Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2020
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qatar | 87.105 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 84.589 % | |
3 | Solomon Islands | 83.518 % | |
4 | Tanzania | 82.837 % | |
5 | Cambodia | 82.238 % | |
6 | North Korea | 80.618 % | |
7 | Nigeria | 79.314 % | |
8 | United Arab Emirates | 78.781 % | |
9 | Burundi | 78.546 % | |
10 | Mozambique | 78.149 % | |
11 | Uganda | 78.009 % | |
12 | Eritrea | 77.509 % | |
13 | Liberia | 76.093 % | |
14 | Burkina Faso | 75.189 % | |
15 | Benin | 74.78 % | |
16 | Vietnam | 74.367 % | |
17 | Niger | 74.144 % | |
18 | Iceland | 73.555 % | |
19 | Angola | 73.319 % | |
20 | South Sudan | 73.234 % | |
21 | Central African Republic | 72.726 % | |
22 | Bolivia | 72.264 % | |
23 | Paraguay | 70.117 % | |
24 | New Zealand | 69.863 % | |
25 | Republic of Moldova | 69.68 % | |
26 | Ethiopia | 69.391 % | |
27 | Bahrain | 69.226 % | |
28 | Kazakhstan | 69.2 % | |
29 | Kuwait | 69.199 % | |
30 | Peru | 68.924 % | |
31 | Singapore | 68.712 % | |
32 | China, Macao SAR | 68.672 % | |
33 | Malawi | 68.264 % | |
34 | Bahamas | 68.082 % | |
35 | Switzerland | 67.984 % | |
36 | Bhutan | 67.827 % | |
37 | Indonesia | 67.401 % | |
38 | Azerbaijan | 67.223 % | |
39 | Kenya | 67.081 % | |
40 | Thailand | 67.021 % | |
41 | Netherlands | 66.544 % | |
42 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.523 % | |
43 | Panama | 66.4 % | |
44 | Oman | 65.957 % | |
45 | Timor-Leste | 65.922 % | |
46 | Cameroon | 65.916 % | |
47 | Mali | 65.916 % | |
48 | Cyprus | 65.734 % | |
49 | China | 65.721 % | |
50 | Norway | 65.678 % | |
51 | Malaysia | 65.473 % | |
52 | Haiti | 65.199 % | |
53 | Australia | 65.028 % | |
54 | Congo | 64.941 % | |
55 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 64.893 % | |
56 | Jamaica | 64.834 % | |
57 | Zimbabwe | 64.665 % | |
58 | Nicaragua | 64.363 % | |
59 | Sweden | 64.152 % | |
60 | Canada | 64.097 % | |
61 | Belarus | 64.03 % | |
62 | Brunei Darussalam | 63.954 % | |
63 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 63.44 % | |
64 | Mongolia | 63.432 % | |
65 | Colombia | 63.415 % | |
66 | Israel | 63.406 % | |
67 | Georgia | 63.399 % | |
68 | Barbados | 63.104 % | |
69 | Estonia | 63.039 % | |
70 | Laos | 62.912 % | |
71 | Rwanda | 62.66 % | |
72 | Lithuania | 62.658 % | |
73 | United Kingdom | 62.573 % | |
74 | Guinea-Bissau | 62.502 % | |
75 | Saudi Arabia | 62.414 % | |
76 | South Korea | 62.274 % | |
77 | Denmark | 62.144 % | |
78 | Japan | 61.947 % | |
79 | Ghana | 61.615 % | |
80 | Latvia | 61.565 % | |
81 | United States | 61.556 % | |
82 | Malta | 61.478 % | |
83 | Russia | 61.389 % | |
84 | Botswana | 61.298 % | |
85 | Armenia | 61.259 % | |
86 | Uruguay | 61.103 % | |
87 | Ireland | 61.09 % | |
88 | Zambia | 60.872 % | |
89 | Costa Rica | 60.629 % | |
90 | Brazil | 60.479 % | |
91 | Germany | 60.478 % | |
92 | Dominican Republic | 60.365 % | |
93 | Austria | 60.363 % | |
94 | Myanmar | 60.151 % | |
95 | Luxembourg | 60.103 % | |
96 | Ecuador | 60.033 % | |
97 | Bangladesh | 59.77 % | |
98 | Honduras | 59.495 % | |
99 | Czech Republic | 59.46 % | |
100 | Chad | 59.374 % | |
101 | Albania | 59.367 % | |
102 | Guam | 59.182 % | |
103 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 58.975 % | |
104 | Slovakia | 58.906 % | |
105 | Finland | 58.848 % | |
106 | Guatemala | 58.76 % | |
107 | Trinidad and Tobago | 58.637 % | |
108 | Hungary | 58.446 % | |
109 | Maldives | 58.304 % | |
110 | Vanuatu | 58.039 % | |
111 | Slovenia | 57.811 % | |
112 | New Caledonia | 57.677 % | |
113 | Portugal | 57.587 % | |
114 | Togo | 57.436 % | |
115 | Poland | 57.397 % | |
116 | Kyrgyzstan | 57.31 % | |
117 | Lesotho | 57.107 % | |
118 | Equatorial Guinea | 57.001 % | |
119 | El Salvador | 56.52 % | |
120 | Mexico | 56.426 % | |
121 | Spain | 56.401 % | |
122 | Chile | 56.358 % | |
123 | Argentina | 56.023 % | |
124 | Namibia | 55.981 % | |
125 | Bulgaria | 55.878 % | |
126 | Mauritius | 55.714 % | |
127 | Uzbekistan | 55.517 % | |
128 | Ukraine | 55.087 % | |
129 | Philippines | 54.746 % | |
130 | Belize | 54.68 % | |
131 | French Polynesia | 54.459 % | |
132 | France | 54.271 % | |
133 | Fiji | 53.999 % | |
134 | Saint Lucia | 53.739 % | |
135 | Comoros | 53.471 % | |
136 | Cabo Verde | 53.405 % | |
137 | Belgium | 53.382 % | |
138 | Serbia | 53.373 % | |
139 | Sierra Leone | 53.299 % | |
140 | Suriname | 52.653 % | |
141 | Cuba | 52.552 % | |
142 | United States Virgin Islands | 52.454 % | |
143 | Tonga | 52.389 % | |
144 | Guinea | 52.376 % | |
145 | North Macedonia | 52.107 % | |
146 | Romania | 51.998 % | |
147 | Pakistan | 51.587 % | |
148 | India | 51.547 % | |
149 | Papua New Guinea | 51.004 % | |
150 | Croatia | 50.97 % | |
151 | Guyana | 50.741 % | |
152 | Senegal | 50.716 % | |
153 | South Africa | 50.548 % | |
154 | Sri Lanka | 50.495 % | |
155 | Montenegro | 50.373 % | |
156 | Greece | 50.055 % | |
157 | Eswatini | 49.493 % | |
158 | Turkey | 49.334 % | |
159 | Italy | 48.218 % | |
160 | Venezuela | 48.178 % | |
161 | Gabon | 47.881 % | |
162 | Gambia | 47.675 % | |
163 | Samoa | 47.572 % | |
164 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 47.468 % | |
165 | Lebanon | 47.448 % | |
166 | Tunisia | 45.506 % | |
167 | Libya | 45.021 % | |
168 | Morocco | 44.539 % | |
169 | Egypt | 41.616 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 41.579 % | |
171 | Turkmenistan | 41.547 % | |
172 | Iran | 41.359 % | |
173 | State of Palestine | 40.936 % | |
174 | Mauritania | 40.548 % | |
175 | Iraq | 40.307 % | |
176 | Jordan | 39.947 % | |
177 | Nepal | 39.387 % | |
178 | Puerto Rico | 39.249 % | |
179 | Sudan | 39.121 % | |
180 | Algeria | 38.042 % | |
181 | Tajikistan | 36.787 % | |
182 | Syrian Arab Republic | 35.911 % | |
183 | Somalia | 33.707 % | |
184 | Yemen | 32.487 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 31.564 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 23.123 % |
- #1
Qatar
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Solomon Islands
- #4
Tanzania
- #5
Cambodia
- #6
North Korea
- #7
Nigeria
- #8
United Arab Emirates
- #9
Burundi
- #10
Mozambique
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Yemen
- #183
Somalia
- #182
Syrian Arab Republic
- #181
Tajikistan
- #180
Algeria
- #179
Sudan
- #178
Puerto Rico
- #177
Nepal
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2020, Qatar led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 87.11%, while the global range extended from a minimum of 23.12% to a maximum of 87.11%. The global average Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 59.35%, providing a benchmark for understanding youth engagement in labor markets worldwide.
Economic Factors Influencing Youth Labor Force Participation
The Youth Labor Force Participation Rate (YLFP) is significantly impacted by a country's economic conditions. For instance, in Madagascar and the Solomon Islands, where YLFP rates are 84.59% and 83.52% respectively, high participation can be attributed to limited educational opportunities and a greater need for young people to contribute economically at an early age. Conversely, countries like Sao Tome and Principe and Djibouti, with rates of 23.12% and 31.56%, may have lower participation due to higher availability of educational opportunities or economic instability, which discourages youth from entering the workforce.
Impact of Socio-Political Stability on Participation Rates
Socio-political stability plays a crucial role in determining YLFP. For example, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, with rates of 87.11% and 78.78%, benefit from stable governance and economic diversification, encouraging youth participation through various sectors. In contrast, countries like Yemen and the Syrian Arab Republic, with rates of 32.49% and 35.91%, suffer from conflict and instability, which disrupts labor markets and reduces opportunities for young people.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
The average global YLFP saw a decrease of 1.44 percentage points, or 2.4%, in 2020. Some countries experienced significant changes, such as Malawi and Rwanda, which saw increases of 4.99 and 4.21 percentage points, respectively. These increases can be attributed to policy shifts focusing on youth employment and vocational training. On the other hand, Saint Lucia and Belize experienced the steepest declines, with reductions of 15.06 and 15.05 percentage points. These decreases are often linked to economic downturns and tourism sector contractions due to global events, which significantly impacted youth employment opportunities.
Demographic and Educational Influences
Demographics and education levels are critical in shaping YLFP. In countries like Nigeria and Burundi, with participation rates of 79.31% and 78.55%, large youth populations and limited access to higher education drive more young individuals to join the workforce early. Conversely, in countries such as Puerto Rico and Nepal, where the rates are 39.25% and 39.39%, higher education enrollment rates can delay entry into the labor market as young people pursue further education before seeking employment.
In summary, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2020 reflects a complex interplay of economic, socio-political, and demographic factors. By examining these elements, policymakers and stakeholders can better understand the challenges and opportunities associated with youth employment and develop strategies to enhance labor market engagement for young people globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2020
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2020?
Qatar had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2020, with 87.11%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2020?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2020, with 23.12%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2020?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2020 was 59.35%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2020?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2020 was 60.26%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2020?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2020 were Qatar (87.11%), Madagascar (84.59%), and Solomon Islands (83.52%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2020?
The dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2020 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
Canada
In 2020, Canada had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 64.097%, ranking #60 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges faced by young workers in the labor market. Key drivers include Canada's strong emphasis on education and training, which may delay entry into the workforce, as well as economic fluctuations that impact job availability for youth.
Nigeria
Nigeria's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2020 was 79.314 %, ranking the country #7 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a robust engagement of young individuals in the labor market. Key drivers include Nigeria's large youth population, which constitutes a significant portion of its demographic structure, and economic factors that encourage youth employment in various sectors, particularly agriculture and informal markets.
Angola
In 2020, Angola achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 73.319 %, ranking #19 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a dynamic youth population eager to enter the workforce. Contributing factors include Angola's young demographic profile, with a significant portion of the population under 25, and ongoing economic recovery efforts following years of civil conflict that have spurred employment initiatives.
Denmark
In 2020, Denmark ranked #77 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.144%. This rate is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in youth employment compared to some neighboring countries. Key factors influencing this statistic include Denmark's strong emphasis on education and vocational training, which may delay entry into the labor market for many young people as they pursue higher qualifications.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2020 was 55.878 %, ranking it #125 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the European Union average, which reflects challenges in integrating young people into the workforce. Contributing factors include a declining population and economic transitions that have affected job availability, particularly in rural areas where youth employment opportunities are limited.
Belize
In 2020, Belize had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 54.68 %, ranking #130 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include Belize's limited economic diversification and a relatively high youth population that faces barriers such as lack of access to vocational training and job placement services.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks #63 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 63.44% in 2020. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the workforce. Contributing factors include a large youth population and economic activities in agriculture and mining, which often require labor-intensive work. However, challenges such as political instability and limited access to education may impact the quality of employment opportunities for young workers.
Austria
In 2020, Austria ranked #93 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.363%. This figure is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include a strong emphasis on vocational training, which may delay entry into the labor market for many young Austrians, as well as economic fluctuations impacting job availability during that period.
Burundi
In 2020, Burundi achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 78.546 %, ranking #9 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting the country's unique demographic dynamics. A large proportion of Burundi's population is young, and economic challenges compel many youths to enter the labor market early, often in informal sectors.
Cambodia
Cambodia ranked #5 globally in 2020 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 82.238%. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful population and economic reliance on labor-intensive industries. Key drivers include a large demographic of young people entering the workforce, as well as government policies aimed at promoting employment in sectors such as agriculture and textiles.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data