Dam capacity per capita 1978

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Australia flag
Australia
4,221.18 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
3,788.03 cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Argentina flag
Argentina
3,470.57 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
608.708 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Angola flag
Angola
570.384 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Albania flag
Albania
335.287 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Austria flag
Austria
243.083 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
147.596 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Algeria flag
Algeria
118.339 cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
78.407 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
77.209 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
16
Canada flag
Canada
28,465.8 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Brazil flag
Brazil
3,966.52 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Chile flag
Chile
865.054 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
560.486 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Cuba flag
Cuba
364.059 cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Botswana flag
Botswana
358.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
22
China flag
China
276.798 cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
257.388 cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Colombia flag
Colombia
219.438 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
131.994 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
96.855 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
64.271 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
52.639 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
16.295 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Belgium flag
Belgium
14.767 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Congo flag
Congo
5.148 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2.115 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Egypt flag
Egypt
4,027.56 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
796.292 cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
130.532 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
26.589 cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ghana flag
Ghana
13,184.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
9,966.01 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Iceland flag
Iceland
6,150.14 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Finland flag
Finland
3,914.57 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Laos flag
Laos
2,216.45 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Kenya flag
Kenya
1,352.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Greece flag
Greece
1,025.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
652.553 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
Iran flag
Iran
430.174 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Guyana flag
Guyana
261.776 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
Ireland flag
Ireland
261.025 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
India flag
India
237.623 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
France flag
France
169.142 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Italy flag
Italy
141.901 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Japan flag
Japan
107.597 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Haiti flag
Haiti
54.974 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
54.671 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Guinea flag
Guinea
48.587 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Germany flag
Germany
37.767 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Hungary flag
Hungary
24.052 cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Honduras flag
Honduras
7.186 cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Denmark flag
Denmark
3.918 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.125 cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.114 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Liberia flag
Liberia
131.225 cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
77.94 cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Jordan flag
Jordan
3.168 cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
2.602 cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
76.36 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
10,379 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
6,826.23 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Norway flag
Norway
5,355.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
5,057.91 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
Panama flag
Panama
4,573.03 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
2,941.78 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mexico flag
Mexico
1,350.37 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,006.22 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Namibia flag
Namibia
647.039 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Portugal flag
Portugal
610.209 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
593.81 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
487.546 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
462.522 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Morocco flag
Morocco
355.905 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
345.379 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Romania flag
Romania
298.943 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Peru flag
Peru
241.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
154.372 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
149.434 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
75.413 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
68.055 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
58.219 cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Mali flag
Mali
24.206 cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Malawi flag
Malawi
7.187 cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Philippines flag
Philippines
85.924 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Poland flag
Poland
57.391 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
Niger flag
Niger
5.598 cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Nepal flag
Nepal
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
117
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
22.446 cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
51.432 cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Suriname flag
Suriname
52,424.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Zambia flag
Zambia
18,504.4 cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
15,052.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Uganda flag
Uganda
6,303.13 cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
5,618.25 cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Sweden flag
Sweden
4,271.98 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
3,881.5 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
United States flag
United States
3,089.77 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
1,509.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Spain flag
Spain
1,091.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
Turkey flag
Turkey
1,063.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Thailand flag
Thailand
904.634 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
691.295 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
532.232 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
514.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
293.769 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
86.29 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
69.941 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
Singapore flag
Singapore
24.612 cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
152
South Africa flag
South Africa
652.932 cubic meters per inhabitant
153
South Korea flag
South Korea
188.688 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
156
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
126.492 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
22.746 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Togo flag
Togo
2.698 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.587 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Australia flagAustralia
  2. #2Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  3. #3Argentina flagArgentina
  4. #4Bulgaria flagBulgaria
  5. #5Angola flagAngola
  6. #6Albania flagAlbania
  7. #7Austria flagAustria
  8. #8Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  9. #9Algeria flagAlgeria
  10. #10Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Togo flagTogo
  7. #158Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  8. #157Tunisia flagTunisia
  9. #156Tajikistan flagTajikistan
  10. #155Sudan flagSudan

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

In 1978, dam capacity per capita served as a crucial indicator of water resource management on a global scale. Measured in cubic meters per inhabitant, this metric provided insights into how effectively countries were able to store and utilize water resources, which is vital for agricultural sustainability, industrial development, and community well-being. With growing populations and increasing demands on natural resources, understanding dam capacity per capita was essential for addressing water security challenges worldwide.

Global Overview of Dam Capacity in 1978

Analyzing the dam capacity per capita across 123 countries in 1978 highlights striking disparities in water resource management. The global average stood at 2066.40 cubic meters per inhabitant, yet the distribution of values was wide-ranging. Suriname led the world with an impressive capacity of 52424.4 cubic meters per inhabitant, reflecting its abundant water resources relative to its population size. In stark contrast, several countries, including Nepal and Benin, reported a dam capacity per capita of zero, underscoring significant challenges in water storage infrastructure. These variations highlight how geographical and economic factors influenced water management strategies globally.

