Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2018
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qatar | 87.503 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 85.496 % | |
3 | Solomon Islands | 84.304 % | |
4 | Tanzania | 83.834 % | |
5 | North Korea | 82.179 % | |
6 | Cambodia | 81.911 % | |
7 | Nigeria | 80.955 % | |
8 | Burundi | 80.045 % | |
9 | United Arab Emirates | 79.108 % | |
10 | Mozambique | 78.949 % | |
11 | Eritrea | 78.688 % | |
12 | Burkina Faso | 77.871 % | |
13 | Vietnam | 77.482 % | |
14 | Peru | 77.179 % | |
15 | Liberia | 76.873 % | |
16 | Iceland | 75.978 % | |
17 | Angola | 75.316 % | |
18 | Uganda | 74.794 % | |
19 | Benin | 74.707 % | |
20 | Bahamas | 74.297 % | |
21 | South Sudan | 74.238 % | |
22 | Kuwait | 73.568 % | |
23 | Central African Republic | 73.43 % | |
24 | Ethiopia | 73.16 % | |
25 | Niger | 72.666 % | |
26 | Bahrain | 72.07 % | |
27 | Paraguay | 71.868 % | |
28 | Bolivia | 71.798 % | |
29 | Oman | 70.517 % | |
30 | New Zealand | 70.506 % | |
31 | Kazakhstan | 70.13 % | |
32 | Kenya | 70.103 % | |
33 | China, Macao SAR | 70.082 % | |
34 | Saint Lucia | 69.88 % | |
35 | Singapore | 68.581 % | |
36 | Switzerland | 68.575 % | |
37 | Cameroon | 68.387 % | |
38 | Mali | 68.284 % | |
39 | Congo | 68.147 % | |
40 | China | 67.81 % | |
41 | Thailand | 67.798 % | |
42 | Indonesia | 67.652 % | |
43 | Panama | 67.571 % | |
44 | Belize | 67.295 % | |
45 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 67.294 % | |
46 | Timor-Leste | 67.204 % | |
47 | Republic of Moldova | 67.053 % | |
48 | Ecuador | 66.66 % | |
49 | Honduras | 66.492 % | |
50 | Brunei Darussalam | 66.433 % | |
51 | Netherlands | 66.382 % | |
52 | Haiti | 65.934 % | |
53 | Norway | 65.909 % | |
54 | Zimbabwe | 65.894 % | |
55 | Australia | 65.804 % | |
56 | Barbados | 65.714 % | |
57 | Malaysia | 65.574 % | |
58 | Canada | 65.547 % | |
59 | Jamaica | 65.484 % | |
60 | Israel | 65.432 % | |
61 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.406 % | |
62 | Azerbaijan | 65.399 % | |
63 | Cyprus | 65.38 % | |
64 | Ghana | 65.282 % | |
65 | Colombia | 65.237 % | |
66 | Nicaragua | 65.155 % | |
67 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 64.519 % | |
68 | Brazil | 64.501 % | |
69 | Sweden | 64.5 % | |
70 | Belarus | 64.412 % | |
71 | Georgia | 63.934 % | |
72 | Dominican Republic | 63.771 % | |
73 | Uruguay | 63.679 % | |
74 | Estonia | 63.498 % | |
75 | Malawi | 63.373 % | |
76 | Chile | 63.207 % | |
77 | Botswana | 63.107 % | |
78 | Guinea-Bissau | 62.901 % | |
79 | South Korea | 62.757 % | |
80 | United Kingdom | 62.619 % | |
81 | Bhutan | 62.603 % | |
82 | United States | 62.592 % | |
83 | Russia | 62.445 % | |
84 | Guam | 62.364 % | |
85 | Myanmar | 62.361 % | |
86 | Costa Rica | 62.21 % | |
87 | Ireland | 62.142 % | |
88 | Denmark | 61.906 % | |
89 | Lithuania | 61.544 % | |
90 | Japan | 61.446 % | |
91 | Maldives | 61.431 % | |
92 | Latvia | 61.339 % | |
93 | Armenia | 61.329 % | |
94 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.306 % | |
95 | Trinidad and Tobago | 61.148 % | |
96 | Laos | 60.989 % | |
97 | Austria | 60.919 % | |
98 | Germany | 60.859 % | |
99 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.647 % | |
100 | Guatemala | 60.503 % | |
101 | Mexico | 60.429 % | |
102 | Rwanda | 60.378 % | |
103 | Czech Republic | 60.373 % | |
104 | Chad | 59.974 % | |
105 | Mongolia | 59.746 % | |
106 | Slovakia | 59.727 % | |
107 | Argentina | 59.595 % | |
108 | Saudi Arabia | 59.418 % | |
109 | Finland | 59.309 % | |
110 | Albania | 59.296 % | |
111 | Luxembourg | 59.291 % | |
112 | Mauritius | 59.274 % | |
113 | Malta | 59.255 % | |
114 | Vanuatu | 59.254 % | |
115 | Philippines | 58.981 % | |
