Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2005
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 87.987 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.503 % | |
3 | Mozambique | 85.02 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.453 % | |
5 | Qatar | 82.562 % | |
6 | Nigeria | 82.172 % | |
7 | North Korea | 82.04 % | |
8 | Ethiopia | 82.019 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 81.765 % | |
10 | Burkina Faso | 80.973 % | |
11 | Cambodia | 80.826 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.81 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 79.992 % | |
14 | Niger | 79.287 % | |
15 | Burundi | 78.43 % | |
16 | Angola | 77.27 % | |
17 | Liberia | 77.085 % | |
18 | Vanuatu | 76.998 % | |
19 | United Arab Emirates | 76.708 % | |
20 | Iceland | 75.73 % | |
21 | South Sudan | 74.336 % | |
22 | Vietnam | 74.247 % | |
23 | Bahamas | 74.217 % | |
24 | Uganda | 74.029 % | |
25 | Peru | 73.114 % | |
26 | Kenya | 73.113 % | |
27 | Thailand | 73.038 % | |
28 | China | 72.605 % | |
29 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.581 % | |
30 | Central African Republic | 72.535 % | |
31 | Ghana | 72.166 % | |
32 | Benin | 71.793 % | |
33 | Paraguay | 70.279 % | |
34 | Mali | 70.241 % | |
35 | Barbados | 69.968 % | |
36 | Georgia | 69.941 % | |
37 | Lesotho | 69.759 % | |
38 | Bhutan | 69.471 % | |
39 | Kazakhstan | 69.45 % | |
40 | Timor-Leste | 69.449 % | |
41 | Bolivia | 69.294 % | |
42 | Kuwait | 68.302 % | |
43 | Brazil | 68.05 % | |
44 | Congo | 67.918 % | |
45 | Norway | 67.907 % | |
46 | Brunei Darussalam | 67.792 % | |
47 | Netherlands | 67.204 % | |
48 | New Zealand | 67.194 % | |
49 | Ecuador | 66.977 % | |
50 | Switzerland | 66.96 % | |
51 | Canada | 66.731 % | |
52 | Chad | 66.663 % | |
53 | Azerbaijan | 66.542 % | |
54 | Trinidad and Tobago | 66.464 % | |
55 | Myanmar | 66.343 % | |
56 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 66.228 % | |
57 | Denmark | 65.933 % | |
58 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 65.832 % | |
59 | Bahrain | 65.695 % | |
60 | Ireland | 65.665 % | |
61 | Zimbabwe | 65.624 % | |
62 | Colombia | 65.339 % | |
63 | Saint Lucia | 65.332 % | |
64 | Sierra Leone | 65.234 % | |
65 | Singapore | 65.197 % | |
66 | Jamaica | 65.177 % | |
67 | United States | 65.049 % | |
68 | Kyrgyzstan | 64.814 % | |
69 | New Caledonia | 64.704 % | |
70 | Panama | 64.54 % | |
71 | Australia | 64.509 % | |
72 | Indonesia | 64.399 % | |
73 | Venezuela | 64.275 % | |
74 | China, Macao SAR | 63.911 % | |
75 | Haiti | 63.83 % | |
76 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.6 % | |
77 | Cyprus | 63.297 % | |
78 | Sweden | 63.236 % | |
79 | Guatemala | 62.674 % | |
80 | United States Virgin Islands | 62.524 % | |
81 | Guinea | 62.459 % | |
82 | Finland | 62.21 % | |
83 | Nicaragua | 61.921 % | |
84 | Portugal | 61.843 % | |
85 | Israel | 61.799 % | |
86 | Honduras | 61.667 % | |
87 | United Kingdom | 61.666 % | |
88 | Philippines | 61.589 % | |
89 | South Korea | 61.558 % | |
90 | Argentina | 61.511 % | |
91 | Laos | 61.326 % | |
92 | Costa Rica | 61.309 % | |
93 | Rwanda | 61.183 % | |
94 | Guam | 61.1 % | |
95 | Russia | 60.914 % | |
96 | Armenia | 60.768 % | |
97 | Belarus | 60.761 % | |
98 | Belize | 60.74 % | |
99 | El Salvador | 60.6 % | |
100 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.567 % | |
101 | Japan | 60.418 % | |
102 | Malaysia | 60.267 % | |
103 | Mexico | 60.12 % | |
104 | Botswana | 59.665 % | |
105 | Uruguay | 59.514 % | |
106 | Slovakia | 59.463 % | |
107 | Czech Republic | 59.42 % | |
108 | Slovenia | 59.342 % | |
109 | Zambia | 59.301 % | |
110 | India | 59.289 % | |
111 | Mauritius | 59.266 % | |
112 | Mongolia | 59.261 % | |
113 | Equatorial Guinea | 59.035 % | |
114 | Estonia | 58.608 % | |
115 | Germany | 58.332 % | |
116 | Togo | 58.267 % | |
117 | Bangladesh | 58.12 % | |
118 | Austria | 58.064 % | |
119 | Tonga | 57.624 % | |
120 | Latvia | 57.199 % | |
121 | Cabo Verde | 56.918 % | |
122 | Spain | 56.881 % | |
123 | Fiji | 56.727 % | |
124 | French Polynesia | 56.726 % | |
125 | Dominican Republic | 56.623 % | |
126 | Guyana | 56.511 % | |
127 | Albania | 56.428 % | |
128 | Oman | 56.362 % | |
129 | Lithuania | 56.157 % | |
130 | South Africa | 56.129 % | |
131 | Ukraine | 56.044 % | |
132 | France | 55.989 % | |
133 | Chile | 55.735 % | |
134 | Uzbekistan | 55.595 % | |
135 | Namibia | 55.555 % | |
136 | Samoa | 55.424 % | |
137 | Luxembourg | 55.132 % | |
138 | Republic of Moldova | 54.815 % | |
139 | Poland | 54.796 % | |
140 | Sri Lanka | 54.435 % | |
141 | Cuba | 53.927 % | |
142 | Serbia | 53.7 % | |
143 | Maldives | 53.302 % | |
144 | Belgium | 53.294 % | |
145 | North Macedonia | 53.274 % | |
146 | Croatia | 52.658 % | |
147 | Eswatini | 52.496 % | |
148 | Hungary | 52.322 % | |
149 | Greece | 52.161 % | |
150 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.685 % | |
151 | Turkmenistan | 51.174 % | |
152 | Tajikistan | 50.834 % | |
153 | Morocco | 50.64 % | |
154 | Romania | 50.529 % | |
155 | Pakistan | 50.381 % | |
156 | Bulgaria | 50.129 % | |
157 | Senegal | 50.034 % | |
158 | Suriname | 49.972 % | |
159 | Sudan | 49.404 % | |
160 | Italy | 48.916 % | |
161 | Malta | 48.718 % | |
162 | Papua New Guinea | 48.621 % | |
163 | Montenegro | 48.327 % | |
164 | Gambia | 48.263 % | |
165 | Gabon | 48.141 % | |
166 | Saudi Arabia | 48.06 % | |
167 | Puerto Rico | 47.7 % | |
168 | Libya | 46.648 % | |
169 | Syrian Arab Republic | 46.569 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 46.532 % | |
171 | Turkey | 46.431 % | |
172 | Iran | 46.119 % | |
173 | Tunisia | 46.082 % | |
174 | Egypt | 46.02 % | |
175 | Mauritania | 44.977 % | |
176 | Lebanon | 43.813 % | |
177 | Algeria | 43.348 % | |
178 | Yemen | 41.865 % | |
179 | Iraq | 41.823 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.683 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.244 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 38.642 % | |
183 | Jordan | 38.3 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.303 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 33.715 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.023 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Mozambique
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Qatar
- #6
Nigeria
- #7
North Korea
- #8
Ethiopia
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
Burkina Faso
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Yemen
- #177
Algeria
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2005, Tanzania led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 87.99%, while the global range for this metric spanned from 24.02% to 87.99%. The global average Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2005 was 61.13%, providing a benchmark for evaluating individual country performances.
Economic and Societal Factors Influencing Youth Participation
The Youth Labor Force Participation Rate is significantly shaped by economic and societal conditions. In countries like Tanzania (87.99%) and Madagascar (86.50%), high participation rates can be attributed to the necessity for youth to contribute to household incomes, often due to limited access to education and high levels of poverty. In contrast, nations with lower participation rates, such as Sao Tome and Principe (24.02%) and Djibouti (33.71%), may reflect higher school enrollment rates or economic structures that do not require youth labor as extensively.
Furthermore, cultural expectations and labor market demands play crucial roles. For instance, in Qatar (82.56%), economic prosperity and labor market dynamics, driven by a high demand for labor in various sectors, contribute to elevated youth participation. In contrast, countries like Jordan (38.30%) may experience lower participation due to higher educational aspirations and societal norms that prioritize academic achievement over early workforce entry.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors also significantly impact youth labor force participation. In regions with predominantly rural populations, such as Mozambique (85.02%) and Ethiopia (82.02%), agriculture remains a primary employment sector, necessitating youth involvement in farming activities. The urban-rural divide often dictates the availability and type of employment opportunities for young people.
Demographic pressures, including high youth population growth, can lead to increased participation rates as more young individuals enter the labor market out of necessity. In countries like Nigeria (82.17%), where there is a burgeoning youth demographic, the labor force must absorb a rapidly growing number of young job seekers, contributing to a high participation rate.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
From year to year, some countries experienced significant shifts in their Youth Labor Force Participation Rates. Costa Rica saw the largest increase, with a rise of 2.44 percentage points (4.1%), which may be linked to economic reforms or improved labor market conditions encouraging youth employment. Similarly, Belgium and Ireland recorded increases of 1.35 (2.6%) and 1.30 percentage points (2.0%), respectively, possibly reflecting policy changes or economic growth that opened more opportunities for young workers.
Conversely, Tajikistan experienced the most significant decrease, with a drop of 2.09 percentage points (-4.0%). This decline could be attributed to factors such as economic downturns, policy shifts discouraging youth employment, or increased educational enrollment. Similarly, Fiji and Turkmenistan saw declines of 1.47 (-2.5%) and 1.46 percentage points (-2.8%), respectively, indicating potential socio-economic challenges or changes in youth engagement priorities.
Policy Implications and Future Outlook
The data from 2005 underscores the complex interplay between economic conditions, societal norms, and policy frameworks in shaping Youth Labor Force Participation Rates. Countries with high participation rates often face challenges related to underemployment and lack of formal job opportunities, necessitating policies that focus on education and skills training to better integrate youth into the workforce.
For countries with lower participation rates, such as Algeria (43.35%), there is a need to balance educational attainment with workforce readiness, ensuring that young people are prepared for future job markets. Policymakers must consider demographic trends and labor market demands to create sustainable employment pathways for the youth population.
Overall, understanding the factors driving youth labor force participation can help guide strategic planning and policy development, fostering environments where young people can thrive economically and socially.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2005
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2005?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2005, with 87.99%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2005?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2005, with 24.02%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2005?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2005 was 61.13%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2005?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2005 was 61.14%.
How many countries are included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rates in 2005?
The dataset includes 186 countries for youth labor force participation rates in 2005.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rates in 2005?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rates in 2005 were Tanzania, Madagascar, and Mozambique.
Insights by country
Poland
In 2005, Poland had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 54.796 %, ranking #139 out of 186 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to more prosperous neighboring countries like Germany. Contributing factors include economic transitions post-communism, which affected job availability, and a relatively high rate of youth pursuing higher education, delaying their entry into the labor market.
French Polynesia
In 2005, French Polynesia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 56.726 %, ranking #124 out of 186 countries. This figure is relatively low compared to neighboring Pacific nations, where youth participation rates often exceed 70%. Contributing factors include the region's unique economic structure, which relies heavily on tourism and agriculture, limiting diverse job opportunities for young people.
Belize
In 2005, Belize ranked #98 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.74%. This rate is relatively high compared to some Caribbean neighbors, reflecting the region's challenges in youth employment. The participation rate in Belize can be attributed to a young demographic and a growing economy that encourages youth to enter the workforce, despite limited job opportunities in certain sectors.
Bahrain
Bahrain's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2005 was 65.695 %, ranking it #59 out of 186 countries. This rate is notable when compared to regional averages, indicating a relatively high engagement of young individuals in the labor market. Key drivers of this participation include Bahrain's diverse economy, which has shifted towards finance and tourism, and its strategic location in the Gulf, attracting both local and foreign investment.
China, Macao SAR
In 2005, China, Macao SAR had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 63.911%, ranking #74 out of 186 countries. This rate is higher than many neighboring regions, reflecting a robust engagement of youth in the labor market compared to global averages. Contributing factors include Macao's booming tourism and gaming industries, which create numerous job opportunities for young people, alongside favorable policies aimed at enhancing employment among the youth.
Suriname
In 2005, Suriname ranked #158 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 49.972 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating significant challenges in youth employment opportunities. Economic factors, such as reliance on a small number of export commodities and limited job creation, contribute to this low participation rate, while demographic trends show a young population facing barriers to entering the labor market.
Namibia
In 2005, Namibia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 55.555%, ranking #135 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include high unemployment rates and a significant portion of the population living in rural areas, which limits access to job markets and vocational training.
Jordan
In 2005, Jordan had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 38.3%, ranking #183 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably low compared to regional averages, reflecting challenges in integrating youth into the labor market. Contributing factors include high unemployment rates, limited job opportunities, and economic constraints stemming from regional instability and a reliance on external aid.
Dominican Republic
In 2005, the Dominican Republic had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 56.623 %, ranking #125 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to more developed nations. Key drivers include a high level of informal employment and economic reliance on sectors like tourism and agriculture, which often do not provide stable jobs for young people.
Argentina
In 2005, Argentina had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.511 %, ranking #90 out of 186 countries. This rate is below the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to higher-ranked nations. Economic instability and high inflation during this period limited job creation for young people, while educational disparities further hindered their transition into the labor market.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data