Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1990
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Burundi | 90.094 % | |
2 | Tanzania | 86.68 % | |
3 | Madagascar | 86.239 % | |
4 | Mozambique | 84.079 % | |
5 | Burkina Faso | 83.898 % | |
6 | Qatar | 83.745 % | |
7 | Solomon Islands | 83.473 % | |
8 | Cameroon | 82.229 % | |
9 | Ethiopia | 81.806 % | |
10 | Nigeria | 81.789 % | |
11 | North Korea | 81.489 % | |
12 | Eritrea | 81.003 % | |
13 | Malawi | 80.652 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 79.974 % | |
15 | China | 79.17 % | |
16 | Niger | 78.895 % | |
17 | Vietnam | 78.151 % | |
18 | Liberia | 77.318 % | |
19 | Angola | 77.269 % | |
20 | Vanuatu | 76.989 % | |
21 | Georgia | 75.732 % | |
22 | Thailand | 75.208 % | |
23 | South Sudan | 74.355 % | |
24 | United Arab Emirates | 74.354 % | |
25 | Lesotho | 73.671 % | |
26 | Uganda | 73.29 % | |
27 | Ghana | 73.074 % | |
28 | Kenya | 72.995 % | |
29 | Guam | 72.69 % | |
30 | Iceland | 72.681 % | |
31 | Central African Republic | 72.417 % | |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.191 % | |
33 | Chad | 72.177 % | |
34 | Benin | 72.156 % | |
35 | Timor-Leste | 71.901 % | |
36 | Bahamas | 71.753 % | |
37 | Jamaica | 71.238 % | |
38 | Bhutan | 70.568 % | |
39 | Mali | 70.338 % | |
40 | Kazakhstan | 69.948 % | |
41 | Azerbaijan | 69.533 % | |
42 | Paraguay | 69.119 % | |
43 | Bolivia | 69.002 % | |
44 | Congo | 68.681 % | |
45 | Barbados | 68.508 % | |
46 | Myanmar | 68.232 % | |
47 | Estonia | 67.979 % | |
48 | Russia | 67.407 % | |
49 | Denmark | 67.301 % | |
50 | Sweden | 67.031 % | |
51 | Zimbabwe | 66.989 % | |
52 | Lithuania | 66.837 % | |
53 | Canada | 66.76 % | |
54 | Haiti | 66.75 % | |
55 | Colombia | 66.743 % | |
56 | Bahrain | 66.716 % | |
57 | Brunei Darussalam | 66.421 % | |
58 | Indonesia | 66.365 % | |
59 | Netherlands | 66.34 % | |
60 | Guatemala | 66.319 % | |
61 | Armenia | 65.93 % | |
62 | Honduras | 65.916 % | |
63 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.604 % | |
64 | United States Virgin Islands | 65.56 % | |
65 | Slovakia | 65.51 % | |
66 | United States | 65.292 % | |
67 | Kuwait | 64.946 % | |
68 | Finland | 64.744 % | |
69 | Brazil | 64.676 % | |
70 | Switzerland | 64.659 % | |
71 | New Caledonia | 64.654 % | |
72 | Sierra Leone | 64.348 % | |
73 | Guinea-Bissau | 64.085 % | |
74 | Venezuela | 64.054 % | |
75 | Australia | 63.894 % | |
76 | Guinea | 63.743 % | |
77 | Albania | 63.69 % | |
78 | New Zealand | 63.49 % | |
79 | Japan | 63.392 % | |
80 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 63.217 % | |
81 | Saint Lucia | 63.048 % | |
82 | Ecuador | 63.018 % | |
83 | Rwanda | 62.829 % | |
84 | Botswana | 62.606 % | |
85 | Laos | 62.465 % | |
86 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 62.438 % | |
87 | United Kingdom | 62.376 % | |
88 | Czech Republic | 61.585 % | |
89 | El Salvador | 61.559 % | |
90 | Norway | 61.551 % | |
91 | Sri Lanka | 61.45 % | |
92 | Philippines | 61.362 % | |
93 | Poland | 61.138 % | |
94 | Singapore | 61.03 % | |
95 | Cabo Verde | 60.89 % | |
96 | Latvia | 60.667 % | |
97 | Ireland | 60.49 % | |
98 | Cyprus | 60.317 % | |
99 | Mauritius | 60.191 % | |
100 | Equatorial Guinea | 60.148 % | |
101 | Fiji | 59.766 % | |
102 | Portugal | 59.718 % | |
103 | Zambia | 59.654 % | |
104 | Ukraine | 59.51 % | |
105 | Guyana | 59.454 % | |
106 | South Korea | 59.379 % | |
107 | Belarus | 59.276 % | |
108 | Kyrgyzstan | 59.202 % | |
109 | Togo | 59.181 % | |
110 | Peru | 59.115 % | |
111 | Argentina | 59.093 % | |
112 | French Polynesia | 59.084 % | |
113 | Trinidad and Tobago | 59.031 % | |
114 | Serbia | 58.92 % | |
115 | Israel | 58.823 % | |
116 | Slovenia | 58.527 % | |
117 | Republic of Moldova | 58.443 % | |
118 | Germany | 58.171 % | |
119 | Mexico | 58.123 % | |
120 | South Africa | 58.095 % | |
121 | Nicaragua | 57.984 % | |
122 | India | 57.937 % | |
123 | China, Macao SAR | 57.846 % | |
124 | Croatia | 57.734 % | |
125 | Costa Rica | 57.35 % | |
126 | Uruguay | 57.199 % | |
127 | Mongolia | 57.197 % | |
