Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country 1968
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 |  Afghanistan | NaN $ |
2 |  Albania | NaN $ |
3 |  Algeria | 471,495,311 $ |
4 |  Angola | NaN $ |
5 |  Antigua and Barbuda | NaN $ |
6 |  Argentina | 2,570,000,119 $ |
7 |  Armenia | NaN $ |
8 |  Australia | NaN $ |
9 |  Austria | NaN $ |
10 |  Azerbaijan | NaN $ |
11 |  Bahamas | NaN $ |
12 |  Bahrain | NaN $ |
13 |  Bangladesh | 4,007,943,132 $ |
14 |  Barbados | NaN $ |
15 |  Belarus | NaN $ |
16 |  Belgium | NaN $ |
17 |  Belize | NaN $ |
18 |  China | 29,502,802,827 $ |
19 |  Brazil | 4,006,319,533 $ |
20 |  Côte d'Ivoire | 455,638,457 $ |
21 |  Cameroon | 331,780,232 $ |
22 |  Costa Rica | 180,135,849 $ |
23 |  Benin | 126,835,487 $ |
24 |  Bhutan | NaN $ |
25 |  Bolivia | NaN $ |
26 |  Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN $ |
27 |  Colombia | 1,672,686,092 $ |
28 |  Chile | 521,739,130 $ |
29 |  Chad | 179,439,535 $ |
30 |  Burkina Faso | 145,472,009 $ |
31 |  Congo | 49,280,048 $ |
32 |  Botswana | 28,940,028 $ |
33 |  Brunei Darussalam | NaN $ |
34 |  Bulgaria | NaN $ |
35 |  Burundi | NaN $ |
36 |  Cabo Verde | NaN $ |
37 |  Cambodia | NaN $ |
38 |  Canada | NaN $ |
39 |  Central African Republic | 65,033,545 $ |
40 |  Comoros | NaN $ |
41 |  Congo, Democratic Republic of the | NaN $ |
42 |  Cook Islands | NaN $ |
43 |  Croatia | NaN $ |
44 |  Cuba | NaN $ |
45 |  Cyprus | NaN $ |
46 |  Czech Republic | NaN $ |
47 |  Denmark | NaN $ |
48 |  Djibouti | NaN $ |
49 |  Dominica | NaN $ |
50 |  India | 22,015,377,200 $ |
51 |  Egypt | 1,556,775,701 $ |
52 |  Iran | 1,367,084,587 $ |
53 |  Ecuador | 756,111,450 $ |
54 |  Ghana | 696,179,857 $ |
55 |  Iraq | 470,176,421 $ |
56 |  Guatemala | 449,770,300 $ |
57 |  Kenya | 429,071,828 $ |
58 |  El Salvador | 377,640,100 $ |
59 |  Dominican Republic | 219,300,000 $ |
60 |  Equatorial Guinea | NaN $ |
61 |  Eritrea | NaN $ |
62 |  Estonia | NaN $ |
63 |  Honduras | 224,000,000 $ |
64 |  Jordan | 54,326,519 $ |
65 |  Gabon | 54,127,266 $ |
66 |  Guyana | 39,900,000 $ |
67 |  Eswatini | 18,479,630 $ |
68 |  Ethiopia | NaN $ |
69 |  Fiji | 44,085,652 $ |
70 |  Finland | NaN $ |
71 |  France | 9,548,928,351 $ |
72 |  Gambia | 13,272,212 $ |
73 |  Georgia | NaN $ |
74 |  Germany | NaN $ |
75 |  Greece | NaN $ |
76 |  Grenada | NaN $ |
77 |  Guinea | NaN $ |
78 |  Guinea-Bissau | NaN $ |
79 |  Haiti | NaN $ |
80 |  Hungary | NaN $ |
81 |  Iceland | NaN $ |
82 |  Indonesia | NaN $ |
83 |  Ireland | NaN $ |
84 |  Israel | NaN $ |
85 |  Italy | NaN $ |
86 |  Jamaica | NaN $ |
87 |  Japan | NaN $ |
88 |  Kazakhstan | NaN $ |
89 |  Kiribati | NaN $ |
90 |  Kuwait | NaN $ |
91 |  Kyrgyzstan | NaN $ |
92 |  Laos | NaN $ |
93 |  Latvia | NaN $ |
94 |  Lebanon | NaN $ |
95 |  Liberia | 64,124,700 $ |
96 |  Lesotho | 28,532,129 $ |
97 |  Libya | NaN $ |
98 |  Lithuania | NaN $ |
99 |  Luxembourg | NaN $ |
100 |  Mexico | 3,206,344,000 $ |
101 |  Malaysia | 1,043,695,675 $ |
102 |  Morocco | 733,524,355 $ |
103 |  Nepal | 520,417,270 $ |
104 |  Madagascar | 225,626,411 $ |
105 |  Mali | 199,021,103 $ |
106 |  Malawi | 103,920,042 $ |
107 |  Maldives | NaN $ |
108 |  Malta | NaN $ |
109 |  Mauritania | 60,933,889 $ |
110 |  Mauritius | NaN $ |
111 |  Mongolia | NaN $ |
112 |  Montenegro | NaN $ |
113 |  Mozambique | NaN $ |
114 |  Myanmar | NaN $ |
115 |  Namibia | NaN $ |
116 |  Nauru | NaN $ |
117 |  Netherlands | NaN $ |
118 |  New Zealand | NaN $ |
119 |  Nicaragua | NaN $ |
120 |  Niger | 443,516,385 $ |
121 |  Nigeria | NaN $ |
122 |  North Korea | NaN $ |
123 |  North Macedonia | NaN $ |
124 |  Norway | NaN $ |
125 |  Pakistan | 2,938,681,310 $ |
126 |  Philippines | 2,216,793,893 $ |
127 |  Peru | 958,485,358 $ |
128 |  Papua New Guinea | 208,086,012 $ |
129 |  Oman | 36,237,101 $ |
130 |  Panama | NaN $ |
131 |  Paraguay | NaN $ |
132 |  Poland | NaN $ |
133 |  Portugal | NaN $ |
134 |  Qatar | NaN $ |
135 |  Republic of Moldova | NaN $ |
136 |  Romania | NaN $ |
137 |  Russia | NaN $ |
138 |  Rwanda | 112,417,997 $ |
139 |  Saint Kitts and Nevis | NaN $ |
140 |  Saint Lucia | NaN $ |
141 |  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | NaN $ |
142 |  Samoa | NaN $ |
143 |  Sao Tome and Principe | NaN $ |
144 |  South Africa | 1,208,175,836 $ |
145 |  Senegal | 250,092,151 $ |
146 |  Saudi Arabia | 206,666,667 $ |
147 |  Serbia | NaN $ |
148 |  Seychelles | NaN $ |
149 |  Sierra Leone | 106,980,043 $ |
150 |  Singapore | NaN $ |
151 |  Slovakia | NaN $ |
152 |  Slovenia | NaN $ |
153 |  Solomon Islands | NaN $ |
154 |  Somalia | NaN $ |
155 |  South Korea | 1,667,192,525 $ |
156 |  South Sudan | NaN $ |
157 |  Spain | NaN $ |
158 |  Thailand | 1,744,211,495 $ |
159 |  Sri Lanka | 569,726,908 $ |
160 |  State of Palestine | NaN $ |
161 |  Sudan | NaN $ |
162 |  Venezuela | 647,200,000 $ |
163 |  Zimbabwe | 250,100,500 $ |
164 |  Zambia | 182,857,143 $ |
165 |  Togo | 107,850,591 $ |
166 |  Suriname | 18,950,000 $ |
167 |  Sweden | NaN $ |
168 |  Switzerland | NaN $ |
169 |  Syrian Arab Republic | NaN $ |
170 |  Tajikistan | NaN $ |
171 |  Tanzania | NaN $ |
172 |  Timor-Leste | NaN $ |
173 |  Tonga | NaN $ |
174 |  Trinidad and Tobago | NaN $ |
175 |  Turkey | 7,277,777,778 $ |
176 |  Tunisia | 213,523,810 $ |
177 |  Turkmenistan | NaN $ |
178 |  Tuvalu | NaN $ |
179 |  Uganda | 461,064,426 $ |
180 |  Ukraine | NaN $ |
181 |  United Arab Emirates | NaN $ |
182 |  United Kingdom | NaN $ |
183 |  United States | NaN $ |
184 |  Uruguay | NaN $ |
185 |  Uzbekistan | NaN $ |
186 |  Vanuatu | NaN $ |
187 |  Vietnam | NaN $ |
188 |  Yemen | NaN $ |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1Afghanistan
- #2Albania
- #3Algeria
- #4Angola
- #5Antigua and Barbuda
- #6Argentina
- #7Armenia
- #8Australia
- #9Austria
- #10Azerbaijan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #188Yemen
- #187Vietnam
- #186Vanuatu
- #185Uzbekistan
- #184Uruguay
- #183United States
- #182United Kingdom
- #181United Arab Emirates
- #180Ukraine
- #179Uganda
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Agriculture plays a crucial role in shaping the economic landscapes across the globe. The metric "Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country" for the year 1968 provides a fascinating glimpse into the economic significance of farming sectors in different nations. This measure helps us understand the contribution of agriculture to national economies, serving as a vital indicator for policy makers and investors. As we delve into this data, we will uncover the economic impact, regional patterns, and notable changes that defined global agriculture in 1968.
