Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country 1963
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Afghanistan | NaN $ |
2 | Albania | NaN $ |
3 | Algeria | 415,710,148 $ |
4 | Angola | NaN $ |
5 | Antigua and Barbuda | NaN $ |
6 | Argentina | NaN $ |
7 | Armenia | NaN $ |
8 | Australia | NaN $ |
9 | Austria | NaN $ |
10 | Azerbaijan | NaN $ |
11 | Bahamas | NaN $ |
12 | Bahrain | NaN $ |
13 | Bangladesh | 3,039,893,213 $ |
14 | Barbados | NaN $ |
15 | Belarus | NaN $ |
16 | Belgium | NaN $ |
17 | Belize | NaN $ |
18 | China | 20,208,790,316 $ |
19 | Brazil | 3,482,148,272 $ |
20 | Benin | 111,013,027 $ |
21 | Bhutan | NaN $ |
22 | Bolivia | NaN $ |
23 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN $ |
24 | Burkina Faso | 151,680,604 $ |
25 | Botswana | 15,132,392 $ |
26 | Brunei Darussalam | NaN $ |
27 | Bulgaria | NaN $ |
28 | Burundi | NaN $ |
29 | Cabo Verde | NaN $ |
30 | Cambodia | NaN $ |
31 | Cameroon | NaN $ |
32 | Canada | NaN $ |
33 | Central African Republic | NaN $ |
34 | Chile | 437,500,000 $ |
35 | Chad | 141,371,779 $ |
36 | Colombia | NaN $ |
37 | Comoros | NaN $ |
38 | Congo | 36,089,934 $ |
39 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | NaN $ |
40 | Cook Islands | NaN $ |
41 | Côte d'Ivoire | 336,132,441 $ |
42 | Costa Rica | 125,231,200 $ |
43 | Croatia | NaN $ |
44 | Cuba | NaN $ |
45 | Cyprus | NaN $ |
46 | Czech Republic | NaN $ |
47 | Denmark | NaN $ |
48 | Djibouti | NaN $ |
49 | Dominica | NaN $ |
50 | Dominican Republic | NaN $ |
51 | Ecuador | 309,121,374 $ |
52 | Egypt | NaN $ |
53 | El Salvador | NaN $ |
54 | Equatorial Guinea | NaN $ |
55 | Eritrea | NaN $ |
56 | Estonia | NaN $ |
57 | Eswatini | 20,999,580 $ |
58 | Ethiopia | NaN $ |
59 | Fiji | 48,986,274 $ |
60 | Finland | NaN $ |
61 | France | 7,521,425,267 $ |
62 | Gabon | 68,100,412 $ |
63 | Gambia | NaN $ |
64 | Georgia | NaN $ |
65 | Germany | NaN $ |
66 | Ghana | 553,286,407 $ |
67 | Greece | NaN $ |
68 | Grenada | NaN $ |
69 | Guatemala | NaN $ |
70 | Guinea | NaN $ |
71 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN $ |
72 | Guyana | 42,991,308 $ |
73 | Haiti | NaN $ |
74 | Honduras | 141,150,000 $ |
75 | Hungary | NaN $ |
76 | Iceland | NaN $ |
77 | India | 18,965,309,225 $ |
78 | Indonesia | NaN $ |
79 | Iran | 1,096,975,489 $ |
80 | Iraq | NaN $ |
81 | Ireland | NaN $ |
82 | Israel | NaN $ |
83 | Italy | NaN $ |
84 | Jamaica | NaN $ |
85 | Japan | NaN $ |
86 | Jordan | NaN $ |
87 | Kazakhstan | NaN $ |
88 | Kenya | 356,271,857 $ |
89 | Kiribati | NaN $ |
90 | Kuwait | NaN $ |
91 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN $ |
92 | Laos | NaN $ |
93 | Latvia | NaN $ |
94 | Lebanon | NaN $ |
95 | Lesotho | 39,409,912 $ |
96 | Liberia | NaN $ |
97 | Libya | NaN $ |
98 | Lithuania | NaN $ |
99 | Luxembourg | NaN $ |
100 | Madagascar | NaN $ |
101 | Malaysia | 881,648,210 $ |
102 | Maldives | NaN $ |
103 | Mali | NaN $ |
104 | Malta | NaN $ |
105 | Mauritania | 45,667,745 $ |
106 | Mauritius | NaN $ |
107 | Mexico | NaN $ |
108 | Mongolia | NaN $ |
109 | Montenegro | NaN $ |
110 | Morocco | NaN $ |
111 | Mozambique | NaN $ |
112 | Myanmar | NaN $ |
113 | Namibia | NaN $ |
114 | Nauru | NaN $ |
115 | Nepal | NaN $ |
116 | Netherlands | NaN $ |
117 | New Zealand | NaN $ |
118 | Nicaragua | NaN $ |
119 | Niger | 427,690,122 $ |
120 | Nigeria | NaN $ |
121 | North Korea | NaN $ |
122 | North Macedonia | NaN $ |
123 | Norway | NaN $ |
124 | Oman | NaN $ |
125 | Pakistan | 1,798,612,033 $ |
126 | Panama | NaN $ |
127 | Philippines | 1,336,422,125 $ |
128 | Papua New Guinea | 121,520,017 $ |
129 | Paraguay | NaN $ |
130 | Peru | 615,175,802 $ |
131 | Poland | NaN $ |
132 | Portugal | NaN $ |
133 | Qatar | NaN $ |
134 | Republic of Moldova | NaN $ |
135 | Romania | NaN $ |
136 | Russia | NaN $ |
137 | Rwanda | NaN $ |
138 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | NaN $ |
