Dam capacity per capita 1982

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
4,586.87 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
4,180.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,400.76 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Albania flag
Albania
1,257.51 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
666.732 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Angola flag
Angola
493.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Austria flag
Austria
255.444 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
182.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Algeria flag
Algeria
104.253 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
77.503 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
69.784 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
32,911.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,932.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Chile flag
Chile
815.595 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
771.537 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
499.035 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Cuba flag
Cuba
410.147 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Botswana flag
Botswana
302.001 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
China flag
China
272.441 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
240.287 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
227.149 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
171.254 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
135.257 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
124.645 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
48.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.693 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Benin flag
Benin
5.654 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo flag
Congo
4.711 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.866 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Egypt flag
Egypt
3,624.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
756.953 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
354.261 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
23.887 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ghana flag
Ghana
11,745.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
9,100.32 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iceland flag
Iceland
7,013.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Finland flag
Finland
3,854.04 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Laos flag
Laos
2,037.67 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,265.04 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Greece flag
Greece
1,053.52 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
583.871 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Iran flag
Iran
382.427 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Gabon flag
Gabon
278.733 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Guyana flag
Guyana
257.689 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Ireland flag
Ireland
250.033 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
India flag
India
230.045 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
France flag
France
169.261 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Italy flag
Italy
151.959 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Japan flag
Japan
110.623 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
58.285 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Haiti flag
Haiti
50.892 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Guinea flag
Guinea
45.163 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.061 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Honduras flag
Honduras
6.363 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.908 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.155 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Germany flag
Germany
39.216 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.191 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Liberia flag
Liberia
116.671 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
72.015 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Jordan flag
Jordan
2.719 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.473 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
104.138 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
9,297.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
6,129.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Norway flag
Norway
5,691.54 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
5,156.88 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Panama flag
Panama
4,158.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
2,643.68 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,292.18 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
North Korea flag
North Korea
950.47 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Portugal flag
Portugal
658.275 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Namibia flag
Namibia
649.723 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
531.431 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Morocco flag
Morocco
507.385 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
450.261 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
444.523 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Romania flag
Romania
372.286 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
308.724 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mali flag
Mali
298.339 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
148.681 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
140.027 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
64.019 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
51.63 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Malawi flag
Malawi
6.16 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Peru flag
Peru
220.113 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Philippines flag
Philippines
77.245 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
69.923 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Poland flag
Poland
55.333 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Niger flag
Niger
12.801 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Nepal flag
Nepal
5.234 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
21.123 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
380.458 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
68.141 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
53,113.1 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
16,368.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
12,654 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
5,766.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,698.61 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
5,108.05 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,246.63 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
3,036.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,327.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,281.19 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Spain flag
Spain
1,070.26 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,014.75 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
642.12 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
523.092 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
478.925 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
275.004 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
91.461 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
64.551 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
28.507 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
675.945 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
229.009 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
South Korea flag
South Korea
216.713 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
62.26 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
2.398 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
13.246 cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.511 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Albania flagAlbania
  5. #5Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  6. #6Angola flagAngola
  7. #7Austria flagAustria
  8. #8Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  9. #9Algeria flagAlgeria
  10. #10Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  9. #156Sudan flagSudan
  10. #155State of Palestine flagState of Palestine

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1982, the concept of "dam capacity per capita" was a crucial indicator of how nations managed their water resources in relation to their populations. This metric, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, sheds light on the sustainability of water management practices and their implications for economic and social development. The ability to store water efficiently is vital for ensuring water security, supporting agricultural needs, sustaining industries, and nurturing communities, especially in a world facing increasing environmental challenges.

Global Landscape Analysis

In 1982, data from 126 countries revealed significant disparities in dam capacity per capita. Suriname led the world with an astounding 53,113.10 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its extensive water resources relative to its population size. Canada followed with 32,911.10 cubic meters, benefiting from its vast landscapes and numerous water bodies. On the other hand, several countries, including Cambodia, Rwanda, and Fiji, reported no dam capacity per capita, highlighting potential vulnerabilities in water resource management.

The average dam capacity per capita globally was 2,022.12 cubic meters, but the median was significantly lower at 257.69 cubic meters. This discrepancy suggests that while a few countries have exceptionally high capacities, a majority have relatively modest or even negligible capacities. Such variations can be attributed to geographic, climatic, and economic factors that influence a nation's ability to build and maintain dam infrastructure.

