Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2007
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 87.864 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.548 % | |
3 | Qatar | 85.327 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.511 % | |
5 | Mozambique | 83.951 % | |
6 | North Korea | 82.099 % | |
7 | Ethiopia | 81.826 % | |
8 | Nigeria | 81.797 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 81.727 % | |
10 | Cambodia | 81.226 % | |
11 | Burkina Faso | 80.518 % | |
12 | Eritrea | 80.041 % | |
13 | Niger | 79.39 % | |
14 | Malawi | 78.524 % | |
15 | Peru | 78.228 % | |
16 | Burundi | 77.677 % | |
17 | United Arab Emirates | 77.32 % | |
18 | Angola | 77.254 % | |
19 | Iceland | 77.159 % | |
20 | Liberia | 77.121 % | |
21 | Vietnam | 75.032 % | |
22 | South Sudan | 74.106 % | |
23 | Bahamas | 74.07 % | |
24 | Vanuatu | 74.053 % | |
25 | Uganda | 73.803 % | |
26 | Kenya | 73.351 % | |
27 | Thailand | 72.873 % | |
28 | Central African Republic | 72.581 % | |
29 | Ghana | 72.038 % | |
30 | China | 71.954 % | |
31 | Benin | 71.822 % | |
32 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 70.789 % | |
33 | Kazakhstan | 70.39 % | |
34 | Mali | 70.294 % | |
35 | Barbados | 69.62 % | |
36 | Bhutan | 69.607 % | |
37 | Timor-Leste | 69.223 % | |
38 | Bolivia | 68.947 % | |
39 | Paraguay | 68.816 % | |
40 | Lesotho | 68.661 % | |
41 | China, Macao SAR | 68.597 % | |
42 | Norway | 68.42 % | |
43 | Georgia | 68.162 % | |
44 | New Zealand | 68.01 % | |
45 | Bahrain | 67.952 % | |
46 | Kuwait | 67.887 % | |
47 | Congo | 67.797 % | |
48 | Switzerland | 67.615 % | |
49 | Brazil | 67.295 % | |
50 | Brunei Darussalam | 67.251 % | |
51 | Netherlands | 67.168 % | |
52 | Canada | 67.109 % | |
53 | Ecuador | 66.767 % | |
54 | Ireland | 66.617 % | |
55 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 66.527 % | |
56 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.347 % | |
57 | Indonesia | 66.227 % | |
58 | Trinidad and Tobago | 65.999 % | |
59 | Myanmar | 65.916 % | |
60 | Saint Lucia | 65.916 % | |
61 | Denmark | 65.886 % | |
62 | Zimbabwe | 65.687 % | |
63 | Chad | 65.669 % | |
64 | Singapore | 65.497 % | |
65 | Australia | 65.275 % | |
66 | United States | 64.994 % | |
67 | Jamaica | 64.67 % | |
68 | New Caledonia | 64.588 % | |
69 | Haiti | 64.551 % | |
70 | Venezuela | 64.416 % | |
71 | Panama | 64.085 % | |
72 | Colombia | 63.887 % | |
73 | Cyprus | 63.823 % | |
74 | Uruguay | 63.817 % | |
75 | Sweden | 63.702 % | |
76 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.537 % | |
77 | Sierra Leone | 63.452 % | |
78 | Kyrgyzstan | 63.364 % | |
79 | United States Virgin Islands | 63.349 % | |
80 | Israel | 62.772 % | |
81 | Nicaragua | 62.607 % | |
82 | Portugal | 62.178 % | |
83 | Russia | 62.025 % | |
84 | United Kingdom | 61.942 % | |
85 | Guatemala | 61.794 % | |
86 | Azerbaijan | 61.787 % | |
87 | Costa Rica | 61.428 % | |
88 | El Salvador | 61.389 % | |
89 | Belarus | 61.363 % | |
90 | South Korea | 61.317 % | |
91 | Philippines | 61.259 % | |
92 | Belize | 61.216 % | |
93 | Guinea | 61.131 % | |
94 | Finland | 61.122 % | |
95 | Rwanda | 61.12 % | |
96 | Argentina | 61.114 % | |
97 | Laos | 61.07 % | |
98 | Mexico | 60.921 % | |
99 | Botswana | 60.853 % | |
100 | Armenia | 60.727 % | |
101 | Malaysia | 60.685 % | |
102 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.565 % | |
103 | Estonia | 60.514 % | |
104 | Japan | 60.395 % | |
105 | Latvia | 60.199 % | |
106 | Slovenia | 59.987 % | |
107 | Austria | 59.423 % | |
108 | Zambia | 59.21 % | |
109 | Mongolia | 59.133 % | |
110 | Germany | 59.065 % | |
111 | Honduras | 58.958 % | |
112 | Fiji | 58.873 % | |
113 | Equatorial Guinea | 58.847 % | |
114 | Republic of Moldova | 58.846 % | |
115 | Czech Republic | 58.774 % | |
116 | Slovakia | 58.722 % | |
117 | Spain | 58.335 % | |
118 | Mauritius | 58.208 % | |
119 | Bangladesh | 58.198 % | |
