Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country 1969
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Afghanistan | NaN $ |
2 | Albania | NaN $ |
3 | Algeria | 432,204,047 $ |
4 | Angola | NaN $ |
5 | Antigua and Barbuda | NaN $ |
6 | Argentina | 2,871,142,801 $ |
7 | Armenia | NaN $ |
8 | Australia | NaN $ |
9 | Austria | NaN $ |
10 | Azerbaijan | NaN $ |
11 | Bahamas | NaN $ |
12 | Bahrain | NaN $ |
13 | Bangladesh | 4,694,023,272 $ |
14 | Barbados | NaN $ |
15 | Belarus | NaN $ |
16 | Belgium | NaN $ |
17 | Belize | NaN $ |
18 | China | 29,904,947,599 $ |
19 | Brazil | 4,148,971,366 $ |
20 | Côte d'Ivoire | 456,992,325 $ |
21 | Cameroon | 354,063,427 $ |
22 | Costa Rica | 197,615,094 $ |
23 | Benin | 127,327,024 $ |
24 | Bhutan | NaN $ |
25 | Bolivia | NaN $ |
26 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN $ |
27 | Colombia | 1,762,875,468 $ |
28 | Chile | 546,511,628 $ |
29 | Chad | 181,052,806 $ |
30 | Burkina Faso | 153,140,095 $ |
31 | Congo | 46,930,193 $ |
32 | Botswana | 29,940,120 $ |
33 | Brunei Darussalam | NaN $ |
34 | Bulgaria | NaN $ |
35 | Burundi | NaN $ |
36 | Cabo Verde | NaN $ |
37 | Cambodia | NaN $ |
38 | Canada | NaN $ |
39 | Central African Republic | 63,471,157 $ |
40 | Comoros | NaN $ |
41 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | NaN $ |
42 | Cook Islands | NaN $ |
43 | Croatia | NaN $ |
44 | Cuba | NaN $ |
45 | Cyprus | NaN $ |
46 | Czech Republic | NaN $ |
47 | Denmark | NaN $ |
48 | Djibouti | NaN $ |
49 | Dominica | NaN $ |
50 | India | 24,079,079,520 $ |
51 | Egypt | 1,767,796,610 $ |
52 | Iran | 1,412,494,635 $ |
53 | Ghana | 901,111,675 $ |
54 | Ecuador | 817,011,643 $ |
55 | Guatemala | 468,222,500 $ |
56 | Iraq | 451,974,237 $ |
57 | Kenya | 450,603,819 $ |
58 | El Salvador | 380,400,000 $ |
59 | Dominican Republic | 262,100,000 $ |
60 | Equatorial Guinea | NaN $ |
61 | Eritrea | NaN $ |
62 | Estonia | NaN $ |
63 | Honduras | 218,600,000 $ |
64 | Jordan | 87,370,484 $ |
65 | Gabon | 59,239,752 $ |
66 | Guyana | 44,700,000 $ |
67 | Eswatini | 30,659,387 $ |
68 | Ethiopia | NaN $ |
69 | Fiji | 44,373,285 $ |
70 | Finland | NaN $ |
71 | France | 9,523,263,629 $ |
72 | Gambia | 14,544,233 $ |
73 | Georgia | NaN $ |
74 | Germany | NaN $ |
75 | Greece | NaN $ |
76 | Grenada | NaN $ |
77 | Guinea | NaN $ |
78 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN $ |
79 | Haiti | NaN $ |
80 | Hungary | NaN $ |
81 | Iceland | NaN $ |
82 | Indonesia | NaN $ |
83 | Ireland | NaN $ |
84 | Israel | NaN $ |
85 | Italy | NaN $ |
86 | Jamaica | NaN $ |
87 | Japan | NaN $ |
88 | Kazakhstan | NaN $ |
89 | Kiribati | NaN $ |
90 | Kuwait | NaN $ |
91 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN $ |
92 | Laos | NaN $ |
93 | Latvia | NaN $ |
94 | Lebanon | NaN $ |
95 | Liberia | 75,566,400 $ |
96 | Lesotho | 27,818,844 $ |
97 | Libya | NaN $ |
98 | Lithuania | NaN $ |
99 | Luxembourg | NaN $ |
100 | Mexico | 3,393,408,000 $ |
101 | Philippines | 2,515,704,077 $ |
102 | Netherlands | 1,868,164,032 $ |
103 | Malaysia | 1,214,326,114 $ |
104 | Peru | 1,027,413,219 $ |
105 | Morocco | 705,859,105 $ |
106 | Nepal | 523,851,852 $ |
107 | Niger | 415,697,641 $ |
108 | Papua New Guinea | 230,484,937 $ |
109 | Madagascar | 226,077,751 $ |
110 | Mali | 192,985,393 $ |
111 | Malawi | 110,880,044 $ |
112 | Maldives | NaN $ |
113 | Malta | NaN $ |
114 | Mauritania | 48,737,427 $ |
115 | Mauritius | NaN $ |
116 | Mongolia | NaN $ |
117 | Montenegro | NaN $ |
118 | Mozambique | NaN $ |
119 | Myanmar | NaN $ |
120 | Namibia | NaN $ |
121 | Nauru | NaN $ |
122 | New Zealand | NaN $ |
123 | Nicaragua | NaN $ |
124 | Nigeria | NaN $ |
125 | North Korea | NaN $ |
126 | North Macedonia | NaN $ |
127 | Norway | NaN $ |
128 | Pakistan | 2,947,920,958 $ |