128 | Dominican Republic | 56.993 % | |
129 | Bangladesh | 56.777 % | |
130 | Turkey | 56.614 % | |
131 | Malaysia | 56.284 % | |
132 | Oman | 56.239 % | |
133 | Samoa | 56.199 % | |
134 | Uzbekistan | 56.158 % | |
135 | North Macedonia | 56.03 % | |
136 | Tonga | 55.678 % | |
137 | Austria | 55.663 % | |
138 | France | 55.603 % | |
139 | Belize | 55.366 % | |
140 | Namibia | 55.116 % | |
141 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
142 | Panama | 54.468 % | |
143 | Eswatini | 54.407 % | |
144 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 54.396 % | |
145 | Chile | 52.514 % | |
146 | Cuba | 52.228 % | |
147 | Hungary | 51.541 % | |
148 | Saudi Arabia | 51.35 % | |
149 | Morocco | 51.239 % | |
150 | Senegal | 51.146 % | |
151 | Syrian Arab Republic | 51.004 % | |
152 | Montenegro | 50.974 % | |
153 | Luxembourg | 50.757 % | |
154 | Greece | 50.544 % | |
155 | Bulgaria | 50.259 % | |
156 | Italy | 50.073 % | |
157 | Sudan | 50.069 % | |
158 | Romania | 50.061 % | |
159 | Malta | 49.873 % | |
160 | Spain | 49.859 % | |
161 | Maldives | 49.52 % | |
162 | Pakistan | 49.35 % | |
163 | Tunisia | 49.084 % | |
164 | Papua New Guinea | 48.603 % | |
165 | Gabon | 48.521 % | |
166 | Belgium | 48.258 % | |
167 | Gambia | 48.233 % | |
168 | Suriname | 48.151 % | |
169 | Turkmenistan | 47.67 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 47.186 % | |
171 | Iran | 47.142 % | |
172 | Egypt | 46.68 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 46.48 % | |
174 | Algeria | 45.624 % | |
175 | Libya | 45.546 % | |
176 | Lebanon | 44.845 % | |
177 | Puerto Rico | 44.59 % | |
178 | Yemen | 44.229 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.462 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.706 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.553 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.352 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.339 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 35.114 % | |
185 | Somalia | 33.997 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.676 % |
- #1
Burundi
- #2
Tanzania
- #3
Madagascar
- #4
Mozambique
- #5
Burkina Faso
- #6
Qatar
- #7
Solomon Islands
- #8
Cameroon
- #9
Ethiopia
- #10
Nigeria
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Yemen
- #177
Puerto Rico
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1990, the country with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was Burundi, with an impressive 90.09%. The global range for youth labor force participation that year spanned from a low of 24.68% to this peak. The average participation rate worldwide was 61.57%, offering a broad overview of youth engagement in the labor market across different regions and economies.
Economic Structures and High Participation Rates
Countries with the highest youth labor force participation rates often reflect specific economic structures where youth employment is crucial. For instance, in Burundi (90.09%), Tanzania (86.68%), and Madagascar (86.24%), agriculture plays a significant role in the economy. In these nations, young people frequently contribute to family farming operations, which are labor-intensive and rely on manual labor. This economic reliance on agriculture necessitates high participation from all family members, including the youth.
Moreover, in countries like Mozambique (84.08%) and Burkina Faso (83.90%), limited access to formal education and vocational training channels youths towards early entry into the labor market. The necessity for additional household income in low-income economies also contributes to higher participation rates among the youth.
Low Participation Rates and Socioeconomic Factors
Conversely, countries with the lowest youth labor force participation rates often experience different socioeconomic conditions. Sao Tome and Principe recorded the lowest rate at 24.68%, followed by Somalia (34.00%) and Djibouti (35.11%). Factors such as political instability, conflict, and limited economic opportunities can lead to reduced youth labor market engagement.