116 | Lesotho | 58.955 % | |
117 | Portugal | 58.953 % | |
118 | Slovenia | 58.945 % | |
119 | New Caledonia | 58.939 % | |
120 | Bangladesh | 58.915 % | |
121 | Namibia | 58.879 % | |
122 | El Salvador | 58.728 % | |
123 | Zambia | 58.475 % | |
124 | Kyrgyzstan | 58.46 % | |
125 | Hungary | 58.297 % | |
126 | Venezuela | 58.193 % | |
127 | Togo | 58.033 % | |
128 | Spain | 57.634 % | |
129 | Poland | 57.534 % | |
130 | Fiji | 57.361 % | |
131 | Uzbekistan | 56.552 % | |
132 | Ukraine | 56.312 % | |
133 | Suriname | 56.302 % | |
134 | Guyana | 55.791 % | |
135 | French Polynesia | 55.614 % | |
136 | Cabo Verde | 55.56 % | |
137 | Cuba | 55.461 % | |
138 | Bulgaria | 55.316 % | |
139 | France | 55.3 % | |
140 | South Africa | 55.161 % | |
141 | United States Virgin Islands | 55.066 % | |
142 | Tonga | 53.995 % | |
143 | Serbia | 53.962 % | |
144 | Sierra Leone | 53.912 % | |
145 | Belgium | 53.669 % | |
146 | Guinea | 53.579 % | |
147 | Montenegro | 53.566 % | |
148 | Turkey | 53.212 % | |
149 | North Macedonia | 52.796 % | |
150 | India | 52.482 % | |
151 | Samoa | 52.348 % | |
152 | Romania | 51.834 % | |
153 | Sri Lanka | 51.721 % | |
154 | Gabon | 51.28 % | |
155 | Pakistan | 50.994 % | |
156 | Croatia | 50.935 % | |
157 | Papua New Guinea | 50.833 % | |
158 | Greece | 50.8 % | |
159 | Comoros | 50.788 % | |
160 | Eswatini | 50.534 % | |
161 | Italy | 49.621 % | |
162 | Libya | 49.275 % | |
163 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 49.129 % | |
164 | Tunisia | 48.61 % | |
165 | Lebanon | 48.433 % | |
166 | Senegal | 48.353 % | |
167 | Gambia | 47.77 % | |
168 | Morocco | 45.83 % | |
169 | Afghanistan | 45.566 % | |
170 | Iran | 44.39 % | |
171 | State of Palestine | 43.452 % | |
172 | Egypt | 43.299 % | |
173 | Turkmenistan | 42.931 % | |
174 | Algeria | 42.281 % | |
175 | Sudan | 41.353 % | |
176 | Iraq | 41.244 % | |
177 | Mauritania | 41.079 % | |
178 | Nepal | 39.743 % | |
179 | Jordan | 39.176 % | |
180 | Puerto Rico | 38.582 % | |
181 | Tajikistan | 37.981 % | |
182 | Syrian Arab Republic | 37.782 % | |
183 | Somalia | 34.062 % | |
184 | Yemen | 32.612 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 32.111 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 23.794 % |
- #1
Qatar
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Solomon Islands
- #4
Tanzania
- #5
North Korea
- #6
Cambodia
- #7
Nigeria
- #8
Burundi
- #9
United Arab Emirates
- #10
Mozambique
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Yemen
- #183
Somalia
- #182
Syrian Arab Republic
- #181
Tajikistan
- #180
Puerto Rico
- #179
Jordan
- #178
Nepal
- #177
Mauritania
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2018, Qatar led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 87.50%, while the global range spanned from 23.79% to 87.50%. The global median participation rate was 61.33%, providing a benchmark for comparing individual country performances.
Economic Factors Influencing High Participation Rates
Countries with high youth labor force participation rates often share certain economic characteristics. For instance, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates feature prominently at the top due to their robust economies driven by oil wealth, which creates numerous job opportunities for young people. In Qatar, the participation rate stands at 87.503%, while the United Arab Emirates follows closely with 79.108%. This trend is also evident in Nigeria, where the youth participation rate is 80.955%. Here, the combination of a large population and a growing economy contributes to high engagement in the labor market. These countries benefit from policies that support youth employment and economic sectors that heavily rely on young labor.
Challenges in Countries with Low Participation
Conversely, countries with low youth participation rates often face significant economic and social challenges. Sao Tome and Principe recorded the lowest rate at 23.794%, followed by Djibouti at 32.111% and Yemen at 32.612%. These low rates can be attributed to economic instability, political unrest, and limited job opportunities. For example, in Yemen, ongoing conflict has severely disrupted the economy, limiting job availability and access to education, which are critical for youth employment. Similarly, in Djibouti, economic development is constrained, affecting job creation for the younger population.
Impact of Policy and Education
Government policies and educational systems also play crucial roles in shaping youth labor force participation. In countries like Madagascar and Cambodia, where participation rates are 85.496% and 81.911% respectively, policies encouraging vocational training and early entry into the workforce are prevalent. These policies ensure that youths are equipped with the necessary skills for employment, thereby increasing their participation rates. On the other hand, countries with lower participation rates may lack such policies or face challenges in implementing them effectively.
Year-over-Year Trends and Notable Changes
Analyzing year-over-year trends reveals significant shifts in certain countries' youth labor force participation rates. Belize experienced the largest increase at 5.1%, raising its rate by 3.26%. This increase is likely due to economic improvements and initiatives targeting youth employment. Similarly, Bolivia and Uganda saw increases of 4.6% and 4.2% respectively, indicating positive developments in their labor markets. In contrast, the United States Virgin Islands witnessed the most significant decrease of 6.9%, attributed to economic challenges and natural disasters impacting job availability. Other countries like Cabo Verde and Sri Lanka also showed declines, reflecting broader economic hardships or policy shifts affecting youth employment.
The Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2018 highlights a complex interplay of economic, policy, and social factors influencing young people's engagement in the labor market. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to improve youth employment outcomes globally.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2018
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2018?
Qatar had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2018, with 87.5%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2018?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2018, with 23.79%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2018?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all 186 countries in 2018 was 60.81%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2018?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2018 was 61.32%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2018?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2018 were Qatar (87.5%), Madagascar (85.5%), and Solomon Islands (84.3%).
What was the range of youth labor force participation rates in 2018?
In 2018, the youth labor force participation rates ranged from 23.79% in Sao Tome and Principe to 87.5% in Qatar.
Insights by country
Tonga
Tonga's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2018 was 53.995 %, ranking #142 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include Tonga's small economy, reliance on agriculture and remittances, and limited job creation for young people, which affects their ability to enter the labor market.
Equatorial Guinea
In 2018, Equatorial Guinea had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.306%, ranking #94 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's efforts to integrate its youth into the labor market amidst economic challenges. Factors such as a young population and the need for workforce development in key sectors like oil and agriculture drive this participation rate.
Israel
In 2018, Israel's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 65.432%, ranking #60 out of 186 countries. This rate is higher than many regional peers, reflecting the country's strong emphasis on education and vocational training. Key drivers include a robust technology sector that demands skilled labor and government policies aimed at integrating youth into the workforce, fostering economic growth and innovation.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 51.721 % in 2018, ranking #153 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include a high level of youth unemployment and a mismatch between educational outcomes and labor market needs, which hinder the transition of young people into the workforce.
China
In 2018, China achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.81 %, ranking #40 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's robust economic growth and demand for young workers. Key drivers include China's large population of youth entering the workforce and government policies that encourage employment and vocational training in various sectors.
Australia
In 2018, Australia ranked #55 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.804%. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to other developed nations. Contributing factors include a competitive job market and a focus on higher education, which may delay entry into the workforce for many young Australians.
French Polynesia
In 2018, French Polynesia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 55.614%, ranking #135 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include the region's limited economic diversification and reliance on tourism, which can be volatile and seasonal, affecting job availability for young people.
Iran
In 2018, Iran had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 44.39 %, ranking #170 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, reflecting significant challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include economic sanctions, high unemployment rates, and a lack of investment in sectors that typically employ young people, limiting their engagement in the labor market.
Finland
In 2018, Finland ranked #109 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.309%. This figure is below the European Union average, indicating a potential area for improvement in engaging young people in the workforce. Contributing factors include Finland's strong emphasis on education, which often leads youth to pursue higher studies rather than immediate employment, and a competitive job market that may not fully absorb young job seekers.
Albania
In 2018, Albania had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.296%, ranking #110 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Key drivers behind this statistic include Albania's ongoing economic transition and high levels of youth migration, which limit local job availability and impact labor market dynamics.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data