708 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Philippines | 78.013 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Poland | 77.745 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Afghanistan | 77.538 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Mauritius | 73.154 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Liberia | 65.031 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Libya | 63.871 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Antigua and Barbuda | 61.454 cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Bolivia | 60.129 cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Samoa | 52.979 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Trinidad and Tobago | 52.345 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Lebanon | 47.067 cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Saudi Arabia | 44.888 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Bangladesh | 43.767 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Germany | 41.908 cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Jordan | 40.268 cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Sierra Leone | 38.265 cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Oman | 34.387 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Guatemala | 33.891 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Haiti | 31.686 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Hungary | 25.553 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Madagascar | 24.286 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Senegal | 21.24 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Yemen | 19.019 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | Slovenia | 16.632 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Singapore | 16.295 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Eritrea | 16.08 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Saint Lucia | 15.499 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Belgium | 13.581 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Seychelles | 10.933 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | United Arab Emirates | 10.858 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Niger | 6.163 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Denmark | 3.662 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | Nepal | 3.184 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Malawi | 3.076 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Benin | 2.625 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Congo | 2.261 cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Jamaica | 2.008 cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 0.846 cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | Grenada | 0.199 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Cambodia | 0.072 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | Bahrain | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Guinea-Bissau | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Maldives | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Malta | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | Somalia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | State of Palestine | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Sudan
- #163
State of Palestine
- #162
Somalia
- #161
Rwanda
- #160
Papua New Guinea
- #159
Malta
- #158
Maldives
- #157
Guinea-Bissau
- #156
Cabo Verde
- #155
Bhutan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2007, the measure of dam capacity per capita served as a critical indicator of water resource management across the globe. This metric, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, highlights the volume of water storage available for each person in a country. Effective management of dam capacity is essential for ensuring water security, sustaining agricultural productivity, and supporting industrial and community needs. As climate change and population growth pose significant challenges, understanding these capacities becomes increasingly vital to address global water sustainability and development issues.
Global Statistics and Extremes
The statistical overview of dam capacity per capita in 2007 provides a fascinating glimpse into global disparities. With data available for 163 countries, the values ranged dramatically from a maximum of 37,663.60 cubic meters per inhabitant in Suriname to a complete absence of dam capacity in countries like Guinea-Bissau, Papua New Guinea, and Malta. The average global dam capacity per capita was 1,442.83 cubic meters, while the median stood at 303.32 cubic meters, illustrating a significant skewness due to high-capacity outliers.
The top ten countries with the highest capacities, including Canada (25,408 m³) and Zambia (8,048.76 m³), reflect regions where abundant water resources and infrastructure investment are aligned to provide substantial water security. Conversely, the bottom ten countries highlight critical areas where dam infrastructure is nonexistent, underlining the challenges these nations face in managing water resources.
Regional Patterns and Influences
Analyzing the geographical distribution of dam capacity per capita reveals intriguing regional patterns. Countries like Norway and Iceland, with ample natural water resources and geographical features favorable for hydropower generation, enjoy high dam capacities. In contrast, several countries in arid or semi-arid regions, including the Middle East and parts of Africa, face limitations due to both environmental constraints and economic factors.
For instance, the presence of abundant rivers and lakes in South American countries, such as Venezuela (5,700.88 m³) and Paraguay (6,031.06 m³), supports higher capacities. Meanwhile, the lack of infrastructure in countries like Rwanda and the State of Palestine, where dam capacities are reported at zero, underscores the need for international cooperation and investment in water management technologies.
Yearly Changes and Trends
Between 2006 and 2007, notable fluctuations occurred in dam capacity per capita across various countries. The average change was a decrease of 17.90 cubic meters, representing a 0.9% decline. Suriname experienced the most significant reduction, with a decrease of 431.90 cubic meters, marking a 1.1% drop. Conversely, the Syrian Arab Republic saw the largest increase, with a gain of 100.02 cubic meters, translating to an 11.9% rise, driven by strategic investments in water infrastructure projects.
Such shifts reflect the dynamic nature of global water resource management, influenced by factors like climate variability, infrastructural developments, and changes in population dynamics. Countries experiencing improvements often benefit from targeted investments in dam infrastructure, whereas decreases may result from prolonged droughts or increased water consumption due to population growth.
Sustainability and Development Implications
The implications of dam capacity per capita extend beyond immediate water security concerns, affecting long-term sustainability and development. Countries with robust dam capacities, such as Ghana (6,281.31 m³) and Nicaragua (5,822.09 m³), are better positioned to support agricultural productivity and mitigate the impacts of climate change through efficient water management. These capacities contribute to enhanced food security and economic stability, fostering greater resilience against environmental uncertainties.
In contrast, nations with limited or no dam infrastructure may face significant challenges in meeting the water needs of their populations, potentially impeding economic growth and exacerbating social inequalities. Addressing these disparities requires comprehensive policies and international collaboration focused on sustainable water management practices and innovative technologies to harness and conserve water resources effectively.
Overall, the 2007 data on dam capacity per capita underscores the critical role of effective water resource management in sustaining human development and ecological balance. As pressures on global water supplies intensify, understanding and optimizing dam capacities remain essential for ensuring a secure and stable future.
Insights by country
Algeria
In 2007, Algeria ranked 93rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country had a reported dam capacity of 229.786 cubic meters per inhabitant, which reflects its efforts to manage water resources in a predominantly arid environment.
This statistic is significant as Algeria faces challenges related to water scarcity, which is exacerbated by its desert climate and increasing population demands. The development of dams has been a critical strategy for the government to ensure a stable water supply for agriculture, domestic use, and industrial activities.
Factors contributing to this dam capacity include Algeria's geographical features, investment in infrastructure, and government policies aimed at improving water resource management. Moreover, the country has made strides in recent years to enhance its water storage capabilities, which is essential for supporting its economic activities and ensuring water security for its citizens.
Fiji
In 2007, Fiji ranked 104th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 148.135 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management capabilities and the availability of stored water for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Fiji's geographic and climatic conditions, which include a tropical climate that supports substantial rainfall, but also presents challenges in water storage and distribution. Additionally, the island nation's infrastructure development and investment in water management systems play a crucial role in determining dam capacity.
Fiji's water resources are vital for sustaining its agriculture-based economy, especially in the context of tourism, which is a significant part of its GDP. Notably, the management of these resources is essential for addressing the challenges posed by climate change, such as rising sea levels and extreme weather events.
Benin
In 2007, Benin ranked 148 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 2.62453 cubic meters per inhabitant. This relatively low figure reflects the country's limited water storage infrastructure, which can impact agricultural productivity and access to clean water.
The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including insufficient investment in water management systems, reliance on seasonal rainfall, and the challenges posed by a rapidly growing population. Additionally, the lack of advanced technology in water conservation and management further exacerbates this issue.
Interestingly, Benin's water management challenges are not unique, as many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa face similar issues. Access to improved water sources remains a significant concern, with the need for enhanced infrastructure critical for sustainable development and economic growth.
Austria
In 2007, Austria ranked 88th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 256.444 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's extensive water management systems and infrastructure designed to harness and utilize water resources effectively.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita in Austria can be attributed to its mountainous terrain and abundant water resources, including numerous rivers and lakes. The country has invested significantly in hydropower, which accounts for a substantial portion of its energy supply, thereby encouraging the construction of dams.
Furthermore, Austria's commitment to sustainable energy practices and environmental stewardship has led to advancements in dam technology and water management strategies. As a result, this statistic not only underscores Austria's capability in water resource management but also highlights its role as a leader in renewable energy production in Europe.
Malaysia
In 2007, Malaysia ranked 51 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 831.538 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure, which is essential for both agricultural irrigation and urban water supply.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Malaysia's abundant rainfall, tropical climate, and the government's focus on developing comprehensive water resources to support its growing population and economic activities. Additionally, Malaysia's extensive river systems provide ample opportunities for dam construction, which further contributes to its water storage capacity.
