Dam capacity per capita 1972
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Côte d'Ivoire | 4,851.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
2 | Australia | 3,377.34 cubic meters per inhabitant |
3 | Bulgaria | 415.132 cubic meters per inhabitant |
4 | Argentina | 295.026 cubic meters per inhabitant |
5 | Austria | 192.225 cubic meters per inhabitant |
6 | Afghanistan | 169.483 cubic meters per inhabitant |
7 | Albania | 165.992 cubic meters per inhabitant |
8 | Algeria | 125.164 cubic meters per inhabitant |
9 | Antigua and Barbuda | 77.706 cubic meters per inhabitant |
10 | Angola | 30.06 cubic meters per inhabitant |
11 | Armenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
12 | Azerbaijan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
13 | Bahrain | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
14 | Bangladesh | 90.409 cubic meters per inhabitant |
15 | Belarus | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
16 | Canada | 25,702.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
17 | Brazil | 4,257.91 cubic meters per inhabitant |
18 | Chile | 872.684 cubic meters per inhabitant |
19 | Botswana | 489.712 cubic meters per inhabitant |
20 | Cameroon | 383.667 cubic meters per inhabitant |
21 | Brunei Darussalam | 316.572 cubic meters per inhabitant |
22 | China | 254.024 cubic meters per inhabitant |
23 | Colombia | 218.165 cubic meters per inhabitant |
24 | Cuba | 122.547 cubic meters per inhabitant |
25 | Bolivia | 58.493 cubic meters per inhabitant |
26 | Cyprus | 44.407 cubic meters per inhabitant |
27 | Burkina Faso | 39.693 cubic meters per inhabitant |
28 | Costa Rica | 19.038 cubic meters per inhabitant |
29 | Belgium | 6.528 cubic meters per inhabitant |
30 | Congo | 5.718 cubic meters per inhabitant |
31 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 2.488 cubic meters per inhabitant |
32 | Belize | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
33 | Benin | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
34 | Bhutan | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
35 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
36 | Cabo Verde | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
37 | Cambodia | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
38 | Croatia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
39 | Czech Republic | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
40 | Egypt | 4,638.84 cubic meters per inhabitant |
41 | El Salvador | 342.88 cubic meters per inhabitant |
42 | Eswatini | 143.789 cubic meters per inhabitant |
43 | Ecuador | 31.505 cubic meters per inhabitant |
44 | Eritrea | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
45 | Estonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
46 | Ethiopia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
47 | Ghana | 15,690.4 cubic meters per inhabitant |
48 | Iraq | 12,185.8 cubic meters per inhabitant |
49 | Iceland | 5,640.45 cubic meters per inhabitant |
50 | Finland | 3,981.21 cubic meters per inhabitant |
51 | Kenya | 1,641.37 cubic meters per inhabitant |
52 | Lesotho | 791.632 cubic meters per inhabitant |
53 | Greece | 746.945 cubic meters per inhabitant |
54 | Iran | 414.986 cubic meters per inhabitant |
55 | Ireland | 286.123 cubic meters per inhabitant |
56 | Guyana | 252.225 cubic meters per inhabitant |
57 | India | 212.214 cubic meters per inhabitant |
58 | Liberia | 154.667 cubic meters per inhabitant |
59 | France | 150.333 cubic meters per inhabitant |
60 | Italy | 143.539 cubic meters per inhabitant |
61 | Japan | 98.542 cubic meters per inhabitant |
62 | Lebanon | 87.659 cubic meters per inhabitant |
63 | Haiti | 61.697 cubic meters per inhabitant |
64 | Guinea | 53.483 cubic meters per inhabitant |
65 | Indonesia | 46.313 cubic meters per inhabitant |
66 | Germany | 34.063 cubic meters per inhabitant |
67 | Honduras | 4.514 cubic meters per inhabitant |
68 | Denmark | 4.007 cubic meters per inhabitant |
69 | Jordan | 3.849 cubic meters per inhabitant |
70 | Jamaica | 2.822 cubic meters per inhabitant |
71 | Hungary | 2.68 cubic meters per inhabitant |
72 | Guatemala | 0.144 cubic meters per inhabitant |
73 | Dominican Republic | 0.095 cubic meters per inhabitant |
74 | Fiji | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
75 | Gabon | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
76 | Georgia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
77 | Grenada | 0.061 cubic meters per inhabitant |
78 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
79 | Kazakhstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
80 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
81 | Laos | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
82 | Latvia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
83 | Libya | 32.092 cubic meters per inhabitant |
84 | Lithuania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
85 | Nicaragua | 12,422.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
86 | Norway | 4,739.16 cubic meters per inhabitant |
87 | Panama | 3,647.32 cubic meters per inhabitant |
88 | New Zealand | 2,378.04 cubic meters per inhabitant |
89 | Mozambique | 2,096.71 cubic meters per inhabitant |
90 | Mexico | 1,334.14 cubic meters per inhabitant |
91 | North Korea | 1,075.18 cubic meters per inhabitant |
92 | Malaysia | 685.651 cubic meters per inhabitant |
93 | Namibia | 660.046 cubic meters per inhabitant |
94 | Portugal | 612.539 cubic meters per inhabitant |
95 | Netherlands | 483.708 cubic meters per inhabitant |
96 | Nigeria | 326.336 cubic meters per inhabitant |
97 | Morocco | 269.431 cubic meters per inhabitant |
98 | Romania | 236.233 cubic meters per inhabitant |
99 | Pakistan | 226.339 cubic meters per inhabitant |
100 | Peru | 218.223 cubic meters per inhabitant |
101 | Mongolia | 182.906 cubic meters per inhabitant |
102 | Luxembourg | 151.293 cubic meters per inhabitant |
103 | Myanmar | 82.212 cubic meters per inhabitant |
104 | Mauritius | 73.77 cubic meters per inhabitant |
105 | Madagascar | 69.753 cubic meters per inhabitant |
106 | Mali | 26.991 cubic meters per inhabitant |
107 | Malawi | 8.566 cubic meters per inhabitant |
108 | Maldives | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
109 | Malta | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
110 | Mauritania | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
111 | Montenegro | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
112 | Saint Lucia | 24.528 cubic meters per inhabitant |
113 | Niger | 4.561 cubic meters per inhabitant |
114 | Nepal | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
115 | North Macedonia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
116 | Oman | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
117 | Poland | 56.961 cubic meters per inhabitant |
118 | Philippines | 40.6 cubic meters per inhabitant |
119 | Papua New Guinea | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
120 | Paraguay | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
121 | Republic of Moldova | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
122 | Russia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
123 | Rwanda | 0 cubic meters per inhabitant |
124 | Samoa | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
125 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
126 | Saudi Arabia | 13.058 cubic meters per inhabitant |
127 | Senegal | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
128 | Serbia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
129 | Seychelles | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
130 | Suriname | 50,325.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
131 | Zambia | 21,055.3 cubic meters per inhabitant |
132 | Zimbabwe | 17,560.5 cubic meters per inhabitant |
133 | Uganda | 7,349.03 cubic meters per inhabitant |
134 | Tanzania | 6,966.62 cubic meters per inhabitant |
135 | Uruguay | 4,024.66 cubic meters per inhabitant |
136 | Sweden | 3,983.08 cubic meters per inhabitant |
137 | United States | 3,027.69 cubic meters per inhabitant |
138 | Spain | 1,081.16 cubic meters per inhabitant |
139 | Thailand | 1,027.47 cubic meters per inhabitant |
140 | Vietnam | 584.271 cubic meters per inhabitant |
141 | Venezuela | 504.729 cubic meters per inhabitant |
142 | Switzerland | 497.757 cubic meters per inhabitant |
143 | Turkey | 379.129 cubic meters per inhabitant |
144 | Sri Lanka | 328.191 cubic meters per inhabitant |
145 | Tunisia | 126.116 cubic meters per inhabitant |
146 | United Kingdom | 81.681 cubic meters per inhabitant |
147 | Sierra Leone | 78.17 cubic meters per inhabitant |
148 | Singapore | 12.752 cubic meters per inhabitant |
149 | Slovakia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
150 | Slovenia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
151 | Somalia | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
152 | South Africa | 462.334 cubic meters per inhabitant |
153 | South Korea | 76.174 cubic meters per inhabitant |
154 | State of Palestine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
155 | Sudan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
156 | Syrian Arab Republic | 50.971 cubic meters per inhabitant |
157 | Tajikistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
158 | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.504 cubic meters per inhabitant |
159 | Togo | 3.132 cubic meters per inhabitant |
160 | Turkmenistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
161 | Ukraine | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
162 | United Arab Emirates | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
163 | Uzbekistan | NaN cubic meters per inhabitant |
164 | Yemen | 0.702 cubic meters per inhabitant |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Côte d'Ivoire
- #2
Australia
- #3
Bulgaria
- #4
Argentina
- #5
Austria
- #6
Afghanistan
- #7
Albania
- #8
Algeria
- #9
Antigua and Barbuda
- #10
Angola
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #164
Yemen
- #163
Uzbekistan
- #162
United Arab Emirates
- #161
Ukraine
- #160
Turkmenistan
- #159
Togo
- #158
Trinidad and Tobago
- #157
Tajikistan
- #156
Syrian Arab Republic
- #155
Sudan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The metric of dam capacity per capita provides a crucial measure of a nation’s water resource availability relative to its population. Expressed in cubic meters per inhabitant, this figure from 1972 sheds light on how countries manage water resources to support sustainable development, agriculture, industry, and community needs. Understanding these data patterns is essential for addressing water security challenges and planning for future demands.
Global Overview of Dam Capacity in 1972
In 1972, a total of 121 countries reported data on dam capacity per capita. The average value stood at 2,001.85 cubic meters per inhabitant, with a median of 165.99. This significant disparity highlights the uneven distribution of water resources across the globe. Suriname led the rankings with a staggering 50,325.5 cubic meters per inhabitant, underscoring its extensive water storage facilities relative to its small population. In stark contrast, countries such as Bhutan, Papua New Guinea, and Cambodia reported no measurable dam capacity, reflecting either the absence of large-scale water storage infrastructure or alternative water management strategies.
Regional Disparities and Influences
Examining the data from a regional perspective reveals distinct patterns influenced by geographical and climatic factors. Countries with abundant rainfall and large river systems, such as Suriname and Canada, naturally tend to have higher dam capacities. Conversely, nations with dryer climates or smaller land areas often struggle to develop similar infrastructures. For instance, landlocked countries like Bhutan and Nepal, despite their rich water resources in the form of rivers, lack extensive dam infrastructures, resulting in a dam capacity per capita of zero. These disparities highlight the critical role of geographical features and climate in shaping water management strategies.
Economic and Developmental Implications
Dam capacity per capita is intricately linked to a country's economic development and agricultural productivity. Nations with higher storage capacities, such as Zambia and Zimbabwe, benefit from the ability to regulate water supply for agricultural and industrial activities, thus supporting economic stability and growth. In Zambia, for instance, a capacity of 21,055.3 cubic meters per inhabitant underlines the nation's potential to harness hydropower and sustain irrigation-dependent agriculture. On the other hand, the absence of significant water storage infrastructure in countries like Rwanda and Cambodia can hinder agricultural expansion and economic development, necessitating investments in water management technologies to boost productivity and resilience against climate variability.
Policy and Sustainability Trends
The year 1972 marked a pivotal period for environmental policy development globally, influencing how countries approached dam construction and water management. The growing awareness of environmental impacts led to more sustainable practices, balancing the need for large-scale water storage with ecological preservation. Countries like Sweden and Norway, which recorded increases in dam capacity, reflect a strategic expansion aimed at improving water management while adhering to environmental regulations. However, the slight decreases in dam capacity in countries like Suriname and Zambia, despite their existing infrastructure, indicate possible shifts in policy focus towards maintaining ecological integrity and adapting to changing environmental conditions.
Year-over-Year Variations and Trends
Analyzing the year-over-year changes in dam capacity per capita reveals intriguing trends. On average, there was a change of 29.82 cubic meters per inhabitant, a 34.6% increase, reflecting global efforts to enhance water storage capabilities. Côte d'Ivoire, for instance, experienced a remarkable surge of 4675.24 cubic meters per inhabitant, translating to a 2649.6% increase, largely due to intensified investments in dam construction projects. Conversely, countries like Suriname and Zambia saw declines in capacity, suggesting possible reductions in water levels or adjustments in water management practices. These variations underscore the dynamic nature of water resource management and the influence of both human and environmental factors on dam capacity metrics.
In conclusion, the 1972 data on dam capacity per capita provides valuable insights into the global water resource landscape. This metric not only illuminates the disparities and developmental challenges faced by countries but also highlights the importance of sustainable water management practices in fostering economic growth and ensuring water security. As nations continue to navigate the complexities of climate change and resource allocation, the lessons from past data remain crucial for informing future policies and strategies.
Insights by country
Egypt
In 1972, Egypt ranked 13th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive capacity of 4638.84 cubic meters per inhabitant. This significant figure reflects the country's extensive investment in hydraulic infrastructure, particularly the construction of the Aswan High Dam, which was completed in 1970 and plays a crucial role in water management and agricultural irrigation.
The high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Egypt's strategic geographic and economic needs, as the Nile River serves as the primary water source for the nation. The dam not only facilitates flood control but also enhances agricultural productivity, which is vital for a country where agriculture employs a large portion of the population and is critical for food security.
Additionally, the focus on dam construction during this period illustrates Egypt's commitment to harnessing its natural resources to support its growing population and industrial ambitions. The management of water resources remains a central issue for Egypt, given the challenges posed by climate change and regional water politics.
Indonesia
In 1972, Indonesia ranked 85th out of 164 countries based on dam capacity per capita, with a value of 46.3128 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's water resource management and infrastructure development during a period of significant economic and population growth.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to various factors, including Indonesia's geographical diversity, rapid urbanization, and the challenges of managing water resources across its thousands of islands. Additionally, investments in infrastructure were still developing, as the country was in the early stages of its industrialization process.
Notably, the capacity of dams is crucial for irrigation, flood control, and hydroelectric power generation, which are vital for sustaining Indonesia's agricultural economy and energy needs. As a comparison, higher dam capacity per capita in other countries often correlates with more advanced water management systems and infrastructure investments.
Haiti
In 1972, Haiti ranked 80th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a figure of 61.6967 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's limited infrastructure and challenges in water resource management, which are critical for both agriculture and drinking water supply.
The relatively low dam capacity per capita can be attributed to several factors, including political instability, economic challenges, and natural disasters that have historically plagued the nation. Additionally, the lack of investment in large-scale water management projects has hindered the development of necessary infrastructure.
Despite these challenges, it is noteworthy that Haiti’s water resource potential remains significant, and improvements in dam capacity could have far-reaching implications for the country’s agricultural productivity and access to clean water in the future.
Iraq
In 1972, Iraq ranked 7th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 12,185.8 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high capacity reflects the country's significant investment in water management infrastructure, particularly in the context of its two major rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates, which provide essential water resources for agriculture and domestic use.
The substantial dam capacity is indicative of Iraq's strategic focus on harnessing its water resources to support its agricultural sector and growing population during a period of relative political stability and economic growth. Factors contributing to this capacity include the construction of large-scale dams and irrigation projects, which aimed to improve water distribution and increase agricultural productivity.
Moreover, the high dam capacity per capita can also be seen as a response to the environmental challenges faced by the region, including droughts and fluctuating rainfall patterns. This statistic underscores Iraq's historical reliance on water management systems to sustain its economy and the livelihoods of its citizens.
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone ranked 75th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita in 1972, with a notable capacity of 78.1697 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's ability to harness and store water resources, which is crucial for agriculture, hydroelectric power generation, and domestic water supply.
The relatively significant dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Sierra Leone's abundant water resources, including numerous rivers and streams that traverse the country. However, infrastructure development has historically faced challenges due to political instability and economic constraints, which may have impacted the effective utilization of this capacity.
