Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2016
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qatar | 87.475 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 85.83 % | |
3 | Solomon Islands | 84.34 % | |
4 | Tanzania | 83.894 % | |
5 | North Korea | 82.02 % | |
6 | Cambodia | 81.735 % | |
7 | Nigeria | 80.843 % | |
8 | Burundi | 79.924 % | |
9 | Eritrea | 79.08 % | |
10 | Mozambique | 79.019 % | |
11 | United Arab Emirates | 78.446 % | |
12 | Burkina Faso | 78.371 % | |
13 | Iceland | 77.416 % | |
14 | Vietnam | 76.965 % | |
15 | Liberia | 76.937 % | |
16 | Ethiopia | 76.368 % | |
17 | Angola | 75.899 % | |
18 | Peru | 75.377 % | |
19 | Kenya | 74.405 % | |
20 | Bahamas | 74.032 % | |
21 | South Sudan | 73.978 % | |
22 | Benin | 73.919 % | |
23 | Uganda | 73.777 % | |
24 | Central African Republic | 73.419 % | |
25 | Niger | 73.118 % | |
26 | Kuwait | 72.704 % | |
27 | Bahrain | 71.977 % | |
28 | Kazakhstan | 70.33 % | |
29 | Oman | 70.289 % | |
30 | Cameroon | 70.225 % | |
31 | China, Macao SAR | 70.062 % | |
32 | Paraguay | 69.966 % | |
33 | Republic of Moldova | 69.907 % | |
34 | Mali | 69.865 % | |
35 | New Zealand | 69.546 % | |
36 | Saint Lucia | 69.339 % | |
37 | Singapore | 69.244 % | |
38 | China | 68.88 % | |
39 | Switzerland | 68.663 % | |
40 | Thailand | 68.315 % | |
41 | Congo | 68.147 % | |
42 | Ghana | 68.066 % | |
43 | Ecuador | 67.669 % | |
44 | Bolivia | 67.359 % | |
45 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 67.028 % | |
46 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 66.829 % | |
47 | Timor-Leste | 66.823 % | |
48 | Colombia | 66.418 % | |
49 | Indonesia | 66.314 % | |
50 | Netherlands | 66.281 % | |
51 | Norway | 66.201 % | |
52 | Panama | 66.186 % | |
53 | Zimbabwe | 66.07 % | |
54 | Barbados | 66.064 % | |
55 | Georgia | 66.021 % | |
56 | Haiti | 65.882 % | |
57 | Canada | 65.638 % | |
58 | Israel | 65.635 % | |
59 | Brunei Darussalam | 65.421 % | |
60 | Malawi | 65.232 % | |
61 | Nicaragua | 65.213 % | |
62 | Malaysia | 65.09 % | |
63 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 65.025 % | |
64 | Australia | 64.952 % | |
65 | Jamaica | 64.922 % | |
66 | Azerbaijan | 64.652 % | |
67 | Uruguay | 64.612 % | |
68 | Belarus | 64.383 % | |
69 | Brazil | 64.29 % | |
70 | Belize | 64.249 % | |
71 | Sweden | 64.078 % | |
72 | Cyprus | 63.762 % | |
73 | Myanmar | 63.378 % | |
74 | Honduras | 63.322 % | |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.085 % | |
76 | Bhutan | 62.961 % | |
77 | Russia | 62.872 % | |
78 | Estonia | 62.639 % | |
79 | South Korea | 62.626 % | |
80 | Botswana | 62.461 % | |
81 | Dominican Republic | 62.451 % | |
82 | United States | 62.431 % | |
83 | United Kingdom | 62.408 % | |
84 | Guam | 62.391 % | |
85 | Chile | 62.324 % | |
86 | Ireland | 62.119 % | |
87 | Trinidad and Tobago | 62.041 % | |
88 | Denmark | 61.744 % | |
89 | Armenia | 61.642 % | |
90 | Philippines | 61.59 % | |
91 | Lesotho | 61.517 % | |
92 | New Caledonia | 61.452 % | |
93 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.202 % | |
94 | Venezuela | 61.185 % | |
95 | Chad | 61.035 % | |
96 | Austria | 60.696 % | |
97 | Guatemala | 60.689 % | |
98 | Saudi Arabia | 60.685 % | |
99 | Vanuatu | 60.561 % | |
100 | Rwanda | 60.556 % | |
101 | Namibia | 60.453 % | |
102 | Mexico | 60.427 % | |
103 | Germany | 60.411 % | |
104 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.397 % | |
105 | Latvia | 60.347 % | |
106 | Lithuania | 60.305 % | |
107 | Slovakia | 60.008 % | |
108 | Japan | 59.986 % | |
109 | Laos | 59.898 % | |
110 | Czech Republic | 59.821 % | |
111 | Costa Rica | 59.687 % | |
112 | Mauritius | 59.658 % | |
113 | El Salvador | 59.261 % | |
114 | Kyrgyzstan | 59.215 % | |
115 | Cabo Verde | 59.171 % | |
116 | Luxembourg | 59.107 % | |
117 | Argentina | 59.02 % | |
118 | Zambia | 58.674 % | |
119 | Finland | 58.545 % | |
120 | Portugal | 58.414 % | |
121 | Mongolia | 58.397 % | |
122 | Spain | 58.325 % | |
123 | United States Virgin Islands | 58.324 % | |
124 | Togo | 58.109 % | |
125 | Fiji | 57.584 % | |
126 | Albania | 57.314 % | |
127 | Poland | 57.307 % | |
128 | Hungary | 57.297 % | |
129 | Maldives | 56.893 % | |
130 | Slovenia | 56.843 % | |
131 | Malta | 56.576 % | |
132 | Uzbekistan | 56.447 % | |
133 | Ukraine | 56.299 % | |
134 | Suriname | 56.115 % | |
135 | Bangladesh | 56.09 % | |
136 | French Polynesia | 55.876 % | |
137 | Guyana | 55.672 % | |
138 | Cuba | 55.581 % | |
139 | Sierra Leone | 55.435 % | |
140 | France | 55.399 % | |
141 | Guinea | 54.975 % | |
142 | South Africa | 54.714 % | |
143 | Tonga | 54.687 % | |
144 | Samoa | 54.498 % | |
145 | Sri Lanka | 53.725 % | |
146 | North Macedonia | 53.44 % | |
147 | Bulgaria | 53.31 % | |
148 | Belgium | 53.164 % | |
149 | Serbia | 52.972 % | |
150 | India | 52.852 % | |
151 | Montenegro | 52.748 % | |
152 | Turkey | 52 % | |
153 | Pakistan | 51.682 % | |
154 | Croatia | 51.158 % | |
155 | Greece | 51.147 % | |
156 | Eswatini | 51.135 % | |
157 | Romania | 50.936 % | |
158 | Gabon | 50.762 % | |
159 | Senegal | 50.116 % | |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 50.088 % | |
161 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 49.624 % | |
162 | Libya | 49.373 % | |
163 | Italy | 49.164 % | |
164 | Gambia | 47.793 % | |
165 | Tunisia | 47.719 % | |
166 | Comoros | 47.689 % | |
167 | Lebanon | 47.513 % | |
168 | Afghanistan | 47.235 % | |
169 | Egypt | 46.63 % | |
170 | Morocco | 46.55 % | |
171 | State of Palestine | 43.769 % | |
172 | Sudan | 43.514 % | |
173 | Turkmenistan | 43.325 % | |
174 | Iran | 43.165 % | |
175 | Iraq | 43.15 % | |
176 | Algeria | 42.333 % | |
177 | Mauritania | 41.589 % | |
178 | Nepal | 40.096 % | |
179 | Tajikistan | 39.706 % | |
180 | Jordan | 38.935 % | |
181 | Puerto Rico | 38.155 % | |
182 | Syrian Arab Republic | 37.716 % | |
183 | Somalia | 34.135 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 32.431 % | |
185 | Yemen | 32.282 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 23.951 % |
- #1
Qatar
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Solomon Islands
- #4
Tanzania
- #5
North Korea
- #6
Cambodia
- #7
Nigeria
- #8
Burundi
- #9
Eritrea
- #10
Mozambique
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Yemen
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Somalia
- #182
Syrian Arab Republic
- #181
Puerto Rico
- #180
Jordan
- #179
Tajikistan
- #178
Nepal
- #177
Mauritania
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2016, Qatar led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 87.47%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 23.95% to a maximum of 87.47%. The average Youth Labor Force Participation Rate worldwide was 60.86%, providing a baseline for comparison among the 186 countries with available data.
Economic Factors Influencing Participation Rates
The substantial variation in Youth Labor Force Participation Rates across countries can often be attributed to economic conditions. For instance, Qatar, with its robust economy driven by oil and gas revenues, shows a high participation rate, possibly due to the availability of jobs in these sectors. Conversely, Sao Tome and Principe, with a rate of 23.95%, reflects limited economic opportunities, which often discourage youth from entering the labor market. In countries like Nigeria, where the economy is diverse yet still developing, a relatively high participation rate of 80.84% suggests that many young people must work to support their families.
Geopolitical and Social Impacts
Geopolitical stability and social structures play significant roles in shaping youth labor force engagement. Somalia and Yemen, with participation rates of 34.13% and 32.28% respectively, have been affected by prolonged conflicts, leading to disruptions in economic activities and educational systems. In contrast, North Korea (82.02%) shows high participation, likely due to state policies emphasizing labor force involvement.
Impact of Urbanization and Education
Urbanization and education levels have direct impacts on youth labor force participation. Madagascar (85.83%) and Solomon Islands (84.34%) demonstrate high participation rates, perhaps due to limited access to higher education, which often keeps youth in the labor market. Meanwhile, Jordan (38.94%) and Puerto Rico (38.15%) have lower participation rates, which could be attributed to higher education enrollment rates that delay workforce entry.
Year-over-Year Changes in Participation Rates
The year-over-year changes in youth labor force participation rates reveal dynamic shifts influenced by various factors. Senegal experienced the most significant increase, with a 10.2% rise, potentially due to economic reforms and job creation initiatives. Cambodia also saw a notable increase of 2.13%, reflecting policy changes aimed at integrating youth into the workforce. On the other hand, Costa Rica experienced a significant decrease of -5.0%, which may result from increased educational opportunities or economic shifts that reduce the immediate need for youth employment.
These insights into the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2016 highlight the complex interplay of economic conditions, social structures, and policy environments in shaping young people's engagement in the labor market. Understanding these factors can help policymakers design targeted interventions to improve youth employment outcomes worldwide.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2016
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2016?
Qatar had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2016, with 87.47%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2016?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2016, with 23.95%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2016?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2016 was 60.86%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2016?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2016 was 61.19%.
Which countries were in the top 10 for youth labor force participation rate in 2016?
The top 10 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2016 were Qatar, Madagascar, Solomon Islands, Tanzania, North Korea, Cambodia, Nigeria, Burundi, Eritrea, and Mozambique.
Which countries were in the bottom 10 for youth labor force participation rate in 2016?
The bottom 10 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2016 were Sao Tome and Principe, Yemen, Djibouti, Somalia, Syrian Arab Republic, Puerto Rico, Jordan, Tajikistan, Nepal, and Mauritania.
Insights by country
Uzbekistan
In 2016, Uzbekistan ranked #132 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 56.447%. This rate is below the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to higher-ranking countries. Contributing factors include a transitioning economy and a youthful population that faces limited job creation in various sectors, particularly in rural areas where economic diversification is still developing.
Latvia
In 2016, Latvia ranked #105 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.347%. This figure is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges faced by young people in entering the labor market. Contributing factors include a relatively high youth unemployment rate and a transition from a post-Soviet economy, which has affected job availability and skills matching.
Mexico
In 2016, Mexico ranked #102 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.427%. This rate is lower than the regional average for Latin America, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to neighboring countries. Contributing factors include a high level of informal employment and limited access to quality education and vocational training, which hinder young people's transition into the formal labor market.
Burkina Faso
In 2016, Burkina Faso achieved a global rank of #12 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 78.371%. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting the country's demographic dynamics where a large proportion of the population is young and actively seeking employment. Contributing factors include a youthful population structure and economic reliance on agriculture, which often employs young workers in informal sectors.
Mozambique
Mozambique achieved a remarkable 10 global rank in 2016 for its Youth Labor Force Participation Rate, standing at 79.019%. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, highlighting the country's youthful demographic and labor market dynamics. Contributing factors include a large population of young individuals seeking employment opportunities in agriculture and informal sectors, alongside government policies aimed at promoting youth employment and entrepreneurship.
Slovakia
In 2016, Slovakia ranked #107 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.008%. This rate is lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to neighboring countries like Poland. Key factors influencing this statistic include Slovakia's economic transition post-communism, which has led to a mismatch between education systems and labor market needs, as well as relatively high youth unemployment rates in certain regions.
Mongolia
Mongolia's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2016 was 58.397%, ranking #121 out of 186 countries. This rate is below the global average, reflecting challenges in economic opportunities for youth compared to higher-ranking nations. Contributing factors include Mongolia's reliance on mining and agriculture, which often limits job availability for younger demographics, alongside a significant rural population facing barriers to employment.
Togo
Togo's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2016 was 58.109 %, ranking #124 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include Togo's economic reliance on agriculture, which often limits formal job availability, and a demographic profile where a significant portion of the population is under 25, intensifying competition for limited jobs.
Serbia
In 2016, Serbia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 52.972%, ranking #149 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Factors contributing to this statistic include a sluggish economic recovery post-conflict and a high level of youth unemployment, which has been exacerbated by a lack of investment in job creation and skills training programs.
New Zealand
In 2016, New Zealand ranked #35 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 69.546%. This rate is above the global average, reflecting a robust engagement of young people in the workforce compared to many countries. Contributing factors include a relatively strong economy and government policies that promote youth employment through vocational training and education initiatives.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data