Interestingly, this capacity is indicative of the country's efforts to balance water supply with the demands of industrial growth and urbanization, highlighting the importance of sustainable water management practices in ensuring long-term water security for its citizens.
Nepal
Nepal ranked 146th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 2007. The country had a dam capacity of 3.1842 cubic meters per inhabitant, which reflects its limited infrastructure for water storage and management relative to its population size.
The low dam capacity per capita in Nepal can be attributed to several factors, including its challenging topography, which is characterized by mountainous terrain, and a lack of significant investment in water infrastructure. Additionally, the country has faced political instability and economic challenges that have hindered the development of water resources.
Despite these challenges, Nepal is known for its rich water resources, particularly from its numerous rivers fed by the Himalayas. The country has significant potential for hydropower generation, which could improve its dam capacity in the future. In fact, hydropower is considered a vital sector for Nepal's economic development, with the potential to provide energy not only for domestic use but also for export to neighboring countries.
Switzerland
In 2007, Switzerland ranked 71st out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable 443.119 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic underscores Switzerland's significant investment in hydropower and water management infrastructure, reflective of its mountainous terrain and abundant water resources.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Switzerland's reliance on hydroelectric power, which constitutes a substantial portion of the nation's energy production. The country's extensive network of lakes and rivers facilitates the construction of dams that not only generate electricity but also provide flood control and water supply for agricultural and residential use.
Moreover, Switzerland's commitment to sustainability and environmental conservation has led to the development of advanced technologies in dam safety and management. This focus on hydropower is complemented by the fact that Switzerland has one of the highest rates of electricity consumption per capita in the world, further emphasizing the importance of efficient water resource management.
Egypt
In 2007, Egypt ranked 30th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1995.78 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country’s extensive investment in water infrastructure, particularly in the context of its reliance on the Nile River, which is the primary source of freshwater for the nation.
The significant dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Egypt's strategic management of water resources, especially concerning irrigation and agricultural needs, which are vital for its economy. The construction of major dams, such as the Aswan High Dam, has played a crucial role in regulating the flow of the Nile, controlling floods, and providing a stable water supply.
In addition to its dam capacity, it's important to note that Egypt faces challenges related to water scarcity due to a growing population and climate change impacts. As of 2007, the country had approximately 80 million inhabitants, making sustainable water management increasingly critical for maintaining agricultural productivity and supporting urban areas.
Lesotho
In 2007, Lesotho ranked 33rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 1443.94 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is crucial given its mountainous terrain and reliance on water resources for both domestic use and agricultural irrigation.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Lesotho's unique geographic features, including the presence of the Maloti Mountains, which provide ample opportunities for water storage and management. Additionally, the construction of major infrastructure projects, such as the Lesotho Highlands Water Project, has enhanced the country's ability to harness and distribute water resources effectively.
Interestingly, Lesotho's abundant water resources play a vital role not only in meeting local demands but also in supplying water to neighboring South Africa, which further underscores the strategic importance of its dam capacity. This relationship illustrates the interconnectedness of water management in the Southern African region, highlighting both the opportunities and challenges associated with transboundary water resources.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked 129th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 2007. The country had a dam capacity of 38.2652 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively low level of water storage infrastructure available for each individual.
This statistic reflects the challenges Sierra Leone faced in developing its water resources, particularly following the civil war that severely impacted the country's infrastructure and economic stability. The limited dam capacity per capita can be attributed to factors such as underinvestment in water management systems, insufficient maintenance of existing facilities, and the need for improved governance in the water sector.
Moreover, the low dam capacity highlights the broader issues of access to clean water and effective irrigation systems, which are critical for agricultural productivity and overall public health. For context, water scarcity and management are pressing concerns in many sub-Saharan African countries, where only about 60% of the population has access to safe drinking water, impacting both quality of life and economic development.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data