Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1998
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 86.465 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.204 % | |
3 | Mozambique | 84.305 % | |
4 | Burundi | 84.217 % | |
5 | Nigeria | 83.67 % | |
6 | Solomon Islands | 83.009 % | |
7 | Qatar | 82.606 % | |
8 | Burkina Faso | 82.501 % | |
9 | North Korea | 82.298 % | |
10 | Cameroon | 82.028 % | |
11 | Ethiopia | 82.009 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.857 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 80.648 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 80.543 % | |
15 | Niger | 78.924 % | |
16 | Azerbaijan | 78.887 % | |
17 | Angola | 77.394 % | |
18 | Liberia | 77.132 % | |
19 | Vanuatu | 76.859 % | |
20 | Vietnam | 75.327 % | |
21 | China | 75.246 % | |
22 | Georgia | 75.02 % | |
23 | Iceland | 75.006 % | |
24 | United Arab Emirates | 74.875 % | |
25 | Thailand | 74.492 % | |
26 | South Sudan | 74.442 % | |
27 | Bahamas | 74.245 % | |
28 | Uganda | 74.243 % | |
29 | Lesotho | 73.072 % | |
30 | Central African Republic | 72.674 % | |
31 | Ghana | 72.613 % | |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.52 % | |
33 | Kenya | 72.467 % | |
34 | Benin | 71.914 % | |
35 | Kazakhstan | 71.645 % | |
36 | Timor-Leste | 71.18 % | |
37 | Bolivia | 70.491 % | |
38 | Mali | 70.34 % | |
39 | Bhutan | 70.142 % | |
40 | Chad | 70.023 % | |
41 | Paraguay | 69.945 % | |
42 | Barbados | 69.151 % | |
43 | Guam | 68.815 % | |
44 | Congo | 68.458 % | |
45 | Colombia | 68.159 % | |
46 | Brunei Darussalam | 68.118 % | |
47 | Kyrgyzstan | 68.046 % | |
48 | Jamaica | 67.968 % | |
49 | Switzerland | 67.862 % | |
50 | Myanmar | 67.685 % | |
51 | Netherlands | 67.292 % | |
52 | Indonesia | 66.93 % | |
53 | Peru | 66.85 % | |
54 | Guatemala | 66.797 % | |
55 | Ecuador | 66.38 % | |
56 | Kuwait | 66.338 % | |
57 | Honduras | 66.011 % | |
58 | United States | 66.01 % | |
59 | Norway | 65.954 % | |
60 | Zimbabwe | 65.939 % | |
61 | New Caledonia | 65.416 % | |
62 | China, Macao SAR | 65.415 % | |
63 | Denmark | 65.315 % | |
64 | Singapore | 65.176 % | |
65 | Côte d'Ivoire | 65.17 % | |
66 | Bahrain | 65.164 % | |
67 | Brazil | 64.922 % | |
68 | Canada | 64.67 % | |
69 | New Zealand | 64.576 % | |
70 | Sierra Leone | 64.556 % | |
71 | Venezuela | 64.45 % | |
72 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 64.397 % | |
73 | Guinea | 64.127 % | |
74 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.896 % | |
75 | Saint Lucia | 63.813 % | |
76 | Albania | 63.712 % | |
77 | Haiti | 63.702 % | |
78 | Japan | 63.329 % | |
79 | Ireland | 63.325 % | |
80 | Australia | 63.133 % | |
81 | Argentina | 63.084 % | |
82 | Trinidad and Tobago | 63.068 % | |
83 | Rwanda | 62.902 % | |
84 | Panama | 62.849 % | |
85 | El Salvador | 62.631 % | |
86 | Armenia | 62.514 % | |
87 | Sweden | 62.076 % | |
88 | Laos | 61.951 % | |
89 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.91 % | |
90 | Philippines | 61.311 % | |
91 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 61.146 % | |
92 | Czech Republic | 61.061 % | |
93 | Uruguay | 61.008 % | |
94 | Lithuania | 60.992 % | |
95 | United Kingdom | 60.765 % | |
96 | Cyprus | 60.621 % | |
97 | Portugal | 60.568 % | |
98 | Mexico | 60.475 % | |
99 | Israel | 60.445 % | |
100 | United States Virgin Islands | 60.425 % | |
101 | Estonia | 60.226 % | |
102 | South Korea | 60.213 % | |
103 | Finland | 60.166 % | |
104 | Botswana | 60.12 % | |
105 | Republic of Moldova | 59.864 % | |
106 | Costa Rica | 59.69 % | |
107 | Zambia | 59.598 % | |
108 | Nicaragua | 59.48 % | |
109 | Slovenia | 59.452 % | |
110 | India | 59.404 % | |
111 | Mauritius | 59.248 % | |
112 | Mongolia | 59.193 % | |
113 | French Polynesia | 59.16 % | |
114 | Fiji | 59.139 % | |
115 | Slovakia | 59.083 % | |
116 | Latvia | 59.02 % | |
117 | Tonga | 58.943 % | |
118 | Malaysia | 58.903 % | |
119 | Sri Lanka | 58.82 % | |
120 | Cabo Verde | 58.786 % | |
