Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country 1967
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | ||
|---|---|---|
1 | Afghanistan | NaN $ |
2 | Albania | NaN $ |
3 | Algeria | 392,912,763 $ |
4 | Angola | NaN $ |
5 | Antigua and Barbuda | NaN $ |
6 | Argentina | 2,420,909,129 $ |
7 | Armenia | NaN $ |
8 | Australia | NaN $ |
9 | Austria | NaN $ |
10 | Azerbaijan | NaN $ |
11 | Bahamas | NaN $ |
12 | Bahrain | NaN $ |
13 | Bangladesh | 4,051,301,631 $ |
14 | Barbados | NaN $ |
15 | Belarus | NaN $ |
16 | Belgium | NaN $ |
17 | Belize | NaN $ |
18 | China | 29,011,292,550 $ |
19 | Brazil | 3,980,945,162 $ |
20 | Côte d'Ivoire | 376,421,422 $ |
21 | Cameroon | 290,809,637 $ |
22 | Costa Rica | 162,279,245 $ |
23 | Benin | 128,861,320 $ |
24 | Bhutan | NaN $ |
25 | Bolivia | NaN $ |
26 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | NaN $ |
27 | Colombia | 1,622,698,477 $ |
28 | Chile | 568,627,451 $ |
29 | Chad | 179,501,005 $ |
30 | Burkina Faso | 150,605,839 $ |
31 | Congo | 47,154,292 $ |
32 | Botswana | 24,198,047 $ |
33 | Brunei Darussalam | NaN $ |
34 | Bulgaria | NaN $ |
35 | Burundi | NaN $ |
36 | Cabo Verde | NaN $ |
37 | Cambodia | NaN $ |
38 | Canada | NaN $ |
39 | Central African Republic | 60,568,884 $ |
40 | Comoros | NaN $ |
41 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | NaN $ |
42 | Cook Islands | NaN $ |
43 | Croatia | NaN $ |
44 | Cuba | NaN $ |
45 | Cyprus | NaN $ |
46 | Czech Republic | NaN $ |
47 | Denmark | NaN $ |
48 | Djibouti | NaN $ |
49 | Dominica | NaN $ |
50 | India | 21,358,106,520 $ |
51 | Egypt | 1,389,429,456 $ |
52 | Iran | 1,247,838,568 $ |
53 | Ecuador | 725,362,710 $ |
54 | Ghana | 702,824,817 $ |
55 | Guatemala | 398,450,600 $ |
56 | El Salvador | 375,880,000 $ |
57 | Dominican Republic | 210,400,000 $ |
58 | Equatorial Guinea | NaN $ |
59 | Eritrea | NaN $ |
60 | Estonia | NaN $ |
61 | Honduras | 211,550,000 $ |
62 | Gabon | 65,446,946 $ |
63 | Guyana | 47,117,647 $ |
64 | Eswatini | 20,579,588 $ |
65 | Ethiopia | NaN $ |
66 | Fiji | 43,143,106 $ |
67 | Finland | NaN $ |
68 | France | 9,045,374,178 $ |
69 | Gambia | 15,065,657 $ |
70 | Georgia | NaN $ |
71 | Germany | NaN $ |
72 | Greece | NaN $ |
73 | Grenada | NaN $ |
74 | Guinea | NaN $ |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | NaN $ |
76 | Haiti | NaN $ |
77 | Hungary | NaN $ |
78 | Iceland | NaN $ |
79 | Indonesia | NaN $ |
80 | Iraq | NaN $ |
81 | Ireland | NaN $ |
82 | Israel | NaN $ |
83 | Italy | NaN $ |
84 | Jamaica | NaN $ |
85 | Japan | NaN $ |
86 | Kenya | 414,847,834 $ |
87 | Jordan | 99,411,929 $ |
88 | Kazakhstan | NaN $ |
89 | Kiribati | NaN $ |
90 | Kuwait | NaN $ |
91 | Kyrgyzstan | NaN $ |
92 | Laos | NaN $ |
93 | Latvia | NaN $ |
94 | Lebanon | NaN $ |
95 | Liberia | 62,843,900 $ |
96 | Lesotho | 27,283,774 $ |
97 | Libya | NaN $ |
98 | Lithuania | NaN $ |
99 | Luxembourg | NaN $ |
100 | Mexico | 3,119,800,000 $ |
101 | Malaysia | 1,007,646,936 $ |
102 | Morocco | 662,187,531 $ |
103 | Nepal | 557,684,722 $ |
104 | Madagascar | 218,587,244 $ |
105 | Mali | 170,028,650 $ |
106 | Malawi | 118,750,764 $ |
107 | Maldives | NaN $ |
108 | Malta | NaN $ |
109 | Mauritania | 58,203,479 $ |
110 | Mauritius | NaN $ |
111 | Mongolia | NaN $ |
112 | Montenegro | NaN $ |
113 | Mozambique | NaN $ |
114 | Myanmar | NaN $ |
115 | Namibia | NaN $ |
116 | Nauru | NaN $ |
117 | Netherlands | NaN $ |
118 | New Zealand | NaN $ |
119 | Nicaragua | NaN $ |
120 | Niger | 470,612,022 $ |
121 | Nigeria | NaN $ |
122 | North Korea | NaN $ |
123 | North Macedonia | NaN $ |
124 | Norway | NaN $ |
125 | Pakistan | 2,616,547,732 $ |
126 | Philippines | 1,863,547,162 $ |
127 | Peru | 1,044,329,785 $ |
128 | Papua New Guinea | 185,351,103 $ |
129 | Oman | 39,491,853 $ |
130 | Panama | NaN $ |
131 | Paraguay | NaN $ |
132 | Poland | NaN $ |
133 | Portugal | NaN $ |
134 | Qatar | NaN $ |
135 | Republic of Moldova | NaN $ |
136 | Romania | NaN $ |
137 | Russia | NaN $ |
138 | Rwanda | 105,072,005 $ |
139 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | NaN $ |
140 | Saint Lucia | NaN $ |
141 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | NaN $ |
142 | Samoa | NaN $ |
143 | Sao Tome and Principe | NaN $ |
144 | Saudi Arabia | NaN $ |
145 | South Korea | 1,409,276,445 $ |
146 | Senegal | 218,696,710 $ |
147 | Serbia | NaN $ |
148 | Seychelles | NaN $ |
149 | Sierra Leone | 119,371,948 $ |
150 | Singapore | NaN $ |
151 | Slovakia | NaN $ |
152 | Slovenia | NaN $ |
153 | Solomon Islands | NaN $ |
154 | Somalia | NaN $ |
155 | South Africa | 1,329,973,401 $ |
156 | South Sudan | NaN $ |
157 | Spain | NaN $ |
158 | Thailand | 1,648,899,053 $ |
159 | Sri Lanka | 559,275,597 $ |
160 | State of Palestine | NaN $ |
161 | Sudan | NaN $ |
162 | Venezuela | 582,533,333 $ |
163 | Zimbabwe | 305,343,600 $ |
164 | Zambia | 175,714,286 $ |
165 | Togo | 102,438,654 $ |
166 | Suriname | 17,250,000 $ |
167 | Sweden | NaN $ |
168 | Switzerland | NaN $ |
169 | Syrian Arab Republic | NaN $ |
170 | Tajikistan | NaN $ |
171 | Tanzania | NaN $ |
172 | Timor-Leste | NaN $ |
173 | Tonga | NaN $ |
174 | Trinidad and Tobago | NaN $ |
175 | Turkey | 6,966,666,667 $ |
176 | Tunisia | 176,952,381 $ |
177 | Turkmenistan | NaN $ |
178 | Tuvalu | NaN $ |
179 | Uganda | 443,557,423 $ |
180 | Ukraine | NaN $ |
181 | United Arab Emirates | NaN $ |
182 | United Kingdom | NaN $ |
183 | United States | NaN $ |
184 | Uruguay | NaN $ |
185 | Uzbekistan | NaN $ |
186 | Vanuatu | NaN $ |
187 | Vietnam | NaN $ |
188 | Yemen | NaN $ |
↑Top 10 Countries
- #1
Afghanistan
- #2
Albania
- #3
Algeria
- #4
Angola
- #5
Antigua and Barbuda
- #6
Argentina
- #7
Armenia
- #8
Australia
- #9
Austria
- #10
Azerbaijan
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
↓Bottom 10 Countries
- #188
Yemen
- #187
Vietnam
- #186
Vanuatu
- #185
Uzbekistan
- #184
Uruguay
- #183
United States
- #182
United Kingdom
- #181
United Arab Emirates
- #180
Ukraine
- #179
Uganda
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country in 1967 provides a crucial snapshot of the economic reliance on agriculture across the globe. This statistic reflects the contribution of agricultural sectors to national economies, shedding light on the varying importance of farming across different countries. In a year marked by significant global dynamics, understanding how agriculture shaped national economies can inform both historical economic perspectives and current investment strategies.
Economic Impact of Agriculture in 1967
In 1967, agriculture's role in national economies was essential, particularly for developing countries. With the highest agriculture value added in China at $29,011,292,550, the sheer size of the agricultural sector underscored its critical importance. India followed with a substantial $21,358,106,520, reflecting its agrarian-based economy's significant GDP contribution. These figures highlight the pivotal role of agriculture in supporting large populations and fueling economic growth in populous nations. In contrast, countries like Gambia, with a value of $15,065,657, demonstrated a smaller-scale agricultural impact, often signifying either a diversified economy or less agricultural dependency.
Regional Contrasts and Economic Dependencies
The variations in agriculture value added across different regions present a fascinating picture of economic dependency. In South Asia, both India and Bangladesh ($4,051,301,631) showed strong agricultural sectors driven by favorable climates and large rural populations. Meanwhile, in Latin America, Brazil and Mexico's values—$3,980,945,162 and $3,119,800,000, respectively—illustrate significant contributions to their GDPs from agriculture, although with more diversified economies than their Asian counterparts. European nations like France also showed substantial figures, with agriculture adding $9,045,374,178, highlighting a diversified yet still significant reliance on agricultural productivity.
Development and Agricultural Contributions
Exploring agriculture's share of GDP provides insights into a country's development stage. Often, a high percentage indicates a developing country with an economy heavily reliant on agriculture. In Africa, countries such as Botswana ($24,198,047) and Lesotho ($27,283,774) presented smaller agricultural contributions, which could reflect either limited agricultural infrastructure or a shift towards other economic sectors. In developed countries, agriculture contributes less to GDP due to diversified economies, as seen in France, where significant agricultural output is part of a well-rounded economic structure.
Significant Year-over-Year Changes
The year 1967 also saw notable changes from the previous year in agricultural value added. India experienced the most significant increase, with an additional $3,071,669,291 (16.8%), driven by policy reforms and technological advancements in agriculture. Similarly, Bangladesh's increase by $577,259,498 (16.6%) indicates a strengthening agricultural sector possibly spurred by improved irrigation and farming techniques. Conversely, Argentina saw a decrease of $521,947,932 (-17.7%), reflecting economic challenges or shifts towards industrialization. Such changes are pivotal in understanding the dynamic economic environments of the time.
Global Economic Trends and Agricultural Influence
The global economic landscape in 1967 was influenced by several factors, including technological advancements, policy decisions, and climatic conditions. As countries strived for industrialization and modernization, the role of agriculture was both a foundation and a platform for further economic development. The disparities in agriculture's contribution to GDP across different regions reflect these broader economic transitions. Furthermore, international economic policies and global trade dynamics would have influenced these statistics, as nations navigated post-war economic realities and growth strategies.
In summary, the Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country in 1967 provides a window into the economic essence of nations, highlighting agriculture's foundational role, especially in developing countries. This metric not only underscores agriculture's importance in historical economic contexts but also serves as a guide for understanding evolving global economic trends and policy impacts. By examining these patterns, we gain crucial insights into the agricultural sector's enduring influence on national and global economies.
Insights by country
Tuvalu
In 1967, Tuvalu ranked 179 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, reflecting a significant economic reliance on non-agricultural sectors. The actual value for this metric in Tuvalu was null $, indicating that agriculture contributed minimally to the country's GDP during this period.
This low contribution can be attributed to Tuvalu's geographical characteristics, being a small island nation with limited arable land and resources for extensive agricultural development. The economy was predominantly driven by subsistence farming and fishing, with external factors such as reliance on imports and remittances from Tuvaluans working abroad playing a more substantial role in the economy.
Additionally, Tuvalu's isolation and small population further limited agricultural output, making it challenging to develop a robust agricultural sector. This situation underscores the broader challenges faced by many small island developing states, where economic diversification is often constrained by environmental and logistical factors.
Austria
In 1967, Austria ranked 71st out of 188 countries in terms of Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP. The specific value for this statistic was recorded as null $, indicating either a lack of data or that agriculture's contribution was minimal or possibly unmeasured during that year.
The relatively low ranking suggests that Austria's economy was transitioning towards industrialization and services, with agriculture playing a diminishing role in the national economic structure. This shift can be attributed to several factors, including urbanization, technological advancements in farming practices, and a growing emphasis on manufacturing and service sectors.
Historically, Austria has a strong agricultural tradition, particularly in dairy and wine production. However, by the late 20th century, the focus on agriculture began to decline, reflecting broader trends seen in many developed nations as they move toward more diversified economies.
Honduras
In 1967, Honduras ranked 37th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of its gross domestic product (GDP), contributing approximately $211,550,000 to the economy. This significant contribution underscores the importance of agriculture in the nation's economic structure during that period.
The prominence of agriculture in Honduras's economy can be attributed to its favorable climate and fertile land, which supported the cultivation of cash crops such as coffee, bananas, and tobacco. These crops were not only vital for domestic consumption but also played a crucial role in exports, establishing Honduras as a key player in the global agricultural market.
During the 1960s, agricultural practices in Honduras were heavily influenced by foreign investments and multinational corporations, particularly in the banana industry, which facilitated economic growth but also led to social and economic disparities. Overall, the reliance on agriculture reflected both the potential for economic development and the vulnerabilities faced by the country in adapting to global market changes.
Mali
Mali ranked 43rd out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP in the year 1967. The agriculture sector contributed approximately $170,028,650 to the national economy, underscoring its critical role in the country's economic structure.
This high dependence on agriculture can be attributed to Mali's geography, which includes vast arable lands primarily used for the cultivation of crops such as millet, sorghum, and cotton. The majority of the population relies on subsistence farming, which is often vulnerable to climatic variations and economic shifts.
Additionally, during this period, Mali was navigating post-colonial development challenges and seeking to modernize its agricultural practices, which had significant implications for productivity and economic growth. The importance of agriculture in Mali's economy has persisted over the decades, reflecting the resilience and adaptability of the agricultural sector in the face of various socio-economic changes.
Saint Kitts and Nevis
In 1967, Saint Kitts and Nevis ranked 153 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with the actual value reported as null dollars. This statistic indicates that agriculture played a minimal role in the economic structure of the country during that period, reflecting the early stages of its economic development.
The low contribution of agriculture to GDP in Saint Kitts and Nevis can be attributed to several factors, including a historical reliance on sugar production, which had begun to decline by the 1960s due to global market changes. Additionally, the country's small land area and limited agricultural diversification have constrained its agricultural output and economic impact.
Throughout the years, the economy of Saint Kitts and Nevis has shifted towards tourism and services, which have become the dominant sectors. This transition underscores the challenges faced by small island nations in sustaining agricultural productivity while adapting to global economic trends.
Montenegro
In 1967, Montenegro ranked 133 out of 188 countries regarding agriculture value added as a share of GDP, reflecting a significant economic reliance on agriculture. The specific value of agriculture's contribution to GDP for this year is recorded as null $, indicating a lack of available data or a minimal impact on the overall economy at that time.
This statistic is indicative of Montenegro's economic landscape during the late 1960s, a period characterized by the broader context of the former Yugoslavia's economic structure, where industrialization efforts were prioritized over agricultural development. Factors contributing to this ranking may include urban migration, which led to a decline in agricultural labor, as well as the emphasis on industrial sectors that overshadowed traditional farming practices.
Historically, Montenegro has had fertile areas suitable for agriculture, particularly in producing fruits, vegetables, and livestock. However, the shifting focus towards industrialization in the mid-20th century diminished the relative importance of agriculture in the national economy. This trend aligns with the broader regional patterns observed in many post-war European economies transitioning towards industrial growth.
Peru
In 1967, Peru ranked 17th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, reflecting the significant role that agriculture played in its economy during that period. The agriculture sector contributed approximately $1,044,329,785 to the country's GDP, highlighting its importance as a foundational element of Peru's economic structure.
This high ranking can be attributed to several factors, including Peru's diverse climatic zones, which allow for the cultivation of a wide variety of crops such as potatoes, corn, and coffee. Additionally, the reliance on agricultural exports was crucial for the Peruvian economy, as it provided essential foreign exchange earnings and employment for a large segment of the population.
Moreover, during the 1960s, Peru was undergoing agrarian reform aimed at redistributing land and increasing agricultural productivity. This shift in policy was designed to modernize the agricultural sector and improve the livelihoods of rural farmers, further solidifying agriculture's critical role in the national economy.
El Salvador
In 1967, El Salvador ranked 32nd out of 188 countries in terms of Agriculture Value Added as a share of GDP. The agricultural sector contributed approximately $375,880,000 to the nation's economy, reflecting its significant role during this period.
This statistic underscores the importance of agriculture in El Salvador's economy, as it was a primary source of income and employment for a large portion of the population. The country's economy was heavily reliant on agricultural exports, particularly coffee, which dominated the export market and was a critical driver of economic growth.
Several factors contributed to this high value-added share, including the favorable climatic conditions for crop production and the traditional reliance on agriculture as a means of livelihood. However, the agricultural sector also faced challenges such as land concentration, social inequality, and vulnerability to natural disasters, which could impact overall productivity and economic stability.
Malawi
In 1967, Malawi ranked 48th out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of GDP, with a reported value of $118,750,764. This statistic highlights the critical role that agriculture played in Malawi's economy during this period, reflecting the sector's prominence in contributing to the national income.
The high dependency on agriculture can be attributed to several factors, including the country's geographic conditions, which are favorable for farming, and a substantial portion of the population engaged in subsistence farming. The agricultural sector provided livelihoods for many Malawians, primarily through staple crops such as maize, which is essential for food security and economic stability.
Moreover, during the 1960s, Malawi was still in the early stages of its post-colonial development, and the economy was largely agrarian, with limited industrial diversification. As a result, the economic policies of the time prioritized agricultural production, which influenced this significant share of GDP attributed to the sector.
United Arab Emirates
In 1967, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) ranked 181 out of 188 countries in terms of agriculture value added as a share of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP), with a reported value of null $. This statistic highlights the minimal contribution of the agricultural sector to the country's overall economy during this period.
The low agricultural output can be attributed to several factors, including the UAE's arid climate, limited arable land, and a historical reliance on oil and gas revenues, which overshadowed agricultural development. The harsh desert environment posed significant challenges for traditional farming practices, leading to a focus on other economic activities.
In contrast, as of the early 21st century, the UAE has made efforts to diversify its economy, and while agriculture remains a small part of GDP, initiatives have been launched to improve food security and sustainable farming practices, reflecting a growing recognition of the importance of agriculture in the broader economic landscape.
Data Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that leads international efforts to defeat hunger.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Country in Current US Dollars
Discover the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by country in current US dollars, a key indicator of economic performance. This statistic reveals the financial health and growth potential of nations, making it essential for investors and policymakers.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data