129 | Oman | 38,636,909 $ |
130 | Panama | NaN $ |
131 | Paraguay | NaN $ |
132 | Poland | NaN $ |
133 | Portugal | NaN $ |
134 | Qatar | NaN $ |
135 | Republic of Moldova | NaN $ |
136 | Romania | NaN $ |
137 | Russia | NaN $ |
138 | Rwanda | 124,146,995 $ |
139 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | NaN $ |
140 | Saint Lucia | NaN $ |
141 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | NaN $ |
142 | Samoa | NaN $ |
143 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN $ |
144 | South Korea | 2,039,353,511 $ |
145 | Saudi Arabia | 220,666,667 $ |
146 | Senegal | 215,504,623 $ |
147 | Serbia | NaN $ |
148 | Seychelles | NaN $ |
149 | Sierra Leone | 109,380,044 $ |
150 | Singapore | NaN $ |
151 | Slovakia | NaN $ |
152 | Slovenia | NaN $ |
153 | Solomon Islands | NaN $ |
154 | Somalia | NaN $ |
155 | South Africa | 1,269,774,605 $ |
156 | South Sudan | NaN $ |
157 | Spain | NaN $ |
158 | Thailand | 1,920,538,389 $ |
159 | Sri Lanka | 576,361,748 $ |
160 | State of Palestine | NaN $ |
161 | Sudan | NaN $ |
162 | Venezuela | 729,288,889 $ |
163 | Zimbabwe | 341,502,700 $ |
164 | Zambia | 190,000,000 $ |
165 | Togo | 115,017,387 $ |
166 | Suriname | 17,950,000 $ |
167 | Sweden | NaN $ |
168 | Switzerland | NaN $ |
169 | Syrian Arab Republic | NaN $ |
170 | Tajikistan | NaN $ |
171 | Tanzania | NaN $ |
172 | Timor-Leste | NaN $ |
173 | Tonga | NaN $ |
174 | Trinidad and Tobago | NaN $ |
175 | Turkey | 7,955,555,556 $ |
176 | Tunisia | 205,333,333 $ |
177 | Turkmenistan | NaN $ |
178 | Tuvalu | NaN $ |
179 | Uganda | 530,392,157 $ |
180 | Ukraine | NaN $ |
181 | United Arab Emirates | NaN $ |
182 | United Kingdom | NaN $ |
183 | United States | NaN $ |
184 | Uruguay | NaN $ |
185 | Uzbekistan | NaN $ |
186 | Vanuatu | NaN $ |
187 | Vietnam | NaN $ |
188 | Yemen | NaN $ |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Afghanistan
- #2
Albania
- #3
Algeria
- #4
Angola
- #5
Antigua and Barbuda
- #6
Argentina
- #7
Armenia
- #8
Australia
- #9
Austria
- #10
Azerbaijan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #188
Yemen
- #187
Vietnam
- #186
Vanuatu
- #185
Uzbekistan
- #184
Uruguay
- #183
United States
- #182
United Kingdom
- #181
United Arab Emirates
- #180
Ukraine
- #179
Uganda
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Introduction to Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP in 1969
The Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country provides critical insight into the economic impact of the agricultural sector across various nations. In 1969, this metric served as a vital indicator of economic health and development, particularly in agrarian economies where agriculture played a pivotal role in GDP composition. By examining this statistic, economists and policymakers in 1969 could assess the sector's contribution to national economies, understand global agricultural dynamics, and make informed investment decisions. This article delves into the intricate patterns and global significance of this metric in 1969, offering a comprehensive analysis of the data.
Economic Impact of Agriculture in 1969
The economic landscape of 1969 showcased the agricultural sector as a cornerstone of GDP, especially in developing countries. Nations like China and India demonstrated remarkable figures, with agriculture generating value added amounts of $29.9 billion and $24.1 billion respectively. These figures underscore agriculture's substantial contribution to the economic prosperity and development in these populous nations. In contrast, countries such as Gambia and Suriname showed much smaller contributions, with agriculture value added figures of $14.5 million and $17.9 million, highlighting the varied economic roles agriculture played across different regions.
