Dam capacity per capita 1985
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Australia | 4,602.33 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3,709.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 3,380.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Albania | 1,182.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Bulgaria | 666.09 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Angola | 441.926 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Austria | 267.242 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Afghanistan | 175.814 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Algeria | 146.364 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Antigua and Barbuda | 77.735 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Bangladesh | 64.606 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Canada | 32,164.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Brazil | 4,291.95 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Cameroon | 1,261.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Chile | 909.216 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Costa Rica | 710.451 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Cuba | 405.984 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | Botswana | 400.02 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Burkina Faso | 374.139 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Dominican Republic | 266.632 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | China | 265.523 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Colombia | 255.994 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Brunei Darussalam | 205.615 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Cyprus | 173.404 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Bolivia | 45.942 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 14.662 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Benin | 5.178 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo | 4.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1.691 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Ghana | 10,870.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Iraq | 9,679.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Iceland | 7,895.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Finland | 3,794.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Egypt | 3,315.2 cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Laos | 1,879.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Honduras | 1,324.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Kenya | 1,133.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Guyana | 1,048.83 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Greece | 1,047.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | El Salvador | 792.489 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Lesotho | 535.832 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Eswatini | 357.755 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Iran | 348.529 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Gabon | 256.792 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Ireland | 246.087 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | India | 238.317 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Fiji | 183.762 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | Japan | 115.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Liberia | 106.492 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Indonesia | 72.547 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Lebanon | 68.379 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Guatemala | 58.744 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Haiti | 47.974 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Germany | 40.784 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Ecuador | 34.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | France | 174.691 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Italy | 153.626 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Guinea | 42.243 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Hungary | 24.31 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Denmark | 3.911 cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Grenada | 0.187 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Jamaica | 2.379 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Jordan | 2.375 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 100.004 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 8,625.56 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Paraguay | 6,559.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Norway | 6,037.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | Mozambique | 5,777.9 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | New Zealand | 5,069.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Panama | 3,956.08 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Malaysia | 1,456.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Mexico | 1,258.11 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | North Korea | 909.583 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Portugal | 676.138 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Namibia | 607.379 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Nigeria | 474.024 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Morocco | 471.503 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Netherlands | 443.911 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Romania | 432.194 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Pakistan | 281.759 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Mali | 280.011 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Luxembourg | 148.361 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Mongolia | 130.106 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Mauritius | 65.723 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Madagascar | 47.297 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Malawi | 5.479 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Peru | 218.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Philippines | 98.763 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Papua New Guinea | 95.719 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Myanmar | 65.838 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Poland | 54.448 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Niger | 11.712 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Nepal | 4.881 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Oman | 9.166 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Saint Lucia | 20.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | 358.924 cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 68.881 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 51,683.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 14,914.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 11,366.7 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uruguay | 5,662.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Uganda | 5,324.93 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Tanzania | 4,630.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sweden | 4,306.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 2,972.75 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Thailand | 1,396.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,224.51 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Spain | 1,075.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Turkey | 1,062.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Venezuela | 685.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Switzerland | 516.693 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Vietnam | 473.038 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Sri Lanka | 270.447 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 91.468 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 60.466 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 27.385 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 810.662 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | Tunisia | 232.641 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | South Korea | 211.787 cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 60.192 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 2.171 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | 11.584 cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.51 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Australia
- #2
Côte d'Ivoire
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Albania
- #5
Bulgaria
- #6
Angola
- #7
Austria
- #8
Afghanistan
- #9
Algeria
- #10
Antigua and Barbuda
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tajikistan
- #156
Sudan
- #155
State of Palestine
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1985, the global landscape of dam capacity per capita provided crucial insights into how countries managed their water resources. This metric, expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, highlighted the disparities in water storage capabilities across the world. Understanding dam capacity per capita is vital for assessing water security, supporting agriculture, industry, and community needs, and planning for sustainable development. This article explores the patterns and implications of dam capacity per capita in 1985, analyzing the top and bottom performers, regional trends, and year-over-year changes in this crucial environmental metric.
Top Performers in 1985
In 1985, Suriname emerged as the leader in dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 51,683.3 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure dwarfed that of other countries, highlighting Suriname's significant investment in water resource management. Following Suriname, Canada and Zambia reported substantial capacities of 32,164.6 and 14,914.3 cubic meters per inhabitant, respectively. These countries had prioritized the construction of large dams, ensuring ample water storage to support their populations and industries. The top ten also included nations like Zimbabwe, Ghana, and Iceland, each demonstrating a commitment to securing water resources for their citizens.
Struggling Nations in 1985
At the other end of the spectrum, several countries faced challenges in water storage capabilities. Cambodia, Belize, Bhutan, Cabo Verde, and Rwanda reported a dam capacity per capita of zero, indicating either non-existent or negligible water storage infrastructure. These countries faced significant obstacles in managing their water resources, impacting agricultural productivity and access to clean water. Slightly better but still struggling were Grenada, Yemen, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with capacities ranging from 0.19 to 1.69 cubic meters per inhabitant. Addressing these deficiencies was crucial for improving water security and supporting development in these regions.
Regional Disparities and Geographic Influences
Geographic factors played a significant role in the disparities observed in dam capacity per capita in 1985. Countries with extensive river systems and favorable topography, such as Canada and Norway, were naturally better positioned to develop large-scale dam projects. Conversely, nations with arid climates or challenging landscapes, like many in Africa and the Middle East, faced inherent difficulties in expanding their water storage infrastructure. This regional disparity highlighted the need for tailored strategies to improve water resource management, taking into account each country's unique environmental conditions.
Year-over-Year Changes in Water Storage
While the average global dam capacity per capita saw a slight decline of 3.90 cubic meters per inhabitant, certain countries experienced significant changes in their water storage capabilities. Honduras, in particular, saw an astounding increase of 1,318.36 cubic meters per inhabitant, marking a 21,980.7% surge. This dramatic improvement was likely due to new dam constructions or expansions. In contrast, Suriname, despite its leading position, experienced a decrease of 646.30 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting potential challenges in maintaining or expanding its infrastructure. These shifts underscored the dynamic nature of water resource management and the ongoing need for investment and innovation.
Sustainability and Future Outlook
Analyzing the dam capacity per capita in 1985 provides a window into the sustainability of water management practices at the time. Countries with high capacities were better prepared to face challenges related to water scarcity and could support growing populations and industrial demands. However, the significant disparities between nations highlighted a pressing need for international collaboration and knowledge sharing. As the world moved forward, focusing on sustainable and equitable water resource management would be critical in ensuring that all countries could meet their citizens' needs and adapt to the challenges posed by climate change and population growth.
In conclusion, the dam capacity per capita in 1985 revealed both successes and challenges in global water resource management. The data emphasized the importance of strategic infrastructure development and the need to address regional disparities. By learning from the past and fostering innovation, countries can work towards a more secure and sustainable water future.
Insights by country
Panama
In 1985, Panama ranked 19th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 3,956.08 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high per capita dam capacity reflects the country's extensive investment in hydroelectric infrastructure, which is crucial for its energy needs and agricultural irrigation.
The robust dam capacity is likely influenced by Panama's geographical features, including its mountainous terrain and abundant rainfall, which contribute to the viability of large-scale water reservoir projects. Additionally, the government's focus on hydropower as a sustainable energy source has resulted in a reliance on dams for electricity generation, further enhancing the country's capacity metrics.
Interestingly, Panama's emphasis on hydroelectric power not only supports domestic energy consumption but also positions the country as a potential energy exporter in the region. This capacity has implications for both economic development and environmental sustainability, showcasing the dual role of water resources in fostering growth while requiring careful management.
Niger
Niger ranked 110 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1985. The country had a dam capacity of 11.7118 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its limited water resource management and infrastructure development at that time.
This statistic indicates the challenges Niger faced regarding water availability, which is critical in a predominantly arid region. Factors contributing to this low dam capacity include geographical constraints, a lack of investment in water infrastructure, and a high dependency on seasonal rainfall, which often leads to variability in water supply.
Additionally, it's noteworthy that Niger's water management practices have evolved since 1985, as the country has sought to improve water access through various initiatives. The reliance on dams for irrigation and drinking water remains a crucial aspect of Niger's development strategy, especially in light of its growing population and the impacts of climate change.
Sudan
In 1985, Sudan ranked 160th out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, which was recorded at null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic highlights the country's significant challenges in water resource management and infrastructure development during that period.
The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to a combination of factors, including prolonged civil conflict, economic instability, and inadequate investment in water infrastructure. The lack of significant dam projects has resulted in limited capacity to store and manage water resources effectively, which is crucial for agricultural and domestic use, particularly in a country with a predominantly arid climate.
Additionally, Sudan's reliance on the Nile River for its water supply underscores the importance of river management and cooperation with neighboring countries. Despite its vast land area and potential for agricultural expansion, the country has struggled to harness its water resources effectively, leading to challenges in food security and economic development.
North Korea
In 1985, North Korea achieved a notable ranking of 38th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The country had a dam capacity of 909.583 cubic meters per inhabitant, which reflects a significant investment in water management infrastructure, particularly in the context of agricultural irrigation and hydroelectric power generation.
This high capacity per capita can be attributed to North Korea's emphasis on self-reliance and industrial development during the era, as well as its geographic features, which include numerous rivers and mountainous terrain conducive to dam construction. The state prioritized the development of such infrastructure to support its planned economy and mitigate the impact of seasonal flooding and droughts.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that North Korea's focus on dam construction and water resources management is part of a broader strategy to enhance energy production and agricultural output, aiming for greater food security and economic stability during a time of international isolation and limited resources.
Burkina Faso
In 1985, Burkina Faso ranked 57th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a significant capacity of 374.139 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage its water resources effectively, particularly in a region that experiences both droughts and seasonal flooding.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the government's initiatives to improve water management and agricultural productivity, which are crucial in a country where agriculture employs a large portion of the population. Additionally, the presence of several dams across the country has facilitated irrigation and water supply, contributing to food security and economic stability.
Furthermore, this capacity is indicative of the challenges Burkina Faso faces, including its vulnerability to climate change and water scarcity. With over half of its population relying on agriculture, the ability to store and manage water resources is vital for sustaining livelihoods and enhancing resilience against environmental fluctuations.
Egypt
In 1985, Egypt ranked 23rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 3,315.2 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects the country's significant investment in water management and infrastructure, particularly given its reliance on the Nile River for freshwater resources.
The substantial dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Egypt's efforts to harness the Nile's waters through various dams, including the famous Aswan High Dam, completed in the 1970s. This infrastructure has played a crucial role in agricultural irrigation, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation, which are essential for the country’s economy and food security.
Additionally, the strategic management of water resources in Egypt is critical due to the country's arid climate and growing population, which places increasing pressure on available freshwater supplies. The reliance on extensive irrigation systems and dams underscores the importance of water management in ensuring sustainable development in Egypt.
Cameroon
In 1985, Cameroon ranked 29th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting a significant 1261.11 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity indicates a relatively advanced infrastructure for water management, which is crucial for agricultural, industrial, and domestic uses in the country.
The substantial dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including Cameroon’s diverse topography, which encompasses mountains, rivers, and lakes, facilitating the construction of large reservoirs. Additionally, the government's emphasis on hydropower development during this period aimed to harness the country's abundant water resources to support economic growth.
It is noteworthy that this capacity plays a vital role in mitigating water shortages, especially in rural areas, where access to clean water is essential for health and agriculture. Furthermore, investments in dam infrastructure during the late 20th century have had lasting impacts on Cameroon’s socio-economic development, highlighting the importance of water resource management in national planning.
Botswana
Botswana ranks 56th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita as of 1985. The country's dam capacity was recorded at 400.02 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its significant investment in water infrastructure to support its population and agricultural needs.
This statistic highlights Botswana's efforts to manage its water resources effectively, especially in a region characterized by arid conditions and variable rainfall. The establishment of dams has been crucial for irrigation, drinking water supply, and hydroelectric power generation, which are vital for sustaining economic growth and food security.
Factors contributing to this dam capacity include government policies aimed at water conservation, investments in infrastructure, and the necessity to mitigate the impacts of droughts. Moreover, Botswana's commitment to sustainable water management practices has allowed it to maintain a relatively high dam capacity per capita compared to many other countries in the region.
Cabo Verde
Cabo Verde ranked 131 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1985. The country reported a dam capacity of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population at that time.
This statistic reflects the challenges faced by Cabo Verde, an archipelago with limited freshwater resources, which are exacerbated by its geographical characteristics and climatic conditions. The country's reliance on rainfall and vulnerability to drought conditions have historically hindered the development of extensive water management systems.
Factors contributing to this low dam capacity include the small size of the islands, economic constraints, and limited investment in infrastructure. Additionally, Cabo Verde's arid environment necessitates innovative solutions for water management, yet the infrastructure required to support such innovations was insufficient during the mid-1980s.
Haiti
In 1985, Haiti had a dam capacity per capita of 47.9739 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking it 100th out of 164 countries in this metric. This relatively low capacity reflects the challenges Haiti faced in managing its water resources and infrastructure development during this period.
The limited dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including Haiti's economic struggles, political instability, and natural disasters that have historically impacted the country. These challenges hindered investment in essential infrastructure, including water management systems.
Additionally, it is notable that Haiti's water supply and distribution systems have been underdeveloped due to ongoing issues such as high poverty rates and insufficient government investment in public services. As a result, the country has faced significant difficulties in providing reliable access to clean water and managing its water resources effectively.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data