Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country 1966
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Afghanistan | NaN $ |
2 | Albania | NaN $ |
3 | Algeria | 314,330,214 $ |
4 | Angola | NaN $ |
5 | Antigua and Barbuda | NaN $ |
6 | Argentina | 2,942,857,061 $ |
7 | Armenia | NaN $ |
8 | Australia | NaN $ |
9 | Austria | NaN $ |
10 | Azerbaijan | NaN $ |
11 | Bahamas | NaN $ |
12 | Bahrain | NaN $ |
13 | Bangladesh | 3,474,042,133 $ |
14 | Barbados | NaN $ |
15 | Belarus | NaN $ |
16 | Belgium | NaN $ |
17 | Belize | NaN $ |
18 | China | 28,523,844,342 $ |
19 | Brazil | 3,603,489,774 $ |
20 | Côte d'Ivoire | 383,428,077 $ |
21 | Cameroon | 271,772,880 $ |
22 | Costa Rica | 150,052,830 $ |
23 | Benin | 136,764,160 $ |
24 | Bhutan | NaN $ |
25 | Bolivia | NaN $ |
26 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN $ |
27 | Colombia | 1,553,844,444 $ |
28 | Chile | 615,384,615 $ |
29 | Chad | 158,215,074 $ |
30 | Burkina Faso | 157,359,682 $ |
31 | Congo | 42,331,758 $ |
32 | Botswana | 20,223,152 $ |
33 | Brunei Darussalam | NaN $ |
34 | Bulgaria | NaN $ |
35 | Burundi | NaN $ |
36 | Cabo Verde | NaN $ |
37 | Cambodia | NaN $ |
38 | Canada | NaN $ |
39 | Central African Republic | 62,276,537 $ |
40 | Comoros | NaN $ |
41 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | NaN $ |
42 | Cook Islands | NaN $ |
43 | Croatia | NaN $ |
44 | Cuba | NaN $ |
45 | Cyprus | NaN $ |
46 | Czech Republic | NaN $ |
47 | Denmark | NaN $ |
48 | Djibouti | NaN $ |
49 | Dominica | NaN $ |
50 | India | 18,286,437,229 $ |
51 | Egypt | 1,317,504,856 $ |
52 | Iran | 1,184,288,799 $ |
53 | Ghana | 920,276,378 $ |
54 | Ecuador | 681,026,457 $ |
55 | Guatemala | 396,523,100 $ |
56 | El Salvador | 359,600,000 $ |
57 | Dominican Republic | 215,600,000 $ |
58 | Equatorial Guinea | NaN $ |
59 | Eritrea | NaN $ |
60 | Estonia | NaN $ |
61 | Honduras | 198,900,000 $ |
62 | Gabon | 61,869,492 $ |
63 | Guyana | 43,647,059 $ |
64 | Eswatini | 27,439,451 $ |
65 | Ethiopia | NaN $ |
66 | Fiji | 43,784,600 $ |
67 | Finland | NaN $ |
68 | France | 8,399,655,633 $ |
69 | Gambia | 14,252,114 $ |
70 | Georgia | NaN $ |
71 | Germany | NaN $ |
72 | Greece | NaN $ |
73 | Grenada | NaN $ |
74 | Guinea | NaN $ |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN $ |
76 | Haiti | NaN $ |
77 | Hungary | NaN $ |
78 | Iceland | NaN $ |
79 | Indonesia | NaN $ |
80 | Iraq | NaN $ |
81 | Ireland | NaN $ |
82 | Israel | NaN $ |
83 | Italy | NaN $ |
84 | Jamaica | NaN $ |
85 | Japan | NaN $ |
86 | Kenya | 404,179,838 $ |
87 | Jordan | 66,087,931 $ |
88 | Kazakhstan | NaN $ |
89 | Kiribati | NaN $ |
90 | Kuwait | NaN $ |
91 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN $ |
92 | Laos | NaN $ |
93 | Latvia | NaN $ |
94 | Lebanon | NaN $ |
95 | Liberia | 60,197,000 $ |
96 | Lesotho | 31,385,272 $ |
97 | Libya | NaN $ |
98 | Lithuania | NaN $ |
99 | Luxembourg | NaN $ |
100 | Mexico | 2,941,032,000 $ |
101 | Malaysia | 991,510,878 $ |
102 | Morocco | 604,090,505 $ |
103 | Madagascar | 204,138,240 $ |
104 | Malawi | 119,560,096 $ |
105 | Maldives | NaN $ |
106 | Mali | NaN $ |
107 | Malta | NaN $ |
108 | Mauritania | 54,602,096 $ |
109 | Mauritius | NaN $ |
110 | Mongolia | NaN $ |
111 | Montenegro | NaN $ |
112 | Mozambique | NaN $ |
113 | Myanmar | NaN $ |
114 | Namibia | NaN $ |
115 | Nauru | NaN $ |
116 | Nepal | 622,916,380 $ |
117 | Netherlands | NaN $ |
118 | New Zealand | NaN $ |
119 | Nicaragua | NaN $ |
120 | Niger | 469,658,638 $ |
121 | Nigeria | NaN $ |
122 | North Korea | NaN $ |
123 | North Macedonia | NaN $ |
124 | Norway | NaN $ |
125 | Pakistan | 2,220,075,661 $ |
126 | Philippines | 1,729,242,432 $ |
127 | Peru | 987,762,587 $ |
128 | Papua New Guinea | 161,608,243 $ |
129 | Oman | 39,764,772 $ |
130 | Panama | NaN $ |
131 | Paraguay | NaN $ |
132 | Poland | NaN $ |
133 | Portugal | NaN $ |
134 | Qatar | NaN $ |
135 | Republic of Moldova | NaN $ |
136 | Romania | NaN $ |
137 | Russia | NaN $ |
138 | Rwanda | 93,228,559 $ |
139 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | NaN $ |
140 | Saint Lucia | NaN $ |
141 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | NaN $ |
142 | Samoa | NaN $ |
143 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN $ |
144 | Saudi Arabia | NaN $ |
145 | South Korea | 1,299,462,192 $ |
146 | Senegal | 238,891,409 $ |
147 | Serbia | NaN $ |
148 | Seychelles | NaN $ |
149 | Sierra Leone | 116,269,953 $ |
150 | Singapore | NaN $ |
151 | Slovakia | NaN $ |
152 | Slovenia | NaN $ |
153 | Solomon Islands | NaN $ |
154 | Somalia | NaN $ |
155 | South Africa | 1,083,578,328 $ |
156 | South Sudan | NaN $ |
157 | Spain | NaN $ |
158 | Thailand | 1,763,274,043 $ |
159 | Sri Lanka | 502,368,235 $ |
160 | State of Palestine | NaN $ |
161 | Sudan | NaN $ |
162 | Venezuela | 538,777,778 $ |
163 | Zimbabwe | 270,791,600 $ |
164 | Zambia | 170,000,000 $ |
165 | Togo | 94,839,431 $ |
166 | Suriname | 15,700,000 $ |
167 | Sweden | NaN $ |
168 | Switzerland | NaN $ |
169 | Syrian Arab Republic | NaN $ |
170 | Tajikistan | NaN $ |
171 | Tanzania | NaN $ |
172 | Timor-Leste | NaN $ |
173 | Tonga | NaN $ |
174 | Trinidad and Tobago | NaN $ |
175 | Turkey | 6,655,555,556 $ |
176 | Tunisia | 185,904,762 $ |
177 | Turkmenistan | NaN $ |
178 | Tuvalu | NaN $ |
179 | Uganda | 444,677,871 $ |
180 | Ukraine | NaN $ |
181 | United Arab Emirates | NaN $ |
182 | United Kingdom | NaN $ |
183 | United States | NaN $ |
184 | Uruguay | NaN $ |
185 | Uzbekistan | NaN $ |
186 | Vanuatu | NaN $ |
187 | Vietnam | NaN $ |
188 | Yemen | NaN $ |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Afghanistan
- #2
Albania
- #3
Algeria
- #4
Angola
- #5
Antigua and Barbuda
- #6
Argentina
- #7
Armenia
- #8
Australia
- #9
Austria
- #10
Azerbaijan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #188
Yemen
- #187
Vietnam
- #186
Vanuatu
- #185
Uzbekistan
- #184
Uruguay
- #183
United States
- #182
United Kingdom
- #181
United Arab Emirates
- #180
Ukraine
- #179
Uganda
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
The metric "Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country" in 1966 offers a vital lens through which to view the economic landscapes of various nations. This statistic, representing the economic contributions of agriculture, sheds light on the importance of farming sectors within national economies. Understanding these figures is crucial for policymakers and investors as they navigate agricultural priorities and opportunities. In 1966, the global stage was characterized by varied agricultural outputs, influenced by geographical, cultural, and economic factors that dictated each country's reliance on agriculture.
The 1966 Economic Landscape and Agriculture
In 1966, the global economy was marked by distinct differences in agricultural contributions to GDP. Agriculture was not only a livelihood but also a primary economic driver in many developing countries, underscoring its role in economic growth and development. With China leading at $28,523,844,342, agriculture formed a substantial part of its economic backbone. Similarly, India, with a significant agriculture value added of $18,286,437,229, demonstrated the sector's critical role in supporting its large population. These figures reflect broader economic conditions where agrarian economies were heavily reliant on agriculture as a foundation for development and a major employment source.
Regional Comparisons and Variations
The diversity in agricultural value added across regions highlights stark contrasts between agricultural powerhouses and nations with minimal farming outputs. Despite its economic strength, France's value of $8,399,655,633 illustrates Europe's balanced approach to agriculture and industry. On the other hand, countries like Gambia and Suriname, with values of $14,252,114 and $15,700,000 respectively, underscore the varying scales and impacts of agriculture on national GDPs. These differences can often be traced back to geographical advantages, technological advancements in farming, and the level of industrialization achieved in each region.
Year-Over-Year Trends in Agricultural Value
Analyzing year-over-year changes, 1966 presented a mixed landscape of growth and decline in agricultural value added. Notably, China experienced a significant increase of $2,075,716,956, a 7.8% rise from the previous year, reflecting its robust agricultural policies and expanding production capacities. Conversely, India saw a decline of $4,821,206,282, or -20.9%, which could be attributed to various factors including climatic adversities or shifts towards industrialization. Thailand's remarkable increase of 25.9% highlights the country's investment in agricultural productivity and its strategic significance to the national economy during this period.
Economic Implications and Future Outlook
The data from 1966 underscores the economic implications of agriculture in shaping national policies and priorities. For countries like Bangladesh and Thailand, agriculture not only provided a substantial share of GDP but also supported socio-economic stability and development. The substantial differences in agricultural contributions also point to potential investment opportunities, particularly in regions where agriculture remains underdeveloped but promises high returns. As the world moved forward, these agricultural statistics from 1966 would serve as a baseline for understanding subsequent economic transformations and the shifting focus towards diversified economies.
Correlation with Development and Industrialization
The correlation between agricultural value added and levels of industrialization reveals important insights into national development strategies. In rapidly industrializing countries such as Argentina and India, a decline in agriculture's share of GDP often accompanies broader economic diversification. This trend signals a transition from agrarian economies towards industrial and service sectors, reflecting a global movement towards modernization and economic complexity. The statistics from 1966 thus highlight the pivotal role of agriculture as both a current economic pillar and a stepping stone towards diversified and resilient economies.
In conclusion, the "Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country" metric from 1966 offers a nuanced understanding of global economic dynamics. It highlights the crucial role of agriculture in both economic sustenance and developmental transitions, while also posing significant questions about future trends and policies. As nations continue to evolve, these historical insights provide indispensable knowledge that can guide future strategies in agriculture and beyond.
Insights by country
Solomon Islands
In 1966, the Solomon Islands ranked 164th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The actual value for agriculture's contribution to the GDP during this year is recorded as null $, indicating a lack of data or minimal agricultural economic activity reported.
This ranking reflects the challenges faced by the Solomon Islands in developing a robust agricultural sector. The economy has historically been reliant on subsistence farming and the export of cash crops such as copra and cocoa, but limited infrastructure and access to markets have hindered growth in this area.
Factors contributing to this low agricultural value added include the geographical isolation of the islands, vulnerability to natural disasters, and a focus on other economic activities such as fishing and forestry. Additionally, the social and economic structures of the time may have prioritized immediate subsistence needs over measurable economic contributions from agriculture.
Fiji
In 1966, Fiji ranked 55th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with a reported value of $43,784,600. This statistic highlights the significant role that agriculture played in the Fijian economy during this period, underscoring its importance as a source of livelihood and economic activity.
The prominence of agriculture in Fiji's GDP can be attributed to several factors, including the country's reliance on agricultural exports such as sugar, copra, and tropical fruits, which were vital for both domestic consumption and international trade. Additionally, traditional farming practices and subsistence agriculture remained prevalent, further solidifying agriculture's contribution to the national economy.
Interestingly, Fiji's agricultural sector has historically been a cornerstone of its economy, employing a substantial portion of the population and influencing rural development. As of the mid-20th century, the sector not only provided food security but also served as a critical driver for economic growth within the Pacific island nation.
Seychelles
In 1966, Seychelles ranked 160th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The actual value for this metric was null, indicating that agriculture contributed minimally to the nation's economic output during this period.
This low agricultural contribution can be attributed to several factors, including the island nation's limited arable land, reliance on tourism, and a growing focus on the fishing industry. With a small population and geographical constraints, Seychelles has historically prioritized sectors that yield higher economic returns, such as tourism and services, over traditional agriculture.
Interestingly, while agriculture was not a significant part of the economy in 1966, it is essential to note that the country has made efforts in recent decades to diversify its economy and enhance food security, reflecting changing priorities in response to global economic trends.
Uganda
In 1966, Uganda ranked 27th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with an estimated value of $444,677,871. This indicates that agriculture was a significant contributor to the economy, reflecting the country's reliance on agricultural activities for economic development and sustenance.
The high share of agriculture in Uganda's GDP during this period can be attributed to several factors, including the country's favorable climate for farming, a predominantly agrarian population, and the lack of industrial diversification. The economy was largely dependent on subsistence farming, with crops such as coffee, tea, and matoke serving as vital sources of income and export earnings.
