Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country 1973
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | China | 46,023,557,260 $ |
2 | Brazil | 7,921,716,757 $ |
3 | Australia | 6,952,639,940 $ |
4 | Canada | 6,401,900,258 $ |
5 | Argentina | 4,371,043,938 $ |
6 | Bangladesh | 2,764,452,721 $ |
7 | Colombia | 2,378,503,725 $ |
8 | Bulgaria | 2,036,047,661 $ |
9 | Belgium | 1,900,337,317 $ |
10 | Austria | 1,729,933,786 $ |
11 | Denmark | 1,621,456,319 $ |
12 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 1,293,413,174 $ |
13 | Cuba | 1,116,951,726 $ |
14 | Algeria | 957,231,511.3 $ |
15 | Albania | 941,147,591.8 $ |
16 | Chile | 872,540,016.7 $ |
17 | Afghanistan | 870,871,218 $ |
18 | Côte d'Ivoire | 714,139,635.8 $ |
19 | Angola | 693,463,737.1 $ |
20 | Cameroon | 532,788,303.5 $ |
21 | Cambodia | 307,544,366.4 $ |
22 | Costa Rica | 272,113,271.5 $ |
23 | Bolivia | 249,875,062.5 $ |
24 | Burundi | 188,066,182.6 $ |
25 | Burkina Faso | 187,706,768.7 $ |
26 | Chad | 166,255,907.1 $ |
27 | Cyprus | 125,167,671.8 $ |
28 | Central African Republic | 119,773,459.1 $ |
29 | Congo | 114,279,306.6 $ |
30 | Botswana | 66,707,052.19 $ |
31 | Bhutan | 33,731,955.98 $ |
32 | Antigua and Barbuda | 3,040,443.3 $ |
33 | Armenia | NaN $ |
34 | Azerbaijan | NaN $ |
35 | Benin | 153,710,513.4 $ |
36 | Barbados | 23,062,655.35 $ |
37 | Bahamas | 19,460,236 $ |
38 | Belize | 14,606,645.37 $ |
39 | Bahrain | 6,655,281.024 $ |
40 | Belarus | NaN $ |
41 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN $ |
42 | Cabo Verde | 20,683,112.05 $ |
43 | Comoros | 15,575,401.76 $ |
44 | Cook Islands | 3,278,689.257 $ |
45 | Brunei Darussalam | 2,171,016.094 $ |
46 | Croatia | NaN $ |
47 | Czech Republic | NaN $ |
48 | India | 36,087,353,867 $ |
49 | Japan | 23,198,982,954 $ |
50 | France | 18,006,196,125 $ |
51 | Italy | 13,193,529,589 $ |
52 | Germany | 10,366,293,518 $ |
53 | Indonesia | 6,306,710,186 $ |
54 | Greece | 2,715,257,072 $ |
55 | Iran | 2,672,441,937 $ |
56 | Egypt | 2,620,044,193 $ |
57 | Finland | 1,841,131,977 $ |
58 | Hungary | 1,659,476,530 $ |
59 | Ghana | 1,573,263,031 $ |
60 | Ireland | 1,143,492,704 $ |
61 | Ecuador | 987,079,000 $ |
62 | Kenya | 809,958,605.1 $ |
63 | Iraq | 661,088,601.7 $ |
64 | Israel | 544,993,490.1 $ |
65 | Dominican Republic | 486,967,020 $ |
66 | Guatemala | 378,538,602 $ |
67 | El Salvador | 312,253,332 $ |
68 | Honduras | 312,148,741.4 $ |
69 | Haiti | 254,717,717.4 $ |
70 | Guinea | 189,241,446.8 $ |
71 | Gambia | 179,972,525.6 $ |
72 | Guinea-Bissau | 172,290,628.6 $ |
73 | Jamaica | 148,994,684.8 $ |
74 | Lebanon | 139,931,283 $ |
75 | Iceland | 115,819,671.7 $ |
76 | Fiji | 98,754,176.73 $ |
77 | Gabon | 77,819,604.24 $ |
78 | Laos | 67,233,961.14 $ |
79 | Eswatini | 61,917,391.27 $ |
80 | Jordan | 55,854,181.82 $ |
81 | Guyana | 51,914,223.25 $ |
82 | Kuwait | 13,487,435.58 $ |
83 | Dominica | 12,330,932.42 $ |
84 | Grenada | 6,475,437.647 $ |
85 | Djibouti | 4,981,912.918 $ |
86 | Equatorial Guinea | 3,756,185.439 $ |
87 | Eritrea | NaN $ |
88 | Estonia | NaN $ |
89 | Ethiopia | NaN $ |
90 | Georgia | NaN $ |
91 | Kazakhstan | NaN $ |
92 | Kiribati | 4,509,788.777 $ |
93 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN $ |
94 | Latvia | NaN $ |
95 | Nigeria | 8,142,570,935 $ |
