Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1993
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Burundi | 88.252 % | |
2 | Tanzania | 86.574 % | |
3 | Madagascar | 86.104 % | |
4 | Mozambique | 84.04 % | |
5 | Qatar | 83.684 % | |
6 | Burkina Faso | 83.532 % | |
7 | Nigeria | 83.416 % | |
8 | Solomon Islands | 82.939 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 82.218 % | |
10 | North Korea | 81.877 % | |
11 | Ethiopia | 81.831 % | |
12 | Eritrea | 80.82 % | |
13 | Malawi | 80.79 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 79.944 % | |
15 | Niger | 78.865 % | |
16 | Georgia | 78.727 % | |
17 | China | 77.754 % | |
18 | Vietnam | 77.709 % | |
19 | Angola | 77.374 % | |
20 | Liberia | 77.28 % | |
21 | Vanuatu | 77.012 % | |
22 | Azerbaijan | 75.515 % | |
23 | United Arab Emirates | 75.482 % | |
24 | Thailand | 75.006 % | |
25 | South Sudan | 74.418 % | |
26 | Lesotho | 73.587 % | |
27 | Uganda | 73.469 % | |
28 | Bahamas | 73.197 % | |
29 | Ghana | 72.929 % | |
30 | Iceland | 72.915 % | |
31 | Kenya | 72.813 % | |
32 | Central African Republic | 72.606 % | |
33 | Chad | 72.3 % | |
34 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.219 % | |
35 | Benin | 72.119 % | |
36 | Timor-Leste | 71.405 % | |
37 | Guam | 71.272 % | |
38 | Kazakhstan | 71.011 % | |
39 | United States Virgin Islands | 70.587 % | |
40 | Mali | 70.411 % | |
41 | Bhutan | 70.338 % | |
42 | Jamaica | 70.204 % | |
43 | Bolivia | 69.52 % | |
44 | Paraguay | 69.339 % | |
45 | Congo | 68.534 % | |
46 | Barbados | 68.225 % | |
47 | Myanmar | 68.076 % | |
48 | Albania | 67.876 % | |
49 | Colombia | 67.33 % | |
50 | Brunei Darussalam | 67.09 % | |
51 | Zimbabwe | 66.968 % | |
52 | Netherlands | 66.802 % | |
53 | Guatemala | 66.484 % | |
54 | Denmark | 66.438 % | |
55 | Bahrain | 66.04 % | |
56 | Honduras | 65.927 % | |
57 | Haiti | 65.753 % | |
58 | Indonesia | 65.625 % | |
59 | Kyrgyzstan | 65.541 % | |
60 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.44 % | |
61 | Brazil | 65.227 % | |
62 | United States | 65.135 % | |
63 | Armenia | 65.05 % | |
64 | Switzerland | 65.043 % | |
65 | New Caledonia | 65 % | |
66 | Canada | 64.935 % | |
67 | Lithuania | 64.643 % | |
68 | Venezuela | 64.628 % | |
69 | Sierra Leone | 64.424 % | |
70 | Guinea-Bissau | 64.023 % | |
71 | Kuwait | 63.852 % | |
72 | Russia | 63.84 % | |
73 | Guinea | 63.835 % | |
74 | Japan | 63.809 % | |
75 | Sweden | 63.437 % | |
76 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 63.274 % | |
77 | Saint Lucia | 63.247 % | |
78 | Ecuador | 63.226 % | |
79 | Estonia | 63.164 % | |
80 | New Zealand | 62.867 % | |
81 | Norway | 62.8 % | |
82 | Rwanda | 62.676 % | |
83 | Australia | 62.597 % | |
84 | El Salvador | 62.565 % | |
85 | Singapore | 62.453 % | |
86 | Laos | 62.336 % | |
87 | Slovakia | 62.159 % | |
88 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 61.995 % | |
89 | Botswana | 61.937 % | |
90 | Argentina | 61.495 % | |
91 | Philippines | 61.465 % | |
92 | Czech Republic | 61.42 % | |
93 | Latvia | 61.289 % | |
94 | Finland | 61.278 % | |
95 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.071 % | |
96 | United Kingdom | 61.027 % | |
97 | Israel | 60.885 % | |
98 | Ireland | 60.783 % | |
99 | Cyprus | 60.533 % | |
100 | Poland | 60.424 % | |
101 | South Korea | 60.411 % | |
102 | China, Macao SAR | 60.171 % | |
103 | Panama | 60.143 % | |
104 | Cabo Verde | 60.105 % | |
105 | Guyana | 60.06 % | |
106 | Mauritius | 59.968 % | |
107 | Peru | 59.844 % | |
108 | Fiji | 59.694 % | |
109 | Trinidad and Tobago | 59.612 % | |
110 | Zambia | 59.601 % | |
111 | French Polynesia | 59.467 % | |
112 | Mexico | 59.289 % | |
113 | Republic of Moldova | 59.28 % | |
114 | Belarus | 59.129 % | |
115 | Togo | 58.995 % | |
116 | Tonga | 58.879 % | |
117 | Ukraine | 58.823 % | |
118 | Oman | 58.777 % | |
119 | Serbia | 58.774 % | |
120 | Mongolia | 58.697 % | |
121 | Portugal | 58.554 % | |
122 | Germany | 58.549 % | |
123 | Slovenia | 58.055 % | |
124 | India | 58.027 % | |
125 | South Africa | 57.955 % | |
126 | Nicaragua | 57.739 % | |
127 | Uzbekistan | 57.572 % | |
128 | Dominican Republic | 57.48 % | |
129 | Bangladesh | 57.219 % | |
130 | Austria | 57.19 % | |
131 | Malaysia | 57.043 % | |
132 | Sri Lanka | 56.72 % | |
133 | Uruguay | 56.59 % | |
134 | Costa Rica | 56.54 % | |
135 | Samoa | 56.258 % | |
136 | Croatia | 56.219 % | |
137 | Belize | 56.143 % | |
138 | North Macedonia | 55.347 % | |
139 | France | 55.187 % | |
140 | Namibia | 55.087 % | |
141 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
142 | Chile | 54.81 % | |
143 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 54.676 % | |
144 | Eswatini | 54.037 % | |
145 | Luxembourg | 52.302 % | |
146 | Cuba | 52.204 % | |
147 | Turkey | 52.153 % | |
148 | Morocco | 51.316 % | |
149 | Hungary | 51.058 % | |
150 | Saudi Arabia | 50.971 % | |
151 | Montenegro | 50.89 % | |
152 | Senegal | 50.884 % | |
153 | Turkmenistan | 50.861 % | |
154 | Syrian Arab Republic | 50.8 % | |
155 | Sudan | 50.763 % | |
156 | Romania | 50.761 % | |
157 | Maldives | 50.594 % | |
158 | Malta | 49.927 % | |
159 | Bulgaria | 49.909 % | |
160 | Spain | 49.873 % | |
161 | Belgium | 49.624 % | |
162 | Greece | 49.555 % | |
163 | Pakistan | 49.2 % | |
164 | Tunisia | 49.1 % | |
165 | Gabon | 48.518 % | |
166 | Gambia | 48.261 % | |
167 | Papua New Guinea | 47.995 % | |
168 | Italy | 47.988 % | |
169 | Suriname | 47.945 % | |
170 | Egypt | 47.89 % | |
171 | Puerto Rico | 47.12 % | |
172 | Afghanistan | 47.024 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 46.336 % | |
174 | Iran | 45.796 % | |
175 | Algeria | 45.788 % | |
176 | Libya | 45.623 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.451 % | |
178 | Yemen | 44.14 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.364 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.84 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.557 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.311 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.442 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 34.937 % | |
185 | Somalia | 33.827 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.698 % |
- #1
Burundi
- #2
Tanzania
- #3
Madagascar
- #4
Mozambique
- #5
Qatar
- #6
Burkina Faso
- #7
Nigeria
- #8
Solomon Islands
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
North Korea
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Yemen
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1993, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was highest in Burundi at 88.25%, while globally, participation ranged from 24.70% to 88.25%. The average participation rate across 186 countries was 61.68%, providing a broad overview of youth engagement in the labor market during this period.
Economic Development and Its Impact on Youth Labor Force Participation
Economic factors significantly influence the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate, with countries like Burundi and Tanzania reporting high participation rates of 88.25% and 86.57%, respectively. These countries often have limited access to higher education, compelling youth to enter the workforce early. In contrast, nations like Sao Tome and Principe and Somalia, with rates of 24.70% and 33.83%, may reflect higher barriers to entry into the labor market, possibly due to economic instability or lack of opportunities.
Moreover, economic policies and labor market conditions can either facilitate or hinder youth employment. For instance, Qatar with its 83.68% participation rate, benefits from a robust economy that integrates young workers effectively, whereas Jordan at 39.44% might face challenges such as high youth unemployment and economic transitions impacting these rates.
Social and Cultural Influences on Youth Employment
Social norms and cultural expectations also play a critical role in shaping the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate. In many African nations such as Mozambique (84.04%) and Burkina Faso (83.53%), cultural factors might encourage early entry into the workforce, often driven by necessity rather than choice. Conversely, in the State of Palestine (40.31%) and Lebanon (44.45%), societal norms may prioritize education over immediate employment, hence lower participation rates.
Cultural attitudes towards gender roles can further influence these statistics. For instance, in Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries, traditional views on gender roles may restrict female participation in the workforce, thereby affecting overall youth labor force statistics.
Understanding Year-over-Year Changes
The year-over-year changes in youth labor force participation reveal interesting trends. Notably, Azerbaijan experienced the largest increase of 4.4%, followed by Kyrgyzstan at 4.2%. These increases could be attributed to economic reforms or improved educational systems leading to better job opportunities for the youth.
On the other hand, countries such as Turkey saw a significant decrease of 6.9%. Such declines might be linked to economic downturns or political instability, which can lead to reduced job availability and discourage youth from participating in the labor market. Similarly, Russia and Slovakia with decreases of 3.1% each, may reflect transitional economic phases impacting youth employment opportunities.
Policy Implications and Future Outlook
The data underscores critical policy implications for governments aiming to enhance youth labor force participation. Countries with low participation rates, such as Djibouti (34.94%) and Nepal (41.56%), may benefit from policies that improve educational access and vocational training, thereby equipping youth with the skills needed for the job market.
Conversely, nations with high participation rates need to ensure that young workers are not merely entering the workforce out of necessity but are also gaining meaningful employment. This involves creating stable job markets and fostering environments where youth can thrive professionally.
In conclusion, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1993 highlights diverse economic, cultural, and policy-driven factors influencing youth engagement in the labor market. Understanding these dynamics is essential for crafting policies that support sustainable economic growth and development through active youth participation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1993
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1993?
Burundi had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1993, with 88.25%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1993?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1993, at 24.7%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1993?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1993 was 61.68%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 1993?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 1993 was 61.28%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 1993?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 1993 were Burundi, Tanzania, and Madagascar.
What is the range of youth labor force participation rates in 1993?
The range of youth labor force participation rates in 1993 spanned from 24.7% in Sao Tome and Principe to 88.25% in Burundi.
Insights by country
South Korea
In 1993, South Korea had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.411%, ranking #101 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than many of its regional peers, reflecting a complex interplay of economic restructuring and educational priorities during that period. South Korea was experiencing rapid industrialization, which shifted focus towards higher education, often delaying youth entry into the labor market.
Malaysia
In 1993, Malaysia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 57.043%, ranking #131 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than many Southeast Asian neighbors, reflecting a regional trend of varying youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include the country's rapid industrialization during this period, which created a demand for skilled labor, as well as educational policies that encouraged higher enrollment rates in secondary and tertiary education, impacting immediate labor market entry.
Germany
In 1993, Germany had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 58.549%, ranking #122 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than many of its European neighbors, reflecting broader economic challenges during the post-reunification period. The rate was influenced by high youth unemployment and a shift in educational policies that encouraged longer periods of schooling and vocational training, which delayed entry into the labor market.
State of Palestine
In 1993, the State of Palestine had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 40.311 %, ranking #182 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly lower than the global average, indicating substantial challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include ongoing political instability, limited economic development, and restricted access to job markets due to regional conflicts.
Canada
In 1993, Canada ranked #66 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 64.935 %. This figure was notably higher than the bottom-ranked countries, indicating a relatively engaged youth workforce. Contributing factors include Canada's strong educational system and economic policies that encouraged youth employment, particularly in sectors like services and technology.
Israel
In 1993, Israel had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.885 %, ranking #97 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, indicating challenges in integrating youth into the workforce compared to many other nations. Key drivers for this participation rate included the country's unique demographic composition, with a significant portion of the population engaged in military service, which often delays entry into the civilian labor market.
Ecuador
In 1993, Ecuador's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 63.226 %, ranking #78 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting a trend where many young Ecuadorians entered the workforce early due to economic necessity. Key drivers of this participation included a significant informal economy and a lack of access to higher education, which pushed youth into labor markets at a young age.
Iceland
In 1993, Iceland achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 72.915%, ranking #30 out of 186 countries. This figure was notably higher than the global average, reflecting Iceland's strong emphasis on education and youth empowerment. The country's robust economy, driven by fishing, renewable energy, and tourism, creates ample job opportunities for young people, while progressive labor policies support their integration into the workforce.
Nigeria
Nigeria ranked #7 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 83.416 % in 1993. This rate was significantly higher than many countries, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market compared to global averages. Key drivers of this high participation included Nigeria's youthful population, with a median age of approximately 18 years, and the necessity for many young people to contribute economically in a country facing challenges such as economic instability and limited job opportunities for adults.
China, Macao SAR
In 1993, China, Macao SAR had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.171 %, ranking #102 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, reflecting challenges in integrating youth into the workforce during a period of economic transition. Key drivers included the region's evolving economy and educational policies that were still adapting to the demands of a changing labor market.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data