139 | Saint Lucia | NaN $ |
140 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | NaN $ |
141 | Samoa | NaN $ |
142 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN $ |
143 | Saudi Arabia | NaN $ |
144 | Senegal | 196,071,239 $ |
145 | Serbia | NaN $ |
146 | Seychelles | NaN $ |
147 | Sierra Leone | NaN $ |
148 | Singapore | NaN $ |
149 | Slovakia | NaN $ |
150 | Slovenia | NaN $ |
151 | Solomon Islands | NaN $ |
152 | Somalia | NaN $ |
153 | South Africa | 948,713,286 $ |
154 | South Korea | NaN $ |
155 | South Sudan | NaN $ |
156 | Spain | NaN $ |
157 | Sri Lanka | 401,354,269 $ |
158 | State of Palestine | NaN $ |
159 | Sudan | NaN $ |
160 | Suriname | 11,050,000 $ |
161 | Sweden | NaN $ |
162 | Switzerland | NaN $ |
163 | Syrian Arab Republic | NaN $ |
164 | Tajikistan | NaN $ |
165 | Tanzania | NaN $ |
166 | Thailand | 1,170,652,924 $ |
167 | Timor-Leste | NaN $ |
168 | Togo | 74,280,719 $ |
169 | Tonga | NaN $ |
170 | Trinidad and Tobago | NaN $ |
171 | Tunisia | NaN $ |
172 | Turkey | 5,522,222,222 $ |
173 | Malawi | 93,940,075 $ |
174 | Turkmenistan | NaN $ |
175 | Tuvalu | NaN $ |
176 | Uganda | 245,236,897 $ |
177 | Ukraine | NaN $ |
178 | United Arab Emirates | NaN $ |
179 | United Kingdom | NaN $ |
180 | United States | NaN $ |
181 | Uruguay | NaN $ |
182 | Uzbekistan | NaN $ |
183 | Vanuatu | NaN $ |
184 | Venezuela | 510,000,000 $ |
185 | Vietnam | NaN $ |
186 | Yemen | NaN $ |
187 | Zambia | 93,571,429 $ |
188 | Zimbabwe | NaN $ |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Afghanistan
- #2
Albania
- #3
Algeria
- #4
Angola
- #5
Antigua and Barbuda
- #6
Argentina
- #7
Armenia
- #8
Australia
- #9
Austria
- #10
Azerbaijan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #188
Zimbabwe
- #187
Zambia
- #186
Yemen
- #185
Vietnam
- #184
Venezuela
- #183
Vanuatu
- #182
Uzbekistan
- #181
Uruguay
- #180
United States
- #179
United Kingdom
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The significance of agriculture as a foundation of economic stability and growth was evident in 1963, particularly when viewing the Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country. This metric serves as an indicator of the economic impact that farming sectors have within national economies, guiding investment strategies and policy decisions globally. By analyzing data from that year, it becomes clear how intertwined agriculture and prosperity were, providing insights into the agricultural economy's prevailing dynamics and their implications for development.
Economic Context of 1963
In 1963, global economies were shaped by a variety of factors including post-war recovery efforts, technological advancements, and burgeoning industrial sectors. Amidst these changes, agriculture continued to hold substantial importance, especially in countries where it contributed significantly to GDP. For instance, China led the pack with an agriculture value added of $20,208,790,316, indicating the sheer scale of its farming sector. This period marked a transitional point where developing nations relied heavily on agriculture as a cornerstone of their economic framework, balancing industrial growth with agrarian productivity.
Regional Variations and Their Impacts
The data from 1963 reveals stark differences in agricultural contributions to GDP across various regions. Asian countries like India ($18,965,309,225) and Bangladesh ($3,039,893,213) demonstrated high agricultural outputs, reflecting their dependence on agrarian economies. Meanwhile, African nations such as Suriname and Botswana showed much lower values, with $11,050,000 and $15,132,392 respectively, indicating different stages of economic development and diversification. This diverse range of contributions highlighted the varying degrees of dependence on agriculture between developing and more industrially advanced countries.