Regional Variations and Influencing Factors

Geographical and climatic conditions played a pivotal role in determining dam capacity per capita. Countries with extensive river systems and favorable climates, such as Canada (28465.8 cubic meters) and Zambia (18504.4 cubic meters), demonstrated high water storage capacities. These nations capitalized on their natural landscapes to develop robust water management frameworks. Conversely, countries with arid or challenging topographies, such as those with a capacity of zero, struggled to establish significant water storage infrastructures. This regional clustering illustrates the importance of environmental factors in shaping water resource management.

Historical Context and Trends

Comparing data from previous years reveals notable trends in dam capacity per capita. Although the average global capacity witnessed a modest decline of 7.8% from the previous year, several countries experienced significant changes. Suriname showed an increase of 485.40 cubic meters per capita, while Zambia also saw a rise of 360.40 cubic meters, suggesting ongoing investments in water infrastructure. Meanwhile, countries like Ghana and Iraq faced reductions in capacity, reflecting possible challenges in maintaining or expanding their water storage systems. Understanding these historical shifts provides insights into how nations adapted their strategies to meet evolving water demands.

Economic Implications of Water Resource Management

Water storage capacity is intrinsically linked to economic stability and growth. Countries with higher dam capacities per capita often possess the ability to support more extensive agricultural and industrial activities, contributing to economic development. For instance, Canada's substantial water storage capabilities facilitated the growth of its agricultural sector, providing a foundation for economic resilience. In contrast, countries with minimal capacities, like those at the bottom of the spectrum, faced limitations in agricultural productivity and industrial expansion. This disparity emphasizes the role of effective water management in driving economic progress and enhancing quality of life.

Sustainability and Policy Considerations

In 1978, the sustainability of water resources became increasingly critical as global populations continued to rise. The ability to manage and store water efficiently was recognized as a cornerstone for long-term environmental sustainability and economic security. Policymakers were urged to prioritize investments in water infrastructure and adopt policies promoting sustainable water use. Countries with limited dam capacities needed to explore innovative solutions and international collaborations to enhance their water resource management frameworks. These strategies were essential not only for meeting immediate water needs but also for ensuring the availability of resources for future generations.

In conclusion, dam capacity per capita in 1978 revealed a complex landscape of global water resource management. The significant disparities across countries highlighted the impact of geographical, economic, and policy factors on water storage capabilities. As nations grappled with the challenges of water security, the insights gained from these statistics underscored the importance of strategic investments and sustainable practices in addressing global water needs.

Insights by country

1

Guatemala

In 1978, Guatemala ranked 114th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a value of 0.124834 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates the limited water storage capacity available to the population, which can reflect the country's infrastructural development and resource management capabilities during that period.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including economic challenges, underinvestment in water infrastructure, and a focus on agricultural development rather than large-scale water resource projects. Furthermore, Guatemala's geographical features, characterized by mountainous terrain and a varied climate, may pose challenges for the construction and maintenance of dams.

Water management remains a critical issue in Guatemala, as the country continues to face challenges related to water supply, access, and quality. In 1978, this statistic highlighted the need for improved infrastructure to support both the population and agricultural activities, which are vital for the country's economy.

2

Ethiopia

In 1978, Ethiopia ranked 130th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant lack of developed water storage infrastructure relative to its population at the time.

The absence of measurable dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including limited investment in water management systems, a predominantly agrarian economy, and the impact of political instability. During this period, Ethiopia was facing challenges related to governance and conflict, which hindered infrastructure development.

Moreover, the country's geography, characterized by highland and lowland areas, presents unique challenges for water resource management. Despite these limitations in 1978, Ethiopia has since made significant progress in dam construction and water management, highlighted by projects like the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which aims to enhance the country's water capacity and energy generation.

3

Ghana

In 1978, Ghana achieved a remarkable position as having the fifth-highest dam capacity per capita in the world, with a value of 13,184.4 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is essential for agricultural irrigation, domestic water supply, and hydroelectric power generation.

The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Ghana's abundant water resources, including major rivers such as the Volta River, which supports several large reservoirs. The construction of the Akosombo Dam in the 1960s notably contributed to this capacity, providing electricity and water management benefits to the nation.

Additionally, this impressive ranking underscores Ghana's strategic approach to water resource management during a period of economic development and investment in infrastructure, which laid the groundwork for subsequent growth in various sectors. Such capacity is vital for sustainable development, particularly in a country where agriculture plays a central role in the economy.