Additionally, Sierra Leone's reliance on dam infrastructure has implications for its agricultural productivity and energy supply, underscoring the importance of water management in the context of sustainable development. As a region rich in natural resources, maximizing dam capacity could play a critical role in the nation's long-term economic growth and resilience.
Botswana
In 1972, Botswana ranked 37th out of 164 countries regarding dam capacity per capita, with a significant value of 489.712 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage its water resources effectively amidst a predominantly arid environment.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Botswana's commitment to developing its water infrastructure to support agriculture, domestic needs, and emerging industries. The construction of dams and water reservoirs has been essential in mitigating the impacts of droughts and ensuring water availability for its growing population.
Furthermore, it is noteworthy that Botswana's strategic investments in water management during this period laid the groundwork for sustainable development and resilience against climate variability, which remains crucial for the country's socio-economic stability.
Antigua and Barbuda
In 1972, Antigua and Barbuda ranked 76th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 77.7064 cubic meters per inhabitant. This statistic reflects the country's efforts to manage its water resources effectively, particularly in an era when water conservation became increasingly important due to rising populations and tourism demands.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to the country's geographical features, which include a number of rivers and streams, making it feasible to develop water storage infrastructure. Additionally, the tourism industry, which is vital to the economy, necessitates reliable water supply management, influencing investments in dam capacity and related infrastructure.
It is also noteworthy that, despite its small size, Antigua and Barbuda has focused on sustainable development, highlighting the significance of water resource management in the context of climate change and environmental sustainability. As a small island developing state, the country continues to face challenges associated with water scarcity and the impacts of climate variability.
Brunei Darussalam
In 1972, Brunei Darussalam ranked 47th out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, boasting an impressive 316.572 cubic meters per inhabitant. This high level of dam capacity reflects the country's significant investment in water infrastructure, which is essential for managing its freshwater resources.
The substantial dam capacity can be attributed to Brunei's abundance of rainfall and its commitment to sustainable water management practices. The government has prioritized the development of water storage facilities to ensure a reliable supply of water for both domestic use and agricultural needs, crucial for a country that relies heavily on its natural resources.
Additionally, Brunei's wealth, largely derived from its oil and gas sector, has enabled the country to channel resources into public utilities, including water management systems. This investment not only supports the local population but also positions Brunei favorably in terms of water security compared to many other countries in the region.
Luxembourg
In 1972, Luxembourg ranked 63rd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 151.293 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country’s significant investment in water infrastructure and its emphasis on resource management, given its small size and high population density.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Luxembourg's strategic geographic location, which allows for the harnessing of water resources from surrounding rivers and streams. Additionally, the country's strong economic position during this period facilitated funding for infrastructure projects, including dams, to support both residential and industrial water needs.
Further contextualizing this statistic, Luxembourg has historically prioritized sustainable water management practices, which contribute to its ability to maintain a high dam capacity. Comparatively, other countries with similar economic profiles often invest similarly in infrastructure, leading to higher per capita figures in this regard.
Liberia
In 1972, Liberia ranked 62nd out of 164 countries in terms of dam capacity per capita, with a notable capacity of 154.667 cubic meters per inhabitant. This figure reflects the country's investment in hydroelectric infrastructure and its reliance on water resources for energy generation and irrigation.
The relatively high dam capacity per capita can be attributed to Liberia's abundant natural water resources, including rivers and rainfall that create opportunities for hydroelectric power. Additionally, the government and international partners have historically invested in the development of water infrastructure, which has supported agricultural and industrial activities.
It is important to note that while dam capacity indicates potential for energy generation and water management, the actual utilization and maintenance of these facilities can vary significantly. In Liberia's case, the impacts of civil conflict and governance challenges in subsequent decades have affected the sustainability and effectiveness of its water management systems.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Dam capacity per capita data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Geography Facts
Percentage of land area by degree of urbanization
Explore the percentage of land area by degree of urbanization, highlighting how urban development shapes countries' landscapes and influences economic growth. Understanding this statistic reveals the balance between urban and rural spaces, essential for sustainable planning.
View dataBrowse All Geography
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data