Economic Trends in Agriculture
The economic landscape of 1963 was one of transformation, as evidenced by the year-over-year changes in agricultural value added. Notable increases in countries like India (+$2,850,324,156 or 17.7%) and China (+$1,803,558,372 or 9.8%) underscored a growing reliance on agriculture as a driver for economic expansion. Conversely, nations like Sri Lanka and Iran witnessed declines in agricultural value, suggesting shifts towards other sectors or the impact of policy changes. These trends were emblematic of broader transitions in global economic structures, where some countries were beginning to diversify beyond agriculture to incorporate industrial and service sectors.
Agriculture and Development Correlations
Agriculture's role in development was pivotal, especially in nations where it constituted a major share of GDP. Countries with substantial agricultural sectors often experienced varied rates of development, influenced by factors such as technological advancements in farming, access to markets, and government policies promoting agricultural productivity. For instance, Brazil's agriculture value added, standing at $3,482,148,272, reflected its substantial coffee and sugarcane industries, which were integral to its economic strategy. Meanwhile, the lesser values seen in countries like Guyana ($42,991,308) indicated limited agricultural exports, potentially constraining economic growth.
Policy Impact on Agricultural Economies
Policy frameworks played an essential role in shaping the agricultural landscape in 1963. Countries with robust agricultural policies often saw increased investments and productivity improvements. In contrast, nations experiencing decreases, such as Sri Lanka (-$44,561,122 or -10.0%) and Iran (-$21,383,880 or -1.9%), highlighted the potential negative impacts of inadequate or misaligned policies on agricultural sectors. This correlation underscores the importance of strategic agricultural policies in fostering economic resilience and growth, emphasizing the need for continuous evaluation and adaptation to changing global conditions.
In summary, the Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country in 1963 offers a snapshot of the global economic landscape, where agriculture served as a vital component of national economies. The variations in agricultural contributions across regions and the insights into economic trends and policy impacts provide a fascinating glimpse into the dynamics that influenced global development during that era. As countries navigated the complexities of economic advancement, the role of agriculture remained a critical consideration in shaping their future trajectories.
Insights by country
Timor-Leste
In 1963, Timor-Leste ranked 173 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. Notably, the precise value for this statistic in Timor-Leste was null $, indicating a lack of sufficient data or the minimal contribution of agriculture to the country's economy at that time.
This ranking reflects the historical context of Timor-Leste, as the region was under Portuguese colonial rule until 1975, which limited the development of its agricultural sector. Contributing factors to this low ranking may include inadequate infrastructure, limited access to markets, and a lack of investment in agricultural technology and education.
Additionally, the economic landscape of Timor-Leste during this period was heavily influenced by political instability and colonial policies that did not prioritize agricultural development. Understanding this historical backdrop is essential for interpreting the challenges faced by Timor-Leste in cultivating a robust agricultural economy in subsequent years.
New Zealand
In 1963, New Zealand ranked 133rd out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this statistic was recorded as null $, indicating that the data was either not collected or not reported for that year.
This ranking reflects a period when New Zealand's economy was heavily reliant on agriculture, with a significant portion of its GDP derived from this sector. Factors contributing to the agricultural prominence included the country's favorable climate, fertile lands, and a strong tradition of farming, particularly in sheep and dairy production.
Interestingly, during this time, New Zealand was known as one of the world's leading exporters of dairy products and lamb, which further underscores the historical importance of agriculture in shaping the national economy and trade relations.
Lithuania
In 1963, Lithuania ranked 116 out of 188 countries regarding the share of agriculture value added as a percentage of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The specific value for this statistic was recorded as null $, indicating that the data may have been either unavailable or not reported for that year.
This statistic reflects the economic context of Lithuania during a period when it was part of the Soviet Union, where agricultural practices were heavily influenced by centralized planning and collective farming. The prominence of agriculture in the economy was common in many Eastern European countries during this era, although Lithuania was transitioning towards more industrial activities.
Several factors contributed to the agricultural output in Lithuania, including the country's fertile soil and favorable climate for crop production. However, the reliance on state-managed agriculture could have limited the efficiency and profitability of the sector, leading to a relatively low agricultural value added in comparison to other economic activities.
Central African Republic
In 1963, the Central African Republic ranked 68th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this statistic in that year is recorded as null, indicating a lack of available data or significant underreporting within agricultural outputs at the time.
