Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2006
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 88.349 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.533 % | |
3 | Mozambique | 84.493 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.474 % | |
5 | Qatar | 83.747 % | |
6 | North Korea | 82.069 % | |
7 | Nigeria | 81.963 % | |
8 | Ethiopia | 81.923 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 81.746 % | |
10 | Cambodia | 81.027 % | |
11 | Burkina Faso | 80.747 % | |
12 | Eritrea | 80.039 % | |
13 | Malawi | 79.691 % | |
14 | Niger | 79.341 % | |
15 | Burundi | 77.447 % | |
16 | Angola | 77.26 % | |
17 | United Arab Emirates | 77.223 % | |
18 | Liberia | 77.102 % | |
19 | Iceland | 76.89 % | |
20 | Vanuatu | 76.869 % | |
21 | Peru | 76.14 % | |
22 | Vietnam | 74.596 % | |
23 | South Sudan | 74.225 % | |
24 | Bahamas | 74.147 % | |
25 | Uganda | 73.919 % | |
26 | Kenya | 73.232 % | |
27 | Central African Republic | 72.549 % | |
28 | Thailand | 72.482 % | |
29 | China | 72.281 % | |
30 | Ghana | 72.102 % | |
31 | Benin | 71.808 % | |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 71.694 % | |
33 | Mali | 70.267 % | |
34 | Barbados | 69.79 % | |
35 | Timor-Leste | 69.685 % | |
36 | Kazakhstan | 69.68 % | |
37 | Bhutan | 69.532 % | |
38 | Lesotho | 69.213 % | |
39 | Bolivia | 69.121 % | |
40 | Georgia | 69.119 % | |
41 | Norway | 68.171 % | |
42 | Kuwait | 68.084 % | |
43 | Ecuador | 67.949 % | |
44 | Congo | 67.846 % | |
45 | New Zealand | 67.742 % | |
46 | Brazil | 67.705 % | |
47 | Brunei Darussalam | 67.571 % | |
48 | Switzerland | 67.32 % | |
49 | Netherlands | 67.165 % | |
50 | Paraguay | 67.047 % | |
51 | Canada | 66.827 % | |
52 | Bahrain | 66.721 % | |
53 | Trinidad and Tobago | 66.542 % | |
54 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 66.378 % | |
55 | Denmark | 66.341 % | |
56 | Chad | 66.168 % | |
57 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.126 % | |
58 | Myanmar | 66.123 % | |
59 | Ireland | 66.086 % | |
60 | Singapore | 66.08 % | |
61 | China, Macao SAR | 65.85 % | |
62 | Zimbabwe | 65.658 % | |
63 | Saint Lucia | 65.625 % | |
64 | United States | 65.175 % | |
65 | Jamaica | 64.94 % | |
66 | Venezuela | 64.86 % | |
67 | Australia | 64.85 % | |
68 | Azerbaijan | 64.801 % | |
69 | New Caledonia | 64.631 % | |
70 | Colombia | 64.616 % | |
71 | Kyrgyzstan | 64.498 % | |
72 | Sierra Leone | 64.348 % | |
73 | Indonesia | 64.208 % | |
74 | Haiti | 64.191 % | |
75 | Panama | 63.712 % | |
76 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.569 % | |
77 | Sweden | 63.335 % | |
78 | Cyprus | 63.3 % | |
79 | United States Virgin Islands | 62.798 % | |
80 | Guam | 62.7 % | |
81 | Finland | 62.276 % | |
82 | Nicaragua | 62.265 % | |
83 | Guatemala | 62.235 % | |
84 | Israel | 62.222 % | |
85 | United Kingdom | 62.098 % | |
86 | Portugal | 62.047 % | |
87 | Uruguay | 61.981 % | |
88 | Guinea | 61.798 % | |
89 | Argentina | 61.795 % | |
90 | South Korea | 61.463 % | |
91 | Philippines | 61.418 % | |
92 | Russia | 61.227 % | |
93 | Laos | 61.189 % | |
94 | Rwanda | 61.143 % | |
95 | Belarus | 61.038 % | |
96 | Belize | 60.978 % | |
97 | El Salvador | 60.921 % | |
98 | Mexico | 60.875 % | |
99 | Armenia | 60.674 % | |
100 | Costa Rica | 60.647 % | |
101 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.544 % | |
102 | Estonia | 60.497 % | |
103 | Malaysia | 60.455 % | |
104 | Japan | 60.423 % | |
105 | Botswana | 59.894 % | |
106 | Honduras | 59.856 % | |
107 | Slovenia | 59.466 % | |
108 | Czech Republic | 59.273 % | |
109 | Zambia | 59.256 % | |
110 | Mongolia | 59.188 % | |
111 | Slovakia | 59.062 % | |
112 | Mauritius | 59.024 % | |
113 | Germany | 58.997 % | |
114 | Latvia | 58.948 % | |
115 | Equatorial Guinea | 58.889 % | |
116 | Austria | 58.563 % | |
117 | India | 58.345 % | |
118 | Togo | 58.226 % | |
119 | Republic of Moldova | 58.093 % | |
120 | Bangladesh | 58.071 % | |
121 | Spain | 57.835 % | |
122 | Fiji | 57.804 % | |
123 | Tonga | 57.365 % | |
124 | Dominican Republic | 57.304 % | |
125 | Chile | 56.875 % | |
126 | Cabo Verde | 56.649 % | |
127 | Oman | 56.646 % | |
128 | Guyana | 56.537 % | |
129 | French Polynesia | 56.407 % | |
130 | South Africa | 55.994 % | |
131 | France | 55.916 % | |
132 | Namibia | 55.839 % | |
133 | Ukraine | 55.81 % | |
134 | Albania | 55.354 % | |
135 | Samoa | 55.345 % | |
136 | Uzbekistan | 55.209 % | |
137 | Luxembourg | 55.149 % | |
138 | Lithuania | 55.137 % | |
139 | Sri Lanka | 54.207 % | |
140 | Poland | 54.194 % | |
141 | Cuba | 54.062 % | |
142 | Serbia | 53.413 % | |
143 | North Macedonia | 53.25 % | |
144 | Belgium | 53.109 % | |
145 | Maldives | 53.002 % | |
146 | Greece | 52.427 % | |
147 | Eswatini | 52.412 % | |
148 | Hungary | 52.408 % | |
149 | Croatia | 52.107 % | |
150 | Bulgaria | 52.014 % | |
151 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.529 % | |
152 | Morocco | 50.623 % | |
153 | Romania | 50.577 % | |
154 | Suriname | 50.533 % | |
155 | Turkmenistan | 50.046 % | |
156 | Pakistan | 50.032 % | |
157 | Senegal | 50 % | |
158 | Sudan | 49.111 % | |
159 | Italy | 48.88 % | |
160 | Malta | 48.85 % | |
161 | Tajikistan | 48.739 % | |
162 | Papua New Guinea | 48.578 % | |
163 | Saudi Arabia | 48.347 % | |
164 | Gabon | 48.294 % | |
165 | Montenegro | 48.191 % | |
166 | Gambia | 48.188 % | |
167 | Puerto Rico | 47.23 % | |
168 | Egypt | 46.97 % | |
169 | Libya | 46.969 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 46.571 % | |
171 | Tunisia | 46.487 % | |
172 | Turkey | 46.272 % | |
173 | Syrian Arab Republic | 45.81 % | |
174 | Iran | 45.293 % | |
175 | Mauritania | 44.772 % | |
176 | Lebanon | 43.606 % | |
177 | Algeria | 43.247 % | |
178 | Comoros | 41.99 % | |
179 | Iraq | 41.768 % | |
180 | Yemen | 41.361 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.172 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 38.63 % | |
183 | Jordan | 37.7 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.407 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 33.635 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.016 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Mozambique
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Qatar
- #6
North Korea
- #7
Nigeria
- #8
Ethiopia
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
Cambodia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Yemen
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Comoros
- #177
Algeria
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2006, Tanzania led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 88.35%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 24.02% to a maximum of 88.35%. The global average for this metric stood at 61.16%. This measure highlights the percentage of young individuals actively engaged in the labor market, either employed or seeking employment.
Economic Structure and Youth Labor Participation
The Youth Labor Force Participation Rate often reflects the economic structure of a country. For instance, in Tanzania (88.35%) and Madagascar (86.53%), high participation rates can be attributed to economies heavily reliant on agriculture and informal sectors. These sectors typically demand labor-intensive work, drawing young individuals into the workforce at an early age. Conversely, countries like Sao Tome and Principe (24.02%) and Djibouti (33.64%) exhibit lower participation rates, potentially due to limited economic opportunities and higher educational enrollment among youth, which delays their entry into the labor market.
Geopolitical Factors Influencing Participation
Geopolitical stability and policy frameworks play significant roles in shaping youth labor participation. In North Korea (82.07%) and Qatar (83.75%), government policies may mandate youth involvement in state-driven economic activities or formal employment. In contrast, regions experiencing conflict or political instability, such as Somalia (34.41%) and the State of Palestine (38.63%), tend to have lower participation rates, as instability disrupts economic activities and employment opportunities.
Demographic and Cultural Influences
Demographic trends and cultural norms also impact youth labor force engagement. In countries like Nigeria (81.96%) and Ethiopia (81.92%), large youth populations coupled with cultural expectations for early work contribute to high participation rates. These nations often have limited social safety nets, encouraging youth to seek employment early. Meanwhile, countries such as Jordan (37.70%) and Algeria (43.25%) might see lower rates due to cultural emphasis on higher education and professional careers, which delays workforce entry.
Year-over-Year Trends and Economic Adjustments
Analyzing year-over-year changes reveals significant economic adjustments. The Republic of Moldova experienced the largest increase, with a +3.28% rise (6.0%), possibly due to economic reforms improving job prospects for youth. Similarly, Peru and Uruguay saw increases of +3.03% (4.1%) and +2.47% (4.1%), respectively, potentially reflecting economic growth and improved labor market conditions. Conversely, Paraguay noted the most substantial decrease at -3.23% (-4.6%), which might indicate economic challenges or shifts away from youth employment opportunities, affecting labor market dynamics.
Overall, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2006 showcases a complex interplay of economic, geopolitical, and cultural factors, with each country's unique circumstances influencing how youth engage with the labor market. Understanding these dynamics provides valuable insights into the broader economic health and developmental trajectory of nations worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2006
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2006?
In 2006, Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate at 88.35%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2006?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2006 was 61.16%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2006?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2006, with 24.02%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2006?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2006 was 61.17%.
How many countries are included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rates in 2006?
The dataset includes youth labor force participation rates for 186 countries in 2006.
What is the range of youth labor force participation rates among the top 10 countries in 2006?
The range of youth labor force participation rates among the top 10 countries in 2006 is from 81.03% to 88.35%.
Insights by country
Portugal
In 2006, Portugal's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 62.047%, ranking #86 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the European Union average, reflecting challenges in integrating young people into the workforce. Key factors influencing this statistic include high youth unemployment rates and a relatively rigid labor market, which can limit opportunities for young job seekers in Portugal.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranked #32 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 71.694% in 2006. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a large youth population and economic reliance on agriculture and mining, which often necessitate the involvement of younger workers in these sectors.
Malaysia
In 2006, Malaysia achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.455%, ranking #103 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to other nations. Contributing factors include Malaysia's transitional economy, which is shifting from agriculture to more industrial and service-oriented sectors, and demographic trends that affect job availability for young people.
Bhutan
In 2006, Bhutan achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 69.532 %, ranking #37 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include Bhutan's focus on sustainable development and the integration of youth into various sectors, driven by government initiatives aimed at enhancing employment opportunities.
Estonia
In 2006, Estonia ranked #102 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.497 %. This rate is lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in youth employment compared to more prosperous neighboring countries like Finland. Key factors influencing this statistic include Estonia's transition to a market economy post-independence, which has affected job availability for young people, and a focus on education that sometimes delays entry into the workforce.
Pakistan
In 2006, Pakistan had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 50.032 %, ranking #156 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include a high population growth rate, limited access to quality education, and economic instability, which hinder the ability of young people to enter the workforce effectively.
Lesotho
In 2006, Lesotho achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 69.213 %, ranking #38 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Lesotho's youthful population and a significant reliance on agriculture, which provides numerous employment opportunities for young people.
Norway
In 2006, Norway's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 68.171%, ranking #41 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong emphasis on youth employment within the country. Key drivers include Norway's robust economy, supported by its oil wealth, and comprehensive education policies that encourage young people to enter the workforce while acquiring relevant skills.
Central African Republic
The Central African Republic ranked #27 globally for Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2006, with a value of 72.549%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a youthful population demographic and limited access to formal education, which often drives young individuals to seek employment in informal sectors.
Vanuatu
In 2006, Vanuatu achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 76.869 %, ranking #20 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include Vanuatu's youthful population and the demand for labor in its tourism and agricultural sectors, which provide ample opportunities for young workers.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data