96 | Mexico | 7,084,776,376 $ |
97 | Poland | 5,563,606,867 $ |
98 | Portugal | 3,531,663,917 $ |
99 | Netherlands | 3,359,442,028 $ |
100 | Pakistan | 3,163,406,948 $ |
101 | Philippines | 3,104,085,500 $ |
102 | Romania | 3,067,128,276 $ |
103 | Malaysia | 2,184,723,617 $ |
104 | Mozambique | 1,949,474,570 $ |
105 | North Korea | 1,874,188,914 $ |
106 | New Zealand | 1,486,131,895 $ |
107 | Myanmar | 1,436,529,005 $ |
108 | Peru | 1,421,188,631 $ |
109 | Morocco | 1,420,755,892 $ |
110 | Norway | 1,001,763,261 $ |
111 | Nepal | 743,830,695.7 $ |
112 | Madagascar | 556,009,945.2 $ |
113 | Malawi | 486,628,102.3 $ |
114 | Papua New Guinea | 394,800,338.2 $ |
115 | Mali | 380,385,306.8 $ |
116 | Niger | 362,776,806.2 $ |
117 | Paraguay | 235,831,612 $ |
118 | Nicaragua | 233,667,565.3 $ |
119 | Rwanda | 231,054,435.1 $ |
120 | Libya | 218,402,612.5 $ |
121 | Mauritania | 192,268,516.5 $ |
122 | Panama | 169,920,274 $ |
123 | Mauritius | 90,771,018.19 $ |
124 | Luxembourg | 70,886,555.86 $ |
125 | Liberia | 58,549,651 $ |
126 | Lesotho | 34,209,844.74 $ |
127 | Lithuania | NaN $ |
128 | Namibia | 71,657,765.35 $ |
129 | Mongolia | 25,328,671.23 $ |
130 | Malta | 21,047,082.59 $ |
131 | Maldives | 12,621,285.53 $ |
132 | Montenegro | NaN $ |
133 | Nauru | 1,536,607.909 $ |
134 | North Macedonia | NaN $ |
135 | Oman | 51,557,299.21 $ |
136 | Republic of Moldova | NaN $ |
137 | Qatar | 10,783,127.03 $ |
138 | Russia | NaN $ |
139 | United States | 45,962,211,795 $ |
140 | Turkey | 8,583,109,541 $ |
141 | Spain | 7,232,931,913 $ |
142 | United Kingdom | 4,295,155,067 $ |
143 | Sweden | 3,538,349,096 $ |
144 | South Korea | 3,414,576,996 $ |
145 | Thailand | 3,130,138,793 $ |
146 | South Africa | 1,988,686,656 $ |
147 | Vietnam | 1,431,572,616 $ |
148 | Switzerland | 1,135,697,599 $ |
149 | Venezuela | 930,232,558.1 $ |
150 | Uganda | 867,130,493.1 $ |
151 | Sri Lanka | 802,518,701.1 $ |
152 | Uruguay | 677,179,531.8 $ |
153 | Tanzania | 515,156,864 $ |
154 | Tunisia | 503,581,426.7 $ |
155 | Zimbabwe | 463,960,906 $ |
156 | Syrian Arab Republic | 430,512,820.5 $ |
157 | Senegal | 338,882,213.1 $ |
158 | Saudi Arabia | 327,825,551.7 $ |
159 | Somalia | 232,637,762.4 $ |
160 | Zambia | 216,300,921.6 $ |
161 | Sierra Leone | 166,391,115 $ |
162 | Togo | 125,242,215.2 $ |
163 | Trinidad and Tobago | 98,630,096.16 $ |
164 | Singapore | 96,729,561.49 $ |
165 | State of Palestine | 45,951,217 $ |
166 | Suriname | 31,522,128.85 $ |
167 | Solomon Islands | 23,377,595.32 $ |
168 | Samoa | 18,721,771.47 $ |
169 | Sao Tome and Principe | 14,706,243.07 $ |
170 | Serbia | NaN $ |
171 | Tonga | 14,013,707 $ |
172 | Seychelles | 3,676,452.838 $ |
173 | Slovakia | NaN $ |
174 | Slovenia | NaN $ |
175 | South Sudan | NaN $ |
176 | Sudan | NaN $ |
177 | Tajikistan | NaN $ |
178 | Timor-Leste | NaN $ |
179 | Turkmenistan | NaN $ |
180 | United Arab Emirates | 20,922,710.56 $ |
181 | Tuvalu | 549,543.131 $ |
182 | Ukraine | NaN $ |
183 | Uzbekistan | NaN $ |
184 | Vanuatu | 19,938,692.79 $ |
185 | Saint Lucia | 6,314,933.915 $ |
186 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 4,399,595.942 $ |
187 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 3,841,696.152 $ |
188 | Yemen | NaN $ |
↑Top 10 Countries
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #188
