Dam capacity per capita in Tajikistan (1961 - 2026)
Dam capacity per capita measures the amount of water storage available for each individual in a country, expressed in cubic meters. This statistic highlights water resource management and its impact on sustainability and development. Understanding dam capacity is crucial for addressing water security and supporting agriculture, industry, and communities.
Dam capacity per capita over timeSome values are estimated based on historical trends
| Year | Value | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.62K cubic meters per inhabitant | 68.05 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.53% |
| 2025 | 2.69K cubic meters per inhabitant | 68.05 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.47% |
| 2024 | 2.76K cubic meters per inhabitant | 68.05 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.41% |
| 2023 | 2.83K cubic meters per inhabitant | 71.75 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.48% |
| 2022 | 2.90K cubic meters per inhabitant | 62.6 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.11% |
| 2021 | 2.96K cubic meters per inhabitant | 66.07 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.18% |
| 2020 | 3.03K cubic meters per inhabitant | 69.65 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.25% |
| 2019 | 3.10K cubic meters per inhabitant | 74.06 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.34% |
| 2018 | 3.17K cubic meters per inhabitant | 77.24 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.38% |
| 2017 | 3.25K cubic meters per inhabitant | 80.7 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.42% |
| 2016 | 3.33K cubic meters per inhabitant | 85.39 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.50% |
| 2015 | 3.41K cubic meters per inhabitant | 88.44 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.53% |
| 2014 | 3.50K cubic meters per inhabitant | 89 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.48% |
| 2013 | 3.59K cubic meters per inhabitant | 90.79 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.47% |
| 2012 | 3.68K cubic meters per inhabitant | 89.07 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.36% |
| 2011 | 3.77K cubic meters per inhabitant | 84.42 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.19% |
| 2010 | 3.86K cubic meters per inhabitant | 15.91 cubic meters per inhabitant | -0.41% |
| 2009 | 3.87K cubic meters per inhabitant | 76.69 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.94% |
| 2008 | 3.95K cubic meters per inhabitant | 78.97 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.96% |
| 2007 | 4.03K cubic meters per inhabitant | 78.11 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.90% |
| 2006 | 4.10K cubic meters per inhabitant | 78.75 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.88% |
| 2005 | 4.18K cubic meters per inhabitant | 82.66 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.94% |
| 2004 | 4.27K cubic meters per inhabitant | 84.56 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.94% |
| 2003 | 4.35K cubic meters per inhabitant | 84.53 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.91% |
| 2002 | 4.44K cubic meters per inhabitant | 86.04 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.90% |
| 2001 | 4.52K cubic meters per inhabitant | 88.23 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.91% |
| 2000 | 4.61K cubic meters per inhabitant | 56.7 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.22% |
| 1999 | 4.67K cubic meters per inhabitant | 24.16 cubic meters per inhabitant | -0.52% |
| 1998 | 4.69K cubic meters per inhabitant | 27.93 cubic meters per inhabitant | -0.59% |
| 1997 | 4.72K cubic meters per inhabitant | 57.02 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.19% |
| 1996 | 4.78K cubic meters per inhabitant | 94.68 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.94% |
| 1995 | 4.87K cubic meters per inhabitant | 103.01 cubic meters per inhabitant | -2.07% |
| 1994 | 4.97K cubic meters per inhabitant | +2.34K cubic meters per inhabitant | +88.56% |
| 1993 | 2.64K cubic meters per inhabitant | 35.29 cubic meters per inhabitant | -1.32% |
| 1992 | 2.67K cubic meters per inhabitant | — | — |
| 1991 | — | — | — |
| 1990 | — | — | — |
| 1989 | — | — | — |
| 1988 | — | — | — |
| 1987 | — | — | — |
| 1986 | — | — | — |
| 1985 | — | — | — |
| 1984 | — | — | — |
| 1983 | — | — | — |
| 1982 | — | — | — |
| 1981 | — | — | — |
| 1980 | — | — | — |
| 1979 | — | — | — |
| 1978 | — | — | — |
| 1977 | — | — | — |
| 1976 | — | — | — |
| 1975 | — | — | — |
| 1974 | — | — | — |
| 1973 | — | — | — |
| 1972 | — | — | — |
| 1971 | — | — | — |
| 1970 | — | — | — |
| 1969 | — | — | — |
| 1968 | — | — | — |
| 1967 | — | — | — |
| 1966 | — | — | — |
| 1965 | — | — | — |
| 1964 | — | — | — |
| 1963 | — | — | — |
| 1962 | — | — | — |
| 1961 | — | — | — |
Explore additional statistical insights
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country in Tajikistan
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Currently married (Percent) in Tajikistan
The percentage of currently married individuals by country highlights societal trends in family structure and relationships. Understanding these statistics can provide insights into cultural norms and demographic shifts, influencing policies and social programs.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars in Tajikistan
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
Human Capital Index in Tajikistan
The Human Capital Index measures a country's investment in education and health, reflecting its potential for economic growth and productivity. This vital statistic highlights the importance of nurturing human resources for sustainable development.
Life expectancy at birth in Tajikistan
Life expectancy at birth measures the average years a newborn is expected to live, reflecting a country's health standards and quality of life. This vital statistic highlights disparities in healthcare and living conditions across nations, making it essential for global health assessments.
Median age of population in Tajikistan
The median age of a population is a key demographic indicator, reflecting the age distribution within a country. Understanding median age helps assess economic development, healthcare needs, and social dynamics. Countries with a higher median age may face challenges related to aging populations, while younger populations often indicate growth potential.