Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1997
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 86.476 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.148 % | |
3 | Burundi | 85.137 % | |
4 | Mozambique | 83.94 % | |
5 | Nigeria | 83.801 % | |
6 | Qatar | 82.912 % | |
7 | Solomon Islands | 82.873 % | |
8 | Burkina Faso | 82.711 % | |
9 | North Korea | 82.266 % | |
10 | Cameroon | 82.076 % | |
11 | Ethiopia | 81.965 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.846 % | |
13 | Cambodia | 80.548 % | |
14 | Eritrea | 80.479 % | |
15 | Azerbaijan | 79.953 % | |
16 | Niger | 78.89 % | |
17 | Angola | 77.408 % | |
18 | Liberia | 77.152 % | |
19 | Vanuatu | 76.839 % | |
20 | Vietnam | 76.14 % | |
21 | China | 75.762 % | |
22 | Georgia | 75.682 % | |
23 | Thailand | 75.421 % | |
24 | United Arab Emirates | 75.355 % | |
25 | South Sudan | 74.49 % | |
26 | Uganda | 74.135 % | |
27 | Bahamas | 74.128 % | |
28 | Iceland | 73.525 % | |
29 | Lesotho | 73.214 % | |
30 | Central African Republic | 72.684 % | |
31 | Ghana | 72.676 % | |
32 | Kenya | 72.535 % | |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.459 % | |
34 | Benin | 71.955 % | |
35 | Kazakhstan | 71.678 % | |
36 | Timor-Leste | 71.028 % | |
37 | Bolivia | 70.66 % | |
38 | Chad | 70.487 % | |
39 | Mali | 70.369 % | |
40 | Paraguay | 70.158 % | |
41 | Bhutan | 70.157 % | |
42 | Guam | 69.315 % | |
43 | Barbados | 69.031 % | |
44 | Jamaica | 68.464 % | |
45 | Congo | 68.451 % | |
46 | Colombia | 68.295 % | |
47 | Kyrgyzstan | 68.143 % | |
48 | Brunei Darussalam | 67.959 % | |
49 | Myanmar | 67.756 % | |
50 | Switzerland | 67.328 % | |
51 | Netherlands | 67.108 % | |
52 | Kuwait | 66.798 % | |
53 | Guatemala | 66.705 % | |
54 | Indonesia | 66.338 % | |
55 | Zimbabwe | 66.175 % | |
56 | United States | 66.085 % | |
57 | Honduras | 65.977 % | |
58 | Denmark | 65.694 % | |
59 | Peru | 65.69 % | |
60 | China, Macao SAR | 65.63 % | |
61 | New Caledonia | 65.514 % | |
62 | Norway | 65.346 % | |
63 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.213 % | |
64 | Bahrain | 65.141 % | |
65 | New Zealand | 65.005 % | |
66 | Albania | 64.955 % | |
67 | Brazil | 64.787 % | |
68 | Singapore | 64.737 % | |
69 | Venezuela | 64.563 % | |
70 | Sierra Leone | 64.53 % | |
71 | Canada | 64.42 % | |
72 | Ecuador | 64.25 % | |
73 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 64.174 % | |
74 | Haiti | 64.164 % | |
75 | Guinea | 64.026 % | |
76 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.934 % | |
77 | Saint Lucia | 63.7 % | |
78 | Japan | 63.674 % | |
79 | Australia | 63.26 % | |
80 | Rwanda | 63.246 % | |
81 | Armenia | 62.879 % | |
82 | Trinidad and Tobago | 62.821 % | |
83 | Argentina | 62.778 % | |
84 | Sweden | 62.709 % | |
85 | Ireland | 62.393 % | |
86 | South Korea | 62.022 % | |
87 | Laos | 61.99 % | |
88 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.817 % | |
89 | Lithuania | 61.784 % | |
90 | Panama | 61.626 % | |
91 | Estonia | 61.491 % | |
92 | Philippines | 61.248 % | |
93 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 61.179 % | |
94 | Czech Republic | 61.157 % | |
95 | United States Virgin Islands | 61.082 % | |
96 | Israel | 61.025 % | |
97 | United Kingdom | 60.863 % | |
98 | Mexico | 60.784 % | |
99 | Cyprus | 60.735 % | |
100 | Uruguay | 60.66 % | |
101 | El Salvador | 60.51 % | |
102 | Botswana | 60.464 % | |
103 | Finland | 60.107 % | |
104 | Slovakia | 59.676 % | |
105 | Zambia | 59.609 % | |
106 | Republic of Moldova | 59.539 % | |
107 | Latvia | 59.434 % | |
108 | Mauritius | 59.424 % | |
109 | French Polynesia | 59.413 % | |
110 | Fiji | 59.294 % | |
111 | Portugal | 59.144 % | |
112 | Tonga | 59.123 % | |
113 | Mongolia | 59.067 % | |
114 | India | 59.066 % | |
115 | Cabo Verde | 59.051 % | |
116 | Russia | 59.045 % | |
117 | Nicaragua | 58.966 % | |
118 | Belize | 58.9 % | |
119 | Belarus | 58.803 % | |
120 | Togo | 58.709 % | |
121 | Malaysia | 58.529 % | |
122 | Slovenia | 58.513 % | |
123 | Guyana | 58.476 % | |
124 | Germany | 58.233 % | |
125 | Costa Rica | 58.13 % | |
126 | Austria | 58.088 % | |
127 | Dominican Republic | 58.058 % | |
128 | South Africa | 57.953 % | |
129 | Ukraine | 57.902 % | |
130 | Bangladesh | 57.837 % | |
131 | Uzbekistan | 57.408 % | |
132 | Poland | 57.215 % | |
133 | Oman | 57.138 % | |
134 | Turkmenistan | 56.841 % | |
135 | Chile | 56.619 % | |
136 | Samoa | 56.337 % | |
137 | Serbia | 55.975 % | |
138 | Sri Lanka | 55.24 % | |
139 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
140 | France | 54.959 % | |
141 | Eswatini | 53.983 % | |
142 | Croatia | 53.956 % | |
143 | North Macedonia | 53.788 % | |
144 | Namibia | 53.5 % | |
145 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 53.396 % | |
146 | Cuba | 53.16 % | |
147 | Maldives | 52.709 % | |
148 | Turkey | 52.553 % | |
149 | Sudan | 51.593 % | |
150 | Morocco | 51.332 % | |
151 | Luxembourg | 51.242 % | |
152 | Spain | 50.916 % | |
153 | Hungary | 50.836 % | |
154 | Greece | 50.653 % | |
155 | Romania | 50.584 % | |
156 | Senegal | 50.538 % | |
157 | Belgium | 50.488 % | |
158 | Malta | 50.219 % | |
159 | Pakistan | 50.12 % | |
160 | Bulgaria | 50.013 % | |
161 | Montenegro | 49.616 % | |
162 | Syrian Arab Republic | 49.544 % | |
163 | Saudi Arabia | 49.178 % | |
164 | Tunisia | 49.176 % | |
165 | Gambia | 48.353 % | |
166 | Gabon | 48.181 % | |
167 | Papua New Guinea | 48.179 % | |
168 | Puerto Rico | 47.7 % | |
169 | Italy | 47.296 % | |
170 | Suriname | 47.294 % | |
171 | Afghanistan | 46.732 % | |
172 | Egypt | 46.639 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 46.144 % | |
174 | Libya | 46.078 % | |
175 | Yemen | 45.226 % | |
176 | Algeria | 45.059 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.118 % | |
178 | Iran | 43.932 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.26 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.96 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.429 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.262 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.458 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 34.514 % | |
185 | Somalia | 33.995 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.512 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Burundi
- #4
Mozambique
- #5
Nigeria
- #6
Qatar
- #7
Solomon Islands
- #8
Burkina Faso
- #9
North Korea
- #10
Cameroon
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Iran
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1997, the country with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was Tanzania with a rate of 86.48%, while the global range spanned from 24.51% to 86.48%. The average participation rate globally was 61.67%, providing a baseline for understanding youth engagement in the labor market across different regions.
Economic Context Influencing High Participation Rates
The countries with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rates in 1997, such as Tanzania (86.48%), Madagascar (86.15%), and Burundi (85.14%), often reflect underlying economic conditions that necessitate youth employment. In many developing economies, young individuals contribute significantly to household incomes due to limited social safety nets and economic opportunities. For instance, Nigeria's participation rate of 83.80% aligns with its status as Africa's largest economy, where informal sectors play a substantial role in providing employment for the youth.
These high participation rates can also be attributed to limited access to higher education, prompting more young people to enter the workforce early. This trend is prevalent in countries where educational infrastructure is still developing, thereby influencing youth employment patterns.
Low Participation Rates and Socioeconomic Factors
Conversely, countries like Sao Tome and Principe (24.51%) and Somalia (34.00%) exhibited some of the lowest youth participation rates. These figures often reflect different socioeconomic dynamics, such as political instability, conflict, or strong cultural emphasis on education over immediate workforce entry. For instance, in Jordan (39.46%) and the State of Palestine (40.26%), cultural norms and educational policies may prioritize schooling, resulting in lower youth engagement in the labor market.
In regions with ongoing conflicts or political unrest, such as Somalia and Djibouti (34.51%), instability can disrupt economic activities, leading to lower labor force participation among youth.
Year-over-Year Trends and Shifts
Analyzing the year-over-year changes, Turkmenistan experienced the most significant increase in youth participation, rising by 2.25% (4.1%). This uptick could be attributed to economic reforms or shifts in labor market policies that encouraged youth employment. Similarly, Costa Rica saw a growth of 2.16% (3.9%), possibly reflecting economic diversification and increased job opportunities for younger demographics.
On the other hand, Georgia witnessed the largest decline, with a 1.63% (2.1%) decrease, which might be linked to economic transitions or shifts in educational policies that encouraged prolonged schooling. Other countries like Kyrgyzstan (-1.38%) and Russia (-1.34%) also saw declines, potentially due to similar socio-economic factors or increased educational participation.
Impact of Urbanization on Youth Labor Force Participation
Urbanization plays a pivotal role in shaping youth labor force participation. In rapidly urbanizing countries, such as Mozambique (83.94%) and Nigeria, the demand for labor in urban centers can drive higher participation rates as youth migrate in search of employment opportunities. These urban areas often provide diverse job markets, attracting young people from rural regions where employment opportunities are scarce.
In contrast, countries with slower urbanization rates might see lower participation, as rural economies often have limited job opportunities outside agriculture. This is evident in nations like Nepal (41.43%) and Comoros (41.96%), where rural livelihoods dominate and urbanization is less pronounced.
In summary, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1997 highlights diverse economic, cultural, and policy-driven factors that influence youth engagement in the labor market. Understanding these dynamics provides valuable insights into how young populations contribute to national economies and the global labor market.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1997
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1997?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1997, with 86.48%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1997?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1997, with 24.51%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1997?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1997 was 61.67%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate among countries in 1997?
The median youth labor force participation rate among countries in 1997 was 61.17%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 1997?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 1997 were Tanzania (86.48%), Madagascar (86.15%), and Burundi (85.14%).
How many countries were included in the youth labor force participation dataset for 1997?
The dataset for youth labor force participation in 1997 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
Cyprus
In 1997, Cyprus had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.735 %, ranking #99 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a relatively strong economic environment for youth employment during that period. Key drivers of this participation rate included Cyprus's robust service sector, particularly in tourism and finance, which provided numerous job opportunities for young people entering the labor market.
China, Hong Kong SAR
In 1997, China, Hong Kong SAR had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.179%, ranking #93 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than the global average, reflecting the region's unique economic landscape during a period of transition. The high participation rate can be attributed to a strong demand for labor in the service sector and the influx of young individuals into the workforce as the economy began to open up and modernize.
Nigeria
In 1997, Nigeria achieved a remarkable 5th place globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 83.801 %. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic profile and economic conditions that necessitate early workforce entry. Factors such as high population growth and limited access to formal education compel many young Nigerians to seek employment opportunities at an early age.
Algeria
In 1997, Algeria had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 45.059 %, ranking #176 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably low compared to many other nations, reflecting significant challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include Algeria's economic reliance on oil and gas exports, which limits job creation in diverse sectors, and high youth unemployment rates exacerbated by a growing population. Additionally, the country's educational system has struggled to align with labor market needs, further impacting youth participation.
Solomon Islands
In 1997, the Solomon Islands achieved a remarkable 7th place globally for its Youth Labor Force Participation Rate, which stood at 82.873 %. This high rate is significantly above the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic structure and the necessity for income generation in rural communities. Economic factors, such as limited formal job opportunities and a reliance on subsistence agriculture, drive many young individuals to participate in the labor force at an early age.
Albania
In 1997, Albania had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 64.955 %, ranking #66 out of 186 countries. This rate indicates a relatively high engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many European nations, reflecting the challenges faced during the post-communist transition period. Economic reforms, urban migration, and a demand for labor in emerging sectors contributed to this participation rate, as many young Albanians sought opportunities in a rapidly changing economy.
Burundi
In 1997, Burundi achieved a remarkable global rank of #3 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 85.137%. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting the country's unique demographic dynamics. A youthful population, coupled with limited educational opportunities, has driven many young Burundians into the labor market, often in informal sectors. Additionally, economic factors such as subsistence agriculture play a crucial role in shaping this high participation rate.
Denmark
In 1997, Denmark had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.694 %, ranking #58 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting Denmark's robust education system and strong labor market policies. Key drivers include the country's emphasis on vocational training and apprenticeship programs, which effectively integrate youth into the workforce, alongside a supportive welfare state that encourages employment among young people.
Comoros
In 1997, Comoros had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 41.96%, ranking #180 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than many neighboring nations, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Factors contributing to this low participation include high unemployment rates and limited economic diversification, which restrict job availability for young individuals in the archipelago.
Myanmar
In 1997, Myanmar had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.756 %, ranking #49 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include Myanmar's young population and economic conditions that necessitated early workforce entry, particularly in agriculture and informal sectors. Additionally, limited access to education and vocational training pushed many young people into jobs rather than further studies.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data