Dam capacity per capita 1961

Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.

164 data pointsWorldFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

Interactive Map

Complete Data Rankings

Rank
1
Afghanistan flag
Afghanistan
130.235 cubic meters per inhabitant
2
Albania flag
Albania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
3
Canada flag
Canada
11,363.9 cubic meters per inhabitant
4
Brazil flag
Brazil
5,407.99 cubic meters per inhabitant
5
Chile flag
Chile
922.299 cubic meters per inhabitant
6
Côte d'Ivoire flag
Côte d'Ivoire
242.851 cubic meters per inhabitant
7
Algeria flag
Algeria
90.443 cubic meters per inhabitant
8
Angola flag
Angola
26.766 cubic meters per inhabitant
9
Antigua and Barbuda flag
Antigua and Barbuda
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
10
Argentina flag
Argentina
137.477 cubic meters per inhabitant
11
Armenia flag
Armenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
12
Australia flag
Australia
1,927.24 cubic meters per inhabitant
13
Brunei Darussalam flag
Brunei Darussalam
486.538 cubic meters per inhabitant
14
Botswana flag
Botswana
411.977 cubic meters per inhabitant
15
Bulgaria flag
Bulgaria
239.321 cubic meters per inhabitant
16
China flag
China
224.012 cubic meters per inhabitant
17
Colombia flag
Colombia
96.649 cubic meters per inhabitant
18
Bolivia flag
Bolivia
73.711 cubic meters per inhabitant
19
Austria flag
Austria
51.721 cubic meters per inhabitant
20
Azerbaijan flag
Azerbaijan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
21
Bahrain flag
Bahrain
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
22
Bangladesh flag
Bangladesh
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
23
Belarus flag
Belarus
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
24
Burkina Faso flag
Burkina Faso
31.065 cubic meters per inhabitant
25
Cyprus flag
Cyprus
17.088 cubic meters per inhabitant
26
Congo flag
Congo
7.839 cubic meters per inhabitant
27
Cuba flag
Cuba
5.659 cubic meters per inhabitant
28
Denmark flag
Denmark
4.337 cubic meters per inhabitant
29
Belgium flag
Belgium
3.943 cubic meters per inhabitant
30
Congo, Democratic Republic of the flag
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2.099 cubic meters per inhabitant
31
Cameroon flag
Cameroon
1.255 cubic meters per inhabitant
32
Costa Rica flag
Costa Rica
0.363 cubic meters per inhabitant
33
Belize flag
Belize
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
34
Benin flag
Benin
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
35
Bhutan flag
Bhutan
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
36
Bosnia and Herzegovina flag
Bosnia and Herzegovina
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
37
Cabo Verde flag
Cabo Verde
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
38
Cambodia flag
Cambodia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
39
Croatia flag
Croatia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
40
Czech Republic flag
Czech Republic
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
41
Dominican Republic flag
Dominican Republic
0.119 cubic meters per inhabitant
42
Ecuador flag
Ecuador
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
43
Egypt flag
Egypt
224.513 cubic meters per inhabitant
44
El Salvador flag
El Salvador
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
45
Eritrea flag
Eritrea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
46
Estonia flag
Estonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
47
Eswatini flag
Eswatini
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
48
Ethiopia flag
Ethiopia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
49
Iraq flag
Iraq
13,218.3 cubic meters per inhabitant
50
Finland flag
Finland
3,032.62 cubic meters per inhabitant
51
Kenya flag
Kenya
2,506.17 cubic meters per inhabitant
52
Lesotho flag
Lesotho
1,137.42 cubic meters per inhabitant
53
Guyana flag
Guyana
312.427 cubic meters per inhabitant
54
Ireland flag
Ireland
307.644 cubic meters per inhabitant
55
Iran flag
Iran
291.645 cubic meters per inhabitant
56
India flag
India
150.831 cubic meters per inhabitant
57
Lebanon flag
Lebanon
118.914 cubic meters per inhabitant
58
France flag
France
116.105 cubic meters per inhabitant
59
Italy flag
Italy
80.008 cubic meters per inhabitant
60
Haiti flag
Haiti
75.591 cubic meters per inhabitant
61
Greece flag
Greece
58.009 cubic meters per inhabitant
62
Indonesia flag
Indonesia
32.968 cubic meters per inhabitant
63
Germany flag
Germany
28.817 cubic meters per inhabitant
64
Ghana flag
Ghana
17.796 cubic meters per inhabitant
65
Guatemala flag
Guatemala
0.113 cubic meters per inhabitant
66
Fiji flag
Fiji
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
67
Gabon flag
Gabon
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
68
Georgia flag
Georgia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
69
Grenada flag
Grenada
0.063 cubic meters per inhabitant
70
Guinea flag
Guinea
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
71
Guinea-Bissau flag
Guinea-Bissau
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
72
Japan flag
Japan
64.84 cubic meters per inhabitant
73
Jamaica flag
Jamaica
3.257 cubic meters per inhabitant
74
Hungary flag
Hungary
0.519 cubic meters per inhabitant
75
Honduras flag
Honduras
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
76
Iceland flag
Iceland
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
77
Jordan flag
Jordan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
78
Kazakhstan flag
Kazakhstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
79
Kyrgyzstan flag
Kyrgyzstan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
80
Laos flag
Laos
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
81
Latvia flag
Latvia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
82
Liberia flag
Liberia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