This ranking suggests that agriculture played a noteworthy role in the economy of the Central African Republic during the early 1960s, a period characterized by the country's reliance on subsistence farming and cash crops such as cotton and coffee. Various factors, including the country’s geographic features, climate, and the socio-political landscape, contributed to the agricultural dependency of its economy.
Interestingly, agriculture has historically been a cornerstone of the Central African Republic’s economy, with the vast majority of the population engaged in farming activities. This reliance has often been linked to issues such as food security, rural poverty, and limited industrial development, which have continued to influence the nation’s economic structure in subsequent decades.
Qatar
In 1963, Qatar ranked 144th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with the value being null dollars. This indicates that agriculture played a minimal role in the country's economy during this period, reflecting Qatar's early stage of development and reliance on other sectors, particularly oil and gas.
The negligible contribution of agriculture to GDP can be attributed to Qatar's harsh desert climate, which limits arable land and suitable conditions for traditional farming practices. Additionally, the discovery of oil in the mid-20th century shifted the country's economic focus towards hydrocarbon extraction and export, further marginalizing the agricultural sector.
As a point of interest, while agriculture represented only a small fraction of GDP in 1963, the subsequent decades saw a significant transformation in Qatar's economy, with efforts to diversify and invest in agriculture, particularly through modern techniques and technology in more recent years.
Liberia
In 1963, Liberia ranked 114th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for agriculture's contribution to the GDP during this period is recorded as null $, indicating a lack of available data or reporting on this statistic.
The agricultural sector in Liberia has historically played a crucial role in the economy, with a significant portion of the population engaged in farming activities. However, the disruption caused by civil conflicts and economic instability in subsequent decades has likely impacted the reliability of economic data from this era.
Factors contributing to the low reporting and ranking may include political instability, lack of infrastructure, and limited access to markets. Additionally, the predominance of subsistence farming in Liberia often results in underreporting of agricultural output, which could explain the absence of a clear value for agriculture's share of GDP in 1963.
Rwanda
In 1963, Rwanda ranked 148 out of 188 countries regarding agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with a reported value of null $. This statistic reflects the economic structure of Rwanda during a period when the country was largely agrarian, with agriculture playing a crucial role in its economy.
The low value indicates that data may not have been comprehensively recorded or that the agricultural sector was not contributing significantly to the GDP at that time. Several factors could contribute to this scenario, including the predominance of subsistence farming, limited access to markets, and the nascent stage of economic development following the country's independence from Belgium in 1962.
Additionally, the agricultural sector has historically faced challenges such as land fragmentation, reliance on rain-fed agriculture, and vulnerability to climatic shocks. These issues have continued to influence Rwanda's economic performance and agricultural productivity over the decades.
Guyana
In 1963, Guyana ranked 37th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of its gross domestic product (GDP). The total value of agriculture's contribution to the GDP was approximately $42,991,308, highlighting the sector's significant role in the nation's economy during that period.
This substantial figure can be attributed to Guyana's rich natural resources and favorable climate, which supported the cultivation of various crops, including sugar and rice, that were crucial for both domestic consumption and export. The agriculture sector was particularly vital for employment, providing livelihoods for a significant portion of the population.
Furthermore, during the early 1960s, Guyana was in the midst of economic development initiatives that emphasized agricultural expansion, which contributed to its high ranking. As a country with a diverse range of agricultural products, Guyana's economy was largely influenced by this sector, which laid the groundwork for its future economic policies and trade relationships.
Hungary
In 1963, Hungary ranked 97th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this statistic is recorded as null $, indicating a lack of available data or a potential shift in the economic structure during that period.
The agricultural sector has historically played a significant role in Hungary's economy, particularly in the post-World War II era, where collectivization policies transformed agricultural practices. However, by the early 1960s, Hungary was experiencing industrialization, which may have contributed to a decreasing share of agriculture in the GDP as the economy diversified.
Factors such as urban migration, advancements in technology, and government reforms in agriculture likely influenced this statistic. Additionally, the transition to a more industrialized economy also reflects broader trends in Eastern Europe during the Cold War, which were characterized by shifts from agrarian-based economies to industrial and service-oriented economies.
Portugal
In 1963, Portugal ranked 143rd out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The exact value for this statistic was reported as null, indicating a lack of available data or significant underreporting of agricultural output during this period.
This low ranking reflects the challenges faced by the Portuguese agricultural sector at the time, which was characterized by a heavy reliance on traditional farming methods and limited technological advancement. The economy was in transition, with industrialization beginning to take root, which often led to a decline in the relative importance of agriculture within the national GDP.
Additionally, factors such as political instability, the impact of the Estado Novo regime, and economic isolation contributed to the agricultural sector's difficulties. Interestingly, during this era, Portugal was also known for its production of wine, cork, and olive oil, which remain significant to its agricultural identity today.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data