Furthermore, in regions like the State of Palestine (40.35%) and Jordan (39.34%), cultural norms and policies that emphasize education over early employment contribute to lower participation rates. These countries often have policies that encourage extended schooling, which delays entry into the workforce.
Impact of Policy and Education on Participation Rates
Government policies and educational systems significantly shape youth labor force participation. In countries such as Qatar (83.75%) and the Solomon Islands (83.47%), where high participation rates are observed, government initiatives might support youth employment through vocational training and job placement programs.
In contrast, nations like Puerto Rico (44.59%) and Iraq (42.46%) demonstrate how educational policies prioritizing higher education can result in lower youth labor force participation. These policies encourage youth to remain in education longer, thereby reducing immediate labor market participation but potentially increasing future employability and income prospects.
Regional Disparities and Economic Implications
The data from 1990 reveals significant regional disparities in youth labor force participation rates. African nations like Cameroon (82.23%) and Nigeria (81.79%) tend to have higher rates due to economic structures heavily reliant on agriculture and informal sectors. These sectors often do not require formal education, thus facilitating early entry into the workforce.
In contrast, Middle Eastern countries such as Yemen (44.23%) and Jordan demonstrate lower participation rates, reflecting different economic priorities and the influence of cultural and educational policies. These disparities highlight the diverse economic landscapes and cultural contexts that influence youth labor market engagement globally.
Overall, understanding the determinants of youth labor force participation is crucial for policymakers aiming to address youth unemployment and improve economic outcomes. Tailored strategies that consider local economic conditions, educational systems, and cultural factors are essential for optimizing youth engagement in the labor market.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1990
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1990?
Burundi had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1990, with 90.09%.
What was the lowest youth labor force participation rate recorded in 1990 and in which country?
The lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1990 was in Sao Tome and Principe, at 24.68%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1990?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all 186 countries in 1990 was 61.57%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation in 1990?
The top 3 countries in 1990 for youth labor force participation were Burundi (90.09%), Tanzania (86.68%), and Madagascar (86.24%).
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 1990?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 1990 was 61.08%.
How many countries were included in the dataset for youth labor force participation in 1990?
The dataset included 186 countries for youth labor force participation in 1990.
Insights by country
Argentina
In 1990, Argentina had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.093 %, ranking #111 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment during that period. Economic instability and high inflation rates in the late 1980s significantly impacted job availability for young people, while educational policies struggled to align with labor market needs.
Estonia
In 1990, Estonia achieved a rank of #47 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.979%. This rate was notably higher than many of its regional peers emerging from the Soviet era, reflecting a transition towards a market economy. The high participation rate can be attributed to Estonia's emphasis on education and skills development, which prepared its youth for the labor market during a time of significant economic reform.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
In 1990, Congo, Democratic Republic of the achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 72.191 %, ranking #32 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many nations. The high participation can be attributed to a youthful population and economic necessity, as many families rely on the income generated by young workers in a country facing significant economic challenges.
Colombia
In 1990, Colombia ranked #55 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 66.743%. This figure was notably higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many other countries. Contributing factors include Colombia's demographic profile, with a significant proportion of young people entering the workforce, and economic conditions that necessitated youth participation in various sectors. Additionally, the country's historical context of conflict and economic challenges has often compelled young individuals to seek employment early.
Djibouti
In 1990, Djibouti had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 35.114 %, ranking #184 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably low, especially when compared to regional averages in East Africa, where youth participation typically exceeds 50%. Contributing factors include Djibouti's limited economic opportunities and high unemployment rates, which hinder youth engagement in the labor market.
Fiji
In 1990, Fiji had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.766 %, ranking #101 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors included Fiji's economic reliance on agriculture and tourism, which often limit job creation for young people, alongside demographic shifts and educational constraints that affect workforce readiness.
Cambodia
In 1990, Cambodia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 79.974 %, ranking #14 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic structure and economic reliance on agriculture. The high participation rate can be attributed to a combination of factors, including limited access to education and the necessity for families to have all members contribute to household income in a recovering post-conflict economy.
Cameroon
In 1990, Cameroon achieved a global rank of #8 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 82.229%. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic profile. The high participation is driven by the need for economic contributions in a developing economy, where many young individuals engage in informal labor to support their families and communities.
Lesotho
In 1990, Lesotho achieved a global rank of #25 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 73.671%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a strong engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many other countries. Contributing factors include Lesotho's youthful population and the necessity for income generation in a country where economic opportunities are limited due to its mountainous geography and reliance on agriculture.
Costa Rica
In 1990, Costa Rica had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 57.35%, ranking #125 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors included a transitional economy focused on service and technology sectors, alongside educational policies that emphasized access to schooling over immediate labor market integration.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data