Regional Comparisons and Implications

Analyzing regional data unveils stark contrasts. Africa showcased diverse results, with Zambia and Zimbabwe boasting high capacities of 16,368.2 and 12,654 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively, thanks to their significant investments in dam infrastructure. Conversely, countries like Rwanda reported zero capacity, possibly due to limited resources or political constraints on infrastructure development.

The Americas displayed a wide range of outcomes. While Canada was at the forefront, countries like Nicaragua and Suriname also showed substantial capacities. In stark contrast, Belize and Guatemala had negligible capacities, underscoring disparities within the continent and the potential impact of economic and topographical challenges.

Examining changes from the previous year provides insights into evolving trends. The average global dam capacity per capita witnessed a decrease of 19.69 cubic meters or 10.4%. This decline might reflect growing populations outpacing new dam developments, or perhaps environmental considerations limiting the expansion of dam projects.

Notably, Uruguay experienced a substantial increase in capacity by 938.23 cubic meters (19.7%), reflecting successful infrastructure projects or effective policy interventions. In contrast, Zambia and Zimbabwe saw declines of 534.40 and 497.60 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively, possibly due to environmental pressures or changes in water management strategies.

Sustainability and Policy Considerations

The relationship between dam capacity per capita and sustainability is pivotal. Countries with higher capacities are generally better positioned to manage water resources sustainably, ensuring availability for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use. For example, Iceland, with a capacity of 7,013.62 cubic meters per inhabitant, illustrates how abundant water resources can support both economic activities and environmental preservation.

Policy interventions play a critical role in shaping these outcomes. Nations with proactive water management policies are likely to enhance their capacities, reducing vulnerabilities to water shortages and climate change impacts. Conversely, regions with insufficient policy frameworks might struggle to meet the growing demands of their populations, risking economic and social stability.

Future Outlook and Challenges

Looking forward, countries must balance the need for increased dam capacity with environmental considerations and the social impacts of large-scale infrastructure projects. As populations grow and climate change intensifies, the strategic development of water storage facilities will be essential. Nations like Suriname and Canada exemplify the advantages of abundant water resources, but the challenge lies in emulating such success in more resource-constrained environments.

Ultimately, the metric of dam capacity per capita serves as both a benchmark for current water resource management and a guide for future development. By understanding and addressing the disparities unveiled in 1982, countries can work towards more equitable and sustainable water management solutions, ensuring that all inhabitants have sufficient access to this vital resource.

Insights by country

1

Serbia

In 1982, Serbia ranked 154 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates that Serbia had little to no significant dam capacity relative to its population at that time, reflecting limited investment in large-scale water infrastructure.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including historical economic challenges and the political landscape of the region during the early 1980s. The country was part of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which faced various economic difficulties and was focused on different development priorities.

Furthermore, inadequate infrastructure development, combined with the lack of resources allocated for water management projects, contributed to this statistic. It is important to note that dam capacity plays a crucial role in water supply, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation, all of which are vital for a country’s development and sustainability.

2

Montenegro

In 1982, Montenegro ranked 145th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates a significant lack of developed dam infrastructure relative to its population at that time.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Montenegro's geographic characteristics, historical development patterns, and the political context of the period, which was marked by its status as part of Yugoslavia. The focus on industrialization and urban development often overshadowed investments in water management and infrastructure.

Furthermore, Montenegro's mountainous terrain may have posed challenges for the construction of large-scale dams, which typically require specific geographical conditions to be economically viable. Despite these challenges, the region possesses considerable hydropower potential, which has been increasingly recognized in subsequent years as essential for sustainable energy development.

3

Congo

In 1982, Congo ranked 112th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a measured capacity of 4.71098 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to harness and store water resources for various uses, including hydroelectric power generation and irrigation.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited infrastructure development, ongoing political instability, and economic challenges that have hindered investment in water management systems. Additionally, the geographical diversity of Congo, with its vast river systems, has made the construction and maintenance of large dams logistically complex.

It's noteworthy that while Congo has significant water resources, the effective utilization of these resources has been constrained by external and internal challenges, affecting overall development. In contrast, neighboring countries with more developed infrastructure often exhibit higher dam capacities per capita, reflecting their better management of water resources.

4

Belgium

In 1982, Belgium ranked 105th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 14.693 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for flood control, irrigation, and hydroelectric power generation.

The relatively low ranking indicates that while Belgium has a developed network of dams, the capacity is not as extensive when compared to other nations. Factors influencing this statistic include the country's geographical characteristics, urbanization patterns, and historical investment in large-scale water management projects.

Additionally, Belgium's dense population and industrial activity necessitate efficient water resource management, which may impact the allocation of resources toward expanding dam capacity. In contrast, countries with higher per capita dam capacity often possess larger land areas or prioritize water-based energy solutions more aggressively.

5

Ethiopia

Ethiopia ranked 134th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1982. The country had a dam capacity of null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a lack of significant water storage infrastructure relative to its population at that time.

This low per capita dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including limited investment in infrastructure, economic challenges, and political instability during the late 20th century. The Ethiopian government faced difficulties in developing its water resources, which impacted the overall availability of water for agricultural and domestic use.

In contrast to its historical context, Ethiopia has since made substantial investments in hydropower projects, most notably the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which aims to significantly increase the nation's water storage capacity and electricity generation, reflecting a shift in priorities regarding water resource management.

6

Nepal

Nepal ranked 111th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1982. The country had a dam capacity of 5.23378 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a relatively low level of water storage infrastructure available for its population.

This statistic reflects Nepal's geographic and economic context, where mountainous terrain and limited financial resources have historically hindered large-scale infrastructure development. Despite having abundant water resources due to its rivers and monsoon rains, the country's ability to harness this potential through dam construction has been constrained by various factors including political instability, lack of investment, and technological challenges.

Furthermore, in 1982, Nepal was in the early stages of developing its hydroelectric potential, which is now recognized as a key asset for economic growth. Today, hydropower remains a critical area for development, with ongoing efforts to increase dam capacity and improve water management practices.

7

Bolivia

In 1982, Bolivia ranked 98th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a figure of 48.9198 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure capabilities related to water management and storage, which are critical for both irrigation and hydroelectric power generation in a nation characterized by diverse geographical features.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Bolivia's economic challenges during this period, including political instability and limited investment in large-scale infrastructure projects. Additionally, the country's high levels of poverty and rural population distribution have made it difficult to implement comprehensive water management systems that would enhance dam capacity.

Moreover, Bolivia's significant water resources, including rivers and lakes, have not been fully harnessed due to various factors, such as environmental concerns and the need for sustainable management practices. Understanding the dam capacity per capita provides insight into the broader challenges Bolivia faces in water resource management and economic development.

8

Georgia

In 1982, Georgia had a dam capacity per capita value of null cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking 136 out of 164 countries in this regard. This statistic indicates that the country had insufficient dam infrastructure relative to its population at that time, which could reflect limited investment in water resource management and hydropower development.

Several factors may have contributed to this low dam capacity per capita, including historical socio-economic challenges, lack of technological advancement, and political instability that affected infrastructure projects. Additionally, the Soviet Union's centralized planning may have prioritized other regions for dam construction over Georgia during the early 1980s.

Interestingly, Georgia's geographical features, characterized by mountainous terrain and numerous rivers, present significant potential for hydropower development, which could be a future avenue for increasing dam capacity and optimizing water resource management.

9

Sudan

In 1982, Sudan ranked 160 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, reflecting a significant scarcity of water management infrastructure. The country reported a dam capacity of null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a lack of large-scale dam projects to store and manage water resources effectively.

This low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to a combination of factors, including prolonged political instability, economic challenges, and insufficient investment in water infrastructure. The Nile River, which flows through Sudan, has been a crucial water source, yet the country's ability to harness this resource through dams has been limited.

Historically, Sudan has faced challenges related to its water management policies, which have hindered the development of water infrastructure. Additionally, the population growth and agricultural demands have intensified the pressure on existing water resources, further exacerbating the situation.

10

Norway

In 1982, Norway ranked 12th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 5691.54 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects Norway's extensive investment in hydroelectric power, which is a significant component of its energy production strategy.

The country's mountainous terrain and abundant water resources contribute to its ability to develop large-scale dams, facilitating the generation of renewable energy. As a result, Norway has become a leader in hydroelectric energy, with approximately 96% of its electricity generated from hydropower as of recent years.

Additionally, the emphasis on sustainable energy practices and environmental conservation has further driven the development of dam infrastructure. This statistic not only illustrates Norway's commitment to renewable energy but also highlights the country's proactive approach to managing its natural resources efficiently.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts