Dam capacity per capita 1978
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Australia | 4,221.18 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Côte d'Ivoire | 3,788.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Argentina | 3,470.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Bulgaria | 608.708 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Angola | 570.384 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Albania | 335.287 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Austria | 243.083 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Afghanistan | 147.596 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Algeria | 118.339 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Antigua and Barbuda | 78.407 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Bangladesh | 77.209 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Canada | 28,465.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Brazil | 3,966.52 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Chile | 865.054 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Cameroon | 560.486 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Cuba | 364.059 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Botswana | 358.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | China | 276.798 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Brunei Darussalam | 257.388 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Colombia | 219.438 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Burkina Faso | 131.994 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Dominican Republic | 96.855 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Cyprus | 64.271 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Bolivia | 52.639 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Costa Rica | 16.295 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Belgium | 14.767 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Congo | 5.148 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.115 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Benin | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | Egypt | 4,027.56 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | El Salvador | 796.292 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Eswatini | 130.532 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Ecuador | 26.589 cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Ghana | 13,184.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Iraq | 9,966.01 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Iceland | 6,150.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Finland | 3,914.57 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Laos | 2,216.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Kenya | 1,352.92 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Greece | 1,025.99 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Lesotho | 652.553 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Iran | 430.174 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | Guyana | 261.776 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Ireland | 261.025 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | India | 237.623 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | France | 169.142 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Italy | 141.901 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Japan | 107.597 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Haiti | 54.974 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Indonesia | 54.671 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Guinea | 48.587 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Germany | 37.767 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Hungary | 24.052 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Honduras | 7.186 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Denmark | 3.918 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Guatemala | 0.125 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Fiji | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Gabon | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Grenada | 0.114 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Liberia | 131.225 cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Lebanon | 77.94 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Jordan | 3.168 cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Jamaica | 2.602 cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 76.36 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 10,379 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Mozambique | 6,826.23 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Norway | 5,355.96 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | New Zealand | 5,057.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Panama | 4,573.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Paraguay | 2,941.78 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | Mexico | 1,350.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | North Korea | 1,006.22 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Namibia | 647.039 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Portugal | 610.209 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Malaysia | 593.81 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Nigeria | 487.546 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Netherlands | 462.522 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Morocco | 355.905 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Pakistan | 345.379 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Romania | 298.943 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Peru | 241.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Mongolia | 154.372 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Luxembourg | 149.434 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Myanmar | 75.413 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Mauritius | 68.055 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Madagascar | 58.219 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Mali | 24.206 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Malawi | 7.187 cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Philippines | 85.924 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Poland | 57.391 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | Niger | 5.598 cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Nepal | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Saint Lucia | 22.446 cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 51.432 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 52,424.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 18,504.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 15,052.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uganda | 6,303.13 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Tanzania | 5,618.25 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Sweden | 4,271.98 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Uruguay | 3,881.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 3,089.77 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Syrian Arab Republic | 1,509.42 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Spain | 1,091.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Turkey | 1,063.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Thailand | 904.634 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Venezuela | 691.295 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Switzerland | 532.232 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Vietnam | 514.108 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Sri Lanka | 293.769 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 86.29 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 69.941 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 24.612 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 652.932 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | South Korea | 188.688 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tunisia | 126.492 cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 22.746 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 2.698 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.587 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Australia
- #2
Côte d'Ivoire
- #3
Argentina
- #4
Bulgaria
- #5
Angola
- #6
Albania
- #7
Austria
- #8
Afghanistan
- #9
Algeria
- #10
Antigua and Barbuda
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tunisia
- #156
Tajikistan
- #155
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1978, dam capacity per capita served as a crucial indicator of water resource management on a global scale. Measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, this metric provided insights into how effectively countries were able to store and utilize water resources, which is vital for agricultural sustainability, industrial development, and community well-being. With growing populations and increasing demands on natural resources, understanding dam capacity per capita was essential for addressing water security challenges worldwide.
Global Overview of Dam Capacity in 1978
Analyzing the dam capacity per capita across 123 countries in 1978 highlights striking disparities in water resource management. The global average stood at 2066.40 cubic meters per inhabitant, yet the distribution of values was wide-ranging. Suriname led the world with an impressive capacity of 52424.4 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its abundant water resources relative to its population size. In stark contrast, several countries, including Nepal and Benin, reported a dam capacity per capita of zero, underscoring significant challenges in water storage infrastructure. These variations highlight how geographical and economic factors influenced water management strategies globally.
