Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 1994
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Burundi | 87.504 % | |
2 | Tanzania | 86.484 % | |
3 | Madagascar | 86.082 % | |
4 | Mozambique | 84.01 % | |
5 | Nigeria | 83.96 % | |
6 | Qatar | 83.77 % | |
7 | Burkina Faso | 83.329 % | |
8 | Solomon Islands | 82.768 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 82.197 % | |
10 | North Korea | 81.943 % | |
11 | Ethiopia | 81.861 % | |
12 | Malawi | 80.82 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 80.669 % | |
14 | Cambodia | 80.512 % | |
15 | Georgia | 79.948 % | |
16 | Niger | 78.859 % | |
17 | Azerbaijan | 78.573 % | |
18 | Vietnam | 77.525 % | |
19 | Angola | 77.401 % | |
20 | China | 77.267 % | |
21 | Liberia | 77.246 % | |
22 | Vanuatu | 76.87 % | |
23 | United Arab Emirates | 75.811 % | |
24 | Thailand | 74.957 % | |
25 | South Sudan | 74.435 % | |
26 | Bahamas | 73.612 % | |
27 | Uganda | 73.585 % | |
28 | Lesotho | 73.513 % | |
29 | Iceland | 73.177 % | |
30 | Ghana | 72.866 % | |
31 | Kenya | 72.742 % | |
32 | Central African Republic | 72.629 % | |
33 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.124 % | |
34 | Benin | 72.078 % | |
35 | Chad | 71.853 % | |
36 | Kazakhstan | 71.659 % | |
37 | Timor-Leste | 71.359 % | |
38 | Guam | 70.79 % | |
39 | United States Virgin Islands | 70.568 % | |
40 | Mali | 70.413 % | |
41 | Bhutan | 70.279 % | |
42 | Jamaica | 69.816 % | |
43 | Bolivia | 69.8 % | |
44 | Paraguay | 69.617 % | |
45 | Kyrgyzstan | 69.309 % | |
46 | Barbados | 68.736 % | |
47 | Congo | 68.49 % | |
48 | Myanmar | 67.986 % | |
49 | Colombia | 67.743 % | |
50 | Brunei Darussalam | 67.382 % | |
51 | Zimbabwe | 66.854 % | |
52 | Netherlands | 66.821 % | |
53 | Indonesia | 66.798 % | |
54 | Albania | 66.602 % | |
55 | Guatemala | 66.536 % | |
56 | Kuwait | 65.874 % | |
57 | Honduras | 65.825 % | |
58 | Bahrain | 65.71 % | |
59 | United States | 65.475 % | |
60 | Brazil | 65.452 % | |
61 | Haiti | 65.417 % | |
62 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.381 % | |
63 | New Caledonia | 65.137 % | |
64 | Canada | 64.751 % | |
65 | Denmark | 64.506 % | |
66 | Armenia | 64.482 % | |
67 | Sierra Leone | 64.451 % | |
68 | Venezuela | 64.324 % | |
69 | Guinea-Bissau | 64.019 % | |
70 | Switzerland | 64.008 % | |
71 | Lithuania | 63.923 % | |
72 | Guinea | 63.871 % | |
73 | New Zealand | 63.68 % | |
74 | Japan | 63.609 % | |
75 | Ecuador | 63.463 % | |
76 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 63.436 % | |
77 | El Salvador | 63.397 % | |
78 | Saint Lucia | 63.361 % | |
79 | Norway | 63.357 % | |
80 | Rwanda | 63.139 % | |
81 | Australia | 63.077 % | |
82 | Estonia | 63.064 % | |
83 | Singapore | 62.945 % | |
84 | Sweden | 62.704 % | |
85 | Laos | 62.239 % | |
86 | Argentina | 62.009 % | |
87 | Russia | 61.875 % | |
88 | China, Macao SAR | 61.834 % | |
89 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 61.823 % | |
90 | Israel | 61.718 % | |
91 | Czech Republic | 61.677 % | |
92 | Botswana | 61.654 % | |
93 | Philippines | 61.422 % | |
94 | Equatorial Guinea | 61.318 % | |
95 | Ireland | 61.298 % | |
96 | South Korea | 61.13 % | |
97 | United Kingdom | 60.827 % | |
98 | Peru | 60.78 % | |
99 | Latvia | 60.717 % | |
100 | Trinidad and Tobago | 60.698 % | |
101 | Cyprus | 60.68 % | |
102 | Finland | 60.513 % | |
103 | Panama | 60.496 % | |
104 | Tonga | 59.924 % | |
105 | Slovakia | 59.887 % | |
106 | Mauritius | 59.868 % | |
107 | Cabo Verde | 59.842 % | |
108 | Poland | 59.749 % | |
109 | Guyana | 59.663 % | |
110 | Zambia | 59.599 % | |
111 | Fiji | 59.591 % | |
112 | French Polynesia | 59.564 % | |
113 | Republic of Moldova | 59.405 % | |
114 | Belarus | 59.355 % | |
115 | Mexico | 59.325 % | |
116 | Togo | 58.927 % | |
117 | Oman | 58.853 % | |
118 | Mongolia | 58.824 % | |
119 | Austria | 58.694 % | |
120 | Germany | 58.684 % | |
121 | Ukraine | 58.593 % | |
122 | Portugal | 58.506 % | |
123 | Serbia | 58.204 % | |
124 | Uruguay | 58.11 % | |
125 | India | 58.063 % | |
126 | South Africa | 57.936 % | |
127 | Slovenia | 57.902 % | |
128 | Uzbekistan | 57.822 % | |
129 | Nicaragua | 57.779 % | |
130 | Dominican Republic | 57.505 % | |
131 | Malaysia | 57.404 % | |
132 | Bangladesh | 57.375 % | |
133 | Sri Lanka | 57.04 % | |
134 | Costa Rica | 57.02 % | |
135 | Samoa | 56.515 % | |
136 | Belize | 56.07 % | |
137 | Croatia | 55.637 % | |
138 | Chile | 55.206 % | |
139 | Namibia | 55.08 % | |
140 | France | 55.067 % | |
141 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
142 | North Macedonia | 54.847 % | |
143 | Turkey | 54.649 % | |
144 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 54.314 % | |
145 | Eswatini | 54.226 % | |
146 | Turkmenistan | 53.888 % | |
147 | Cuba | 52.39 % | |
148 | Luxembourg | 52.198 % | |
149 | Morocco | 51.258 % | |
150 | Sudan | 51.063 % | |
151 | Hungary | 50.996 % | |
152 | Maldives | 50.952 % | |
153 | Senegal | 50.79 % | |
154 | Romania | 50.645 % | |
155 | Saudi Arabia | 50.56 % | |
156 | Montenegro | 50.546 % | |
157 | Spain | 50.307 % | |
158 | Belgium | 50.229 % | |
159 | Greece | 50.072 % | |
160 | Syrian Arab Republic | 49.996 % | |
161 | Malta | 49.875 % | |
162 | Bulgaria | 49.792 % | |
163 | Pakistan | 49.15 % | |
164 | Tunisia | 49.103 % | |
165 | Egypt | 48.88 % | |
166 | Gabon | 48.464 % | |
167 | Gambia | 48.268 % | |
168 | Suriname | 48.043 % | |
169 | Papua New Guinea | 47.948 % | |
170 | Italy | 47.242 % | |
171 | Afghanistan | 46.95 % | |
172 | Puerto Rico | 46.61 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 46.288 % | |
174 | Algeria | 45.761 % | |
175 | Libya | 45.686 % | |
176 | Iran | 45.226 % | |
177 | Lebanon | 44.341 % | |
178 | Yemen | 44.118 % | |
179 | Iraq | 42.355 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.909 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.533 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 40.308 % | |
183 | Jordan | 39.462 % | |
184 | Djibouti | 34.869 % | |
185 | Somalia | 33.876 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.677 % |
- #1
Burundi
- #2
Tanzania
- #3
Madagascar
- #4
Mozambique
- #5
Nigeria
- #6
Qatar
- #7
Burkina Faso
- #8
Solomon Islands
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
North Korea
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Somalia
- #184
Djibouti
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Yemen
- #177
Lebanon
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 1994, Burundi led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 87.50%, while the global range spanned from 24.68% to 87.50%. The global average for this metric was 61.77%, providing a benchmark for understanding youth engagement in the labor market across different regions.
Economic Structures and Youth Participation
The economic structures of countries play a significant role in determining youth labor force participation. In countries like Burundi and Tanzania, where the participation rates are 87.50% and 86.48% respectively, the economy is heavily reliant on agriculture. This sector often requires substantial labor input, drawing youth into the workforce at a young age. Conversely, countries with lower participation rates, such as Sao Tome and Principe with a rate of 24.68%, often have different economic compositions where agriculture is less dominant, and educational opportunities may keep youth out of the labor market longer.
Geopolitical and Social Influences
Geopolitical factors and social norms also influence youth labor force participation. For instance, in Qatar and Burkina Faso, with participation rates of 83.77% and 83.33% respectively, social structures support early entry into the workforce. In contrast, countries like Jordan and the State of Palestine, with lower rates of 39.46% and 40.31%, may reflect different social expectations and educational systems that prioritize extended schooling over immediate work.
Year-Over-Year Trends and Economic Transitions
The year-over-year trends provide insights into economic transitions and policy impacts. Kyrgyzstan experienced the largest increase in youth labor force participation with a rise of 3.77% (a 5.7% increase), likely reflecting shifts in economic policies post-independence from the Soviet Union. Similarly, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan saw increases of 3.06% and 3.03%, indicating similar transitions. In contrast, Slovakia and Russia experienced decreases of 2.27% and 1.97%, respectively. These declines could be attributed to economic restructuring and increased educational opportunities during the post-Soviet era.
Policy Implications and Future Directions
Understanding the youth labor force participation rate is crucial for policymakers aiming to balance educational opportunities with economic needs. High participation rates in countries like Mozambique (84.01%) and Nigeria (83.96%) highlight the need for policies that integrate education with job training to ensure sustainable economic development. Conversely, countries with lower rates, such as Lebanon (44.34%), may focus on creating job opportunities that attract young people post-education. These insights are vital for designing strategies that support youth in transitioning from education to the workforce effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 1994
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1994?
Burundi had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 1994, with 87.5%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1994?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 1994, with 24.68%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1994?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 1994 was 61.77%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 1994?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 1994 was 61.37%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 1994?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 1994 were Burundi (87.5%), Tanzania (86.48%), and Madagascar (86.08%).
How many countries are included in the dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 1994?
The dataset for youth labor force participation rate in 1994 includes 186 countries.
Insights by country
Cuba
In 1994, Cuba's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 52.39%, ranking #147 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than the global average, reflecting the country's unique economic conditions during the post-Soviet era. Factors such as limited job opportunities and a strong emphasis on education contributed to this participation rate, as many young Cubans pursued higher education rather than entering the labor market directly.
Cyprus
In 1994, Cyprus had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.68 %, ranking #101 out of 186 countries. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating potential challenges in youth employment opportunities compared to more developed nations. The relatively high participation rate can be attributed to Cyprus's robust tourism sector and a growing service economy, which often engage younger workers in seasonal and part-time roles.
Singapore
In 1994, Singapore's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 62.945%, ranking #83 out of 186 countries. This rate was relatively high compared to global averages, reflecting the country's robust economic environment and strong emphasis on education and skills development. Key drivers include Singapore's strategic position as a global trade hub and its policies promoting workforce participation among youth, which are essential for sustaining economic growth in a competitive market.
State of Palestine
In 1994, the State of Palestine had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 40.308 %, ranking #182 out of 186 countries. This figure is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting broader regional challenges. The ongoing political instability and economic constraints have limited job opportunities for youth, contributing to this low participation rate.
Egypt
In 1994, Egypt's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate was 48.88 %, ranking it #165 out of 186 countries. This rate was significantly lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Key drivers of this low participation included a rapidly growing population and limited economic diversification, which hindered job creation for young Egyptians.
Austria
In 1994, Austria had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 58.694%, ranking #119 out of 186 countries. This figure was below the European average, indicating challenges in integrating young people into the workforce during that period. Contributing factors included a strong emphasis on education and apprenticeship programs, which delayed entry into the labor market, as well as economic conditions that limited job availability for youth.
South Africa
In 1994, South Africa ranked #126 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 57.936%. This figure was below the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to more developed nations. The aftermath of apartheid and the transition to democracy significantly impacted economic opportunities for young South Africans, contributing to a labor market struggling to absorb the youth population effectively.
Pakistan
In 1994, Pakistan ranked #163 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 49.15 %. This figure is significantly lower than many neighboring countries, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities in the region. Contributing factors include a high population growth rate and limited industrial development, which hinder job creation for young people entering the labor market.
Belize
In 1994, Belize had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 56.07%, ranking #136 out of 186 countries. This rate was notably lower than the global average, reflecting challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include Belize's small economy, reliance on agriculture and tourism, and limited access to vocational training programs, which hinder youth from entering the workforce effectively.
Trinidad and Tobago
In 1994, Trinidad and Tobago had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 60.698 %, ranking #100 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, indicating challenges in integrating youth into the workforce compared to more developed economies. The country's reliance on the oil and gas sector, combined with limited diversification in job opportunities, contributed to these participation levels, as well as demographic trends that influenced youth employment dynamics.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data