Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1995
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Burundi | 86.881 % | |
2 | Tanzania | 86.435 % | |
3 | Madagascar | 86.078 % | |
4 | Nigeria | 84.095 % | |
5 | Mozambique | 83.976 % | |
6 | Qatar | 83.836 % | |
7 | Burkina Faso | 83.125 % | |
8 | Solomon Islands | 82.542 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 82.168 % | |
10 | North Korea | 82.047 % | |
11 | Ethiopia | 81.891 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.837 % | |
13 | Cambodia | 80.497 % | |
14 | Azerbaijan | 80.495 % | |
15 | Eritrea | 80.404 % | |
16 | Georgia | 79.129 % | |
17 | Niger | 78.857 % | |
18 | Angola | 77.415 % | |
19 | Vietnam | 77.315 % | |
20 | Liberia | 77.21 % | |
21 | Vanuatu | 76.9 % | |
22 | China | 76.773 % | |
23 | United Arab Emirates | 76.16 % | |
24 | Iceland | 75.669 % | |
25 | Thailand | 75.254 % | |
26 | South Sudan | 74.447 % | |
27 | Bahamas | 73.81 % | |
28 | Uganda | 73.789 % | |
29 | Lesotho | 73.423 % | |
30 | Ghana | 72.803 % | |
31 | Kenya | 72.67 % | |
32 | Central African Republic | 72.658 % | |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.099 % | |
34 | Kazakhstan | 72.062 % | |
35 | Benin | 72.037 % | |
36 | Chad | 71.402 % | |
37 | Timor-Leste | 71.286 % | |
38 | Kyrgyzstan | 70.455 % | |
39 | Mali | 70.403 % | |
40 | Guam | 70.303 % | |
41 | Bhutan | 70.228 % | |
42 | Bolivia | 70.085 % | |
43 | Paraguay | 70.044 % | |
44 | Barbados | 69.691 % | |
45 | Jamaica | 69.396 % | |
46 | Congo | 68.46 % | |
47 | Colombia | 68.095 % | |
48 | Myanmar | 67.901 % | |
49 | Brunei Darussalam | 67.612 % | |
50 | Kuwait | 67.251 % | |
51 | Indonesia | 66.834 % | |
52 | Netherlands | 66.815 % | |
53 | Zimbabwe | 66.674 % | |
54 | Guatemala | 66.623 % | |
55 | United States Virgin Islands | 65.989 % | |
56 | Honduras | 65.949 % | |
57 | Brazil | 65.663 % | |
58 | United States | 65.604 % | |
59 | Bahrain | 65.43 % | |
60 | New Caledonia | 65.342 % | |
61 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.321 % | |
62 | Denmark | 65.251 % | |
63 | Haiti | 65.08 % | |
64 | Albania | 64.732 % | |
65 | Sierra Leone | 64.478 % | |
66 | Venezuela | 64.441 % | |
67 | Canada | 64.404 % | |
68 | New Zealand | 64.312 % | |
69 | Switzerland | 64.087 % | |
70 | Guinea-Bissau | 64.003 % | |
71 | Norway | 63.947 % | |
72 | Armenia | 63.909 % | |
73 | Guinea | 63.902 % | |
74 | Rwanda | 63.764 % | |
75 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 63.752 % | |
76 | Singapore | 63.683 % | |
77 | Australia | 63.678 % | |
78 | Ecuador | 63.498 % | |
79 | Saint Lucia | 63.474 % | |
80 | Japan | 63.419 % | |
81 | China, Macao SAR | 63.287 % | |
82 | Lithuania | 63.253 % | |
83 | Sweden | 63.222 % | |
84 | Peru | 62.92 % | |
85 | El Salvador | 62.371 % | |
86 | Laos | 62.159 % | |
87 | Israel | 62.124 % | |
88 | Estonia | 61.843 % | |
89 | Ireland | 61.718 % | |
90 | Trinidad and Tobago | 61.682 % | |
91 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 61.666 % | |
92 | Czech Republic | 61.552 % | |
93 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.529 % | |
94 | Argentina | 61.511 % | |
95 | South Korea | 61.46 % | |
96 | Russia | 61.413 % | |
97 | Philippines | 61.374 % | |
98 | Panama | 61.307 % | |
99 | Botswana | 61.287 % | |
100 | Cyprus | 60.771 % | |
101 | United Kingdom | 60.628 % | |
102 | Latvia | 60.44 % | |
103 | Slovakia | 59.827 % | |
104 | Mauritius | 59.753 % | |
105 | Finland | 59.715 % | |
106 | Tonga | 59.688 % | |
107 | Belarus | 59.643 % | |
108 | French Polynesia | 59.629 % | |
109 | Zambia | 59.605 % | |
110 | Cabo Verde | 59.579 % | |
111 | Fiji | 59.545 % | |
112 | Mexico | 59.401 % | |
113 | Republic of Moldova | 59.377 % | |
114 | Guyana | 59.27 % | |
115 | Uruguay | 59.19 % | |
116 | Austria | 58.884 % | |
117 | Togo | 58.861 % | |
118 | Mongolia | 58.811 % | |
119 | Poland | 58.69 % | |
120 | India | 58.395 % | |
121 | Ukraine | 58.363 % | |
122 | Portugal | 58.26 % | |
123 | Germany | 58.253 % | |
124 | Oman | 58.245 % | |
125 | Costa Rica | 58.03 % | |
126 | South Africa | 58.024 % | |