Global Comparisons and Trends
In 1969, notable disparities emerged in agricultural value added as a share of GDP, reflecting underlying economic structures and dependency on agriculture. While China and India led the global rankings, European nations such as France also marked significant agricultural value added of $9.5 billion, illustrating the sector's importance even in industrialized nations. Meanwhile, the lowest contributions were seen in countries like Lesotho and Botswana, with figures of $27.8 million and $29.9 million respectively, where other sectors possibly dominated the economic landscape.
Regional Variations in Agricultural Value Added
The regional variations in 1969 highlighted distinct agricultural contributions across continents. In Asia, countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan recorded significant agricultural activities, showing figures of $4.7 billion and $2.9 billion respectively, emphasizing agriculture's role in South Asian economies. In Latin America, Brazil and Argentina were prominent agricultural players, with their value added figures at $4.1 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. These statistics reflected how different regions prioritized agricultural productivity based on climatic, social, and economic factors.
Year-over-Year Changes in Agricultural Value Added
Analyzing year-over-year changes in agricultural value added in 1969 reveals significant insights into sectoral growth and decline. India experienced a notable increase of $2.1 billion, representing a 9.4% rise, pointing towards enhancements in agricultural productivity and investment. Similarly, Bangladesh saw a 17.1% increase, adding $686 million, which could be attributed to agricultural reforms or favorable climatic conditions. Conversely, Algeria and Senegal witnessed declines of 8.3% and 13.8% respectively, suggesting challenges in agricultural output or economic shifts towards other sectors.
Economic Development and Agricultural Dependency
The data from 1969 also provides insights into the relationship between economic development and agricultural dependency. Countries with higher GDP shares from agriculture often correlated with lower industrial development levels, indicating a reliance on primary sectors. For instance, Bangladesh and Pakistan's substantial agricultural figures aligned with their development status at the time. This dependency on agriculture necessitated policies aimed at diversifying economies and enhancing agricultural efficiency to foster overall economic growth.
Conclusion
In summary, the Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country in 1969 offers a window into the economic fabric of nations and their reliance on agriculture. From the towering figures in China and India to the modest contributions in the Gambia and Suriname, this metric underscores the diverse roles agriculture played in shaping national economies. Understanding these patterns aids in grasping the broader economic dynamics and development trajectories of countries during this period, reinforcing the importance of agriculture in global economic discourse.
Insights by country
Turkey
In 1969, Turkey ranked 4th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The total value of agriculture in Turkey for that year was approximately $7,955,555,556, highlighting the sector's significant contribution to the national economy.
This high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including Turkey's diverse climate and fertile land, which are conducive to various agricultural products. The economy during this period was heavily reliant on agriculture, with a large portion of the population engaged in farming and related activities.
Additionally, agriculture played a critical role in food security and the livelihoods of rural communities, contributing to Turkey's socio-economic stability. By the late 20th century, Turkey continued to evolve its agricultural practices, leading to modern advancements and increased productivity.
Egypt
In 1969, Egypt ranked 14th out of 188 countries in terms of Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP, indicating a significant reliance on the agricultural sector. The value of agriculture's contribution to the economy was approximately $1,767,796,610, showcasing the importance of this sector within the national economic framework.
This substantial share of agriculture in Egypt's GDP can be attributed to various factors, including the country's historical dependence on farming, particularly in the fertile Nile Delta region. The agricultural sector provided employment to a large portion of the population, underpinning livelihoods and contributing to food security.
Interestingly, during this period, Egypt was undergoing significant economic reforms and modernization efforts, which would later impact agricultural practices and productivity. The country has a long-standing agricultural tradition, with crops such as cotton, rice, and wheat being central to its economy, reflecting its strategic geographic advantages.
Latvia
In 1969, Latvia ranked 126 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this statistic was null, indicating that data may have been unavailable or not recorded for this period. This ranking reflects the broader economic context of Latvia during the late 1960s, a time when it was part of the Soviet Union, where agricultural output and practices were heavily influenced by centralized planning.
Several factors contributed to Latvia's low ranking in agricultural value added as a share of GDP. The Soviet agricultural policies often prioritized industrial development over agriculture, leading to neglect and underinvestment in the agricultural sector. Additionally, collective farming practices may have resulted in inefficiencies that further diminished the agricultural sector's contribution to the overall economy.
Interestingly, during this time, Latvia's economy was undergoing significant changes, and while agriculture was essential, it was increasingly overshadowed by industrialization. By the end of the 20th century, Latvia would transition to a market economy, which would eventually lead to a more diverse economic structure, moving away from the heavy reliance on agriculture that characterized its status in 1969.
Solomon Islands
In 1969, the Solomon Islands ranked 164th out of 188 countries regarding the share of Agriculture Value Added as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The specific value for Agriculture Value Added in this context was reported as null $, indicating either a lack of data or that agricultural contributions were not quantified effectively at that time.
