Dam capacity per capita 1985

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
4,602.33 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
3,709.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,380.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Albania flag
Albania
1,182.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
666.09 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Angola flag
Angola
441.926 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Austria flag
Austria
267.242 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
175.814 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Algeria flag
Algeria
146.364 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
77.735 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
64.606 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
32,164.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
4,291.95 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1,261.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Chile flag
Chile
909.216 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
710.451 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Cuba flag
Cuba
405.984 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Botswana flag
Botswana
400.02 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
374.139 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
266.632 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
China flag
China
265.523 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Colombia flag
Colombia
255.994 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
205.615 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
173.404 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
45.942 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.662 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Benin flag
Benin
5.178 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo flag
Congo
4.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1.691 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Ghana flag
Ghana
10,870.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Iraq flag
Iraq
9,679.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Iceland flag
Iceland
7,895.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Finland flag
Finland
3,794.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Egypt flag
Egypt
3,315.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Laos flag
Laos
1,879.69 cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Honduras flag
Honduras
1,324.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,133.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Guyana flag
Guyana
1,048.83 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Greece flag
Greece
1,047.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
792.489 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
535.832 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
357.755 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Iran flag
Iran
348.529 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Gabon flag
Gabon
256.792 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Ireland flag
Ireland
246.087 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
India flag
India
238.317 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Fiji flag
Fiji
183.762 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Japan flag
Japan
115.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Liberia flag
Liberia
106.492 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
72.547 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
68.379 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
58.744 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Haiti flag
Haiti
47.974 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Germany flag
Germany
40.784 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
34.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
70
France flag
France
174.691 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Italy flag
Italy
153.626 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Guinea flag
Guinea
42.243 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.31 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.911 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.187 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.379 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Jordan flag
Jordan
2.375 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
100.004 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
8,625.56 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
6,559.71 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Norway flag
Norway
6,037.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
5,777.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
5,069.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Panama flag
Panama
3,956.08 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
1,456.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,258.11 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
North Korea flag
North Korea
909.583 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Portugal flag
Portugal
676.138 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Namibia flag
Namibia
607.379 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
474.024 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Morocco flag
Morocco
471.503 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
443.911 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Romania flag
Romania
432.194 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
281.759 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mali flag
Mali
280.011 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
148.361 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
130.106 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
65.723 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
47.297 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Malawi flag
Malawi
5.479 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Peru flag
Peru
218.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Philippines flag
Philippines
98.763 cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
95.719 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
65.838 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Poland flag
Poland
54.448 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Niger flag
Niger
11.712 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Nepal flag
Nepal
4.881 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Oman flag
Oman
9.166 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
20.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
358.924 cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
68.881 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
51,683.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
14,914.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
11,366.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
5,662.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Uganda flag
Uganda
5,324.93 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
4,630.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,306.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
2,972.75 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Thailand flag
Thailand
1,396.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,224.51 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Spain flag
Spain
1,075.94 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,062.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
685.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
516.693 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
473.038 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
270.447 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
91.468 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
60.466 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
27.385 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
810.662 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
232.641 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
South Korea flag
South Korea
211.787 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
60.192 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
2.171 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
11.584 cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.51 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Albania flagAlbania
  5. #5Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  6. #6Angola flagAngola
  7. #7Austria flagAustria
  8. #8Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  9. #9Algeria flagAlgeria
  10. #10Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  9. #156Sudan flagSudan
  10. #155State of Palestine flagState of Palestine

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1985, the global landscape of dam capacity per capita provided crucial insights into how countries managed their water resources. This metric, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, highlighted the disparities in water storage capabilities across the world. Understanding dam capacity per capita is vital for assessing water security, supporting agriculture, industry, and community needs, and planning for sustainable development. This article explores the patterns and implications of dam capacity per capita in 1985, analyzing the top and bottom performers, regional trends, and year-over-year changes in this crucial environmental metric.

Top Performers in 1985

In 1985, Suriname emerged as the leader in dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 51,683.3 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure dwarfed that of other countries, highlighting Suriname's significant investment in water resource management. Following Suriname, Canada and Zambia reported substantial capacities of 32,164.6 and 14,914.3 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These countries had prioritized the construction of large dams, ensuring ample water storage to support their populations and industries. The top ten also included nations like Zimbabwe, Ghana, and Iceland, each demonstrating a commitment to securing water resources for their citizens.