Yemen
- #187
Saint Kitts and Nevis
- #186
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- #185
Saint Lucia
- #184
Vanuatu
- #183
Uzbekistan
- #182
Ukraine
- #181
Tuvalu
- #180
United Arab Emirates
- #179
Turkmenistan
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country in 1973 provides an intriguing lens through which to examine the global economic landscape. As a critical measure of how much agriculture contributes to national economies, this statistic not only highlights the importance of the farming sector in various countries but also informs potential investment and policy decisions. Understanding these dynamics is crucial, given the era's economic and political climates, which were marked by significant shifts, including oil crises and changing trade patterns.
Global Economic Context of 1973
In 1973, the world was still experiencing rapid post-war economic growth, although it was about to encounter the oil crisis that would reshape many economic priorities. The era was characterized by increasing globalization, where countries were increasingly interconnected through trade. Against this backdrop, agriculture remained a bedrock for many nations, especially those in the developing world. The data highlights that China and the United States led in terms of agriculture value added, with figures reaching $46,023,557,260 and $45,962,211,795, respectively. This dominance underscores the vast agricultural output and technological advancements present in these nations, which were set against the backdrop of industrial expansion and modernization.
Regional Dynamics and Agricultural Contributions
Analyzing the agriculture value added across different regions reveals distinct patterns. In Asia, countries like China and India were major players, with India's agriculture sector contributing $36,087,353,867 to its GDP. This reflects the immense scale of agricultural activities and the reliance on this sector for economic stability and employment. In contrast, smaller island nations such as Tuvalu and Nauru reported much lower values, $549,543.13 and $1,536,607.91 respectively, highlighting the limited scope of agricultural activities and different economic structures in these regions. The European landscape featured significant contributions from France and Italy, with value additions of $18,006,196,125 and $13,193,529,589, indicating diverse agricultural outputs ranging from crops to livestock.
Development, Industrialization, and Agriculture
The relationship between industrialization and agriculture is pivotal in understanding the economic transformations of 1973. Developed nations such as Japan and Germany showed substantial agricultural value additions, with $23,198,982,954 and $10,366,293,518 respectively. These figures illustrate the balance between industrial growth and agricultural sustainability, a hallmark of developed economies. Meanwhile, emerging economies like Brazil and Nigeria, with contributions of $7,921,716,757 and $8,142,570,935, were navigating the complex interplay of development pressures and agricultural dependency. These countries were beginning to see shifts in labor from agriculture to industry, a change driven by both internal policy shifts and global economic forces.