This statistic reflects the economy's reliance on agriculture, which has traditionally been a critical sector for the Solomon Islands, contributing to food security and livelihood for a significant portion of the population. Factors such as geographical isolation, limited access to markets, and reliance on subsistence farming practices may have contributed to the low ranking and unclear agricultural value at this time.
Further, the historical context of the Solomon Islands in 1969 includes a period of post-colonial development challenges, which likely influenced agricultural productivity and economic measurements. The agricultural sector remains vital for the country, with crops like cocoa, copra, and palm oil being key exports in later years.
Singapore
In 1969, Singapore ranked 161 out of 188 countries regarding Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP, with the value being null $. This statistic reflects the minimal contribution of the agricultural sector to Singapore's overall economy during this period, indicating a significant reliance on other industries for economic growth.
The low agricultural output can be attributed to Singapore's limited land area and urbanization, which prioritized industrial and service sectors over agriculture. As a small island nation, Singapore faced challenges in sustaining large-scale agricultural production, leading to a focus on trade and imports to meet food supply needs.
As a point of interest, Singapore's economy has since transformed dramatically, with the agricultural share of GDP diminishing further as the country developed into a global financial hub and advanced economy, showcasing a significant shift in economic structure from the late 20th century onwards.
Samoa
In 1969, Samoa ranked 157 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this measure was null, indicating that data was either not collected or not available for that year.
This low ranking reflects the limited economic diversification in Samoa during this period, where agriculture played a crucial role in the economy, primarily through subsistence farming and traditional practices. Factors contributing to this statistic include the country's geographical constraints, reliance on natural resources, and limited access to international markets.
Interesting to note, the agricultural sector continues to be significant in Samoa, contributing to food security and local livelihoods, although the share of agriculture in GDP has evolved over the decades due to increasing tourism and remittances from overseas Samoans.
Mongolia
In 1969, Mongolia ranked 134th out of 188 countries in terms of Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this metric was recorded as null $, indicating a lack of comprehensive data or negligible agricultural contribution to the economy during that period.
This low ranking and value reflect the socio-economic conditions of Mongolia at the time, characterized by a predominantly nomadic lifestyle and reliance on herding rather than intensive agricultural practices. The country's vast steppes and harsh climate limited the development of a robust agricultural sector, which traditionally struggled to contribute significantly to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Additionally, the political landscape in 1969 was marked by Mongolia's status as a socialist state aligned with the Soviet Union, which influenced agricultural policies and practices. The focus on livestock and the communal farming model may have further contributed to the underperformance of the agricultural sector.
Trinidad and Tobago
In 1969, Trinidad and Tobago ranked 177th out of 188 countries in terms of Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP, with a reported value of null $. This indicates that the contribution of the agricultural sector to the national economy was minimal during this period.
The low agricultural value added can be attributed to several factors, including the country's focus on the oil and gas industry, which became the dominant sector in the economy. The discovery of significant oil reserves in the 1970s led to a rapid shift in economic priorities, diverting investment and labor away from agriculture.
Interestingly, despite the decline in agriculture's economic significance, Trinidad and Tobago has a rich agricultural history, producing crops such as cocoa, sugar cane, and rice. However, the increasing reliance on oil exports has historically overshadowed these agricultural contributions.
United States
In 1969, the United States ranked 183rd out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with the actual value being null. This statistic reflects the diminishing importance of the agricultural sector in the overall economy as industrialization and services became predominant in the post-World War II era.
The low share of agriculture in GDP can be attributed to several factors, including significant advances in technology and mechanization in agriculture, which increased productivity but reduced the number of people employed in farming. Additionally, urbanization trends drew the labor force away from rural areas, further decreasing agriculture's economic footprint.
By the late 1960s, the United States was transitioning towards a more diversified economy, where sectors such as manufacturing and services began to play a more crucial role. This shift is indicative of a broader trend observed in many developed nations during this period, where agriculture's contribution to GDP typically declines as economies evolve.
Malawi
In 1969, Malawi ranked 52nd out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The total value for agriculture in that year was approximately $110,880,044. This significant contribution underscores the importance of agriculture to Malawi's economy, reflecting its reliance on subsistence farming and cash crops such as tobacco, tea, and sugar.
The high share of agriculture in GDP can be attributed to several factors, including the country's largely agrarian population, which depended heavily on farming for both sustenance and income. Additionally, the climate and soil conditions in Malawi favor agricultural production, although they are also susceptible to droughts and other adverse weather conditions.
During this period, agriculture was not only a major economic driver but also a critical source of employment, with a significant portion of the population engaged in farming activities. This reliance on agriculture has continued to shape Malawi's economic policies and development strategies in subsequent decades.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data