Struggling Nations in 1985

At the other end of the spectrum, several countries faced challenges in water storage capabilities. Cambodia, Belize, Bhutan, Cabo Verde, and Rwanda reported a dam capacity per capita of zero, indicating either non-existent or negligible water storage infrastructure. These countries faced significant obstacles in managing their water resources, impacting agricultural productivity and access to clean water. Slightly better but still struggling were Grenada, Yemen, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with capacities ranging from 0.19 to 1.69 cubic meters per inhabitant. Addressing these deficiencies was crucial for improving water security and supporting development in these regions.

Regional Disparities and Geographic Influences

Geographic factors played a significant role in the disparities observed in dam capacity per capita in 1985. Countries with extensive river systems and favorable topography, such as Canada and Norway, were naturally better positioned to develop large-scale dam projects. Conversely, nations with arid climates or challenging landscapes, like many in Africa and the Middle East, faced inherent difficulties in expanding their water storage infrastructure. This regional disparity highlighted the need for tailored strategies to improve water resource management, taking into account each country's unique environmental conditions.

Year-over-Year Changes in Water Storage

While the average global dam capacity per capita saw a slight decline of 3.90 cubic meters per inhabitant, certain countries experienced significant changes in their water storage capabilities. Honduras, in particular, saw an astounding increase of 1,318.36 cubic meters per inhabitant, marking a 21,980.7% surge. This dramatic improvement was likely due to new dam constructions or expansions. In contrast, Suriname, despite its leading position, experienced a decrease of 646.30 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting potential challenges in maintaining or expanding its infrastructure. These shifts underscored the dynamic nature of water resource management and the ongoing need for investment and innovation.

Sustainability and Future Outlook

Analyzing the dam capacity per capita in 1985 provides a window into the sustainability of water management practices at the time. Countries with high capacities were better prepared to face challenges related to water scarcity and could support growing populations and industrial demands. However, the significant disparities between nations highlighted a pressing need for international collaboration and knowledge sharing. As the world moved forward, focusing on sustainable and equitable water resource management would be critical in ensuring that all countries could meet their citizens' needs and adapt to the challenges posed by climate change and population growth.

In conclusion, the dam capacity per capita in 1985 revealed both successes and challenges in global water resource management. The data emphasized the importance of strategic infrastructure development and the need to address regional disparities. By learning from the past and fostering innovation, countries can work towards a more secure and sustainable water future.

Insights by country

1

Panama

In 1985, Panama ranked 19th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3,956.08 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high per capita dam capacity reflects the country's extensive investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which is crucial for its energy needs and agricultural irrigation.

The robust dam capacity is likely influenced by Panama's geographical features, including its mountainous terrain and abundant rainfall, which contribute to the viability of large-scale water reservoir projects. Additionally, the government's focus on hydropower as a sustainable energy source has resulted in a reliance on dams for electricity generation, further enhancing the country's capacity metrics.

Interestingly, Panama's emphasis on hydroelectric power not only supports domestic energy consumption but also positions the country as a potential energy exporter in the region. This capacity has implications for both economic development and environmental sustainability, showcasing the dual role of water resources in fostering growth while requiring careful management.

2

Niger

Niger ranked 110 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1985. The country had a dam capacity of 11.7118 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its limited water resource management and infrastructure development at that time.

This statistic indicates the challenges Niger faced regarding water availability, which is critical in a predominantly arid region. Factors contributing to this low dam capacity include geographical constraints, a lack of investment in water infrastructure, and a high dependency on seasonal rainfall, which often leads to variability in water supply.

Additionally, it's noteworthy that Niger's water management practices have evolved since 1985, as the country has sought to improve water access through various initiatives. The reliance on dams for irrigation and drinking water remains a crucial aspect of Niger's development strategy, especially in light of its growing population and the impacts of climate change.

3

Sudan

In 1985, Sudan ranked 160th out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, which was recorded at null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the country's significant challenges in water resource management and infrastructure development during that period.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to a combination of factors, including prolonged civil conflict, economic instability, and inadequate investment in water infrastructure. The lack of significant dam projects has resulted in limited capacity to store and manage water resources effectively, which is crucial for agricultural and domestic use, particularly in a country with a predominantly arid climate.

Additionally, Sudan's reliance on the Nile River for its water supply underscores the importance of river management and cooperation with neighboring countries. Despite its vast land area and potential for agricultural expansion, the country has struggled to harness its water resources effectively, leading to challenges in food security and economic development.

4

North Korea

In 1985, North Korea achieved a notable ranking of 38th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country had a dam capacity of 909.583 cubic meters per inhabitant, which reflects a significant investment in water management infrastructure, particularly in the context of agricultural irrigation and hydroelectric power generation.