Additionally, this statistic highlights the historical context of Uganda's economic landscape in the mid-20th century, prior to the political and social upheaval that would later impact agricultural productivity and economic stability. Despite the challenges faced, agriculture remained a cornerstone of Uganda's economy, underscoring its importance in shaping the livelihoods of the majority of the population.
Samoa
In 1966, Samoa ranked 156th out of 188 countries regarding agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with the actual value reported as null dollars. This ranking indicates that the agriculture sector's contribution to the national economy was minimal or unmeasured at that time.
The low agricultural value added can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic isolation, limited arable land, and reliance on subsistence farming. Additionally, the economy may have been transitioning towards more service-oriented sectors, impacting the overall significance of agriculture in GDP calculations.
Historically, Samoa's economy has been heavily dependent on agriculture, particularly crops such as taro and coconut. Despite the challenges faced in the 1960s, agriculture remains a vital part of Samoan culture and livelihoods, highlighting the enduring importance of this sector in the nation's identity.
United Arab Emirates
In 1966, the United Arab Emirates ranked 181 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with a reported value of null dollars. This low ranking reflects the country's nascent agricultural sector during a period when it was primarily focused on developing its oil and gas industries, which would later dominate its economy.
The minimal contribution of agriculture to the GDP can be attributed to several factors, including the arid climate of the region, which poses significant challenges for agricultural production, and the country's limited arable land. Additionally, the discovery of oil in the late 1950s redirected investment and labor away from traditional agricultural practices towards the burgeoning oil industry.
During this period, the UAE's economy was heavily reliant on oil exports, which would ultimately lead to rapid economic transformation in the following decades. Despite the challenges faced in agriculture, the UAE has since made significant investments in agricultural technology and sustainable practices to enhance food security and diversify its economy.
Greece
In 1966, Greece was ranked 104th out of 188 countries in terms of Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP. The specific value for Greece during this period was null, indicating a lack of available data or reporting on this statistic.
This ranking reflects the economic structure of Greece at the time, where agriculture was a significant sector but faced various challenges, including modernization pressures and limited industrial development. The agricultural sector was crucial for the Greek economy, employing a substantial portion of the workforce and contributing to rural livelihoods.
Factors influencing this statistic included the ongoing transitions in the Greek economy, particularly post-World War II recovery, which prompted shifts towards manufacturing and services. Additionally, Greece's diverse climate allowed for the cultivation of various crops, but the sector struggled with issues such as land fragmentation and outdated farming techniques.
Kyrgyzstan
In 1966, Kyrgyzstan was ranked 121 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this metric during that year is recorded as null, indicating a lack of available data or possibly a negligible contribution of agriculture to the overall economic output at that time.
This statistic reflects the broader economic landscape of Kyrgyzstan in the mid-20th century, a period marked by the legacy of Soviet agricultural policies which often prioritized industrialization over agrarian development. The country’s mountainous terrain and climatic conditions also posed challenges for agricultural productivity, limiting the types of crops that could be cultivated effectively.
Moreover, the reliance on collective farming systems under the Soviet regime may have contributed to inefficiencies in agricultural output, which could explain the low share of agriculture in GDP. Despite these challenges, agriculture has historically been a significant sector in Kyrgyzstan, with livestock and crop production playing vital roles in the livelihoods of many citizens.
Uzbekistan
In 1966, Uzbekistan ranked 185th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP. The specific value for agriculture's contribution to GDP during this period was null, indicating that the sector's economic impact was either not recorded or negligible in the national accounts.
This low ranking can be attributed to several factors, including the Soviet Union's centralized economic planning, which often prioritized industrialization over agricultural development. Additionally, the region faced challenges such as limited technological advancement in farming practices and infrastructure, which hindered agricultural productivity.
Despite these challenges, Uzbekistan has historically been one of the largest producers of cotton in the world, a legacy of Soviet agricultural policies. The reliance on cotton cultivation has had long-lasting implications for the country's economy and environment, influencing its agricultural landscape well beyond 1966.
Italy
In 1966, Italy ranked 115th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with the specific value being null $. This indicates that the contribution of agriculture to the national economy was relatively low compared to other sectors at that time, reflecting a broader trend of industrialization in post-World War II Italy.
The decline in agriculture's share of GDP can be attributed to several factors, including a significant shift towards manufacturing and services, urbanization, and increasing mechanization in agricultural practices. Additionally, Italy's focus on developing its industrial base and catering to a growing consumer market likely diverted resources and labor away from traditional agricultural activities.
Interestingly, the transformation of the Italian economy during this period laid the groundwork for the country to become one of the leading agricultural producers in Europe by the late 20th century, particularly known for its wine, olive oil, and various regional cuisines that highlight the importance of agriculture in Italian culture and identity.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data