127 | Nicaragua | 57.91 % | |
128 | Uzbekistan | 57.797 % | |
129 | Malaysia | 57.773 % | |
130 | Slovenia | 57.742 % | |
131 | Dominican Republic | 57.645 % | |
132 | Serbia | 57.555 % | |
133 | Bangladesh | 57.533 % | |
134 | Belize | 57.019 % | |
135 | Samoa | 56.334 % | |
136 | Chile | 56.03 % | |
137 | Turkmenistan | 55.348 % | |
138 | France | 55.054 % | |
139 | Croatia | 55.043 % | |
140 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
141 | Sri Lanka | 54.88 % | |
142 | Namibia | 54.554 % | |
143 | North Macedonia | 54.381 % | |
144 | Eswatini | 54.35 % | |
145 | Turkey | 54.125 % | |
146 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 53.83 % | |
147 | Cuba | 52.604 % | |
148 | Sudan | 51.397 % | |
149 | Morocco | 51.353 % | |
150 | Maldives | 51.31 % | |
151 | Hungary | 50.929 % | |
152 | Senegal | 50.7 % | |
153 | Belgium | 50.439 % | |
154 | Romania | 50.382 % | |
155 | Greece | 50.344 % | |
156 | Luxembourg | 50.339 % | |
157 | Montenegro | 50.164 % | |
158 | Saudi Arabia | 50.127 % | |
159 | Spain | 50.116 % | |
160 | Malta | 49.866 % | |
161 | Bulgaria | 49.656 % | |
162 | Syrian Arab Republic | 49.193 % | |
163 | Tunisia | 49.107 % | |
164 | Gabon | 48.381 % | |
165 | Pakistan | 48.36 % | |
166 | Gambia | 48.289 % | |
167 | Papua New Guinea | 48.1 % | |
168 | Suriname | 47.98 % | |
169 | Egypt | 47.92 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 46.876 % | |
171 | Italy | 46.868 % | |
172 | Mauritania | 46.24 % | |
173 | Puerto Rico | 46.1 % | |
174 | Libya | 45.78 % | |
175 | Algeria | 45.601 % | |
176 | Iran | 44.599 % | |
177 | Yemen | 44.479 % | |
178 | Lebanon | 44.263 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.329 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.952 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.5 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.293 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.441 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 34.795 % | |
185 | Somalia | 33.921 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.64 % |
- #1
Burundi
- #2
Tanzania
- #3
Madagascar
- #4
Nigeria
- #5
Mozambique
- #6
Qatar
- #7
Burkina Faso
- #8
Solomon Islands
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
North Korea
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Lebanon
- #177
Yemen
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1995, the country with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was Burundi at 86.88%, while the global range for this metric spanned from 24.64% in Sao Tome and Principe to Burundi's leading figure. The global average for the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1995 was 61.75%, providing a benchmark for understanding the distribution of youth engagement in the labor market across different nations.
Economic Conditions and High Participation Rates
Countries with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rates, such as Burundi (86.88%), Tanzania (86.44%), and Madagascar (86.08%), often share common economic characteristics. These nations typically have predominantly agrarian economies where young individuals contribute significantly to family income through agricultural work. Limited access to higher education and vocational training in these countries often necessitates early entry into the workforce. For instance, in Nigeria (84.10%), Africa's largest economy, the informal sector plays a crucial role in absorbing young labor, further driving up participation rates.
Low Participation Rates and Sociopolitical Factors
On the opposite end, countries such as Sao Tome and Principe (24.64%), Somalia (33.92%), and Djibouti (34.80%) exhibit significantly lower youth participation rates. These low numbers can often be attributed to a combination of political instability, limited economic opportunities, and cultural factors that prioritize education over immediate workforce entry. For example, in Jordan (39.44%) and the State of Palestine (40.29%), political tensions and economic challenges have historically constrained labor market opportunities for the youth.
Year-over-Year Trends: Movers and Shakers
While the average change in Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1995 was minimal at -0.02%, certain countries experienced notable shifts. Iceland saw the most significant increase of 2.49% (3.4%), likely driven by economic growth and labor market reforms that encouraged youth employment. Similarly, Peru increased by 2.14% (3.5%), potentially reflecting improvements in economic stability following structural adjustments in the early 1990s.
Conversely, the United States Virgin Islands experienced the largest decrease at -4.58% (-6.5%), possibly due to economic downturns or shifts in educational policies that encouraged longer schooling and delayed workforce entry. Sri Lanka and Albania also saw declines of -2.16% (-3.8%) and -1.87% (-2.8%), respectively, which may be linked to similar educational expansions or economic challenges.
Policy Implications and Future Directions
The data from 1995 highlights significant disparities in youth labor force participation across the globe, driven by a mix of economic, educational, and sociopolitical factors. For countries with high participation rates, policies that enhance educational opportunities and vocational training could help balance workforce demands with personal development goals. In nations with low participation rates, particularly those affected by political instability or economic hardship, targeted interventions to create job opportunities and stabilize the economy could incentivize greater youth engagement in the labor market.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to optimize youth labor participation, ensuring that young individuals are not only contributing to their economies but are also equipped with the skills necessary for sustained personal and professional growth.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1995
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1995?
Burundi had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1995, with 86.88%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1995?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1995, with 24.64%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1995?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1995 was 61.75%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 1995?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 1995 was 61.52%.
Can you list the top 3 countries by youth labor force participation rate in 1995?
The top 3 countries in 1995 were Burundi with 86.88%, Tanzania with 86.44%, and Madagascar with 86.08%.
How many countries are included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 1995?
The dataset includes 186 countries for the youth labor force participation rate in 1995.
Insights by country
Morocco
In 1995, Morocco had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 51.353 %, ranking #149 out of 186 countries. This rate was relatively low compared to regional averages in North Africa, where economic challenges often limit youth employment opportunities. Key drivers for this statistic include Morocco's high youth population and a lack of sufficient job creation in sectors that typically employ young workers, such as agriculture and manufacturing.
Afghanistan
In 1995, Afghanistan had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 46.876 %, ranking #170 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by Afghan youth in accessing employment opportunities. The ongoing conflict and instability in the region, coupled with limited economic development and educational opportunities, have hindered youth engagement in the labor market.
Albania
In 1995, Albania's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 64.732 %, ranking #64 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than many of its regional neighbors, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the labor market during a period of post-communist transition. The high participation rate can be attributed to the country's economic reforms and the urgent need for income among young people in a challenging economic landscape.
Guatemala
In 1995, Guatemala ranked #54 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.623 %. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the labor market. Key drivers include Guatemala's youthful population and economic necessity, as many families rely on the income generated by young workers in both formal and informal sectors.
Czech Republic
In 1995, the Czech Republic ranked #92 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.552%. This figure was slightly below the global average, reflecting challenges faced by youth in entering the labor market during a period of economic transition following the dissolution of Czechoslovakia. Key factors influencing this rate included the restructuring of the economy, which shifted from state-controlled to market-oriented, leading to significant job losses in traditional sectors and affecting youth employment opportunities.
Gambia
In 1995, Gambia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 48.289 %, ranking #166 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than many of its regional neighbors, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include a limited economic base largely dependent on agriculture and a high level of youth unemployment, which restricts job creation and access for young people in the labor market.
Chad
In 1995, Chad had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 71.402 %, ranking #36 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant level of youth engagement in the labor market. Contributing factors include a youthful population and economic conditions that necessitate early entry into the workforce, often driven by agricultural and informal sector employment.
France
In 1995, France had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 55.054 %, ranking #138 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in integrating young people into the workforce. Contributing factors included high youth unemployment rates and a strong emphasis on education, which often delayed entry into the job market for many young individuals.
Comoros
In 1995, Comoros had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 41.952%, ranking #180 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than the global average, reflecting the challenges faced by youth in entering the labor market. Contributing factors include the country's limited economic opportunities, high unemployment rates, and a reliance on subsistence agriculture, which often does not provide formal employment for young people.
Myanmar
In 1995, Myanmar had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.901 %, ranking #48 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably higher than many of its Southeast Asian neighbors, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market during this period. Contributing factors include a predominantly young population and the need for economic participation in a developing economy, where agricultural and informal sectors dominate employment opportunities.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data