This high capacity per capita can be attributed to North Korea's emphasis on self-reliance and industrial development during the era, as well as its geographic features, which include numerous rivers and mountainous terrain conducive to dam construction. The state prioritized the development of such infrastructure to support its planned economy and mitigate the impact of seasonal flooding and droughts.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that North Korea's focus on dam construction and water resources management is part of a broader strategy to enhance energy production and agricultural output, aiming for greater food security and economic stability during a time of international isolation and limited resources.

5

Burkina Faso

In 1985, Burkina Faso ranked 57th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 374.139 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage its water resources effectively, particularly in a region that experiences both droughts and seasonal flooding.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the government's initiatives to improve water management and agricultural productivity, which are crucial in a country where agriculture employs a large portion of the population. Additionally, the presence of several dams across the country has facilitated irrigation and water supply, contributing to food security and economic stability.

Furthermore, this capacity is indicative of the challenges Burkina Faso faces, including its vulnerability to climate change and water scarcity. With over half of its population relying on agriculture, the ability to store and manage water resources is vital for sustaining livelihoods and enhancing resilience against environmental fluctuations.

6

Egypt

In 1985, Egypt ranked 23rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 3,315.2 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects the country's significant investment in water management and infrastructure, particularly given its reliance on the Nile River for freshwater resources.

The substantial dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Egypt's efforts to harness the Nile's waters through various dams, including the famous Aswan High Dam, completed in the 1970s. This infrastructure has played a crucial role in agricultural irrigation, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation, which are essential for the country’s economy and food security.

Additionally, the strategic management of water resources in Egypt is critical due to the country's arid climate and growing population, which places increasing pressure on available freshwater supplies. The reliance on extensive irrigation systems and dams underscores the importance of water management in ensuring sustainable development in Egypt.

7

Cameroon

In 1985, Cameroon ranked 29th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a significant 1261.11 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity indicates a relatively advanced infrastructure for water management, which is crucial for agricultural, industrial, and domestic uses in the country.

The substantial dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including Cameroon’s diverse topography, which encompasses mountains, rivers, and lakes, facilitating the construction of large reservoirs. Additionally, the government's emphasis on hydropower development during this period aimed to harness the country's abundant water resources to support economic growth.

It is noteworthy that this capacity plays a vital role in mitigating water shortages, especially in rural areas, where access to clean water is essential for health and agriculture. Furthermore, investments in dam infrastructure during the late 20th century have had lasting impacts on Cameroon’s socio-economic development, highlighting the importance of water resource management in national planning.

8

Botswana

Botswana ranks 56th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita as of 1985. The country's dam capacity was recorded at 400.02 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its significant investment in water infrastructure to support its population and agricultural needs.

This statistic highlights Botswana's efforts to manage its water resources effectively, especially in a region characterized by arid conditions and variable rainfall. The establishment of dams has been crucial for irrigation, drinking water supply, and hydroelectric power generation, which are vital for sustaining economic growth and food security.

Factors contributing to this dam capacity include government policies aimed at water conservation, investments in infrastructure, and the necessity to mitigate the impacts of droughts. Moreover, Botswana's commitment to sustainable water management practices has allowed it to maintain a relatively high dam capacity per capita compared to many other countries in the region.

9

Cabo Verde

Cabo Verde ranked 131 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1985. The country reported a dam capacity of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population at that time.

This statistic reflects the challenges faced by Cabo Verde, an archipelago with limited freshwater resources, which are exacerbated by its geographical characteristics and climatic conditions. The country's reliance on rainfall and vulnerability to drought conditions have historically hindered the development of extensive water management systems.

Factors contributing to this low dam capacity include the small size of the islands, economic constraints, and limited investment in infrastructure. Additionally, Cabo Verde's arid environment necessitates innovative solutions for water management, yet the infrastructure required to support such innovations was insufficient during the mid-1980s.

10

Haiti

In 1985, Haiti had a dam capacity per capita of 47.9739 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 100th out of 164 countries in this metric. This relatively low capacity reflects the challenges Haiti faced in managing its water resources and infrastructure development during this period.

The limited dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Haiti's economic struggles, political instability, and natural disasters that have historically impacted the country. These challenges hindered investment in essential infrastructure, including water management systems.

Additionally, it is notable that Haiti's water supply and distribution systems have been underdeveloped due to ongoing issues such as high poverty rates and insufficient government investment in public services. As a result, the country has faced significant difficulties in providing reliable access to clean water and managing its water resources effectively.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts