Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2015
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Qatar | 87.274 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.042 % | |
3 | Solomon Islands | 84.427 % | |
4 | Tanzania | 83.935 % | |
5 | North Korea | 82.081 % | |
6 | Nigeria | 80.793 % | |
7 | Cambodia | 79.603 % | |
8 | Burundi | 79.489 % | |
9 | Eritrea | 79.205 % | |
10 | Mozambique | 79.053 % | |
11 | Burkina Faso | 78.617 % | |
12 | United Arab Emirates | 77.997 % | |
13 | Ethiopia | 77.984 % | |
14 | Vietnam | 77.43 % | |
15 | Liberia | 76.965 % | |
16 | Iceland | 76.677 % | |
17 | Angola | 76.187 % | |
18 | Peru | 75.903 % | |
19 | Uganda | 75.584 % | |
20 | Kenya | 74.289 % | |
21 | Bahamas | 73.938 % | |
22 | South Sudan | 73.829 % | |
23 | Benin | 73.519 % | |
24 | Central African Republic | 73.421 % | |
25 | Niger | 73.342 % | |
26 | Kuwait | 72.324 % | |
27 | Bahrain | 71.359 % | |
28 | Cameroon | 71.153 % | |
29 | China, Macao SAR | 70.806 % | |
30 | Mali | 70.561 % | |
31 | Kazakhstan | 70.429 % | |
32 | Republic of Moldova | 70.215 % | |
33 | Singapore | 69.53 % | |
34 | Oman | 69.445 % | |
35 | Saint Lucia | 69.31 % | |
36 | China | 69.3 % | |
37 | Thailand | 69.269 % | |
38 | Ghana | 69.253 % | |
39 | New Zealand | 68.399 % | |
40 | Switzerland | 68.217 % | |
41 | Congo | 68.11 % | |
42 | Paraguay | 67.926 % | |
43 | Bolivia | 67.538 % | |
44 | Colombia | 67.019 % | |
45 | Malawi | 66.956 % | |
46 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 66.94 % | |
47 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.906 % | |
48 | Timor-Leste | 66.882 % | |
49 | Indonesia | 66.578 % | |
50 | Norway | 66.562 % | |
51 | Netherlands | 66.465 % | |
52 | Georgia | 66.159 % | |
53 | Zimbabwe | 66.13 % | |
54 | Canada | 65.887 % | |
55 | Haiti | 65.868 % | |
56 | Brunei Darussalam | 65.682 % | |
57 | Ecuador | 65.658 % | |
58 | Panama | 65.651 % | |
59 | Israel | 65.55 % | |
60 | Jamaica | 65.496 % | |
61 | Barbados | 65.432 % | |
62 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 65.29 % | |
63 | Malaysia | 65.185 % | |
64 | Nicaragua | 65.096 % | |
65 | Australia | 65.076 % | |
66 | Uruguay | 64.934 % | |
67 | Myanmar | 64.711 % | |
68 | Brazil | 64.275 % | |
69 | Belarus | 64.269 % | |
70 | Cyprus | 64.16 % | |
71 | Honduras | 64.092 % | |
72 | Sweden | 63.922 % | |
73 | Belize | 63.872 % | |
74 | Azerbaijan | 63.537 % | |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.157 % | |
76 | Bhutan | 63.14 % | |
77 | Trinidad and Tobago | 63.045 % | |
78 | Costa Rica | 62.808 % | |
79 | Lesotho | 62.776 % | |
80 | Russia | 62.704 % | |
81 | New Caledonia | 62.693 % | |
82 | South Korea | 62.58 % | |
83 | Guam | 62.406 % | |
84 | United States | 62.267 % | |
85 | Chile | 62.262 % | |
86 | United Kingdom | 62.25 % | |
87 | Botswana | 62.191 % | |
88 | Dominican Republic | 62.007 % | |
89 | Estonia | 61.817 % | |
90 | Ireland | 61.779 % | |
91 | Venezuela | 61.671 % | |
92 | Chad | 61.561 % | |
93 | Armenia | 61.538 % | |
94 | Denmark | 61.413 % | |
95 | Philippines | 61.405 % | |
96 | Vanuatu | 61.209 % | |
97 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.011 % | |
98 | Rwanda | 60.64 % | |
99 | Namibia | 60.639 % | |
100 | Guatemala | 60.596 % | |
101 | Mexico | 60.552 % | |
102 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.465 % | |
103 | Mauritius | 60.342 % | |
104 | Austria | 60.224 % | |
105 | Germany | 60.22 % | |
106 | Latvia | 60.036 % | |
107 | Laos | 60.016 % | |
108 | Luxembourg | 59.869 % | |
109 | Saudi Arabia | 59.749 % | |
110 | Mongolia | 59.674 % | |
111 | Slovakia | 59.625 % | |
112 | Kyrgyzstan | 59.511 % | |
113 | Japan | 59.499 % | |
114 | Czech Republic | 59.372 % | |
115 | Argentina | 59.232 % | |
116 | Cabo Verde | 59.163 % | |
117 | Lithuania | 59.15 % | |
118 | Finland | 58.763 % | |
119 | Zambia | 58.763 % | |
120 | El Salvador | 58.688 % | |
121 | United States Virgin Islands | 58.651 % | |
122 | Spain | 58.623 % | |
123 | Portugal | 58.555 % | |
124 | Fiji | 58.238 % | |
125 | Togo | 58.138 % | |
126 | Slovenia | 57.591 % | |
127 | Poland | 57.076 % | |
128 | Bangladesh | 56.454 % | |
129 | Ukraine | 56.292 % | |
130 | Uzbekistan | 56.286 % | |
131 | Maldives | 56.214 % | |
132 | Hungary | 56.212 % | |
133 | Sierra Leone | 56.193 % | |
134 | French Polynesia | 55.957 % | |
135 | Guyana | 55.769 % | |
136 | Guinea | 55.671 % | |
137 | Malta | 55.634 % | |
138 | France | 55.621 % | |
139 | Suriname | 55.561 % | |
140 | Cuba | 55.552 % | |
141 | Albania | 55.497 % | |
142 | Tonga | 55.04 % | |
143 | Samoa | 54.71 % | |
144 | South Africa | 54.591 % | |
145 | Bulgaria | 54.209 % | |
146 | North Macedonia | 54.004 % | |
147 | Sri Lanka | 53.669 % | |
148 | Belgium | 53.369 % | |
149 | India | 53.031 % | |
150 | Croatia | 52.587 % | |
151 | Montenegro | 52.374 % | |
152 | Pakistan | 52.026 % | |
153 | Turkey | 51.3 % | |
154 | Eswatini | 51.254 % | |
155 | Romania | 51.24 % | |
156 | Serbia | 51.222 % | |
157 | Greece | 51.201 % | |
158 | Gabon | 50.477 % | |
159 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 49.864 % | |
160 | Papua New Guinea | 49.798 % | |
161 | Libya | 49.401 % | |
162 | Italy | 48.621 % | |
163 | Gambia | 47.835 % | |
164 | Tunisia | 47.495 % | |
165 | Morocco | 47.47 % | |
166 | Afghanistan | 47.165 % | |
167 | Lebanon | 47.053 % | |
168 | Egypt | 46.978 % | |
169 | Comoros | 46.084 % | |
170 | Senegal | 45.486 % | |
171 | Sudan | 44.612 % | |
172 | State of Palestine | 43.967 % | |
173 | Turkmenistan | 43.535 % | |
174 | Iraq | 43.04 % | |
175 | Algeria | 42.459 % | |
176 | Mauritania | 42.077 % | |
177 | Iran | 41.941 % | |
178 | Nepal | 40.224 % | |
179 | Tajikistan | 40.103 % | |
180 | Puerto Rico | 38.021 % | |
181 | Syrian Arab Republic | 37.705 % | |
182 | Jordan | 37.659 % | |
183 | Somalia | 34.157 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 32.581 % | |
185 | Yemen | 32.068 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 23.999 % |
- #1
Qatar
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Solomon Islands
- #4
Tanzania
- #5
North Korea
- #6
Nigeria
- #7
Cambodia
- #8
Burundi
- #9
Eritrea
- #10
Mozambique
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Yemen
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Somalia
- #182
Jordan
- #181
Syrian Arab Republic
- #180
Puerto Rico
- #179
Tajikistan
- #178
Nepal
- #177
Iran
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2015, Qatar led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 87.27%, while the global range spanned from 24.00% to 87.27%. The average youth labor force participation rate across 186 countries was 60.88%, providing a broad view of youth engagement in the labor market worldwide.
Economic and Cultural Influences on Participation
The high youth labor force participation rate in countries like Qatar and Madagascar can be attributed to different economic and cultural factors. In Qatar, the economy's rapid growth and demand for labor, including young workers, drive high participation rates. Conversely, in Madagascar with a rate of 86.04%, economic necessity and lower educational enrollment can lead to increased youth employment. Such patterns highlight the diverse reasons behind youth engagement in the labor market, ranging from economic opportunities to survival needs.
On the other end of the spectrum, countries like Sao Tome and Principe and Yemen, with participation rates of 24.00% and 32.07% respectively, face different challenges. High unemployment, limited economic development, and political instability can discourage youth from entering the labor market or make it difficult for them to find work.
Urbanization and Its Impact
Urbanization significantly impacts youth labor force participation. In countries like Nigeria and Burundi, where participation rates are 80.79% and 79.49% respectively, urban centers often provide more employment opportunities, attracting young populations. This migration to urban areas can boost participation rates as more job opportunities become accessible.