Year-over-Year Changes and Economic Implications
The year 1973 also saw notable changes in the agriculture value added as a share of GDP, reflecting broader economic trends. The United States experienced a significant increase of $14,688,103,590 compared to the previous year, a 47% surge attributed to both technological advancements in agriculture and policy support for farming sectors. Similarly, China and India saw increases of $8,839,811,011 and $8,169,702,587, enhancing their agricultural productivity and reinforcing their status as agricultural powerhouses. Conversely, some countries faced declines, such as Malawi and the Syrian Arab Republic, with reductions of -$178,870,619.90 and -$164,615,384.60, underlining challenges such as political instability and adverse weather conditions affecting agricultural yields.
Policy Implications and Future Directions
In 1973, agricultural policy was at a crossroads, as nations grappled with the need to sustain growth while addressing emerging challenges. The data highlights the necessity for countries to adopt policies that balance agricultural expansion with technological integration and environmental sustainability. For instance, investments in agricultural research and infrastructure were key to unlocking increased productivity, particularly in developing regions. Furthermore, the economic importance of agriculture in GDP emphasized the need for supportive trade policies that would enhance access to international markets. As global trends continue to evolve, understanding the historical context of agricultural contributions to GDP assists in shaping future economic strategies and ensuring food security and economic resilience worldwide.
Insights by country
Solomon Islands
In 1973, the Solomon Islands ranked 130 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The agriculture sector contributed approximately $23,377,595.32 to the national economy, reflecting the importance of agriculture in the livelihood of its citizens.
This statistic highlights the reliance of the Solomon Islands on agriculture, particularly in rural areas where farming is a primary source of income and sustenance. Factors contributing to this reliance include the country's geographic isolation, limited industrial development, and a subsistence-based economy that is heavily dependent on the cultivation of crops such as coconuts, cocoa, and palm oil.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that the agricultural sector has historically faced challenges such as vulnerability to climate change, natural disasters, and fluctuating global commodity prices, which can significantly impact its overall contribution to GDP.
Mauritania
Mauritania ranked 94th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP for the year 1973. The agriculture value added amounted to $192,268,516.5, indicating the sector's significant contribution to the national economy during that time.
This statistic reflects the reliance of Mauritania on agriculture, which was a crucial part of its economic framework. The country’s agrarian sector faced various challenges, including harsh climatic conditions and limited arable land, which constrained agricultural productivity and development.
In the 1970s, Mauritania was also grappling with economic transitions and the impacts of colonial legacy, which influenced agricultural practices and land ownership. Additionally, external factors such as global commodity prices and regional trade dynamics played a role in shaping the agricultural landscape of the nation.
Lesotho
In 1973, Lesotho ranked 126th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The total value for this statistic was approximately $34,209,844.74, reflecting the significant role that agriculture played in the national economy during that period.
This reliance on agriculture is rooted in Lesotho's geographic and climatic conditions, which limit the diversity of crops that can be cultivated. A large portion of the population engaged in subsistence farming, which was essential for food security but also made the economy vulnerable to climatic variations and market fluctuations.
Additionally, the agricultural sector in Lesotho faced challenges such as limited access to technology, insufficient infrastructure, and high levels of poverty, which hindered productivity. Despite these challenges, agriculture remained a vital source of employment and income for the majority of the rural population.
Ethiopia
In 1973, Ethiopia ranked 168 out of 188 countries regarding agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this metric was null $, indicating a lack of reported data or possibly negligible contributions from the agricultural sector at that time.
This ranking reflects Ethiopia's predominantly agrarian economy, where a significant portion of the population relied on subsistence farming. Factors contributing to this low agricultural value added included frequent droughts, outdated farming techniques, and limited access to markets, which hindered agricultural productivity and economic growth.
Additionally, during the early 1970s, Ethiopia was undergoing political changes that would later affect agricultural policies and land ownership, further complicating the economic landscape. It is noteworthy that despite challenges, agriculture has historically been a crucial component of Ethiopia's economy, employing a large percentage of the workforce and providing food security.
Brunei Darussalam
In 1973, Brunei Darussalam ranked 157th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The agriculture sector contributed approximately $2,171,016.094 to the nation's gross domestic product during this period. This relatively low ranking reflects Brunei's economic structure, which is heavily reliant on oil and gas revenues, overshadowing traditional agricultural activities.