The Economic Significance of Agriculture in 1968
The year 1968 marked a period of significant agricultural contribution to GDP across many countries, underscoring the traditional reliance on farming as an economic backbone. China led the world with an astounding agriculture value added of $29.5 billion, highlighting its extensive agricultural sector. India followed closely with $22 billion, reflecting its agrarian economy. In contrast, developed nations like France still showed considerable agricultural GDP contributions, with $9.5 billion, reflecting diversified yet significant agricultural sectors. This data reveals agriculture’s pivotal role in both developing and developed economies, providing employment and sustaining livelihoods.
Regional Patterns and Disparities
Analyzing the data reveals stark regional disparities in agriculture's share of GDP. While Asian countries such as China and India dominated the top slots, South American countries like Brazil and Argentina also made significant contributions with $4 billion and $2.57 billion, respectively. On the other hand, African nations like Gambia and Botswana were at the lower end, with values like $13 million and $28 million. This disparity reflects differences in technological adoption, land availability, and economic diversification across regions, impacting agricultural productivity and GDP contributions.
Historical Context and Economic Influences
The late 1960s were a transformative period for global agriculture. The Green Revolution had begun to influence agricultural practices, particularly in regions like Asia and Latin America, leading to increased productivity. India’s increase by $657 million (3.1%) can be attributed to these technological advancements and policy shifts aimed at enhancing agricultural output. In contrast, countries like South Africa experienced a significant decrease of $121 million (-9.2%), possibly due to socio-political challenges and less emphasis on agricultural development during this era.
Policy Impacts and Governance
Government policies played a crucial role in shaping agricultural contributions to GDP. Countries like China and India benefited from government investments in irrigation and farming technology, enhancing agricultural output. Conversely, nations with political instability or less supportive policies, such as Zimbabwe, saw a decrease of $55 million (-18.1%). This highlights the importance of stable governance and agricultural policies in driving economic growth and sustaining agriculture's role in national economies.
Notable Year-over-Year Changes
The year-over-year changes in agriculture value added provide insight into dynamic economic conditions. Notable increases in countries like the Philippines (+19%) and Pakistan (+12.3%) reflect positive shifts in agricultural productivity and market expansion. However, countries like Peru and Chile faced declines, indicating challenges such as fluctuating commodity prices or adverse climatic conditions. These figures underscore the volatility and sensitivity of agricultural economies to both internal and external factors.