However, in countries with less developed urban infrastructure, such as Nepal (participation rate of 40.22%), the lack of sufficient job creation in urban areas can lead to lower participation rates. This demonstrates how the level of urban development can either facilitate or hinder youth engagement in the labor market.
Policy and Educational Systems
Government policies and educational systems also play a crucial role in shaping youth labor force participation. In North Korea with a rate of 82.08%, state-directed employment programs significantly influence youth employment. Similarly, in Cambodia (rate of 79.60%), vocational training and government initiatives aim to integrate youth into the workforce.
Conversely, in countries like Jordan (rate of 37.66%) and Syria (rate of 37.71%), ongoing conflicts and the focus on formal education can lead to lower participation rates as youth prioritize education or are unable to find work due to instability.
Year-over-Year Changes and Their Implications
Analyzing year-over-year changes, Ecuador experienced the most significant increase in youth labor force participation with a rise of 3.04% (4.9%). This increase can be associated with economic recovery efforts and policies encouraging youth employment. Similarly, Jamaica and the Dominican Republic saw increases of 2.95% (4.7%) and 2.48% (4.2%) respectively, potentially due to improved economic conditions and targeted youth employment programs.
In contrast, Yemen witnessed the largest decrease of -4.90% (-13.3%) amidst ongoing conflict and economic turmoil, severely impacting youth employment opportunities. Other countries like Malawi and Ethiopia also saw declines, reflecting broader economic challenges and their effects on youth labor markets.
Overall, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2015 varied significantly across countries, influenced by economic conditions, urbanization, educational policies, and socio-political factors. Understanding these elements provides a deeper insight into the global landscape of youth employment and the diverse challenges and opportunities young people face in the labor market.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2015
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2015?
Qatar had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2015, with 87.27%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2015?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2015, with 24%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2015?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2015 was 60.88%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2015?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2015 was 61.48%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2015?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2015 were Qatar (87.27%), Madagascar (86.04%), and Solomon Islands (84.43%).
How many countries were included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2015?
The dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 2015 included 186 countries.
Insights by country
India
In 2015, India ranked #149 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 53.031%. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include a rapidly growing population, limited job creation in formal sectors, and a mismatch between education and market needs, which hinder the integration of young individuals into the workforce.
Namibia
In 2015, Namibia's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 60.639%, ranking #99 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting a significant engagement of young people in the labor market. Contributing factors include Namibia's youthful population and government initiatives aimed at enhancing vocational training and employment opportunities for the youth.
North Korea
In 2015, North Korea achieved a remarkable 5th global rank with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 82.081%. This figure is significantly higher than the global average, reflecting a strong emphasis on youth employment in the country. The high participation rate can be attributed to North Korea's centralized economy, which prioritizes state-directed labor and mobilization of its youth for various national projects.
Lebanon
In 2015, Lebanon had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 47.053%, ranking #167 out of 186 countries. This rate is significantly lower than that of neighboring countries, reflecting a broader regional challenge in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include Lebanon's ongoing economic instability and political challenges, which have hindered job creation and limited the prospects for young people entering the workforce.
Bangladesh
In 2015, Bangladesh ranked #128 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 56.454%. This rate is lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to higher-performing countries. Contributing factors include a large population of young people entering the workforce and economic reliance on sectors like agriculture and textiles, which often provide limited opportunities for skilled employment.
Turkey
In 2015, Turkey ranked #153 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 51.3 %. This figure is notably lower than many of its regional peers, reflecting broader economic challenges. Contributing factors include high youth unemployment rates and a mismatch between education and labor market needs, which hinder young people's ability to enter the workforce effectively.
Morocco
In 2015, Morocco had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 47.47 %, ranking #165 out of 186 countries. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors include a high youth population and limited job opportunities in sectors such as agriculture and tourism, which often do not fully engage the younger workforce.
New Caledonia
In 2015, New Caledonia had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.693 %, ranking #81 out of 186 countries. This rate is relatively high compared to many Pacific Island nations, indicating a more engaged youth workforce. Contributing factors include New Caledonia's unique status as a French overseas territory, which influences its labor policies and economic opportunities, particularly in tourism and mining sectors.
Portugal
In 2015, Portugal's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 58.555 %, ranking #123 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the European Union average, reflecting challenges in youth employment across the region. Contributing factors include high youth unemployment rates and economic recovery from the financial crisis, which have limited job opportunities for young people in Portugal.
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2015 was 63.537 %, ranking it #74 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a relatively active youth demographic in the labor market. Key drivers for this participation include Azerbaijan's economic diversification efforts and a growing emphasis on vocational education, which align youth skills with market demands.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data