Regional Variations and Influencing Factors
Geographical and climatic conditions played a pivotal role in determining dam capacity per capita. Countries with extensive river systems and favorable climates, such as Canada (28465.8 cubic meters) and Zambia (18504.4 cubic meters), demonstrated high water storage capacities. These nations capitalized on their natural landscapes to develop robust water management frameworks. Conversely, countries with arid or challenging topographies, such as those with a capacity of zero, struggled to establish significant water storage infrastructures. This regional clustering illustrates the importance of environmental factors in shaping water resource management.
Historical Context and Trends
Comparing data from previous years reveals notable trends in dam capacity per capita. Although the average global capacity witnessed a modest decline of 7.8% from the previous year, several countries experienced significant changes. Suriname showed an increase of 485.40 cubic meters per capita, while Zambia also saw a rise of 360.40 cubic meters, suggesting ongoing investments in water infrastructure. Meanwhile, countries like Ghana and Iraq faced reductions in capacity, reflecting possible challenges in maintaining or expanding their water storage systems. Understanding these historical shifts provides insights into how nations adapted their strategies to meet evolving water demands.
Economic Implications of Water Resource Management
Water storage capacity is intrinsically linked to economic stability and growth. Countries with higher dam capacities per capita often possess the ability to support more extensive agricultural and industrial activities, contributing to economic development. For instance, Canada's substantial water storage capabilities facilitated the growth of its agricultural sector, providing a foundation for economic resilience. In contrast, countries with minimal capacities, like those at the bottom of the spectrum, faced limitations in agricultural productivity and industrial expansion. This disparity emphasizes the role of effective water management in driving economic progress and enhancing quality of life.
Sustainability and Policy Considerations
In 1978, the sustainability of water resources became increasingly critical as global populations continued to rise. The ability to manage and store water efficiently was recognized as a cornerstone for long-term environmental sustainability and economic security. Policymakers were urged to prioritize investments in water infrastructure and adopt policies promoting sustainable water use. Countries with limited dam capacities needed to explore innovative solutions and international collaborations to enhance their water resource management frameworks. These strategies were essential not only for meeting immediate water needs but also for ensuring the availability of resources for future generations.
In conclusion, dam capacity per capita in 1978 revealed a complex landscape of global water resource management. The significant disparities across countries highlighted the impact of geographical, economic, and policy factors on water storage capabilities. As nations grappled with the challenges of water security, the insights gained from these statistics underscored the importance of strategic investments and sustainable practices in addressing global water needs.
Insights by country
Guatemala
In 1978, Guatemala ranked 114th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 0.124834 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates the limited water storage capacity available to the population, which can reflect the country's infrastructural development and resource management capabilities during that period.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including economic challenges, underinvestment in water infrastructure, and a focus on agricultural development rather than large-scale water resource projects. Furthermore, Guatemala's geographical features, characterized by mountainous terrain and a varied climate, may pose challenges for the construction and maintenance of dams.
Water management remains a critical issue in Guatemala, as the country continues to face challenges related to water supply, access, and quality. In 1978, this statistic highlighted the need for improved infrastructure to support both the population and agricultural activities, which are vital for the country's economy.
Ethiopia
In 1978, Ethiopia ranked 130th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant lack of developed water storage infrastructure relative to its population at the time.
The absence of measurable dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited investment in water management systems, a predominantly agrarian economy, and the impact of political instability. During this period, Ethiopia was facing challenges related to governance and conflict, which hindered infrastructure development.
Moreover, the country's geography, characterized by highland and lowland areas, presents unique challenges for water resource management. Despite these limitations in 1978, Ethiopia has since made significant progress in dam construction and water management, highlighted by projects like the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which aims to enhance the country's water capacity and energy generation.
Ghana
In 1978, Ghana achieved a remarkable position as having the fifth-highest dam capacity per capita in the world, with a value of 13,184.4 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is essential for agricultural irrigation, domestic water supply, and hydroelectric power generation.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Ghana's abundant water resources, including major rivers such as the Volta River, which supports several large reservoirs. The construction of the Akosombo Dam in the 1960s notably contributed to this capacity, providing electricity and water management benefits to the nation.
Additionally, this impressive ranking underscores Ghana's strategic approach to water resource management during a period of economic development and investment in infrastructure, which laid the groundwork for subsequent growth in various sectors. Such capacity is vital for sustainable development, particularly in a country where agriculture plays a central role in the economy.
Ecuador
In 1978, Ecuador ranked 96th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 26.5894 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's efforts to harness its water resources for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Ecuador's diverse geography, which includes the Andes mountains and the Amazon rainforest, providing both opportunities and challenges for water management. The government has invested in hydropower as a significant source of energy, which has influenced the development of dam infrastructure during this period.
Additionally, Ecuador's commitment to developing its hydroelectric capacity was a response to its growing energy needs, as well as the aim to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. In the broader context, water resource management in Ecuador is essential not only for energy production but also for supporting agriculture and addressing the needs of its population.
Cyprus
In 1978, Cyprus ranked 87th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 64.2708 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to manage and store water resources, which is critical for both agricultural and urban needs.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita in Cyprus can be attributed to various factors, including its geographical size, climate, and historical developments in water management infrastructure. Cyprus has a Mediterranean climate, characterized by hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters, which necessitates effective water storage solutions to tackle seasonal water shortages.
Additionally, the political division of the island since the 1974 conflict has impacted resource management, leading to challenges in developing a unified approach to water resource planning and dam construction. The emphasis on water conservation and infrastructure development remains vital for sustaining the island's water supply amid ongoing climatic changes and population demands.
Brunei Darussalam
In 1978, Brunei Darussalam ranked 60 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 257.388 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic underscores the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for supporting its population and ensuring water availability.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Brunei's wealth, derived from its extensive oil and gas reserves, which has allowed for substantial government spending on infrastructure projects. Furthermore, the country's commitment to sustainable development has led to the implementation of effective water resource management strategies.
Additionally, having a high dam capacity per capita is beneficial for Brunei, as it helps mitigate the impacts of seasonal rainfall variability and supports agricultural activities, contributing to food security. This is particularly important in a small nation where the population relies heavily on both local and imported food supplies.
Georgia
In 1978, Georgia held a ranking of 133rd out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita. The specific value for dam capacity per capita during this period was recorded as null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant lack of available data or infrastructure for water storage at that time.
This statistic reflects the historical context of Georgia, particularly during the late Soviet era, when infrastructure development was heavily influenced by centralized planning. Factors contributing to this low dam capacity per capita may include economic constraints, limited investment in water management systems, and a focus on other industrial priorities.
Additionally, the country's geographic landscape, characterized by mountainous regions, poses challenges for conventional dam construction. As a comparison, many countries with higher dam capacities often invest significantly in hydropower and irrigation, highlighting a disparity in resource allocation and infrastructure development within the region.
Saint Lucia
In 1978, Saint Lucia ranked 101 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 22.4459 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's investment in water infrastructure and its ability to manage water resources effectively for its population.
The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including the island's geographical features, which present both challenges and opportunities for water storage. Saint Lucia, being a small island nation, may face limitations in land availability for large-scale dam construction, yet it possesses several natural water sources that contribute to its overall water supply.
Additionally, the management of water resources in the Caribbean region often involves considerations such as seasonal rainfall patterns and the need for sustainable practices to ensure water availability. In the context of the late 1970s, this statistic highlights the ongoing challenges faced by island nations in balancing development with environmental conservation.
Algeria
In 1978, Algeria ranked 75th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 118.339 cubic meters per inhabitant. This metric reflects the country's ability to store and manage water resources, which is critical for agriculture, drinking water supply, and hydroelectric power generation.
The significant level of dam capacity per capita in Algeria can be attributed to its extensive river systems and the government's focus on developing its water infrastructure. Investments in dam construction were part of broader efforts to enhance agricultural productivity and support economic development in a country characterized by a predominantly arid climate.
Additionally, Algeria's efforts to optimize water storage have been essential in mitigating the impacts of droughts, which are common in the region. This statistic is indicative of the country's strategic planning in resource management, which remains a critical issue given the challenges posed by climate change and population growth.
Honduras
In 1978, Honduras had a dam capacity per capita of 7.18593 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking 105 out of 164 countries. This statistic reflects the country's limited water storage capacity relative to its population, which can be crucial for agricultural and domestic water supply.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita may be attributed to several factors, including geographical constraints, investment limitations in infrastructure, and historical challenges in governance that hindered the development of water resource management systems. Additionally, Honduras has often faced economic difficulties, which can impede the construction and maintenance of dams.
Interestingly, the overall water management strategies in Honduras have been influenced by its climate and topography, which include mountainous regions and susceptibility to hurricanes, affecting how water resources are harnessed and stored. This situation highlights the need for improved water management policies to enhance water security and sustainability in the future.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data