83
Libya flag
Libya
8.639 cubic meters per inhabitant
84
Lithuania flag
Lithuania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
85
Nicaragua flag
Nicaragua
17,172 cubic meters per inhabitant
86
Panama flag
Panama
5,017.72 cubic meters per inhabitant
87
Mozambique flag
Mozambique
2,660.96 cubic meters per inhabitant
88
Norway flag
Norway
2,209.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
89
New Zealand flag
New Zealand
1,711.29 cubic meters per inhabitant
90
North Korea flag
North Korea
1,426.92 cubic meters per inhabitant
91
Mexico flag
Mexico
904.791 cubic meters per inhabitant
92
Netherlands flag
Netherlands
449.939 cubic meters per inhabitant
93
Portugal flag
Portugal
375.716 cubic meters per inhabitant
94
Peru flag
Peru
259.852 cubic meters per inhabitant
95
Mongolia flag
Mongolia
247.7 cubic meters per inhabitant
96
Morocco flag
Morocco
174.552 cubic meters per inhabitant
97
Luxembourg flag
Luxembourg
159.917 cubic meters per inhabitant
98
Madagascar flag
Madagascar
93.108 cubic meters per inhabitant
99
Romania flag
Romania
91.41 cubic meters per inhabitant
100
Namibia flag
Namibia
89.415 cubic meters per inhabitant
101
Mauritius flag
Mauritius
88.04 cubic meters per inhabitant
102
Mali flag
Mali
31.921 cubic meters per inhabitant
103
Saint Lucia flag
Saint Lucia
27.811 cubic meters per inhabitant
104
Malaysia flag
Malaysia
25.462 cubic meters per inhabitant
105
Malawi flag
Malawi
9.838 cubic meters per inhabitant
106
Maldives flag
Maldives
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
107
Malta flag
Malta
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
108
Mauritania flag
Mauritania
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
109
Montenegro flag
Montenegro
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
110
Nigeria flag
Nigeria
87.099 cubic meters per inhabitant
111
Myanmar flag
Myanmar
68 cubic meters per inhabitant
112
Nepal flag
Nepal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
113
Pakistan flag
Pakistan
59.251 cubic meters per inhabitant
114
Niger flag
Niger
1.433 cubic meters per inhabitant
115
North Macedonia flag
North Macedonia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
116
Oman flag
Oman
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
117
Poland flag
Poland
22.892 cubic meters per inhabitant
118
Philippines flag
Philippines
18.581 cubic meters per inhabitant
119
Papua New Guinea flag
Papua New Guinea
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
120
Paraguay flag
Paraguay
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
121
Republic of Moldova flag
Republic of Moldova
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
122
Russia flag
Russia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
123
Rwanda flag
Rwanda
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
124
Samoa flag
Samoa
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
125
Sao Tome and Principe flag
Sao Tome and Principe
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
126
Saudi Arabia flag
Saudi Arabia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
127
Senegal flag
Senegal
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
128
Serbia flag
Serbia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
129
Seychelles flag
Seychelles
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
130
Sierra Leone flag
Sierra Leone
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
131
Singapore flag
Singapore
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
132
Slovakia flag
Slovakia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
133
Slovenia flag
Slovenia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
134
Somalia flag
Somalia
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
135
Zambia flag
Zambia
29,324.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
136
Zimbabwe flag
Zimbabwe
24,541.6 cubic meters per inhabitant
137
Uganda flag
Uganda
10,175.2 cubic meters per inhabitant
138
Tanzania flag
Tanzania
9,815.58 cubic meters per inhabitant
139
Uruguay flag
Uruguay
4,432.46 cubic meters per inhabitant
140
United States flag
United States
2,282.34 cubic meters per inhabitant
141
Sweden flag
Sweden
2,185.53 cubic meters per inhabitant
142
Vietnam flag
Vietnam
669.695 cubic meters per inhabitant
143
Spain flag
Spain
644.091 cubic meters per inhabitant
144
Sri Lanka flag
Sri Lanka
424.66 cubic meters per inhabitant
145
Switzerland flag
Switzerland
396.126 cubic meters per inhabitant
146
South Africa flag
South Africa
130.079 cubic meters per inhabitant
147
South Korea flag
South Korea
56.264 cubic meters per inhabitant
148
State of Palestine flag
State of Palestine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
149
Sudan flag
Sudan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
150
Suriname flag
Suriname
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
151
Syrian Arab Republic flag
Syrian Arab Republic
61.261 cubic meters per inhabitant
152
Tajikistan flag
Tajikistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
153
Turkey flag
Turkey
371.841 cubic meters per inhabitant
154
Venezuela flag
Venezuela
304.143 cubic meters per inhabitant
155
Tunisia flag
Tunisia
74.377 cubic meters per inhabitant
156
United Kingdom flag
United Kingdom
67.74 cubic meters per inhabitant
157
Trinidad and Tobago flag
Trinidad and Tobago
6.685 cubic meters per inhabitant
158
Togo flag
Togo
3.858 cubic meters per inhabitant
159
Thailand flag
Thailand
0 cubic meters per inhabitant
160
Turkmenistan flag
Turkmenistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
161
Ukraine flag
Ukraine
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
162
United Arab Emirates flag
United Arab Emirates
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
163
Uzbekistan flag
Uzbekistan
NaN cubic meters per inhabitant
164
Yemen flag
Yemen
0.926 cubic meters per inhabitant

Top 10 Countries

  1. #1Afghanistan flagAfghanistan
  2. #2Albania flagAlbania
  3. #3Canada flagCanada
  4. #4Brazil flagBrazil
  5. #5Chile flagChile
  6. #6Côte d'Ivoire flagCôte d'Ivoire
  7. #7Algeria flagAlgeria
  8. #8Angola flagAngola
  9. #9Antigua and Barbuda flagAntigua and Barbuda
  10. #10Argentina flagArgentina

Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.

Bottom 10 Countries

  1. #164Yemen flagYemen
  2. #163Uzbekistan flagUzbekistan
  3. #162United Arab Emirates flagUnited Arab Emirates
  4. #161Ukraine flagUkraine
  5. #160Turkmenistan flagTurkmenistan
  6. #159Thailand flagThailand
  7. #158Togo flagTogo
  8. #157Trinidad and Tobago flagTrinidad and Tobago
  9. #156United Kingdom flagUnited Kingdom
  10. #155Tunisia flagTunisia

Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.

Analysis & Context

The measure of dam capacity per capita provides a critical insight into the water resource management of a country, reflecting the cubic meters of water storage available for each inhabitant. This metric is crucial for understanding how nations approach water sustainability, agriculture, industry, and community support. In 1961, this measure offered a snapshot of global disparities in water resource allocation, emphasizing the developmental challenges and opportunities faced by different regions.

Global Perspective on 1961

In 1961, dam capacity per capita varied significantly across the world, highlighting stark differences in water management strategies. The global average stood at 1553.79 cubic meters per person, with Zambia leading the chart at an impressive 29324.2 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high number underscores Zambia's robust capacity to harness water resources, largely attributable to its substantial investment in dam infrastructure, which supports both agricultural and hydroelectric needs. Conversely, several countries, including Bhutan and Thailand, reported no dam capacity per capita, indicating limited infrastructure development in this sector.

Regional Clusters and Disparities

Examining the regional distribution of dam capacity per capita in 1961 reveals clear disparities. African countries like Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Uganda exhibited some of the world's highest values, reflecting significant investments in dam projects. This emphasis was part of broader efforts to enhance agricultural productivity and energy generation. Meanwhile, Latin American countries such as Nicaragua and Brazil also demonstrated substantial water storage capacities, driven by large-scale river management projects designed to support burgeoning agricultural sectors.

In stark contrast, many nations in Asia and Oceania, including Bhutan and Fiji, registered values at or near zero. This trend points to a historical lack of investment in water infrastructure, often due to economic constraints or alternative water strategies relying on natural sources like monsoons. The absence of significant dam infrastructure posed challenges to consistent water supply for agriculture and industry, impacting economic growth and development.

Sustainability and Development Implications

The data from 1961 underscores the critical linkage between dam capacity per capita and sustainable development. Countries with higher capacities, such as Iraq and Canada, were better positioned to stabilize water supply for agricultural and industrial use, supporting broader economic growth. The ability to regulate water flow and storage not only mitigated the impacts of seasonal variability but also enhanced resilience against droughts and water scarcity.

For countries with minimal or no dam capacity, particularly those in developing regions, the lack of infrastructure hindered agricultural productivity and increased vulnerability to climate fluctuations. This disparity highlighted the need for international investment and cooperation to improve water resource management, recognizing water security as a cornerstone of sustainable development.

Historical Context and Policy Evolution

The landscape of dam capacity per capita in 1961 was shaped by historical policies and geopolitical factors. Post-war reconstruction efforts in many regions focused on building infrastructure, with dams seen as pivotal for national development. In African countries, decolonization efforts dovetailed with initiatives to harness natural resources for economic self-sufficiency, driving the construction of major dam projects. Similarly, Latin America's push towards modernization included significant investments in water management, driven by both domestic policies and international funding.

In contrast, nations with lower capacities often faced political and economic instability, limiting their ability to undertake large infrastructural projects. Additionally, the emergent environmental awareness of the early 1960s began to influence policy decisions, with growing recognition of the ecological impacts of dam construction. These factors collectively shaped the evolving landscape of global water resource management.

Looking Forward: Lessons from 1961

The data from 1961 serves as a historical benchmark, offering valuable lessons for contemporary water resource management. The disparities in dam capacity per capita underscore the importance of strategic investments in water infrastructure, tailored to the unique environmental and economic contexts of each region. As climate change intensifies, the need for resilient water management systems becomes increasingly critical, highlighting the relevance of past insights for future planning.

In conclusion, the diverse global landscape of dam capacity per capita in 1961 illustrates the complex interplay of geography, policy, and development priorities. Understanding these dynamics is essential for crafting effective water management strategies that ensure sustainability and resilience in the face of evolving environmental challenges.

Insights by country

1

Lithuania

In 1961, Lithuania ranked 132nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a recorded value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates that there was insufficient data or infrastructure in place to measure dam capacity effectively for the population at that time.

The low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including Lithuania's historical context as a part of the Soviet Union, where centralized planning often led to uneven development of infrastructure. The prioritization of industrial and agricultural output over water management and hydropower projects may have further contributed to the lack of substantial dam capacity.

Additionally, during this period, many Eastern European countries faced challenges related to resource allocation and investment in public utilities, which might have hindered the development of water management systems. As a point of reference, the overall hydropower capacity in the region has seen significant improvements in subsequent decades as countries transitioned to independent governance and focused on modernizing their infrastructure.

2

Benin

In 1961, Benin ranked 106th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of 0 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic indicates that, at that time, the country's infrastructure for water storage and management was virtually non-existent, reflecting a significant gap in its ability to harness and store water resources for agricultural, domestic, and industrial use.

The absence of dam capacity can be attributed to several factors, including limited financial resources, underdeveloped infrastructure, and a lack of investment in water management systems. Additionally, the political instability and economic challenges faced by Benin during this period likely hindered the development of essential infrastructure that could have improved water storage capacity.

Notably, the lack of dam capacity impacts not only the availability of water but also agricultural productivity, which is crucial for a largely agrarian economy like Benin's. In subsequent decades, investments in hydraulic infrastructure have been prioritized to enhance water security and support economic growth.

3

Jordan

In 1961, Jordan ranked 126th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This ranking indicates a significant limitation in water resource management and infrastructure development during this period.

The scarcity of water resources in Jordan is historically attributed to its geographic location, characterized by arid and semi-arid climates. The country's reliance on limited freshwater sources, such as the Jordan River and underground aquifers, has posed challenges for maintaining adequate dam capacity and overall water supply.

Additionally, factors such as population growth, regional conflicts, and economic constraints have further exacerbated the situation, leading to a critical need for improved water management strategies. As of 2020, Jordan continues to face water scarcity issues, ranking among the most water-scarce countries in the world, highlighting the long-standing challenges associated with water resource management.

4

Armenia

In 1961, Armenia ranked 100th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The statistic for dam capacity per capita was recorded as null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating that there was insufficient data or infrastructure to provide a measurable figure for this metric at that time.

This lack of dam capacity per capita reflects the broader challenges Armenia faced in its water management and infrastructure development during the mid-20th century. Factors contributing to this situation included the historical impact of Soviet policies, which influenced the allocation of resources and investment in large-scale infrastructure projects.

Additionally, Armenia's geographical characteristics, which include mountainous terrain and a climate that affects water availability, further complicated the development of efficient water storage and distribution systems. The overall water resource management strategies implemented during this period were crucial for shaping the country's future water supply and usage.

5

Japan

In 1961, Japan ranked 63rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 64.8401 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects Japan's significant investment in water management infrastructure during a period of rapid industrialization and urbanization.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the country's geographical characteristics, which include numerous rivers and mountainous terrains that necessitate effective water resource management. Additionally, Japan's commitment to hydropower as a renewable energy source contributed to the development of dams, aimed at providing electricity and flood control.

Interestingly, Japan's focus on dam construction and water management also aligns with its historical context of natural disaster preparedness, particularly in response to typhoons and heavy rainfall, which are prevalent in the region.

6

Cabo Verde

Cabo Verde was ranked 109th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in the year 1961. The country's dam capacity per inhabitant was recorded as null cubic meters, indicating a lack of significant water storage infrastructure at the time.

This statistic reflects Cabo Verde's geographical challenges, as the archipelago consists of ten volcanic islands with limited freshwater resources. The scarcity of water has historically hindered agricultural development and contributed to reliance on rain-fed agriculture, making water management crucial for the country's sustainability.

Factors contributing to the low dam capacity include the islands' arid climate and the economic constraints faced by the country during the mid-20th century. Additionally, the lack of investment in large-scale water infrastructure has historically impacted the availability of potable water and agricultural irrigation, which are essential for the country's growth.

7

Indonesia

In 1961, Indonesia ranked 69th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a capacity of 32.9678 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's infrastructure development and its ability to manage water resources effectively during a period marked by significant social and economic changes.

The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including the geographical challenges of Indonesia's archipelagic nature, which consists of over 17,000 islands. Furthermore, the country's focus on agricultural development and rapid population growth during this time likely strained existing water management systems and infrastructure.

In comparison to other nations, this statistic highlights the importance of investing in water infrastructure to support both agricultural and urban needs. As Indonesia continues to develop, enhancing dam capacity remains critical for flood control, irrigation, and hydroelectric power generation, which are essential for sustainable growth and resilience against climate-related challenges.

8

El Salvador

In 1961, El Salvador ranked 114th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita. The recorded value for dam capacity was null cubic meters per inhabitant, indicating a significant lack of water storage infrastructure relative to its population size. This statistic reflects the country's limited investment in hydropower and irrigation systems during this period, which can be attributed to various socio-economic challenges, including political instability and insufficient economic resources.

The absence of substantial dam capacity per capita in El Salvador may have hindered agricultural productivity and access to clean water for its citizens. Moreover, the reliance on rainfall for agriculture, coupled with frequent natural disasters such as droughts and floods, exacerbated the challenges faced by the population. At the time, El Salvador was also undergoing significant demographic changes, with a rapidly growing population that increased the demand for water resources.

In a broader context, investments in water management and infrastructure have been crucial for many countries in the region. For instance, countries that prioritized dam construction and water resource management have often seen improvements in agricultural yields and economic stability, emphasizing the importance of such infrastructure in national development.

9

Afghanistan

In 1961, Afghanistan ranked 46th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable value of 130.235 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management and infrastructure development during a period of relative stability before the onset of prolonged conflict.

The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Afghanistan's geographical features, including significant river systems such as the Kabul and Helmand rivers, which provided opportunities for the construction of dams and irrigation systems. Furthermore, the 1950s and early 1960s saw investments in infrastructure, supported by international aid, aimed at enhancing agricultural productivity and water management.

However, the potential of this capacity was not fully realized due to subsequent decades of conflict, which severely hampered infrastructure development and maintenance. Interestingly, Afghanistan's water resources, while abundant, remain underutilized, highlighting a persistent challenge in effectively managing and distributing these resources in the face of ongoing socio-political issues.

10

Laos

In 1961, Laos ranked 129th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a reported value of null cubic meters per inhabitant. This indicates that at the time, the infrastructure for water storage and hydroelectric power generation was either extremely limited or non-existent for the population.

The absence of dam capacity can be attributed to Laos' economic status and developmental challenges during this period, as the country was recovering from the impacts of colonial rule and was not yet fully capitalizing on its abundant water resources. The rugged terrain and limited financial resources further hindered large-scale infrastructure projects.

Interestingly, Laos has since made significant strides in hydropower development, becoming known as the "Battery of Southeast Asia" due to its vast potential for hydroelectric projects, which has transformed its energy landscape in subsequent decades.

Data Source

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.

Visit Data Source

Historical Data by Year

Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.

More Geography Facts