4

Ecuador

In 1978, Ecuador ranked 96th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 26.5894 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's efforts to harness its water resources for agricultural, industrial, and domestic use.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Ecuador's diverse geography, which includes the Andes mountains and the Amazon rainforest, providing both opportunities and challenges for water management. The government has invested in hydropower as a significant source of energy, which has influenced the development of dam infrastructure during this period.

Additionally, Ecuador's commitment to developing its hydroelectric capacity was a response to its growing energy needs, as well as the aim to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. In the broader context, water resource management in Ecuador is essential not only for energy production but also for supporting agriculture and addressing the needs of its population.

5

Cyprus

In 1978, Cyprus ranked 87th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 64.2708 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to manage and store water resources, which is critical for both agricultural and urban needs.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita in Cyprus can be attributed to various factors, including its geographical size, climate, and historical developments in water management infrastructure. Cyprus has a Mediterranean climate, characterized by hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters, which necessitates effective water storage solutions to tackle seasonal water shortages.

Additionally, the political division of the island since the 1974 conflict has impacted resource management, leading to challenges in developing a unified approach to water resource planning and dam construction. The emphasis on water conservation and infrastructure development remains vital for sustaining the island's water supply amid ongoing climatic changes and population demands.

6

Brunei Darussalam

In 1978, Brunei Darussalam ranked 60 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 257.388 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic underscores the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure, which is crucial for supporting its population and ensuring water availability.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Brunei's wealth, derived from its extensive oil and gas reserves, which has allowed for substantial government spending on infrastructure projects. Furthermore, the country's commitment to sustainable development has led to the implementation of effective water resource management strategies.

Additionally, having a high dam capacity per capita is beneficial for Brunei, as it helps mitigate the impacts of seasonal rainfall variability and supports agricultural activities, contributing to food security. This is particularly important in a small nation where the population relies heavily on both local and imported food supplies.

7

Georgia

In 1978, Georgia held a ranking of 133rd out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita. The specific value for dam capacity per capita during this period was recorded as null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant lack of available data or infrastructure for water storage at that time.

This statistic reflects the historical context of Georgia, particularly during the late Soviet era, when infrastructure development was heavily influenced by centralized planning. Factors contributing to this low dam capacity per capita may include economic constraints, limited investment in water management systems, and a focus on other industrial priorities.

Additionally, the country's geographic landscape, characterized by mountainous regions, poses challenges for conventional dam construction. As a comparison, many countries with higher dam capacities often invest significantly in hydropower and irrigation, highlighting a disparity in resource allocation and infrastructure development within the region.

8

Saint Lucia

In 1978, Saint Lucia ranked 101 out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported capacity of 22.4459 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's investment in water infrastructure and its ability to manage water resources effectively for its population.

The relatively moderate dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including the island's geographical features, which present both challenges and opportunities for water storage. Saint Lucia, being a small island nation, may face limitations in land availability for large-scale dam construction, yet it possesses several natural water sources that contribute to its overall water supply.

Additionally, the management of water resources in the Caribbean region often involves considerations such as seasonal rainfall patterns and the need for sustainable practices to ensure water availability. In the context of the late 1970s, this statistic highlights the ongoing challenges faced by island nations in balancing development with environmental conservation.

9

Algeria

In 1978, Algeria ranked 75th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 118.339 cubic meters per inhabitant. This metric reflects the country's ability to store and manage water resources, which is critical for agriculture, drinking water supply, and hydroelectric power generation.

The significant level of dam capacity per capita in Algeria can be attributed to its extensive river systems and the government's focus on developing its water infrastructure. Investments in dam construction were part of broader efforts to enhance agricultural productivity and support economic development in a country characterized by a predominantly arid climate.

Additionally, Algeria's efforts to optimize water storage have been essential in mitigating the impacts of droughts, which are common in the region. This statistic is indicative of the country's strategic planning in resource management, which remains a critical issue given the challenges posed by climate change and population growth.

10

Honduras

In 1978, Honduras had a dam capacity per capita of 7.18593 cubic meters per inhabitant, ranking 105 out of 164 countries. This statistic reflects the country's limited water storage capacity relative to its population, which can be crucial for agricultural and domestic water supply.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita may be attributed to several factors, including geographical constraints, investment limitations in infrastructure, and historical challenges in governance that hindered the development of water resource management systems. Additionally, Honduras has often faced economic difficulties, which can impede the construction and maintenance of dams.

Interestingly, the overall water management strategies in Honduras have been influenced by its climate and topography, which include mountainous regions and susceptibility to hurricanes, affecting how water resources are harnessed and stored. This situation highlights the need for improved water management policies to enhance water security and sustainability in the future.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts