Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2017
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qatar | 87.498 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 85.647 % | |
3 | Solomon Islands | 84.32 % | |
4 | Tanzania | 83.86 % | |
5 | North Korea | 82.094 % | |
6 | Cambodia | 81.409 % | |
7 | Nigeria | 80.89 % | |
8 | Burundi | 80.093 % | |
9 | Eritrea | 78.996 % | |
10 | Mozambique | 78.983 % | |
11 | United Arab Emirates | 78.759 % | |
12 | Burkina Faso | 78.122 % | |
13 | Vietnam | 77.2 % | |
14 | Peru | 76.996 % | |
15 | Liberia | 76.91 % | |
16 | Iceland | 76.892 % | |
17 | Angola | 75.609 % | |
18 | Ethiopia | 74.758 % | |
19 | Benin | 74.315 % | |
20 | South Sudan | 74.269 % | |
21 | Bahamas | 74.159 % | |
22 | Central African Republic | 73.425 % | |
23 | Kuwait | 73.388 % | |
24 | Niger | 72.892 % | |
25 | Bahrain | 72.389 % | |
26 | Kenya | 72.306 % | |
27 | Uganda | 71.759 % | |
28 | Paraguay | 71.039 % | |
29 | Oman | 70.708 % | |
30 | New Zealand | 70.48 % | |
31 | Kazakhstan | 70.23 % | |
32 | China, Macao SAR | 69.862 % | |
33 | Saint Lucia | 69.369 % | |
34 | Cameroon | 69.308 % | |
35 | Mali | 69.159 % | |
36 | Singapore | 68.943 % | |
37 | Bolivia | 68.634 % | |
38 | Switzerland | 68.538 % | |
39 | China | 68.35 % | |
40 | Republic of Moldova | 68.331 % | |
41 | Congo | 68.156 % | |
42 | Ecuador | 68.154 % | |
43 | Thailand | 67.525 % | |
44 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 67.132 % | |
45 | Timor-Leste | 67.058 % | |
46 | Ghana | 66.855 % | |
47 | Indonesia | 66.694 % | |
48 | Barbados | 66.166 % | |
49 | Netherlands | 66.126 % | |
50 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 66.121 % | |
51 | Colombia | 66.013 % | |
52 | Zimbabwe | 65.989 % | |
53 | Haiti | 65.922 % | |
54 | Panama | 65.872 % | |
55 | Georgia | 65.832 % | |
56 | Canada | 65.792 % | |
57 | Jamaica | 65.674 % | |
58 | Norway | 65.659 % | |
59 | Israel | 65.491 % | |
60 | Nicaragua | 65.333 % | |
61 | Australia | 65.248 % | |
62 | Malaysia | 65.202 % | |
63 | Brunei Darussalam | 65.191 % | |
64 | Azerbaijan | 65.038 % | |
65 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 64.756 % | |
66 | Brazil | 64.525 % | |
67 | Belarus | 64.479 % | |
68 | Sweden | 64.391 % | |
69 | Cyprus | 64.377 % | |
70 | Honduras | 64.359 % | |
71 | Uruguay | 64.114 % | |
72 | Belize | 64.034 % | |
73 | Malawi | 63.467 % | |
74 | Estonia | 63.244 % | |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | 63 % | |
76 | Chile | 62.951 % | |
77 | South Korea | 62.91 % | |
78 | Bhutan | 62.782 % | |
79 | Botswana | 62.766 % | |
80 | United States | 62.548 % | |
81 | Russia | 62.496 % | |
82 | United Kingdom | 62.412 % | |
83 | Dominican Republic | 62.367 % | |
84 | Guam | 62.355 % | |
85 | Myanmar | 62.023 % | |
86 | Ireland | 61.921 % | |
87 | Denmark | 61.827 % | |
88 | Trinidad and Tobago | 61.563 % | |
89 | Armenia | 61.462 % | |
90 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.305 % | |
91 | Guatemala | 60.943 % | |
92 | Latvia | 60.786 % | |
93 | Austria | 60.665 % | |
94 | Germany | 60.659 % | |
95 | Lithuania | 60.612 % | |
96 | Chad | 60.505 % | |
97 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.466 % | |
98 | Rwanda | 60.461 % | |
99 | Japan | 60.444 % | |
100 | Lesotho | 60.243 % | |
101 | Mexico | 60.209 % | |
102 | New Caledonia | 60.205 % | |
103 | Czech Republic | 60.073 % | |
104 | Vanuatu | 59.909 % | |
105 | Venezuela | 59.903 % | |
106 | Slovakia | 59.893 % | |
107 | Mauritius | 59.887 % | |
108 | Costa Rica | 59.848 % | |
109 | Laos | 59.782 % | |
110 | Namibia | 59.668 % | |
111 | Maldives | 59.181 % | |
112 | Cabo Verde | 59.18 % | |
113 | Philippines | 59.141 % | |
114 | Mongolia | 59.138 % | |
115 | United States Virgin Islands | 59.135 % | |
116 | El Salvador | 59.006 % | |
117 | Saudi Arabia | 58.99 % | |
118 | Portugal | 58.881 % | |
119 | Argentina | 58.808 % | |
120 | Luxembourg | 58.737 % | |
121 | Finland | 58.667 % | |
122 | Zambia | 58.577 % | |
123 | Slovenia | 58.552 % | |
124 | Bangladesh | 58.328 % | |
125 | Togo | 58.074 % | |
126 | Albania | 58.057 % | |
127 | Spain | 58.047 % | |
128 | Hungary | 57.834 % | |
129 | Malta | 57.657 % | |
130 | Poland | 57.562 % | |
131 | Fiji | 57.457 % | |
132 | Kyrgyzstan | 56.868 % | |
133 | Uzbekistan | 56.468 % | |
134 | Ukraine | 56.305 % | |
135 | Suriname | 56.138 % | |
136 | French Polynesia | 55.822 % | |
137 | Guyana | 55.599 % | |
138 | Cuba | 55.556 % | |
139 | Bulgaria | 55.405 % | |
140 | South Africa | 55.359 % | |
141 | France | 55.258 % | |
142 | Sierra Leone | 54.675 % | |
143 | Samoa | 54.432 % | |
144 | Tonga | 54.349 % | |
145 | Guinea | 54.278 % | |
146 | Sri Lanka | 53.991 % | |
147 | Serbia | 53.554 % | |
148 | Belgium | 53.336 % | |
149 | North Macedonia | 53.157 % | |
150 | Turkey | 52.832 % | |
151 | India | 52.671 % | |
152 | Montenegro | 52.64 % | |
153 | Romania | 51.837 % | |
154 | Croatia | 51.388 % | |
155 | Pakistan | 51.338 % | |
156 | Gabon | 51.043 % | |
157 | Greece | 51.022 % | |
158 | Eswatini | 50.838 % | |
159 | Papua New Guinea | 50.418 % | |
160 | Italy | 49.501 % | |
161 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 49.408 % | |
162 | Libya | 49.329 % | |
163 | Comoros | 49.253 % | |
164 | Lebanon | 47.973 % | |
165 | Gambia | 47.773 % | |
166 | Tunisia | 47.488 % | |
167 | Afghanistan | 47.305 % | |
168 | Senegal | 46.002 % | |
169 | Morocco | 45.5 % | |
170 | Egypt | 44.95 % | |
171 | Iran | 44.235 % | |
172 | State of Palestine | 44.004 % | |
173 | Turkmenistan | 43.115 % | |
174 | Sudan | 42.409 % | |
175 | Algeria | 42.325 % | |
176 | Iraq | 41.89 % | |
177 | Mauritania | 41.102 % | |
178 | Jordan | 40.226 % | |
179 | Nepal | 39.915 % | |
180 | Tajikistan | 38.877 % | |
181 | Puerto Rico | 38.236 % | |
182 | Syrian Arab Republic | 37.742 % | |
183 | Somalia | 34.102 % | |
184 | Yemen | 32.47 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 32.272 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 23.88 % |
- #1
Qatar
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Solomon Islands
- #4
Tanzania
- #5
North Korea
- #6
Cambodia
- #7
Nigeria
- #8
Burundi
- #9
Eritrea
- #10
Mozambique
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Yemen
- #183
Somalia
- #182
Syrian Arab Republic
- #181
Puerto Rico
- #180
Tajikistan
- #179
Nepal
- #178
Jordan
- #177
Mauritania
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2017, the country with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was Qatar at 87.50%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 23.88% to a maximum of 87.50%. The global average Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 60.80%, providing a benchmark for understanding participation across 186 countries.
Economic and Cultural Drivers of High Participation Rates
Countries with the highest youth labor force participation rates, such as Qatar (87.50%) and Madagascar (85.65%), often share common economic and cultural characteristics. In Qatar, the high participation rate can be attributed to the country's robust economy and substantial investment in sectors that actively engage young workers. Meanwhile, in countries like Madagascar and Tanzania (83.86%), agricultural sectors dominate, requiring substantial labor input, including from the youth.
In regions where economic necessity drives participation, such as Burundi (80.09%) and Nigeria (80.89%), the lack of extensive social safety nets compels young individuals to enter the workforce early. This necessity often overrides educational pursuits, reflecting a trade-off between immediate economic needs and long-term educational goals.
Socioeconomic Challenges Impacting Low Participation Rates
The countries with the lowest youth labor force participation rates, such as Sao Tome and Principe (23.88%) and Djibouti (32.27%), often face significant socioeconomic challenges. Political instability, as seen in the Syrian Arab Republic (37.74%) and Yemen (32.47%), disrupts economic activities and limits opportunities for youth employment. These conditions result in a higher prevalence of unemployment and underemployment among young people.
In Nepal (39.92%) and Jordan (40.23%), cultural factors and educational priorities may also play a role. Societies that place a strong emphasis on prolonged education can see reduced immediate labor force participation among the youth, as students remain in educational institutions longer before transitioning into the workforce.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The year 2017 saw an average global change in youth labor force participation of -0.06%, indicating a slight decline. Notably, Maldives experienced a significant increase of 2.29% (4.0%), driven by economic diversification efforts that opened new employment avenues for young people. Similarly, Bangladesh saw a 2.24% (4.0%) increase, likely due to expanding industrial sectors that actively recruit young workers.
Conversely, Senegal experienced the largest decrease of 4.11% (-8.2%), possibly reflecting economic challenges or policy changes that affected youth employment. In the Philippines (-2.45%) and Kyrgyzstan (-2.35%), declining participation rates may be linked to shifts in economic conditions or increased emphasis on education over immediate employment.
Policy Implications and Future Outlook
The variations in youth labor force participation rates across countries underscore the importance of targeted economic and educational policies. In countries with high participation rates driven by necessity, policies that balance education and employment can help achieve sustainable economic growth. For nations with lower rates, addressing barriers to employment through policy reform and economic development can improve youth engagement in the labor market.
As global economies evolve, understanding these participation patterns and their underlying causes will be crucial for policymakers aiming to harness the potential of the youth workforce effectively. Continued monitoring and adaptive strategies will be key to addressing both the challenges and opportunities presented by youth labor force dynamics in the coming years.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2017
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2017?
Qatar had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2017, with a rate of 87.5%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2017?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2017, with a rate of 23.88%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2017?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2017 was 60.8%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2017?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2017 was 60.66%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2017?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2017 were Qatar (87.5%), Madagascar (85.65%), and Solomon Islands (84.32%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2017?
The dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2017 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
India
In 2017, India ranked #151 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 52.671%. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to higher-performing nations. Contributing factors include a rapidly growing population, limited job creation in formal sectors, and educational mismatches that hinder youth from entering the workforce effectively.
Afghanistan
In 2017, Afghanistan ranked #167 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 47.305%. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in economic stability and educational access. Factors such as prolonged conflict, limited job opportunities, and a predominantly young population contribute to this low participation, highlighting the urgent need for policies that promote youth employment and vocational training.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria ranked #139 globally in 2017 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 55.405 %. This rate is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in youth employment compared to neighboring countries like Romania, which has a higher participation rate. Contributing factors include Bulgaria's economic transition post-communism, high youth unemployment rates, and a mismatch between education and labor market needs.
Ecuador
Ecuador's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2017 was 68.154 %, ranking it #42 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's unique demographic dynamics and economic conditions. A significant driver of this participation is the necessity for families to supplement household income in a challenging economic environment, combined with a relatively youthful population eager to enter the workforce.
Latvia
In 2017, Latvia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.786%, ranking #92 out of 186 countries. This rate is below the European Union average, indicating challenges in integrating young people into the workforce compared to neighboring countries. Key drivers of this statistic include a relatively high unemployment rate among youth and the ongoing economic transition, which affects job availability and skills alignment in the labor market.
Armenia
In 2017, Armenia ranked #89 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.462%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a relatively active youth demographic in the labor market. Key drivers of this participation include Armenia's economic transition post-Soviet Union, which has fostered a need for young workers in various sectors, as well as a growing emphasis on education and vocational training.
El Salvador
In 2017, El Salvador had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.006%, ranking #116 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's significant youth demographic engaged in the workforce. Key drivers include El Salvador's economic reliance on agriculture and remittances, which compel young individuals to seek employment opportunities early to support their families.
Iran
In 2017, Iran ranked #171 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 44.235%. This rate is significantly lower than many countries in the region, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Economic sanctions, high inflation, and limited job creation have contributed to this low participation, alongside a demographic profile where a large youth population faces a competitive job market.
Belarus
In 2017, Belarus ranked #67 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 64.479%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a relatively engaged youth demographic in the labor market compared to many countries. Key drivers include Belarus's emphasis on education and vocational training, which equips young people with skills that are aligned with the labor market needs.
Spain
In 2017, Spain had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 58.047 %, ranking #127 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in youth employment across the region. High youth unemployment rates, coupled with economic recovery from the financial crisis, have hindered job opportunities for young people in Spain.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data