The limited contribution of agriculture to the GDP can be attributed to Brunei's small land area and the dominance of the hydrocarbon sector, which has historically provided substantial economic growth and development. As a result, investment in agriculture has been minimal, leading to a focus on importing food and other agricultural products to meet domestic needs.
Additionally, Brunei's government has consistently prioritized the oil and gas industry, resulting in less emphasis on diversifying the economy through agricultural development. Despite this, there are ongoing discussions aimed at enhancing food security and self-sufficiency in agricultural production, indicating a potential shift in policy focus in subsequent years.
Timor-Leste
In 1973, Timor-Leste ranked 184th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The country recorded a value of null, indicating that agricultural contributions to the economy were either not measured or were negligible during this period.
This statistic reflects the historical context of Timor-Leste, which was under Portuguese colonial rule until 1975. The agricultural sector, primarily subsistence farming, faced significant challenges due to limited infrastructure and investment, which hampered its development. Additionally, the socio-political climate and lack of economic diversification further suppressed agricultural productivity.
As a result, the economy of Timor-Leste was heavily reliant on other sectors, with agriculture struggling to emerge as a significant contributor to GDP. The country's post-colonial struggles and subsequent conflicts have continued to shape its agricultural landscape and economic trajectory.
Belgium
In 1973, Belgium ranked 36th out of 188 countries regarding agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with a recorded value of $1,900,337,317. This statistic reflects the importance of the agricultural sector within Belgium's economy during this period, contributing significantly to the national income.
The relatively high ranking can be attributed to Belgium's diverse agricultural production, which includes crops like sugar beets, wheat, and potatoes, as well as a robust livestock sector. Additionally, Belgium's advanced agricultural practices and well-developed infrastructure facilitated increased productivity and value generation in agriculture.
It is also noteworthy that during the early 1970s, the European Economic Community (EEC), which Belgium was a founding member of, began to shape agricultural policies that aimed to stabilize food production and prices, further influencing the agricultural sector's performance in the country.
Ukraine
In 1973, Ukraine held the 186th position out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with a reported value of null $. This indicates a negligible contribution of the agriculture sector to the overall economy during this period.
The low ranking and value can be attributed to several factors, including the economic structure of Ukraine at the time, which was heavily influenced by its status as a Soviet republic. Industrialization efforts prioritized heavy industry over agriculture, leading to a significant underinvestment in agricultural sectors.
Additionally, this period was marked by political and economic challenges, including centralized planning and inefficiencies that often hampered agricultural productivity. Despite its fertile lands, Ukraine's agricultural potential was not fully realized, leading to its low output relative to GDP.
Turkey
In 1973, Turkey ranked 8th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, totaling approximately $8,583,109,541. This significant contribution of agriculture to the national economy highlights the sector's importance during this period, reflecting Turkey's agrarian roots and reliance on agricultural production.
The high share of agriculture in Turkey's GDP can be attributed to several factors, including a large rural population engaged in farming, favorable climatic conditions for diverse crop production, and the historical significance of agriculture in Turkey's economic development. During the early 1970s, agriculture was a primary source of employment and income for many Turkish families, which further solidified its role in the economy.
Additionally, Turkey's agricultural landscape was characterized by traditional farming practices and subsistence agriculture, which underscored the sector's importance in food security and local economies. Interesting to note, Turkey is known for its diverse agricultural products, including fruits, vegetables, and grains, which have contributed to its status as a key player in the agricultural market of the region.
Armenia
In 1973, Armenia ranked 160th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with an actual value of null $. This ranking indicates that agriculture played a minimal role in the overall economic structure of the country during this period, reflecting the challenges faced by the Armenian agricultural sector under the Soviet economic system.
The low contribution of agriculture to GDP can be attributed to several factors, including the emphasis on industrialization in Soviet policy, which often prioritized manufacturing and heavy industry over agricultural development. Additionally, the geographical constraints and climatic conditions of Armenia, characterized by mountainous terrain, may have limited agricultural expansion and productivity.
Historically, Armenia has been known for its wine production and the cultivation of fruits, particularly apricots and grapes. However, the 1970s marked a period of significant economic transformation, where agriculture's importance was overshadowed by urbanization and industrial growth, leading to a marginalization of the rural economy.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data