Youth Labor Force Participation Rate 2003
Youth labor force participation measures the percentage of young people actively engaged in the labor market, employed or seeking work.
Interactive Map
Complete Data Rankings
Rank | Actions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tanzania | 87.232 % | |
2 | Madagascar | 86.497 % | |
3 | Mozambique | 86.03 % | |
4 | Solomon Islands | 84.662 % | |
5 | Qatar | 83.217 % | |
6 | Nigeria | 82.671 % | |
7 | North Korea | 82.122 % | |
8 | Ethiopia | 82.067 % | |
9 | Cameroon | 81.819 % | |
10 | Burkina Faso | 81.42 % | |
11 | Malawi | 80.815 % | |
12 | Cambodia | 80.42 % | |
13 | Eritrea | 80.226 % | |
14 | Burundi | 80.201 % | |
15 | Niger | 79.173 % | |
16 | Angola | 77.302 % | |
17 | Iceland | 77.229 % | |
18 | Vanuatu | 77.092 % | |
19 | Liberia | 77.071 % | |
20 | United Arab Emirates | 75.471 % | |
21 | South Sudan | 74.463 % | |
22 | Bahamas | 74.334 % | |
23 | Uganda | 74.163 % | |
24 | Vietnam | 74.096 % | |
25 | China | 73.246 % | |
26 | Thailand | 73.015 % | |
27 | Kenya | 72.873 % | |
28 | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | 72.566 % | |
29 | Central African Republic | 72.563 % | |
30 | Ghana | 72.294 % | |
31 | Benin | 71.764 % | |
32 | Georgia | 71.466 % | |
33 | Peru | 70.999 % | |
34 | Lesotho | 70.836 % | |
35 | Azerbaijan | 70.534 % | |
36 | Mali | 70.223 % | |
37 | Kazakhstan | 70.02 % | |
38 | Timor-Leste | 69.752 % | |
39 | Bolivia | 69.639 % | |
40 | Barbados | 69.534 % | |
41 | Bhutan | 69.522 % | |
42 | Brunei Darussalam | 68.185 % | |
43 | Congo | 68.067 % | |
44 | Switzerland | 67.849 % | |
45 | Guatemala | 67.776 % | |
46 | Netherlands | 67.67 % | |
47 | Chad | 67.642 % | |
48 | Paraguay | 67.598 % | |
49 | Colombia | 67.436 % | |
50 | Norway | 67.388 % | |
51 | Kuwait | 67.133 % | |
52 | Canada | 67.111 % | |
53 | Brazil | 66.898 % | |
54 | Myanmar | 66.781 % | |
55 | Cรดte d'Ivoire | 65.927 % | |
56 | New Zealand | 65.83 % | |
57 | Denmark | 65.768 % | |
58 | Indonesia | 65.671 % | |
59 | Zimbabwe | 65.519 % | |
60 | Kyrgyzstan | 65.504 % | |
61 | Jamaica | 65.4 % | |
62 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 65.372 % | |
63 | Ecuador | 65.335 % | |
64 | United States | 65.22 % | |
65 | New Caledonia | 64.996 % | |
66 | Bahrain | 64.989 % | |
67 | Saint Lucia | 64.743 % | |
68 | Singapore | 64.698 % | |
69 | Sierra Leone | 64.64 % | |
70 | Ireland | 64.31 % | |
71 | Trinidad and Tobago | 64.187 % | |
72 | Panama | 63.798 % | |
73 | Guinea | 63.769 % | |
74 | Australia | 63.715 % | |
75 | Guinea-Bissau | 63.68 % | |
76 | Haiti | 63.408 % | |
77 | Cyprus | 63.074 % | |
78 | Honduras | 62.762 % | |
79 | Sweden | 62.64 % | |
80 | Venezuela | 62.538 % | |
81 | Finland | 62.135 % | |
82 | Guam | 62.051 % | |
83 | Portugal | 61.982 % | |
84 | El Salvador | 61.766 % | |
85 | China, Macao SAR | 61.701 % | |
86 | Laos | 61.528 % | |
87 | United Kingdom | 61.368 % | |
88 | Rwanda | 61.363 % | |
89 | Armenia | 61.23 % | |
90 | Nicaragua | 61.229 % | |
91 | Philippines | 61.143 % | |
92 | South Korea | 61.113 % | |
93 | Argentina | 61.036 % | |
94 | Israel | 60.879 % | |
95 | Japan | 60.766 % | |
96 | China, Hong Kong SAR | 60.749 % | |
97 | Mauritius | 60.519 % | |
98 | Belarus | 60.377 % | |
99 | Slovakia | 60.304 % | |
100 | Belize | 60.262 % | |
101 | Costa Rica | 60.04 % | |
102 | Equatorial Guinea | 60.032 % | |
103 | Russia | 59.982 % | |
104 | Malaysia | 59.979 % | |
105 | Lithuania | 59.974 % | |
106 | United States Virgin Islands | 59.752 % | |
107 | India | 59.606 % | |
108 | Mongolia | 59.521 % | |
109 | Czech Republic | 59.498 % | |
110 | Zambia | 59.391 % | |
111 | Botswana | 59.195 % | |
112 | Uruguay | 59.113 % | |
113 | Mexico | 58.815 % | |
114 | Estonia | 58.75 % | |
115 | Austria | 58.728 % | |
116 | Albania | 58.557 % | |
117 | Fiji | 58.357 % | |
118 | Togo | 58.342 % | |
119 | Bangladesh | 58.187 % | |
120 | Tonga | 58.025 % | |
121 | Germany | 57.846 % | |
122 | French Polynesia | 57.512 % | |
123 | Cabo Verde | 57.454 % | |
124 | Republic of Moldova | 57.248 % | |
125 | Latvia | 56.897 % | |
126 | Slovenia | 56.712 % | |
127 | Dominican Republic | 56.633 % | |
128 | Ukraine | 56.51 % | |
129 | South Africa | 56.504 % | |
130 | Guyana | 56.391 % | |
131 | Uzbekistan | 56.135 % | |
132 | Oman | 56.09 % | |
133 | France | 55.989 % | |
134 | Samoa | 55.698 % | |
135 | Chile | 55.031 % | |
136 | Tajikistan | 55.008 % | |
137 | Namibia | 54.986 % | |
138 | Poland | 54.948 % | |
139 | Sri Lanka | 54.889 % | |
140 | Spain | 54.819 % | |
141 | Serbia | 54.518 % | |
142 | Maldives | 53.902 % | |
143 | Cuba | 53.802 % | |
144 | Luxembourg | 53.56 % | |
145 | North Macedonia | 53.483 % | |
146 | Turkmenistan | 53.071 % | |
147 | Eswatini | 52.714 % | |
148 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 52.179 % | |
149 | Hungary | 51.966 % | |
150 | Croatia | 51.775 % | |
151 | Greece | 51.404 % | |
152 | Belgium | 51.255 % | |
153 | Romania | 50.721 % | |
154 | Morocco | 50.673 % | |
155 | Pakistan | 50.59 % | |
156 | Bulgaria | 50.16 % | |
157 | Senegal | 50.119 % | |
158 | Sudan | 49.992 % | |
159 | Malta | 49.753 % | |
160 | Suriname | 48.85 % | |
161 | Montenegro | 48.736 % | |
162 | Papua New Guinea | 48.669 % | |
163 | Italy | 48.624 % | |
164 | Gambia | 48.348 % | |
165 | Turkey | 48.331 % | |
166 | Syrian Arab Republic | 48.09 % | |
167 | Gabon | 48.061 % | |
168 | Saudi Arabia | 47.891 % | |
169 | Tunisia | 46.76 % | |
170 | Puerto Rico | 46.71 % | |
171 | Afghanistan | 46.497 % | |
172 | Libya | 46.445 % | |
173 | Mauritania | 45.386 % | |
174 | Iran | 44.959 % | |
175 | Egypt | 44.129 % | |
176 | Lebanon | 44.117 % | |
177 | Algeria | 43.661 % | |
178 | Yemen | 43.048 % | |
179 | Iraq | 41.932 % | |
180 | Comoros | 41.523 % | |
181 | Nepal | 41.307 % | |
182 | State of Palestine | 38.759 % | |
183 | Jordan | 37.4 % | |
184 | Somalia | 34.176 % | |
185 | Djibouti | 33.753 % | |
186 | Sao Tome and Principe | 24.059 % |
- #1
Tanzania
- #2
Madagascar
- #3
Mozambique
- #4
Solomon Islands
- #5
Qatar
- #6
Nigeria
- #7
North Korea
- #8
Ethiopia
- #9
Cameroon
- #10
Burkina Faso
Analysis: These countries represent the highest values in this dataset, showcasing significant scale and impact on global statistics.
- #186
Sao Tome and Principe
- #185
Djibouti
- #184
Somalia
- #183
Jordan
- #182
State of Palestine
- #181
Nepal
- #180
Comoros
- #179
Iraq
- #178
Yemen
- #177
Algeria
Context: These countries or territories have the lowest values, often due to geographic size, administrative status, or specific characteristics.
Analysis & Context
In 2003, Tanzania led the world with the highest Youth Labor Force Participation Rate at 87.23%, while the global range spanned from a minimum of 24.06% to a maximum of 87.23%. The average Youth Labor Force Participation Rate worldwide was 61.19%, providing a benchmark for understanding how countries compare to the global norm.
Economic Context and Labor Market Dynamics
The variation in Youth Labor Force Participation Rates across countries in 2003 can often be attributed to economic conditions and labor market structures. For instance, countries like Madagascar (86.50%) and Mozambique (86.03%) exhibit high participation rates, reflecting economies where agriculture and informal sectors dominate. In these settings, young individuals often enter the workforce early due to economic necessity and limited access to formal education.
Conversely, countries with lower participation rates such as Sao Tome and Principe (24.06%) and Djibouti (33.75%) may reflect economies with higher unemployment rates or where education policies encourage extended schooling. These factors can delay entry into the labor market, resulting in lower participation rates among youth.
Influence of Socio-Political Factors
Socio-political factors also play a crucial role in shaping Youth Labor Force Participation Rates. For example, in Qatar (83.22%), the high rate can be linked to the country's economic reliance on labor-intensive industries and the influx of young expatriate workers, who are typically more likely to be employed or seeking employment. Meanwhile, the situation in State of Palestine (38.76%) reflects unique socio-political challenges that impact labor market participation, such as restricted movement and economic instability.
Countries like Somalia (34.18%) and Iraq (41.93%) face conflicts or post-conflict recovery situations, which can severely limit job opportunities for youth, thus reducing participation rates. In such contexts, young people often encounter barriers to entering the workforce, including safety concerns and disrupted education systems.
Year-over-Year Trends and Shifts
Analyzing year-over-year changes in Youth Labor Force Participation Rates provides insights into shifting economic and social dynamics. The State of Palestine experienced the largest increase at 7.9%, attributed to efforts to stabilize the economy and enhance employment opportunities. Similarly, Mauritius saw a 3.9% rise, possibly due to policy reforms aimed at boosting youth employment through vocational training and skill development programs.
In contrast, China, Macao SAR recorded the most significant decrease at 3.8%. This decline might be linked to changes in economic policies or shifts towards more service-oriented industries, which typically require higher education levels and result in delayed workforce entry for youth. Other countries like Azerbaijan (-2.7%) and Slovenia (-2.9%) also saw notable decreases, potentially due to similar economic restructuring and increased emphasis on higher education.
Geographic and Demographic Influences
Geographic and demographic factors further elucidate the disparities in Youth Labor Force Participation Rates. In African countries like Ethiopia (82.07%) and Cameroon (81.82%), large rural populations and agrarian economies necessitate youth engagement in labor markets at an early age. These countries often lack comprehensive social safety nets, making labor participation essential for family survival.
Conversely, Middle Eastern and North African countries, such as Algeria (43.66%) and Yemen (43.05%), typically have lower participation rates, which may be influenced by cultural norms that prioritize education or limit female workforce participation. These demographic patterns highlight the complex interplay between cultural expectations, economic structures, and labor force dynamics.
Overall, the Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2003 reflects a mosaic of economic, social, and policy-driven factors. Understanding these elements provides a deeper insight into the labor market conditions and challenges faced by young individuals across different regions of the world.
Frequently Asked Questions About Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2003
Which country had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2003?
Tanzania had the highest youth labor force participation rate in 2003, with 87.23%.
Which country had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2003?
Sao Tome and Principe had the lowest youth labor force participation rate in 2003, at 24.06%.
What was the average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2003?
The average youth labor force participation rate across all countries in 2003 was 61.19%.
What was the median youth labor force participation rate in 2003?
The median youth labor force participation rate in 2003 was 60.96%.
Which countries were in the top 3 for youth labor force participation rate in 2003?
The top 3 countries for youth labor force participation rate in 2003 were Tanzania (87.23%), Madagascar (86.5%), and Mozambique (86.03%).
What was the youth labor force participation rate range among countries in 2003?
In 2003, the youth labor force participation rate ranged from 24.06% in Sao Tome and Principe to 87.23% in Tanzania.
Insights by country
Tunisia
Tunisia ranked #169 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 46.76% in 2003. This figure is significantly lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include high levels of youth unemployment and a mismatch between educational outcomes and market needs, which hinder young people's integration into the labor market.
Sudan
In 2003, Sudan had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 49.992%, ranking #158 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably lower than the global average, indicating significant challenges in youth employment opportunities. Contributing factors include ongoing economic instability, conflict, and limited access to education, which hinder young people's ability to enter the labor market effectively.
Lithuania
In 2003, Lithuania had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 59.974 %, ranking #105 out of 186 countries. This rate was below the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment compared to more developed nations. Contributing factors included Lithuania's transitional economy post-independence, which faced high unemployment rates and limited job opportunities for young people, as well as a significant outflow of youth seeking opportunities abroad.
Timor-Leste
In 2003, Timor-Leste achieved a global rank of #38 with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 69.752%. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic profile. The high participation rate can be attributed to the significant number of young people entering the workforce as Timor-Leste continues to rebuild its economy following independence, emphasizing the importance of youth in driving economic development.
Malta
In 2003, Malta ranked #159 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 49.753 %. This figure is notably lower than the global average, indicating challenges in youth employment opportunities within the country. Contributing factors include Malta's small labor market and a focus on higher education, which may delay entry into the workforce for many young individuals.
Tanzania
Tanzania achieved a remarkable rank of #1 in the world for Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2003, with a value of 87.232%. This rate significantly surpasses the global average, reflecting a robust engagement of youth in the labor market compared to many countries. Contributing factors include a youthful population and economic reliance on agriculture, which often requires substantial labor input from younger demographics.
Zambia
Zambia's Youth Labor Force Participation Rate in 2003 was 59.391 %, ranking it #110 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, indicating a significant engagement of youth in the labor market. Contributing factors include Zambia's youthful population and economic reliance on agriculture, which often provides informal employment opportunities for young people.
El Salvador
In 2003, El Salvador had a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 61.766 %, ranking #84 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than many neighboring Central American nations, reflecting a regional trend where youth engagement in the labor market is critical for economic development. Key drivers for this participation include a relatively young population and economic necessity, as many families rely on the income generated by younger workers in a country with limited job opportunities.
Indonesia
In 2003, Indonesia achieved a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 65.671%, ranking #58 out of 186 countries. This rate is notably higher than the global average, reflecting the country's youthful demographic profile. Key drivers include Indonesia's economic structure, which heavily relies on agriculture and informal sectors, providing ample opportunities for young workers, and a cultural emphasis on early employment to support family income.
Finland
In 2003, Finland ranked #81 globally with a Youth Labor Force Participation Rate of 62.135%. This rate was notably lower than the top-ranked country, which typically sees rates above 80%. Finland's youth participation is influenced by its strong education system, which encourages further study over immediate employment, as well as a robust welfare system that supports young people during their transition into the workforce.
Data Source
Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) | Data
The World Bank provides data on terrestrial protected areas as a percentage of total land area for countries worldwide. This dataset offers insights into the extent of land designated for conservation purposes, reflecting national commitments to biodiversity and environmental protection.
Visit Data SourceHistorical Data by Year
Explore Youth Labor Force Participation Rate data across different years. Compare trends and see how statistics have changed over time.
More Economy Facts
Agriculture Value Added as a Share of GDP by Country
Explore the agriculture value added as a share of GDP by country, measuring the economic impact of farming sectors. This statistic highlights the importance of agriculture in national economies and informs investment decisions.
View dataBrowse All Economy
Explore more facts and statistics in this category
All Categories
Discover more categories with comprehensive global data