120 | Togo | 58.19 % | |
121 | Guam | 57.8 % | |
122 | India | 57.418 % | |
123 | Chile | 57.348 % | |
124 | Dominican Republic | 57.21 % | |
125 | Tonga | 57.142 % | |
126 | Oman | 57.124 % | |
127 | Guyana | 56.538 % | |
128 | Cabo Verde | 56.38 % | |
129 | Ukraine | 56.24 % | |
130 | Namibia | 56.122 % | |
131 | French Polynesia | 56.076 % | |
132 | France | 56.064 % | |
133 | South Africa | 55.877 % | |
134 | Lithuania | 55.423 % | |
135 | Samoa | 55.292 % | |
136 | Luxembourg | 55.189 % | |
137 | Uzbekistan | 54.974 % | |
138 | North Macedonia | 54.281 % | |
139 | Albania | 54.275 % | |
140 | Cuba | 54.156 % | |
141 | Poland | 54.009 % | |
142 | Sri Lanka | 53.979 % | |
143 | Belgium | 53.656 % | |
144 | Bulgaria | 53.547 % | |
145 | Serbia | 53.502 % | |
146 | Croatia | 52.87 % | |
147 | Maldives | 52.701 % | |
148 | Hungary | 52.307 % | |
149 | Eswatini | 52.302 % | |
150 | Greece | 52.274 % | |
151 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.427 % | |
152 | Suriname | 51.094 % | |
153 | Romania | 50.707 % | |
154 | Morocco | 50.607 % | |
155 | Pakistan | 50.045 % | |
156 | Malta | 49.592 % | |
157 | Senegal | 49.497 % | |
158 | Turkmenistan | 48.982 % | |
159 | Sudan | 48.81 % | |
160 | Saudi Arabia | 48.649 % | |
161 | Italy | 48.578 % | |
162 | Papua New Guinea | 48.486 % | |
163 | Gabon | 48.383 % | |
164 | Montenegro | 48.196 % | |
165 | Gambia | 48.145 % | |
166 | Egypt | 47.93 % | |
167 | Libya | 47.458 % | |
168 | Tajikistan | 46.649 % | |
169 | Tunisia | 46.634 % | |
170 | Afghanistan | 46.622 % | |
171 | Turkey | 46.23 % | |
172 | Puerto Rico | 46.13 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 44.568 % | |
174 | Iran | 44.434 % | |
175 | Syrian Arab Republic | 44.25 % | |
176 | Lebanon | 43.4 % | |
177 | Algeria | 43.177 % | |
178 | Comoros | 42.298 % | |
179 | Iraq | 41.714 % | |
180 | Nepal | 41.089 % | |
181 | Yemen | 40.894 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 39.918 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.8 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.485 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 33.524 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.018 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Qatar
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Mozambique
- #6
North Korea
- #7
Ethiopia
- #8
Nigeria
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
Cambodia
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Yemen
- #180
Nepal
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Comoros
- #177
Algeria
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2007, the country with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was Tanzania with a remarkable rate of 87.86%, while the global range for this metric spanned from a low of 24.02% to a high of 87.86%. The global average Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 61.15%, providing a benchmark for comparison across the 186 countries with available data.
Economic and Demographic Drivers of High Participation
The countries with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rates, such as Tanzania (87.86%), Madagascar (86.55%), and Qatar (85.33%), exhibit distinct economic and demographic characteristics that contribute to these high figures. In many African nations, such as Tanzania and Madagascar, a large portion of the economy is driven by agriculture, which often employs a significant number of young workers. The necessity for family labor in agricultural settings bolsters youth participation.
In contrast, Qatar represents a different economic model, where significant economic growth and investment in infrastructure projects provide numerous employment opportunities, prompting high participation rates among youth. This is compounded by policies that encourage youth employment as part of national development strategies.
Factors Behind Low Participation Rates
At the other end of the spectrum, countries like Sao Tome and Principe (24.02%), Djibouti (33.52%), and Somalia (34.49%) showcase some of the lowest Youth Labor Force Participation Rates. These low rates can often be attributed to factors such as political instability, limited economic opportunities, and high levels of poverty, which restrict the availability of jobs.
For example, in Somalia, ongoing conflict and a fragile state economy hinder the development of labor markets, resulting in fewer opportunities for young people to engage in employment. Similarly, Djibouti faces challenges related to economic diversification, limiting job prospects for its youth.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
The year-over-year analysis reveals notable changes in Youth Labor Force Participation Rates, with China, Macao SAR experiencing the largest increase of +2.75% (4.2%), followed by Jordan with a rise of +2.10% (5.6%). These increases may be indicative of successful policy interventions aimed at integrating youth into the workforce, such as improved education systems and vocational training programs that enhance employability.
Conversely, Guam saw the most significant decrease, with a drop of -4.90% (-7.8%). This decline could be attributed to economic downturns or shifts in industry demands that disproportionately affect young workers. Similarly, Azerbaijan and Vanuatu also experienced declines, suggesting potential economic challenges or policy gaps in supporting youth employment.
Policy Implications and Future Prospects
The data on Youth Labor Force Participation Rates in 2007 highlights the critical role of economic structure, demographic trends, and policy frameworks in shaping these figures. For countries with high participation rates, sustaining economic growth and creating stable job opportunities remains essential. For those with lower rates, addressing structural barriers and investing in education and training can help improve youth engagement in the labor market.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for policymakers aiming to harness the potential of their young populations. By fostering environments that encourage youth participation, countries can not only boost economic productivity but also ensure a more equitable and inclusive labor market, paving the way for sustainable development.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2007
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2007?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2007, with 87.86%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2007?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2007, with 24.02%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2007?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2007 was 61.15%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2007?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2007 was 61.13%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2007?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2007 were Tanzania (87.86%), Madagascar (86.55%), and Qatar (85.33%).
How many countries are included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2007?
The dataset includes 186 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2007.
Insights by country
South Sudan
In 2007, South Sudan achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 74.106 %, ranking #22 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the region's unique economic dynamics. The high participation rate can be attributed to a young population eager to engage in the workforce, driven by the need for economic development in a nation emerging from conflict.
Armenia
In 2007, Armenia ranked #100 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.727%. This rate is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to countries with higher participation rates. Key drivers of this statistic include Armenia's transition from a post-Soviet economy, which has impacted job availability, and a demographic trend of youth migration in search of better prospects abroad.
Malawi
In 2007, Malawi achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 78.524 %, ranking #14 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include a youthful population and the prevalence of agriculture, which employs a large segment of young workers in rural areas.
Netherlands
In 2007, the Netherlands achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 67.168 %, ranking #51 out of 186 countries. This rate is slightly below the European average, indicating a moderate engagement of youth in the labor market compared to its neighbors. The high participation can be attributed to strong vocational training programs and a robust economy that encourages youth employment through various initiatives and policies.
Russia
In 2007, Russia's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 62.025%, ranking #83 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to more developed economies. Key drivers include the transition from a planned economy to a market-based system, which has created both opportunities and obstacles for young workers, as well as demographic shifts impacting the labor market.
Denmark
In 2007, Denmark's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 65.886 %, ranking #61 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting Denmark's robust labor market and supportive policies for youth employment. Factors contributing to this participation rate include a strong emphasis on education and vocational training, as well as a flexible labor market that encourages young people to enter the workforce.
Nicaragua
Nicaragua's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2007 was 62.607 %, ranking it #81 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many other nations. Contributing factors include Nicaragua's youthful demographic profile and economic conditions that necessitate early workforce entry, particularly in agriculture and informal sectors.
Libya
In 2007, Libya's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 47.458 %, ranking #167 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting significant regional disparities in youth employment opportunities. The high unemployment rate among young people in Libya can be attributed to ongoing political instability and a lack of diversified economic opportunities, which have hindered job creation in the country.
Angola
In 2007, Angola achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 77.254 %, ranking #18 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly higher than the global average, indicating a robust engagement of youth in the labor market. Key drivers include Angola's youthful demographic profile and the country's post-war economic recovery, which has created numerous job opportunities in various sectors.
Fiji
In 2007, Fiji ranked #112 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 58.873 %. This rate is notably lower than many Pacific Island neighbors, reflecting challenges in economic opportunities for youth. Key factors influencing this statistic include Fiji's reliance on tourism and agriculture, which can limit job availability for young people, as well as demographic trends that affect the labor market.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data