121 | Belize | 58.7 % | |
122 | Togo | 58.619 % | |
123 | Belarus | 58.602 % | |
124 | Austria | 58.404 % | |
125 | Dominican Republic | 58.244 % | |
126 | Germany | 58.173 % | |
127 | Russia | 58.115 % | |
128 | Guyana | 58.065 % | |
129 | Bangladesh | 57.966 % | |
130 | South Africa | 57.742 % | |
131 | Ukraine | 57.671 % | |
132 | Uzbekistan | 57.31 % | |
133 | Oman | 56.854 % | |
134 | Chile | 56.752 % | |
135 | Poland | 56.743 % | |
136 | Samoa | 56.398 % | |
137 | Turkmenistan | 55.978 % | |
138 | Serbia | 55.488 % | |
139 | France | 55.041 % | |
140 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
141 | Eswatini | 53.733 % | |
142 | Namibia | 53.71 % | |
143 | Croatia | 53.461 % | |
144 | Maldives | 53.408 % | |
145 | Cuba | 53.325 % | |
146 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 53.172 % | |
147 | North Macedonia | 53.171 % | |
148 | Turkey | 52.796 % | |
149 | Greece | 51.752 % | |
150 | Luxembourg | 51.42 % | |
151 | Sudan | 51.362 % | |
152 | Morocco | 51.295 % | |
153 | Spain | 51.242 % | |
154 | Romania | 50.843 % | |
155 | Hungary | 50.819 % | |
156 | Belgium | 50.744 % | |
157 | Senegal | 50.466 % | |
158 | Malta | 50.29 % | |
159 | Pakistan | 49.95 % | |
160 | Bulgaria | 49.789 % | |
161 | Syrian Arab Republic | 49.72 % | |
162 | Montenegro | 49.352 % | |
163 | Tunisia | 48.781 % | |
164 | Saudi Arabia | 48.689 % | |
165 | Gambia | 48.367 % | |
166 | Papua New Guinea | 48.337 % | |
167 | Gabon | 48.09 % | |
168 | Italy | 47.566 % | |
169 | Puerto Rico | 47.55 % | |
170 | Suriname | 46.952 % | |
171 | Afghanistan | 46.667 % | |
172 | Libya | 46.285 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 46.096 % | |
174 | Egypt | 46 % | |
175 | Yemen | 45.595 % | |
176 | Algeria | 44.719 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.095 % | |
178 | Iran | 43.95 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.205 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.915 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.405 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.175 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.448 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 34.297 % | |
185 | Somalia | 34.028 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.417 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Mozambique
- #4
Burundi
- #5
Nigeria
- #6
Solomon Islands
- #7
Qatar
- #8
Burkina Faso
- #9
North Korea
- #10
Cameroon
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Iran
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1998, the country with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was Tanzania, with a rate of 86.47%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 24.42% to a maximum of 86.47%. The global average for this metric was 61.65%, providing a benchmark against which individual countries' performances can be assessed.
Economic Factors Influencing Participation Rates
The economic landscape of a country significantly influences its Youth Labor Force Participation Rate. Countries with higher rates, such as Tanzania (86.47%) and Madagascar (86.20%), often rely heavily on agriculture and informal sectors. In these economies, young people are typically more engaged in work due to economic necessity, as familial contributions to household income are critical.
Conversely, nations like Sao Tome and Principe with the lowest rate of 24.42% often have different economic structures. In such countries, economic opportunities for youth may be limited, or there may be a stronger emphasis on education, delaying entry into the workforce.
Geopolitical and Social Influences
Geopolitical stability and social norms also play a role in shaping labor force participation. For instance, countries like Somalia (34.03%) and Djibouti (34.30%) have lower participation rates, potentially influenced by regional instability or conflict, which disrupts economic activities and employment opportunities.
In contrast, countries like Burundi (84.22%) and Mozambique (84.31%) demonstrate high participation rates despite economic challenges, possibly due to social norms that encourage early workforce entry.
Impact of Education Policies
Education policies significantly impact youth participation in the labor force. Nations such as Jordan (39.45%) and State of Palestine (40.18%) exhibit lower rates, which may be attributed to governmental emphasis on education, thereby reducing the immediate need for youth to join the labor market.
On the other hand, countries like Burkina Faso (82.50%) and Cameroon (82.03%) might not have as robust educational infrastructures, leading to higher youth labor force participation as education is less accessible, and work becomes a necessity.
Year-over-Year Trends and Movements
The year-over-year changes in youth labor force participation provide insights into dynamic shifts. Notably, Sri Lanka experienced the highest increase of 3.58% (a 6.5% rise), suggesting possible economic reforms or improvements in employment opportunities that encouraged higher youth engagement. Similarly, Ecuador and El Salvador saw increases of 2.13% and 2.12% respectively, indicating positive shifts in their labor markets.
Conversely, countries like South Korea saw a decline of 1.81% (-2.9%), which may reflect a strategic shift towards higher education and skill development, delaying youth entry into the workforce. Similarly, Estonia and Albania experienced decreases, possibly due to similar educational and economic development strategies.
In conclusion, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1998 reveals significant variations driven by economic necessity, geopolitical stability, social norms, and educational policies. Understanding these factors provides a comprehensive view of how youth engage in global labor markets, offering insights into broader socio-economic trends.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1998
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1998?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1998, with 86.47%.
What was the lowest youth labor force participation rate by country in 1998?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1998, at 24.42%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1998?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1998 was 61.65%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 1998?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 1998 was 61%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation in 1998?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation in 1998 were Tanzania (86.47%), Madagascar (86.2%), and Mozambique (84.31%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for youth labor force participation in 1998?
The dataset for youth labor force participation in 1998 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
Guinea
In 1998, Guinea ranked #73 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 64.127 %. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a youthful population and economic reliance on agriculture, which often necessitates the involvement of young individuals in various labor activities. Additionally, limited access to education may compel youth to seek employment earlier to support their families.
State of Palestine
The State of Palestine had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 40.175 % in 1998, ranking #182 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly lower than the global average, reflecting broader regional challenges. Contributing factors include ongoing economic instability, limited job opportunities due to political circumstances, and a high youth population that struggles to enter the workforce.
Malawi
In 1998, Malawi achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 80.857 %, ranking #12 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting the country's strong youth engagement in the labor market. Contributing factors include a youthful population, with over 45% under the age of 15, and economic structures that necessitate early participation in agriculture and informal sectors.
Burkina Faso
In 1998, Burkina Faso achieved a remarkable rank of #8 globally for its Youth Labor Force Participation Rate, which stood at 82.501%. This figure was significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a youthful population demographic and economic reliance on agriculture, where many young individuals participate in subsistence farming and informal employment.
Kuwait
In 1998, Kuwait's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 66.338%, ranking it #56 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a strong engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include Kuwait's wealth from oil exports, which has created job opportunities, and a relatively young population eager to enter the workforce.
Tonga
In 1998, Tonga had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 58.943%, ranking #117 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than many Pacific neighbors, reflecting the region's unique economic conditions. The participation rate is driven by a combination of cultural factors that encourage youth employment and the limited availability of formal job opportunities, necessitating greater involvement in the labor market from a young age.
Ecuador
In 1998, Ecuador had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.38%, ranking #55 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's pressing need for economic contributions from its young population. Key drivers of this statistic include a high youth population and limited formal employment opportunities, which compel many young Ecuadorians to enter the labor market early.
Zimbabwe
In 1998, Zimbabwe had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.939%, ranking #60 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of young people in the labor market. Key drivers include Zimbabwe's youthful population and the economic necessity for families to rely on multiple income sources amid challenging economic conditions. Additionally, the country’s educational system encouraged early entry into the workforce, impacting this participation rate.
Slovakia
In 1998, Slovakia recorded a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.083 %, ranking #115 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than many of its Central European neighbors, reflecting the region's stronger economic conditions. Factors contributing to this participation rate include Slovakia's transition from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented one, which impacted job availability for youth during this period.
Italy
In 1998, Italy had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 47.566%, ranking #168 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly lower than the global average, reflecting economic challenges faced by the country during this period. High youth unemployment rates, coupled with a rigid labor market and educational mismatches, contributed to this low participation level, limiting opportunities for young Italians entering the workforce.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data