In conclusion, the agriculture value added as a share of GDP in 1968 serves as a telling indicator of economic priorities and challenges across the globe. It reflects the significant yet varied reliance on agriculture as a driver of growth, shaped by regional patterns, historical influences, and policy environments. Understanding these dimensions not only informs economic planning but also guides sustainable development strategies in agriculture-focused nations.
Insights by country
North Korea
In 1968, North Korea ranked 143rd out of 188 countries in terms of Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP, with a reported value of null $. This indicates a lack of available data on the agricultural sector's contribution to the national economy at that time, reflecting either severe limitations in data collection or significant challenges in the agricultural industry itself.
The agricultural sector in North Korea during the late 1960s was characterized by a state-controlled economy, heavy reliance on collective farming, and systemic issues stemming from post-war recovery efforts. Factors such as poor agricultural practices, inadequate technology, and harsh climatic conditions likely contributed to this low ranking and the inability to document agricultural output accurately.
Additionally, the period was marked by political isolation and limited access to international markets, further exacerbating economic challenges. Despite these hardships, agriculture was a vital part of North Korea's economy, with efforts to increase self-sufficiency and food production being a priority for the government.
Canada
In 1968, Canada ranked 89th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, reflecting a significant economic landscape during that period. The exact value for this metric was null $, indicating that the contribution of agriculture to the national economy was not quantified or was minimal in the context of the overall GDP.
This ranking highlights the gradual industrialization of the Canadian economy, where sectors such as manufacturing and services began to dominate, leading to a relative decrease in the agricultural sector's contribution. Several factors contributed to this trend, including urbanization, technological advancements in farming, and an increasing focus on resource extraction and industrial output.
Moreover, Canada's vast agricultural resources and varying climate zones allowed for diverse agricultural production, yet the shift towards a more industrialized economy was evident. By the late 20th century, agriculture would continue to play a critical role, but its proportion of GDP would decline as other sectors expanded rapidly.
Dominican Republic
In 1968, the Dominican Republic ranked 39th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with a reported value of $219,300,000. This significant contribution highlights the importance of agriculture in the country's economy during this period, reflecting a reliance on agricultural production for economic stability and growth.
The agricultural sector in the Dominican Republic was characterized by its export-oriented nature, particularly in products such as sugar, coffee, and tobacco, which were critical to the nation's economic development. The strong performance of agriculture can be attributed to favorable climatic conditions, a workforce skilled in agricultural practices, and historical reliance on agrarian economic models.
Additionally, the contribution of agriculture to GDP has profound implications for rural employment and livelihoods, as a large portion of the population depended on farming for their income. During this time, the sector not only supported local economies but also played a vital role in shaping the social and cultural fabric of the Dominican Republic.
Côte d'Ivoire
Côte d'Ivoire ranked 29th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP in the year 1968. The total value of agriculture contribution to the GDP was approximately $455,638,457, highlighting the sector's significant role in the nation's economy during this period.
This high ranking can be attributed to Côte d'Ivoire's robust agricultural sector, particularly its production of cash crops such as cocoa and coffee, which were crucial for export and economic growth. At this time, agriculture was the backbone of the Ivorian economy, employing a large portion of the population and driving rural development.
In addition, the favorable climate and fertile land in Côte d'Ivoire facilitated high agricultural productivity, attracting investment and enhancing the country's export capacity. This focus on agriculture laid the groundwork for future economic policies that aimed to diversify the economy while maintaining agriculture as a vital sector.
Colombia
In 1968, Colombia ranked 12th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, reflecting a significant reliance on the agricultural sector. The agriculture value added for that year was approximately $1,672,686,092, indicating that agriculture played a crucial role in the economy during this period.
The high percentage of GDP derived from agriculture in Colombia can be attributed to its diverse climate and fertile land, which allowed for the cultivation of various cash crops, including coffee, bananas, and flowers. Additionally, the socio-economic structure of the country during this era was heavily agrarian, with a large portion of the population engaged in farming activities.
Interestingly, Colombia has historically been known as one of the world's leading coffee producers, a fact that significantly contributed to its agricultural output. The prominence of agriculture in Colombia's economy has shifted over the decades as industrialization and services have gained traction, but the legacy of its agricultural past remains a vital aspect of its identity.
Angola
In 1968, Angola was ranked 69th out of 188 countries regarding agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with the actual value reported as null $. This indicates a significant lack of available data or negligible contribution of agriculture to the national economy during that period.
The agricultural sector in Angola has historically faced numerous challenges, including the impacts of colonialism, civil conflict, and insufficient infrastructure. These factors have hindered the development of agriculture, which traditionally plays a vital role in many economies, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
Despite its rich natural resources and favorable climate for farming, Angola's reliance on oil exports has overshadowed the agricultural sector. As a result, the country has struggled to modernize its agricultural practices and improve productivity, leading to a diminished role of agriculture in the overall economic framework.
Benin
In 1968, Benin ranked 48th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, contributing a total of $126,835,487 to its economy. This significant reliance on agriculture reflects the country's economic structure, where a substantial portion of the workforce was engaged in farming and related activities, which were pivotal for both subsistence and trade.
The high share of agriculture in GDP during this period can be attributed to several factors, including the country's agricultural practices, the predominance of cash crops such as cotton, and a limited industrial sector. Additionally, Benin's economy was heavily reliant on agriculture due to the lack of diversification, which was common in many developing nations at the time.
Benin's agricultural output not only supported local communities but also played a crucial role in the regional market, with agriculture being a primary source of export income. This reliance on agriculture has shaped Benin's economic policies and development strategies, underscoring the enduring importance of the sector in the country’s economic landscape.
Cameroon
In 1968, Cameroon ranked 34th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The value of agriculture contribution to the economy at that time was approximately $331,780,232, indicating a significant reliance on agricultural activities for economic sustenance.
This statistic reflects the importance of agriculture in the Cameroonian economy, which was characterized by a diverse range of crops and livestock. Factors contributing to this high share included favorable climatic conditions, a large rural population engaged in farming, and the historical significance of agriculture as a primary livelihood source for many Cameroonians.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that agriculture has traditionally been a cornerstone of economic development in Cameroon, providing employment and food security. The reliance on agriculture has also shaped policies and investment in rural infrastructure, facilitating trade and access to markets for agricultural products.
Cyprus
In 1968, Cyprus ranked 95th out of 188 countries regarding agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The actual value for agriculture's contribution to the GDP in this period is not available, indicating the potential underreporting or lack of comprehensive economic data at the time.
This ranking reflects Cyprus's economic structure during the late 1960s, a time when the island was increasingly focusing on industrialization and tourism, which began to overshadow traditional agricultural practices. Factors contributing to this shift included the expansion of infrastructure, rising foreign investments, and the development of the service sector.
Interestingly, agriculture has historically played a significant role in Cyprus's economy, especially in the production of citrus fruits and olives, which were key exports. However, as the economy diversified, the agricultural sector's relative importance diminished, a trend seen in many developing nations seeking modernization.
Albania
In 1968, Albania ranked 68th out of 188 countries in terms of Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this statistic in Albania during that year is null, indicating a lack of available data for precise quantification. This absence of data may reflect the country's economic conditions and the challenges in gathering comprehensive economic statistics during the period.
During the late 1960s, Albania was under a socialist regime, which heavily emphasized agricultural production as part of its economic strategy. The state-controlled agricultural sector aimed for self-sufficiency and collectivization, which may have influenced the overall contribution of agriculture to the GDP. The focus on agriculture was prevalent, but the actual economic output was constrained by limited technological advancement and infrastructural challenges.
Interestingly, agriculture has historically played a significant role in Albania’s economy, with many citizens engaged in subsistence farming. This reliance on agriculture is characteristic of many developing countries, where a significant portion of the population depends on agricultural activities for their livelihoods.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data